chore: regenerate umbrella crate, fix feature propagation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -29,8 +29,9 @@
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! #### The first scenario
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The `pezpallet-derivatives` can be helpful when another pezpallet, which hosts the derivative assets,
|
||||
//! doesn't provide a good enough way to create new assets in the context of them being derivatives.
|
||||
//! The `pezpallet-derivatives` can be helpful when another pezpallet, which hosts the derivative
|
||||
//! assets, doesn't provide a good enough way to create new assets in the context of them being
|
||||
//! derivatives.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! For instance, the asset hosting pezpallet might have an asset class (NFT collection or fungible
|
||||
//! currency) creation extrinsic, but among its parameters, there could be things like some admin
|
||||
@@ -90,9 +91,9 @@
|
||||
//! because `pezpallet-nfts` requires `CollectionId` to be incrementable.
|
||||
//! * It is desired to have a continuous ID space for all objects, both derivative and local.
|
||||
//! For instance, one might want to reuse the existing pezpallet combinations (like `pezpallet-nfts`
|
||||
//! instance + `pezpallet-nfts-fractionalization` instance) without adding new pezpallet instances between
|
||||
//! the one hosting NFTs and many special logic pallets. In this case, the original ID type would be
|
||||
//! `(AssetId, AssetInstance)`, and the derivative ID type can be anything.
|
||||
//! instance + `pezpallet-nfts-fractionalization` instance) without adding new pezpallet instances
|
||||
//! between the one hosting NFTs and many special logic pallets. In this case, the original ID type
|
||||
//! would be `(AssetId, AssetInstance)`, and the derivative ID type can be anything.
|
||||
|
||||
#![recursion_limit = "256"]
|
||||
// Ensure we're `no_std` when compiling for Wasm.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user