Files

T

History

pezkuwichain 267fcec12d fix: quick-checks CI failures - taplo format, zepter, umbrella

1. TOML format (taplo): 123 files reformatted using correct config
   - Command: taplo format --config .config/taplo.toml

2. Zepter feature propagation fix:
   - pezframe-support: added pezsp-timestamp/try-runtime to try-runtime feature

3. generate-umbrella.py bug fix:
   - Script crashed when Cargo.toml/src didn't exist in umbrella dir
   - Added existence checks before deletion

2026-01-26 00:39:59 +03:00

src

fix(ci): resolve all quick-checks failures

2026-01-04 17:22:12 +03:00

Cargo.toml

fix: quick-checks CI failures - taplo format, zepter, umbrella

2026-01-26 00:39:59 +03:00

README.md

fix: resolve all markdownlint errors

2025-12-23 09:37:11 +03:00

README.md

GRANDPA Finality Relay

The finality relay is able to work with different finality engines. In the modern Bizinikiwi world they are GRANDPA and BEEFY. Let's talk about GRANDPA here, because BEEFY relay and bridge BEEFY pezpallet are in development.

In general, the relay works as follows: it connects to the source and target chain. The source chain must have the GRANDPA gadget running (so it can't be a teyrchain). The target chain must have the bridge GRANDPA pezpallet deployed at its runtime. The relay subscribes to the GRANDPA finality notifications at the source chain and when the new justification is received, it is submitted to the pezpallet at the target chain.

Apart from that, the relay is watching for every source header that is missing at target. If it finds the missing mandatory header (header that is changing the current GRANDPA validators set), it submits the justification for this header. The case when the source node can't return the mandatory justification is considered a fatal error, because the pezpallet can't proceed without it.

More: GRANDPA Finality Relay Sequence Diagram.

How to Use the Finality Relay

The most important trait is the FinalitySyncPipeline, which defines the basic primitives of the source chain (like block hash and number) and the type of finality proof (GRANDPA justification or MMR proof). Once that is defined, there are two other traits - SourceClient and TargetClient.

The SourceClient represents the Bizinikiwi node client that connects to the source chain. The client needs to be able to return the best finalized header number, finalized header and its finality proof and the stream of finality proofs.

The TargetClient implementation must be able to craft finality delivery transaction and submit it to the target node. The transaction is then tracked by the relay until it is mined and finalized.

The main entrypoint for the crate is the run function, which takes source and target clients and FinalitySyncParams parameters. The most important parameter is the only_mandatory_headers - it is set to true, the relay will only submit mandatory headers. Since transactions with mandatory headers are fee-free, the cost of running such relay is zero (in terms of fees). If a similar, only_free_headers parameter, is set to true, then free headers (if configured in the runtime) are also relayed.

Finality Relay Metrics

Finality relay provides several metrics. Metrics names depend on names of source and target chains. The list below shows metrics names for pezkuwichain (source chain) to BridgeHubzagros (target chain) finality relay. For other chains, simply change chain names. So the metrics are:

pezkuwichain_to_BridgeHubzagros_Sync_best_source_block_number - returns best finalized source chain (pezkuwichain) block number, known to the relay. If relay is running in on-demand mode, the number may not match (it may be far behind) the actual best finalized number;
pezkuwichain_to_BridgeHubzagros_Sync_best_source_at_target_block_number - returns best finalized source chain (pezkuwichain) block number that is known to the bridge GRANDPA pezpallet at the target chain.
pezkuwichain_to_BridgeHubzagros_Sync_is_source_and_source_at_target_using_different_forks - if this metrics is set to 1, then the best source chain header known to the target chain doesn't match the same-number-header at the source chain. It means that the GRANDPA validators set has crafted the duplicate justification and it has been submitted to the target chain. Normally (if majority of validators are honest and if you're running finality relay without large breaks) this shall not happen and the metric will have 0 value.

If relay operates properly, you should see that the pezkuwichain_to_BridgeHubzagros_Sync_best_source_at_target_block_number tries to reach the pezkuwichain_to_BridgeHubzagros_Sync_best_source_block_number. And the latter one always increases.