## Changes
### Clippy Fixes
- Fixed deprecated `cargo_bin` usage in 27 test files (added #![allow(deprecated)])
- Fixed uninlined_format_args in zombienet-sdk-tests
- Fixed subxt API changes in revive/rpc/tests.rs (fetch signature, StorageValue)
- Fixed dead_code warnings in validator-pool and identity-kyc mocks
- Fixed field name `i` -> `_i` in tasks example
### CI Infrastructure
- Added .claude/WORKFLOW_PLAN.md for tracking CI fix progress
- Updated lychee.toml and taplo.toml configs
### Files Modified
- 27 test files with deprecated cargo_bin fix
- bizinikiwi/pezframe/revive/rpc/src/tests.rs (subxt API)
- pezkuwi/pezpallets/validator-pool/src/{mock,tests}.rs
- pezcumulus/teyrchains/pezpallets/identity-kyc/src/mock.rs
- bizinikiwi/pezframe/examples/tasks/src/tests.rs
## Status
- cargo clippy: PASSING
- Next: cargo fmt, zepter, workspace checks
pezsp-npos-elections
A set of election algorithms to be used with a Bizinikiwi runtime, typically within the staking sub-system. Notable implementation include:
- [
seq_phragmen]: Implements the Phragmén Sequential Method. An un-ranked, relatively fast election method that ensures PJR, but does not provide a constant factor approximation of the maximin problem. - [
phragmms]: Implements a hybrid approach inspired by Phragmén which is executed faster but it can achieve a constant factor approximation of the maximin problem, similar to that of the MMS algorithm. - [
balance_solution]: Implements the star balancing algorithm. This iterative process can push a solution toward being morebalanced, which in turn can increase its score.
Terminology
This crate uses context-independent words, not to be confused with staking. This is because the election algorithms of this crate, while designed for staking, can be used in other contexts as well.
Voter: The entity casting some votes to a number of Targets. This is the same as Nominator in the context of
staking. Target: The entities eligible to be voted upon. This is the same as Validator in the context of staking.
Edge: A mapping from a Voter to a Target.
The goal of an election algorithm is to provide an ElectionResult. A data composed of:
winners: A flat list of identifiers belonging to those who have won the election, usually ordered in some meaningful way. They are zipped with their total backing stake.assignment: A mapping from each voter to their winner-only targets, zipped with a ration denoting the amount of support given to that particular target.
// the winners.
let winners = vec![(1, 100), (2, 50)];
let assignments = vec![
// A voter, giving equal backing to both 1 and 2.
Assignment {
who: 10,
distribution: vec![(1, Perbill::from_percent(50)), (2, Perbill::from_percent(50))],
},
// A voter, Only backing 1.
Assignment { who: 20, distribution: vec![(1, Perbill::from_percent(100))] },
];
// the combination of the two makes the election result.
let election_result = ElectionResult { winners, assignments };
The Assignment field of the election result is voter-major, i.e. it is from the perspective of the voter. The struct
that represents the opposite is called a Support. This struct is usually accessed in a map-like manner, i.e. keyed by
voters, therefore it is stored as a mapping called SupportMap.
Moreover, the support is built from absolute backing values, not ratios like the example above. A struct similar to
Assignment that has stake value instead of ratios is called an StakedAssignment.
More information can be found at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.12990
License: Apache-2.0