abc4c3989b
- Remove nightly-only features from .rustfmt.toml and vendor/ss58-registry/rustfmt.toml - Removed features: imports_granularity, wrap_comments, comment_width, reorder_impl_items, spaces_around_ranges, binop_separator, match_arm_blocks, trailing_semicolon, trailing_comma - Format all 898 affected files with stable rustfmt - Ensures long-term reliability without nightly toolchain dependency
210 lines
6.9 KiB
Rust
210 lines
6.9 KiB
Rust
// Copyright (C) Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
|
|
// This file is part of Pezkuwi.
|
|
|
|
// Pezkuwi is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
|
|
// (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
// Pezkuwi is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
// GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
// along with Pezkuwi. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
|
|
|
use std::{collections::HashMap, time::Instant};
|
|
|
|
use gum::CandidateHash;
|
|
use pezkuwi_node_network_protocol::{
|
|
request_response::{incoming::OutgoingResponseSender, v1::DisputeRequest},
|
|
PeerId,
|
|
};
|
|
use pezkuwi_pez_node_primitives::SignedDisputeStatement;
|
|
use pezkuwi_primitives::{CandidateReceiptV2 as CandidateReceipt, ValidatorIndex};
|
|
|
|
use crate::receiver::{BATCH_COLLECTING_INTERVAL, MIN_KEEP_BATCH_ALIVE_VOTES};
|
|
|
|
use super::MAX_BATCH_LIFETIME;
|
|
|
|
/// A batch of votes to be imported into the `dispute-coordinator`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Vote imports are way more efficient when performed in batches, hence we batch together incoming
|
|
/// votes until the rate of incoming votes falls below a threshold, then we import into the dispute
|
|
/// coordinator.
|
|
///
|
|
/// A `Batch` keeps track of the votes to be imported and the current incoming rate, on rate update
|
|
/// it will "flush" in case the incoming rate dropped too low, preparing the import.
|
|
pub struct Batch {
|
|
/// The actual candidate this batch is concerned with.
|
|
candidate_receipt: CandidateReceipt,
|
|
|
|
/// Cache of `CandidateHash` (candidate_receipt.hash()).
|
|
candidate_hash: CandidateHash,
|
|
|
|
/// All valid votes received in this batch so far.
|
|
///
|
|
/// We differentiate between valid and invalid votes, so we can detect (and drop) duplicates,
|
|
/// while still allowing validators to equivocate.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Detecting and rejecting duplicates is crucial in order to effectively enforce
|
|
/// `MIN_KEEP_BATCH_ALIVE_VOTES` per `BATCH_COLLECTING_INTERVAL`. If we would count duplicates
|
|
/// here, the mechanism would be broken.
|
|
valid_votes: HashMap<ValidatorIndex, SignedDisputeStatement>,
|
|
|
|
/// All invalid votes received in this batch so far.
|
|
invalid_votes: HashMap<ValidatorIndex, SignedDisputeStatement>,
|
|
|
|
/// How many votes have been batched since the last tick/creation.
|
|
votes_batched_since_last_tick: u32,
|
|
|
|
/// Expiry time for the batch.
|
|
///
|
|
/// By this time the latest this batch will get flushed.
|
|
best_before: Instant,
|
|
|
|
/// Requesters waiting for a response.
|
|
requesters: Vec<(PeerId, OutgoingResponseSender<DisputeRequest>)>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Result of checking a batch every `BATCH_COLLECTING_INTERVAL`.
|
|
pub(super) enum TickResult {
|
|
/// Batch is still alive, please call `tick` again at the given `Instant`.
|
|
Alive(Batch, Instant),
|
|
/// Batch is done, ready for import!
|
|
Done(PreparedImport),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Ready for import.
|
|
pub struct PreparedImport {
|
|
pub candidate_receipt: CandidateReceipt,
|
|
pub statements: Vec<(SignedDisputeStatement, ValidatorIndex)>,
|
|
/// Information about original requesters.
|
|
pub requesters: Vec<(PeerId, OutgoingResponseSender<DisputeRequest>)>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl From<Batch> for PreparedImport {
|
|
fn from(batch: Batch) -> Self {
|
|
let Batch {
|
|
candidate_receipt,
|
|
valid_votes,
|
|
invalid_votes,
|
|
requesters: pending_responses,
|
|
..
|
|
} = batch;
|
|
|
|
let statements = valid_votes
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.chain(invalid_votes.into_iter())
|
|
.map(|(index, statement)| (statement, index))
|
|
.collect();
|
|
|
|
Self { candidate_receipt, statements, requesters: pending_responses }
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl Batch {
|
|
/// Create a new empty batch based on the given `CandidateReceipt`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// To create a `Batch` use Batches::find_batch`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Arguments:
|
|
///
|
|
/// * `candidate_receipt` - The candidate this batch is meant to track votes for.
|
|
/// * `now` - current time stamp for calculating the first tick.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Returns: A batch and the first `Instant` you are supposed to call `tick`.
|
|
pub(super) fn new(candidate_receipt: CandidateReceipt, now: Instant) -> (Self, Instant) {
|
|
let s = Self {
|
|
candidate_hash: candidate_receipt.hash(),
|
|
candidate_receipt,
|
|
valid_votes: HashMap::new(),
|
|
invalid_votes: HashMap::new(),
|
|
votes_batched_since_last_tick: 0,
|
|
best_before: Instant::now() + MAX_BATCH_LIFETIME,
|
|
requesters: Vec::new(),
|
|
};
|
|
let next_tick = s.calculate_next_tick(now);
|
|
(s, next_tick)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Receipt of the candidate this batch is batching votes for.
|
|
pub fn candidate_receipt(&self) -> &CandidateReceipt {
|
|
&self.candidate_receipt
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Add votes from a validator into the batch.
|
|
///
|
|
/// The statements are supposed to be the valid and invalid statements received in a
|
|
/// `DisputeRequest`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// The given `pending_response` is the corresponding response sender for responding to `peer`.
|
|
/// If at least one of the votes is new as far as this batch is concerned we record the
|
|
/// pending_response, for later use. In case both votes are known already, we return the
|
|
/// response sender as an `Err` value.
|
|
pub fn add_votes(
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
valid_vote: (SignedDisputeStatement, ValidatorIndex),
|
|
invalid_vote: (SignedDisputeStatement, ValidatorIndex),
|
|
peer: PeerId,
|
|
pending_response: OutgoingResponseSender<DisputeRequest>,
|
|
) -> Result<(), OutgoingResponseSender<DisputeRequest>> {
|
|
debug_assert!(valid_vote.0.candidate_hash() == invalid_vote.0.candidate_hash());
|
|
debug_assert!(valid_vote.0.candidate_hash() == &self.candidate_hash);
|
|
|
|
let mut duplicate = true;
|
|
|
|
if self.valid_votes.insert(valid_vote.1, valid_vote.0).is_none() {
|
|
self.votes_batched_since_last_tick += 1;
|
|
duplicate = false;
|
|
}
|
|
if self.invalid_votes.insert(invalid_vote.1, invalid_vote.0).is_none() {
|
|
self.votes_batched_since_last_tick += 1;
|
|
duplicate = false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if duplicate {
|
|
Err(pending_response)
|
|
} else {
|
|
self.requesters.push((peer, pending_response));
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Check batch for liveness.
|
|
///
|
|
/// This function is supposed to be called at instants given at construction and as returned as
|
|
/// part of `TickResult`.
|
|
pub(super) fn tick(mut self, now: Instant) -> TickResult {
|
|
if self.votes_batched_since_last_tick >= MIN_KEEP_BATCH_ALIVE_VOTES
|
|
&& now < self.best_before
|
|
{
|
|
// Still good:
|
|
let next_tick = self.calculate_next_tick(now);
|
|
// Reset counter:
|
|
self.votes_batched_since_last_tick = 0;
|
|
TickResult::Alive(self, next_tick)
|
|
} else {
|
|
TickResult::Done(PreparedImport::from(self))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Calculate when the next tick should happen.
|
|
///
|
|
/// This will usually return `now + BATCH_COLLECTING_INTERVAL`, except if the lifetime of this
|
|
/// batch would exceed `MAX_BATCH_LIFETIME`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// # Arguments
|
|
///
|
|
/// * `now` - The current time.
|
|
fn calculate_next_tick(&self, now: Instant) -> Instant {
|
|
let next_tick = now + BATCH_COLLECTING_INTERVAL;
|
|
if next_tick < self.best_before {
|
|
next_tick
|
|
} else {
|
|
self.best_before
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|