Fix spelling mistakes across the whole repository (#3808)

**Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.

**This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
repository.**

Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:

- `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`

- `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`

- `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
tracing`

Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
commits for easier reviewing:

- `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'children'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'until'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'indices'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'committed'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'topology'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'response'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'network'`

Let me know if this structure is adequate.

**Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`,
`Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it
as it is.

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to
message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left
it as it is.~~

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the
more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the
correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~

**Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs
`judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc.
are both present in different places, but I suppose that's
understandable given the number of contributors.

~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it
triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it
is.~~

bridges/modules/grandpa/README.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ It is used by the parachains light client (bridge parachains pallet) and by mess
 ## A Brief Introduction into GRANDPA Finality
 
 You can find detailed information on GRANDPA, by exploring its [repository](https://github.com/paritytech/finality-grandpa).
-Here is the minimal reqiuired GRANDPA information to understand how pallet works.
+Here is the minimal required GRANDPA information to understand how pallet works.
 
 Any Substrate chain may use different block authorship algorithms (like BABE or Aura) to determine block producers and
 generate blocks. This has nothing common with finality, though - the task of block authorship is to coordinate

bridges/modules/grandpa/src/call_ext.rs

@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ pub(crate) fn submit_finality_proof_info_from_args<T: Config<I>, I: 'static>(
 	// as an extra weight.
 	let votes_ancestries_len = justification.votes_ancestries.len().saturated_into();
 	let extra_weight =
-		if votes_ancestries_len > T::BridgedChain::REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATON_ANCESTRY {
+		if votes_ancestries_len > T::BridgedChain::REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY {
 			T::WeightInfo::submit_finality_proof(precommits_len, votes_ancestries_len)
 		} else {
 			Weight::zero()
@@ -396,11 +396,11 @@ mod tests {
 		let finality_target = test_header(1);
 		let mut justification_params = JustificationGeneratorParams {
 			header: finality_target.clone(),
-			ancestors: TestBridgedChain::REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATON_ANCESTRY,
+			ancestors: TestBridgedChain::REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY,
 			..Default::default()
 		};
 
-		// when there are `REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATON_ANCESTRY` headers => no refund
+		// when there are `REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY` headers => no refund
 		let justification = make_justification_for_header(justification_params.clone());
 		let call = RuntimeCall::Grandpa(crate::Call::submit_finality_proof_ex {
 			finality_target: Box::new(finality_target.clone()),
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ mod tests {
 		});
 		assert_eq!(call.submit_finality_proof_info().unwrap().extra_weight, Weight::zero());
 
-		// when there are `REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATON_ANCESTRY + 1` headers => full refund
+		// when there are `REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY + 1` headers => full refund
 		justification_params.ancestors += 1;
 		let justification = make_justification_for_header(justification_params);
 		let call_weight = <TestRuntime as Config>::WeightInfo::submit_finality_proof(

bridges/modules/grandpa/src/lib.rs

@@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ mod tests {
 	}
 
 	#[test]
-	fn succesfully_imports_header_with_valid_finality() {
+	fn successfully_imports_header_with_valid_finality() {
 		run_test(|| {
 			initialize_substrate_bridge();
 
@@ -1192,7 +1192,7 @@ mod tests {
 			header.digest = change_log(0);
 			let justification = make_justification_for_header(JustificationGeneratorParams {
 				header: header.clone(),
-				ancestors: TestBridgedChain::REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATON_ANCESTRY + 1,
+				ancestors: TestBridgedChain::REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY + 1,
 				..Default::default()
 			});
 

bridges/modules/grandpa/src/mock.rs

@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ impl Chain for TestBridgedChain {
 impl ChainWithGrandpa for TestBridgedChain {
 	const WITH_CHAIN_GRANDPA_PALLET_NAME: &'static str = "";
 	const MAX_AUTHORITIES_COUNT: u32 = MAX_BRIDGED_AUTHORITIES;
-	const REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATON_ANCESTRY: u32 = 8;
+	const REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY: u32 = 8;
 	const MAX_MANDATORY_HEADER_SIZE: u32 = 256;
 	const AVERAGE_HEADER_SIZE: u32 = 64;
 }

bridges/modules/messages/src/inbound_lane.rs

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ use crate::Config;
 use bp_messages::{
 	target_chain::{DispatchMessage, DispatchMessageData, MessageDispatch},
 	DeliveredMessages, InboundLaneData, LaneId, MessageKey, MessageNonce, OutboundLaneData,
-	ReceivalResult, UnrewardedRelayer,
+	ReceptionResult, UnrewardedRelayer,
 };
 use codec::{Decode, Encode, EncodeLike, MaxEncodedLen};
 use frame_support::traits::Get;
@@ -170,21 +170,21 @@ impl<S: InboundLaneStorage> InboundLane<S> {
 		relayer_at_bridged_chain: &S::Relayer,
 		nonce: MessageNonce,
 		message_data: DispatchMessageData<Dispatch::DispatchPayload>,
-	) -> ReceivalResult<Dispatch::DispatchLevelResult> {
+	) -> ReceptionResult<Dispatch::DispatchLevelResult> {
 		let mut data = self.storage.get_or_init_data();
 		if Some(nonce) != data.last_delivered_nonce().checked_add(1) {
-			return ReceivalResult::InvalidNonce
+			return ReceptionResult::InvalidNonce
 		}
 
 		// if there are more unrewarded relayer entries than we may accept, reject this message
 		if data.relayers.len() as MessageNonce >= self.storage.max_unrewarded_relayer_entries() {
-			return ReceivalResult::TooManyUnrewardedRelayers
+			return ReceptionResult::TooManyUnrewardedRelayers
 		}
 
 		// if there are more unconfirmed messages than we may accept, reject this message
 		let unconfirmed_messages_count = nonce.saturating_sub(data.last_confirmed_nonce);
 		if unconfirmed_messages_count > self.storage.max_unconfirmed_messages() {
-			return ReceivalResult::TooManyUnconfirmedMessages
+			return ReceptionResult::TooManyUnconfirmedMessages
 		}
 
 		// then, dispatch message
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ impl<S: InboundLaneStorage> InboundLane<S> {
 		};
 		self.storage.set_data(data);
 
-		ReceivalResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result)
+		ReceptionResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result)
 	}
 }
 
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ mod tests {
 				nonce,
 				inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 			),
-			ReceivalResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
+			ReceptionResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
 		);
 	}
 
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ mod tests {
 					10,
 					inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 				),
-				ReceivalResult::InvalidNonce
+				ReceptionResult::InvalidNonce
 			);
 			assert_eq!(lane.storage.get_or_init_data().last_delivered_nonce(), 0);
 		});
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ mod tests {
 						current_nonce,
 						inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 					),
-					ReceivalResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
+					ReceptionResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
 				);
 			}
 			// Fails to dispatch new message from different than latest relayer.
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ mod tests {
 					max_nonce + 1,
 					inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 				),
-				ReceivalResult::TooManyUnrewardedRelayers,
+				ReceptionResult::TooManyUnrewardedRelayers,
 			);
 			// Fails to dispatch new messages from latest relayer. Prevents griefing attacks.
 			assert_eq!(
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ mod tests {
 					max_nonce + 1,
 					inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 				),
-				ReceivalResult::TooManyUnrewardedRelayers,
+				ReceptionResult::TooManyUnrewardedRelayers,
 			);
 		});
 	}
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ mod tests {
 						current_nonce,
 						inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 					),
-					ReceivalResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
+					ReceptionResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
 				);
 			}
 			// Fails to dispatch new message from different than latest relayer.
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ mod tests {
 					max_nonce + 1,
 					inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 				),
-				ReceivalResult::TooManyUnconfirmedMessages,
+				ReceptionResult::TooManyUnconfirmedMessages,
 			);
 			// Fails to dispatch new messages from latest relayer.
 			assert_eq!(
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ mod tests {
 					max_nonce + 1,
 					inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 				),
-				ReceivalResult::TooManyUnconfirmedMessages,
+				ReceptionResult::TooManyUnconfirmedMessages,
 			);
 		});
 	}
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ mod tests {
 					1,
 					inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 				),
-				ReceivalResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
+				ReceptionResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
 			);
 			assert_eq!(
 				lane.receive_message::<TestMessageDispatch>(
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ mod tests {
 					2,
 					inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 				),
-				ReceivalResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
+				ReceptionResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
 			);
 			assert_eq!(
 				lane.receive_message::<TestMessageDispatch>(
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ mod tests {
 					3,
 					inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 				),
-				ReceivalResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
+				ReceptionResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
 			);
 			assert_eq!(
 				lane.storage.get_or_init_data().relayers,
@@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ mod tests {
 					1,
 					inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 				),
-				ReceivalResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
+				ReceptionResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(0))
 			);
 			assert_eq!(
 				lane.receive_message::<TestMessageDispatch>(
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ mod tests {
 					1,
 					inbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 				),
-				ReceivalResult::InvalidNonce,
+				ReceptionResult::InvalidNonce,
 			);
 		});
 	}
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ mod tests {
 					1,
 					inbound_message_data(payload)
 				),
-				ReceivalResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(1))
+				ReceptionResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result(1))
 			);
 		});
 	}

bridges/modules/messages/src/lib.rs

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ pub use weights_ext::{
 
 use crate::{
 	inbound_lane::{InboundLane, InboundLaneStorage},
-	outbound_lane::{OutboundLane, OutboundLaneStorage, ReceivalConfirmationError},
+	outbound_lane::{OutboundLane, OutboundLaneStorage, ReceptionConfirmationError},
 };
 
 use bp_messages::{
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ pub const LOG_TARGET: &str = "runtime::bridge-messages";
 #[frame_support::pallet]
 pub mod pallet {
 	use super::*;
-	use bp_messages::{ReceivalResult, ReceivedMessages};
+	use bp_messages::{ReceivedMessages, ReceptionResult};
 	use bp_runtime::RangeInclusiveExt;
 	use frame_support::pallet_prelude::*;
 	use frame_system::pallet_prelude::*;
@@ -376,13 +376,13 @@ pub mod pallet {
 					// delivery transaction cost anyway. And base cost covers everything except
 					// dispatch, so we have a balance here.
 					let unspent_weight = match &receival_result {
-						ReceivalResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result) => {
+						ReceptionResult::Dispatched(dispatch_result) => {
 							valid_messages += 1;
 							dispatch_result.unspent_weight
 						},
-						ReceivalResult::InvalidNonce |
-						ReceivalResult::TooManyUnrewardedRelayers |
-						ReceivalResult::TooManyUnconfirmedMessages => message_dispatch_weight,
+						ReceptionResult::InvalidNonce |
+						ReceptionResult::TooManyUnrewardedRelayers |
+						ReceptionResult::TooManyUnconfirmedMessages => message_dispatch_weight,
 					};
 					lane_messages_received_status.push(message.key.nonce, receival_result);
 
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ pub mod pallet {
 					last_delivered_nonce,
 					&lane_data.relayers,
 				)
-				.map_err(Error::<T, I>::ReceivalConfirmation)?;
+				.map_err(Error::<T, I>::ReceptionConfirmation)?;
 
 			if let Some(confirmed_messages) = confirmed_messages {
 				// emit 'delivered' event
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ pub mod pallet {
 		/// The message someone is trying to work with (i.e. increase fee) is not yet sent.
 		MessageIsNotYetSent,
 		/// Error confirming messages receival.
-		ReceivalConfirmation(ReceivalConfirmationError),
+		ReceptionConfirmation(ReceptionConfirmationError),
 		/// Error generated by the `OwnedBridgeModule` trait.
 		BridgeModule(bp_runtime::OwnedBridgeModuleError),
 	}
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ mod tests {
 			PAYLOAD_REJECTED_BY_TARGET_CHAIN, REGULAR_PAYLOAD, TEST_LANE_ID, TEST_LANE_ID_2,
 			TEST_LANE_ID_3, TEST_RELAYER_A, TEST_RELAYER_B,
 		},
-		outbound_lane::ReceivalConfirmationError,
+		outbound_lane::ReceptionConfirmationError,
 	};
 	use bp_messages::{
 		source_chain::MessagesBridge, BridgeMessagesCall, UnrewardedRelayer,
@@ -950,11 +950,11 @@ mod tests {
 
 		let outbound_lane = outbound_lane::<TestRuntime, ()>(lane_id);
 		let message_nonce = outbound_lane.data().latest_generated_nonce + 1;
-		let prev_enqueud_messages = outbound_lane.data().queued_messages().saturating_len();
+		let prev_enqueued_messages = outbound_lane.data().queued_messages().saturating_len();
 		let valid_message = Pallet::<TestRuntime, ()>::validate_message(lane_id, &REGULAR_PAYLOAD)
 			.expect("validate_message has failed");
 		let artifacts = Pallet::<TestRuntime, ()>::send_message(valid_message);
-		assert_eq!(artifacts.enqueued_messages, prev_enqueud_messages + 1);
+		assert_eq!(artifacts.enqueued_messages, prev_enqueued_messages + 1);
 
 		// check event with assigned nonce
 		assert_eq!(
@@ -1541,7 +1541,7 @@ mod tests {
 	}
 
 	#[test]
-	fn actual_dispatch_weight_does_not_overlow() {
+	fn actual_dispatch_weight_does_not_overflow() {
 		run_test(|| {
 			let message1 = message(1, message_payload(0, u64::MAX / 2));
 			let message2 = message(2, message_payload(0, u64::MAX / 2));
@@ -1775,7 +1775,7 @@ mod tests {
 			//    returns `last_confirmed_nonce`;
 			// 3) it means that we're going to confirm delivery of messages 1..=1;
 			// 4) so the number of declared messages (see `UnrewardedRelayersState`) is `0` and
-			//    numer of actually confirmed messages is `1`.
+			//    number of actually confirmed messages is `1`.
 			assert_noop!(
 				Pallet::<TestRuntime>::receive_messages_delivery_proof(
 					RuntimeOrigin::signed(1),
@@ -1785,8 +1785,8 @@ mod tests {
 					))),
 					UnrewardedRelayersState { last_delivered_nonce: 1, ..Default::default() },
 				),
-				Error::<TestRuntime, ()>::ReceivalConfirmation(
-					ReceivalConfirmationError::TryingToConfirmMoreMessagesThanExpected
+				Error::<TestRuntime, ()>::ReceptionConfirmation(
+					ReceptionConfirmationError::TryingToConfirmMoreMessagesThanExpected
 				),
 			);
 		});

bridges/modules/messages/src/outbound_lane.rs

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ pub type StoredMessagePayload<T, I> = BoundedVec<u8, <T as Config<I>>::MaximalOu
 
 /// Result of messages receival confirmation.
 #[derive(Encode, Decode, RuntimeDebug, PartialEq, Eq, PalletError, TypeInfo)]
-pub enum ReceivalConfirmationError {
+pub enum ReceptionConfirmationError {
 	/// Bridged chain is trying to confirm more messages than we have generated. May be a result
 	/// of invalid bridged chain storage.
 	FailedToConfirmFutureMessages,
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ impl<S: OutboundLaneStorage> OutboundLane<S> {
 		max_allowed_messages: MessageNonce,
 		latest_delivered_nonce: MessageNonce,
 		relayers: &VecDeque<UnrewardedRelayer<RelayerId>>,
-	) -> Result<Option<DeliveredMessages>, ReceivalConfirmationError> {
+	) -> Result<Option<DeliveredMessages>, ReceptionConfirmationError> {
 		let mut data = self.storage.data();
 		let confirmed_messages = DeliveredMessages {
 			begin: data.latest_received_nonce.saturating_add(1),
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ impl<S: OutboundLaneStorage> OutboundLane<S> {
 			return Ok(None)
 		}
 		if confirmed_messages.end > data.latest_generated_nonce {
-			return Err(ReceivalConfirmationError::FailedToConfirmFutureMessages)
+			return Err(ReceptionConfirmationError::FailedToConfirmFutureMessages)
 		}
 		if confirmed_messages.total_messages() > max_allowed_messages {
 			// that the relayer has declared correct number of messages that the proof contains (it
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ impl<S: OutboundLaneStorage> OutboundLane<S> {
 				confirmed_messages.total_messages(),
 				max_allowed_messages,
 			);
-			return Err(ReceivalConfirmationError::TryingToConfirmMoreMessagesThanExpected)
+			return Err(ReceptionConfirmationError::TryingToConfirmMoreMessagesThanExpected)
 		}
 
 		ensure_unrewarded_relayers_are_correct(confirmed_messages.end, relayers)?;
@@ -176,24 +176,24 @@ impl<S: OutboundLaneStorage> OutboundLane<S> {
 fn ensure_unrewarded_relayers_are_correct<RelayerId>(
 	latest_received_nonce: MessageNonce,
 	relayers: &VecDeque<UnrewardedRelayer<RelayerId>>,
-) -> Result<(), ReceivalConfirmationError> {
+) -> Result<(), ReceptionConfirmationError> {
 	let mut expected_entry_begin = relayers.front().map(|entry| entry.messages.begin);
 	for entry in relayers {
 		// unrewarded relayer entry must have at least 1 unconfirmed message
 		// (guaranteed by the `InboundLane::receive_message()`)
 		if entry.messages.end < entry.messages.begin {
-			return Err(ReceivalConfirmationError::EmptyUnrewardedRelayerEntry)
+			return Err(ReceptionConfirmationError::EmptyUnrewardedRelayerEntry)
 		}
 		// every entry must confirm range of messages that follows previous entry range
 		// (guaranteed by the `InboundLane::receive_message()`)
 		if expected_entry_begin != Some(entry.messages.begin) {
-			return Err(ReceivalConfirmationError::NonConsecutiveUnrewardedRelayerEntries)
+			return Err(ReceptionConfirmationError::NonConsecutiveUnrewardedRelayerEntries)
 		}
 		expected_entry_begin = entry.messages.end.checked_add(1);
 		// entry can't confirm messages larger than `inbound_lane_data.latest_received_nonce()`
 		// (guaranteed by the `InboundLane::receive_message()`)
 		if entry.messages.end > latest_received_nonce {
-			return Err(ReceivalConfirmationError::FailedToConfirmFutureMessages)
+			return Err(ReceptionConfirmationError::FailedToConfirmFutureMessages)
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ mod tests {
 	fn assert_3_messages_confirmation_fails(
 		latest_received_nonce: MessageNonce,
 		relayers: &VecDeque<UnrewardedRelayer<TestRelayer>>,
-	) -> Result<Option<DeliveredMessages>, ReceivalConfirmationError> {
+	) -> Result<Option<DeliveredMessages>, ReceptionConfirmationError> {
 		run_test(|| {
 			let mut lane = outbound_lane::<TestRuntime, _>(TEST_LANE_ID);
 			lane.send_message(outbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD));
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ mod tests {
 	fn confirm_delivery_rejects_nonce_larger_than_last_generated() {
 		assert_eq!(
 			assert_3_messages_confirmation_fails(10, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=10),),
-			Err(ReceivalConfirmationError::FailedToConfirmFutureMessages),
+			Err(ReceptionConfirmationError::FailedToConfirmFutureMessages),
 		);
 	}
 
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ mod tests {
 					.chain(unrewarded_relayers(3..=3).into_iter())
 					.collect(),
 			),
-			Err(ReceivalConfirmationError::FailedToConfirmFutureMessages),
+			Err(ReceptionConfirmationError::FailedToConfirmFutureMessages),
 		);
 	}
 
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ mod tests {
 					.chain(unrewarded_relayers(2..=3).into_iter())
 					.collect(),
 			),
-			Err(ReceivalConfirmationError::EmptyUnrewardedRelayerEntry),
+			Err(ReceptionConfirmationError::EmptyUnrewardedRelayerEntry),
 		);
 	}
 
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ mod tests {
 					.chain(unrewarded_relayers(2..=2).into_iter())
 					.collect(),
 			),
-			Err(ReceivalConfirmationError::NonConsecutiveUnrewardedRelayerEntries),
+			Err(ReceptionConfirmationError::NonConsecutiveUnrewardedRelayerEntries),
 		);
 	}
 
@@ -409,11 +409,11 @@ mod tests {
 			lane.send_message(outbound_message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD));
 			assert_eq!(
 				lane.confirm_delivery(0, 3, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=3)),
-				Err(ReceivalConfirmationError::TryingToConfirmMoreMessagesThanExpected),
+				Err(ReceptionConfirmationError::TryingToConfirmMoreMessagesThanExpected),
 			);
 			assert_eq!(
 				lane.confirm_delivery(2, 3, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=3)),
-				Err(ReceivalConfirmationError::TryingToConfirmMoreMessagesThanExpected),
+				Err(ReceptionConfirmationError::TryingToConfirmMoreMessagesThanExpected),
 			);
 			assert_eq!(
 				lane.confirm_delivery(3, 3, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=3)),

bridges/modules/parachains/src/mock.rs

@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ impl Chain for TestBridgedChain {
 impl ChainWithGrandpa for TestBridgedChain {
 	const WITH_CHAIN_GRANDPA_PALLET_NAME: &'static str = "";
 	const MAX_AUTHORITIES_COUNT: u32 = 16;
-	const REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATON_ANCESTRY: u32 = 8;
+	const REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY: u32 = 8;
 	const MAX_MANDATORY_HEADER_SIZE: u32 = 256;
 	const AVERAGE_HEADER_SIZE: u32 = 64;
 }
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ impl Chain for OtherBridgedChain {
 impl ChainWithGrandpa for OtherBridgedChain {
 	const WITH_CHAIN_GRANDPA_PALLET_NAME: &'static str = "";
 	const MAX_AUTHORITIES_COUNT: u32 = 16;
-	const REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATON_ANCESTRY: u32 = 8;
+	const REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY: u32 = 8;
 	const MAX_MANDATORY_HEADER_SIZE: u32 = 256;
 	const AVERAGE_HEADER_SIZE: u32 = 64;
 }

bridges/modules/xcm-bridge-hub-router/src/lib.rs

@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ mod tests {
 		run_test(|| {
 			Bridge::<TestRuntime, ()>::put(uncongested_bridge(FixedU128::from_rational(125, 100)));
 
-			// it shold eventually decreased to one
+			// it should eventually decreased to one
 			while XcmBridgeHubRouter::bridge().delivery_fee_factor > MINIMAL_DELIVERY_FEE_FACTOR {
 				XcmBridgeHubRouter::on_initialize(One::one());
 			}

bridges/modules/xcm-bridge-hub/Cargo.toml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 [package]
 name = "pallet-xcm-bridge-hub"
-description = "Module that adds dynamic bridges/lanes support to XCM infrastucture at the bridge hub."
+description = "Module that adds dynamic bridges/lanes support to XCM infrastructure at the bridge hub."
 version = "0.2.0"
 authors.workspace = true
 edition.workspace = true