pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git synced 2026-06-12 19:21:13 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix spelling mistakes across the whole repository (#3808)

Browse Source 
**Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.

**This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
repository.**

Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:

- `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`

- `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`

- `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
tracing`

Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
commits for easier reviewing:

- `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'children'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'until'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'indices'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'committed'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'topology'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'response'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'network'`

Let me know if this structure is adequate.

**Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`,
`Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it
as it is.

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to
message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left
it as it is.~~

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the
more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the
correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~

**Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs
`judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc.
are both present in different places, but I suppose that's
understandable given the number of contributors.

~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it
triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it
is.~~
This commit is contained in:
Dcompoze
2024-03-26 13:57:57 +00:00
committed by GitHub
parent b839c995c0
commit 002d9260f9
463 changed files with 1119 additions and 1017 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/src/approval_db/v1/tests.rs
+1 -1
View File
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ fn canonicalize_works() {
// -> B1 -> C1 -> D1
// A -> B2 -> C2 -> D2
//
// We'll canonicalize C1. Everytning except D1 should disappear.
// We'll canonicalize C1. Everything except D1 should disappear.
//
// Candidates:
// Cand1 in B2
polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/src/approval_db/v2/migration_helpers.rs
+1 -1
View File
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ pub fn v1_to_latest(db: Arc<dyn Database>, config: Config) -> Result<()> {
block.candidates().iter().enumerate()
{
// Loading the candidate will also perform the conversion to the updated format and
// return that represantation.
// return that representation.
if let Some(candidate_entry) = backend
.load_candidate_entry_v1(&candidate_hash, candidate_index as CandidateIndex)
.map_err(|e| Error::InternalError(e))?
polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/src/approval_db/v2/tests.rs
+1 -1
View File
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ fn canonicalize_works() {
// -> B1 -> C1 -> D1
// A -> B2 -> C2 -> D2
//
// We'll canonicalize C1. Everytning except D1 should disappear.
// We'll canonicalize C1. Everything except D1 should disappear.
//
// Candidates:
// Cand1 in B2
polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/src/approval_db/v3/migration_helpers.rs
+2 -2
View File
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ pub fn v2_to_latest(db: Arc<dyn Database>, config: Config) -> Result<()> {
block.candidates().iter().enumerate()
{
// Loading the candidate will also perform the conversion to the updated format and
// return that represantation.
// return that representation.
if let Some(candidate_entry) = backend
.load_candidate_entry_v2(&candidate_hash, candidate_index as CandidateIndex)
.map_err(|e| Error::InternalError(e))?
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ pub fn v1_to_latest_sanity_check(
for block in all_blocks {
for (_core_index, candidate_hash) in block.candidates() {
// Loading the candidate will also perform the conversion to the updated format and
// return that represantation.
// return that representation.
if let Some(candidate_entry) = backend.load_candidate_entry(&candidate_hash).unwrap() {
candidates.insert(candidate_entry.candidate.hash());
}
polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/src/approval_db/v3/tests.rs
+1 -1
View File
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ fn canonicalize_works() {
// -> B1 -> C1 -> D1
// A -> B2 -> C2 -> D2
//
// We'll canonicalize C1. Everytning except D1 should disappear.
// We'll canonicalize C1. Everything except D1 should disappear.
//
// Candidates:
// Cand1 in B2
polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/src/criteria.rs
+1 -1
View File
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ fn relay_vrf_modulo_cores(
generate_samples(rand_chacha, num_samples as usize, max_cores as usize)
}
/// Generates `num_sumples` randomly from (0..max_cores) range
/// Generates `num_samples` randomly from (0..max_cores) range
///
/// Note! The algorithm can't change because validators on the other
/// side won't be able to check the assignments until they update.
polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/src/import.rs
+1 -1
View File
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ enum ImportedBlockInfoError {
#[error(transparent)]
RuntimeError(RuntimeApiError),
#[error("future cancalled while requesting {0}")]
#[error("future cancelled while requesting {0}")]
FutureCancelled(&'static str, futures::channel::oneshot::Canceled),
#[error(transparent)]
polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/src/lib.rs
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1850,7 +1850,7 @@ async fn get_approval_signatures_for_candidate<Context>(
gum::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?candidate_hash,
"Spawning task for fetching sinatures from approval-distribution"
"Spawning task for fetching signatures from approval-distribution"
);
ctx.spawn("get-approval-signatures", Box::pin(get_approvals))
}
polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/src/tests.rs
+12 -12
View File
@@ -3154,7 +3154,7 @@ where
// starting configuration. The relevant ticks (all scheduled wakeups) are printed after no further
// ticks are scheduled. To create a valid test, a prefix of the relevant ticks should be included
// in the final test configuration, ending at the tick with the desired inputs to
// should_trigger_assignemnt.
// should_trigger_assignment.
async fn step_until_done(clock: &MockClock) {
let mut relevant_ticks = Vec::new();
loop {
@@ -3837,7 +3837,7 @@ fn test_approval_is_sent_on_max_approval_coalesce_count() {
async fn handle_approval_on_max_coalesce_count(
virtual_overseer: &mut VirtualOverseer,
candidate_indicies: Vec<CandidateIndex>,
candidate_indices: Vec<CandidateIndex>,
) {
assert_matches!(
overseer_recv(virtual_overseer).await,
@@ -3845,16 +3845,16 @@ async fn handle_approval_on_max_coalesce_count(
_,
c_indices,
)) => {
assert_eq!(TryInto::<CandidateBitfield>::try_into(candidate_indicies.clone()).unwrap(), c_indices);
assert_eq!(TryInto::<CandidateBitfield>::try_into(candidate_indices.clone()).unwrap(), c_indices);
}
);
for _ in &candidate_indicies {
for _ in &candidate_indices {
recover_available_data(virtual_overseer).await;
fetch_validation_code(virtual_overseer).await;
}
for _ in &candidate_indicies {
for _ in &candidate_indices {
assert_matches!(
overseer_recv(virtual_overseer).await,
AllMessages::CandidateValidation(CandidateValidationMessage::ValidateFromExhaustive{exec_kind, response_sender, ..}) if exec_kind == PvfExecKind::Approval => {
@@ -3885,7 +3885,7 @@ async fn handle_approval_on_max_coalesce_count(
assert_matches!(
overseer_recv(virtual_overseer).await,
AllMessages::ApprovalDistribution(ApprovalDistributionMessage::DistributeApproval(vote)) => {
assert_eq!(TryInto::<CandidateBitfield>::try_into(candidate_indicies).unwrap(), vote.candidate_indices);
assert_eq!(TryInto::<CandidateBitfield>::try_into(candidate_indices).unwrap(), vote.candidate_indices);
}
);
@@ -3895,7 +3895,7 @@ async fn handle_approval_on_max_coalesce_count(
async fn handle_approval_on_max_wait_time(
virtual_overseer: &mut VirtualOverseer,
candidate_indicies: Vec<CandidateIndex>,
candidate_indices: Vec<CandidateIndex>,
clock: Box<MockClock>,
) {
const TICK_NOW_BEGIN: u64 = 1;
@@ -3909,16 +3909,16 @@ async fn handle_approval_on_max_wait_time(
_,
c_indices,
)) => {
assert_eq!(TryInto::<CandidateBitfield>::try_into(candidate_indicies.clone()).unwrap(), c_indices);
assert_eq!(TryInto::<CandidateBitfield>::try_into(candidate_indices.clone()).unwrap(), c_indices);
}
);
for _ in &candidate_indicies {
for _ in &candidate_indices {
recover_available_data(virtual_overseer).await;
fetch_validation_code(virtual_overseer).await;
}
for _ in &candidate_indicies {
for _ in &candidate_indices {
assert_matches!(
overseer_recv(virtual_overseer).await,
AllMessages::CandidateValidation(CandidateValidationMessage::ValidateFromExhaustive{exec_kind, response_sender, ..}) if exec_kind == PvfExecKind::Approval => {
@@ -3978,7 +3978,7 @@ async fn handle_approval_on_max_wait_time(
assert_matches!(
overseer_recv(virtual_overseer).await,
AllMessages::ApprovalDistribution(ApprovalDistributionMessage::DistributeApproval(vote)) => {
assert_eq!(TryInto::<CandidateBitfield>::try_into(candidate_indicies).unwrap(), vote.candidate_indices);
assert_eq!(TryInto::<CandidateBitfield>::try_into(candidate_indices).unwrap(), vote.candidate_indices);
}
);
@@ -4319,7 +4319,7 @@ fn subsystem_relaunches_approval_work_on_restart() {
virtual_overseer
});
// Restart a new approval voting subsystem with the same database and major syncing true untill
// Restart a new approval voting subsystem with the same database and major syncing true until
// the last leaf.
let config = HarnessConfigBuilder::default().backend(store_clone).major_syncing(true).build();
polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/src/time.rs
+2 -2
View File
@@ -126,13 +126,13 @@ impl DelayedApprovalTimer {
/// no additional timer is started.
pub(crate) fn maybe_arm_timer(
&mut self,
wait_untill: Tick,
wait_until: Tick,
clock: &dyn Clock,
block_hash: Hash,
validator_index: ValidatorIndex,
) {
if self.blocks.insert(block_hash) {
let clock_wait = clock.wait(wait_untill);
let clock_wait = clock.wait(wait_until);
self.timers.push(Box::pin(async move {
clock_wait.await;
(block_hash, validator_index)