Contracts: Only exec parsed code in benchmarks (#3915)

[Weights
compare](https://weights.tasty.limo/compare?unit=weight&ignore_errors=true&threshold=10&method=asymptotic&repo=polkadot-sdk&old=master&new=pg%2Fbench_tweaks&path_pattern=substrate%2Fframe%2F**%2Fsrc%2Fweights.rs%2Cpolkadot%2Fruntime%2F*%2Fsrc%2Fweights%2F**%2F*.rs%2Cpolkadot%2Fbridges%2Fmodules%2F*%2Fsrc%2Fweights.rs%2Ccumulus%2F**%2Fweights%2F*.rs%2Ccumulus%2F**%2Fweights%2Fxcm%2F*.rs%2Ccumulus%2F**%2Fsrc%2Fweights.rs)

Note: Raw weights change does not mean much here, as this PR reduce the
scope of what is benchmarked, they are therefore decreased by a good
margin. One should instead print the Schedule using

cargo test --features runtime-benchmarks bench_print_schedule --
--nocapture
or following the instructions from the
[README](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/tree/pg/bench_tweaks/substrate/frame/contracts#schedule)
for looking at the Schedule of a specific runtime

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

prdoc/pr_3915.prdoc

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Schema: Polkadot SDK PRDoc Schema (prdoc) v1.0.0
+# See doc at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/master/prdoc/schema_user.json
+
+title: "[pallet-contracts] Weights update"
+
+doc:
+  - audience: Runtime Dev
+    description: |
+      Update Host functions benchmarks, instead of benchmarking the whole call extrinsic, this PR solely benchmark the execution of the Host function.
+      Previously, some benchmarks would overestimate the weight as both the parsing and execution of the contract were included in the benchmark.
+
+crates:
+- name: pallet-contracts
+  bump: patch