mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-04-26 13:27:57 +00:00
Add documentation around FRAME Offchain workers (#3463)
- deprecation companion: https://github.com/substrate-developer-hub/substrate-docs/pull/2136 - inspired by https://substrate.stackexchange.com/questions/11058/how-can-i-create-ocw-that-wont-activates-every-block-but-will-activates-only-w/11060#11060 --------- Co-authored-by: Sergej Sakac <73715684+Szegoo@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
|
||||
//! # Offchain Workers
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! This reference document explains how offchain workers work in Substrate and FRAME. The main
|
||||
//! focus is upon FRAME's implementation of this functionality. Nonetheless, offchain workers are a
|
||||
//! Substrate-provided feature and can be used with possible alternatives to [`frame`] as well.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Offchain workers are a commonly misunderstood topic, therefore we explain them bottom-up,
|
||||
//! starting at the fundamentals and then describing the developer interface.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## Context
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Recall from [`crate::reference_docs::wasm_meta_protocol`] that the node and the runtime
|
||||
//! communicate with one another via host functions and runtime APIs. Many of these interactions
|
||||
//! contribute to the actual state transition of the blockchain. For example [`sp_api::Core`] is the
|
||||
//! main runtime API that is called to execute new blocks.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Offchain workers are in principle not different in any way: It is a runtime API exposed by the
|
||||
//! wasm blob ([`sp_offchain::OffchainWorkerApi`]), and the node software calls into it when it
|
||||
//! deems fit. But, crucially, this API call is different in that:
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 1. It can have no impact on the state ie. it is _OFF (the) CHAIN_. If any state is altered
|
||||
//! during the execution of this API call, it is discarded.
|
||||
//! 2. It has access to an extended set of host functions that allow the wasm blob to do more. For
|
||||
//! example, call into HTTP requests.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! > The main way through which an offchain worker can interact with the state is by submitting an
|
||||
//! > extrinsic to the chain. This is the ONLY way to alter the state from an offchain worker.
|
||||
//! > [`pallet_example_offchain_worker`] provides an example of this.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Given the "Off Chain" nature of this API, it is important to remember that calling this API is
|
||||
//! entirely optional. Some nodes might call into it, some might not, and it would have no impact on
|
||||
//! the execution of your blockchain because no state is altered no matter the execution of the
|
||||
//! offchain worker API.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Substrate's CLI allows some degree of configuration about this, allowing node operators to
|
||||
//! specify when they want to run the offchain worker API. See
|
||||
//! [`sc_cli::RunCmd::offchain_worker_params`].
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## Nondeterministic Execution
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Needless to say, given the above description, the code in your offchain worker API can be
|
||||
//! nondeterministic, as it is not part of the blockchain's STF, so it can be executed at unknown
|
||||
//! times, by unknown nodes, and has no impact on the state. This is why an HTTP
|
||||
//! ([`sp_runtime::offchain::http`]) API is readily provided to the offchain worker APIs. Because
|
||||
//! there is no need for determinism in this context.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! > A common mistake here is for novice developers to see this HTTP API, and imagine that
|
||||
//! > `polkadot-sdk` somehow magically solved the determinism in blockchains, and now a blockchain
|
||||
//! > can make HTTP calls and it will all work. This is absolutely NOT the case. An HTTP call made
|
||||
//! > by the offchain worker is non-deterministic by design. Blockchains can't and always won't be
|
||||
//! > able to perform non-deterministic operations such as making HTTP calls to a foreign server.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## FRAME's API
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! [`frame`] provides a simple API through which pallets can define offchain worker functions. This
|
||||
//! is part of [`frame::traits::Hooks`], which is implemented as a part of
|
||||
//! [`frame::pallet_macros::hooks`].
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ```
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! #[frame::pallet]
|
||||
//! pub mod pallet {
|
||||
//! use frame::prelude::*;
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! #[pallet::config]
|
||||
//! pub trait Config: frame_system::Config {}
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! #[pallet::pallet]
|
||||
//! pub struct Pallet<T>(_);
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! #[pallet::hooks]
|
||||
//! impl<T: Config> Hooks<BlockNumberFor<T>> for Pallet<T> {
|
||||
//! fn offchain_worker(block_number: BlockNumberFor<T>) {
|
||||
//! // ...
|
||||
//! }
|
||||
//! }
|
||||
//! }
|
||||
//! ```
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Additionally, [`sp_runtime::offchain`] provides a set of utilities that can be used to moderate
|
||||
//! the execution of offchain workers.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## Think Twice: Why Use Substrate's Offchain Workers?
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Consider the fact that in principle, an offchain worker code written using the above API is no
|
||||
//! different than an equivalent written with an _actual offchain interaction library_, such as
|
||||
//! [Polkadot-JS](https://polkadot.js.org/docs/), or any of the other ones listed [here](https://github.com/substrate-developer-hub/awesome-substrate?tab=readme-ov-file#client-libraries).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! They can both read from the state, and have no means of updating the state, other than the route
|
||||
//! of submitting an extrinsic to the chain. Therefore, it is worth thinking twice before embedding
|
||||
//! a logic as a part of Substrate's offchain worker API. Does it have to be there? can it not be a
|
||||
//! simple, actual offchain application that lives outside of the chain's WASM blob?
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Some of the reasons why you might want to do the opposite, and actually embed an offchain worker
|
||||
//! API into the WASM blob are:
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! * Accessing the state is easier within the `offchain_worker` function, as it is already a part
|
||||
//! of the runtime, and [`frame::pallet_macros::storage`] provides all the tools needed to read
|
||||
//! the state. Other client libraries might provide varying degrees of capability here.
|
||||
//! * It will be updated in synchrony with the runtime. A Substrate's offchain application is part
|
||||
//! of the same WASM blob, and is therefore guaranteed to be up to date.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! For example, imagine you have modified a storage item to have a new type. This will possibly
|
||||
//! require a [`crate::reference_docs::frame_runtime_upgrades_and_migrations`], and any offchain
|
||||
//! code, such as a Polkadot-JS application, will have to be updated to reflect this change. Whereas
|
||||
//! the WASM offchain worker code is guaranteed to already be updated, or else the runtime code will
|
||||
//! not even compile.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## Further References
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! - <https://forum.polkadot.network/t/offchain-workers-design-assumptions-vulnerabilities/2548>
|
||||
//! - <https://substrate.stackexchange.com/questions/11058/how-can-i-create-ocw-that-wont-activates-every-block-but-will-activates-only-w/11060#11060>
|
||||
//! - [Offchain worker example](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/tree/master/substrate/frame/examples/offchain-worker)
|
||||
@@ -99,3 +99,7 @@ pub mod frame_runtime_upgrades_and_migrations;
|
||||
/// light-node-first out of the box.
|
||||
// TODO: @jsdw @josepot https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/68
|
||||
pub mod light_nodes;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Learn about the offchain workers, how they function, and how to use them, as provided by the
|
||||
/// [`frame`] APIs.
|
||||
pub mod frame_offchain_workers;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user