Transaction pool: Ensure that we prune transactions properly (#8963)

* Transaction pool: Ensure that we prune transactions properly

There was a bug in the transaction pool that we didn't pruned
transactions properly because we called `prune_known`, instead of `prune`.

This bug was introduced by:
https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/4629

This is required to have stale extrinsics being removed properly, so
that they don't fill up the tx pool.

* Fix compilation

* Fix benches

* ...
This commit is contained in:
Bastian Köcher
2021-06-03 16:04:29 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent f585bf1c1e
commit 258c1a86f6
8 changed files with 170 additions and 68 deletions
@@ -306,31 +306,6 @@ fn should_not_retain_invalid_hashes_from_retracted() {
assert_eq!(pool.status().ready, 0);
}
#[test]
fn should_revalidate_transaction_multiple_times() {
let xt = uxt(Alice, 209);
let (pool, _guard, mut notifier) = maintained_pool();
block_on(pool.submit_one(&BlockId::number(0), SOURCE, xt.clone())).expect("1. Imported");
assert_eq!(pool.status().ready, 1);
let header = pool.api.push_block(1, vec![xt.clone()], true);
block_on(pool.maintain(block_event(header)));
block_on(pool.submit_one(&BlockId::number(0), SOURCE, xt.clone())).expect("1. Imported");
assert_eq!(pool.status().ready, 1);
let header = pool.api.push_block(2, vec![], true);
pool.api.add_invalid(&xt);
block_on(pool.maintain(block_event(header)));
block_on(notifier.next());
assert_eq!(pool.status().ready, 0);
}
#[test]
fn should_revalidate_across_many_blocks() {
let xt1 = uxt(Alice, 209);
@@ -1002,21 +977,13 @@ fn pruning_a_transaction_should_remove_it_from_best_transaction() {
let xt1 = Extrinsic::IncludeData(Vec::new());
block_on(pool.submit_one(&BlockId::number(0), SOURCE, xt1.clone())).expect("1. Imported");
assert_eq!(pool.status().ready, 1);
let header = pool.api.push_block(1, vec![xt1.clone()], true);
// This will prune `xt1`.
block_on(pool.maintain(block_event(header)));
// Submit the tx again.
block_on(pool.submit_one(&BlockId::number(1), SOURCE, xt1.clone())).expect("2. Imported");
let mut iterator = block_on(pool.ready_at(1));
assert_eq!(iterator.next().unwrap().data, xt1.clone());
// If the tx was not removed from the best txs, the tx would be
// returned a second time by the iterator.
assert!(iterator.next().is_none());
assert_eq!(pool.status().ready, 0);
}
#[test]
@@ -1038,3 +1005,79 @@ fn only_revalidate_on_best_block() {
assert_eq!(pool.status().ready, 1);
}
#[test]
fn stale_transactions_are_pruned() {
sp_tracing::try_init_simple();
// Our initial transactions
let xts = vec![
Transfer {
from: Alice.into(),
to: Bob.into(),
nonce: 1,
amount: 1,
},
Transfer {
from: Alice.into(),
to: Bob.into(),
nonce: 2,
amount: 1,
},
Transfer {
from: Alice.into(),
to: Bob.into(),
nonce: 3,
amount: 1,
},
];
let (pool, _guard, _notifier) = maintained_pool();
xts.into_iter().for_each(|xt| {
block_on(
pool.submit_one(&BlockId::number(0), SOURCE, xt.into_signed_tx()),
).expect("1. Imported");
});
assert_eq!(pool.status().ready, 0);
assert_eq!(pool.status().future, 3);
// Almost the same as our initial transactions, but with some different `amount`s to make them
// generate a different hash
let xts = vec![
Transfer {
from: Alice.into(),
to: Bob.into(),
nonce: 1,
amount: 2,
}.into_signed_tx(),
Transfer {
from: Alice.into(),
to: Bob.into(),
nonce: 2,
amount: 2,
}.into_signed_tx(),
Transfer {
from: Alice.into(),
to: Bob.into(),
nonce: 3,
amount: 2,
}.into_signed_tx(),
];
// Import block
let header = pool.api.push_block(1, xts, true);
block_on(pool.maintain(block_event(header)));
// The imported transactions have a different hash and should not evict our initial
// transactions.
assert_eq!(pool.status().future, 3);
// Import enough blocks to make our transactions stale
for n in 1..66 {
let header = pool.api.push_block(n, vec![], true);
block_on(pool.maintain(block_event(header)));
}
assert_eq!(pool.status().future, 0);
assert_eq!(pool.status().ready, 0);
}