Implement validation data refactor (#1585)

* update primitives

* correct parent_head field

* make hrmp field pub

* refactor validation data: runtime

* refactor validation data: messages

* add arguments to full_validation_data runtime API

* port runtime API

* mostly port over candidate validation

* remove some parameters from ValidationParams

* guide: update candidate validation

* update candidate outputs

* update ValidationOutputs in primitives

* port over candidate validation

* add a new test for no-transient behavior

* update util runtime API wrappers

* candidate backing

* fix missing imports

* change some fields of validation data around

* runtime API impl

* update candidate validation

* fix backing tests

* grumbles from review

* fix av-store tests

* fix some more crates

* fix provisioner tests

* fix availability distribution tests

* port collation-generation to new validation data

* fix overseer tests

* Update roadmap/implementers-guide/src/node/utility/candidate-validation.md

Co-authored-by: Peter Goodspeed-Niklaus <coriolinus@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Peter Goodspeed-Niklaus <coriolinus@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Robert Habermeier
2020-08-18 14:41:40 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent 3395044402
commit 262574fc49
36 changed files with 619 additions and 1153 deletions
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Upon receiving a validation request, the first thing the candidate validation su
### Determining Parameters
For a [`CandidateValidationMessage`][CVM]`::ValidateFromExhaustive`, these parameters are exhaustively provided. The [`OmittedValidationData`](../../types/availability.md#omittedvalidationdata) can be deconstructed into the validation data.
For a [`CandidateValidationMessage`][CVM]`::ValidateFromExhaustive`, these parameters are exhaustively provided. The [`TransientValidationData`](../../types/candidate.md#transientvalidationdata) is optional, and is used to perform further checks on the outputs of validation.
For a [`CandidateValidationMessage`][CVM]`::ValidateFromChainState`, some more work needs to be done. Due to the uncertainty of Availability Cores (implemented in the [`Scheduler`](../../runtime/scheduler.md) module of the runtime), a candidate at a particular relay-parent and for a particular para may have two different valid validation-data to be executed under depending on what is assumed to happen if the para is occupying a core at the onset of the new block. This is encoded as an `OccupiedCoreAssumption` in the runtime API.
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Once we have all parameters, we can spin up a background task to perform the val
* The collator signature is valid
* The PoV provided matches the `pov_hash` field of the descriptor
After that, we can invoke the validation function. Lastly, we do some final checks on the output:
After that, we can invoke the validation function. Lastly, if available, we do some final checks on the output using the `TransientValidationData`:
* The produced head-data is no larger than the maximum allowed.
* The produced code upgrade, if any, is no larger than the maximum allowed, and a code upgrade was allowed to be signaled.
* The amount and size of produced upward messages is not too large.