Merge commit '392447f5c8f986ded2559a78457f4cd87942f393' into update-bridges-subtree-r/w

This commit is contained in:
antonio-dropulic
2021-12-01 09:46:14 +01:00
321 changed files with 28385 additions and 10466 deletions
@@ -18,7 +18,8 @@
use bitvec::prelude::*;
use bp_messages::{
DeliveredMessages, DispatchResultsBitVec, LaneId, MessageData, MessageNonce, OutboundLaneData, UnrewardedRelayer,
DeliveredMessages, DispatchResultsBitVec, LaneId, MessageData, MessageNonce, OutboundLaneData,
UnrewardedRelayer,
};
use frame_support::RuntimeDebug;
use sp_std::collections::vec_deque::VecDeque;
@@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ pub enum ReceivalConfirmationResult {
/// New messages have been confirmed by the confirmation transaction.
ConfirmedMessages(DeliveredMessages),
/// Confirmation transaction brings no new confirmation. This may be a result of relayer
/// error or several relayers runnng.
/// error or several relayers running.
NoNewConfirmations,
/// Bridged chain is trying to confirm more messages than we have generated. May be a result
/// of invalid bridged chain storage.
@@ -57,12 +58,14 @@ pub enum ReceivalConfirmationResult {
/// The unrewarded relayers vec contains an empty entry. May be a result of invalid bridged
/// chain storage.
EmptyUnrewardedRelayerEntry,
/// The unrewarded relayers vec contains non-consecutive entries. May be a result of invalid bridged
/// chain storage.
/// The unrewarded relayers vec contains non-consecutive entries. May be a result of invalid
/// bridged chain storage.
NonConsecutiveUnrewardedRelayerEntries,
/// The unrewarded relayers vec contains entry with mismatched number of dispatch results. May be
/// a result of invalid bridged chain storage.
/// The unrewarded relayers vec contains entry with mismatched number of dispatch results. May
/// be a result of invalid bridged chain storage.
InvalidNumberOfDispatchResults,
/// The chain has more messages that need to be confirmed than there is in the proof.
TryingToConfirmMoreMessagesThanExpected(MessageNonce),
}
/// Outbound messages lane.
@@ -98,30 +101,44 @@ impl<S: OutboundLaneStorage> OutboundLane<S> {
/// Confirm messages delivery.
pub fn confirm_delivery<RelayerId>(
&mut self,
latest_received_nonce: MessageNonce,
max_allowed_messages: MessageNonce,
latest_delivered_nonce: MessageNonce,
relayers: &VecDeque<UnrewardedRelayer<RelayerId>>,
) -> ReceivalConfirmationResult {
let mut data = self.storage.data();
if latest_received_nonce <= data.latest_received_nonce {
return ReceivalConfirmationResult::NoNewConfirmations;
if latest_delivered_nonce <= data.latest_received_nonce {
return ReceivalConfirmationResult::NoNewConfirmations
}
if latest_received_nonce > data.latest_generated_nonce {
return ReceivalConfirmationResult::FailedToConfirmFutureMessages;
if latest_delivered_nonce > data.latest_generated_nonce {
return ReceivalConfirmationResult::FailedToConfirmFutureMessages
}
if latest_delivered_nonce - data.latest_received_nonce > max_allowed_messages {
// that the relayer has declared correct number of messages that the proof contains (it
// is checked outside of the function). But it may happen (but only if this/bridged
// chain storage is corrupted, though) that the actual number of confirmed messages if
// larger than declared. This would mean that 'reward loop' will take more time than the
// weight formula accounts, so we can't allow that.
return ReceivalConfirmationResult::TryingToConfirmMoreMessagesThanExpected(
latest_delivered_nonce - data.latest_received_nonce,
)
}
let dispatch_results =
match extract_dispatch_results(data.latest_received_nonce, latest_received_nonce, relayers) {
Ok(dispatch_results) => dispatch_results,
Err(extract_error) => return extract_error,
};
let dispatch_results = match extract_dispatch_results(
data.latest_received_nonce,
latest_delivered_nonce,
relayers,
) {
Ok(dispatch_results) => dispatch_results,
Err(extract_error) => return extract_error,
};
let prev_latest_received_nonce = data.latest_received_nonce;
data.latest_received_nonce = latest_received_nonce;
data.latest_received_nonce = latest_delivered_nonce;
self.storage.set_data(data);
ReceivalConfirmationResult::ConfirmedMessages(DeliveredMessages {
begin: prev_latest_received_nonce + 1,
end: latest_received_nonce,
end: latest_delivered_nonce,
dispatch_results,
})
}
@@ -133,7 +150,9 @@ impl<S: OutboundLaneStorage> OutboundLane<S> {
let mut pruned_messages = 0;
let mut anything_changed = false;
let mut data = self.storage.data();
while pruned_messages < max_messages_to_prune && data.oldest_unpruned_nonce <= data.latest_received_nonce {
while pruned_messages < max_messages_to_prune &&
data.oldest_unpruned_nonce <= data.latest_received_nonce
{
self.storage.remove_message(&data.oldest_unpruned_nonce);
anything_changed = true;
@@ -158,9 +177,10 @@ fn extract_dispatch_results<RelayerId>(
latest_received_nonce: MessageNonce,
relayers: &VecDeque<UnrewardedRelayer<RelayerId>>,
) -> Result<DispatchResultsBitVec, ReceivalConfirmationResult> {
// the only caller of this functions checks that the prev_latest_received_nonce..=latest_received_nonce
// is valid, so we're ready to accept messages in this range
// => with_capacity call must succeed here or we'll be unable to receive confirmations at all
// the only caller of this functions checks that the
// prev_latest_received_nonce..=latest_received_nonce is valid, so we're ready to accept
// messages in this range => with_capacity call must succeed here or we'll be unable to receive
// confirmations at all
let mut received_dispatch_result =
BitVec::with_capacity((latest_received_nonce - prev_latest_received_nonce + 1) as _);
let mut last_entry_end: Option<MessageNonce> = None;
@@ -168,43 +188,48 @@ fn extract_dispatch_results<RelayerId>(
// unrewarded relayer entry must have at least 1 unconfirmed message
// (guaranteed by the `InboundLane::receive_message()`)
if entry.messages.end < entry.messages.begin {
return Err(ReceivalConfirmationResult::EmptyUnrewardedRelayerEntry);
return Err(ReceivalConfirmationResult::EmptyUnrewardedRelayerEntry)
}
// every entry must confirm range of messages that follows previous entry range
// (guaranteed by the `InboundLane::receive_message()`)
if let Some(last_entry_end) = last_entry_end {
let expected_entry_begin = last_entry_end.checked_add(1);
if expected_entry_begin != Some(entry.messages.begin) {
return Err(ReceivalConfirmationResult::NonConsecutiveUnrewardedRelayerEntries);
return Err(ReceivalConfirmationResult::NonConsecutiveUnrewardedRelayerEntries)
}
}
last_entry_end = Some(entry.messages.end);
// entry can't confirm messages larger than `inbound_lane_data.latest_received_nonce()`
// (guaranteed by the `InboundLane::receive_message()`)
if entry.messages.end > latest_received_nonce {
// technically this will be detected in the next loop iteration as `InvalidNumberOfDispatchResults`
// but to guarantee safety of loop operations below this is detected now
return Err(ReceivalConfirmationResult::FailedToConfirmFutureMessages);
// technically this will be detected in the next loop iteration as
// `InvalidNumberOfDispatchResults` but to guarantee safety of loop operations below
// this is detected now
return Err(ReceivalConfirmationResult::FailedToConfirmFutureMessages)
}
// entry must have single dispatch result for every message
// (guaranteed by the `InboundLane::receive_message()`)
if entry.messages.dispatch_results.len() as MessageNonce != entry.messages.end - entry.messages.begin + 1 {
return Err(ReceivalConfirmationResult::InvalidNumberOfDispatchResults);
if entry.messages.dispatch_results.len() as MessageNonce !=
entry.messages.end - entry.messages.begin + 1
{
return Err(ReceivalConfirmationResult::InvalidNumberOfDispatchResults)
}
// now we know that the entry is valid
// => let's check if it brings new confirmations
let new_messages_begin = sp_std::cmp::max(entry.messages.begin, prev_latest_received_nonce + 1);
let new_messages_begin =
sp_std::cmp::max(entry.messages.begin, prev_latest_received_nonce + 1);
let new_messages_end = sp_std::cmp::min(entry.messages.end, latest_received_nonce);
let new_messages_range = new_messages_begin..=new_messages_end;
if new_messages_range.is_empty() {
continue;
continue
}
// now we know that entry brings new confirmations
// => let's extract dispatch results
received_dispatch_result.extend_from_bitslice(
&entry.messages.dispatch_results[(new_messages_begin - entry.messages.begin) as usize..],
&entry.messages.dispatch_results
[(new_messages_begin - entry.messages.begin) as usize..],
);
}
@@ -215,12 +240,17 @@ fn extract_dispatch_results<RelayerId>(
mod tests {
use super::*;
use crate::{
mock::{message_data, run_test, unrewarded_relayer, TestRelayer, TestRuntime, REGULAR_PAYLOAD, TEST_LANE_ID},
mock::{
message_data, run_test, unrewarded_relayer, TestRelayer, TestRuntime, REGULAR_PAYLOAD,
TEST_LANE_ID,
},
outbound_lane,
};
use sp_std::ops::RangeInclusive;
fn unrewarded_relayers(nonces: RangeInclusive<MessageNonce>) -> VecDeque<UnrewardedRelayer<TestRelayer>> {
fn unrewarded_relayers(
nonces: RangeInclusive<MessageNonce>,
) -> VecDeque<UnrewardedRelayer<TestRelayer>> {
vec![unrewarded_relayer(*nonces.start(), *nonces.end(), 0)]
.into_iter()
.collect()
@@ -245,7 +275,7 @@ mod tests {
lane.send_message(message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD));
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().latest_generated_nonce, 3);
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().latest_received_nonce, 0);
let result = lane.confirm_delivery(latest_received_nonce, relayers);
let result = lane.confirm_delivery(3, latest_received_nonce, relayers);
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().latest_generated_nonce, 3);
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().latest_received_nonce, 0);
result
@@ -273,7 +303,7 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().latest_generated_nonce, 3);
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().latest_received_nonce, 0);
assert_eq!(
lane.confirm_delivery(3, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=3)),
lane.confirm_delivery(3, 3, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=3)),
ReceivalConfirmationResult::ConfirmedMessages(delivered_messages(1..=3)),
);
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().latest_generated_nonce, 3);
@@ -291,18 +321,18 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().latest_generated_nonce, 3);
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().latest_received_nonce, 0);
assert_eq!(
lane.confirm_delivery(3, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=3)),
lane.confirm_delivery(3, 3, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=3)),
ReceivalConfirmationResult::ConfirmedMessages(delivered_messages(1..=3)),
);
assert_eq!(
lane.confirm_delivery(3, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=3)),
lane.confirm_delivery(3, 3, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=3)),
ReceivalConfirmationResult::NoNewConfirmations,
);
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().latest_generated_nonce, 3);
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().latest_received_nonce, 3);
assert_eq!(
lane.confirm_delivery(2, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=1)),
lane.confirm_delivery(1, 2, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=1)),
ReceivalConfirmationResult::NoNewConfirmations,
);
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().latest_generated_nonce, 3);
@@ -393,18 +423,40 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().oldest_unpruned_nonce, 1);
// after confirmation, some messages are received
assert_eq!(
lane.confirm_delivery(2, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=2)),
lane.confirm_delivery(2, 2, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=2)),
ReceivalConfirmationResult::ConfirmedMessages(delivered_messages(1..=2)),
);
assert_eq!(lane.prune_messages(100), 2);
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().oldest_unpruned_nonce, 3);
// after last message is confirmed, everything is pruned
assert_eq!(
lane.confirm_delivery(3, &unrewarded_relayers(3..=3)),
lane.confirm_delivery(1, 3, &unrewarded_relayers(3..=3)),
ReceivalConfirmationResult::ConfirmedMessages(delivered_messages(3..=3)),
);
assert_eq!(lane.prune_messages(100), 1);
assert_eq!(lane.storage.data().oldest_unpruned_nonce, 4);
});
}
#[test]
fn confirm_delivery_detects_when_more_than_expected_messages_are_confirmed() {
run_test(|| {
let mut lane = outbound_lane::<TestRuntime, _>(TEST_LANE_ID);
lane.send_message(message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD));
lane.send_message(message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD));
lane.send_message(message_data(REGULAR_PAYLOAD));
assert_eq!(
lane.confirm_delivery(0, 3, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=3)),
ReceivalConfirmationResult::TryingToConfirmMoreMessagesThanExpected(3),
);
assert_eq!(
lane.confirm_delivery(2, 3, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=3)),
ReceivalConfirmationResult::TryingToConfirmMoreMessagesThanExpected(3),
);
assert_eq!(
lane.confirm_delivery(3, 3, &unrewarded_relayers(1..=3)),
ReceivalConfirmationResult::ConfirmedMessages(delivered_messages(1..=3)),
);
});
}
}