diff --git a/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/benchmarking.rs b/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/benchmarking.rs
index d37b9451b7..cc322cbb4d 100644
--- a/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/benchmarking.rs
+++ b/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/benchmarking.rs
@@ -148,7 +148,10 @@ fn solution_with_size<T: Config>(
 	let score = solution.clone().score(stake_of, voter_at, target_at).unwrap();
 	let round = <MultiPhase<T>>::round();
 
-	assert!(score[0] > 0, "score is zero, this probably means that the stakes are not set.");
+	assert!(
+		score.minimal_stake > 0,
+		"score is zero, this probably means that the stakes are not set."
+	);
 	Ok(RawSolution { solution, score, round })
 }
 
@@ -312,7 +315,7 @@ frame_benchmarking::benchmarks! {
 		// the solution will be worse than all of them meaning the score need to be checked against
 		// ~ log2(c)
 		let solution = RawSolution {
-			score: [(10_000_000u128 - 1).into(), 0, 0],
+			score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 10_000_000u128 - 1, ..Default::default() },
 			..Default::default()
 		};
 
@@ -323,7 +326,7 @@ frame_benchmarking::benchmarks! {
 		let mut signed_submissions = SignedSubmissions::<T>::get();
 		for i in 0..c {
 			let raw_solution = RawSolution {
-				score: [(10_000_000 + i).into(), 0, 0],
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 10_000_000u128 + (i as u128), ..Default::default() },
 				..Default::default()
 			};
 			let signed_submission = SignedSubmission {
diff --git a/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/lib.rs b/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/lib.rs
index cad3d12605..58df7d5a9d 100644
--- a/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/lib.rs
+++ b/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/lib.rs
@@ -944,8 +944,11 @@ pub mod pallet {
 			// Note: we don't `rotate_round` at this point; the next call to
 			// `ElectionProvider::elect` will succeed and take care of that.
 
-			let solution =
-				ReadySolution { supports, score: [0, 0, 0], compute: ElectionCompute::Emergency };
+			let solution = ReadySolution {
+				supports,
+				score: Default::default(),
+				compute: ElectionCompute::Emergency,
+			};
 
 			<QueuedSolution<T>>::put(solution);
 			Ok(())
@@ -1059,8 +1062,11 @@ pub mod pallet {
 					},
 				)?;
 
-			let solution =
-				ReadySolution { supports, score: [0, 0, 0], compute: ElectionCompute::Fallback };
+			let solution = ReadySolution {
+				supports,
+				score: Default::default(),
+				compute: ElectionCompute::Fallback,
+			};
 
 			<QueuedSolution<T>>::put(solution);
 			Ok(())
@@ -1138,10 +1144,10 @@ pub mod pallet {
 					.map_err(dispatch_error_to_invalid)?;
 
 				ValidTransaction::with_tag_prefix("OffchainElection")
-					// The higher the score[0], the better a solution is.
+					// The higher the score.minimal_stake, the better a solution is.
 					.priority(
 						T::MinerTxPriority::get()
-							.saturating_add(raw_solution.score[0].saturated_into()),
+							.saturating_add(raw_solution.score.minimal_stake.saturated_into()),
 					)
 					// Used to deduplicate unsigned solutions: each validator should produce one
 					// solution per round at most, and solutions are not propagate.
@@ -1430,7 +1436,7 @@ impl<T: Config> Pallet<T> {
 		let submitted_score = raw_solution.score.clone();
 		ensure!(
 			Self::minimum_untrusted_score().map_or(true, |min_score| {
-				sp_npos_elections::is_score_better(submitted_score, min_score, Perbill::zero())
+				submitted_score.strict_threshold_better(min_score, Perbill::zero())
 			}),
 			FeasibilityError::UntrustedScoreTooLow
 		);
@@ -1750,7 +1756,7 @@ mod feasibility_check {
 			assert_eq!(MultiPhase::snapshot().unwrap().voters.len(), 8);
 
 			// Simply faff with the score.
-			solution.score[0] += 1;
+			solution.score.minimal_stake += 1;
 
 			assert_noop!(
 				MultiPhase::feasibility_check(solution, COMPUTE),
@@ -1960,7 +1966,10 @@ mod tests {
 
 			// fill the queue with signed submissions
 			for s in 0..SignedMaxSubmissions::get() {
-				let solution = RawSolution { score: [(5 + s).into(), 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+				let solution = RawSolution {
+					score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: (5 + s).into(), ..Default::default() },
+					..Default::default()
+				};
 				assert_ok!(MultiPhase::submit(
 					crate::mock::Origin::signed(99),
 					Box::new(solution),
@@ -2087,13 +2096,19 @@ mod tests {
 			crate::mock::Balancing::set(Some((2, 0)));
 
 			let (solution, _) = MultiPhase::mine_solution::<<Runtime as Config>::Solver>().unwrap();
-			// Default solution has a score of [50, 100, 5000].
-			assert_eq!(solution.score, [50, 100, 5000]);
+			// Default solution's score.
+			assert!(matches!(solution.score, ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 50, .. }));
 
-			<MinimumUntrustedScore<Runtime>>::put([49, 0, 0]);
+			<MinimumUntrustedScore<Runtime>>::put(ElectionScore {
+				minimal_stake: 49,
+				..Default::default()
+			});
 			assert_ok!(MultiPhase::feasibility_check(solution.clone(), ElectionCompute::Signed));
 
-			<MinimumUntrustedScore<Runtime>>::put([51, 0, 0]);
+			<MinimumUntrustedScore<Runtime>>::put(ElectionScore {
+				minimal_stake: 51,
+				..Default::default()
+			});
 			assert_noop!(
 				MultiPhase::feasibility_check(solution, ElectionCompute::Signed),
 				FeasibilityError::UntrustedScoreTooLow,
diff --git a/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/signed.rs b/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/signed.rs
index 3b314bce80..4362fb5127 100644
--- a/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/signed.rs
+++ b/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/signed.rs
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ use frame_support::{
 	traits::{defensive_prelude::*, Currency, Get, OnUnbalanced, ReservableCurrency},
 };
 use sp_arithmetic::traits::SaturatedConversion;
-use sp_npos_elections::{is_score_better, ElectionScore, NposSolution};
+use sp_npos_elections::{ElectionScore, NposSolution};
 use sp_runtime::{
 	traits::{Saturating, Zero},
 	RuntimeDebug,
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ impl<T: Config> SignedSubmissions<T> {
 				let threshold = T::SolutionImprovementThreshold::get();
 
 				// if we haven't improved on the weakest score, don't change anything.
-				if !is_score_better(insert_score, weakest_score, threshold) {
+				if !insert_score.strict_threshold_better(weakest_score, threshold) {
 					return InsertResult::NotInserted
 				}
 
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ mod tests {
 			assert_eq!(balances(&99), (100, 0));
 
 			// make the solution invalid.
-			solution.score[0] += 1;
+			solution.score.minimal_stake += 1;
 
 			assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution));
 			assert_eq!(balances(&99), (95, 5));
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ mod tests {
 			assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution.clone()));
 
 			// make the solution invalid and weaker.
-			solution.score[0] -= 1;
+			solution.score.minimal_stake -= 1;
 			assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(999), solution));
 			assert_eq!(balances(&99), (95, 5));
 			assert_eq!(balances(&999), (95, 5));
@@ -641,12 +641,18 @@ mod tests {
 
 			for s in 0..SignedMaxSubmissions::get() {
 				// score is always getting better
-				let solution = RawSolution { score: [(5 + s).into(), 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+				let solution = RawSolution {
+					score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: (5 + s).into(), ..Default::default() },
+					..Default::default()
+				};
 				assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution));
 			}
 
 			// weaker.
-			let solution = RawSolution { score: [4, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+			let solution = RawSolution {
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 4, ..Default::default() },
+				..Default::default()
+			};
 
 			assert_noop!(
 				submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution),
@@ -663,27 +669,33 @@ mod tests {
 
 			for s in 0..SignedMaxSubmissions::get() {
 				// score is always getting better
-				let solution = RawSolution { score: [(5 + s).into(), 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+				let solution = RawSolution {
+					score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: (5 + s).into(), ..Default::default() },
+					..Default::default()
+				};
 				assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution));
 			}
 
 			assert_eq!(
 				MultiPhase::signed_submissions()
 					.iter()
-					.map(|s| s.raw_solution.score[0])
+					.map(|s| s.raw_solution.score.minimal_stake)
 					.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
 				vec![5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
 			);
 
 			// better.
-			let solution = RawSolution { score: [20, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+			let solution = RawSolution {
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 20, ..Default::default() },
+				..Default::default()
+			};
 			assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution));
 
 			// the one with score 5 was rejected, the new one inserted.
 			assert_eq!(
 				MultiPhase::signed_submissions()
 					.iter()
-					.map(|s| s.raw_solution.score[0])
+					.map(|s| s.raw_solution.score.minimal_stake)
 					.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
 				vec![6, 7, 8, 9, 20]
 			);
@@ -698,30 +710,39 @@ mod tests {
 
 			for s in 1..SignedMaxSubmissions::get() {
 				// score is always getting better
-				let solution = RawSolution { score: [(5 + s).into(), 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+				let solution = RawSolution {
+					score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: (5 + s).into(), ..Default::default() },
+					..Default::default()
+				};
 				assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution));
 			}
 
-			let solution = RawSolution { score: [4, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+			let solution = RawSolution {
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 4, ..Default::default() },
+				..Default::default()
+			};
 			assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution));
 
 			assert_eq!(
 				MultiPhase::signed_submissions()
 					.iter()
-					.map(|s| s.raw_solution.score[0])
+					.map(|s| s.raw_solution.score.minimal_stake)
 					.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
 				vec![4, 6, 7, 8, 9],
 			);
 
 			// better.
-			let solution = RawSolution { score: [5, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+			let solution = RawSolution {
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 5, ..Default::default() },
+				..Default::default()
+			};
 			assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution));
 
 			// the one with score 5 was rejected, the new one inserted.
 			assert_eq!(
 				MultiPhase::signed_submissions()
 					.iter()
-					.map(|s| s.raw_solution.score[0])
+					.map(|s| s.raw_solution.score.minimal_stake)
 					.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
 				vec![5, 6, 7, 8, 9],
 			);
@@ -736,7 +757,10 @@ mod tests {
 
 			for s in 0..SignedMaxSubmissions::get() {
 				// score is always getting better
-				let solution = RawSolution { score: [(5 + s).into(), 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+				let solution = RawSolution {
+					score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: (5 + s).into(), ..Default::default() },
+					..Default::default()
+				};
 				assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution));
 			}
 
@@ -744,7 +768,10 @@ mod tests {
 			assert_eq!(balances(&999).1, 0);
 
 			// better.
-			let solution = RawSolution { score: [20, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+			let solution = RawSolution {
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 20, ..Default::default() },
+				..Default::default()
+			};
 			assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(999), solution));
 
 			// got one bond back.
@@ -760,19 +787,25 @@ mod tests {
 			assert!(MultiPhase::current_phase().is_signed());
 
 			for i in 0..SignedMaxSubmissions::get() {
-				let solution = RawSolution { score: [(5 + i).into(), 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+				let solution = RawSolution {
+					score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: (5 + i).into(), ..Default::default() },
+					..Default::default()
+				};
 				assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution));
 			}
 			assert_eq!(
 				MultiPhase::signed_submissions()
 					.iter()
-					.map(|s| s.raw_solution.score[0])
+					.map(|s| s.raw_solution.score.minimal_stake)
 					.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
 				vec![5, 6, 7]
 			);
 
 			// 5 is not accepted. This will only cause processing with no benefit.
-			let solution = RawSolution { score: [5, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+			let solution = RawSolution {
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 5, ..Default::default() },
+				..Default::default()
+			};
 			assert_noop!(
 				submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution),
 				Error::<Runtime>::SignedQueueFull,
@@ -800,13 +833,13 @@ mod tests {
 
 			// make the solution invalidly better and submit. This ought to be slashed.
 			let mut solution_999 = solution.clone();
-			solution_999.score[0] += 1;
+			solution_999.score.minimal_stake += 1;
 			assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(999), solution_999));
 
 			// make the solution invalidly worse and submit. This ought to be suppressed and
 			// returned.
 			let mut solution_9999 = solution.clone();
-			solution_9999.score[0] -= 1;
+			solution_9999.score.minimal_stake -= 1;
 			assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(9999), solution_9999));
 
 			assert_eq!(
@@ -889,13 +922,19 @@ mod tests {
 
 			for s in 0..SignedMaxSubmissions::get() {
 				// score is always getting better
-				let solution = RawSolution { score: [(5 + s).into(), 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+				let solution = RawSolution {
+					score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: (5 + s).into(), ..Default::default() },
+					..Default::default()
+				};
 				assert_ok!(submit_with_witness(Origin::signed(99), solution));
 			}
 
 			// this solution has a higher score than any in the queue
 			let solution = RawSolution {
-				score: [(5 + SignedMaxSubmissions::get()).into(), 0, 0],
+				score: ElectionScore {
+					minimal_stake: (5 + SignedMaxSubmissions::get()).into(),
+					..Default::default()
+				},
 				..Default::default()
 			};
 
diff --git a/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/unsigned.rs b/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/unsigned.rs
index 196147f8a4..510fc9fcdc 100644
--- a/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/unsigned.rs
+++ b/substrate/frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/unsigned.rs
@@ -26,10 +26,9 @@ use codec::Encode;
 use frame_election_provider_support::{NposSolver, PerThing128};
 use frame_support::{dispatch::DispatchResult, ensure, traits::Get};
 use frame_system::offchain::SubmitTransaction;
-use sp_arithmetic::Perbill;
 use sp_npos_elections::{
-	assignment_ratio_to_staked_normalized, assignment_staked_to_ratio_normalized, is_score_better,
-	ElectionResult, NposSolution,
+	assignment_ratio_to_staked_normalized, assignment_staked_to_ratio_normalized, ElectionResult,
+	NposSolution,
 };
 use sp_runtime::{
 	offchain::storage::{MutateStorageError, StorageValueRef},
@@ -624,11 +623,9 @@ impl<T: Config> Pallet<T> {
 
 		// ensure score is being improved. Panic henceforth.
 		ensure!(
-			Self::queued_solution().map_or(true, |q: ReadySolution<_>| is_score_better::<Perbill>(
-				raw_solution.score,
-				q.score,
-				T::SolutionImprovementThreshold::get()
-			)),
+			Self::queued_solution().map_or(true, |q: ReadySolution<_>| raw_solution
+				.score
+				.strict_threshold_better(q.score, T::SolutionImprovementThreshold::get())),
 			Error::<T>::PreDispatchWeakSubmission,
 		);
 
@@ -748,11 +745,11 @@ mod tests {
 	use frame_support::{
 		assert_noop, assert_ok, bounded_vec, dispatch::Dispatchable, traits::OffchainWorker,
 	};
-	use sp_npos_elections::IndexAssignment;
+	use sp_npos_elections::{ElectionScore, IndexAssignment};
 	use sp_runtime::{
 		offchain::storage_lock::{BlockAndTime, StorageLock},
 		traits::ValidateUnsigned,
-		ModuleError, PerU16,
+		ModuleError, PerU16, Perbill,
 	};
 
 	type Assignment = crate::unsigned::Assignment<Runtime>;
@@ -760,8 +757,10 @@ mod tests {
 	#[test]
 	fn validate_unsigned_retracts_wrong_phase() {
 		ExtBuilder::default().desired_targets(0).build_and_execute(|| {
-			let solution =
-				RawSolution::<TestNposSolution> { score: [5, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+			let solution = RawSolution::<TestNposSolution> {
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 5, ..Default::default() },
+				..Default::default()
+			};
 			let call = Call::submit_unsigned {
 				raw_solution: Box::new(solution.clone()),
 				witness: witness(),
@@ -833,8 +832,10 @@ mod tests {
 			roll_to(25);
 			assert!(MultiPhase::current_phase().is_unsigned());
 
-			let solution =
-				RawSolution::<TestNposSolution> { score: [5, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+			let solution = RawSolution::<TestNposSolution> {
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 5, ..Default::default() },
+				..Default::default()
+			};
 			let call = Call::submit_unsigned {
 				raw_solution: Box::new(solution.clone()),
 				witness: witness(),
@@ -849,7 +850,10 @@ mod tests {
 			assert!(<MultiPhase as ValidateUnsigned>::pre_dispatch(&call).is_ok());
 
 			// set a better score
-			let ready = ReadySolution { score: [10, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+			let ready = ReadySolution {
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 10, ..Default::default() },
+				..Default::default()
+			};
 			<QueuedSolution<Runtime>>::put(ready);
 
 			// won't work anymore.
@@ -874,7 +878,10 @@ mod tests {
 			roll_to(25);
 			assert!(MultiPhase::current_phase().is_unsigned());
 
-			let raw = RawSolution::<TestNposSolution> { score: [5, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+			let raw = RawSolution::<TestNposSolution> {
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 5, ..Default::default() },
+				..Default::default()
+			};
 			let call =
 				Call::submit_unsigned { raw_solution: Box::new(raw.clone()), witness: witness() };
 			assert_eq!(raw.solution.unique_targets().len(), 0);
@@ -900,8 +907,10 @@ mod tests {
 				roll_to(25);
 				assert!(MultiPhase::current_phase().is_unsigned());
 
-				let solution =
-					RawSolution::<TestNposSolution> { score: [5, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+				let solution = RawSolution::<TestNposSolution> {
+					score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 5, ..Default::default() },
+					..Default::default()
+				};
 				let call = Call::submit_unsigned {
 					raw_solution: Box::new(solution.clone()),
 					witness: witness(),
@@ -930,8 +939,10 @@ mod tests {
 			assert!(MultiPhase::current_phase().is_unsigned());
 
 			// This is in itself an invalid BS solution.
-			let solution =
-				RawSolution::<TestNposSolution> { score: [5, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+			let solution = RawSolution::<TestNposSolution> {
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 5, ..Default::default() },
+				..Default::default()
+			};
 			let call = Call::submit_unsigned {
 				raw_solution: Box::new(solution.clone()),
 				witness: witness(),
@@ -950,8 +961,10 @@ mod tests {
 			assert!(MultiPhase::current_phase().is_unsigned());
 
 			// This solution is unfeasible as well, but we won't even get there.
-			let solution =
-				RawSolution::<TestNposSolution> { score: [5, 0, 0], ..Default::default() };
+			let solution = RawSolution::<TestNposSolution> {
+				score: ElectionScore { minimal_stake: 5, ..Default::default() },
+				..Default::default()
+			};
 
 			let mut correct_witness = witness();
 			correct_witness.voters += 1;
@@ -1070,7 +1083,7 @@ mod tests {
 					Box::new(solution),
 					witness
 				));
-				assert_eq!(MultiPhase::queued_solution().unwrap().score[0], 10);
+				assert_eq!(MultiPhase::queued_solution().unwrap().score.minimal_stake, 10);
 
 				// trial 1: a solution who's score is only 2, i.e. 20% better in the first element.
 				let result = ElectionResult {
@@ -1086,7 +1099,7 @@ mod tests {
 				};
 				let (solution, _) = MultiPhase::prepare_election_result(result).unwrap();
 				// 12 is not 50% more than 10
-				assert_eq!(solution.score[0], 12);
+				assert_eq!(solution.score.minimal_stake, 12);
 				assert_noop!(
 					MultiPhase::unsigned_pre_dispatch_checks(&solution),
 					Error::<Runtime>::PreDispatchWeakSubmission,
@@ -1107,7 +1120,7 @@ mod tests {
 					],
 				};
 				let (solution, witness) = MultiPhase::prepare_election_result(result).unwrap();
-				assert_eq!(solution.score[0], 17);
+				assert_eq!(solution.score.minimal_stake, 17);
 
 				// and it is fine
 				assert_ok!(MultiPhase::unsigned_pre_dispatch_checks(&solution));
diff --git a/substrate/primitives/arithmetic/src/lib.rs b/substrate/primitives/arithmetic/src/lib.rs
index 92f8a70831..273608a3d1 100644
--- a/substrate/primitives/arithmetic/src/lib.rs
+++ b/substrate/primitives/arithmetic/src/lib.rs
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ use traits::{BaseArithmetic, One, SaturatedConversion, Unsigned, Zero};
 /// - `Ordering::Equal` otherwise.
 pub trait ThresholdOrd<T> {
 	/// Compare if `self` is `threshold` greater or less than `other`.
-	fn tcmp(&self, other: &T, epsilon: T) -> Ordering;
+	fn tcmp(&self, other: &T, threshold: T) -> Ordering;
 }
 
 impl<T> ThresholdOrd<T> for T
diff --git a/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/fuzzer/src/phragmen_balancing.rs b/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/fuzzer/src/phragmen_balancing.rs
index 8f782405df..76641fc2c7 100644
--- a/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/fuzzer/src/phragmen_balancing.rs
+++ b/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/fuzzer/src/phragmen_balancing.rs
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ use common::*;
 use honggfuzz::fuzz;
 use rand::{self, SeedableRng};
 use sp_npos_elections::{
-	assignment_ratio_to_staked_normalized, is_score_better, seq_phragmen, to_supports,
-	ElectionResult, EvaluateSupport, VoteWeight,
+	assignment_ratio_to_staked_normalized, seq_phragmen, to_supports, ElectionResult,
+	EvaluateSupport, VoteWeight,
 };
 use sp_runtime::Perbill;
 
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ fn main() {
 				.unwrap();
 				let score = to_supports(staked.as_ref()).evaluate();
 
-				if score[0] == 0 {
+				if score.minimal_stake == 0 {
 					// such cases cannot be improved by balancing.
 					return
 				}
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ fn main() {
 					to_supports(staked.as_ref()).evaluate()
 				};
 
-				let enhance = is_score_better(balanced_score, unbalanced_score, Perbill::zero());
+				let enhance =
+					balanced_score.strict_threshold_better(unbalanced_score, Perbill::zero());
 
 				println!(
 					"iter = {} // {:?} -> {:?} [{}]",
@@ -90,9 +91,9 @@ fn main() {
 				// The only guarantee of balancing is such that the first and third element of the
 				// score cannot decrease.
 				assert!(
-					balanced_score[0] >= unbalanced_score[0] &&
-						balanced_score[1] == unbalanced_score[1] &&
-						balanced_score[2] <= unbalanced_score[2]
+					balanced_score.minimal_stake >= unbalanced_score.minimal_stake &&
+						balanced_score.sum_stake == unbalanced_score.sum_stake &&
+						balanced_score.sum_stake_squared <= unbalanced_score.sum_stake_squared
 				);
 			}
 		});
diff --git a/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/fuzzer/src/phragmms_balancing.rs b/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/fuzzer/src/phragmms_balancing.rs
index f2b12b1378..09daf3f34d 100644
--- a/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/fuzzer/src/phragmms_balancing.rs
+++ b/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/fuzzer/src/phragmms_balancing.rs
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ use common::*;
 use honggfuzz::fuzz;
 use rand::{self, SeedableRng};
 use sp_npos_elections::{
-	assignment_ratio_to_staked_normalized, is_score_better, phragmms, to_supports, ElectionResult,
-	EvaluateSupport, VoteWeight,
+	assignment_ratio_to_staked_normalized, phragmms, to_supports, ElectionResult, EvaluateSupport,
+	VoteWeight,
 };
 use sp_runtime::Perbill;
 
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ fn main() {
 				.unwrap();
 				let score = to_supports(&staked).evaluate();
 
-				if score[0] == 0 {
+				if score.minimal_stake == 0 {
 					// such cases cannot be improved by balancing.
 					return
 				}
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ fn main() {
 				to_supports(staked.as_ref()).evaluate()
 			};
 
-			let enhance = is_score_better(balanced_score, unbalanced_score, Perbill::zero());
+			let enhance = balanced_score.strict_threshold_better(unbalanced_score, Perbill::zero());
 
 			println!(
 				"iter = {} // {:?} -> {:?} [{}]",
@@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ fn main() {
 			// The only guarantee of balancing is such that the first and third element of the score
 			// cannot decrease.
 			assert!(
-				balanced_score[0] >= unbalanced_score[0] &&
-					balanced_score[1] == unbalanced_score[1] &&
-					balanced_score[2] <= unbalanced_score[2]
+				balanced_score.minimal_stake >= unbalanced_score.minimal_stake &&
+					balanced_score.sum_stake == unbalanced_score.sum_stake &&
+					balanced_score.sum_stake_squared <= unbalanced_score.sum_stake_squared
 			);
 		});
 	}
diff --git a/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/src/lib.rs b/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/src/lib.rs
index 7b3b09a4c7..7bd1a4b7f6 100644
--- a/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/src/lib.rs
+++ b/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/src/lib.rs
@@ -74,11 +74,12 @@
 
 #![cfg_attr(not(feature = "std"), no_std)]
 
+use scale_info::TypeInfo;
 use sp_arithmetic::{traits::Zero, Normalizable, PerThing, Rational128, ThresholdOrd};
 use sp_core::RuntimeDebug;
 use sp_std::{cell::RefCell, cmp::Ordering, collections::btree_map::BTreeMap, prelude::*, rc::Rc};
 
-use codec::{Decode, Encode};
+use codec::{Decode, Encode, MaxEncodedLen};
 #[cfg(feature = "std")]
 use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
 
@@ -144,9 +145,86 @@ pub type VoteWeight = u64;
 /// A type in which performing operations on vote weights are safe.
 pub type ExtendedBalance = u128;
 
-/// The score of an assignment. This can be computed from the support map via
-/// [`EvaluateSupport::evaluate`].
-pub type ElectionScore = [ExtendedBalance; 3];
+/// The score of an election. This is the main measure of an election's quality.
+///
+/// By definition, the order of significance in [`ElectionScore`] is:
+///
+/// 1. `minimal_stake`.
+/// 2. `sum_stake`.
+/// 3. `sum_stake_squared`.
+#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Encode, Decode, MaxEncodedLen, TypeInfo, Debug, Default)]
+#[cfg_attr(feature = "std", derive(Serialize, Deserialize))]
+pub struct ElectionScore {
+	/// The minimal winner, in terms of total backing stake.
+	///
+	/// This parameter should be maximized.
+	pub minimal_stake: ExtendedBalance,
+	/// The sum of the total backing of all winners.
+	///
+	/// This parameter should maximized
+	pub sum_stake: ExtendedBalance,
+	/// The sum squared of the total backing of all winners, aka. the variance.
+	///
+	/// Ths parameter should be minimized.
+	pub sum_stake_squared: ExtendedBalance,
+}
+
+impl ElectionScore {
+	/// Iterate over the inner items, first visiting the most significant one.
+	fn iter_by_significance(self) -> impl Iterator<Item = ExtendedBalance> {
+		[self.minimal_stake, self.sum_stake, self.sum_stake_squared].into_iter()
+	}
+
+	/// Compares two sets of election scores based on desirability, returning true if `self` is
+	/// strictly `threshold` better than `other`. In other words, each element of `self` must be
+	/// `self * threshold` better than `other`.
+	///
+	/// Evaluation is done based on the order of significance of the fields of [`ElectionScore`].
+	pub fn strict_threshold_better(self, other: Self, threshold: impl PerThing) -> bool {
+		match self
+			.iter_by_significance()
+			.zip(other.iter_by_significance())
+			.map(|(this, that)| (this.ge(&that), this.tcmp(&that, threshold.mul_ceil(that))))
+			.collect::<Vec<(bool, Ordering)>>()
+			.as_slice()
+		{
+			// threshold better in the `score.minimal_stake`, accept.
+			[(x, Ordering::Greater), _, _] => {
+				debug_assert!(x);
+				true
+			},
+
+			// less than threshold better in `score.minimal_stake`, but more than threshold better
+			// in `score.sum_stake`.
+			[(true, Ordering::Equal), (_, Ordering::Greater), _] => true,
+
+			// less than threshold better in `score.minimal_stake` and `score.sum_stake`, but more
+			// than threshold better in `score.sum_stake_squared`.
+			[(true, Ordering::Equal), (true, Ordering::Equal), (_, Ordering::Less)] => true,
+
+			// anything else is not a good score.
+			_ => false,
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+impl sp_std::cmp::Ord for ElectionScore {
+	fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Ordering {
+		// we delegate this to the lexicographic cmp of slices`, and to incorporate that we want the
+		// third element to be minimized, we swap them.
+		[self.minimal_stake, self.sum_stake, other.sum_stake_squared].cmp(&[
+			other.minimal_stake,
+			other.sum_stake,
+			self.sum_stake_squared,
+		])
+	}
+}
+
+impl sp_std::cmp::PartialOrd for ElectionScore {
+	fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Option<Ordering> {
+		Some(self.cmp(other))
+	}
+}
 
 /// A pointer to a candidate struct with interior mutability.
 pub type CandidatePtr<A> = Rc<RefCell<Candidate<A>>>;
@@ -353,7 +431,7 @@ pub struct ElectionResult<AccountId, P: PerThing> {
 ///
 /// This, at the current version, resembles the `Exposure` defined in the Staking pallet, yet they
 /// do not necessarily have to be the same.
-#[derive(RuntimeDebug, Encode, Decode, Clone, Eq, PartialEq, scale_info::TypeInfo)]
+#[derive(RuntimeDebug, Encode, Decode, Clone, Eq, PartialEq, TypeInfo)]
 #[cfg_attr(feature = "std", derive(Serialize, Deserialize))]
 pub struct Support<AccountId> {
 	/// Total support.
@@ -418,49 +496,22 @@ pub trait EvaluateSupport {
 
 impl<AccountId: IdentifierT> EvaluateSupport for Supports<AccountId> {
 	fn evaluate(&self) -> ElectionScore {
-		let mut min_support = ExtendedBalance::max_value();
-		let mut sum: ExtendedBalance = Zero::zero();
+		let mut minimal_stake = ExtendedBalance::max_value();
+		let mut sum_stake: ExtendedBalance = Zero::zero();
 		// NOTE: The third element might saturate but fine for now since this will run on-chain and
 		// need to be fast.
-		let mut sum_squared: ExtendedBalance = Zero::zero();
+		let mut sum_stake_squared: ExtendedBalance = Zero::zero();
+
 		for (_, support) in self {
-			sum = sum.saturating_add(support.total);
+			sum_stake = sum_stake.saturating_add(support.total);
 			let squared = support.total.saturating_mul(support.total);
-			sum_squared = sum_squared.saturating_add(squared);
-			if support.total < min_support {
-				min_support = support.total;
+			sum_stake_squared = sum_stake_squared.saturating_add(squared);
+			if support.total < minimal_stake {
+				minimal_stake = support.total;
 			}
 		}
-		[min_support, sum, sum_squared]
-	}
-}
 
-/// Compares two sets of election scores based on desirability and returns true if `this` is better
-/// than `that`.
-///
-/// Evaluation is done in a lexicographic manner, and if each element of `this` is `that * epsilon`
-/// greater or less than `that`.
-///
-/// Note that the third component should be minimized.
-pub fn is_score_better<P: PerThing>(this: ElectionScore, that: ElectionScore, epsilon: P) -> bool {
-	match this
-		.iter()
-		.zip(that.iter())
-		.map(|(thi, tha)| (thi.ge(&tha), thi.tcmp(&tha, epsilon.mul_ceil(*tha))))
-		.collect::<Vec<(bool, Ordering)>>()
-		.as_slice()
-	{
-		// epsilon better in the score[0], accept.
-		[(_, Ordering::Greater), _, _] => true,
-
-		// less than epsilon better in score[0], but more than epsilon better in the second.
-		[(true, Ordering::Equal), (_, Ordering::Greater), _] => true,
-
-		// less than epsilon better in score[0, 1], but more than epsilon better in the third
-		[(true, Ordering::Equal), (true, Ordering::Equal), (_, Ordering::Less)] => true,
-
-		// anything else is not a good score.
-		_ => false,
+		ElectionScore { minimal_stake, sum_stake, sum_stake_squared }
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/src/tests.rs b/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/src/tests.rs
index c6748b29e9..b199fdd1af 100644
--- a/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/src/tests.rs
+++ b/substrate/primitives/npos-elections/src/tests.rs
@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@
 //! Tests for npos-elections.
 
 use crate::{
-	balancing, helpers::*, is_score_better, mock::*, seq_phragmen, seq_phragmen_core, setup_inputs,
-	to_support_map, Assignment, ElectionResult, ExtendedBalance, IndexAssignment, NposSolution,
-	StakedAssignment, Support, Voter,
+	balancing, helpers::*, mock::*, seq_phragmen, seq_phragmen_core, setup_inputs, to_support_map,
+	Assignment, ElectionResult, ExtendedBalance, IndexAssignment, NposSolution, StakedAssignment,
+	Support, Voter,
 };
 use rand::{self, SeedableRng};
 use sp_arithmetic::{PerU16, Perbill, Percent, Permill};
@@ -792,6 +792,21 @@ mod assignment_convert_normalize {
 
 mod score {
 	use super::*;
+	use crate::ElectionScore;
+	use sp_arithmetic::PerThing;
+
+	/// NOTE: in tests, we still use the legacy [u128; 3] since it is more compact. Each `u128`
+	/// corresponds to element at the respective field index of `ElectionScore`.
+	impl From<[ExtendedBalance; 3]> for ElectionScore {
+		fn from(t: [ExtendedBalance; 3]) -> Self {
+			Self { minimal_stake: t[0], sum_stake: t[1], sum_stake_squared: t[2] }
+		}
+	}
+
+	fn is_score_better(this: [u128; 3], that: [u128; 3], p: impl PerThing) -> bool {
+		ElectionScore::from(this).strict_threshold_better(ElectionScore::from(that), p)
+	}
+
 	#[test]
 	fn score_comparison_is_lexicographical_no_epsilon() {
 		let epsilon = Perbill::zero();
@@ -883,6 +898,26 @@ mod score {
 			false,
 		);
 	}
+
+	#[test]
+	fn ord_works() {
+		// equal only when all elements are equal
+		assert!(ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 15]) == ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 15]));
+		assert!(ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 15]) != ElectionScore::from([9, 5, 15]));
+		assert!(ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 15]) != ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 14]));
+
+		// first element greater, rest don't matter
+		assert!(ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 15]) > ElectionScore::from([8, 5, 25]));
+		assert!(ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 15]) > ElectionScore::from([9, 20, 5]));
+
+		// second element greater, rest don't matter
+		assert!(ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 15]) > ElectionScore::from([10, 4, 25]));
+		assert!(ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 15]) > ElectionScore::from([10, 4, 5]));
+
+		// second element is less, rest don't matter. Note that this is swapped.
+		assert!(ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 15]) > ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 16]));
+		assert!(ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 15]) > ElectionScore::from([10, 5, 25]));
+	}
 }
 
 mod solution_type {