inherent disputes: remove per block initializer and disputes timeout event (#6937)

* Limit disputes weight and remove initializer code

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* const

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* remove timeout test

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* review feedback #1

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* Remove the new weight limiting for disputes

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* cargo lock

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* Remove dispute_conclusion_by_time_out_period

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* Enable migrations

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* Update guide

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* Fix comment

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* More guide fixes

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* Also migrate pending configs

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* fix build

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

* fix test

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
This commit is contained in:
Andrei Sandu
2023-03-24 13:48:56 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent 95f0ca271e
commit bd209c2d70
13 changed files with 116 additions and 266 deletions
@@ -329,131 +329,6 @@ fn test_import_backing_votes() {
);
}
// Test that dispute timeout is handled correctly.
#[test]
fn test_dispute_timeout() {
let dispute_conclusion_by_time_out_period = 3;
let start = 10;
let mock_genesis_config = MockGenesisConfig {
configuration: crate::configuration::GenesisConfig {
config: HostConfiguration {
dispute_conclusion_by_time_out_period,
..Default::default()
},
..Default::default()
},
..Default::default()
};
new_test_ext(mock_genesis_config).execute_with(|| {
// We need 7 validators for the byzantine threshold to be 2
let v0 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v1 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v2 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v3 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v4 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v5 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
let v6 = <ValidatorId as CryptoType>::Pair::generate().0;
run_to_block(start, |b| {
// a new session at each block
Some((
true,
b,
vec![
(&0, v0.public()),
(&1, v1.public()),
(&2, v2.public()),
(&3, v3.public()),
(&4, v4.public()),
(&5, v5.public()),
(&6, v6.public()),
],
Some(vec![
(&0, v0.public()),
(&1, v1.public()),
(&2, v2.public()),
(&3, v3.public()),
(&4, v4.public()),
(&5, v5.public()),
(&6, v6.public()),
]),
))
});
let candidate_hash = CandidateHash(sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(1));
let inclusion_parent = sp_core::H256::repeat_byte(0xff);
// v0 and v1 vote for 3, v2 against. We need f+1 votes (3) so that the dispute is
// confirmed. Otherwise It will be filtered out.
let session = start - 1;
let stmts = vec![DisputeStatementSet {
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session,
statements: vec![
(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::BackingValid(
inclusion_parent,
)),
ValidatorIndex(0),
v0.sign(&CompactStatement::Valid(candidate_hash).signing_payload(
&SigningContext { session_index: start - 1, parent_hash: inclusion_parent },
)),
),
(
DisputeStatement::Valid(ValidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(1),
v1.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: true,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: start - 1,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
),
(
DisputeStatement::Invalid(InvalidDisputeStatementKind::Explicit),
ValidatorIndex(6),
v2.sign(
&ExplicitDisputeStatement {
valid: false,
candidate_hash: candidate_hash.clone(),
session: start - 1,
}
.signing_payload(),
),
),
],
}];
let stmts = filter_dispute_set(stmts);
assert_ok!(
Pallet::<Test>::process_checked_multi_dispute_data(&stmts),
vec![(9, candidate_hash.clone())],
);
// Run to timeout period
run_to_block(start + dispute_conclusion_by_time_out_period, |_| None);
assert!(<Disputes<Test>>::get(&session, &candidate_hash)
.expect("dispute should exist")
.concluded_at
.is_none());
// Run to timeout + 1 in order to executive on_finalize(timeout)
run_to_block(start + dispute_conclusion_by_time_out_period + 1, |_| None);
assert_eq!(
<Disputes<Test>>::get(&session, &candidate_hash)
.expect("dispute should exist")
.concluded_at
.expect("dispute should have concluded"),
start + dispute_conclusion_by_time_out_period + 1
);
});
}
// Test pruning works
#[test]
fn test_initializer_on_new_session() {