mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-06-14 11:01:08 +00:00
BEEFY: implement equivocations detection, reporting and slashing (#13121)
* client/beefy: simplify self_vote logic * client/beefy: migrate to new state version * client/beefy: detect equivocated votes * fix typos * sp-beefy: add equivocation primitives * client/beefy: refactor vote processing * fix version migration for new rounds struct * client/beefy: track equivocations and create proofs * client/beefy: adjust tests for new voting logic * sp-beefy: fix commitment ordering and equality * client/beefy: simplify handle_vote() a bit * client/beefy: add simple equivocation test * client/beefy: submit equivocation proof - WIP * frame/beefy: add equivocation report runtime api - part 1 * frame/beefy: report equivocation logic - part 2 * frame/beefy: add pluggable Equivocation handler - part 3 * frame/beefy: impl ValidateUnsigned for equivocations reporting * client/beefy: submit report equivocation unsigned extrinsic * primitives/beefy: fix tests * frame/beefy: add default weights * frame/beefy: fix tests * client/beefy: fix tests * frame/beefy-mmr: fix tests * frame/beefy: cross-check session index with equivocation report * sp-beefy: make test Keyring useable in pallet * frame/beefy: add basic equivocation test * frame/beefy: test verify equivocation results in slashing * frame/beefy: test report_equivocation_old_set * frame/beefy: add more equivocation tests * sp-beefy: fix docs * beefy: simplify equivocations and fix tests * client/beefy: address review comments * frame/beefy: add ValidateUnsigned to test/mock runtime * client/beefy: fixes after merge master * fix missed merge damage * client/beefy: add test for reporting equivocations Also validated there's no unexpected equivocations reported in the other tests. Signed-off-by: acatangiu <adrian@parity.io> * sp-beefy: move test utils to their own file * client/beefy: add negative test for equivocation reports * sp-beefy: move back MmrRootProvider - used in polkadot-service * impl review suggestions * client/beefy: add equivocation metrics --------- Signed-off-by: acatangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,14 +17,21 @@
|
||||
|
||||
use std::vec;
|
||||
|
||||
use beefy_primitives::ValidatorSet;
|
||||
use beefy_primitives::{
|
||||
check_equivocation_proof, generate_equivocation_proof, known_payloads::MMR_ROOT_ID,
|
||||
Keyring as BeefyKeyring, Payload, ValidatorSet,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use codec::Encode;
|
||||
|
||||
use sp_runtime::DigestItem;
|
||||
|
||||
use frame_support::traits::OnInitialize;
|
||||
use frame_support::{
|
||||
assert_err, assert_ok,
|
||||
dispatch::{GetDispatchInfo, Pays},
|
||||
traits::{Currency, KeyOwnerProofSystem, OnInitialize},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::mock::*;
|
||||
use crate::{mock::*, Call, Config, Error, Weight, WeightInfo};
|
||||
|
||||
fn init_block(block: u64) {
|
||||
System::set_block_number(block);
|
||||
@@ -37,12 +44,13 @@ pub fn beefy_log(log: ConsensusLog<BeefyId>) -> DigestItem {
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn genesis_session_initializes_authorities() {
|
||||
let want = vec![mock_beefy_id(1), mock_beefy_id(2), mock_beefy_id(3), mock_beefy_id(4)];
|
||||
let authorities = mock_authorities(vec![1, 2, 3, 4]);
|
||||
let want = authorities.clone();
|
||||
|
||||
new_test_ext(vec![1, 2, 3, 4]).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
let authorities = Beefy::authorities();
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(authorities.len() == 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(authorities.len(), 4);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[0], authorities[0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[1], authorities[1]);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -50,7 +58,7 @@ fn genesis_session_initializes_authorities() {
|
||||
|
||||
let next_authorities = Beefy::next_authorities();
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(next_authorities.len() == 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(next_authorities.len(), 4);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[0], next_authorities[0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[1], next_authorities[1]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -58,6 +66,9 @@ fn genesis_session_initializes_authorities() {
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn session_change_updates_authorities() {
|
||||
let authorities = mock_authorities(vec![1, 2, 3, 4]);
|
||||
let want_validators = authorities.clone();
|
||||
|
||||
new_test_ext(vec![1, 2, 3, 4]).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
assert!(0 == Beefy::validator_set_id());
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -66,7 +77,7 @@ fn session_change_updates_authorities() {
|
||||
assert!(1 == Beefy::validator_set_id());
|
||||
|
||||
let want = beefy_log(ConsensusLog::AuthoritiesChange(
|
||||
ValidatorSet::new(vec![mock_beefy_id(1), mock_beefy_id(2)], 1).unwrap(),
|
||||
ValidatorSet::new(want_validators, 1).unwrap(),
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
let log = System::digest().logs[0].clone();
|
||||
@@ -77,7 +88,7 @@ fn session_change_updates_authorities() {
|
||||
assert!(2 == Beefy::validator_set_id());
|
||||
|
||||
let want = beefy_log(ConsensusLog::AuthoritiesChange(
|
||||
ValidatorSet::new(vec![mock_beefy_id(3), mock_beefy_id(4)], 2).unwrap(),
|
||||
ValidatorSet::new(vec![mock_beefy_id(2), mock_beefy_id(4)], 2).unwrap(),
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
let log = System::digest().logs[1].clone();
|
||||
@@ -92,16 +103,18 @@ fn session_change_updates_next_authorities() {
|
||||
new_test_ext(vec![1, 2, 3, 4]).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
let next_authorities = Beefy::next_authorities();
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(next_authorities.len() == 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(next_authorities.len(), 4);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[0], next_authorities[0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[1], next_authorities[1]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[2], next_authorities[2]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[3], next_authorities[3]);
|
||||
|
||||
init_block(1);
|
||||
|
||||
let next_authorities = Beefy::next_authorities();
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(next_authorities.len() == 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[2], next_authorities[0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(next_authorities.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[1], next_authorities[0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[3], next_authorities[1]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -126,6 +139,10 @@ fn validator_set_updates_work() {
|
||||
new_test_ext(vec![1, 2, 3, 4]).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
let vs = Beefy::validator_set().unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(vs.id(), 0u64);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[0], vs.validators()[0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[1], vs.validators()[1]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[2], vs.validators()[2]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[3], vs.validators()[3]);
|
||||
|
||||
init_block(1);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -140,7 +157,611 @@ fn validator_set_updates_work() {
|
||||
let vs = Beefy::validator_set().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(vs.id(), 2u64);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[2], vs.validators()[0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[1], vs.validators()[0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(want[3], vs.validators()[1]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns a list with 3 authorities with known keys:
|
||||
/// Alice, Bob and Charlie.
|
||||
pub fn test_authorities() -> Vec<BeefyId> {
|
||||
let authorities = vec![BeefyKeyring::Alice, BeefyKeyring::Bob, BeefyKeyring::Charlie];
|
||||
authorities.into_iter().map(|id| id.public()).collect()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn should_sign_and_verify() {
|
||||
use sp_runtime::traits::Keccak256;
|
||||
|
||||
let set_id = 3;
|
||||
let payload1 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![42]);
|
||||
let payload2 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![128]);
|
||||
|
||||
// generate an equivocation proof, with two votes in the same round for
|
||||
// same payload signed by the same key
|
||||
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(1, payload1.clone(), set_id, &BeefyKeyring::Bob),
|
||||
(1, payload1.clone(), set_id, &BeefyKeyring::Bob),
|
||||
);
|
||||
// expect invalid equivocation proof
|
||||
assert!(!check_equivocation_proof::<_, _, Keccak256>(&equivocation_proof));
|
||||
|
||||
// generate an equivocation proof, with two votes in different rounds for
|
||||
// different payloads signed by the same key
|
||||
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(1, payload1.clone(), set_id, &BeefyKeyring::Bob),
|
||||
(2, payload2.clone(), set_id, &BeefyKeyring::Bob),
|
||||
);
|
||||
// expect invalid equivocation proof
|
||||
assert!(!check_equivocation_proof::<_, _, Keccak256>(&equivocation_proof));
|
||||
|
||||
// generate an equivocation proof, with two votes by different authorities
|
||||
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(1, payload1.clone(), set_id, &BeefyKeyring::Alice),
|
||||
(1, payload2.clone(), set_id, &BeefyKeyring::Bob),
|
||||
);
|
||||
// expect invalid equivocation proof
|
||||
assert!(!check_equivocation_proof::<_, _, Keccak256>(&equivocation_proof));
|
||||
|
||||
// generate an equivocation proof, with two votes in different set ids
|
||||
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(1, payload1.clone(), set_id, &BeefyKeyring::Bob),
|
||||
(1, payload2.clone(), set_id + 1, &BeefyKeyring::Bob),
|
||||
);
|
||||
// expect invalid equivocation proof
|
||||
assert!(!check_equivocation_proof::<_, _, Keccak256>(&equivocation_proof));
|
||||
|
||||
// generate an equivocation proof, with two votes in the same round for
|
||||
// different payloads signed by the same key
|
||||
let payload2 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![128]);
|
||||
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(1, payload1, set_id, &BeefyKeyring::Bob),
|
||||
(1, payload2, set_id, &BeefyKeyring::Bob),
|
||||
);
|
||||
// expect valid equivocation proof
|
||||
assert!(check_equivocation_proof::<_, _, Keccak256>(&equivocation_proof));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn report_equivocation_current_set_works() {
|
||||
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
||||
|
||||
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), Some(0));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
start_era(1);
|
||||
|
||||
let block_num = System::block_number();
|
||||
let validator_set = Beefy::validator_set().unwrap();
|
||||
let authorities = validator_set.validators();
|
||||
let set_id = validator_set.id();
|
||||
let validators = Session::validators();
|
||||
|
||||
// make sure that all validators have the same balance
|
||||
for validator in &validators {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(validator), 10_000_000);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(validator), 10_000);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Staking::eras_stakers(1, validator),
|
||||
pallet_staking::Exposure { total: 10_000, own: 10_000, others: vec![] },
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(authorities.len(), 2);
|
||||
let equivocation_authority_index = 1;
|
||||
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index];
|
||||
let equivocation_keyring = BeefyKeyring::from_public(equivocation_key).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let payload1 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![42]);
|
||||
let payload2 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![128]);
|
||||
// generate an equivocation proof, with two votes in the same round for
|
||||
// different payloads signed by the same key
|
||||
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(block_num, payload1, set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
(block_num, payload2, set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// create the key ownership proof
|
||||
let key_owner_proof =
|
||||
Historical::prove((beefy_primitives::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// report the equivocation and the tx should be dispatched successfully
|
||||
assert_ok!(Beefy::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
||||
RuntimeOrigin::none(),
|
||||
Box::new(equivocation_proof),
|
||||
key_owner_proof,
|
||||
),);
|
||||
|
||||
start_era(2);
|
||||
|
||||
// check that the balance of 0-th validator is slashed 100%.
|
||||
let equivocation_validator_id = validators[equivocation_authority_index];
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&equivocation_validator_id), 10_000_000 - 10_000);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&equivocation_validator_id), 0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Staking::eras_stakers(2, equivocation_validator_id),
|
||||
pallet_staking::Exposure { total: 0, own: 0, others: vec![] },
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// check that the balances of all other validators are left intact.
|
||||
for validator in &validators {
|
||||
if *validator == equivocation_validator_id {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(validator), 10_000_000);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(validator), 10_000);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Staking::eras_stakers(2, validator),
|
||||
pallet_staking::Exposure { total: 10_000, own: 10_000, others: vec![] },
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn report_equivocation_old_set_works() {
|
||||
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
||||
|
||||
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
start_era(1);
|
||||
|
||||
let block_num = System::block_number();
|
||||
let validator_set = Beefy::validator_set().unwrap();
|
||||
let authorities = validator_set.validators();
|
||||
let validators = Session::validators();
|
||||
let old_set_id = validator_set.id();
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(authorities.len(), 2);
|
||||
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
||||
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index];
|
||||
|
||||
// create the key ownership proof in the "old" set
|
||||
let key_owner_proof =
|
||||
Historical::prove((beefy_primitives::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
start_era(2);
|
||||
|
||||
// make sure that all authorities have the same balance
|
||||
for validator in &validators {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(validator), 10_000_000);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(validator), 10_000);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Staking::eras_stakers(2, validator),
|
||||
pallet_staking::Exposure { total: 10_000, own: 10_000, others: vec![] },
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let validator_set = Beefy::validator_set().unwrap();
|
||||
let new_set_id = validator_set.id();
|
||||
assert_eq!(old_set_id + 3, new_set_id);
|
||||
|
||||
let equivocation_keyring = BeefyKeyring::from_public(equivocation_key).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let payload1 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![42]);
|
||||
let payload2 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![128]);
|
||||
// generate an equivocation proof for the old set,
|
||||
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(block_num, payload1, old_set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
(block_num, payload2, old_set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// report the equivocation and the tx should be dispatched successfully
|
||||
assert_ok!(Beefy::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
||||
RuntimeOrigin::none(),
|
||||
Box::new(equivocation_proof),
|
||||
key_owner_proof,
|
||||
),);
|
||||
|
||||
start_era(3);
|
||||
|
||||
// check that the balance of 0-th validator is slashed 100%.
|
||||
let equivocation_validator_id = validators[equivocation_authority_index];
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&equivocation_validator_id), 10_000_000 - 10_000);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&equivocation_validator_id), 0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Staking::eras_stakers(3, equivocation_validator_id),
|
||||
pallet_staking::Exposure { total: 0, own: 0, others: vec![] },
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// check that the balances of all other validators are left intact.
|
||||
for validator in &validators {
|
||||
if *validator == equivocation_validator_id {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(validator), 10_000_000);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(validator), 10_000);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Staking::eras_stakers(3, validator),
|
||||
pallet_staking::Exposure { total: 10_000, own: 10_000, others: vec![] },
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn report_equivocation_invalid_set_id() {
|
||||
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
||||
|
||||
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
start_era(1);
|
||||
|
||||
let block_num = System::block_number();
|
||||
let validator_set = Beefy::validator_set().unwrap();
|
||||
let authorities = validator_set.validators();
|
||||
let set_id = validator_set.id();
|
||||
|
||||
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
||||
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index];
|
||||
let equivocation_keyring = BeefyKeyring::from_public(equivocation_key).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let key_owner_proof =
|
||||
Historical::prove((beefy_primitives::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let payload1 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![42]);
|
||||
let payload2 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![128]);
|
||||
// generate an equivocation for a future set
|
||||
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(block_num, payload1, set_id + 1, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
(block_num, payload2, set_id + 1, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// the call for reporting the equivocation should error
|
||||
assert_err!(
|
||||
Beefy::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
||||
RuntimeOrigin::none(),
|
||||
Box::new(equivocation_proof),
|
||||
key_owner_proof,
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error::<Test>::InvalidEquivocationProof,
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn report_equivocation_invalid_session() {
|
||||
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
||||
|
||||
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
start_era(1);
|
||||
|
||||
let block_num = System::block_number();
|
||||
let validator_set = Beefy::validator_set().unwrap();
|
||||
let authorities = validator_set.validators();
|
||||
|
||||
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
||||
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index];
|
||||
let equivocation_keyring = BeefyKeyring::from_public(equivocation_key).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// generate a key ownership proof at current era set id
|
||||
let key_owner_proof =
|
||||
Historical::prove((beefy_primitives::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
start_era(2);
|
||||
|
||||
let set_id = Beefy::validator_set().unwrap().id();
|
||||
|
||||
let payload1 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![42]);
|
||||
let payload2 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![128]);
|
||||
// generate an equivocation proof at following era set id = 2
|
||||
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(block_num, payload1, set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
(block_num, payload2, set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// report an equivocation for the current set using an key ownership
|
||||
// proof from the previous set, the session should be invalid.
|
||||
assert_err!(
|
||||
Beefy::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
||||
RuntimeOrigin::none(),
|
||||
Box::new(equivocation_proof),
|
||||
key_owner_proof,
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error::<Test>::InvalidEquivocationProof,
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn report_equivocation_invalid_key_owner_proof() {
|
||||
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
||||
|
||||
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
start_era(1);
|
||||
|
||||
let block_num = System::block_number();
|
||||
let validator_set = Beefy::validator_set().unwrap();
|
||||
let authorities = validator_set.validators();
|
||||
let set_id = validator_set.id();
|
||||
|
||||
let invalid_owner_authority_index = 1;
|
||||
let invalid_owner_key = &authorities[invalid_owner_authority_index];
|
||||
|
||||
// generate a key ownership proof for the authority at index 1
|
||||
let invalid_key_owner_proof =
|
||||
Historical::prove((beefy_primitives::KEY_TYPE, &invalid_owner_key)).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
||||
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index];
|
||||
let equivocation_keyring = BeefyKeyring::from_public(equivocation_key).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let payload1 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![42]);
|
||||
let payload2 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![128]);
|
||||
// generate an equivocation proof for the authority at index 0
|
||||
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(block_num, payload1, set_id + 1, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
(block_num, payload2, set_id + 1, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// we need to start a new era otherwise the key ownership proof won't be
|
||||
// checked since the authorities are part of the current session
|
||||
start_era(2);
|
||||
|
||||
// report an equivocation for the current set using a key ownership
|
||||
// proof for a different key than the one in the equivocation proof.
|
||||
assert_err!(
|
||||
Beefy::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
||||
RuntimeOrigin::none(),
|
||||
Box::new(equivocation_proof),
|
||||
invalid_key_owner_proof,
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error::<Test>::InvalidKeyOwnershipProof,
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn report_equivocation_invalid_equivocation_proof() {
|
||||
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
||||
|
||||
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
start_era(1);
|
||||
|
||||
let block_num = System::block_number();
|
||||
let validator_set = Beefy::validator_set().unwrap();
|
||||
let authorities = validator_set.validators();
|
||||
let set_id = validator_set.id();
|
||||
|
||||
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
||||
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index];
|
||||
let equivocation_keyring = BeefyKeyring::from_public(equivocation_key).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// generate a key ownership proof at set id in era 1
|
||||
let key_owner_proof =
|
||||
Historical::prove((beefy_primitives::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let assert_invalid_equivocation_proof = |equivocation_proof| {
|
||||
assert_err!(
|
||||
Beefy::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
||||
RuntimeOrigin::none(),
|
||||
Box::new(equivocation_proof),
|
||||
key_owner_proof.clone(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
Error::<Test>::InvalidEquivocationProof,
|
||||
);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
start_era(2);
|
||||
|
||||
let payload1 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![42]);
|
||||
let payload2 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![128]);
|
||||
|
||||
// both votes target the same block number and payload,
|
||||
// there is no equivocation.
|
||||
assert_invalid_equivocation_proof(generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(block_num, payload1.clone(), set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
(block_num, payload1.clone(), set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
// votes targeting different rounds, there is no equivocation.
|
||||
assert_invalid_equivocation_proof(generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(block_num, payload1.clone(), set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
(block_num + 1, payload2.clone(), set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
// votes signed with different authority keys
|
||||
assert_invalid_equivocation_proof(generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(block_num, payload1.clone(), set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
(block_num, payload1.clone(), set_id, &BeefyKeyring::Charlie),
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
// votes signed with a key that isn't part of the authority set
|
||||
assert_invalid_equivocation_proof(generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(block_num, payload1.clone(), set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
(block_num, payload1.clone(), set_id, &BeefyKeyring::Dave),
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
// votes targeting different set ids
|
||||
assert_invalid_equivocation_proof(generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(block_num, payload1, set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
(block_num, payload2, set_id + 1, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
));
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn report_equivocation_validate_unsigned_prevents_duplicates() {
|
||||
use sp_runtime::transaction_validity::{
|
||||
InvalidTransaction, TransactionPriority, TransactionSource, TransactionValidity,
|
||||
ValidTransaction,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
||||
|
||||
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
start_era(1);
|
||||
|
||||
let block_num = System::block_number();
|
||||
let validator_set = Beefy::validator_set().unwrap();
|
||||
let authorities = validator_set.validators();
|
||||
let set_id = validator_set.id();
|
||||
|
||||
// generate and report an equivocation for the validator at index 0
|
||||
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
||||
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index];
|
||||
let equivocation_keyring = BeefyKeyring::from_public(equivocation_key).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let payload1 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![42]);
|
||||
let payload2 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![128]);
|
||||
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(block_num, payload1, set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
(block_num, payload2, set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let key_owner_proof =
|
||||
Historical::prove((beefy_primitives::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let call = Call::report_equivocation_unsigned {
|
||||
equivocation_proof: Box::new(equivocation_proof.clone()),
|
||||
key_owner_proof: key_owner_proof.clone(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// only local/inblock reports are allowed
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
<Beefy as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
|
||||
TransactionSource::External,
|
||||
&call,
|
||||
),
|
||||
InvalidTransaction::Call.into(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// the transaction is valid when passed as local
|
||||
let tx_tag = (equivocation_key, set_id, 3u64);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
<Beefy as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
|
||||
TransactionSource::Local,
|
||||
&call,
|
||||
),
|
||||
TransactionValidity::Ok(ValidTransaction {
|
||||
priority: TransactionPriority::max_value(),
|
||||
requires: vec![],
|
||||
provides: vec![("BeefyEquivocation", tx_tag).encode()],
|
||||
longevity: ReportLongevity::get(),
|
||||
propagate: false,
|
||||
})
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// the pre dispatch checks should also pass
|
||||
assert_ok!(<Beefy as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::pre_dispatch(&call));
|
||||
|
||||
// we submit the report
|
||||
Beefy::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
||||
RuntimeOrigin::none(),
|
||||
Box::new(equivocation_proof),
|
||||
key_owner_proof,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// the report should now be considered stale and the transaction is invalid
|
||||
// the check for staleness should be done on both `validate_unsigned` and on `pre_dispatch`
|
||||
assert_err!(
|
||||
<Beefy as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
|
||||
TransactionSource::Local,
|
||||
&call,
|
||||
),
|
||||
InvalidTransaction::Stale,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_err!(
|
||||
<Beefy as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::pre_dispatch(&call),
|
||||
InvalidTransaction::Stale,
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn report_equivocation_has_valid_weight() {
|
||||
// the weight depends on the size of the validator set,
|
||||
// but there's a lower bound of 100 validators.
|
||||
assert!((1..=100)
|
||||
.map(<Test as Config>::WeightInfo::report_equivocation)
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
|
||||
.windows(2)
|
||||
.all(|w| w[0] == w[1]));
|
||||
|
||||
// after 100 validators the weight should keep increasing
|
||||
// with every extra validator.
|
||||
assert!((100..=1000)
|
||||
.map(<Test as Config>::WeightInfo::report_equivocation)
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
|
||||
.windows(2)
|
||||
.all(|w| w[0].ref_time() < w[1].ref_time()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn valid_equivocation_reports_dont_pay_fees() {
|
||||
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
||||
|
||||
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
||||
start_era(1);
|
||||
|
||||
let block_num = System::block_number();
|
||||
let validator_set = Beefy::validator_set().unwrap();
|
||||
let authorities = validator_set.validators();
|
||||
let set_id = validator_set.id();
|
||||
|
||||
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
||||
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index];
|
||||
let equivocation_keyring = BeefyKeyring::from_public(equivocation_key).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// generate equivocation proof
|
||||
let payload1 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![42]);
|
||||
let payload2 = Payload::from_single_entry(MMR_ROOT_ID, vec![128]);
|
||||
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
||||
(block_num, payload1, set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
(block_num, payload2, set_id, &equivocation_keyring),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// create the key ownership proof.
|
||||
let key_owner_proof =
|
||||
Historical::prove((beefy_primitives::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// check the dispatch info for the call.
|
||||
let info = Call::<Test>::report_equivocation_unsigned {
|
||||
equivocation_proof: Box::new(equivocation_proof.clone()),
|
||||
key_owner_proof: key_owner_proof.clone(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
.get_dispatch_info();
|
||||
|
||||
// it should have non-zero weight and the fee has to be paid.
|
||||
assert!(info.weight.any_gt(Weight::zero()));
|
||||
assert_eq!(info.pays_fee, Pays::Yes);
|
||||
|
||||
// report the equivocation.
|
||||
let post_info = Beefy::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
||||
RuntimeOrigin::none(),
|
||||
Box::new(equivocation_proof.clone()),
|
||||
key_owner_proof.clone(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// the original weight should be kept, but given that the report
|
||||
// is valid the fee is waived.
|
||||
assert!(post_info.actual_weight.is_none());
|
||||
assert_eq!(post_info.pays_fee, Pays::No);
|
||||
|
||||
// report the equivocation again which is invalid now since it is
|
||||
// duplicate.
|
||||
let post_info = Beefy::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
||||
RuntimeOrigin::none(),
|
||||
Box::new(equivocation_proof),
|
||||
key_owner_proof,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.err()
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.post_info;
|
||||
|
||||
// the fee is not waived and the original weight is kept.
|
||||
assert!(post_info.actual_weight.is_none());
|
||||
assert_eq!(post_info.pays_fee, Pays::Yes);
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user