mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-06-13 21:01:05 +00:00
Split Indices module from Balances (#1404)
* Indices module * Remove indices stuff from balances * Rejob node, move Lookup into system. * Fix up some modules. * Fix democracy tests * Fix staking tests * Fix more tests * Final test fixes * Bump runtime versions * Assets uses compact dispatchers * Contracts module uses indexed addressing * Democracy has more compact encoding * Example now demonstrates compact eencoding * Sudo uses indexed address * Upgrade key also uses indexed lookups * Assets more compact types. * Fix test * Rebuild runtime, whitespace * Remove TOODs * Remove TODOs * Add a couple of tests back to balances. * Update lib.rs * Update lib.rs
This commit is contained in:
@@ -22,67 +22,6 @@ use super::*;
|
||||
use mock::{Balances, ExtBuilder, Runtime, System};
|
||||
use runtime_io::with_externalities;
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn reward_should_work() {
|
||||
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().monied(true).build(), || {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&1), 10);
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::reward(&1, 10));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&1), 20);
|
||||
assert_eq!(<TotalIssuance<Runtime>>::get(), 110);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn indexing_lookup_should_work() {
|
||||
with_externalities(
|
||||
&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
||||
.existential_deposit(10)
|
||||
.monied(true)
|
||||
.build(),
|
||||
|| {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(0), Some(1));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(1), Some(2));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(2), Some(3));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(3), Some(4));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(4), None);
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn default_indexing_on_new_accounts_should_work() {
|
||||
with_externalities(
|
||||
&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
||||
.existential_deposit(10)
|
||||
.monied(true)
|
||||
.build(),
|
||||
|| {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(4), None);
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 5.into(), 10.into()));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(4), Some(5));
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn default_indexing_on_new_accounts_should_work2() {
|
||||
with_externalities(
|
||||
&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
||||
.existential_deposit(10)
|
||||
.creation_fee(50)
|
||||
.monied(true)
|
||||
.build(),
|
||||
|| {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(4), None);
|
||||
// account 1 has 256 * 10 = 2560, account 5 is not exist, ext_deposit is 10, value is 10
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 5.into(), 10.into()));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(4), Some(5));
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&1), 256 * 10 - 10 - 50); // 10 is value, 50 is creation_free
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn default_indexing_on_new_accounts_should_not_work2() {
|
||||
with_externalities(
|
||||
@@ -92,18 +31,64 @@ fn default_indexing_on_new_accounts_should_not_work2() {
|
||||
.monied(true)
|
||||
.build(),
|
||||
|| {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(4), None);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::is_dead_account(&5), true); // account 5 should not exist
|
||||
// account 1 has 256 * 10 = 2560, account 5 is not exist, ext_deposit is 10, value is 9, not satisfies for ext_deposit
|
||||
assert_noop!(
|
||||
Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 5.into(), 9.into()),
|
||||
Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 5, 9.into()),
|
||||
"value too low to create account"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(4), None); // account 5 should not exist
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::is_dead_account(&5), true); // account 5 should not exist
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&1), 256 * 10);
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn reserved_balance_should_prevent_reclaim_count() {
|
||||
with_externalities(
|
||||
&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
||||
.existential_deposit(256 * 1)
|
||||
.monied(true)
|
||||
.build(),
|
||||
|| {
|
||||
System::inc_account_nonce(&2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::is_dead_account(&2), false);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::is_dead_account(&5), true);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 256 * 20);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&2, 256 * 19 + 1)); // account 2 becomes mostly reserved
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&2), 0); // "free" account deleted."
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 256 * 19 + 1); // reserve still exists.
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::is_dead_account(&2), false);
|
||||
assert_eq!(System::account_nonce(&2), 1);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(4).into(), 5, (256 * 1 + 0x69).into())); // account 4 tries to take index 1 for account 5.
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&5), 256 * 1 + 0x69);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::is_dead_account(&5), false);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::slash(&2, 256 * 18 + 2), None); // account 2 gets slashed
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 0); // "reserve" account reduced to 255 (below ED) so account deleted
|
||||
assert_eq!(System::account_nonce(&2), 0); // nonce zero
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::is_dead_account(&2), true);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(4).into(), 6, (256 * 1 + 0x69).into())); // account 4 tries to take index 1 again for account 6.
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&6), 256 * 1 + 0x69);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::is_dead_account(&6), false);
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn reward_should_work() {
|
||||
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().monied(true).build(), || {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&1), 10);
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::reward(&1, 10));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&1), 20);
|
||||
assert_eq!(<TotalIssuance<Runtime>>::get(), 110);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn dust_account_removal_should_work() {
|
||||
with_externalities(
|
||||
@@ -116,7 +101,7 @@ fn dust_account_removal_should_work() {
|
||||
assert_eq!(System::account_nonce(&2), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 256 * 20);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(2).into(), 5.into(), (256 * 10 + 1).into())); // index 1 (account 2) becomes zombie
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(2).into(), 5, (256 * 10 + 1).into())); // index 1 (account 2) becomes zombie
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&5), 256 * 10 + 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(System::account_nonce(&2), 0);
|
||||
@@ -136,7 +121,7 @@ fn dust_account_removal_should_work2() {
|
||||
System::inc_account_nonce(&2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(System::account_nonce(&2), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 256 * 20);
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(2).into(), 5.into(), (256 * 10).into())); // index 1 (account 2) becomes zombie for 256*10 + 50(fee) < 256 * 10 (ext_deposit)
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(2).into(), 5, (256 * 10).into())); // index 1 (account 2) becomes zombie for 256*10 + 50(fee) < 256 * 10 (ext_deposit)
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&5), 256 * 10);
|
||||
assert_eq!(System::account_nonce(&2), 0);
|
||||
@@ -144,118 +129,6 @@ fn dust_account_removal_should_work2() {
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn reclaim_indexing_on_new_accounts_should_work() {
|
||||
with_externalities(
|
||||
&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
||||
.existential_deposit(256 * 1)
|
||||
.monied(true)
|
||||
.build(),
|
||||
|| {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(1), Some(2));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(4), None);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 256 * 20);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(2).into(), 5.into(), (256 * 20).into())); // account 2 becomes zombie freeing index 1 for reclaim)
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(5).into(), 6.into(), (256 * 1 + 0x69).into())); // account 6 takes index 1.
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&6), 256 * 1 + 0x69);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(1), Some(6));
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn reclaim_indexing_on_new_accounts_should_work2() {
|
||||
with_externalities(
|
||||
&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
||||
.existential_deposit(256 * 1)
|
||||
.monied(true)
|
||||
.build(),
|
||||
|| {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(1), Some(2));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(4), None);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 256 * 20);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(2).into(), 5.into(), (256 * 20 - 50).into())); // account 2 becomes zombie freeing index 1 for reclaim) 50 is creation fee
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(5).into(), 6.into(), (256 * 1 + 0x69).into())); // account 6 takes index 1.
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&6), 256 * 1 + 0x69);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(1), Some(6));
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn reserved_balance_should_prevent_reclaim_count() {
|
||||
with_externalities(
|
||||
&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
||||
.existential_deposit(256 * 1)
|
||||
.monied(true)
|
||||
.build(),
|
||||
|| {
|
||||
System::inc_account_nonce(&2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(1), Some(2));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(4), None);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 256 * 20);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&2, 256 * 19 + 1)); // account 2 becomes mostly reserved
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&2), 0); // "free" account deleted."
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 256 * 19 + 1); // reserve still exists.
|
||||
assert_eq!(System::account_nonce(&2), 1);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(4).into(), 5.into(), (256 * 1 + 0x69).into())); // account 4 tries to take index 1 for account 5.
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&5), 256 * 1 + 0x69);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(1), Some(2)); // but fails.
|
||||
assert_eq!(System::account_nonce(&2), 1);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::slash(&2, 256 * 18 + 2), None); // account 2 gets slashed
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 0); // "free" account deleted."
|
||||
assert_eq!(System::account_nonce(&2), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(4).into(), 6.into(), (256 * 1 + 0x69).into())); // account 4 tries to take index 1 again for account 6.
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&6), 256 * 1 + 0x69);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(1), Some(6)); // and succeeds.
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn reserved_balance_should_prevent_reclaim_count2() {
|
||||
with_externalities(
|
||||
&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
||||
.existential_deposit(256 * 1)
|
||||
.monied(true)
|
||||
.build(),
|
||||
|| {
|
||||
System::inc_account_nonce(&2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(1), Some(2));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(4), None);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 256 * 20);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&2, 256 * 19 + 1)); // account 2 becomes mostly reserved
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&2), 0); // "free" account deleted."
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 256 * 19 + 1); // reserve still exists.
|
||||
assert_eq!(System::account_nonce(&2), 1);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(4).into(), 5.into(), (256 * 1 + 0x69).into())); // account 4 tries to take index 1 for account 5.
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&5), 256 * 1 + 0x69);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(1), Some(2)); // but fails.
|
||||
assert_eq!(System::account_nonce(&2), 1);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::slash(&2, 256 * 18 + 2), None); // account 2 gets slashed
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 0); // "free" account deleted."
|
||||
assert_eq!(System::account_nonce(&2), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(4).into(), 6.into(), (256 * 1 + 0x69).into())); // account 4 tries to take index 1 again for account 6.
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&6), 256 * 1 + 0x69);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::lookup_index(1), Some(6)); // and succeeds.
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn balance_works() {
|
||||
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(), || {
|
||||
@@ -274,7 +147,7 @@ fn balance_transfer_works() {
|
||||
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(), || {
|
||||
Balances::set_free_balance(&1, 111);
|
||||
Balances::increase_total_stake_by(111);
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 2.into(), 69.into()));
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 2, 69.into()));
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&1), 42);
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 69);
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -313,7 +186,7 @@ fn balance_transfer_when_reserved_should_not_work() {
|
||||
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(), || {
|
||||
Balances::set_free_balance(&1, 111);
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&1, 69));
|
||||
assert_noop!(Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 2.into(), 69.into()), "balance too low to send value");
|
||||
assert_noop!(Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 2, 69.into()), "balance too low to send value");
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -444,7 +317,7 @@ fn transferring_too_high_value_should_not_panic() {
|
||||
<FreeBalance<Runtime>>::insert(2, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_err!(
|
||||
Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 2.into(), u64::max_value().into()),
|
||||
Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 2, u64::max_value().into()),
|
||||
"destination balance too high to receive value"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -472,7 +345,7 @@ fn account_removal_on_free_too_low() {
|
||||
// Transfer funds from account 1 of such amount that after this transfer
|
||||
// the balance of account 1 will be below the exsistential threshold.
|
||||
// This should lead to the removal of all balance of this account.
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 2.into(), 20.into()));
|
||||
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 2, 20.into()));
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify free balance removal of account 1.
|
||||
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&1), 0);
|
||||
@@ -492,7 +365,7 @@ fn transfer_overflow_isnt_exploitable() {
|
||||
let evil_value = u64::max_value() - 49;
|
||||
|
||||
assert_err!(
|
||||
Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 5.into(), evil_value.into()),
|
||||
Balances::transfer(Some(1).into(), 5, evil_value.into()),
|
||||
"got overflow after adding a fee to value"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user