Improve paras runtime BenchBuilder api (#4318)

* Improve paras runtime `BenchBuilder` api

* fix

* Improve doc comment

* Some doc improvemens'

* Use setters and no params for build

* +nightly-2021-10-29 fmt

* Clean up some comments

* Simplify set_code_upgrade

* Accept a slice for set_dispute_sessions

* Doc comments

* Spelling

* use impl AsRef

* Prepare for merge

* fmt

Co-authored-by: Bernhard Schuster <bernhard@ahoi.io>

polkadot/runtime/parachains/src/builder.rs

@@ -63,13 +63,31 @@ fn byte32_slice_from(n: u32) -> [u8; 32] {
 
 /// Paras inherent `enter` benchmark scenario builder.
 pub(crate) struct BenchBuilder<T: paras_inherent::Config> {
+	/// Active validators. Validators should be declared prior to all other setup.
 	validators: Option<Vec<ValidatorId>>,
+	/// Starting block number; we expect it to get incremented on session setup.
 	block_number: T::BlockNumber,
+	/// Starting session; we expect it to get incremented on session setup.
 	session: SessionIndex,
+	/// Session we want the scenario to take place in. We will roll to this session.
 	target_session: u32,
+	/// Optionally set the max validators per core; otherwise uses the configuration value.
 	max_validators_per_core: Option<u32>,
+	/// Optionally set the max validators; otherwise uses the configuration value.
 	max_validators: Option<u32>,
+	/// Optionally set the number of dispute statements for each candidate.
 	dispute_statements: BTreeMap<u32, u32>,
+	/// Session index of for each dispute. Index of slice corresponds to a core,
+	/// which is offset by the number of entries for `backed_and_concluding_cores`. I.E. if
+	/// `backed_and_concluding_cores` has 3 entries, the first index of `dispute_sessions`
+	/// will correspond to core index 3. There must be one entry for each core with a dispute
+	/// statement set.
+	dispute_sessions: Vec<u32>,
+	/// Map from core seed to number of validity votes.
+	backed_and_concluding_cores: BTreeMap<u32, u32>,
+	/// Make every candidate include a code upgrade by setting this to `Some` where the interior
+	/// value is the byte length of the new code.
+	code_upgrade: Option<u32>,
 	_phantom: sp_std::marker::PhantomData<T>,
 }
 
@@ -86,24 +104,48 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 	/// of the functions in this implementation.
 	pub(crate) fn new() -> Self {
 		BenchBuilder {
-			// Validators should be declared prior to all other setup.
 			validators: None,
-			// Starting block number; we expect it to get incremented on session setup.
 			block_number: Zero::zero(),
-			// Starting session; we expect it to get incremented on session setup.
 			session: SessionIndex::from(0u32),
-			// Session we want the scenario to take place in. We roll to to this session.
 			target_session: 2u32,
-			// Optionally set the max validators per core; otherwise uses the configuration value.
 			max_validators_per_core: None,
-			// Optionally set the max validators; otherwise uses the configuration value.
 			max_validators: None,
-			// Optionally set the number of dispute statements for each candidate,
 			dispute_statements: BTreeMap::new(),
+			dispute_sessions: Default::default(),
+			backed_and_concluding_cores: Default::default(),
+			code_upgrade: None,
 			_phantom: sp_std::marker::PhantomData::<T>,
 		}
 	}
 
+	/// Set the session index for each dispute statement set (in other words, set the session the
+	/// the dispute statement set's relay chain block is from). Indexes of `dispute_sessions`
+	/// correspond to a core, which is offset by the number of entries for
+	/// `backed_and_concluding_cores`. I.E. if `backed_and_concluding_cores` cores has 3 entries,
+	/// the first index of `dispute_sessions` will correspond to core index 3.
+	///
+	/// Note that there must be an entry for each core with a dispute statement set.
+	pub(crate) fn set_dispute_sessions(mut self, dispute_sessions: impl AsRef<[u32]>) -> Self {
+		self.dispute_sessions = dispute_sessions.as_ref().to_vec();
+		self
+	}
+
+	/// Set a map from core/para id seed to number of validity votes.
+	pub(crate) fn set_backed_and_concluding_cores(
+		mut self,
+		backed_and_concluding_cores: BTreeMap<u32, u32>,
+	) -> Self {
+		self.backed_and_concluding_cores = backed_and_concluding_cores;
+		self
+	}
+
+	/// Set to include a code upgrade for all backed candidates. The value will be the byte length
+	/// of the code.
+	pub(crate) fn set_code_upgrade(mut self, code_upgrade: impl Into<Option<u32>>) -> Self {
+		self.code_upgrade = code_upgrade.into();
+		self
+	}
+
 	/// Mock header.
 	pub(crate) fn header(block_number: T::BlockNumber) -> T::Header {
 		T::Header::new(
@@ -133,6 +175,7 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 		self.max_validators.unwrap_or(Self::fallback_max_validators())
 	}
 
+	/// Set the maximum number of active validators.
 	#[cfg(not(feature = "runtime-benchmarks"))]
 	pub(crate) fn set_max_validators(mut self, n: u32) -> Self {
 		self.max_validators = Some(n);
@@ -145,16 +188,18 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 		configuration::Pallet::<T>::config().max_validators_per_core.unwrap_or(5)
 	}
 
-	/// Specify a mapping of core index, para id, group index seed to the number of dispute statements for the
+	/// Specify a mapping of core index/ para id to the number of dispute statements for the
-	/// corresponding dispute statement set. Note that if the number of disputes is not specified it fallbacks
+	/// corresponding dispute statement set. Note that if the number of disputes is not specified
-	/// to having a dispute per every validator. Additionally, an entry is not guaranteed to have a dispute - it
+	/// it fallbacks to having a dispute per every validator. Additionally, an entry is not
-	/// must line up with the cores marked as disputed as defined in `Self::Build`.
+	/// guaranteed to have a dispute - it must line up with the cores marked as disputed as defined
+	/// in `Self::Build`.
 	#[cfg(not(feature = "runtime-benchmarks"))]
 	pub(crate) fn set_dispute_statements(mut self, m: BTreeMap<u32, u32>) -> Self {
 		self.dispute_statements = m;
 		self
 	}
 
+	/// Get the maximum number of validators per core.
 	fn max_validators_per_core(&self) -> u32 {
 		self.max_validators_per_core.unwrap_or(Self::fallback_max_validators_per_core())
 	}
@@ -166,17 +211,18 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 		self
 	}
 
-	/// Maximum number of cores we expect from this configuration.
+	/// Get the maximum number of cores we expect from this configuration.
 	pub(crate) fn max_cores(&self) -> u32 {
 		self.max_validators() / self.max_validators_per_core()
 	}
 
-	/// Minimum number of validity votes in order for a backed candidate to be included.
+	/// Get the minimum number of validity votes in order for a backed candidate to be included.
 	#[cfg(feature = "runtime-benchmarks")]
 	pub(crate) fn fallback_min_validity_votes() -> u32 {
 		(Self::fallback_max_validators() / 2) + 1
 	}
 
+	/// Create para id, core index, and grab the associated group index from the scheduler pallet.
 	fn create_indexes(&self, seed: u32) -> (ParaId, CoreIndex, GroupIndex) {
 		let para_id = ParaId::from(seed);
 		let core_idx = CoreIndex(seed);
@@ -186,6 +232,7 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 		(para_id, core_idx, group_idx)
 	}
 
+	/// Create a mock of `CandidatePendingAvailability`.
 	fn candidate_availability_mock(
 		group_idx: GroupIndex,
 		core_idx: CoreIndex,
@@ -204,6 +251,11 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 		)
 	}
 
+	/// Add `CandidatePendingAvailability` and `CandidateCommitments` to the relevant storage items.
+	///
+	/// NOTE: the default `CandidateCommitments` used does not include any data that would lead to
+	/// heavy code paths in `enact_candidate`. But enact_candidates does return a weight which will
+	/// get taken into account.
 	fn add_availability(
 		para_id: ParaId,
 		core_idx: CoreIndex,
@@ -217,14 +269,13 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 			candidate_hash,
 			availability_votes,
 		);
-		// NOTE: commitments does not include any data that would lead to heavy code
-		// paths in `enact_candidate`. But enact_candidates does return a weight which will get
-		// taken into account.
 		let commitments = CandidateCommitments::<u32>::default();
 		inclusion::PendingAvailability::<T>::insert(para_id, candidate_availability);
 		inclusion::PendingAvailabilityCommitments::<T>::insert(&para_id, commitments);
 	}
 
+	/// Create an `AvailabilityBitfield` where `concluding` is a map where each key is a core index
+	/// that is concluding and `cores` is the total number of cores in the system.
 	fn availability_bitvec(concluding: &BTreeMap<u32, u32>, cores: u32) -> AvailabilityBitfield {
 		let mut bitfields = bitvec::bitvec![bitvec::order::Lsb0, u8; 0; 0];
 		for i in 0..cores {
@@ -238,6 +289,8 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 		bitfields.into()
 	}
 
+	/// Run to block number `to`, calling `initializer` `on_initialize` and `on_finalize` along the
+	/// way.
 	fn run_to_block(to: u32) {
 		let to = to.into();
 		while frame_system::Pallet::<T>::block_number() < to {
@@ -250,6 +303,10 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 		}
 	}
 
+	/// Register `cores` count of parachains.
+	///
+	/// Note that this must be called at least 2 sessions before the target session as there is a
+	/// n+2 session delay for the scheduled actions to take effect.
 	fn setup_para_ids(cores: u32) {
 		// make sure parachains exist prior to session change.
 		for i in 0..cores {
@@ -288,6 +345,7 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 		}
 	}
 
+	/// Create a bitvec of `validators` length with all yes votes.
 	fn validator_availability_votes_yes(validators: usize) -> BitVec<bitvec::order::Lsb0, u8> {
 		// every validator confirms availability.
 		bitvec::bitvec![bitvec::order::Lsb0, u8; 1; validators as usize]
@@ -338,6 +396,10 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 		self
 	}
 
+	/// Create a `UncheckedSigned<AvailabilityBitfield> for each validator where each core in
+	/// `concluding_cores` is fully available. Additionally set up storage such that each
+	/// `concluding_cores`is pending becoming fully available so the generated bitfields will be
+	///  to the cores successfully being freed from the candidates being marked as available.
 	fn create_availability_bitfields(
 		&self,
 		concluding_cores: &BTreeMap<u32, u32>,
@@ -364,8 +426,7 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 			.collect();
 
 		for (seed, _) in concluding_cores.iter() {
-			// make sure the candidates that are concluding by becoming available are marked as
+			// make sure the candidates that will be concluding are marked as pending availability.
-			// pending availability.
 			let (para_id, core_idx, group_idx) = self.create_indexes(seed.clone());
 			Self::add_availability(
 				para_id,
@@ -483,19 +544,25 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 			.collect()
 	}
 
+	/// Fill cores `start..last` with dispute statement sets. The statement sets will have 3/4th of
+	/// votes be valid, and 1/4th of votes be invalid.
 	fn create_disputes_with_no_spam(
 		&self,
 		start: u32,
 		last: u32,
-		dispute_sessions: &[u32],
+		dispute_sessions: impl AsRef<[u32]>,
 	) -> Vec<DisputeStatementSet> {
 		let validators =
 			self.validators.as_ref().expect("must have some validators prior to calling");
 
+		let dispute_sessions = dispute_sessions.as_ref();
 		(start..last)
 			.map(|seed| {
-				let session =
+				let dispute_session_idx = (seed - start) as usize;
-					dispute_sessions.get(seed as usize).cloned().unwrap_or(self.target_session);
+				let session = dispute_sessions
+					.get(dispute_session_idx)
+					.cloned()
+					.unwrap_or(self.target_session);
 
 				let (para_id, core_idx, group_idx) = self.create_indexes(seed);
 				let candidate_hash = CandidateHash(H256::from(byte32_slice_from(seed)));
@@ -537,19 +604,11 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 
 	/// Build a scenario for testing or benchmarks.
 	///
-	/// - `backed_and_concluding_cores`: Map from core/para id/group index seed to number of
+	/// Note that this API only allows building scenarios where the `backed_and_concluding_cores`
-	/// validity votes.
+	/// are mutually exclusive with the cores for disputes. So
-	/// - `dispute_sessions`: Session index of for each dispute. Index of slice corresponds to core.
+	/// `backed_and_concluding_cores.len() + dispute_sessions.len()` must be less than the max
-	/// The length of this must equal total cores used. Seed index for disputes starts at
+	/// number of cores.
-	/// `backed_and_concluding_cores.len()`, so `dispute_sessions` needs to be left padded by
+	pub(crate) fn build(self) -> Bench<T> {
-	/// `backed_and_concluding_cores.len()` values which effectively get ignored.
-	/// TODO we should fix this.
-	pub(crate) fn build(
-		self,
-		backed_and_concluding_cores: BTreeMap<u32, u32>,
-		dispute_sessions: &[u32],
-		includes_code_upgrade: Option<u32>,
-	) -> Bench<T> {
 		// Make sure relevant storage is cleared. This is just to get the asserts to work when
 		// running tests because it seems the storage is not cleared in between.
 		inclusion::PendingAvailabilityCommitments::<T>::remove_all(None);
@@ -557,11 +616,12 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 
 		// We don't allow a core to have both disputes and be marked fully available at this block.
 		let cores = self.max_cores();
-		let used_cores = dispute_sessions.len() as u32;
+		let used_cores =
+			(self.dispute_sessions.len() + self.backed_and_concluding_cores.len()) as u32;
 		assert!(used_cores <= cores);
 
-		// NOTE: there is an n+2 session delay for these actions to take effect
+		// NOTE: there is an n+2 session delay for these actions to take effect.
-		// We are currently in Session 0, so these changes will take effect in Session 2
+		// We are currently in Session 0, so these changes will take effect in Session 2.
 		Self::setup_para_ids(used_cores);
 
 		let validator_ids = Self::generate_validator_pairs(self.max_validators());
@@ -569,14 +629,14 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 		let builder = self.setup_session(target_session, validator_ids, used_cores);
 
 		let bitfields =
-			builder.create_availability_bitfields(&backed_and_concluding_cores, used_cores);
+			builder.create_availability_bitfields(&builder.backed_and_concluding_cores, used_cores);
-		let backed_candidates =
+		let backed_candidates = builder
-			builder.create_backed_candidates(&backed_and_concluding_cores, includes_code_upgrade);
+			.create_backed_candidates(&builder.backed_and_concluding_cores, builder.code_upgrade);
 
 		let disputes = builder.create_disputes_with_no_spam(
-			backed_and_concluding_cores.len() as u32,
+			builder.backed_and_concluding_cores.len() as u32,
 			used_cores,
-			dispute_sessions,
+			builder.dispute_sessions.as_slice(),
 		);
 
 		assert_eq!(
@@ -585,7 +645,7 @@ impl<T: paras_inherent::Config> BenchBuilder<T> {
 		);
 		assert_eq!(inclusion::PendingAvailability::<T>::iter().count(), used_cores as usize,);
 
-		// Mark all the use cores as occupied. We expect that their are `backed_and_concluding_cores`
+		// Mark all the used cores as occupied. We expect that their are `backed_and_concluding_cores`
 		// that are pending availability and that there are `used_cores - backed_and_concluding_cores `
 		// which are about to be disputed.
 		scheduler::AvailabilityCores::<T>::set(vec![

polkadot/runtime/parachains/src/paras_inherent/benchmarking.rs

@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ benchmarks! {
 		let v in 10..BenchBuilder::<T>::fallback_max_validators();
 
 		let scenario = BenchBuilder::<T>::new()
-			.build(Default::default(), &[2], None);
+			.set_dispute_sessions(&[2])
+			.build();
 
 		let mut benchmark = scenario.data.clone();
 		let dispute = benchmark.disputes.pop().unwrap();
@@ -60,7 +61,8 @@ benchmarks! {
 				.collect();
 
 		let scenario = BenchBuilder::<T>::new()
-			.build(cores_with_backed, &[1], None);
+			.set_backed_and_concluding_cores(cores_with_backed)
+			.build();
 
 		let mut benchmark = scenario.data.clone();
 		let bitfield = benchmark.bitfields.pop().unwrap();
@@ -104,7 +106,8 @@ benchmarks! {
 				.collect();
 
 		let scenario = BenchBuilder::<T>::new()
-			.build(cores_with_backed.clone(), &[1], None);
+			.set_backed_and_concluding_cores(cores_with_backed.clone())
+			.build();
 
 		let mut benchmark = scenario.data.clone();
 
@@ -156,7 +159,9 @@ benchmarks! {
 				.collect();
 
 		let scenario = BenchBuilder::<T>::new()
-			.build(cores_with_backed.clone(), &[1], Some(v));
+			.set_backed_and_concluding_cores(cores_with_backed.clone())
+			.set_code_upgrade(v)
+			.build();
 
 		let mut benchmark = scenario.data.clone();
 

polkadot/runtime/parachains/src/paras_inherent/tests.rs

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ mod enter {
 		dispute_sessions: Vec<u32>,
 		backed_and_concluding: BTreeMap<u32, u32>,
 		num_validators_per_core: u32,
-		includes_code_upgrade: Option<u32>,
+		code_upgrade: Option<u32>,
 	}
 
 	fn make_inherent_data(
@@ -43,14 +43,24 @@ mod enter {
 			dispute_sessions,
 			backed_and_concluding,
 			num_validators_per_core,
-			includes_code_upgrade,
+			code_upgrade,
 		}: TestConfig,
 	) -> Bench<Test> {
-		BenchBuilder::<Test>::new()
+		let builder = BenchBuilder::<Test>::new()
-			.set_max_validators((dispute_sessions.len() as u32) * num_validators_per_core)
+			.set_max_validators(
+				(dispute_sessions.len() + backed_and_concluding.len()) as u32 *
+					num_validators_per_core,
+			)
 			.set_max_validators_per_core(num_validators_per_core)
 			.set_dispute_statements(dispute_statements)
-			.build(backed_and_concluding, dispute_sessions.as_slice(), includes_code_upgrade)
+			.set_backed_and_concluding_cores(backed_and_concluding)
+			.set_dispute_sessions(&dispute_sessions[..]);
+
+		if let Some(code_size) = code_upgrade {
+			builder.set_code_upgrade(code_size).build()
+		} else {
+			builder.build()
+		}
 	}
 
 	#[test]
@@ -67,10 +77,10 @@ mod enter {
 
 			let scenario = make_inherent_data(TestConfig {
 				dispute_statements,
-				dispute_sessions: vec![0, 0],
+				dispute_sessions: vec![], // No disputes
 				backed_and_concluding,
 				num_validators_per_core: 1,
-				includes_code_upgrade: None,
+				code_upgrade: None,
 			});
 
 			// We expect the scenario to have cores 0 & 1 with pending availability. The backed
@@ -133,7 +143,7 @@ mod enter {
 				dispute_sessions: vec![1, 2, 3 /* Session 3 too new, will get filtered out */],
 				backed_and_concluding,
 				num_validators_per_core: 5,
-				includes_code_upgrade: None,
+				code_upgrade: None,
 			});
 
 			let expected_para_inherent_data = scenario.data.clone();
@@ -193,15 +203,15 @@ mod enter {
 		new_test_ext(MockGenesisConfig::default()).execute_with(|| {
 			// Create the inherent data for this block
 			let dispute_statements = BTreeMap::new();
-			// No backed and concluding cores, so all cores will be fileld with disputesw
+			// No backed and concluding cores, so all cores will be filld with disputes.
 			let backed_and_concluding = BTreeMap::new();
 
 			let scenario = make_inherent_data(TestConfig {
 				dispute_statements,
-				dispute_sessions: vec![2, 2, 1], // 3 cores, all disputes
+				dispute_sessions: vec![2, 2, 1], // 3 cores with disputes
 				backed_and_concluding,
 				num_validators_per_core: 6,
-				includes_code_upgrade: None,
+				code_upgrade: None,
 			});
 
 			let expected_para_inherent_data = scenario.data.clone();
@@ -257,15 +267,15 @@ mod enter {
 		new_test_ext(MockGenesisConfig::default()).execute_with(|| {
 			// Create the inherent data for this block
 			let dispute_statements = BTreeMap::new();
-			// No backed and concluding cores, so all cores will be fileld with disputesw
+			// No backed and concluding cores, so all cores will be filled with disputes.
 			let backed_and_concluding = BTreeMap::new();
 
 			let scenario = make_inherent_data(TestConfig {
 				dispute_statements,
-				dispute_sessions: vec![2, 2, 1], // 3 cores, all disputes
+				dispute_sessions: vec![2, 2, 1], // 3 cores with disputes
 				backed_and_concluding,
 				num_validators_per_core: 6,
-				includes_code_upgrade: None,
+				code_upgrade: None,
 			});
 
 			let expected_para_inherent_data = scenario.data.clone();
@@ -308,11 +318,10 @@ mod enter {
 
 			let scenario = make_inherent_data(TestConfig {
 				dispute_statements,
-				// 2 backed candidates + 3 disputes (at sessions 2, 1 and 1)
+				dispute_sessions: vec![2, 2, 1], // 3 cores with disputes
-				dispute_sessions: vec![0, 0, 2, 2, 1],
 				backed_and_concluding,
 				num_validators_per_core: 4,
-				includes_code_upgrade: None,
+				code_upgrade: None,
 			});
 
 			let expected_para_inherent_data = scenario.data.clone();
@@ -384,11 +393,10 @@ mod enter {
 
 			let scenario = make_inherent_data(TestConfig {
 				dispute_statements,
-				// 2 backed candidates + 3 disputes (at sessions 2, 1 and 1)
+				dispute_sessions: vec![2, 2, 1], // 3 cores with disputes
-				dispute_sessions: vec![0, 0, 2, 2, 1],
 				backed_and_concluding,
 				num_validators_per_core: 4,
-				includes_code_upgrade: None,
+				code_upgrade: None,
 			});
 
 			let expected_para_inherent_data = scenario.data.clone();
@@ -443,11 +451,10 @@ mod enter {
 
 			let scenario = make_inherent_data(TestConfig {
 				dispute_statements,
-				// 2 backed candidates + 3 disputes (at sessions 2, 1 and 1)
+				dispute_sessions: vec![2, 2, 1], // 3 cores with disputes
-				dispute_sessions: vec![0, 0, 2, 2, 1],
 				backed_and_concluding,
 				num_validators_per_core: 5,
-				includes_code_upgrade: None,
+				code_upgrade: None,
 			});
 
 			let expected_para_inherent_data = scenario.data.clone();
@@ -521,11 +528,10 @@ mod enter {
 
 			let scenario = make_inherent_data(TestConfig {
 				dispute_statements,
-				// 2 backed candidates + 3 disputes (at sessions 2, 1 and 1)
+				dispute_sessions: vec![2, 2, 1], // 3 cores with disputes
-				dispute_sessions: vec![0, 0, 2, 2, 1],
 				backed_and_concluding,
 				num_validators_per_core: 5,
-				includes_code_upgrade: None,
+				code_upgrade: None,
 			});
 
 			let expected_para_inherent_data = scenario.data.clone();
@@ -578,10 +584,10 @@ mod enter {
 
 			let scenario = make_inherent_data(TestConfig {
 				dispute_statements,
-				dispute_sessions: vec![0, 0, 2, 2, 1], // 2 backed candidates, 3 disputes at sessions 2, 1 and 1 respectively
+				dispute_sessions: vec![2, 2, 1], // 3 cores with disputes
 				backed_and_concluding,
 				num_validators_per_core: 5,
-				includes_code_upgrade: None,
+				code_upgrade: None,
 			});
 
 			let expected_para_inherent_data = scenario.data.clone();
@@ -646,10 +652,10 @@ mod enter {
 
 			let scenario = make_inherent_data(TestConfig {
 				dispute_statements,
-				dispute_sessions: vec![0, 0, 2, 2, 1], // 2 backed candidates, 3 disputes at sessions 2, 1 and 1 respectively
+				dispute_sessions: vec![2, 2, 1], // 3 cores with disputes
 				backed_and_concluding,
 				num_validators_per_core: 5,
-				includes_code_upgrade: None,
+				code_upgrade: None,
 			});
 
 			let expected_para_inherent_data = scenario.data.clone();