Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2319
Changes:
- Ensure that only `enqueue_message(s)` is callable from within the
message processor. This prevents messed up storage that can currently
happen when the pallet is called into recursively.
- Use `H256` instead of `[u8; 32]` for clearer API.
## Details
The re-entracy check is done with the `environmental` crate by adding a
`with_service_mutex(f)` function that runs the closure exclusively. This
works since the MQ pallet is not instantiable.
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
# Description
- What does this PR do? Allows to generate JSON schema for subset of XCM
in std builds
- Why are these changes needed? To support XCM messages in CosmWasm
contracts which require Schemars to generate contract clients
- How were these changes implemented and what do they affect? We will
use schema feature flag to build XCM pallet with JSON schema enabled
# Checklist
- [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the
"Description" section above
- [x] My PR follows the [labeling requirements](CONTRIBUTING.md#Process)
of this project (at minimum one label for `T`
required)
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if
applicable)
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works (if applicable)
- [x] If this PR alters any external APIs or interfaces used by
Polkadot, the corresponding Polkadot PR is ready as well
as the corresponding Cumulus PR (optional)
As suggested in this thread:
https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/87#discussion_r1400237122
We already have the `IsChildSystemParachain`, which may be used at relay
chain, but it can't be used at a parachain level. So let's use
`AllSiblingSystemParachains` for that. I was thinking about
`AllSystemParachains`, but it may cause wrong impression that it can be
used at a relay chain level.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
# Motivation (+testing)
### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm`
We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
needing to teleport some non-fee asset?
This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
user.
This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
(the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
between said parachain and AssetHub).
Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.
# Description
Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
transfers for all `assets` including fees.
Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
`assets` including fees.
For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.
`assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
be teleportable to `dest`.
No limitations imposed on `fees`.
- for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
`beneficiary`.
- for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
## Review notes
Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Bumps [proc-macro-crate](https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate) from
1.3.1 to 2.0.0.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/releases">proc-macro-crate's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v2.0.0</h2>
<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Release 2.0.0 by <a
href="https://github.com/bkchr"><code>@bkchr</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/pull/39">bkchr/proc-macro-crate#39</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a
href="https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/compare/v1.3.1...v2.0.0">https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/compare/v1.3.1...v2.0.0</a></p>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/commit/cc100ed2bc1ac9bb81812fd435a43e2ef023f355"><code>cc100ed</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/issues/39">#39</a>
from bkchr/bkchr-2.0.0</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/commit/39a7c1844fc4d73ef397a7e8d9419f1f3381aa44"><code>39a7c18</code></a>
Release 2.0.0</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/compare/v1.3.1...v2.0.0">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name> major version` will close this
group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific
dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific
dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name> minor version` will close this
group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific
dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific
dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name>` will close this group update PR
and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency
(unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot unignore <dependency name>` will remove all of the ignore
conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot unignore <dependency name> <ignore condition>` will
remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore
conditions
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and
adds CI to keep them tidy.
If people want we can customise the format rules as described here
https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html
@ggwpez, I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are
propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and
conflicts.
TODO
- [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet
tests instead of deleting the dir
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
In gossip-support, we shuffled the list of authorities using the
`rand::seq::SliceRandom::shuffle`. This function's behavior is
unspecified beyond being `O(n)` and could change in the future, leading
to network issues between nodes using different shuffling algorithms. In
practice, the implementation was a Fisher-Yates shuffle. This PR
replaces the call with a re-implementation of Fisher-Yates and adds a
test to ensure the behavior is the same between the two at the moment.
Follow up to fix a bug from #1814 discovered in XCM emulator testing.
I mistakenly thought that checking out an asset would withdraw it from
the sender. This actually withdraws the asset before checking out.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Good day,
This PR requests the inclusion of two bootnode entries for Polkadot,
Kusama and Westend as part of LuckyFriday's IBP application. The nodes
are hosted on self-owned hardware in a co-located facility. We've
undertaken connectivity tests ourselves and also from members of the
IBP.
The test commands used are as follows:
```
polkadot --chain westend --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-westend.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30334/wss/p2p/12D3KooWDg1YEytdwFFNWroFj6gio4YFsMB3miSbHKgdpJteUMB9" --no-hardware-benchmarks
polkadot --chain westend --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-westend.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooWDg1YEytdwFFNWroFj6gio4YFsMB3miSbHKgdpJteUMB9" --no-hardware-benchmarks
polkadot --chain kusama --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-kusama.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30334/wss/p2p/12D3KooW9vu1GWHBuxyhm7rZgD3fhGZpNajPXFexadvhujWMgwfT" --no-hardware-benchmarks
polkadot --chain kusama --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-kusama.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooW9vu1GWHBuxyhm7rZgD3fhGZpNajPXFexadvhujWMgwfT" --no-hardware-benchmarks
polkadot --chain polkadot --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-polkadot.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30334/wss/p2p/12D3KooWEjk6QXrZJ26fLpaajisJGHiz6WiQsR8k7mkM9GmWKnRZ" --no-hardware-benchmarks
polkadot --chain polkadot --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-polkadot.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooWEjk6QXrZJ26fLpaajisJGHiz6WiQsR8k7mkM9GmWKnRZ" --no-hardware-benchmarks
```
All tests yielded syncing with 1 peer, a positive result. We have also
backed up our node-key in the event that restoration is required.
I hope that the aforementioned meets the requirement for inclusion and
look forward to a speedy turnaround.
Kind Regards,
Will | Paradox
This commit introduces a new concept called `NotificationService` which
allows Polkadot protocols to communicate with the underlying
notification protocol implementation directly, without routing events
through `NetworkWorker`. This implies that each protocol has its own
service which it uses to communicate with remote peers and that each
`NotificationService` is unique with respect to the underlying
notification protocol, meaning `NotificationService` for the transaction
protocol can only be used to send and receive transaction-related
notifications.
The `NotificationService` concept introduces two additional benefits:
* allow protocols to start using custom handshakes
* allow protocols to accept/reject inbound peers
Previously the validation of inbound connections was solely the
responsibility of `ProtocolController`. This caused issues with light
peers and `SyncingEngine` as `ProtocolController` would accept more
peers than `SyncingEngine` could accept which caused peers to have
differing views of their own states. `SyncingEngine` would reject excess
peers but these rejections were not properly communicated to those peers
causing them to assume that they were accepted.
With `NotificationService`, the local handshake is not sent to remote
peer if peer is rejected which allows it to detect that it was rejected.
This commit also deprecates the use of `NetworkEventStream` for all
notification-related events and going forward only DHT events are
provided through `NetworkEventStream`. If protocols wish to follow each
other's events, they must introduce additional abtractions, as is done
for GRANDPA and transactions protocols by following the syncing protocol
through `SyncEventStream`.
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/512
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/514
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/515
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/554
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/556
---
These changes are transferred from
https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14197 but there are no
functional changes compared to that PR
---------
Co-authored-by: Dmitry Markin <dmitry@markin.tech>
Co-authored-by: Alexandru Vasile <60601340+lexnv@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently the polkadot node will backoff from block authoring if
finality starts lagging. This PR disables this mechanism on production
networks (polkadot and kusama) and adds a flags to optionally force
enabling it.
We're going to bridge Polkadot Bridge Hub with [Polkadot Bulletin
chain](https://github.com/zdave-parity/polkadot-bulletin-chain) soon
(and Rococo Bridge Hub with 1:1 copy of Polkadot Bulletin chain even
sooner), so we need a variant for that chain in `NetworkId`. As
suggested, I'm adding a new variant for it to the `NetworkId` (we may
have used `ByGenesis(_)`, but decision was made to have a dedicated
variant for that).
Addresses #409.
This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability
for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission
claiming:
> Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for
claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless?
This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends
`do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the
`Commission` struct, configured by an enum:
```
enum CommissionClaimPermission {
Permissionless,
Account(AccountId),
}
```
This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's
`commission.claim_permission` field:
```
struct BondedPool {
commission: {
<snip>
claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>,
},
<snip>
}
```
This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing
pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root`
role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is
the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None`
again.
#### Changes
- [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field.
- [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`.
- [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call.
- [x] Test to cover new configs and call.
- [x] Add and amend benchmarks.
- [x] Generate new weights + slot into call
`set_commission_claim_permission`.
- [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump
storage version.
- [x] Update Westend weights.
- [x] Migration working.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Our executor currently only supports the WASM MVP feature set, however
nowadays when compiling WASM the Rust compiler has more features enabled
by default.
We do set the `-C target-cpu=mvp` flag to make sure that *our* code gets
compiled in a way that is compatible with our executor, however this
doesn't affect Rust's standard library crates (`std`, `core` and
`alloc`) which are by default precompiled and still can make use of
these extra features.
So in this PR we force the compiler to also compile the standard library
crates for us to make sure that they also only use the MVP features.
I've added the `WASM_BUILD_STD` environment variable which can be used
to disable this behavior if set to `0`.
Unfortunately this *will* slow down the compile times when building
runtimes, but there isn't much that we can do about that.
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1755
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
**Overview:**
Adding an extra malus variant focusing on disputing finalized blocks. It
will:
- wrap around approval-voting
- listen to `OverseerSignal::BlockFinalized` and when encountered start
a dispute for the `dispute_offset`th ancestor
- simply pass through all other messages and signals
Add zombienet tests testing various edgecases:
- disputing freshly finalized blocks
- disputing stale finalized blocks
- disputing eagerly pruned finalized blocks (might be separate PR)
**TODO:**
- [x] Register new malus variant
- [x] Simple pass through wrapper (approval-voting)
- [x] Simple network definition
- [x] Listen to block finalizations
- [x] Fetch ancestor hash
- [x] Fetch session index
- [x] Fetch candidate
- [x] Construct and send dispute message
- [x] zndsl test 1 checking that disputes on fresh finalizations resolve
valid Closes#1365
- [x] zndsl test 2 checking that disputes for too old finalized blocks
are not possible Closes#1364
- [ ] zndsl test 3 checking that disputes for candidates with eagerly
pruned relay parent state are handled correctly #1359 (deferred to a
separate PR)
- [x] Unit tests for new malus variant (testing cli etc)
- [x] Clean/streamline error handling
- [ ] ~~Ensure it tests properly on session boundaries~~
---------
Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <javier@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <marcin@realemail.net>
Co-authored-by: Tsvetomir Dimitrov <tsvetomir@parity.io>
## Overview
This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent
changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142)
made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes.
It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`.
## Details
During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the
`spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on
version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`.
With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number
(still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as
`01_02_003`.
This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the
fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
On extrinsics/call, ensure local XCM execution is complete/successful.
Otherwise, fail the extrinsic so that state changes don't get committed
to the db.
Added regression tests that fail without the fix.
fixes#2237
---------
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
This moves the macro related re-exports to `__private` to make it more
obvious for downstream users that they are using an internal api.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Deprecates `RewardDestination::Controller` variant.
- [x] `RewardDestination::Controller` annotated with `#[deprecated]`.
- [x] `Controller` variant is now handled the same way as `Stash` in
`payout_stakers`.
- [x] `set_payee` errors if `RewardDestination::Controller` is provided.
- [x] Added `update_payee` call to lazily migrate
`RewardDestination::Controller` `Payee` storage entries to
`RewardDestination::Account(controller)` .
- [x] `payout_stakers_dead_controller` has been removed from benches &
weights - was not used.
- [x] Tests no longer use `RewardDestination::Controller`.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <g6pestana@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <52418509+georgepisaltu@users.noreply.github.com>
Adding on top of the new builder pattern for creating XCM programs, I'm
adding some more APIs:
```rust
let paying_fees: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder() // Only allow paying for fees
.withdraw_asset() // First instruction has to load the holding register
.buy_execution() // Second instruction has to be `buy_execution`
.build();
let paying_fees_invalid: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder()
.withdraw_asset()
.build(); // Invalid, need to pay for fees
let not_paying_fees: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder_unpaid()
.unpaid_execution() // Needed
.withdraw_asset()
.deposit_asset()
.build();
let all_goes: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder_unsafe() // You can do anything
.withdraw_asset()
.deposit_asset()
.build();
```
The invalid bits are because the methods don't even exist on the types
that you'd want to call them on.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Hey guys, as discussed I've changed the name to a more general one
`PvfExecKind`, is this good or too general?
Creating this as a draft, I still have to fix the tests.
Closes#1585
Kusama address: FkB6QEo8VnV3oifugNj5NeVG3Mvq1zFbrUu4P5YwRoe5mQN
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Marcin S <marcin@realemail.net>
Oliver Tale-Yazdi