Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2319
Changes:
- Ensure that only `enqueue_message(s)` is callable from within the
message processor. This prevents messed up storage that can currently
happen when the pallet is called into recursively.
- Use `H256` instead of `[u8; 32]` for clearer API.
## Details
The re-entracy check is done with the `environmental` crate by adding a
`with_service_mutex(f)` function that runs the closure exclusively. This
works since the MQ pallet is not instantiable.
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
As suggested in this thread:
https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/87#discussion_r1400237122
We already have the `IsChildSystemParachain`, which may be used at relay
chain, but it can't be used at a parachain level. So let's use
`AllSiblingSystemParachains` for that. I was thinking about
`AllSystemParachains`, but it may cause wrong impression that it can be
used at a relay chain level.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
# Motivation (+testing)
### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm`
We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
needing to teleport some non-fee asset?
This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
user.
This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
(the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
between said parachain and AssetHub).
Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.
# Description
Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
transfers for all `assets` including fees.
Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
`assets` including fees.
For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.
`assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
be teleportable to `dest`.
No limitations imposed on `fees`.
- for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
`beneficiary`.
- for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
## Review notes
Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and
adds CI to keep them tidy.
If people want we can customise the format rules as described here
https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html
@ggwpez, I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are
propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and
conflicts.
TODO
- [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet
tests instead of deleting the dir
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Follow up to fix a bug from #1814 discovered in XCM emulator testing.
I mistakenly thought that checking out an asset would withdraw it from
the sender. This actually withdraws the asset before checking out.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Addresses #409.
This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability
for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission
claiming:
> Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for
claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless?
This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends
`do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the
`Commission` struct, configured by an enum:
```
enum CommissionClaimPermission {
Permissionless,
Account(AccountId),
}
```
This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's
`commission.claim_permission` field:
```
struct BondedPool {
commission: {
<snip>
claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>,
},
<snip>
}
```
This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing
pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root`
role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is
the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None`
again.
#### Changes
- [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field.
- [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`.
- [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call.
- [x] Test to cover new configs and call.
- [x] Add and amend benchmarks.
- [x] Generate new weights + slot into call
`set_commission_claim_permission`.
- [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump
storage version.
- [x] Update Westend weights.
- [x] Migration working.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
## Overview
This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent
changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142)
made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes.
It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`.
## Details
During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the
`spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on
version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`.
With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number
(still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as
`01_02_003`.
This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the
fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Deprecates `RewardDestination::Controller` variant.
- [x] `RewardDestination::Controller` annotated with `#[deprecated]`.
- [x] `Controller` variant is now handled the same way as `Stash` in
`payout_stakers`.
- [x] `set_payee` errors if `RewardDestination::Controller` is provided.
- [x] Added `update_payee` call to lazily migrate
`RewardDestination::Controller` `Payee` storage entries to
`RewardDestination::Account(controller)` .
- [x] `payout_stakers_dead_controller` has been removed from benches &
weights - was not used.
- [x] Tests no longer use `RewardDestination::Controller`.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <g6pestana@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <52418509+georgepisaltu@users.noreply.github.com>
Hey guys, as discussed I've changed the name to a more general one
`PvfExecKind`, is this good or too general?
Creating this as a draft, I still have to fix the tests.
Closes#1585
Kusama address: FkB6QEo8VnV3oifugNj5NeVG3Mvq1zFbrUu4P5YwRoe5mQN
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Marcin S <marcin@realemail.net>
Westend now successfully updated to `spec: 103000`, we **have to
remove** the session keys migration before the next release as it
doesn't gracefully handle reapplying it.
The goal of this PR is to migrate Identity deposits from the Relay Chain
to a system parachain.
The problem I want to solve is that `IdentityOf` and `SubsOf` both store
an amount that's held in reserve as a storage deposit. When migrating to
a parachain, we can take a snapshot of the actual `IdentityInfo` and
sub-account mappings, but should migrate (off chain) the `deposit`s to
zero, since the chain (and by extension, accounts) won't have any funds
at genesis.
The good news is that we expect parachain deposits to be significantly
lower (possibly 100x) on the parachain. That is, a deposit of 21 DOT on
the Relay Chain would need 0.21 DOT on a parachain. This PR proposes to
migrate the deposits in the following way:
1. Introduces a new pallet with two extrinsics:
- `reap_identity`: Has a configurable `ReapOrigin`, which would be set
to `EnsureSigned` on the Relay Chain (i.e. callable by anyone) and
`EnsureRoot` on the parachain (we don't want identities reaped from
there).
- `poke_deposit`: Checks what deposit the pallet holds (at genesis,
zero) and attempts to update the amount based on the calculated deposit
for storage data.
2. `reap_identity` clears all storage data for a `target` account and
unreserves their deposit.
3. A `ReapIdentityHandler` teleports the necessary DOT to the parachain
and calls `poke_deposit`. Since the parachain deposit is much lower, and
was just unreserved, we know we have enough.
One awkwardness I ran into was that the XCMv3 instruction set does not
provide a way for the system to teleport assets without a fee being
deducted on reception. Users shouldn't have to pay a fee for the system
to migrate their info to a more efficient location. So I wrote my own
program and did the `InitiateTeleport` accounting on my own to send a
program with `UnpaidExecution`. Have discussed an
`InitiateUnpaidTeleport` instruction with @franciscoaguirre . Obviously
any chain executing this would have to pass a `Barrier` for free
execution.
TODO:
- [x] Confirm People Chain ParaId
- [x] Confirm People Chain deposit rates (determined in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281)
- [x] Add pallet to Westend
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Adds a `NodeFeatures` bitfield value to the runtime `HostConfiguration`,
with the purpose of coordinating the enabling of node-side features,
such as: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/628 and
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/598.
These are features that require all validators enable them at the same
time, assuming all/most nodes have upgraded their node versions.
This PR doesn't add any feature yet. These are coming in future PRs.
Also adds a runtime API for querying the state of the client features
and an extrinsic for setting/unsetting a feature by its index in the bitfield.
Note: originally part of:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1644, but posted as
standalone to be reused by other PRs until the initial PR is merged
## Motivation
`pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality,
including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and
`reserve_transfer_assets()` calls.
While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()`
works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and
beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_.
## Solution
This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to
support transfers when reserves are other chains.
This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset
transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`.
Enables following scenarios:
- transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff
asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases),
- transferring assets with reserve on destination,
- transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff
assets and fees have same remote reserve),
- transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the
asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset
with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains,
even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve,
- transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using
fees which can be teleported between involved chains.
All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having
to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario
and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built
automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and
trusted reserves.
#### Current limitations:
- while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or
fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among
themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly
enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely
increased in the future).
- `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote**
reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more
complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future
holds).
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055
---------
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Remove the `GRANDPA_AUTHORITIES_KEY` key and its usage. Apparently this
was used in the early days to communicate the grandpa authorities to the
node. However, we have now a runtime api that does this for us. So, this
pull request is moving from the custom managed storage item to a FRAME
managed storage item.
This pr also includes a migration for doing the switch on a running
chain.
---------
Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <davxy@datawok.net>
We are introducing a new set of `XcmController` traits (final name yet
to be determined).
These traits are implemented by `pallet-xcm` and allows other pallets,
such as `pallet_contracts`, to rely on these traits instead of tight
coupling them to `pallet-xcm`.
Using only the existing Xcm traits would mean duplicating the logic from
`pallet-xcm` in these other pallets, which we aim to avoid. Our
objective is to ensure that when these APIs are called from
`pallet-contracts`, they produce the exact same outcomes as if called
directly from `pallet-xcm`.
The other benefits is that we can also expose return values to
`pallet-contracts` instead of just calling `pallet-xcm` dispatchable and
getting a `DispatchResult` back.
See traits integration in this PR
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1248, where the traits
are used as follow to define and implement `pallet-contracts` Config.
```rs
// Contracts config:
pub trait Config: frame_system::Config {
// ...
/// A type that exposes XCM APIs, allowing contracts to interact with other parachains, and
/// execute XCM programs.
type Xcm: xcm_executor::traits::Controller<
OriginFor<Self>,
<Self as frame_system::Config>::RuntimeCall,
BlockNumberFor<Self>,
>;
}
// implementation
impl pallet_contracts::Config for Runtime {
// ...
type Xcm = pallet_xcm::Pallet<Self>;
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
One for local networks with `fast-runtime` feature activated (1 minute
sessions) and one without the feature activated that will be the default
that runs with 1 hour long sessions.
Changes:
- Adds a new call `remove_key` to the sudo pallet to permanently remove
the sudo key.
- Remove some clones and general maintenance
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Part of #2186
The only usage of pallet-asset-rate is guarded by `runtime-benchmarks`
feature. I don't want ORML to be forced to include this pallet in deps
for no good reason.
This PR is a follow up to #1661
- [x] rename the `simple` module to `legacy`
- [x] fix benchmarks to disregard the number of additional fields
- [x] change the storage deposits to charge per encoded byte of the
identity information instance, removing the need for `fn
additional(&self) -> usize` in `IdentityInformationProvider`
- [x] ~add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change
above~
- [ ] ~ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based
deposit is always lower than whatever is reserved now~
- [x] remove `IdentityFields` from the `set_fields` extrinsic signature,
as per [this
discussion](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#discussion_r1371703403)
> ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based deposit is
always lower than whatever is reserved now
Not sure this is needed anymore. If the new deposits are higher than
what is currently on chain and users don't have enough funds to reserve
what is needed, the extrinisc fails and they're basically grandfathered
and frozen until they add more funds and/or make a change to their
identity. This behavior seems fine to me. Original idea
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#issuecomment-1779606319).
> add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change above
This was initially implemented but now removed from this PR in favor of
the implementation detailed
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2088).
---------
Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <joe@parity.io>
(imported from https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/pull/2157)
## Changes
This MR refactores the XCMP, Parachains System and DMP pallets to use
the [MessageQueue](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/12485)
for delayed execution of incoming messages. The DMP pallet is entirely
replaced by the MQ and thereby removed. This allows for PoV-bounded
execution and resolves a number of issues that stem from the current
work-around.
All System Parachains adopt this change.
The most important changes are in `primitives/core/src/lib.rs`,
`parachains/common/src/process_xcm_message.rs`,
`pallets/parachain-system/src/lib.rs`, `pallets/xcmp-queue/src/lib.rs`
and the runtime configs.
### DMP Queue Pallet
The pallet got removed and its logic refactored into parachain-system.
Overweight message management can be done directly through the MQ
pallet.
Final undeployment migrations are provided by
`cumulus_pallet_dmp_queue::UndeployDmpQueue` and `DeleteDmpQueue` that
can be configured with an aux config trait like:
```rust
parameter_types! {
pub const DmpQueuePalletName: &'static str = \"DmpQueue\" < CHANGE ME;
pub const RelayOrigin: AggregateMessageOrigin = AggregateMessageOrigin::Parent;
}
impl cumulus_pallet_dmp_queue::MigrationConfig for Runtime {
type PalletName = DmpQueuePalletName;
type DmpHandler = frame_support::traits::EnqueueWithOrigin<MessageQueue, RelayOrigin>;
type DbWeight = <Runtime as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight;
}
// And adding them to your Migrations tuple:
pub type Migrations = (
...
cumulus_pallet_dmp_queue::UndeployDmpQueue<Runtime>,
cumulus_pallet_dmp_queue::DeleteDmpQueue<Runtime>,
);
```
### XCMP Queue pallet
Removed all dispatch queue functionality. Incoming XCMP messages are now
either: Immediately handled if they are Signals, enqueued into the MQ
pallet otherwise.
New config items for the XCMP queue pallet:
```rust
/// The actual queue implementation that retains the messages for later processing.
type XcmpQueue: EnqueueMessage<ParaId>;
/// How a XCM over HRMP from a sibling parachain should be processed.
type XcmpProcessor: ProcessMessage<Origin = ParaId>;
/// The maximal number of suspended XCMP channels at the same time.
#[pallet::constant]
type MaxInboundSuspended: Get<u32>;
```
How to configure those:
```rust
// Use the MessageQueue pallet to store messages for later processing. The `TransformOrigin` is needed since
// the MQ pallet itself operators on `AggregateMessageOrigin` but we want to enqueue `ParaId`s.
type XcmpQueue = TransformOrigin<MessageQueue, AggregateMessageOrigin, ParaId, ParaIdToSibling>;
// Process XCMP messages from siblings. This is type-safe to only accept `ParaId`s. They will be dispatched
// with origin `Junction::Sibling(…)`.
type XcmpProcessor = ProcessFromSibling<
ProcessXcmMessage<
AggregateMessageOrigin,
xcm_executor::XcmExecutor<xcm_config::XcmConfig>,
RuntimeCall,
>,
>;
// Not really important what to choose here. Just something larger than the maximal number of channels.
type MaxInboundSuspended = sp_core::ConstU32<1_000>;
```
The `InboundXcmpStatus` storage item was replaced by
`InboundXcmpSuspended` since it now only tracks inbound queue suspension
and no message indices anymore.
Now only sends the most recent channel `Signals`, as all prio ones are
out-dated anyway.
### Parachain System pallet
For `DMP` messages instead of forwarding them to the `DMP` pallet, it
now pushes them to the configured `DmpQueue`. The message processing
which was triggered in `set_validation_data` is now being done by the MQ
pallet `on_initialize`.
XCMP messages are still handed off to the `XcmpMessageHandler`
(XCMP-Queue pallet) - no change here.
New config items for the parachain system pallet:
```rust
/// Queues inbound downward messages for delayed processing.
///
/// Analogous to the `XcmpQueue` of the XCMP queue pallet.
type DmpQueue: EnqueueMessage<AggregateMessageOrigin>;
```
How to configure:
```rust
/// Use the MQ pallet to store DMP messages for delayed processing.
type DmpQueue = MessageQueue;
```
## Message Flow
The flow of messages on the parachain side. Messages come in from the
left via the `Validation Data` and finally end up at the `Xcm Executor`
on the right.
## Further changes
- Bumped the default suspension, drop and resume thresholds in
`QueueConfigData::default()`.
- `XcmpQueue::{suspend_xcm_execution, resume_xcm_execution}` errors when
they would be a noop.
- Properly validate the `QueueConfigData` before setting it.
- Marked weight files as auto-generated so they wont auto-expand in the
MR files view.
- Move the `hypothetical` asserts to `frame_support` under the name
`experimental_hypothetically`
Questions:
- [ ] What about the ugly `#[cfg(feature = \"runtime-benchmarks\")]` in
the runtimes? Not sure how to best fix. Just having them like this makes
tests fail that rely on the real message processor when the feature is
enabled.
- [ ] Need a good weight for `MessageQueueServiceWeight`. The scheduler
already takes 80% so I put it to 10% but that is quite low.
TODO:
- [x] Remove c&p code after
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6271
- [x] Use `HandleMessage` once it is public in Substrate
- [x] fix `runtime-benchmarks` feature
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6966
- [x] Benchmarks
- [x] Tests
- [ ] Migrate `InboundXcmpStatus` to `InboundXcmpSuspended`
- [x] Possibly cleanup Migrations (DMP+XCMP)
- [x] optional: create `TransformProcessMessageOrigin` in Substrate and
replace `ProcessFromSibling`
- [ ] Rerun weights on ref HW
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
helps https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/439.
closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/473.
PR link in the older substrate repository:
https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13498.
# Context
Rewards payout is processed today in a single block and limited to
`MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`. This number is currently 512 on both
Kusama and Polkadot.
This PR tries to scale the nominators payout to an unlimited count in a
multi-block fashion. Exposures are stored in pages, with each page
capped to a certain number (`MaxExposurePageSize`). Starting out, this
number would be the same as `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`, but
eventually, this number can be lowered through new runtime upgrades to
limit the rewardeable nominators per dispatched call instruction.
The changes in the PR are backward compatible.
## How payouts would work like after this change
Staking exposes two calls, 1) the existing `payout_stakers` and 2)
`payout_stakers_by_page`.
### payout_stakers
This remains backward compatible with no signature change. If for a
given era a validator has multiple pages, they can call `payout_stakers`
multiple times. The pages are executed in an ascending sequence and the
runtime takes care of preventing double claims.
### payout_stakers_by_page
Very similar to `payout_stakers` but also accepts an extra param
`page_index`. An account can choose to payout rewards only for an
explicitly passed `page_index`.
**Lets look at an example scenario**
Given an active validator on Kusama had 1100 nominators,
`MaxExposurePageSize` set to 512 for Era e. In order to pay out rewards
to all nominators, the caller would need to call `payout_stakers` 3
times.
- `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the first 512
nominators.
- `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the second set of 512
nominators.
- `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the last set of 76
nominators.
...
- `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => calling it the 4th time would
return an error `InvalidPage`.
The above calls can also be replaced by `payout_stakers_by_page` and
passing a `page_index` explicitly.
## Commission note
Validator commission is paid out in chunks across all the pages where
each commission chunk is proportional to the total stake of the current
page. This implies higher the total stake of a page, higher will be the
commission. If all the pages of a validator's single era are paid out,
the sum of commission paid to the validator across all pages should be
equal to what the commission would have been if we had a non-paged
exposure.
### Migration Note
Strictly speaking, we did not need to bump our storage version since
there is no migration of storage in this PR. But it is still useful to
mark a storage upgrade for the following reasons:
- New storage items are introduced in this PR while some older storage
items are deprecated.
- For the next `HistoryDepth` eras, the exposure would be incrementally
migrated to its corresponding paged storage item.
- Runtimes using staking pallet would strictly need to wait at least
`HistoryDepth` eras with current upgraded version (14) for the migration
to complete. At some era `E` such that `E >
era_at_which_V14_gets_into_effect + HistoryDepth`, we will upgrade to
version X which will remove the deprecated storage items.
In other words, it is a strict requirement that E<sub>x</sub> -
E<sub>14</sub> > `HistoryDepth`, where
E<sub>x</sub> = Era at which deprecated storages are removed from
runtime,
E<sub>14</sub> = Era at which runtime is upgraded to version 14.
- For Polkadot and Kusama, there is a [tracker
ticket](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433) to clean
up the deprecated storage items.
### Storage Changes
#### Added
- ErasStakersOverview
- ClaimedRewards
- ErasStakersPaged
#### Deprecated
The following can be cleaned up after 84 eras which is tracked
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433).
- ErasStakers.
- ErasStakersClipped.
- StakingLedger.claimed_rewards, renamed to
StakingLedger.legacy_claimed_rewards.
### Config Changes
- Renamed MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator to MaxExposurePageSize.
### TODO
- [x] Tracker ticket for cleaning up the old code after 84 eras.
- [x] Add companion.
- [x] Redo benchmarks before merge.
- [x] Add Changelog for pallet_staking.
- [x] Pallet should be configurable to enable/disable paged rewards.
- [x] Commission payouts are distributed across pages.
- [x] Review documentation thoroughly.
- [x] Rename `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator` ->
`MaxExposurePageSize`.
- [x] NMap for `ErasStakersPaged`.
- [x] Deprecate ErasStakers.
- [x] Integrity tests.
### Followup issues
[Runtime api for deprecated ErasStakers storage
item](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/426)
---------
Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <javier@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <ross@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
# Description
The `trigger_defensive` call has been added to the `root-testing`
pallet. The idea is to have this pallet running on `Rococo/Westend` and
use it to verify if the runtime monitoring works end-to-end.
To accomplish this, `trigger_defensive` dispatches an event when it is
called.
Closes#1953
# Checklist
- [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the
"Description" section above
- [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements](CONTRIBUTING.md#Process)
of this project (at minimum one label for `T`
required)
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if
applicable)
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works (if applicable)
You can remove the "Checklist" section once all have been checked. Thank
you for your contribution!
✄
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
We shouldn't override with their default fields that have been added in
the previous version(v8), because we are going to lose whatever values have
been set.
Note, v8 & v9 seems to have landed at the same time on Rococo, probably
they will land at the same time on westend and other chains, so functionally
doesn't make much difference, but let's have this fixed for people that copy-paste
:D, like me.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <alexandru.gheorghe@parity.io>
Adds a config file that allows to run `zepter` without any arguments in
the workspace to address all issues.
A secondary workflow for the CI is provided as `zepter run check`. Both
the formatting and linting are now in one check for efficiancy.
The latest version also detects some more things that `featalign` was
already showing.
Error message [in the
CI](https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/3916205)
now looks like this:
```pre
...
crate 'test-parachains' (/Users/vados/Documents/work/polkadot-sdk/polkadot/parachain/test-parachains/Cargo.toml)
feature 'std'
must propagate to:
parity-scale-codec
Found 55 issues (run with --fix to fix).
Error: Command 'lint propagate-feature' failed with exit code 1
Polkadot-SDK uses the Zepter CLI to detect abnormalities in the feature configuration.
It looks like one more more checks failed; please check the console output. You can try to automatically address them by running `zepter`.
Otherwise please ask directly in the Merge Request, GitHub Discussions or on Matrix Chat, thank you.
For more information, see:
- https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1831
- https://github.com/ggwpez/zepter
```
TODO:
- [x] Check that CI fails correctly
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Fixes#179
# Description
This PR makes the structure containing identity information used in
`pallet-identity` generic through the pallet `Config`. Additionally, the
old structure is now available in a separate module called `simple`
(pending rename) and is compatible with the new interface.
Another change in this PR is that while the `additional` field in
`IdentityInfo` stays for backwards compatibility reasons, the associated
costs are stil present in the pallet through the `additional` function
in the `IdentityInformationProvider` interface. This function is marked
as deprecated as it is only a temporary solution to the backwards
compatibility problem we had. In short, we could have removed the
additional fields in the struct and done a migration, but we chose to
wait and do it off-chain through the genesis of the system parachain.
After we move the identity pallet to the parachain, additional fields
will be migrated into the existing fields and the `additional` key-value
store will be removed. Until that happens, this interface will provide
the necessary information to properly account for the associated costs.
Additionally, this PR fixes an unrelated issue; the `IdentityField` enum
used to represent the fields as bitflags couldn't store more than 8
fields, even though it was marked as `#[repr(u64)]`. This was because of
the `derive` implementation of `TypeInfo`, which assumed `u8` semantics.
The custom implementation of this trait in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/commit/0105cc0396b7a53d0b290f48b1225847f6d17321
fixes the issue.
---------
Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Sam Johnson <sam@durosoft.com>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1882
## Breaking Changes
This PR introduces a new item to `pallet_balances::Config`:
```diff
trait Config {
++ type RuntimeFreezeReasons;
}
```
This value is only used to check it against `type MaxFreeze`. A similar
check has been added for `MaxHolds` against `RuntimeHoldReasons`, which
is already given to `pallet_balances`.
In all contexts, you should pass the real `RuntimeFreezeReasons`
generated by `construct_runtime` to `type RuntimeFreezeReasons`. Passing
`()` would also work, but it would imply that the runtime uses no
freezes at all.
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
## Problem
This PR addresses the issue with testnet AssetHub builds, which was
discovered during the execution of `bot bench`.
https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4038738
```
Compiling asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm v1.0.0 (/builds/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/target/production/wbuild/asset-hub-rococo-runtime)
warning: Linking globals named 'Core_version': symbol multiply defined!
error: failed to load bitcode of module "rococo_runtime-8799ee884447805a.rococo_runtime.0bc572b8-cgu.0.rcgu.o":
warning: `asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm` (lib) generated 1 warning
error: could not compile `asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm` (lib) due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```
https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4038739
```
Compiling asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm v1.0.0 (/builds/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/target/production/wbuild/asset-hub-westend-runtime)
warning: Linking globals named 'Core_version': symbol multiply defined!
error: failed to load bitcode of module "westend_runtime-86d7844430f97d5c.westend_runtime.b7678d03-cgu.0.rcgu.o":
warning: `asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm` (lib) generated 1 warning
error: could not compile `asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm` (lib) due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```
## Solution
- Removed dependencies on `rococo-runtime` and `westend-runtime`
introduced by [this
PR](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1234/files#diff-a86375df98e04ca3cce1ea35c40257a222e2d5087f5f528ff33307678b78dc2dR534-R550).
- Replaced `<rococo_runtime::Treasury as PalletInfoAccess>::index()`
with `rococo_runtime_constants::TREASURY_PALLET_ID`.
- Added `check_treasury_pallet_id` to the relay runtimes to ensure that
the constant is aligned with the pallet id.
- Added "Rococo Treasury" to the waived locations (that will not be
charged fees in the executor) for `BridgeHubRococo` (to be aligned with
AssetHubs).
## References
[Full element discussion
here](https://matrix.to/#/!JUeaZUiYbdrvzvtwSL:parity.io/$2PnjYMsWRjR7M3oOfGuRI0XkjdoqJLtRcAPVcDLuLVg?via=parity.io&via=web3.foundation).
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
The migration was missing to migrate `AvailabilityCores`. If this isn't
migrated, all parachains in the availability phase would stall until the
next session is started. This pull request fixes this by migrating this
data. Besides that it is doing some cosmetics.
The `xcm` crate was renamed to `staging-xcm` to be able to publish it to
crates.io as someone as squatted `xcm`. The problem with this rename is
that the `TypeInfo` includes the crate name which ultimately lands in
the metadata. The metadata is consumed by downstream users like
`polkadot-js` or people building on top of `polkadot-js`. These people
are using the entire `path` to find the type in the type registry. Thus,
their code would break as the type path would now be [`staging_xcm`,
`VersionedXcm`] instead of [`xcm`, `VersionedXcm`]. This pull request
fixes this by renaming the path segment `staging_xcm` to `xcm`.
This requires: https://github.com/paritytech/scale-info/pull/197
---------
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Combination of paritytech/polkadot#7005, its addon PR
paritytech/polkadot#7585 and its companion paritytech/cumulus#2433.
This PR introduces a new XcmFeesToAccount struct which implements the
`FeeManager` trait, and assigns this struct as the `FeeManager` in the
XCM config for all runtimes.
The struct simply deposits all fees handled by the XCM executor to a
specified account. In all runtimes, the specified account is configured
as the treasury account.
XCM __delivery__ fees are now being introduced (unless the root origin
is sending a message to a system parachain on behalf of the originating
chain).
# Note for reviewers
Most file changes are tests that had to be modified to account for the
new fees.
Main changes are in:
- cumulus/pallets/xcmp-queue/src/lib.rs <- To make it track the delivery
fees exponential factor
- polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/fee_handling.rs <- Added. Has the
FeeManager implementation
- All runtime xcm_config files <- To add the FeeManager to the XCM
configuration
# Important note
After this change, instructions that create and send a new XCM (Query*,
Report*, ExportMessage, InitiateReserveWithdraw, InitiateTeleport,
DepositReserveAsset, TransferReserveAsset, LockAsset and RequestUnlock)
will require the corresponding origin account in the origin register to
pay for transport delivery fees, and the onward message will fail to be
sent if the origin account does not have the required amount. This
delivery fee is on top of what we already collect as tx fees in
pallet-xcm and XCM BuyExecution fees!
Wallet UIs that want to expose the new delivery fee can do so using the
formula:
```
delivery_fee_factor * (base_fee + encoded_msg_len * per_byte_fee)
```
where the delivery fee factor can be obtained from the corresponding
pallet based on which transport you are using (UMP, HRMP or bridges),
the base fee is a constant, the encoded message length from the message
itself and the per byte fee is the same as the configured per byte fee
for txs (i.e. `TransactionByteFee`).
---------
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Giles Cope <gilescope@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
Oliver Tale-Yazdi