Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and
adds CI to keep them tidy.
If people want we can customise the format rules as described here
https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html
@ggwpez, I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are
propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and
conflicts.
TODO
- [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet
tests instead of deleting the dir
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
This moves the macro related re-exports to `__private` to make it more
obvious for downstream users that they are using an internal api.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
# Description
- What does this PR do?
While working with `pallet_nfts` through `nonfungibles_v2` traits
`Inspect, Mutate`, I found out that once you have set the collection
attribute with `<Nfts as Mutate>::set_collection_attribute()`, it's not
possible to read it with `<Nfts as Inspect>::collection_attribute()`
since they use different `namespace` values. When setting the attribute,
`AttributeNamespace::Pallet` is used, while
`AttributeNamespace::CollectionOwner` is used when reading.
more context:
https://github.com/freeverseio/laos/issues/7#issuecomment-1766137370
This PR makes `item` an optional parameter in
`Inspect::system_attribute()`, to be able to read collection attributes.
- Why are these changes needed?
To be able to read collection level attributes when reading attributes
of the collection. It will be possible to read collection attributes by
passing `None` for `item`
- How were these changes implemented and what do they affect?
`NftsApi` is also affected and `NftsApi::system_attribute()` now accepts
optional `item` parameter.
## Breaking change
Because of the change in the `NftsApi::system_attribute()` method's
`item` param, parachains who integrated the `NftsApi` need to update
their API code and frontend integrations accordingly. AssetHubs are
unaffected since the NftsApi wasn't released on those parachains yet.
Liam Aharon