* Add `without_storage_info`
The MaxEncodedLen trait is now enforced by default in Substrate.
All pallets missing an implementation need to be marked with
`without_storage_info` now.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Remove `generate_storage_info`
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Add more `without_storage_info`
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* update lockfile for {"substrate"}
Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
* fix miscalculation of remaining weight
* rename a var
* move out enforcing filtering by dropping inherents
* prepare for dispute statement validity check being split off
* refactor
* refactor, only check disputes we actually want to include
* more refactor and documentation
* refactor and minimize inherent checks
* chore: warnings
* fix a few tests
* fix dedup regression
* fix
* more asserts in tests
* remove some asserts
* chore: fmt
* skip signatures checks, some more
* undo unwatend changes
* Update runtime/parachains/src/paras_inherent/mod.rs
Co-authored-by: sandreim <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
* cleanups, checking CheckedDisputeStatments makes no sense
* integrity, if called create_inherent_inner, it shall do the checks, and not rely on enter_inner
* review comments
* use from impl rather than into
* remove outdated comment
* adjust tests accordingly
* assure no weight is lost
* address review comments
* remove unused import
* split error into two and document
* use assurance, O(n)
* Revert "adjust tests accordingly"
This reverts commit 3cc9a3c449f82db38cea22c48f4a21876603374b.
* fix comment
* fix sorting
* comment
Co-authored-by: sandreim <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
if the PVF pre-checking is disabled the runtime dispatchable will reject
any attempts of submission. This is also concern the unsigned tx
validation.
Right now, the `include_pvf_check_statement` dispatchable is effectively
uncallable because of the weight set to the maximum value. If we were to
benchmark it, it would become includable in a block, but since there
will be no active votes, the dispatchable won't do anything.
However, it will execute some code, like signature validation and
querying some storage entries. To be completely safe, we can bail out
early if the `pvf_checking_enabled` config is disabled. That's what this
PR does.
In this PR, paras module emit runtime events on certain PVF pre-checking
related conditions.
Specifically, there are 3 new events in the paras module:
1. PvfCheckStarted
2. PvfCheckAccepted
3. PvfCheckRejected
All of those have identifiers for the parachain that triggered the PVF
pre-checking and the validation code that goes through the pre-checking.
The mechanics of those are as follows. Each time a new PVF is added, be
it due to onboarding or upgrading, the `PvfCheckStarted` will be
triggered. If another parachain triggers a pre-checking process for the
validation code which is already being pre-checked, another
`PvfCheckStarted` event will be triggered with the corresponding para
id.
When the PVF pre-checking voting for a PVF was finished, several
`PvfCheckAccepted/Rejected` events will be triggered: one for each para id that
was subscribed to this check (i.e. was a "cause" for it).
If the PVF pre-checking is disabled, then one can still expect these
events to be fired. Since insta PVF approval is syncronous, the
`PvfCheckStarted` will be followed by the `PvfCheckAccepted` with the
same validation code and para id.
If somebody is interested in following validation code changes for a PVF
of a parachain, they would need to subscribe to those events. I did not
supply the topics for the events, since I am not sure if that's needed
or will be used, but they can be added later if needed.
Closes#3971
Read the linked issue.
Apart from that, this addresses the concern raised in this [comment] by
just adding a test. I couldn't find a clean way to reconcile a block
number delay with a PVF voting TTL, so I just resorted to rely on the
test. Should be fine for now.
[comment]: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/4457#discussion_r770517562
* paras: add governance control dispatchables
Adds a couple of functions for governance control for the paras module
in the anticipation of PVF pre-checking enabling.
Specifically, this commit adds a function for pre-registering a PVF that
governance trusts enough. This function will come in handy in case there
is a parachain that does not follow the GoAhead signal. That is, does
not include https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/pull/517.
This may be not an exhaustive list of the functions that may come in
handy. Any suggestions to add more are welcome.
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=kusama-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/kusama/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras.rs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=polkadot-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/polkadot/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras.rs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=westend-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/westend/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras.rs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=rococo-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/rococo/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras.rs
Co-authored-by: Parity Bot <admin@parity.io>
Closes#4248
Impose additional constraint on configuration consistency:
`validation_upgrade_delay` should not be less than or equal to 1.
See the original issue for more details.
Setting zero as weight may be a source of problems.
The problem is, a rogue validator can shove a lot of duplicated votes
and thus fill a block with work that may well exceed the weight limit.
This commit refactors the consistency checks. Instead of each individual
setter performs its checks locally, we delegate those checks to the
already existing function `check_consistency`. This removes duplication
and simplifies the logic.
A motivating example of this one is the next PR in the stack that will
introduce a check for a field, which validity depends on the validity of
other two fields. Without this refactoring we will have to place a check
not only to the field in question, but also to the other two fields so
that if they are changed they do not violate consistency criteria. It's
easy to imagine how this can go unwieldy with the number of checks.
This also adds a test that verifies that the default chain spec host
configuration is consistent.
* merge master (do not compile)
* fix
* lock
* update lock
* Update to refactoring.
* runtime version
* fmt
* remove trie patch
* remove patch
* No layout alias for bridge proof.
* update depupdate depss
* No switch until migration.
* master lock
* test
* test
* Revert "test"
This reverts commit 57325ef73332bf4b054aa4a667bb716fcf8a0d89.
* Revert "test"
This reverts commit ce74d0e2062806f72c0e9e9ca07b14165f43521e.
* rename feature
* state version as parameter, use the feature only on runtimes.
* update
* update to state version in runtime
* state version from storage
* update lockfile for substrate
Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
* First step in implementing https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/4386
This PR:
- Reduces MAX_UNSHARED_UPLOAD_TIME to 150ms
- Increases timeout on collation fetching to 1200ms
- Reduces limit on needed backing votes in the runtime
This PR does not yet reduce the number of needed backing votes on the
node as this can only be meaningfully enacted once the changed limit in
the runtime is live.
* Fix tests.
* Guide updates.
* Review remarks.
* Bump minimum required backing votes to 2 in runtime.
* Make sure node side code won't make runtime vomit.
* cargo +nightly fmt
Refactor the configuration module's initializer_on_new_session in such a
way that it returns the configuration. This would make it inline with
other special initialization routines like `shared`'s or `paras`.
This will be useful in a following PR that will check consistency of the
configuration before setting it.
* parachains: Fix configuration module
Closes#4529Closes#4533
I figured that trying to avoid updates does not really worth it to keep.
This is because we seem to not update the configuration often and when
we do we approach this carefully. Thus possibility of a redundant update
is really negligable. At the same time, if such a redundant update does
happen then the effects of that are really small: just some wasted
storage interactions.
On the other hand, making it work was a little bit annoying. With the
proper fix for the pending updates this would be even more annoying
since now we would have to add combinatorically more cases to test this.
So I figured that I will just scrap that and simplify the code.
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=kusama-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::configuration --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/kusama/src/weights/runtime_parachains_configuration.rs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=polkadot-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::configuration --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/polkadot/src/weights/runtime_parachains_configuration.rs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=westend-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::configuration --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/westend/src/weights/runtime_parachains_configuration.rs
* review fixes
Co-authored-by: Parity Bot <admin@parity.io>
* pvf-precheck: Integrate PVF pre-checking into paras module
Closes#4009
This is the most of the runtime-side change needed for #3211.
Here is how it works.
The PVF pre-checking can be triggered either by an upgrade or by
onboarding (i.e. calling `schedule_para_initialize`). The PVF
pre-checking process is identified by the PVF code hash that is being
voted on. If there is already PVF pre-checking process running, then no
new PVF pre-checking process will be started. Instead, we just subscribe
to the existing one.
If there is no PVF pre-checking process running but the PVF code hash
was already saved in the storage, that necessarily means (I invite the
reviewers to double-check this invariant) that the PVF already passed
pre-checking. This is equivalent to instant approving of the PVF.
The pre-checking process can be concluded either by obtaining a
supermajority or if it expires.
Each validator checks the list of PVFs available for voting. The vote is
binary, i.e. accept or reject a given PVF. As soon as the supermajority
of votes are collected for one of the sides of the vote, the voting is
concluded in that direction and the effects of the voting are enacted.
Only validators from the active set can participate in the vote. The set
of active validators can change each session. That's why we reset the
votes each session. A voting that observed a certain number of sessions
will be rejected.
The effects of the PVF accepting depend on the operations requested it:
1. All onboardings subscribed to the approved PVF pre-checking process will
get scheduled and after passing 2 session boundaries they will be onboarded.
2. All upgrades subscribed to the approved PVF pre-checking process will
get scheduled very similarly to the existing process. Upgrades with
pre-checking are really the same process that is just delayed by the
time required for pre-checking voting. In case of instant approval the
mechanism is exactly the same. This is important from parachains
compatibility standpoint since following the delayed upgrade requires
the parachain to implement
https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/pull/517.
In case, PVF pre-checking process was concluded with rejection, then all
the requesting operations get cancelled. For onboarding it means it gets
without movement: the lifecycle of such parachain is terminated on the
`Onboarding` state and after rejection the lifecycle is none. That in
turn means that the caller can attempt registering the parachain once
more. For upgrading it means that the upgrade process is aborted: that
flashes go-ahead signal with `Abort` flag.
Rejection leads to removing the allegedly bad validation code from the
chain storage. Among other things, this implies that the operation can
be re-requested. That allows for retrying an operation in case there was
some bug. At the same time it does not look as a DoS vector due to the
caching performed by the nodes.
PVF pre-checking can be enabled and disabled. Initially, according to
the changes in #4420, this mechanism is disabled. Triggering the PVF
pre-checking when it is disabled just means that we insta approve the
requesting operation. This should lead to the behavior being unchanged.
Follow-ups:
- expose runtime APIs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=polkadot-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/polkadot/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras.rs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=westend-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/westend/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras.rs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=kusama-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/kusama/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras.rs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=rococo-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/rococo/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras.rs
* Review fixes
Co-authored-by: Parity Bot <admin@parity.io>
* remove Default from CandidateHash
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Andronik Ordian <write@reusable.software>
* chore: fmt
* remove backed candidate default
* Partial migration away from CandidateReceipt::default
* Remove more CandidateReceipt defaults
* fmt
* Mostly remove CommittedCandidateReceipt default usage
* Remove CommittedCandidateReceipt
* Remove more Defaults from polakdot primitives v1 + fmt
* Remove more Default from polkadot primites v1
* WIP trying to get overseer example + tests to compile
* feat: add primitives test helpers
* reduce deps of helper
* update primitive helpers
* make candidate validation compile
* fixup cargo lock
* make av-store compile
* fixup disputes coordinator tests
* test: fixup backing
* test: fixup approval voting
* fixup bitfield signing
* test: fixup runtime-api
* test: fixup availability dist
* foxi[ pverseer test]
* remove some Defaults, remove bounds from `dummy`
All `fn dummy` in primitives need to be removed anyways.
This aids in the transition.
* it's a test helper, so always use std
* test: fixup parachains runtime tests
Excluding benches.
* fix keyring
* fix paras runtime properly, no more default
* Remove fn dummy() usage from approval voting
* Move TestCandidateBuilder out of av store to test helpers
* Make candidate validation tests pass
* Make most dispute coirdinator tests pass
* Make provisioner tests work
* Make availability recovery tests work with test helpers
* Update polkadot-collator-protocol tests
* Update statement distribution tests
* Update polkadot overseer examples and tests
* Derive default for validation code so we don't break unrelated things
* Make para runtime test pass (no bench)
* Some more work
* chore: cargo fmt
* cargo fix
* avoid some Default::default
* fixup dispute coordinator test
* remove unused crate deps
* remove Default::default wherever possible, replace by dummy_* for the most part
* chore: cargo fmt
* Remove some warnings
* Remove CommittedCandidateReceipt dummy
* Remove CandidateReceipt dummy
* Remove CandidateDescriptor dummy
* Remove commented out code
* Fix para runtime tests
* chore: nightly
* Some updates to the builder
* Dynamically adjust mock head data size
* Make dispute cooridinator tests work
* Fix test candidate_backing_reorders_votes work
* +nightly-2021-10-29 fmt
* Spelling and remove a default use in builder
* Various clean up
* More small updates
* fmt
* More small updates
* Doc comments for test helpers
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=kusama-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras_inherent --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/kusama/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras_inherent.rs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=polkadot-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras_inherent --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/polkadot/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras_inherent.rs
* Update lib.rs
* review comments
* fix warnings
* fix test by using correct candidate receipt relay parent
Co-authored-by: Andronik Ordian <write@reusable.software>
Co-authored-by: emostov <32168567+emostov@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Parity Bot <admin@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Gavin Wood <gavin@parity.io>
This PR is a part of #3211.
This PR adds three new fields into the `HostConfiguration` structure.
The fields are going to be used in PRs down the stack.
This change requires migration, so this PR performs runtime storage
migration for configuration module from version 1 to version 2.
This PR closes#4010 and subsumes #4177.
This PR is a part of
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/3211.
This PR prepares ground for the following runtime changes required for
PVF pre-checking. Specifically, we do several changes here:
1. We remove `validation_code_at` and `validation_code_hash_at`. Those
functions are not used. They were added in the early days with intent
to use it later but turned out that we do not need them.
2. We replace `validation_code_hash_at` with just `current_code_hash`
for the case of inclusion and candidate checking.
3. We also replace `last_code_upgrade` with a direct query into
`FutureCodeHash` and `UpgradeRestrictionSignal`. Those in conjunction
should replace the logic that was used for allowing/disallowing
upgrades. This requires special attention of the reviewers.
4. Then we remove the machinery required to support those queries.
Specifically the code related to `UseCodeAt`. We do not need it since
we do not answer the historical queries. However, we still leave all
the data on-chain. At some point we may clean it up, but that would
be needed to be done with a dedicated migration which can be done as
follow-up.
5. Some now irrelevant tests were removed and/or adapted.
* Improve paras runtime `BenchBuilder` api
* fix
* Improve doc comment
* Some doc improvemens'
* Use setters and no params for build
* +nightly-2021-10-29 fmt
* Clean up some comments
* Simplify set_code_upgrade
* Accept a slice for set_dispute_sessions
* Doc comments
* Spelling
* use impl AsRef
* Prepare for merge
* fmt
Co-authored-by: Bernhard Schuster <bernhard@ahoi.io>
* rococo-runtime: Switch to latest `construct_runtime!` syntax
Besides that it fixes pallet macro errors in other crates that popped up
because of this switch.
* FMT
Andronik