This tool makes it easy to run parachain consensus stress/performance
testing on your development machine or in CI.
## Motivation
The parachain consensus node implementation spans across many modules
which we call subsystems. Each subsystem is responsible for a small part
of logic of the parachain consensus pipeline, but in general the most
load and performance issues are localized in just a few core subsystems
like `availability-recovery`, `approval-voting` or
`dispute-coordinator`. In the absence of such a tool, we would run large
test nets to load/stress test these parts of the system. Setting up and
making sense of the amount of data produced by such a large test is very
expensive, hard to orchestrate and is a huge development time sink.
## PR contents
- CLI tool
- Data Availability Read test
- reusable mockups and components needed so far
- Documentation on how to get started
### Data Availability Read test
An overseer is built with using a real `availability-recovery` susbsytem
instance while dependent subsystems like `av-store`, `network-bridge`
and `runtime-api` are mocked. The network bridge will emulate all the
network peers and their answering to requests.
The test is going to be run for a number of blocks. For each block it
will generate send a “RecoverAvailableData” request for an arbitrary
number of candidates. We wait for the subsystem to respond to all
requests before moving to the next block.
At the same time we collect the usual subsystem metrics and task CPU
metrics and show some nice progress reports while running.
### Here is how the CLI looks like:
```
[2023-11-28T13:06:27Z INFO subsystem_bench::core::display] n_validators = 1000, n_cores = 20, pov_size = 5120 - 5120, error = 3, latency = Some(PeerLatency { min_latency: 1ms, max_latency: 100ms })
[2023-11-28T13:06:27Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Generating template candidate index=0 pov_size=5242880
[2023-11-28T13:06:27Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Created test environment.
[2023-11-28T13:06:27Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Pre-generating 60 candidates.
[2023-11-28T13:06:30Z INFO subsystem-bench::core] Initializing network emulation for 1000 peers.
[2023-11-28T13:06:30Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Current block 1/3
[2023-11-28T13:06:30Z INFO substrate_prometheus_endpoint] 〽️ Prometheus exporter started at 127.0.0.1:9999
[2023-11-28T13:06:30Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] 20 recoveries pending
[2023-11-28T13:06:37Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] Block time 6262ms
[2023-11-28T13:06:37Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Sleeping till end of block (0ms)
[2023-11-28T13:06:37Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Current block 2/3
[2023-11-28T13:06:37Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] 20 recoveries pending
[2023-11-28T13:06:43Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] Block time 6369ms
[2023-11-28T13:06:43Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Sleeping till end of block (0ms)
[2023-11-28T13:06:43Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Current block 3/3
[2023-11-28T13:06:43Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] 20 recoveries pending
[2023-11-28T13:06:49Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] Block time 6194ms
[2023-11-28T13:06:49Z INFO subsystem-bench::availability] Sleeping till end of block (0ms)
[2023-11-28T13:06:49Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] All blocks processed in 18829ms
[2023-11-28T13:06:49Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] Throughput: 102400 KiB/block
[2023-11-28T13:06:49Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability] Block time: 6276 ms
[2023-11-28T13:06:49Z INFO subsystem_bench::availability]
Total received from network: 415 MiB
Total sent to network: 724 KiB
Total subsystem CPU usage 24.00s
CPU usage per block 8.00s
Total test environment CPU usage 0.15s
CPU usage per block 0.05s
```
### Prometheus/Grafana stack in action
<img width="1246" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-28 at 15 11 10"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/54316454/eaa47422-4a5e-4a3a-aaef-14ca644c1574">
<img width="1246" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-28 at 15 12 01"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/54316454/237329d6-1710-4c27-8f67-5fb11d7f66ea">
<img width="1246" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-28 at 15 12 38"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/54316454/a07119e8-c9f1-4810-a1b3-f1b7b01cf357">
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
We currently use a bit of a hack in `.cargo/config` to make sure that
clippy isn't too annoying by specifying the list of lints.
There is now a stable way to define lints for a workspace. The only down
side is that every crate seems to have to opt into this so there's a
*few* files modified in this PR.
Dependencies:
- [x] PR that upgrades CI to use rust 1.74 is merged.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Closes#2326.
This PR both fixes a logic bug and replaces an incorrect name.
## Bug Fix: Respecting custom genesis builder
Prior to this PR the standard logic for creating a genesis block was
repeated inside of cumulus. This PR removes that duplicated logic, and
calls into the proper `BuildGenesisBlock` implementation.
One consequence is that if the genesis block has already been
initialized, it will not be re-created, but rather read from the
database like it is for other node invocations. So you need to watch out
for old unpurged data during the development process. Offchain tools may
need to be updated accordingly. I've already filed
https://github.com/paritytech/zombienet/issues/1519
## Rename: It doesn't export state. It exports head data.
The name export-genesis-state was always wrong, nad it's never too late
to right a wrong. I've changed the name of the struct to
`ExportGenesisHeadCommand`.
There is still the question of what to do with individual nodes' public
CLIs. I have updated the parachain template to a reasonable default that
preserves compatibility with tools that will expect
`export-genesis-state` to still work. And I've chosen not to modify the
public CLIs of any other nodes in the repo. I'll leave it up to their
individual owners/maintains to decide whether that is appropriate.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joshy Orndorff <git-user-email.h0ly5@simplelogin.com>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <info@kchr.de>
Initial implementation for the plan discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/701
Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178
v0: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7554,
## Overall idea
When approval-voting checks a candidate and is ready to advertise the
approval, defer it in a per-relay chain block until we either have
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT candidates to sign or a candidate has stayed
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS in the queue, in both cases we sign what
candidates we have available.
This should allow us to reduce the number of approvals messages we have
to create/send/verify. The parameters are configurable, so we should
find some values that balance:
- Security of the network: Delaying broadcasting of an approval
shouldn't but the finality at risk and to make sure that never happens
we won't delay sending a vote if we are past 2/3 from the no-show time.
- Scalability of the network: MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT = 1 &
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS =0, is what we have now and we know from
the measurements we did on versi, it bottlenecks
approval-distribution/approval-voting when increase significantly the
number of validators and parachains
- Block storage: In case of disputes we have to import this votes on
chain and that increase the necessary storage with
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT * CandidateHash per vote. Given that
disputes are not the normal way of the network functioning and we will
limit MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT in the single digits numbers, this
should be good enough. Alternatively, we could try to create a better
way to store this on-chain through indirection, if that's needed.
## Other fixes:
- Fixed the fact that we were sending random assignments to
non-validators, that was wrong because those won't do anything with it
and they won't gossip it either because they do not have a grid topology
set, so we would waste the random assignments.
- Added metrics to be able to debug potential no-shows and
mis-processing of approvals/assignments.
## TODO:
- [x] Get feedback, that this is moving in the right direction. @ordian
@sandreim @eskimor @burdges, let me know what you think.
- [x] More and more testing.
- [x] Test in versi.
- [x] Make MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT &
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_WAIT_MILLIS a parachain host configuration.
- [x] Make sure the backwards compatibility works correctly
- [x] Make sure this direction is compatible with other streams of work:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/635 &
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/742
- [x] Final versi burn-in before merging
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <alexandru.gheorghe@parity.io>
## Summary
This pull request proposes a solution for improved control of the
versioned XCM flow over the bridge (across different consensus chains)
and resolves the situation where the sending chain/consensus has already
migrated to a higher XCM version than the receiving chain/consensus.
## Problem/Motivation
The current flow over the bridge involves a transfer from AssetHubRococo
(AHR) to BridgeHubRococo (BHR) to BridgeHubWestend (BHW) and finally to
AssetHubWestend (AHW), beginning with a reserve-backed transfer on AHR.
In this process:
1. AHR sends XCM `ExportMessage` through `XcmpQueue`, incorporating XCM
version checks using the `WrapVersion` feature, influenced by
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion` (managed by
`pallet_xcm::force_xcm_version` or version discovery).
2. BHR handles the `ExportMessage` instruction, utilizing the latest XCM
version. The `HaulBlobExporter` converts the inner XCM to
[`VersionedXcm::from`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/63ac2471aa0210f0ac9903bdd7d8f9351f9a635f/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465-L467),
also using the latest XCM version.
However, challenges arise:
- Incompatibility when BHW uses a different version than BHR. For
instance, if BHR migrates to **XCMv4** while BHW remains on **XCMv3**,
BHR's `VersionedXcm::from` uses `VersionedXcm::V4` variant, causing
encoding issues for BHW.
```
/// Just a simulation of possible error, which could happen on BHW
/// (this code is based on actual master without XCMv4)
let encoded = hex_literal::hex!("0400");
println!("{:?}", VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(&mut &encoded[..]));
Err(Error { cause: None, desc: "Could not decode `VersionedXcm`, variant
doesn't exist" })
```
- Similar compatibility issues exist between AHR and AHW.
## Solution
This pull request introduces the following solutions:
1. **New trait `CheckVersion`** - added to the `xcm` module and exposing
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`. This enhancement allows checking the
actual XCM version for desired destinations outside of the `pallet_xcm`
module.
2. **Version Check in `HaulBlobExporter`** uses `CheckVersion` to check
known/configured destination versions, ensuring compatibility. For
example, in the scenario mentioned, BHR can store the version `3` for
BHW. If BHR is on XCMv4, it will attempt to downgrade the message to
version `3` instead of using the latest version `4`.
3. **Version Check in `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`** - this check
ensures compatibility with the real destination's XCM version,
preventing the unnecessary sending of messages to the local bridge hub
if versions are incompatible.
These additions aim to improve the control and compatibility of XCM
flows over the bridge and addressing issues related to version
mismatches.
## Possible alternative solution
_(More investigation is needed, and at the very least, it should extend
to XCMv4/5. If this proves to be a viable option, I can open an RFC for
XCM.)._
Add the `XcmVersion` attribute to the `ExportMessage` so that the
sending chain can determine, based on what is stored in
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`, the version the destination is using.
This way, we may not need to handle the version in `HaulBlobExporter`.
```
ExportMessage {
network: NetworkId,
destination: InteriorMultiLocation,
xcm: Xcm<()>
destination_xcm_version: Version, // <- new attritbute
},
```
```
pub trait ExportXcm {
fn validate(
network: NetworkId,
channel: u32,
universal_source: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
destination: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
message: &mut Option<Xcm<()>>,
destination_xcm_version: Version, , // <- new attritbute
) -> SendResult<Self::Ticket>;
```
## Future Directions
This PR does not fix version discovery over bridge, further
investigation will be conducted here:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2417.
## TODO
- [x] `pallet_xcm` mock for tests uses hard-coded XCM version `2` -
change to 3 or lastest?
- [x] fix `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`
- [x] fix HaulBlobExporter with version determination
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/2183669d05f9b510f979a0cc3c7847707bacba2e/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465)
- [x] add unit-tests to the runtimes
- [x] run benchmarks for `ExportMessage`
- [x] extend local run scripts about `force_xcm_version(dest, version)`
- [ ] when merged, prepare governance calls for Rococo/Westend
- [ ] add PRDoc
Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2719
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved
in a release and build:
- the changelog
- a simple draft of audience documentation
Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version
1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file.
This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content
allowing to properly generate the changelog.
The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience
documentation.
The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when
all PR come with a proper `prdoc`.
## Assumptions
- the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under
`prdoc/X.Y.Z`
- the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author +
topic. Thos fields are optional.
The build script can be called as:
```
VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh
```
Related:
- #1408
---------
Co-authored-by: EgorPopelyaev <egor@parity.io>
Partially Addresses #2500
Adds a `deprecate_controller_batch` call to the staking pallet that is
callable by `Root` and `StakingAdmin`. To be used for controller account
deprecation and removed thereafter. Adds
`MaxControllersDeprecationBatch` pallet constant that defines max
possible deprecations per call.
- [x] Add `deprecate_controller_batch` call, and
`MaxControllersInDeprecationBatch` constant.
- [x] Add tests, benchmark, weights. Tests that weight is only consumed
if unique pair.
- [x] Adds `StakingAdmin` origin to staking's `AdminOrigin` type in
westend runtime.
- [x] Determined that worst case 5,900 deprecations does fit into
`maxBlock` `proofSize` and `refTime` in both normal and operational
thresholds, meaning we can deprecate all controllers for each network in
one call.
## Block Weights
By querying `consts.system.blockWeights` we can see that the
`deprecate_controller_batch` weights fit within the `normal` threshold
on Polkadot.
#### `controller_deprecation_batch` where i = 5900:
#### Ref time: 69,933,325,300
#### Proof size: 21,040,390
### Polkadot
```
// consts.query.blockWeights
maxBlock: {
refTime: 2,000,000,000,000
proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
}
normal: {
maxExtrinsic: {
refTime: 1,479,873,955,000
proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195
}
maxTotal: {
refTime: 1,500,000,000,000
proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711
}
}
```
### Kusama
```
// consts.query.blockWeights
maxBlock: {
refTime: 2,000,000,000,000
proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
}
normal: {
maxExtrinsic: {
refTime: 1,479,875,294,000
proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195
}
maxTotal: {
refTime: 1,500,000,000,000
proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <g6pestana@gmail.com>
This PR makes the block number provider configurable through the Config
trait in pallet-vesting, this gives parachains the option to use the
relay chain block number provider from ParachainSystem.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Treasury Pallet Instance for the Fellowship in Westend Collectives.
In this update, we present a Treasury Pallet Instance that is under the
control of the Fellowship body, with oversight from the Root and
Treasurer origins. Here's how it is governed:
- the Root origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
proposals, with no amount limit for approvals.
- the Treasurer origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
proposals, with approval limits of up to 10,000,000 DOT.
- Voice of all Fellows ranked at 3 or above can reject or approve spend
proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000 DOT.
- Voice of Fellows ranked at 4 or above can also reject or approve spend
proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000,000 DOT.
Additionally, we introduce the Asset Rate Pallet Instance to establish
conversion rates from asset A to B. This is used to determine if a
proposed spend amount involving a non-native asset is permissible by the
commanding origin. The rates can be set up by the Root, Treasurer
origins, or Voice of all Fellows.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <joe@parity.io>
Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2319
Changes:
- Ensure that only `enqueue_message(s)` is callable from within the
message processor. This prevents messed up storage that can currently
happen when the pallet is called into recursively.
- Use `H256` instead of `[u8; 32]` for clearer API.
## Details
The re-entracy check is done with the `environmental` crate by adding a
`with_service_mutex(f)` function that runs the closure exclusively. This
works since the MQ pallet is not instantiable.
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
# Description
- What does this PR do? Allows to generate JSON schema for subset of XCM
in std builds
- Why are these changes needed? To support XCM messages in CosmWasm
contracts which require Schemars to generate contract clients
- How were these changes implemented and what do they affect? We will
use schema feature flag to build XCM pallet with JSON schema enabled
# Checklist
- [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the
"Description" section above
- [x] My PR follows the [labeling requirements](CONTRIBUTING.md#Process)
of this project (at minimum one label for `T`
required)
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if
applicable)
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works (if applicable)
- [x] If this PR alters any external APIs or interfaces used by
Polkadot, the corresponding Polkadot PR is ready as well
as the corresponding Cumulus PR (optional)
As suggested in this thread:
https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/87#discussion_r1400237122
We already have the `IsChildSystemParachain`, which may be used at relay
chain, but it can't be used at a parachain level. So let's use
`AllSiblingSystemParachains` for that. I was thinking about
`AllSystemParachains`, but it may cause wrong impression that it can be
used at a relay chain level.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
# Motivation (+testing)
### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm`
We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
needing to teleport some non-fee asset?
This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
user.
This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
(the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
between said parachain and AssetHub).
Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.
# Description
Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
transfers for all `assets` including fees.
Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
`assets` including fees.
For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.
`assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
be teleportable to `dest`.
No limitations imposed on `fees`.
- for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
`beneficiary`.
- for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
## Review notes
Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Bumps [proc-macro-crate](https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate) from
1.3.1 to 2.0.0.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/releases">proc-macro-crate's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v2.0.0</h2>
<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Release 2.0.0 by <a
href="https://github.com/bkchr"><code>@bkchr</code></a> in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/pull/39">bkchr/proc-macro-crate#39</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a
href="https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/compare/v1.3.1...v2.0.0">https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/compare/v1.3.1...v2.0.0</a></p>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/commit/cc100ed2bc1ac9bb81812fd435a43e2ef023f355"><code>cc100ed</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/issues/39">#39</a>
from bkchr/bkchr-2.0.0</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/commit/39a7c1844fc4d73ef397a7e8d9419f1f3381aa44"><code>39a7c18</code></a>
Release 2.0.0</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/compare/v1.3.1...v2.0.0">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name> major version` will close this
group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific
dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific
dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name> minor version` will close this
group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific
dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific
dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name>` will close this group update PR
and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency
(unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot unignore <dependency name>` will remove all of the ignore
conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot unignore <dependency name> <ignore condition>` will
remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore
conditions
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and
adds CI to keep them tidy.
If people want we can customise the format rules as described here
https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html
@ggwpez, I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are
propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and
conflicts.
TODO
- [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet
tests instead of deleting the dir
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
In gossip-support, we shuffled the list of authorities using the
`rand::seq::SliceRandom::shuffle`. This function's behavior is
unspecified beyond being `O(n)` and could change in the future, leading
to network issues between nodes using different shuffling algorithms. In
practice, the implementation was a Fisher-Yates shuffle. This PR
replaces the call with a re-implementation of Fisher-Yates and adds a
test to ensure the behavior is the same between the two at the moment.
Follow up to fix a bug from #1814 discovered in XCM emulator testing.
I mistakenly thought that checking out an asset would withdraw it from
the sender. This actually withdraws the asset before checking out.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Good day,
This PR requests the inclusion of two bootnode entries for Polkadot,
Kusama and Westend as part of LuckyFriday's IBP application. The nodes
are hosted on self-owned hardware in a co-located facility. We've
undertaken connectivity tests ourselves and also from members of the
IBP.
The test commands used are as follows:
```
polkadot --chain westend --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-westend.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30334/wss/p2p/12D3KooWDg1YEytdwFFNWroFj6gio4YFsMB3miSbHKgdpJteUMB9" --no-hardware-benchmarks
polkadot --chain westend --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-westend.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooWDg1YEytdwFFNWroFj6gio4YFsMB3miSbHKgdpJteUMB9" --no-hardware-benchmarks
polkadot --chain kusama --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-kusama.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30334/wss/p2p/12D3KooW9vu1GWHBuxyhm7rZgD3fhGZpNajPXFexadvhujWMgwfT" --no-hardware-benchmarks
polkadot --chain kusama --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-kusama.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooW9vu1GWHBuxyhm7rZgD3fhGZpNajPXFexadvhujWMgwfT" --no-hardware-benchmarks
polkadot --chain polkadot --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-polkadot.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30334/wss/p2p/12D3KooWEjk6QXrZJ26fLpaajisJGHiz6WiQsR8k7mkM9GmWKnRZ" --no-hardware-benchmarks
polkadot --chain polkadot --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-polkadot.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooWEjk6QXrZJ26fLpaajisJGHiz6WiQsR8k7mkM9GmWKnRZ" --no-hardware-benchmarks
```
All tests yielded syncing with 1 peer, a positive result. We have also
backed up our node-key in the event that restoration is required.
I hope that the aforementioned meets the requirement for inclusion and
look forward to a speedy turnaround.
Kind Regards,
Will | Paradox
This commit introduces a new concept called `NotificationService` which
allows Polkadot protocols to communicate with the underlying
notification protocol implementation directly, without routing events
through `NetworkWorker`. This implies that each protocol has its own
service which it uses to communicate with remote peers and that each
`NotificationService` is unique with respect to the underlying
notification protocol, meaning `NotificationService` for the transaction
protocol can only be used to send and receive transaction-related
notifications.
The `NotificationService` concept introduces two additional benefits:
* allow protocols to start using custom handshakes
* allow protocols to accept/reject inbound peers
Previously the validation of inbound connections was solely the
responsibility of `ProtocolController`. This caused issues with light
peers and `SyncingEngine` as `ProtocolController` would accept more
peers than `SyncingEngine` could accept which caused peers to have
differing views of their own states. `SyncingEngine` would reject excess
peers but these rejections were not properly communicated to those peers
causing them to assume that they were accepted.
With `NotificationService`, the local handshake is not sent to remote
peer if peer is rejected which allows it to detect that it was rejected.
This commit also deprecates the use of `NetworkEventStream` for all
notification-related events and going forward only DHT events are
provided through `NetworkEventStream`. If protocols wish to follow each
other's events, they must introduce additional abtractions, as is done
for GRANDPA and transactions protocols by following the syncing protocol
through `SyncEventStream`.
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/512
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/514
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/515
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/554
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/556
---
These changes are transferred from
https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14197 but there are no
functional changes compared to that PR
---------
Co-authored-by: Dmitry Markin <dmitry@markin.tech>
Co-authored-by: Alexandru Vasile <60601340+lexnv@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently the polkadot node will backoff from block authoring if
finality starts lagging. This PR disables this mechanism on production
networks (polkadot and kusama) and adds a flags to optionally force
enabling it.
We're going to bridge Polkadot Bridge Hub with [Polkadot Bulletin
chain](https://github.com/zdave-parity/polkadot-bulletin-chain) soon
(and Rococo Bridge Hub with 1:1 copy of Polkadot Bulletin chain even
sooner), so we need a variant for that chain in `NetworkId`. As
suggested, I'm adding a new variant for it to the `NetworkId` (we may
have used `ByGenesis(_)`, but decision was made to have a dedicated
variant for that).
Addresses #409.
This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability
for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission
claiming:
> Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for
claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless?
This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends
`do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the
`Commission` struct, configured by an enum:
```
enum CommissionClaimPermission {
Permissionless,
Account(AccountId),
}
```
This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's
`commission.claim_permission` field:
```
struct BondedPool {
commission: {
<snip>
claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>,
},
<snip>
}
```
This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing
pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root`
role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is
the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None`
again.
#### Changes
- [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field.
- [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`.
- [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call.
- [x] Test to cover new configs and call.
- [x] Add and amend benchmarks.
- [x] Generate new weights + slot into call
`set_commission_claim_permission`.
- [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump
storage version.
- [x] Update Westend weights.
- [x] Migration working.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Our executor currently only supports the WASM MVP feature set, however
nowadays when compiling WASM the Rust compiler has more features enabled
by default.
We do set the `-C target-cpu=mvp` flag to make sure that *our* code gets
compiled in a way that is compatible with our executor, however this
doesn't affect Rust's standard library crates (`std`, `core` and
`alloc`) which are by default precompiled and still can make use of
these extra features.
So in this PR we force the compiler to also compile the standard library
crates for us to make sure that they also only use the MVP features.
I've added the `WASM_BUILD_STD` environment variable which can be used
to disable this behavior if set to `0`.
Unfortunately this *will* slow down the compile times when building
runtimes, but there isn't much that we can do about that.
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1755
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
**Overview:**
Adding an extra malus variant focusing on disputing finalized blocks. It
will:
- wrap around approval-voting
- listen to `OverseerSignal::BlockFinalized` and when encountered start
a dispute for the `dispute_offset`th ancestor
- simply pass through all other messages and signals
Add zombienet tests testing various edgecases:
- disputing freshly finalized blocks
- disputing stale finalized blocks
- disputing eagerly pruned finalized blocks (might be separate PR)
**TODO:**
- [x] Register new malus variant
- [x] Simple pass through wrapper (approval-voting)
- [x] Simple network definition
- [x] Listen to block finalizations
- [x] Fetch ancestor hash
- [x] Fetch session index
- [x] Fetch candidate
- [x] Construct and send dispute message
- [x] zndsl test 1 checking that disputes on fresh finalizations resolve
valid Closes#1365
- [x] zndsl test 2 checking that disputes for too old finalized blocks
are not possible Closes#1364
- [ ] zndsl test 3 checking that disputes for candidates with eagerly
pruned relay parent state are handled correctly #1359 (deferred to a
separate PR)
- [x] Unit tests for new malus variant (testing cli etc)
- [x] Clean/streamline error handling
- [ ] ~~Ensure it tests properly on session boundaries~~
---------
Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <javier@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <marcin@realemail.net>
Co-authored-by: Tsvetomir Dimitrov <tsvetomir@parity.io>
## Overview
This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent
changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142)
made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes.
It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`.
## Details
During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the
`spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on
version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`.
With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number
(still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as
`01_02_003`.
This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the
fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Egor_P