This MR contains two major changes and some maintenance cleanup.
## 1. Free Standing Pallet Benchmark Runner
Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3045, depends
on your runtime exposing the `GenesisBuilderApi` (like
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1492).
Introduces a new binary crate: `frame-omni-bencher`.
It allows to directly benchmark a WASM blob - without needing a node or
chain spec.
This makes it much easier to generate pallet weights and should allow us
to remove bloaty code from the node.
It should work for all FRAME runtimes that dont use 3rd party host calls
or non `BlakeTwo256` block hashing (basically all polkadot parachains
should work).
It is 100% backwards compatible with the old CLI args, when the `v1`
compatibility command is used. This is done to allow for forwards
compatible addition of new commands.
### Example (full example in the Rust docs)
Installing the CLI:
```sh
cargo install --locked --path substrate/utils/frame/omni-bencher
frame-omni-bencher --help
```
Building the Westend runtime:
```sh
cargo build -p westend-runtime --release --features runtime-benchmarks
```
Benchmarking the runtime:
```sh
frame-omni-bencher v1 benchmark pallet --runtime target/release/wbuild/westend-runtime/westend_runtime.compact.compressed.wasm --all
```
## 2. Building the Benchmark Genesis State in the Runtime
Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2664
This adds `--runtime` and `--genesis-builder=none|runtime|spec`
arguments to the `benchmark pallet` command to make it possible to
generate the genesis storage by the runtime. This can be used with both
the node and the freestanding benchmark runners. It utilizes the new
`GenesisBuilder` RA and depends on having
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3412 deployed.
## 3. Simpler args for `PalletCmd::run`
You can do three things here to integrate the changes into your node:
- nothing: old code keeps working as before but emits a deprecated
warning
- delete: remove the pallet benchmarking code from your node and use the
omni-bencher instead
- patch: apply the patch below and keep using as currently. This emits a
deprecated warning at runtime, since it uses the old way to generate a
genesis state, but is the smallest change.
```patch
runner.sync_run(|config| cmd
- .run::<HashingFor<Block>, ReclaimHostFunctions>(config)
+ .run_with_spec::<HashingFor<Block>, ReclaimHostFunctions>(Some(config.chain_spec))
)
```
## 4. Maintenance Change
- `pallet-nis` get a `BenchmarkSetup` config item to prepare its
counterparty asset.
- Add percent progress print when running benchmarks.
- Dont immediately exit on benchmark error but try to run as many as
possible and print errors last.
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Use of `- >` instead of `- |` workarounds GitLab quirk when it crops
collapsed multiline `script:` section commands in its CI job logs.
This PR also fixes `- |` based `script:` steps to behave properly after
`- >` conversion.
Resolves https://github.com/paritytech/ci_cd/issues/972.
**Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.
**This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
repository.**
Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:
- `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`
- `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`
- `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
tracing`
Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
commits for easier reviewing:
- `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'children'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'until'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'indices'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'committed'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'topology'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'response'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'network'`
Let me know if this structure is adequate.
**Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`,
`Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it
as it is.
~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to
message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left
it as it is.~~
~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the
more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~
~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the
correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~
**Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs
`judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc.
are both present in different places, but I suppose that's
understandable given the number of contributors.
~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it
triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it
is.~~
Adds availability-write regression tests.
The results for the `availability-distribution` subsystem are volatile,
so I had to reduce the precision of the test.
The first step towards
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3155
Brings all templates under the following structure
```
templates
| parachain
| | polkadot-launch
| | runtime --> parachain-template-runtime
| | pallets --> pallet-parachain-template
| | node --> parachain-template-node
| minimal
| | runtime --> minimal-template-runtime
| | pallets --> pallet-minimal-template
| | node --> minimal-template-node
| solochain
| | runtime --> solochain-template-runtime
| | pallets --> pallet-template (the naming is not consistent here)
| | node --> solochain-template-node
```
The only note-worthy changes in this PR are:
- More `Cargo.toml` fields are forwarded to use the one from the
workspace.
- parachain template now has weights and benchmarks
- adds a shell pallet to the minimal template
- remove a few unused deps
A list of possible follow-ups:
- [ ] Unify READMEs, create a parent README for all
- [ ] remove references to `docs.substrate.io` in templates
- [ ] make all templates use `#[derive_impl]`
- [ ] update and unify all licenses
- [ ] Remove polkadot launch, use
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/35349df993ea2e7c4769914ef5d199e787b23d4c/cumulus/zombienet/examples/small_network.toml
instead.
### What's been done
- `subsystem-bench` has been split into two parts: a cli benchmark
runner and a library.
- The cli runner is quite simple. It just allows us to run `.yaml` based
test sequences. Now it should only be used to run benchmarks during
development.
- The library is used in the cli runner and in regression tests. Some
code is changed to make the library independent of the runner.
- Added first regression tests for availability read and write that
replicate existing test sequences.
### How we run regression tests
- Regression tests are simply rust integration tests without the
harnesses.
- They should only be compiled under the `subsystem-benchmarks` feature
to prevent them from running with other tests.
- This doesn't work when running tests with `nextest` in CI, so
additional filters have been added to the `nextest` runs.
- Each benchmark run takes a different time in the beginning, so we
"warm up" the tests until their CPU usage differs by only 1%.
- After the warm-up, we run the benchmarks a few more times and compare
the average with the exception using a precision.
### What is still wrong?
- I haven't managed to set up approval voting tests. The spread of their
results is too large and can't be narrowed down in a reasonable amount
of time in the warm-up phase.
- The tests start an unconfigurable prometheus endpoint inside, which
causes errors because they use the same 9999 port. I disable it with a
flag, but I think it's better to extract the endpoint launching outside
the test, as we already do with `valgrind` and `pyroscope`. But we still
use `prometheus` inside the tests.
### Future work
* https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3528
* https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3529
* https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3530
* https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3531
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Samusev <41779041+alvicsam@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3144
Builds on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3229
### Summary
Some preparations for Runtime to support elastic scaling, guarded by
config node features bit `FeatureIndex::ElasticScalingMVP`. This PR
introduces a per-candidate `CoreIndex` but does it in a hacky way to
avoid changing `CandidateCommitments`, `CandidateReceipts` primitives
and networking protocols.
#### Including `CoreIndex` in `BackedCandidate`
If the `ElasticScalingMVP` feature bit is enabled then
`BackedCandidate::validator_indices` is extended by 8 bits.
The value stored in these bits represents the assumed core index for the
candidate.
It is temporary solution which works by creating a mapping from
`BackedCandidate` to `CoreIndex` by assuming the `CoreIndex` can be
discovered by checking in which validator group the validator that
signed the statement is.
TODO:
- [x] fix tests
- [x] add new tests
- [x] Bump runtime API for Kusama, so we have that node features thing!
-> https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/194
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: alindima <alin@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: alindima <alin@parity.io>
# Runtime side for PoV Reclaim
## Implementation Overview
- Hostfunction to fetch the storage proof size has been added to the
PVF. It uses the size tracking recorder that was introduced in my
previous PR.
- Mechanisms to use the reclaim HostFunction have been introduced.
- 1. A SignedExtension that checks the node-reported proof size before
and after application of an extrinsic. Then it reclaims the difference.
- 2. A manual helper to make reclaiming easier when manual interaction
is required, for example in `on_idle` or other hooks.
- In order to utilize the manual reclaiming, I modified `WeightMeter` to
support the reduction of consumed weight, at least for storage proof
size.
## How to use
To enable the general functionality for a parachain:
1. Add the SignedExtension to your parachain runtime.
2. Provide the HostFunction to the node
3. Enable proof recording during block import
## TODO
- [x] PRDoc
---------
Co-authored-by: Dmitry Markin <dmitry@markin.tech>
Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <davxy@datawok.net>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
The rationale behind this, is that it may be useful for some users
actually disable RPC batch requests or limit them by length instead of
the total size bytes of the batch.
This PR adds two new CLI options:
```
--rpc-disable-batch-requests - disable batch requests on the server
--rpc-max-batch-request-len <LEN> - limit batches to LEN on the server.
```
Add [forklift
caching](https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/infrastructure/ci_cd/forklift/forklift)
to remainig jobs
by .sh and .py scripts:
- cargo-check-each-crate x6 (`.gitlab/check-each-crate.py`)
- build-linux-stable (`polkadot/scripts/build-only-wasm.sh`)
by before_script:
- build-linux-substrate
- build-subkey-linux (with `.build-subkey` job)
- cargo-check-benches x2
**To disable feature set FORKLIFT_BYPASS variable to true in [project
settings in
gitlab](https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/settings/ci_cd)**
(forklift now handles FORKLIFT_BYPASS by itself)
This PR improves compatibility with RISC-V and PolkaVM, allowing more
runtimes to successfully compile.
In particular, it makes the following changes:
- The `sp-mmr-primitives` and `sp-consensus-beefy` crates
unconditionally required an `std`-only dependency; now they only require
those dependencies when the `std` feature is actually enabled. (Our
RISC-V target is, unlike WASM, a true `no_std` target where you can't
accidentally use stuff from `std` anymore.)
- One of our dependencies (the `bitvec` trace) uses a crate called
`radium` which doesn't compile under RISC-V due to incomplete
autodetection logic in their `build.rs` file. The good news is that this
is already fixed in the newest upstream version of `radium`, and the
newest version of `bitvec` uses it. The bad news is that the newest
version of `bitvec` is not currently released on crates.io, so we can't
use it. I've [created an
issue](https://github.com/ferrilab/ferrilab/issues/5) asking for a new
release, but in the meantime I forked the currently used `radium` 0.7,
[fixed the faulty
logic](https://github.com/paritytech/radium-0.7-fork/commit/ed66c8a294b138c67f93499644051d97d4c7fbda)
and used cargo's patching capabilities to use it for the RISC-V runtime
builds. This might be a little hacky, but it is the least intrusive way
to fix the problem, doesn't affect WASM builds at all, and we can
trivially remove it once a new `bitvec` is released.
- The new runtimes are added to the CI to make sure their compilation
doesn't break.
This PR adds initial support for building RISC-V runtimes targeting
PolkaVM.
- Setting the `SUBSTRATE_RUNTIME_TARGET=riscv` environment variable will
now build a RISC-V runtime instead of a WASM runtime.
- This only adds support for *building* runtimes; running them will need
a PolkaVM-based executor, which I will add in a future PR.
- Only building the minimal runtime is supported (building the Polkadot
runtime doesn't work *yet* due to one of the dependencies).
- The builder now sets a `substrate_runtime` cfg flag when building the
runtimes, with the idea being that instead of doing `#[cfg(not(feature =
"std"))]` or `#[cfg(target_arch = "wasm32")]` to detect that we're
building a runtime you'll do `#[cfg(substrate_runtime)]`. (Switching the
whole codebase to use this will be done in a future PR; I deliberately
didn't do this here to keep this PR minimal and reviewable.)
- Further renaming of things (e.g. types, environment variables and proc
macro attributes having "wasm" in their name) to be target-agnostic will
also be done in a future refactoring PR (while keeping backwards
compatibility where it makes sense; I don't intend to break anyone's
workflow or create unnecessary churn).
- This PR also fixes two bugs in the `wasm-builder` crate:
* The `RUSTC` environment variable is now removed when invoking the
compiler. This prevents the toolchain version from being overridden when
called from a `build.rs` script.
* When parsing the `rustup toolchain list` output the `(default)` is now
properly stripped and not treated as part of the version.
- I've also added a minimal CI job that makes sure this doesn't break in
the future. (cc @paritytech/ci)
cc @athei
------
Also, just a fun little tidbit: quickly comparing the size of the built
runtimes it seems that the PolkaVM runtime is slightly smaller than the
WASM one. (`production` build, with the `names` section substracted from
the WASM's size to keep things fair, since for the PolkaVM runtime we're
currently stripping out everything)
- `.wasm`: 625505 bytes
- `.wasm` (after wasm-opt -O3): 563205 bytes
- `.wasm` (after wasm-opt -Os): 562987 bytes
- `.wasm` (after wasm-opt -Oz): 536852 bytes
- `.polkavm`: ~~580338 bytes~~ 550476 bytes (after enabling extra target
features; I'll add those in another PR once we have an executor working)
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
closes https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2796
This partially reverts the #2439 - there are some changes (unrelated to
CI) that we still want to keep. The reason of that removal is that with
async backing enabled for Rococo AH (and for other chains in the near
future), we see a lot of issues there (because we run `14` nodes +
additional standalone process within a same container and it causes a
lot of timeouts). There's no way known to me to fix it right now, so
we're removing those tests hopefully temporarily to keep CI green
Brridges zombienet tests are non-standard - zombienet currently missing
multiple relay chains support (see e.g.
https://github.com/paritytech/zombienet/pull/796), so we need to go live
with two relay networks, their parachains + custom test runner (which
e.g. doesn't shutdown net when its tests are finished and instead waits
for both networks tests to complete). So we are stuck with native
zombienet provider => this PR is an attempt to gather everything in a
single docker container and run tests there ~Draft, because it is far
from finishing - what I want now is to see how it works on CI~
<del>PR custom review is deprecated. Now `review-bot` performs these
functions.</del>
PR removes unused ci jobs and adjusts zombienet jobs for merge queues
cc @Bullrich
Part of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2787
This is an initial PR that adds some basic BEEFY checks to the warp sync
zombienet tests. To be more specific, it does the following:
- Changes the snapshot used by the warp sync zombienet tests to one
built from an updated version of the kitchensink runtime, that supports
BEEFY
- Adds some basic BEEFY checks to the warp sync zombienet tests
- Deduplicates some params of the warp sync zombienet tests, making them
easier to extend
Closes#1591.
The purpose of this PR is filter out backing statements from the network
signed by disabled validators. This is just an optimization, since we
will do filtering in the runtime in #1863 to avoid nodes to filter
garbage out at block production time.
- [x] Ensure it's ok to fiddle with the mask of manifests
- [x] Write more unit tests
- [x] Test locally
- [x] simple zombienet test
- [x] PRDoc
---------
Co-authored-by: Tsvetomir Dimitrov <tsvetomir@parity.io>
Many clippy lints usually enforced by `-Dcomplexity` and `-Dcorrectness`
are not caught by CI as they are gated by `features`, like
`runtime-benchmarks`, while the clippy CI job runs with only the default
features for all targets.
This PR also adds a CI step to run clippy with `--all-features` to
ensure the code quality is maintained behind feature gates from now on.
To improve local development, clippy lints are downgraded to warnings,
but they still will result in an error at CI due to the `-Dwarnings`
rustflag.
---------
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
After GitLab update it started to remove artifacts from master if PR has
more than 20 commits. PR fixes this for `node-bench-regression-guard`
job
cc https://github.com/paritytech/ci_cd/issues/915
Remove old version for `cli_args`, since this was fixed in the latest
version of zombienet and the `latest` version of polkadot introduce the
new flag `--insecure-validator-i-know-what-i-do`.
Fix jobs like
https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4726174
Thx!
We currently use a bit of a hack in `.cargo/config` to make sure that
clippy isn't too annoying by specifying the list of lints.
There is now a stable way to define lints for a workspace. The only down
side is that every crate seems to have to opt into this so there's a
*few* files modified in this PR.
Dependencies:
- [x] PR that upgrades CI to use rust 1.74 is merged.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Initial implementation for the plan discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/701
Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178
v0: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7554,
## Overall idea
When approval-voting checks a candidate and is ready to advertise the
approval, defer it in a per-relay chain block until we either have
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT candidates to sign or a candidate has stayed
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS in the queue, in both cases we sign what
candidates we have available.
This should allow us to reduce the number of approvals messages we have
to create/send/verify. The parameters are configurable, so we should
find some values that balance:
- Security of the network: Delaying broadcasting of an approval
shouldn't but the finality at risk and to make sure that never happens
we won't delay sending a vote if we are past 2/3 from the no-show time.
- Scalability of the network: MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT = 1 &
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS =0, is what we have now and we know from
the measurements we did on versi, it bottlenecks
approval-distribution/approval-voting when increase significantly the
number of validators and parachains
- Block storage: In case of disputes we have to import this votes on
chain and that increase the necessary storage with
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT * CandidateHash per vote. Given that
disputes are not the normal way of the network functioning and we will
limit MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT in the single digits numbers, this
should be good enough. Alternatively, we could try to create a better
way to store this on-chain through indirection, if that's needed.
## Other fixes:
- Fixed the fact that we were sending random assignments to
non-validators, that was wrong because those won't do anything with it
and they won't gossip it either because they do not have a grid topology
set, so we would waste the random assignments.
- Added metrics to be able to debug potential no-shows and
mis-processing of approvals/assignments.
## TODO:
- [x] Get feedback, that this is moving in the right direction. @ordian
@sandreim @eskimor @burdges, let me know what you think.
- [x] More and more testing.
- [x] Test in versi.
- [x] Make MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT &
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_WAIT_MILLIS a parachain host configuration.
- [x] Make sure the backwards compatibility works correctly
- [x] Make sure this direction is compatible with other streams of work:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/635 &
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/742
- [x] Final versi burn-in before merging
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <alexandru.gheorghe@parity.io>
Oliver Tale-Yazdi