* Bump Substrate to rc4
* Add BaseCallFilter type
* Add DenyUnsafe to SystemApi extension
* Use new ServiceBuilder build functions
* Add BaseCallFilter to test runtimes
* Remove old comments
* Add `rev` and `git` fields back
Turns out that if you don't have these future release candidates will
be used if available. For instance, once `rc5` is released a fresh pull
would use that instead of `rc4` which is what we want.
* Use tag release instead of specific commit
Will make scripted updates easier in the future
* Add short script to update between `rc` versions
* Update scripts/update_rc.sh
Co-authored-by: Tomasz Drwięga <tomusdrw@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add skeleton for worst case import_unsigned_header
* Fix a typo
* Add benchmark test for best case unsigned header import
* Add finality verification to worst case bench
* Move `insert_header()` from mock to test_utils
Allows the benchmarking code to use this without having to pull it in from the mock.
* Add a rough bench to test a finalizing a "long" chain
* Try to use complexity parameter for finality bench
* Improve long finality bench
* Remove stray dot file
* Remove old "worst" case bench
* Scribble some ideas down for pruning bench
* Prune headers during benchmarking
* Clean up some comments
* Make finality bench work for entire range of complexity parameter
* Place initialization code into a function
* Add bench for block finalization with caching
* First attempt at bench with receipts
* Try and trigger validator set change
* Perform a validator set change during benchmarking
* Move `validators_change_receipt()` to shared location
Allows unit tests and benchmarks to access the same helper function
and const
* Extract a test receipt root into a constant
* Clean up description of pruning bench
* Fix cache and pruning tests
* Remove unecessary `build_custom_header` usage
* Get rid of warnings
* Remove code duplication comment
I don't think its entirely worth it to split out so few lines of code.
The benches aren't particularly hard to read anyways.
* Increase the range of the complexity parameter
* Use dynamic number of receipts while benchmarking
As part of this change we have removed the hardcoded TEST_RECEIPT_ROOT
and instead chose to calculate the receipt root on the fly. This will
make tests and benches less fragile.
* Prune a dynamic number of headers
* runtime benchmarks: start
* merge tests + benchmarks infrastructure
* fix compilation
* Fix compilation issues with runtime-benchmark feature flag
Mainly involved pulling in correct dependencies and adding some functions
which were called but didn't yet exist.
* Fix broken compilation for tests
* Move header signing methods into trait
* Move signing related test helpers to own module
* Remove comment about feature flag
* Add constants to tests
* Add top level comment for testing utilities
Co-authored-by: Hernando Castano <castano.ha@gmail.com>
* Update dependencies
Upgrades Substrate based dependencies from v2.0.0 -> v2.0.0-alpha.1
and uses the `jsonrpsee`'s new feature flags. The actual code hasn't
been updated though, so this won't compile.
* Use `RawClient`s from `jsonrpsee`
* Update to use jsonrpsee's new API
* Hook up Ethereum Bridge Runtime, Relay, and Node Runtime
* Bump `parity-crypto` from v0.4 to v0.6
Fixes error when trying to compile tests. This was caused by
`parity-crypto` v0.4's use of `parity-secp256k1` over `secp256k1'.
Using the Parity fork meant multiple version of the same underlying
C library were being pulled in. `parity-crypto` v0.6 moved away from
this, only relying on `secp256k1` thus fixing the issue.
* Copy node-template over from Substrate repo
Got the template at rev=6e6d06c33911
* Use dependencies from crates.io + stop renaming on import
* Remove template pallet
* Stop using crates.io dependencies
Instead they're going to be pinned at v2.0.0-alpha.2
at commit `2afecf81ee19b8a6edb364b419190ea47c4a4a31`
until something stable comes along.
* Remove LICENSE
* Change references of `node-template` to `bridge-node`
* Remove README
* Fix some missed node-template references
* Add WASM toolchain to CI
* Be more specific about nightly version to use
* Maybe don't tie to a specific nightly
* Use composite accounts
* Update to use lazy reaping
* Only use Development chain config
# Description
- What does this PR do?
1. Upgrades `trie-db`'s version to the latest release. This release
includes, among others, an implementation of `DoubleEndedIterator` for
the `TrieDB` struct, allowing to iterate both backwards and forwards
within the leaves of a trie.
2. Upgrades `trie-bench` to `0.39.0` for compatibility.
3. Upgrades `criterion` to `0.5.1` for compatibility.
- Why are these changes needed?
Besides keeping up with the upgrade of `trie-db`, this specifically adds
the functionality of iterating back on the leafs of a trie, with
`sp-trie`. In a project we're currently working on, this comes very
handy to verify a Merkle proof that is the response to a challenge. The
challenge is a random hash that (most likely) will not be an existing
leaf in the trie. So the challenged user, has to provide a Merkle proof
of the previous and next existing leafs in the trie, that surround the
random challenged hash.
Without having DoubleEnded iterators, we're forced to iterate until we
find the first existing leaf, like so:
```rust
// ************* VERIFIER (RUNTIME) *************
// Verify proof. This generates a partial trie based on the proof and
// checks that the root hash matches the `expected_root`.
let (memdb, root) = proof.to_memory_db(Some(&root)).unwrap();
let trie = TrieDBBuilder::<LayoutV1<RefHasher>>::new(&memdb, &root).build();
// Print all leaf node keys and values.
println!("\nPrinting leaf nodes of partial tree...");
for key in trie.key_iter().unwrap() {
if key.is_ok() {
println!("Leaf node key: {:?}", key.clone().unwrap());
let val = trie.get(&key.unwrap());
if val.is_ok() {
println!("Leaf node value: {:?}", val.unwrap());
} else {
println!("Leaf node value: None");
}
}
}
println!("RECONSTRUCTED TRIE {:#?}", trie);
// Create an iterator over the leaf nodes.
let mut iter = trie.iter().unwrap();
// First element with a value should be the previous existing leaf to the challenged hash.
let mut prev_key = None;
for element in &mut iter {
if element.is_ok() {
let (key, _) = element.unwrap();
prev_key = Some(key);
break;
}
}
assert!(prev_key.is_some());
// Since hashes are `Vec<u8>` ordered in big-endian, we can compare them directly.
assert!(prev_key.unwrap() <= challenge_hash.to_vec());
// The next element should exist (meaning there is no other existing leaf between the
// previous and next leaf) and it should be greater than the challenged hash.
let next_key = iter.next().unwrap().unwrap().0;
assert!(next_key >= challenge_hash.to_vec());
```
With DoubleEnded iterators, we can avoid that, like this:
```rust
// ************* VERIFIER (RUNTIME) *************
// Verify proof. This generates a partial trie based on the proof and
// checks that the root hash matches the `expected_root`.
let (memdb, root) = proof.to_memory_db(Some(&root)).unwrap();
let trie = TrieDBBuilder::<LayoutV1<RefHasher>>::new(&memdb, &root).build();
// Print all leaf node keys and values.
println!("\nPrinting leaf nodes of partial tree...");
for key in trie.key_iter().unwrap() {
if key.is_ok() {
println!("Leaf node key: {:?}", key.clone().unwrap());
let val = trie.get(&key.unwrap());
if val.is_ok() {
println!("Leaf node value: {:?}", val.unwrap());
} else {
println!("Leaf node value: None");
}
}
}
// println!("RECONSTRUCTED TRIE {:#?}", trie);
println!("\nChallenged key: {:?}", challenge_hash);
// Create an iterator over the leaf nodes.
let mut double_ended_iter = trie.into_double_ended_iter().unwrap();
// First element with a value should be the previous existing leaf to the challenged hash.
double_ended_iter.seek(&challenge_hash.to_vec()).unwrap();
let next_key = double_ended_iter.next_back().unwrap().unwrap().0;
let prev_key = double_ended_iter.next_back().unwrap().unwrap().0;
// Since hashes are `Vec<u8>` ordered in big-endian, we can compare them directly.
println!("Prev key: {:?}", prev_key);
assert!(prev_key <= challenge_hash.to_vec());
println!("Next key: {:?}", next_key);
assert!(next_key >= challenge_hash.to_vec());
```
- How were these changes implemented and what do they affect?
All that is needed for this functionality to be exposed is changing the
version number of `trie-db` in all the `Cargo.toml`s applicable, and
re-exporting some additional structs from `trie-db` in `sp-trie`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
**Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.
**This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
repository.**
Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:
- `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`
- `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`
- `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
tracing`
Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
commits for easier reviewing:
- `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'children'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'until'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'indices'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'committed'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'topology'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'response'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'network'`
Let me know if this structure is adequate.
**Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`,
`Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it
as it is.
~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to
message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left
it as it is.~~
~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the
more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~
~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the
correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~
**Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs
`judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc.
are both present in different places, but I suppose that's
understandable given the number of contributors.
~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it
triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it
is.~~
Related to
https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2538
This PR doesn't contain any functional changes.
The PR moves specific bridged chain definitions from
`bridges/primitives` to `bridges/chains` folder in order to facilitate
the migration of the `parity-bridges-repo` into `polkadot-sdk` as
discussed in https://hackmd.io/LprWjZ0bQXKpFeveYHIRXw?view
Apart from this it also includes some cosmetic changes to some
`Cargo.toml` files as a result of running `diener workspacify`.
Closes#2160
First part of [Extrinsic
Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415)
Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace
`SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the
runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data)
yet do not have hard-coded signatures.
Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for
transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned
transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned
which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and
__*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as
a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.)
Types of extrinsic are now therefore:
- Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as
"Unsigned")
- Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with
`ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of
`TransactionExtension` (deprecated).
- Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`.
- Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`.
- Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature).
- General transactions (without a hardcoded signature).
`TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because:
- A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present.
- It may alter the origin during validation.
- `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks
present in `validate`.
- `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a
`AccountId`.
- `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new
user-specifiable type `Val`.
- `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to
`Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and
passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This
facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto.
There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default
function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It
provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from
using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions
should now need to be called directly).
Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now
permissible:
- 0b000000100: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature
or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer
supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only.
- 0b100000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature and
Extra (extension data).
- 0b010000100: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra
(extension data), but no Signature.
For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors
to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g.
through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state,
mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the
above.
## Code Migration
### NOW: Getting it to build
Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be
accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new
terminology. E.g. Before:
```rust
/// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic.
pub type SignedExtra = (
/* snip */
MySpecialSignedExtension,
);
/// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime.
pub type UncheckedExtrinsic =
generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>;
```
After:
```rust
/// The extension to the basic transaction logic.
pub type TxExtension = (
/* snip */
AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>,
);
/// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime.
pub type UncheckedExtrinsic =
generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>;
```
You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a
`.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before:
```rust
fn construct_extrinsic(
/* snip */
) -> UncheckedExtrinsic {
let extra: SignedExtra = (
/* snip */
MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */),
);
let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap();
let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e));
UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed(
/* snip */
Signature::Sr25519(signature),
extra,
)
}
```
After:
```rust
fn construct_extrinsic(
/* snip */
) -> UncheckedExtrinsic {
let tx_ext: TxExtension = (
/* snip */
MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(),
);
let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap();
let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e));
UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed(
/* snip */
Signature::Sr25519(signature),
tx_ext,
)
}
```
### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension`
Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a
`TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know.
- Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now
implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and
`TransactionExtension`.
- Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn
weight`.
#### `TransactionExtensionBase`
This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types
specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`.
- `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to
`Implicit`/`implicit`.
- Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your
extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this
via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure.
#### `TransactionExtension`
Generally:
- `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the
`validate` functionality in there*!
- You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If
you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function
`AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`.
- You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This
defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is
important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to
`prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into
the latter. This is it.
- This trait takes two type parameters: `Call` and `Context`. `Call` is
the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just
move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. `Context` is not
currently used and you can safely implement over it as an unbounded
type.
- There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it.
Regarding `validate`:
- You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when
migrating from `SignedExtension`.
- `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is
the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If
you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and
on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can
pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the
`origin` argument.
Regarding `prepare`:
- This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change:
- FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM
`validate`!!
- (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the
same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.)
Regarding `post_dispatch`:
- Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by
`TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter
is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`.
If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or
`SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then:
- Just use the regular versions of these functions instead.
- Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`.
- Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction
rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all
`TransactionExtension`s' data.
- `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able
to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data,
however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon,
so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design.
## TODO
- [x] Introduce `CheckSignature` impl of `TransactionExtension` to
ensure it's possible to have crypto be done wholly in a
`TransactionExtension`.
- [x] Deprecate `SignedExtension` and move all uses in codebase to
`TransactionExtension`.
- [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment`
- [x] `DummyExtension`
- [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-tx-payment)
- [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-conversion-tx-payment)
- [x] `CheckWeight`
- [x] `CheckTxVersion`
- [x] `CheckSpecVersion`
- [x] `CheckNonce`
- [x] `CheckNonZeroSender`
- [x] `CheckMortality`
- [x] `CheckGenesis`
- [x] `CheckOnlySudoAccount`
- [x] `WatchDummy`
- [x] `PrevalidateAttests`
- [x] `GenericSignedExtension`
- [x] `SignedExtension` (chain-polkadot-bulletin)
- [x] `RefundSignedExtensionAdapter`
- [x] Implement `fn weight` across the board.
- [ ] Go through all pre-existing extensions which assume an account
signer and explicitly handle the possibility of another kind of origin.
- [x] `CheckNonce` should probably succeed in the case of a non-account
origin.
- [x] `CheckNonZeroSender` should succeed in the case of a non-account
origin.
- [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment` and family should fail in the case of a
non-account origin.
- [ ]
- [x] Fix any broken tests.
---------
Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <alexandru.vasile@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <alexandru.gheorghe@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Nikhil Gupta <17176722+gupnik@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <52418509+georgepisaltu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chevdor <chevdor@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Co-authored-by: Maciej <maciej.zyszkiewicz@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <javier@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <marcin@realemail.net>
Co-authored-by: Tsvetomir Dimitrov <tsvetomir@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Javier Bullrich <javier@bullrich.dev>
Co-authored-by: Koute <koute@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev <vladimir@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <ross@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <g6pestana@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <svyatonik@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: s0me0ne-unkn0wn <48632512+s0me0ne-unkn0wn@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ordian <write@reusable.software>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <skunert49@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaro Altonen <48052676+altonen@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dmitry Markin <dmitry@markin.tech>
Co-authored-by: Alexandru Vasile <60601340+lexnv@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Samusev <41779041+alvicsam@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Julian Eager <eagr@tutanota.com>
Co-authored-by: Michal Kucharczyk <1728078+michalkucharczyk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <davxy@datawok.net>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <donal.murray@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: yjh <yjh465402634@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tom Mi <tommi@niemi.lol>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io <79228812+paradox-tt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <info@kchr.de>
Co-authored-by: Joshy Orndorff <JoshOrndorff@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joshy Orndorff <git-user-email.h0ly5@simplelogin.com>
Co-authored-by: PG Herveou <pgherveou@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com>
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Juan Girini <juangirini@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: bader y <ibnbassem@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Wilson <james@jsdw.me>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: asynchronous rob <rphmeier@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Parth <desaiparth08@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Jones <ascjones@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Udd <jonathan@dwellir.com>
Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <serban@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Egor_P <egor@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Evgeny Snitko <evgeny@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Just van Stam <vstam1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: gupnik <nikhilgupta.iitk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dzmitry-lahoda <dzmitry@lahoda.pro>
Co-authored-by: zhiqiangxu <652732310@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Nazar Mokrynskyi <nazar@mokrynskyi.com>
Co-authored-by: Anwesh <anweshknayak@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: cheme <emericchevalier.pro@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sam Johnson <sam@durosoft.com>
Co-authored-by: kianenigma <kian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Jegor Sidorenko <5252494+jsidorenko@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muharem <ismailov.m.h@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <joe@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <49718502+alexggh@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Facco de Arruda <arrudagates@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Squirrel <gilescope@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Lifting some more dependencies to the workspace. Just using the
most-often updated ones for now.
It can be reproduced locally.
```sh
# First you can check if there would be semver incompatible bumps (looks good in this case):
$ zepter transpose dependency lift-to-workspace --ignore-errors syn quote thiserror "regex:^serde.*"
# Then apply the changes:
$ zepter transpose dependency lift-to-workspace --version-resolver=highest syn quote thiserror "regex:^serde.*" --fix
# And format the changes:
$ taplo format --config .config/taplo.toml
```
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Changes (partial https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/994):
- Set log to `0.4.20` everywhere
- Lift `log` to the workspace
Starting with a simpler one after seeing
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2065 from @jsdw.
This sets the `default-features` to `false` in the root and then
overwrites that in each create to its original value. This is necessary
since otherwise the `default` features are additive and its impossible
to disable them in the crate again once they are enabled in the
workspace.
I am using a tool to do this, so its mostly a test to see that it works
as expected.
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
## TODO
- [x] change constants when CI fails (should fail :) )
## Result
On the AssetHubRococo: 1701175800126 -> 1700929825257 = 0.15 %
decreased.
```
# Before ( [xcm] Fix `SovereignPaidRemoteExporter` and `DepositAsset` handling (#3157))
Feb 02 12:59:05.520 ERROR bridges::estimate: `bridging::XcmBridgeHubRouterBaseFee` actual value: 1701175800126 for runtime: statemine-1006000 (statemine-0.tx14.au1)
# After
Feb 02 13:02:40.647 ERROR bridges::estimate: `bridging::XcmBridgeHubRouterBaseFee` actual value: 1700929825257 for runtime: statemine-1006000 (statemine-0.tx14.au1)
```
On the AssetHubWestend: 2116038876326 -> 1641718372993 = 22.4 %
decreased.
```
# Before ( [xcm] Fix `SovereignPaidRemoteExporter` and `DepositAsset` handling (#3157))
Feb 02 12:56:00.880 ERROR bridges::estimate: `bridging::XcmBridgeHubRouterBaseFee` actual value: 2116038876326 for runtime: westmint-1006000 (westmint-0.tx14.au1)
# After
Feb 02 13:04:42.515 ERROR bridges::estimate: `bridging::XcmBridgeHubRouterBaseFee` actual value: 1641718372993 for runtime: westmint-1006000 (westmint-0.tx14.au1)
```
I think I broke it in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2139 - fees has
increased and amounts that we send are no longer enough to cover fees.
Also changed a consts (test + 33%) using latest weights.
---------
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
This PR adds [Rococo
People](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281) <> [Rococo
Bulletin](https://github.com/zdave-parity/polkadot-bulletin-chain) to
the Rococo Bridge Hub code. There's a couple of things left to do here:
- [x] add remaining tests - it'd need some refactoring in the
`bridge-hub-test-utils` - will do in a separate PR;
- [x] actually run benchmarks for new messaging pallet (do we have bot
nowadays?).
The reason why I'm opening it before this ^^^ is ready, is that I'd like
to hear others opinion on how to deal with hacks with that bridge.
Initially I was assuming that Rococo Bulletin will be the 1:1 copy of
the Polkadot Bulletin (to avoid maintaining multiple
runtimes/releases/...), so you can see many `PolkadotBulletin` mentions
in this PR, even though we are going to bridge with the parallel chain
(`RococoBulletin`). That's because e.g. pallet names from
`construct_runtime` are affecting runtime storage keys and bridges are
using runtime storage proofs => it is important to use names that the
Bulletin chain expects.
But in the end, this hack won't work - we can't use Polkadot Bulletin
runtime to bridge with Rococo Bridge Hub, because Polkadot Bulletin
expects Polkadot Bridge hub to use `1002` parachain id and Rococo Bridge
Hub seats on the `1013`. This also affects storage keys using in
bridging, so I had to add the [`rococo`
feature](https://github.com/svyatonik/polkadot-bulletin-chain/blob/add-bridge-pallets/runtime/Cargo.toml#L198)
to the Bulletin chain. So now we can actually alter its runtime and
adapt it for Rococo.
So the question here is - what's better for us here
- to leave everything as is (seems hacky and non-trivial);
- change Bulletin chain runtime when `rococo` feature is used - e.g. use
proper names there (`WithPolkadotGrandpa` -> `WithRococoGrandpa`, ...)
- add another set of pallets to the Bulletin chain runtime to bridge
with Rococo and never use them in production. Similar to hack that we
had in Rococo/Wococo
cc @acatangiu @bkontur @serban300
also cc @joepetrowski as the main "client" of this bridge
---
A couple words on how this bridge is different from the Rococo <>
Westend bridge:
- it is a bridge with a chain that uses GRANDPA finality, not the
parachain finality (hence the tests needs to be changed);
- it is a fee-free bridge. So
`AllowExplicitUnpaidExecutionFrom<Equals<SiblingPeople>>` + we are not
paying any rewards to relayers (apart from compensating transaction
costs).
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Egor_P <egor@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
We currently use a bit of a hack in `.cargo/config` to make sure that
clippy isn't too annoying by specifying the list of lints.
There is now a stable way to define lints for a workspace. The only down
side is that every crate seems to have to opt into this so there's a
*few* files modified in this PR.
Dependencies:
- [x] PR that upgrades CI to use rust 1.74 is merged.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and
adds CI to keep them tidy.
If people want we can customise the format rules as described here
https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html
@ggwpez, I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are
propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and
conflicts.
TODO
- [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet
tests instead of deleting the dir
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Right now governance could only control byte-fee component of Rococo <>
Westend message fees (paid at Asset Hubs). This PR changes it a bit:
1) governance now allowed to control both fee components - byte fee and
base fee;
2) base fee now includes cost of "default" delivery and confirmation
transactions, in addition to `ExportMessage` instruction cost.
## Summary
Asset bridging support for AssetHub**Rococo** <-> AssetHub**Wococo** was
added [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1215), so
now we aim to bridge AssetHub**Rococo** and AssetHub**Westend**. (And
perhaps retire AssetHubWococo and the Wococo chains).
## Solution
**bridge-hub-westend-runtime**
- added new runtime as a copy of `bridge-hub-rococo-runtime`
- added support for bridging to `BridgeHubRococo`
- added tests and benchmarks
**bridge-hub-rococo-runtime**
- added support for bridging to `BridgeHubWestend`
- added tests and benchmarks
- internal refactoring by splitting bridge configuration per network,
e.g., `bridge_to_whatevernetwork_config.rs`.
**asset-hub-rococo-runtime**
- added support for asset bridging to `AssetHubWestend` (allows to
receive only WNDs)
- added new xcm router for `Westend`
- added tests and benchmarks
**asset-hub-westend-runtime**
- added support for asset bridging to `AssetHubRococo` (allows to
receive only ROCs)
- added new xcm router for `Rococo`
- added tests and benchmarks
## Deployment
All changes will be deployed as a part of
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1988.
## TODO
- [x] benchmarks for all pallet instances
- [x] integration tests
- [x] local run scripts
Relates to:
https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2602
Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1988
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Changes:
- Change the fungible(s) logic to treat a self-transfer as No-OP (as
long as all pre-checks pass).
Note that the self-transfer case will not emit an event since no state
was changed.
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Adds a config file that allows to run `zepter` without any arguments in
the workspace to address all issues.
A secondary workflow for the CI is provided as `zepter run check`. Both
the formatting and linting are now in one check for efficiancy.
The latest version also detects some more things that `featalign` was
already showing.
Error message [in the
CI](https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/3916205)
now looks like this:
```pre
...
crate 'test-parachains' (/Users/vados/Documents/work/polkadot-sdk/polkadot/parachain/test-parachains/Cargo.toml)
feature 'std'
must propagate to:
parity-scale-codec
Found 55 issues (run with --fix to fix).
Error: Command 'lint propagate-feature' failed with exit code 1
Polkadot-SDK uses the Zepter CLI to detect abnormalities in the feature configuration.
It looks like one more more checks failed; please check the console output. You can try to automatically address them by running `zepter`.
Otherwise please ask directly in the Merge Request, GitHub Discussions or on Matrix Chat, thank you.
For more information, see:
- https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1831
- https://github.com/ggwpez/zepter
```
TODO:
- [x] Check that CI fails correctly
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Svyatoslav Nikolsky