When running `cargo test -p bridge-hub-rococo-runtime --features
runtime-benchmarks`, two of the Snowbridge benchmark tests fails. The
reason is that when the runtime-benchmarks feature is enabled, the
`NoopMessageProcessor` message processor is used. The Snowbridge tests
rely on the outbound messages to be processed using the message queue,
so that we can check the expected nonce and block digest logs.
This PR changes the conditional compilation to only use
`NoopMessageProcessor` when compiling the executable to run benchmarks
against, not when running tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: claravanstaden <Cats 4 life!>
## Problem
During the bumping of the `polkadot-fellows` repository to
`polkadot-sdk@1.6.0`, I encountered a situation where the benchmarks
`teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` in AssetHubKusama
started to fail. This issue arose due to a decreased ED balance for
AssetHubs introduced
[here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/158/files#diff-80668ff8e793b64f36a9a3ec512df5cbca4ad448c157a5d81abda1b15f35f1daR213),
and also because of a [missing CI
pipeline](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/issues/197) to
check the benchmarks, which went unnoticed.
These benchmarks expect the `caller` to have enough:
1. balance to transfer (BTT)
2. balance for paying delivery (BFPD).
So the initial balance was calculated as `ED * 100`, which seems
reasonable:
```
const ED_MULTIPLIER: u32 = 100;
let balance = existential_deposit.saturating_mul(ED_MULTIPLIER.into());`
```
The problem arises when the price for delivery is 100 times higher than
the existential deposit. In other words, when `ED * 100` does not cover
`BTT` + `BFPD`.
I check AHR/AHW/AHK/AHP and this problem has only AssetHubKusama
```
ED: 3333333
calculated price to parent delivery: 1031666634 (from xcm logs from the benchmark)
---
3333333 * 100 - BTT(3333333) - BFPD(1031666634) = −701666667
```
which results in the error;
```
2024-02-23 09:19:42 Unable to charge fee with error Module(ModuleError { index: 31, error: [17, 0, 0, 0], message: Some("FeesNotMet") })
Error: Input("Benchmark pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets failed: FeesNotMet")
```
## Solution
The benchmarks `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` were
fixed by removing `ED * 100` and replacing it with `DeliveryHelper`
logic, which calculates the (almost real) price for delivery and sets it
along with the existential deposit as the initial balance for the
account used in the benchmark.
## TODO
- [ ] patch for 1.6 -
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3466
- [ ] patch for 1.7 -
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3465
- [ ] patch for 1.8 - TODO: PR
---------
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
- Adds a test to check the correct digest for Snowbridge outbound
messages. For the correct digest to be in the block, the the
MessageQueue pallet should be configured after the EthereumOutbound
queue pallet. The added test fails if the EthereumOutbound is configured
after the MessageQueue pallet.
- Adds a helper method `run_to_block_with_finalize` to simulate the
block finalizing. The existing `run_to_block` method does not finalize
and so it cannot successfully test this condition.
Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3208
---------
Co-authored-by: claravanstaden <Cats 4 life!>
I found out during the cleanup of this deprecation message in the
`polkadot-fellows` repository that we deprecated `CurrencyAdapter`
without making the recommended changes.
## TODO
- [ ] fix `polkadot-fellows` bump to 1.6.0
https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/159
---------
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon question
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499).
## Problem
The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the
runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the
same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason.
It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently
large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the
integrity_test check becomes less useful.
**Situation for "any" runtime:**
- `HoldReason` enums from different pallets:
```rust
/// from pallet_nis
#[pallet::composite_enum]
pub enum HoldReason {
NftReceipt,
}
/// from pallet_preimage
#[pallet::composite_enum]
pub enum HoldReason {
Preimage,
}
// from pallet_state-trie-migration
#[pallet::composite_enum]
pub enum HoldReason {
SlashForContinueMigrate,
SlashForMigrateCustomTop,
SlashForMigrateCustomChild,
}
```
- generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like:
```rust
pub enum RuntimeHoldReason {
#[codec(index = 32u8)]
Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason),
#[codec(index = 38u8)]
Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason),
#[codec(index = 42u8)]
StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason),
}
```
- composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3`
- we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>`
- `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3)
However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some
functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct
hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more),
and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`,
which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`:
```
// pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these:
T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;
T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;
T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;
// With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail
T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;
T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;
```
## Solutions
A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount`
implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This
expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets'
`HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants
must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic
count.
The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and
`RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum
of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`:
```rust
#[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
mod module_single_instance {
#[pallet::composite_enum]
pub enum HoldReason {
ModuleSingleInstanceReason1,
ModuleSingleInstanceReason2,
}
...
}
#[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
mod module_multi_instance {
#[pallet::composite_enum]
pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> {
ModuleMultiInstanceReason1,
ModuleMultiInstanceReason2,
ModuleMultiInstanceReason3,
}
...
}
impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount
for RuntimeHoldReason
{
const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0
+ module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT
+ module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT
+ module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT
+ module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT;
}
```
In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573))
from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to
`RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let
the runtime specify `MaxHolds`.
## For reviewers
Relevant changes can be found here:
- `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs`
- `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs`
- `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs`
-
`substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs`
-
`substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs`
-
`substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs`
- `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs`
And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from
`pallet_balances`
## Next steps
Do the same for `MaxFreezes`
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <donal.murray@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: gupnik <nikhilgupta.iitk@gmail.com>
The `parachains-common` contains a lots of constants and type
definitions which are used for `polkadot-sdk`'s testnet runtimes and
also for `polkadot-fellows`'s production [SP
runtimes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/tree/main/system-parachains/constants).
This PR cleans `parachains-common` module to contain only common and
generic functionality.
Testnet-specific constants have been moved to the separate module
dedicated just for testnets:
`polkadot-sdk/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/constants/`
Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3054
---------
Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io>
Reverts paritytech/polkadot-sdk#2302. 🤦♂️ should have checked the
migration CI first.
We either need to reduce the `max_message_size` for the open HRMP
channels on the failing chains or increase the `PageSize` of the XCMP
queue.
Both would be fine on a test-net, but i assume this will also fail
before the next SP runtime upgrade so first need to think what best to
do.
AFAIK its not possible currently to change the `max_message_size` of an
open HRMP channel.
- Prepares for the Deneb hardfork on Sepolia testnet on 31 January
(needs to be deployed to Rococo before then)
- Removes `beacon-minimal-spec` flag for simpler config
- Adds test comments
---------
Co-authored-by: Ron <yrong1997@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: claravanstaden <Cats 4 life!>
Co-authored-by: Alistair Singh <alistair.singh7@gmail.com>
Remove `without_storage_info` from the XCMP queue pallet. Part of
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/323
Changes:
- Limit the number of channels that can be suspended at the same time.
- Limit the number of channels that can have messages or signals pending
at the same time.
A No-OP migration is put in place to ensure that all `BoundedVec`s still
decode and not truncate after upgrade. The storage version is thereby
bumped to 4 to have our tooling remind us to deploy that migration.
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
This PR backports version bumps from release branch
`release-polkadot-v1.6.0` back to `master` and also moved `prdoc` files
related to the release to the appropriate folder
# Note for reviewer
Most changes are just syntax changes necessary for the new version.
Most important files should be the ones under the `xcm` folder.
# Description
Added XCMv4.
## Removed `Multi` prefix
The following types have been renamed:
- MultiLocation -> Location
- MultiAsset -> Asset
- MultiAssets -> Assets
- InteriorMultiLocation -> InteriorLocation
- MultiAssetFilter -> AssetFilter
- VersionedMultiAsset -> VersionedAsset
- WildMultiAsset -> WildAsset
- VersionedMultiLocation -> VersionedLocation
In order to fix a name conflict, the `Assets` in `xcm-executor` were
renamed to `HoldingAssets`, as they represent assets in holding.
## Removed `Abstract` asset id
It was not being used anywhere and this simplifies the code.
Now assets are just constructed as follows:
```rust
let asset: Asset = (AssetId(Location::new(1, Here)), 100u128).into();
```
No need for specifying `Concrete` anymore.
## Outcome is now a named fields struct
Instead of
```rust
pub enum Outcome {
Complete(Weight),
Incomplete(Weight, Error),
Error(Error),
}
```
we now have
```rust
pub enum Outcome {
Complete { used: Weight },
Incomplete { used: Weight, error: Error },
Error { error: Error },
}
```
## Added Reanchorable trait
Now both locations and assets implement this trait, making it easier to
reanchor both.
## New syntax for building locations and junctions
Now junctions are built using the following methods:
```rust
let location = Location {
parents: 1,
interior: [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)].into()
};
```
or
```rust
let location = Location::new(1, [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)]);
```
And they are matched like so:
```rust
match location.unpack() {
(1, [Parachain(id)]) => ...
(0, Here) => ...,
(1, [_]) => ...,
}
```
This syntax is mandatory in v4, and has been also implemented for v2 and
v3 for easier migration.
This was needed to make all sizes smaller.
# TODO
- [x] Scaffold v4
- [x] Port github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7236
- [x] Remove `Multi` prefix
- [x] Remove `Abstract` asset id
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <kungfukeith11@gmail.com>
- updates snowbridge crates to `0.9.0`
- updates Cargo.toml files in preparation for publishing to crates.io
- adds Kusama and Polkadot Snowbridge runtime config crates
- moves runtime tests from the Snowbridge subtree into the bridge hub
tests dir
---------
Co-authored-by: claravanstaden <Cats 4 life!>
Co-authored-by: Ron <yrong1997@gmail.com>
- Includes the introduction of the `fast-runtime` feature, which cleans
up our features
- Updates beacon client fork versions config to Sepolia's versions
- Cleanup of AgentIdOf
---------
Co-authored-by: Ron <yrong1997@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: claravanstaden <Cats 4 life!>
- Updates all safe call filters to allow `system::authorize_upgrade`.
- Updates Coretime safe call filter to allow `sudo` and
`system_set_storage`.
- Update Coretime teleports to allow teleportation with other system
chains.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <info@kchr.de>
Adds the `authorize_upgrade` -> `enact_authorized_upgrade` pattern to
`frame-system`. This will be useful for upgrading bridged chains that
are under the governance of Polkadot without passing entire runtime Wasm
blobs over a bridge.
Notes:
- Changed `enact_authorized_upgrade` to `apply_authorized_upgrade`.
Personal opinion, "apply" more accurately expresses what it's doing. Can
change back if outvoted.
- Remove `check_version` in favor of two extrinsics, so as to make
_checked_ the default.
- Left calls in `parachain-system` and marked as deprecated to prevent
breaking the API. They just call into the `frame-system` functions.
- Updated `frame-system` benchmarks to v2 syntax.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
This PR adds possibility for relay chain governance to halt and resume
bridge pallets using XCM calls. Following calls are enabled over XCM for
the `root` origin: `pallet_bridge_grandpa::set_operating_mode`,
`pallet_bridge_parachains::set_operating_mode` and
`pallet_bridge_messages::set_operating_mode`.
This PR adds [Rococo
People](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281) <> [Rococo
Bulletin](https://github.com/zdave-parity/polkadot-bulletin-chain) to
the Rococo Bridge Hub code. There's a couple of things left to do here:
- [x] add remaining tests - it'd need some refactoring in the
`bridge-hub-test-utils` - will do in a separate PR;
- [x] actually run benchmarks for new messaging pallet (do we have bot
nowadays?).
The reason why I'm opening it before this ^^^ is ready, is that I'd like
to hear others opinion on how to deal with hacks with that bridge.
Initially I was assuming that Rococo Bulletin will be the 1:1 copy of
the Polkadot Bulletin (to avoid maintaining multiple
runtimes/releases/...), so you can see many `PolkadotBulletin` mentions
in this PR, even though we are going to bridge with the parallel chain
(`RococoBulletin`). That's because e.g. pallet names from
`construct_runtime` are affecting runtime storage keys and bridges are
using runtime storage proofs => it is important to use names that the
Bulletin chain expects.
But in the end, this hack won't work - we can't use Polkadot Bulletin
runtime to bridge with Rococo Bridge Hub, because Polkadot Bulletin
expects Polkadot Bridge hub to use `1002` parachain id and Rococo Bridge
Hub seats on the `1013`. This also affects storage keys using in
bridging, so I had to add the [`rococo`
feature](https://github.com/svyatonik/polkadot-bulletin-chain/blob/add-bridge-pallets/runtime/Cargo.toml#L198)
to the Bulletin chain. So now we can actually alter its runtime and
adapt it for Rococo.
So the question here is - what's better for us here
- to leave everything as is (seems hacky and non-trivial);
- change Bulletin chain runtime when `rococo` feature is used - e.g. use
proper names there (`WithPolkadotGrandpa` -> `WithRococoGrandpa`, ...)
- add another set of pallets to the Bulletin chain runtime to bridge
with Rococo and never use them in production. Similar to hack that we
had in Rococo/Wococo
cc @acatangiu @bkontur @serban300
also cc @joepetrowski as the main "client" of this bridge
---
A couple words on how this bridge is different from the Rococo <>
Westend bridge:
- it is a bridge with a chain that uses GRANDPA finality, not the
parachain finality (hence the tests needs to be changed);
- it is a fee-free bridge. So
`AllowExplicitUnpaidExecutionFrom<Equals<SiblingPeople>>` + we are not
paying any rewards to relayers (apart from compensating transaction
costs).
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Egor_P <egor@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
In the move from the old `Currency` traits to the new `fungible/s`
family of traits, we already had the `FungiblesAdapter` and
`NonFungiblesAdapter` for multiple fungible and non fungible assets
respectively. However, for handling only one fungible asset, we were
missing a `FungibleAdapter`, and so used the old `CurrencyAdapter`
instead. This PR aims to fill in that gap, and provide the new adapter
for more updated examples.
I marked the old `CurrencyAdapter` as deprecated as part of this PR, and
I'll change it to the new `FungibleAdapter` in a following PR.
The two stages are separated so as to not bloat this PR with some name
fixes in tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
We were not filtering for sibling parachains, but for sibling anything
---------
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
## Summary
This pull request proposes a solution for improved control of the
versioned XCM flow over the bridge (across different consensus chains)
and resolves the situation where the sending chain/consensus has already
migrated to a higher XCM version than the receiving chain/consensus.
## Problem/Motivation
The current flow over the bridge involves a transfer from AssetHubRococo
(AHR) to BridgeHubRococo (BHR) to BridgeHubWestend (BHW) and finally to
AssetHubWestend (AHW), beginning with a reserve-backed transfer on AHR.
In this process:
1. AHR sends XCM `ExportMessage` through `XcmpQueue`, incorporating XCM
version checks using the `WrapVersion` feature, influenced by
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion` (managed by
`pallet_xcm::force_xcm_version` or version discovery).
2. BHR handles the `ExportMessage` instruction, utilizing the latest XCM
version. The `HaulBlobExporter` converts the inner XCM to
[`VersionedXcm::from`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/63ac2471aa0210f0ac9903bdd7d8f9351f9a635f/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465-L467),
also using the latest XCM version.
However, challenges arise:
- Incompatibility when BHW uses a different version than BHR. For
instance, if BHR migrates to **XCMv4** while BHW remains on **XCMv3**,
BHR's `VersionedXcm::from` uses `VersionedXcm::V4` variant, causing
encoding issues for BHW.
```
/// Just a simulation of possible error, which could happen on BHW
/// (this code is based on actual master without XCMv4)
let encoded = hex_literal::hex!("0400");
println!("{:?}", VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(&mut &encoded[..]));
Err(Error { cause: None, desc: "Could not decode `VersionedXcm`, variant
doesn't exist" })
```
- Similar compatibility issues exist between AHR and AHW.
## Solution
This pull request introduces the following solutions:
1. **New trait `CheckVersion`** - added to the `xcm` module and exposing
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`. This enhancement allows checking the
actual XCM version for desired destinations outside of the `pallet_xcm`
module.
2. **Version Check in `HaulBlobExporter`** uses `CheckVersion` to check
known/configured destination versions, ensuring compatibility. For
example, in the scenario mentioned, BHR can store the version `3` for
BHW. If BHR is on XCMv4, it will attempt to downgrade the message to
version `3` instead of using the latest version `4`.
3. **Version Check in `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`** - this check
ensures compatibility with the real destination's XCM version,
preventing the unnecessary sending of messages to the local bridge hub
if versions are incompatible.
These additions aim to improve the control and compatibility of XCM
flows over the bridge and addressing issues related to version
mismatches.
## Possible alternative solution
_(More investigation is needed, and at the very least, it should extend
to XCMv4/5. If this proves to be a viable option, I can open an RFC for
XCM.)._
Add the `XcmVersion` attribute to the `ExportMessage` so that the
sending chain can determine, based on what is stored in
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`, the version the destination is using.
This way, we may not need to handle the version in `HaulBlobExporter`.
```
ExportMessage {
network: NetworkId,
destination: InteriorMultiLocation,
xcm: Xcm<()>
destination_xcm_version: Version, // <- new attritbute
},
```
```
pub trait ExportXcm {
fn validate(
network: NetworkId,
channel: u32,
universal_source: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
destination: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
message: &mut Option<Xcm<()>>,
destination_xcm_version: Version, , // <- new attritbute
) -> SendResult<Self::Ticket>;
```
## Future Directions
This PR does not fix version discovery over bridge, further
investigation will be conducted here:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2417.
## TODO
- [x] `pallet_xcm` mock for tests uses hard-coded XCM version `2` -
change to 3 or lastest?
- [x] fix `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`
- [x] fix HaulBlobExporter with version determination
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/2183669d05f9b510f979a0cc3c7847707bacba2e/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465)
- [x] add unit-tests to the runtimes
- [x] run benchmarks for `ExportMessage`
- [x] extend local run scripts about `force_xcm_version(dest, version)`
- [ ] when merged, prepare governance calls for Rococo/Westend
- [ ] add PRDoc
Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2719
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved
in a release and build:
- the changelog
- a simple draft of audience documentation
Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version
1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file.
This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content
allowing to properly generate the changelog.
The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience
documentation.
The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when
all PR come with a proper `prdoc`.
## Assumptions
- the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under
`prdoc/X.Y.Z`
- the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author +
topic. Thos fields are optional.
The build script can be called as:
```
VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh
```
Related:
- #1408
---------
Co-authored-by: EgorPopelyaev <egor@parity.io>
As suggested in this thread:
https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/87#discussion_r1400237122
We already have the `IsChildSystemParachain`, which may be used at relay
chain, but it can't be used at a parachain level. So let's use
`AllSiblingSystemParachains` for that. I was thinking about
`AllSystemParachains`, but it may cause wrong impression that it can be
used at a relay chain level.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
# Motivation (+testing)
### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm`
We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
needing to teleport some non-fee asset?
This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
user.
This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
(the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
between said parachain and AssetHub).
Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.
# Description
Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
transfers for all `assets` including fees.
Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
`assets` including fees.
For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.
`assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
be teleportable to `dest`.
No limitations imposed on `fees`.
- for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
`beneficiary`.
- for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
## Review notes
Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Removes obsolete fields from the `QueueConfigData` structure. For the
remaining fields, if they use the old defaults, we replace them with the
new defaults.
Resolves: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1795
## Overview
This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent
changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142)
made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes.
It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`.
## Details
During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the
`spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on
version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`.
With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number
(still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as
`01_02_003`.
This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the
fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
This PR fixes two things:
- relax `force_default_xcm_version` for testnet system parachains (e.g.
BridgeHubWestend has now 2 and there is no way to change it to 3, so we
need to call `force_xcm_version(3)` for every parachain that it is
connected to, because we send XCMv3 messages)
- add `Storage` item to `PolkadotXcm` pallet definition (now we cannot
see storage items for `pallet_xcm` in PJS)
## TODO
- [ ] when merged open PR to `polkadot-fellows/runtimes` repo
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/106
Port of cumulus PR https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/pull/2960
This PR adds the ability to bid for collator slots even after the max
number of collators have already registered. This eliminates the first
come, first served mechanism that was in place before.
Key changes:
- added `update_bond` extrinsic to allow registered candidates to adjust
their bonds in order to dynamically control their bids
- added `take_candidate_slot` extrinsic to try to replace an already
existing candidate by bidding more than them
- candidates are now kept in a sorted list in the pallet storage, where
the top `DesiredCandidates` out of `MaxCandidates` candidates in the
list will be selected by the session pallet as collators
- if the candidacy bond is increased through a `set_candidacy_bond`
call, candidates which don't meet the new bond requirements are kicked
# Checklist
- [ ] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the
"Description" section above
- [ ] My PR follows the [labeling
requirements](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#process)
of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required)
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if
applicable)
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works (if applicable)
- [ ] If this PR alters any external APIs or interfaces used by
Polkadot, the corresponding Polkadot PR is ready as well as the
corresponding Cumulus PR (optional)
---------
Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io>
## Motivation
`pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality,
including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and
`reserve_transfer_assets()` calls.
While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()`
works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and
beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_.
## Solution
This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to
support transfers when reserves are other chains.
This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset
transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`.
Enables following scenarios:
- transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff
asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases),
- transferring assets with reserve on destination,
- transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff
assets and fees have same remote reserve),
- transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the
asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset
with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains,
even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve,
- transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using
fees which can be teleported between involved chains.
All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having
to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario
and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built
automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and
trusted reserves.
#### Current limitations:
- while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or
fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among
themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly
enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely
increased in the future).
- `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote**
reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more
complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future
holds).
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055
---------
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
We are introducing a new set of `XcmController` traits (final name yet
to be determined).
These traits are implemented by `pallet-xcm` and allows other pallets,
such as `pallet_contracts`, to rely on these traits instead of tight
coupling them to `pallet-xcm`.
Using only the existing Xcm traits would mean duplicating the logic from
`pallet-xcm` in these other pallets, which we aim to avoid. Our
objective is to ensure that when these APIs are called from
`pallet-contracts`, they produce the exact same outcomes as if called
directly from `pallet-xcm`.
The other benefits is that we can also expose return values to
`pallet-contracts` instead of just calling `pallet-xcm` dispatchable and
getting a `DispatchResult` back.
See traits integration in this PR
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1248, where the traits
are used as follow to define and implement `pallet-contracts` Config.
```rs
// Contracts config:
pub trait Config: frame_system::Config {
// ...
/// A type that exposes XCM APIs, allowing contracts to interact with other parachains, and
/// execute XCM programs.
type Xcm: xcm_executor::traits::Controller<
OriginFor<Self>,
<Self as frame_system::Config>::RuntimeCall,
BlockNumberFor<Self>,
>;
}
// implementation
impl pallet_contracts::Config for Runtime {
// ...
type Xcm = pallet_xcm::Pallet<Self>;
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
This PR changes the registration order of the `MessageQueue` pallet so
that it is registered last.
This is necessary so that the
[on_initialize](https://github.com/Snowfork/snowbridge/blob/df8d5da82e517a65fb0858a4f2ead533290336b5/parachain/pallets/outbound-queue/src/lib.rs#L267)
hooks for Snowbridge can run before `MessageQueue` delivers messages
using its own `on_initialize`.
Generally, I think this is preferable regardless of Snowbridge's
particular requirements. Other pallets may want to do housekeeping
before MessageQueue starts delivering messages.
I'm hoping this PR, if accepted, can be included in the same release as
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1246. As otherwise,
changing the order of pallet registration is an ABI-breaking change.
Liam Aharon