The `BlockBuilderProvider` was a trait that was defined in
`sc-block-builder`. The trait was implemented for `Client`. This
basically meant that you needed to import `sc-block-builder` any way to
have access to the block builder. So, this trait was not providing any
real value. This pull request is removing the said trait. Instead of the
trait it introduces a builder for creating a `BlockBuilder`. The builder
currently has the quite fabulous name `BlockBuilderBuilder` (I'm open to
any better name 😅). The rest of the pull request is about
replacing the old trait with the new builder.
# Downstream code changes
If you used `new_block` or `new_block_at` before you now need to switch
it over to the new `BlockBuilderBuilder` pattern:
```rust
// `new` requires a type that implements `CallApiAt`.
let mut block_builder = BlockBuilderBuilder::new(client)
// Then you need to specify the hash of the parent block the block will be build on top of
.on_parent_block(at)
// The block builder also needs the block number of the parent block.
// Here it is fetched from the given `client` using the `HeaderBackend`
// However, there also exists `with_parent_block_number` for directly passing the number
.fetch_parent_block_number(client)
.unwrap()
// Enable proof recording if required. This call is optional.
.enable_proof_recording()
// Pass the digests. This call is optional.
.with_inherent_digests(digests)
.build()
.expect("Creates new block builder");
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <skunert49@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
* Change copyright year to 2023 from 2022
* Fix incorrect update of copyright year
* Remove years from copy right header
* Fix remaining files
* Fix typo in a header and remove update-copyright.sh
* `BlockId` removal: `BlockBuilderProvider::new_block_at`
It changes the arguments of `BlockBuilderProvider::new_block_at` from:
`BlockId<Block>` to: `Block::Hash`
* fmt
* fix
* more fixes
* Prepare UI tests for rust 1.54
* Delete wrong_page.stderr
* CI: run with a staging CI image
* Revert "CI: run with a staging CI image"
This reverts commit 66f5b00d14b50fd9d8fbf773f7e884f380697591.
* CI: debug, again
* LOG_TARGET is only used in std
* Remove unnecessary unsafe
* Fixes
* Use correct rustc locally
* FMT
* Compile with benchmarking
* Review feedback
* Some ui tests
* I know...
* Fix wasm tests
Co-authored-by: Denis P <denis.pisarev@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com>
* Run cargo fmt on the whole code base
* Second run
* Add CI check
* Fix compilation
* More unnecessary braces
* Handle weights
* Use --all
* Use correct attributes...
* Fix UI tests
* AHHHHHHHHH
* 🤦
* Docs
* Fix compilation
* 🤷
* Please stop
* 🤦 x 2
* More
* make rustfmt.toml consistent with polkadot
Co-authored-by: André Silva <andrerfosilva@gmail.com>
* Make grandpa work
* Introduce `SharedData`
* Add test and fix bugs
* Switch to `SharedData`
* Make grandpa tests working
* More Babe work
* Make it async
* Fix fix
* Use `async_trait` in sc-consensus-slots
This makes the code a little bit easier to read and also expresses that
there can always only be one call at a time to `on_slot`.
* Make grandpa tests compile
* More Babe tests work
* Fix network test
* Start fixing service test
* Finish service-test
* Fix sc-consensus-aura
* Fix fix fix
* More fixes
* Make everything compile *yeah*
* Fix build when we have Rust 1.51
* Update client/consensus/common/src/shared_data.rs
Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update client/consensus/common/src/shared_data.rs
Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update client/consensus/common/src/shared_data.rs
Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update client/consensus/common/src/shared_data.rs
Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update client/consensus/common/src/shared_data.rs
Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update client/consensus/babe/src/tests.rs
Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update client/consensus/babe/src/tests.rs
Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix warning
Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
* Drop client from sc-network and sc-client-db, move LongestChain to sc-client-api
* move leaves, cht, in_mem to sc-client-api, drop client from sc-finality-grandpa
* drop sc-service from sc-rpc
* drop sc-service from sc-consensus-aura
* drop sc-client from manual-seal and babe
* drop sc-client from utils/frame/rpc/system and utils/frame/benchmarking-cli
* drop sc-client from bin/node and bin/node-template
* drop sc-client
* fix tests
* remove check -p sc-client from gitlab.yml
* fix warnings
* fixes ui test
* fix light client tests
* adds associated Client type to AbstractService
* adds UsageProvider to Client
* fixed ui test, again
* tried and failed to get node-cli to compile for wasm
* thanks to tomaka for helping me get node-cli to compile for wasmm
* ui test pls pas 🙏🏾
* all tests passing 🪄
* no_run documentation code
* rm -f documentation code
* ClientProvider
* fix mega trait
* move LongestChain to sc-consensus, use adds minimal bounds to AbstractService::Client
* adds license to sc-consensus
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Kampmann <ben@parity.io>
This reduces the usage of `Blake2Hasher` in the code base and replaces
it with `BlakeTwo256`. The most important change is the removal of the
custom extern function for `Blake2Hasher`. The runtime `Hash` trait is
now also simplified and directly requires that the implementing type
implements `Hashable`.
* Extend `Proposer` to optionally generate a proof of the proposal
* Something
* Refactor sr-api to not depend on client anymore
* Fix benches
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-Authored-By: Tomasz Drwięga <tomusdrw@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
* Introduce new `into_storage_changes` function
* Switch to runtime api for `execute_block` and don't require `H256`
anywhere in the code
* Put the `StorageChanges` into the `Proposal`
* Move the runtime api error to its own trait
* Adds `StorageTransactionCache` to the runtime api
This requires that we add `type NodeBlock = ` to the
`impl_runtime_apis!` macro to work around some bugs in rustc :(
* Remove `type NodeBlock` and switch to a "better" hack
* Start using the transaction cache from the runtime api
* Make it compile
* Move `InMemory` to its own file
* Make all tests work again
* Return block, storage_changes and proof from Blockbuilder::bake()
* Make sure that we use/set `storage_changes` when possible
* Add test
* Fix deadlock
* Remove accidentally added folders
* Introduce `RecordProof` as argument type to be more explicit
* Update client/src/client.rs
Co-Authored-By: Tomasz Drwięga <tomusdrw@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update primitives/state-machine/src/ext.rs
Co-Authored-By: Tomasz Drwięga <tomusdrw@users.noreply.github.com>
* Integrates review feedback
* Remove `unsafe` usage
* Update client/block-builder/src/lib.rs
Co-Authored-By: Benjamin Kampmann <ben@gnunicorn.org>
* Update client/src/call_executor.rs
* Bump versions
Co-authored-by: Tomasz Drwięga <tomusdrw@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Kampmann <ben.kampmann@googlemail.com>
Bastian Köcher