## TODO
- [x] change constants when CI fails (should fail :) )
## Result
On the AssetHubRococo: 1701175800126 -> 1700929825257 = 0.15 %
decreased.
```
# Before ( [xcm] Fix `SovereignPaidRemoteExporter` and `DepositAsset` handling (#3157))
Feb 02 12:59:05.520 ERROR bridges::estimate: `bridging::XcmBridgeHubRouterBaseFee` actual value: 1701175800126 for runtime: statemine-1006000 (statemine-0.tx14.au1)
# After
Feb 02 13:02:40.647 ERROR bridges::estimate: `bridging::XcmBridgeHubRouterBaseFee` actual value: 1700929825257 for runtime: statemine-1006000 (statemine-0.tx14.au1)
```
On the AssetHubWestend: 2116038876326 -> 1641718372993 = 22.4 %
decreased.
```
# Before ( [xcm] Fix `SovereignPaidRemoteExporter` and `DepositAsset` handling (#3157))
Feb 02 12:56:00.880 ERROR bridges::estimate: `bridging::XcmBridgeHubRouterBaseFee` actual value: 2116038876326 for runtime: westmint-1006000 (westmint-0.tx14.au1)
# After
Feb 02 13:04:42.515 ERROR bridges::estimate: `bridging::XcmBridgeHubRouterBaseFee` actual value: 1641718372993 for runtime: westmint-1006000 (westmint-0.tx14.au1)
```
I think I broke it in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2139 - fees has
increased and amounts that we send are no longer enough to cover fees.
Also changed a consts (test + 33%) using latest weights.
---------
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
This PR adds [Rococo
People](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281) <> [Rococo
Bulletin](https://github.com/zdave-parity/polkadot-bulletin-chain) to
the Rococo Bridge Hub code. There's a couple of things left to do here:
- [x] add remaining tests - it'd need some refactoring in the
`bridge-hub-test-utils` - will do in a separate PR;
- [x] actually run benchmarks for new messaging pallet (do we have bot
nowadays?).
The reason why I'm opening it before this ^^^ is ready, is that I'd like
to hear others opinion on how to deal with hacks with that bridge.
Initially I was assuming that Rococo Bulletin will be the 1:1 copy of
the Polkadot Bulletin (to avoid maintaining multiple
runtimes/releases/...), so you can see many `PolkadotBulletin` mentions
in this PR, even though we are going to bridge with the parallel chain
(`RococoBulletin`). That's because e.g. pallet names from
`construct_runtime` are affecting runtime storage keys and bridges are
using runtime storage proofs => it is important to use names that the
Bulletin chain expects.
But in the end, this hack won't work - we can't use Polkadot Bulletin
runtime to bridge with Rococo Bridge Hub, because Polkadot Bulletin
expects Polkadot Bridge hub to use `1002` parachain id and Rococo Bridge
Hub seats on the `1013`. This also affects storage keys using in
bridging, so I had to add the [`rococo`
feature](https://github.com/svyatonik/polkadot-bulletin-chain/blob/add-bridge-pallets/runtime/Cargo.toml#L198)
to the Bulletin chain. So now we can actually alter its runtime and
adapt it for Rococo.
So the question here is - what's better for us here
- to leave everything as is (seems hacky and non-trivial);
- change Bulletin chain runtime when `rococo` feature is used - e.g. use
proper names there (`WithPolkadotGrandpa` -> `WithRococoGrandpa`, ...)
- add another set of pallets to the Bulletin chain runtime to bridge
with Rococo and never use them in production. Similar to hack that we
had in Rococo/Wococo
cc @acatangiu @bkontur @serban300
also cc @joepetrowski as the main "client" of this bridge
---
A couple words on how this bridge is different from the Rococo <>
Westend bridge:
- it is a bridge with a chain that uses GRANDPA finality, not the
parachain finality (hence the tests needs to be changed);
- it is a fee-free bridge. So
`AllowExplicitUnpaidExecutionFrom<Equals<SiblingPeople>>` + we are not
paying any rewards to relayers (apart from compensating transaction
costs).
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Egor_P <egor@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
We currently use a bit of a hack in `.cargo/config` to make sure that
clippy isn't too annoying by specifying the list of lints.
There is now a stable way to define lints for a workspace. The only down
side is that every crate seems to have to opt into this so there's a
*few* files modified in this PR.
Dependencies:
- [x] PR that upgrades CI to use rust 1.74 is merged.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and
adds CI to keep them tidy.
If people want we can customise the format rules as described here
https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html
@ggwpez, I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are
propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and
conflicts.
TODO
- [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet
tests instead of deleting the dir
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Right now governance could only control byte-fee component of Rococo <>
Westend message fees (paid at Asset Hubs). This PR changes it a bit:
1) governance now allowed to control both fee components - byte fee and
base fee;
2) base fee now includes cost of "default" delivery and confirmation
transactions, in addition to `ExportMessage` instruction cost.
## Summary
Asset bridging support for AssetHub**Rococo** <-> AssetHub**Wococo** was
added [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1215), so
now we aim to bridge AssetHub**Rococo** and AssetHub**Westend**. (And
perhaps retire AssetHubWococo and the Wococo chains).
## Solution
**bridge-hub-westend-runtime**
- added new runtime as a copy of `bridge-hub-rococo-runtime`
- added support for bridging to `BridgeHubRococo`
- added tests and benchmarks
**bridge-hub-rococo-runtime**
- added support for bridging to `BridgeHubWestend`
- added tests and benchmarks
- internal refactoring by splitting bridge configuration per network,
e.g., `bridge_to_whatevernetwork_config.rs`.
**asset-hub-rococo-runtime**
- added support for asset bridging to `AssetHubWestend` (allows to
receive only WNDs)
- added new xcm router for `Westend`
- added tests and benchmarks
**asset-hub-westend-runtime**
- added support for asset bridging to `AssetHubRococo` (allows to
receive only ROCs)
- added new xcm router for `Rococo`
- added tests and benchmarks
## Deployment
All changes will be deployed as a part of
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1988.
## TODO
- [x] benchmarks for all pallet instances
- [x] integration tests
- [x] local run scripts
Relates to:
https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2602
Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1988
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR does not introduce any functional changes to the existing code,
it merely addresses several minor refactors:
- Moving bridging pallets to separate files.
- Improving the readability and naming of weight files for bridging
pallets and bridging pallet instances.
The reason for this refactor is to facilitate easier plugin integration
for the upcoming bridge between Rococo and Westend.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
This commit adds Rococo Asset Hub dedicated runtime so we can test new
features here, before merging them in Kusama Asset Hub.
Also adds one such feature: asset transfer over bridge (Rococo AssetHub
<> Wococo AssetHub)
- clone `asset-hub-kusama-runtime` -> `asset-hub-rococo-runtime`
- make it use Rococo primitives, names, assets, constants, etc
- add asset-transfer-over-bridge support to Rococo AssetHub <> Wococo
AssetHub
Fixes#1128
---------
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Branislav Kontur