* Companion for Substrate#10655
https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/10655
This removes the last usages of `Default` in conjunction with `AccountId`
* More fixes
* More of them!
* FMT
* Update Substrate
* Add `without_storage_info`
The MaxEncodedLen trait is now enforced by default in Substrate.
All pallets missing an implementation need to be marked with
`without_storage_info` now.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Remove `generate_storage_info`
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Add more `without_storage_info`
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* update lockfile for {"substrate"}
Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
* fix miscalculation of remaining weight
* rename a var
* move out enforcing filtering by dropping inherents
* prepare for dispute statement validity check being split off
* refactor
* refactor, only check disputes we actually want to include
* more refactor and documentation
* refactor and minimize inherent checks
* chore: warnings
* fix a few tests
* fix dedup regression
* fix
* more asserts in tests
* remove some asserts
* chore: fmt
* skip signatures checks, some more
* undo unwatend changes
* Update runtime/parachains/src/paras_inherent/mod.rs
Co-authored-by: sandreim <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
* cleanups, checking CheckedDisputeStatments makes no sense
* integrity, if called create_inherent_inner, it shall do the checks, and not rely on enter_inner
* review comments
* use from impl rather than into
* remove outdated comment
* adjust tests accordingly
* assure no weight is lost
* address review comments
* remove unused import
* split error into two and document
* use assurance, O(n)
* Revert "adjust tests accordingly"
This reverts commit 3cc9a3c449f82db38cea22c48f4a21876603374b.
* fix comment
* fix sorting
* comment
Co-authored-by: sandreim <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
if the PVF pre-checking is disabled the runtime dispatchable will reject
any attempts of submission. This is also concern the unsigned tx
validation.
Right now, the `include_pvf_check_statement` dispatchable is effectively
uncallable because of the weight set to the maximum value. If we were to
benchmark it, it would become includable in a block, but since there
will be no active votes, the dispatchable won't do anything.
However, it will execute some code, like signature validation and
querying some storage entries. To be completely safe, we can bail out
early if the `pvf_checking_enabled` config is disabled. That's what this
PR does.
* add fast-runtime feature for reduced session times
* make democracy periods fast on fast-runtime
* propagate fast-runtime feature through cargo.toml files
* add fast motion and term durations to Kusama
* Update runtime/westend/Cargo.toml
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
* set session time to 2 minutes to avoid block production issues
* formatting
* update Substrate
* set democracy fast periods back to 1min
* set launch period and enactment period to 1 block in fast-runtime
* remove unnecessary westend period configs
* add prod_or_test macro to allow specifying prod, test and env values for parameter types
* move prod_or_test macro into common module and use it consistently
* rename macro to prod_or_fast
* cargo +nightly fmt
* bump impl_versions
* newline
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
* add note that env variable is evaluated at compile time
* newline
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
* newline
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
* cargo fmt
* impl_version: 0
* impl_version: 0
* use prod_or_fast macro for LeasePeriod and LeaseOffset
* use prod_or_fast macro in WND and ROC constants
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Giles Cope <gilescope@gmail.com>
In this PR, paras module emit runtime events on certain PVF pre-checking
related conditions.
Specifically, there are 3 new events in the paras module:
1. PvfCheckStarted
2. PvfCheckAccepted
3. PvfCheckRejected
All of those have identifiers for the parachain that triggered the PVF
pre-checking and the validation code that goes through the pre-checking.
The mechanics of those are as follows. Each time a new PVF is added, be
it due to onboarding or upgrading, the `PvfCheckStarted` will be
triggered. If another parachain triggers a pre-checking process for the
validation code which is already being pre-checked, another
`PvfCheckStarted` event will be triggered with the corresponding para
id.
When the PVF pre-checking voting for a PVF was finished, several
`PvfCheckAccepted/Rejected` events will be triggered: one for each para id that
was subscribed to this check (i.e. was a "cause" for it).
If the PVF pre-checking is disabled, then one can still expect these
events to be fired. Since insta PVF approval is syncronous, the
`PvfCheckStarted` will be followed by the `PvfCheckAccepted` with the
same validation code and para id.
If somebody is interested in following validation code changes for a PVF
of a parachain, they would need to subscribe to those events. I did not
supply the topics for the events, since I am not sure if that's needed
or will be used, but they can be added later if needed.
* Move XCM runtime configurations into their own files
* Update copyright year
* Fix compilation errors
* Import XCM types in westend runtime unit tests
* Remove sleep and use polkadot test service
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* updates
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* Fix other tests
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* Run metrics tests separately
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* copy some substrate utilities
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* update runtime metric test
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* Remove sleep from cli tests
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* cargo
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* Polkadot companion for Substrate#10463 (#4519)
* Grandpa and Beefy protocol names include chain id
Signed-off-by: acatangiu <adrian@parity.io>
* chain_spec: include fork id
* use simplified protocol name
* fix after merge
* avoid using hash default, even for protocol names
* update lockfile for substrate
Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
* configuration: Update upgrade validation delay doc (#4662)
* typo
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* review feedback
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* cargo lock
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* use testnet profile
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* Don't run with runtime-benchmark feature
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
* conditional compile up one level
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Sergei Shulepov <sergei@parity.io>
Closes#3971
Read the linked issue.
Apart from that, this addresses the concern raised in this [comment] by
just adding a test. I couldn't find a clean way to reconcile a block
number delay with a PVF voting TTL, so I just resorted to rely on the
test. Should be fine for now.
[comment]: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/4457#discussion_r770517562
* paras: add governance control dispatchables
Adds a couple of functions for governance control for the paras module
in the anticipation of PVF pre-checking enabling.
Specifically, this commit adds a function for pre-registering a PVF that
governance trusts enough. This function will come in handy in case there
is a parachain that does not follow the GoAhead signal. That is, does
not include https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/pull/517.
This may be not an exhaustive list of the functions that may come in
handy. Any suggestions to add more are welcome.
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=kusama-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/kusama/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras.rs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=polkadot-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/polkadot/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras.rs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=westend-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/westend/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras.rs
* cargo run --quiet --release --features runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark --chain=rococo-dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=runtime_parachains::paras --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --header=./file_header.txt --output=./runtime/rococo/src/weights/runtime_parachains_paras.rs
Co-authored-by: Parity Bot <admin@parity.io>
Closes#4248
Impose additional constraint on configuration consistency:
`validation_upgrade_delay` should not be less than or equal to 1.
See the original issue for more details.
Setting zero as weight may be a source of problems.
The problem is, a rogue validator can shove a lot of duplicated votes
and thus fill a block with work that may well exceed the weight limit.
This commit refactors the consistency checks. Instead of each individual
setter performs its checks locally, we delegate those checks to the
already existing function `check_consistency`. This removes duplication
and simplifies the logic.
A motivating example of this one is the next PR in the stack that will
introduce a check for a field, which validity depends on the validity of
other two fields. Without this refactoring we will have to place a check
not only to the field in question, but also to the other two fields so
that if they are changed they do not violate consistency criteria. It's
easy to imagine how this can go unwieldy with the number of checks.
This also adds a test that verifies that the default chain spec host
configuration is consistent.