We currently use a bit of a hack in `.cargo/config` to make sure that
clippy isn't too annoying by specifying the list of lints.
There is now a stable way to define lints for a workspace. The only down
side is that every crate seems to have to opt into this so there's a
*few* files modified in this PR.
Dependencies:
- [x] PR that upgrades CI to use rust 1.74 is merged.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
So far the `bridge-hub-test-utils` contained a tests set for testing
BridgeHub runtime that is bridging with the remote **parachain**. But we
have https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2540 coming, which
would add Rococo <> Bulletin chain bridge (where Bulletin = standalone
chain that is using GRANDPA finality). Then it'll be expanded to
Polkadot BH as well.
So this PR adds the same set of tests to the `bridge-hub-test-utils`,
but for the case when remote chain is the chain with GRANDPA finality.
There's a lot of changes in this PR - I'll describe some:
- I've added `BasicParachainRuntime` trait to decrease number of lines
we need to add to `where` clause. Could revert, but imo it is useful;
- `cumulus/parachains/runtimes/bridge-hubs/test-utils/src/test_data` is
a submodule for generating test data for the test sets.
`from_parachain.rs` is used in tests for the case when remote chain is a
parachain, `from_grandpa_chain.rs` - for the bridges with remote GRANDPA
chains. `mod.rs` has some code, shared by both types of tests;
- `cumulus/parachains/runtimes/bridge-hubs/test-utils/src/test_data` is
a submodule with all test cases. The `mod.rs` has tests, suitable for
all cases. There's also `wth_parachain.rs` and `with_grandpa_chain.rs`
with the same meaning as above;
- I've merged the "core" code of two previous tests -
`relayed_incoming_message_works` and `complex_relay_extrinsic_works`
into one single `relayed_incoming_message_works` test. So now we are
always constructing extrinsics and are dispatching them using executive
module (meaning all signed extensions are also tested).
New test set is used here:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2540. Once this PR is
merged, I'll merge that other PR with master to remove duplicate
changes.
I'm also planning to cleanup generic constraints + remove some
unnecessary assumptions about used chains in a follow-up PRs. But for
now I think this PR has enough changes, so don't want to complicate it
even more.
---
Breaking changes for the code that have used those tests before:
- the `construct_and_apply_extrinsic` callback now accepts the
`RuntimeCall` instead of the `pallet_utility::Call`;
- the `construct_and_apply_extrinsic` now may be called multiple times
for the single test, so make sure the `frame_system::CheckNonce` is
correctly constructed;
- all previous tests have been moved from
`bridge_hub_test_utils::test_cases` to
`bridge_hub_test_utils::test_cases::from_parachain` module;
- there are several changes in test arguments - please refer to
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/compare/sv-tests-for-bridge-with-remote-grandpa-chain?expand=1#diff-79a28d4d3e1749050341c2424f00c4c139825b1a20937767f83e58b95166735c
for details.
Initial implementation for the plan discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/701
Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178
v0: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7554,
## Overall idea
When approval-voting checks a candidate and is ready to advertise the
approval, defer it in a per-relay chain block until we either have
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT candidates to sign or a candidate has stayed
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS in the queue, in both cases we sign what
candidates we have available.
This should allow us to reduce the number of approvals messages we have
to create/send/verify. The parameters are configurable, so we should
find some values that balance:
- Security of the network: Delaying broadcasting of an approval
shouldn't but the finality at risk and to make sure that never happens
we won't delay sending a vote if we are past 2/3 from the no-show time.
- Scalability of the network: MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT = 1 &
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS =0, is what we have now and we know from
the measurements we did on versi, it bottlenecks
approval-distribution/approval-voting when increase significantly the
number of validators and parachains
- Block storage: In case of disputes we have to import this votes on
chain and that increase the necessary storage with
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT * CandidateHash per vote. Given that
disputes are not the normal way of the network functioning and we will
limit MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT in the single digits numbers, this
should be good enough. Alternatively, we could try to create a better
way to store this on-chain through indirection, if that's needed.
## Other fixes:
- Fixed the fact that we were sending random assignments to
non-validators, that was wrong because those won't do anything with it
and they won't gossip it either because they do not have a grid topology
set, so we would waste the random assignments.
- Added metrics to be able to debug potential no-shows and
mis-processing of approvals/assignments.
## TODO:
- [x] Get feedback, that this is moving in the right direction. @ordian
@sandreim @eskimor @burdges, let me know what you think.
- [x] More and more testing.
- [x] Test in versi.
- [x] Make MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT &
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_WAIT_MILLIS a parachain host configuration.
- [x] Make sure the backwards compatibility works correctly
- [x] Make sure this direction is compatible with other streams of work:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/635 &
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/742
- [x] Final versi burn-in before merging
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <alexandru.gheorghe@parity.io>
We were not filtering for sibling parachains, but for sibling anything
---------
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
## Summary
This pull request proposes a solution for improved control of the
versioned XCM flow over the bridge (across different consensus chains)
and resolves the situation where the sending chain/consensus has already
migrated to a higher XCM version than the receiving chain/consensus.
## Problem/Motivation
The current flow over the bridge involves a transfer from AssetHubRococo
(AHR) to BridgeHubRococo (BHR) to BridgeHubWestend (BHW) and finally to
AssetHubWestend (AHW), beginning with a reserve-backed transfer on AHR.
In this process:
1. AHR sends XCM `ExportMessage` through `XcmpQueue`, incorporating XCM
version checks using the `WrapVersion` feature, influenced by
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion` (managed by
`pallet_xcm::force_xcm_version` or version discovery).
2. BHR handles the `ExportMessage` instruction, utilizing the latest XCM
version. The `HaulBlobExporter` converts the inner XCM to
[`VersionedXcm::from`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/63ac2471aa0210f0ac9903bdd7d8f9351f9a635f/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465-L467),
also using the latest XCM version.
However, challenges arise:
- Incompatibility when BHW uses a different version than BHR. For
instance, if BHR migrates to **XCMv4** while BHW remains on **XCMv3**,
BHR's `VersionedXcm::from` uses `VersionedXcm::V4` variant, causing
encoding issues for BHW.
```
/// Just a simulation of possible error, which could happen on BHW
/// (this code is based on actual master without XCMv4)
let encoded = hex_literal::hex!("0400");
println!("{:?}", VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(&mut &encoded[..]));
Err(Error { cause: None, desc: "Could not decode `VersionedXcm`, variant
doesn't exist" })
```
- Similar compatibility issues exist between AHR and AHW.
## Solution
This pull request introduces the following solutions:
1. **New trait `CheckVersion`** - added to the `xcm` module and exposing
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`. This enhancement allows checking the
actual XCM version for desired destinations outside of the `pallet_xcm`
module.
2. **Version Check in `HaulBlobExporter`** uses `CheckVersion` to check
known/configured destination versions, ensuring compatibility. For
example, in the scenario mentioned, BHR can store the version `3` for
BHW. If BHR is on XCMv4, it will attempt to downgrade the message to
version `3` instead of using the latest version `4`.
3. **Version Check in `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`** - this check
ensures compatibility with the real destination's XCM version,
preventing the unnecessary sending of messages to the local bridge hub
if versions are incompatible.
These additions aim to improve the control and compatibility of XCM
flows over the bridge and addressing issues related to version
mismatches.
## Possible alternative solution
_(More investigation is needed, and at the very least, it should extend
to XCMv4/5. If this proves to be a viable option, I can open an RFC for
XCM.)._
Add the `XcmVersion` attribute to the `ExportMessage` so that the
sending chain can determine, based on what is stored in
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`, the version the destination is using.
This way, we may not need to handle the version in `HaulBlobExporter`.
```
ExportMessage {
network: NetworkId,
destination: InteriorMultiLocation,
xcm: Xcm<()>
destination_xcm_version: Version, // <- new attritbute
},
```
```
pub trait ExportXcm {
fn validate(
network: NetworkId,
channel: u32,
universal_source: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
destination: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
message: &mut Option<Xcm<()>>,
destination_xcm_version: Version, , // <- new attritbute
) -> SendResult<Self::Ticket>;
```
## Future Directions
This PR does not fix version discovery over bridge, further
investigation will be conducted here:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2417.
## TODO
- [x] `pallet_xcm` mock for tests uses hard-coded XCM version `2` -
change to 3 or lastest?
- [x] fix `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`
- [x] fix HaulBlobExporter with version determination
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/2183669d05f9b510f979a0cc3c7847707bacba2e/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465)
- [x] add unit-tests to the runtimes
- [x] run benchmarks for `ExportMessage`
- [x] extend local run scripts about `force_xcm_version(dest, version)`
- [ ] when merged, prepare governance calls for Rococo/Westend
- [ ] add PRDoc
Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2719
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved
in a release and build:
- the changelog
- a simple draft of audience documentation
Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version
1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file.
This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content
allowing to properly generate the changelog.
The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience
documentation.
The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when
all PR come with a proper `prdoc`.
## Assumptions
- the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under
`prdoc/X.Y.Z`
- the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author +
topic. Thos fields are optional.
The build script can be called as:
```
VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh
```
Related:
- #1408
---------
Co-authored-by: EgorPopelyaev <egor@parity.io>
Treasury Pallet Instance for the Fellowship in Westend Collectives.
In this update, we present a Treasury Pallet Instance that is under the
control of the Fellowship body, with oversight from the Root and
Treasurer origins. Here's how it is governed:
- the Root origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
proposals, with no amount limit for approvals.
- the Treasurer origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
proposals, with approval limits of up to 10,000,000 DOT.
- Voice of all Fellows ranked at 3 or above can reject or approve spend
proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000 DOT.
- Voice of Fellows ranked at 4 or above can also reject or approve spend
proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000,000 DOT.
Additionally, we introduce the Asset Rate Pallet Instance to establish
conversion rates from asset A to B. This is used to determine if a
proposed spend amount involving a non-native asset is permissible by the
commanding origin. The rates can be set up by the Root, Treasurer
origins, or Voice of all Fellows.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <joe@parity.io>
`testnets-common` was introduced recently to start to separate testnet
parachain configurations from those of Polkadot and Kusama.
The `locks-review` and `polkadot-review` requirements are removed from
`parachains-common` in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2564 and there are
[plans](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2564#discussion_r1410882115)
to move the Polkadot and Kusama contents of that package to the
fellowship, `testnets-common` is no longer needed.
This PR removes the crate and replaces uses of it in
`collectives-westend`, the only place it is currently used.
As suggested in this thread:
https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/87#discussion_r1400237122
We already have the `IsChildSystemParachain`, which may be used at relay
chain, but it can't be used at a parachain level. So let's use
`AllSiblingSystemParachains` for that. I was thinking about
`AllSystemParachains`, but it may cause wrong impression that it can be
used at a relay chain level.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
# Motivation (+testing)
### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm`
We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
needing to teleport some non-fee asset?
This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
user.
This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
(the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
between said parachain and AssetHub).
Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.
# Description
Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
transfers for all `assets` including fees.
Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
`assets` including fees.
For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.
`assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
be teleportable to `dest`.
No limitations imposed on `fees`.
- for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
`beneficiary`.
- for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
## Review notes
Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Removes obsolete fields from the `QueueConfigData` structure. For the
remaining fields, if they use the old defaults, we replace them with the
new defaults.
Resolves: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1795
Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and
adds CI to keep them tidy.
If people want we can customise the format rules as described here
https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html
@ggwpez, I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are
propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and
conflicts.
TODO
- [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet
tests instead of deleting the dir
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
see #2189
This PR does the following:
- Bring the user api functions into a new pallet-contracts-uapi (They
are currently defined in ink!
[here])(https://github.com/paritytech/ink/blob/master/crates/env/src/engine/on_chain/ext.rs)
- Add older api versions and unstable to the user api trait.
- Remove pallet-contracts-primitives and bring the types it defined in
uapi / pallet-contracts
- Add the infrastructure to build fixtures from Rust files and test it
works by replacing `dummy.wat` and `call.wat`
- Move all the doc from wasm/runtime.rs to pallet-contracts-uapi.
This will be done in a follow up:
- convert the rest of the test from .wat to rust
- bring risc-v uapi up to date with wasm
- finalize the uapi host fns, making sure everything is codegen from the
source host fns in pallet-contracts
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com>
Since the Polkadot and Kusama runtimes are no longer in the repo, the
relevant systems parachains runtimes also need to be removed. More
context [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/603)
and [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1731).
Removes the following:
- `asset-hub-kusama` and `asset-hub-polkadot`
- `bridge-hub-kusama` and `bridge-hub-polkadot`
- `collectives-polkadot`
- `glutton-kusama`
Partially solves #603 and adds to #1731.
## Overview
This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent
changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142)
made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes.
It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`.
## Details
During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the
`spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on
version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`.
With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number
(still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as
`01_02_003`.
This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the
fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
On extrinsics/call, ensure local XCM execution is complete/successful.
Otherwise, fail the extrinsic so that state changes don't get committed
to the db.
Added regression tests that fail without the fix.
fixes#2237
---------
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Westend Collectives migration CI check can be fixed once we have
https://github.com/paritytech/try-runtime-cli/pull/58, will open another
PR once it is available.
- [x] Remove deprecated `DmpQueue` pallet from Rococo Contracts, the
migration is complete
- [x] Fix Asset Hub Rococo storage versions
- [x] Add migration check CI for Asset Hub Rococo and Westend Bridge Hub
This PR fixes two things:
- relax `force_default_xcm_version` for testnet system parachains (e.g.
BridgeHubWestend has now 2 and there is no way to change it to 3, so we
need to call `force_xcm_version(3)` for every parachain that it is
connected to, because we send XCMv3 messages)
- add `Storage` item to `PolkadotXcm` pallet definition (now we cannot
see storage items for `pallet_xcm` in PJS)
## TODO
- [ ] when merged open PR to `polkadot-fellows/runtimes` repo
Refunding surplus happens anyway on xcm_executor::post_process(),
automatically refunding surplus to original_origin at the end of
execution. Since SovereignPaidRemoteExporter doesn't ClearOrigin, it can
simply rely on the automatic mechanism.
Furthermore, RefundSurplus instruction refunds _surplus_. Surplus exists
only as a result of Transact, SetErrorHandler or SetAppendix
instructions, none of which being part of the
SovereignPaidRemoteExporter XCM program. So surplus is always zero here
anyway.
Add collectives and glutton parachain westend runtimes to prepare for
#1737.
The removal of system parachain native runtimes #1737 is blocked until
chainspecs and runtime APIs can be dealt with cleanly (merge of #1256
and follow up PRs).
In the meantime, these additions are ready to be merged to `master`, so
I have separated them out into this PR.
Also marked `bridge-hub-westend` as unimplemented in line with [this
issue](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2602).
TODO
- [x] add to `command-bot` benchmarks
- [x] add to `command-bot-scripts` benchmarks
- [x] generate weights
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muharem <ismailov.m.h@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
This PR introduces:
- XCM host functions `xcm_send`, `xcm_execute`
- An Xcm trait into the config. that proxy these functions to to
`pallet_xcm`, or disable their usage by using `()`.
- A mock_network and xcm_test files to test the newly added xcm-related
functions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <kungfukeith11@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sasha Gryaznov <hi@agryaznov.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com>
Adds a `NodeFeatures` bitfield value to the runtime `HostConfiguration`,
with the purpose of coordinating the enabling of node-side features,
such as: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/628 and
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/598.
These are features that require all validators enable them at the same
time, assuming all/most nodes have upgraded their node versions.
This PR doesn't add any feature yet. These are coming in future PRs.
Also adds a runtime API for querying the state of the client features
and an extrinsic for setting/unsetting a feature by its index in the bitfield.
Note: originally part of:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1644, but posted as
standalone to be reused by other PRs until the initial PR is merged
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/106
Port of cumulus PR https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/pull/2960
This PR adds the ability to bid for collator slots even after the max
number of collators have already registered. This eliminates the first
come, first served mechanism that was in place before.
Key changes:
- added `update_bond` extrinsic to allow registered candidates to adjust
their bonds in order to dynamically control their bids
- added `take_candidate_slot` extrinsic to try to replace an already
existing candidate by bidding more than them
- candidates are now kept in a sorted list in the pallet storage, where
the top `DesiredCandidates` out of `MaxCandidates` candidates in the
list will be selected by the session pallet as collators
- if the candidacy bond is increased through a `set_candidacy_bond`
call, candidates which don't meet the new bond requirements are kicked
# Checklist
- [ ] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the
"Description" section above
- [ ] My PR follows the [labeling
requirements](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#process)
of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required)
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if
applicable)
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works (if applicable)
- [ ] If this PR alters any external APIs or interfaces used by
Polkadot, the corresponding Polkadot PR is ready as well as the
corresponding Cumulus PR (optional)
---------
Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io>
## Motivation
`pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality,
including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and
`reserve_transfer_assets()` calls.
While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()`
works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and
beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_.
## Solution
This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to
support transfers when reserves are other chains.
This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset
transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`.
Enables following scenarios:
- transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff
asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases),
- transferring assets with reserve on destination,
- transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff
assets and fees have same remote reserve),
- transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the
asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset
with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains,
even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve,
- transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using
fees which can be teleported between involved chains.
All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having
to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario
and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built
automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and
trusted reserves.
#### Current limitations:
- while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or
fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among
themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly
enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely
increased in the future).
- `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote**
reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more
complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future
holds).
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055
---------
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
We are introducing a new set of `XcmController` traits (final name yet
to be determined).
These traits are implemented by `pallet-xcm` and allows other pallets,
such as `pallet_contracts`, to rely on these traits instead of tight
coupling them to `pallet-xcm`.
Using only the existing Xcm traits would mean duplicating the logic from
`pallet-xcm` in these other pallets, which we aim to avoid. Our
objective is to ensure that when these APIs are called from
`pallet-contracts`, they produce the exact same outcomes as if called
directly from `pallet-xcm`.
The other benefits is that we can also expose return values to
`pallet-contracts` instead of just calling `pallet-xcm` dispatchable and
getting a `DispatchResult` back.
See traits integration in this PR
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1248, where the traits
are used as follow to define and implement `pallet-contracts` Config.
```rs
// Contracts config:
pub trait Config: frame_system::Config {
// ...
/// A type that exposes XCM APIs, allowing contracts to interact with other parachains, and
/// execute XCM programs.
type Xcm: xcm_executor::traits::Controller<
OriginFor<Self>,
<Self as frame_system::Config>::RuntimeCall,
BlockNumberFor<Self>,
>;
}
// implementation
impl pallet_contracts::Config for Runtime {
// ...
type Xcm = pallet_xcm::Pallet<Self>;
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
# Description
We would like to add our bootnodes to the following parachains:
Westend: Westmint, Bridgehub
Kusama: Statemine, Bridgehub
Polkadot: Statemint, Bridgehub, Collectives
Thank you.
---------
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
This PR changes the registration order of the `MessageQueue` pallet so
that it is registered last.
This is necessary so that the
[on_initialize](https://github.com/Snowfork/snowbridge/blob/df8d5da82e517a65fb0858a4f2ead533290336b5/parachain/pallets/outbound-queue/src/lib.rs#L267)
hooks for Snowbridge can run before `MessageQueue` delivers messages
using its own `on_initialize`.
Generally, I think this is preferable regardless of Snowbridge's
particular requirements. Other pallets may want to do housekeeping
before MessageQueue starts delivering messages.
I'm hoping this PR, if accepted, can be included in the same release as
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1246. As otherwise,
changing the order of pallet registration is an ABI-breaking change.
Some legacy tests were mistakenly merged in #1256 for `emulated-integration-tests-common` crate.
This PR fixes the function name `build_genesis_storage` (no need to use `legacy` suffix, even though the genesis is built from `RuntimeGenesisConfig`).
Closes:
- #1383
- Declared chains can be now be imported and reused in a different
crate.
- Chain declaration are now generic over a generic type `N` (the
Network)
- #1389
- Solved #1383, chains and networks declarations can be restructure to
avoid having to compile all chains when running integrations tests where
are not needed.
- Chains are now declared on its own crate (removed from
`integration-tests-common`)
- Networks are now declared on its own crate (removed from
`integration-tests-common`)
- Integration tests will import only the relevant Network crate
- `integration-tests-common` is renamed to
`emulated-integration-tests-common`
All this is necessary to be able to implement what is described here:
https://github.com/paritytech/roadmap/issues/56#issuecomment-1777010553
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
`bridge-hub-westend-runtime` was added to cumulus/parachains, but wasn't
hooked up to xcm-emulator to run tests against it.
This commit addresses that ^.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Squirrel