This PR backports version bumps from release branch
`release-polkadot-v1.6.0` back to `master` and also moved `prdoc` files
related to the release to the appropriate folder
# Note for reviewer
Most changes are just syntax changes necessary for the new version.
Most important files should be the ones under the `xcm` folder.
# Description
Added XCMv4.
## Removed `Multi` prefix
The following types have been renamed:
- MultiLocation -> Location
- MultiAsset -> Asset
- MultiAssets -> Assets
- InteriorMultiLocation -> InteriorLocation
- MultiAssetFilter -> AssetFilter
- VersionedMultiAsset -> VersionedAsset
- WildMultiAsset -> WildAsset
- VersionedMultiLocation -> VersionedLocation
In order to fix a name conflict, the `Assets` in `xcm-executor` were
renamed to `HoldingAssets`, as they represent assets in holding.
## Removed `Abstract` asset id
It was not being used anywhere and this simplifies the code.
Now assets are just constructed as follows:
```rust
let asset: Asset = (AssetId(Location::new(1, Here)), 100u128).into();
```
No need for specifying `Concrete` anymore.
## Outcome is now a named fields struct
Instead of
```rust
pub enum Outcome {
Complete(Weight),
Incomplete(Weight, Error),
Error(Error),
}
```
we now have
```rust
pub enum Outcome {
Complete { used: Weight },
Incomplete { used: Weight, error: Error },
Error { error: Error },
}
```
## Added Reanchorable trait
Now both locations and assets implement this trait, making it easier to
reanchor both.
## New syntax for building locations and junctions
Now junctions are built using the following methods:
```rust
let location = Location {
parents: 1,
interior: [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)].into()
};
```
or
```rust
let location = Location::new(1, [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)]);
```
And they are matched like so:
```rust
match location.unpack() {
(1, [Parachain(id)]) => ...
(0, Here) => ...,
(1, [_]) => ...,
}
```
This syntax is mandatory in v4, and has been also implemented for v2 and
v3 for easier migration.
This was needed to make all sizes smaller.
# TODO
- [x] Scaffold v4
- [x] Port github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7236
- [x] Remove `Multi` prefix
- [x] Remove `Abstract` asset id
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <kungfukeith11@gmail.com>
A recent referendum failed because the parachain's sovereign account had
enough funds for the deposit (the runtime at the time required a
deposit) but not enough left over for the existential deposit, which
must remain free.
The current logic does not require a deposit for channels with system
chains, and the current tests check that none is taken. This new test
simply ensures that even without any balance in a parachain's sovereign
account, opening a channel with a system chain will be successful.
The XCM instruction limit of 100 was being hit by the 1 large message
before. The weight ref time also needed to be bumped for these
extrinsics.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
This PR allows _username authorities_ to issue unique usernames that
correspond with an account. It also provides two-way lookup, that is
from `AccountId` to a single, "primary" `Username` (alongside
`Registration`) and multiple unique `Username`s to an `AccountId`.
Key features:
- Username Authorities added (and removed) via privileged origin.
- Authorities have a `suffix` and an `allocation`. They can grant up to
`allocation` usernames. Their `suffix` will be appended to the usernames
that they issue. A suffix may be up to 7 characters long.
- Users can ask an authority to grant them a username. This will take
the form `myusername.suffix`. The entire name (including suffix) must be
less than or equal to 32 alphanumeric characters.
- Users can approve a username for themselves in one of two ways (that
is, authorities cannot grant them arbitrarily):
- Pre-sign the entire username (including suffix) with a secret key that
corresponds to their `AccountId` (for keyed accounts, obviously); or
- Accept the username after it has been granted by an authority (it will
be queued until accepted) (for non-keyed accounts like pure proxies or
multisigs).
- The system does not require any funds or deposits. Users without an
identity will be given a default one (presumably all fields set to
`None`). If they update this info, they will need to place the normal
storage deposit.
- If a user does not have any username, their first one will be set as
`Primary`, and their `AccountId` will map to that one. If they get
subsequent usernames, they can choose which one to be their primary via
`set_primary_username`.
- There are some state cleanup functions to remove expired usernames
that have not been accepted and dangling usernames whose owners have
called `clear_identity`.
TODO:
- [x] Add migration to runtimes
- [x] Probably do off-chain migration into People Chain genesis
- [x] Address a few TODO questions in code (please review)
---------
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <g6pestana@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <donal.murray@parity.io>
Also fixes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1417
- [x] CoreIndex -> AssignmentProvider mapping will be able to change any
time.
- [x] Implement
- [x] Provide Migrations
- [x] Add and fix tests
- [x] Implement bulk assigner logic
- [x] bulk assigner tests
- [x] Port over current assigner to use bulk designer (+ share on-demand
with bulk): top-level assigner has core ranges: legacy, bulk
- [x] Adjust migrations to reflect new assigner structure
- [x] Move migration code to Assignment code directly and make it
recursive (make it possible to skip releases) -> follow up ticket.
- [x] Test migrations
- [x] Add migration PR to runtimes repo -> follow up ticket.
- [x] Wire up with actual UMP messages
- [x] Write PR docs
---------
Co-authored-by: eskimor <eskimor@no-such-url.com>
Co-authored-by: Bradley Olson <34992650+BradleyOlson64@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BradleyOlson64 <lotrftw9@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson <antonva@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: antonva <anton.asgeirsson@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <marcin@realemail.net>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <info@kchr.de>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Many clippy lints usually enforced by `-Dcomplexity` and `-Dcorrectness`
are not caught by CI as they are gated by `features`, like
`runtime-benchmarks`, while the clippy CI job runs with only the default
features for all targets.
This PR also adds a CI step to run clippy with `--all-features` to
ensure the code quality is maintained behind feature gates from now on.
To improve local development, clippy lints are downgraded to warnings,
but they still will result in an error at CI due to the `-Dwarnings`
rustflag.
---------
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Adds the `authorize_upgrade` -> `enact_authorized_upgrade` pattern to
`frame-system`. This will be useful for upgrading bridged chains that
are under the governance of Polkadot without passing entire runtime Wasm
blobs over a bridge.
Notes:
- Changed `enact_authorized_upgrade` to `apply_authorized_upgrade`.
Personal opinion, "apply" more accurately expresses what it's doing. Can
change back if outvoted.
- Remove `check_version` in favor of two extrinsics, so as to make
_checked_ the default.
- Left calls in `parachain-system` and marked as deprecated to prevent
breaking the API. They just call into the `frame-system` functions.
- Updated `frame-system` benchmarks to v2 syntax.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/78.
Removes `BetterUnsignedThreshold` from pallet EPM. This will essentially
mean any solution submitted by the validator that is strictly better
than the current queued solution would be accepted.
The reason for having these thresholds is to limit number of solutions
submitted on-chain. However for unsigned submissions, the number of
solutions that could be submitted on average is limited even without
thresholding (calculation shown in the corresponding issue).
This PR adds [Rococo
People](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281) <> [Rococo
Bulletin](https://github.com/zdave-parity/polkadot-bulletin-chain) to
the Rococo Bridge Hub code. There's a couple of things left to do here:
- [x] add remaining tests - it'd need some refactoring in the
`bridge-hub-test-utils` - will do in a separate PR;
- [x] actually run benchmarks for new messaging pallet (do we have bot
nowadays?).
The reason why I'm opening it before this ^^^ is ready, is that I'd like
to hear others opinion on how to deal with hacks with that bridge.
Initially I was assuming that Rococo Bulletin will be the 1:1 copy of
the Polkadot Bulletin (to avoid maintaining multiple
runtimes/releases/...), so you can see many `PolkadotBulletin` mentions
in this PR, even though we are going to bridge with the parallel chain
(`RococoBulletin`). That's because e.g. pallet names from
`construct_runtime` are affecting runtime storage keys and bridges are
using runtime storage proofs => it is important to use names that the
Bulletin chain expects.
But in the end, this hack won't work - we can't use Polkadot Bulletin
runtime to bridge with Rococo Bridge Hub, because Polkadot Bulletin
expects Polkadot Bridge hub to use `1002` parachain id and Rococo Bridge
Hub seats on the `1013`. This also affects storage keys using in
bridging, so I had to add the [`rococo`
feature](https://github.com/svyatonik/polkadot-bulletin-chain/blob/add-bridge-pallets/runtime/Cargo.toml#L198)
to the Bulletin chain. So now we can actually alter its runtime and
adapt it for Rococo.
So the question here is - what's better for us here
- to leave everything as is (seems hacky and non-trivial);
- change Bulletin chain runtime when `rococo` feature is used - e.g. use
proper names there (`WithPolkadotGrandpa` -> `WithRococoGrandpa`, ...)
- add another set of pallets to the Bulletin chain runtime to bridge
with Rococo and never use them in production. Similar to hack that we
had in Rococo/Wococo
cc @acatangiu @bkontur @serban300
also cc @joepetrowski as the main "client" of this bridge
---
A couple words on how this bridge is different from the Rococo <>
Westend bridge:
- it is a bridge with a chain that uses GRANDPA finality, not the
parachain finality (hence the tests needs to be changed);
- it is a fee-free bridge. So
`AllowExplicitUnpaidExecutionFrom<Equals<SiblingPeople>>` + we are not
paying any rewards to relayers (apart from compensating transaction
costs).
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Egor_P <egor@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
In the move from the old `Currency` traits to the new `fungible/s`
family of traits, we already had the `FungiblesAdapter` and
`NonFungiblesAdapter` for multiple fungible and non fungible assets
respectively. However, for handling only one fungible asset, we were
missing a `FungibleAdapter`, and so used the old `CurrencyAdapter`
instead. This PR aims to fill in that gap, and provide the new adapter
for more updated examples.
I marked the old `CurrencyAdapter` as deprecated as part of this PR, and
I'll change it to the new `FungibleAdapter` in a following PR.
The two stages are separated so as to not bloat this PR with some name
fixes in tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
We currently use a bit of a hack in `.cargo/config` to make sure that
clippy isn't too annoying by specifying the list of lints.
There is now a stable way to define lints for a workspace. The only down
side is that every crate seems to have to opt into this so there's a
*few* files modified in this PR.
Dependencies:
- [x] PR that upgrades CI to use rust 1.74 is merged.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Initial implementation for the plan discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/701
Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178
v0: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7554,
## Overall idea
When approval-voting checks a candidate and is ready to advertise the
approval, defer it in a per-relay chain block until we either have
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT candidates to sign or a candidate has stayed
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS in the queue, in both cases we sign what
candidates we have available.
This should allow us to reduce the number of approvals messages we have
to create/send/verify. The parameters are configurable, so we should
find some values that balance:
- Security of the network: Delaying broadcasting of an approval
shouldn't but the finality at risk and to make sure that never happens
we won't delay sending a vote if we are past 2/3 from the no-show time.
- Scalability of the network: MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT = 1 &
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS =0, is what we have now and we know from
the measurements we did on versi, it bottlenecks
approval-distribution/approval-voting when increase significantly the
number of validators and parachains
- Block storage: In case of disputes we have to import this votes on
chain and that increase the necessary storage with
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT * CandidateHash per vote. Given that
disputes are not the normal way of the network functioning and we will
limit MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT in the single digits numbers, this
should be good enough. Alternatively, we could try to create a better
way to store this on-chain through indirection, if that's needed.
## Other fixes:
- Fixed the fact that we were sending random assignments to
non-validators, that was wrong because those won't do anything with it
and they won't gossip it either because they do not have a grid topology
set, so we would waste the random assignments.
- Added metrics to be able to debug potential no-shows and
mis-processing of approvals/assignments.
## TODO:
- [x] Get feedback, that this is moving in the right direction. @ordian
@sandreim @eskimor @burdges, let me know what you think.
- [x] More and more testing.
- [x] Test in versi.
- [x] Make MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT &
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_WAIT_MILLIS a parachain host configuration.
- [x] Make sure the backwards compatibility works correctly
- [x] Make sure this direction is compatible with other streams of work:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/635 &
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/742
- [x] Final versi burn-in before merging
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <alexandru.gheorghe@parity.io>
This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved
in a release and build:
- the changelog
- a simple draft of audience documentation
Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version
1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file.
This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content
allowing to properly generate the changelog.
The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience
documentation.
The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when
all PR come with a proper `prdoc`.
## Assumptions
- the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under
`prdoc/X.Y.Z`
- the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author +
topic. Thos fields are optional.
The build script can be called as:
```
VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh
```
Related:
- #1408
---------
Co-authored-by: EgorPopelyaev <egor@parity.io>
Partially Addresses #2500
Adds a `deprecate_controller_batch` call to the staking pallet that is
callable by `Root` and `StakingAdmin`. To be used for controller account
deprecation and removed thereafter. Adds
`MaxControllersDeprecationBatch` pallet constant that defines max
possible deprecations per call.
- [x] Add `deprecate_controller_batch` call, and
`MaxControllersInDeprecationBatch` constant.
- [x] Add tests, benchmark, weights. Tests that weight is only consumed
if unique pair.
- [x] Adds `StakingAdmin` origin to staking's `AdminOrigin` type in
westend runtime.
- [x] Determined that worst case 5,900 deprecations does fit into
`maxBlock` `proofSize` and `refTime` in both normal and operational
thresholds, meaning we can deprecate all controllers for each network in
one call.
## Block Weights
By querying `consts.system.blockWeights` we can see that the
`deprecate_controller_batch` weights fit within the `normal` threshold
on Polkadot.
#### `controller_deprecation_batch` where i = 5900:
#### Ref time: 69,933,325,300
#### Proof size: 21,040,390
### Polkadot
```
// consts.query.blockWeights
maxBlock: {
refTime: 2,000,000,000,000
proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
}
normal: {
maxExtrinsic: {
refTime: 1,479,873,955,000
proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195
}
maxTotal: {
refTime: 1,500,000,000,000
proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711
}
}
```
### Kusama
```
// consts.query.blockWeights
maxBlock: {
refTime: 2,000,000,000,000
proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
}
normal: {
maxExtrinsic: {
refTime: 1,479,875,294,000
proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195
}
maxTotal: {
refTime: 1,500,000,000,000
proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <g6pestana@gmail.com>
This PR makes the block number provider configurable through the Config
trait in pallet-vesting, this gives parachains the option to use the
relay chain block number provider from ParachainSystem.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Treasury Pallet Instance for the Fellowship in Westend Collectives.
In this update, we present a Treasury Pallet Instance that is under the
control of the Fellowship body, with oversight from the Root and
Treasurer origins. Here's how it is governed:
- the Root origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
proposals, with no amount limit for approvals.
- the Treasurer origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
proposals, with approval limits of up to 10,000,000 DOT.
- Voice of all Fellows ranked at 3 or above can reject or approve spend
proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000 DOT.
- Voice of Fellows ranked at 4 or above can also reject or approve spend
proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000,000 DOT.
Additionally, we introduce the Asset Rate Pallet Instance to establish
conversion rates from asset A to B. This is used to determine if a
proposed spend amount involving a non-native asset is permissible by the
commanding origin. The rates can be set up by the Root, Treasurer
origins, or Voice of all Fellows.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <joe@parity.io>
Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2319
Changes:
- Ensure that only `enqueue_message(s)` is callable from within the
message processor. This prevents messed up storage that can currently
happen when the pallet is called into recursively.
- Use `H256` instead of `[u8; 32]` for clearer API.
## Details
The re-entracy check is done with the `environmental` crate by adding a
`with_service_mutex(f)` function that runs the closure exclusively. This
works since the MQ pallet is not instantiable.
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
As suggested in this thread:
https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/87#discussion_r1400237122
We already have the `IsChildSystemParachain`, which may be used at relay
chain, but it can't be used at a parachain level. So let's use
`AllSiblingSystemParachains` for that. I was thinking about
`AllSystemParachains`, but it may cause wrong impression that it can be
used at a relay chain level.
---------
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
# Motivation (+testing)
### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm`
We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
needing to teleport some non-fee asset?
This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
user.
This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
(the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
between said parachain and AssetHub).
Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.
# Description
Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
transfers for all `assets` including fees.
Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
`assets` including fees.
For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.
`assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
be teleportable to `dest`.
No limitations imposed on `fees`.
- for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
`beneficiary`.
- for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
## Review notes
Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and
adds CI to keep them tidy.
If people want we can customise the format rules as described here
https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html
@ggwpez, I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are
propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and
conflicts.
TODO
- [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet
tests instead of deleting the dir
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Follow up to fix a bug from #1814 discovered in XCM emulator testing.
I mistakenly thought that checking out an asset would withdraw it from
the sender. This actually withdraws the asset before checking out.
---------
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Addresses #409.
This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability
for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission
claiming:
> Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for
claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless?
This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends
`do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the
`Commission` struct, configured by an enum:
```
enum CommissionClaimPermission {
Permissionless,
Account(AccountId),
}
```
This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's
`commission.claim_permission` field:
```
struct BondedPool {
commission: {
<snip>
claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>,
},
<snip>
}
```
This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing
pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root`
role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is
the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None`
again.
#### Changes
- [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field.
- [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`.
- [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call.
- [x] Test to cover new configs and call.
- [x] Add and amend benchmarks.
- [x] Generate new weights + slot into call
`set_commission_claim_permission`.
- [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump
storage version.
- [x] Update Westend weights.
- [x] Migration working.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
## Overview
This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent
changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142)
made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes.
It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`.
## Details
During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the
`spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on
version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`.
With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number
(still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as
`01_02_003`.
This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the
fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Deprecates `RewardDestination::Controller` variant.
- [x] `RewardDestination::Controller` annotated with `#[deprecated]`.
- [x] `Controller` variant is now handled the same way as `Stash` in
`payout_stakers`.
- [x] `set_payee` errors if `RewardDestination::Controller` is provided.
- [x] Added `update_payee` call to lazily migrate
`RewardDestination::Controller` `Payee` storage entries to
`RewardDestination::Account(controller)` .
- [x] `payout_stakers_dead_controller` has been removed from benches &
weights - was not used.
- [x] Tests no longer use `RewardDestination::Controller`.
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <g6pestana@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <52418509+georgepisaltu@users.noreply.github.com>
Hey guys, as discussed I've changed the name to a more general one
`PvfExecKind`, is this good or too general?
Creating this as a draft, I still have to fix the tests.
Closes#1585
Kusama address: FkB6QEo8VnV3oifugNj5NeVG3Mvq1zFbrUu4P5YwRoe5mQN
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Marcin S <marcin@realemail.net>
Westend now successfully updated to `spec: 103000`, we **have to
remove** the session keys migration before the next release as it
doesn't gracefully handle reapplying it.
The goal of this PR is to migrate Identity deposits from the Relay Chain
to a system parachain.
The problem I want to solve is that `IdentityOf` and `SubsOf` both store
an amount that's held in reserve as a storage deposit. When migrating to
a parachain, we can take a snapshot of the actual `IdentityInfo` and
sub-account mappings, but should migrate (off chain) the `deposit`s to
zero, since the chain (and by extension, accounts) won't have any funds
at genesis.
The good news is that we expect parachain deposits to be significantly
lower (possibly 100x) on the parachain. That is, a deposit of 21 DOT on
the Relay Chain would need 0.21 DOT on a parachain. This PR proposes to
migrate the deposits in the following way:
1. Introduces a new pallet with two extrinsics:
- `reap_identity`: Has a configurable `ReapOrigin`, which would be set
to `EnsureSigned` on the Relay Chain (i.e. callable by anyone) and
`EnsureRoot` on the parachain (we don't want identities reaped from
there).
- `poke_deposit`: Checks what deposit the pallet holds (at genesis,
zero) and attempts to update the amount based on the calculated deposit
for storage data.
2. `reap_identity` clears all storage data for a `target` account and
unreserves their deposit.
3. A `ReapIdentityHandler` teleports the necessary DOT to the parachain
and calls `poke_deposit`. Since the parachain deposit is much lower, and
was just unreserved, we know we have enough.
One awkwardness I ran into was that the XCMv3 instruction set does not
provide a way for the system to teleport assets without a fee being
deducted on reception. Users shouldn't have to pay a fee for the system
to migrate their info to a more efficient location. So I wrote my own
program and did the `InitiateTeleport` accounting on my own to send a
program with `UnpaidExecution`. Have discussed an
`InitiateUnpaidTeleport` instruction with @franciscoaguirre . Obviously
any chain executing this would have to pass a `Barrier` for free
execution.
TODO:
- [x] Confirm People Chain ParaId
- [x] Confirm People Chain deposit rates (determined in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281)
- [x] Add pallet to Westend
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Tsvetomir Dimitrov