Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and
adds CI to keep them tidy.
If people want we can customise the format rules as described here
https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html
@ggwpez, I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are
propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and
conflicts.
TODO
- [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet
tests instead of deleting the dir
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
The `xcm` crate was renamed to `staging-xcm` to be able to publish it to
crates.io as someone as squatted `xcm`. The problem with this rename is
that the `TypeInfo` includes the crate name which ultimately lands in
the metadata. The metadata is consumed by downstream users like
`polkadot-js` or people building on top of `polkadot-js`. These people
are using the entire `path` to find the type in the type registry. Thus,
their code would break as the type path would now be [`staging_xcm`,
`VersionedXcm`] instead of [`xcm`, `VersionedXcm`]. This pull request
fixes this by renaming the path segment `staging_xcm` to `xcm`.
This requires: https://github.com/paritytech/scale-info/pull/197
---------
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
* Fix std, runtime-benchmarks and try-runtime features
zepter lint propagate-feature --feature try-runtime --left-side-feature-missing=ignore --workspace --fix --feature-enables-dep="try-runtime:frame-try-runtime"
zepter lint propagate-feature --feature runtime-benchmarks --left-side-feature-missing=ignore --workspace --fix --feature-enables-dep="runtime-benchmarks:frame-benchmarking"
zepter lint propagate-feature --feature std --left-side-feature-missing=ignore --workspace --fix
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Add propagate feature CI check
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Test CI by adding an error
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Use --locked
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Add help msg
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Revert "Test CI by adding an error"
This reverts commit cf4ff6cc0632269b0a109e547686e5e3314b02de.
* Test CI by adding an error
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* No newline in help msg
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Revert "Test CI by adding an error"
This reverts commit 5daa06ada8e01f5bebafb9d1c76804dd79bc1006.
* Test CI by adding an error
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Revert "Test CI by adding an error"
This reverts commit ca15de5729507a564f140a10ec2e87b19516ec4c.
* Fix msg
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Revert back to master
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Re-do with Zepter v0.7.4
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Update Zepter to 0.7.4
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Disable rococo try-runtime check
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
* More review fixes
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
* Upgraded dependencies
* Adapting code to scale v3
* Empty commit to trigger CI
* Triggering CI
* Fixing UI test
* Remove superfluous dev-dep added by #9228
* Cryout for CI
* Introduce `SecretUri`
* `inspect-key`: Adds support for `expect-public`
`expect-public` can be used to check that a given secret uri corresponds to the given public key.
This is mainly useful when the secret uri is protected by a password and a new derived account
should be generated. With `--expect-public` the user can pass the public key/account-id of the
"base" secret uri aka the one without any derivation to ensure the correct password was inserted.
* Fixes
* 🤦
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
* Review feedback
* FMT
* Bump the versions
Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
Liam Aharon