4 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Marcin S	2efa3bab98	pre-checking: Reject failed PVFs (#6492) ... * pre-checking: Reject failed PVFs * paras: immediately reject any PVF that cannot reach a supermajority * Make the `quorum` reject condition a bit more clear semantically * Add comment * Update implementer's guide * Update a link Not related to the rest of the PR, but I randomly noticed and fixed this. * Update runtime/parachains/src/paras/tests.rs Co-authored-by: s0me0ne-unkn0wn <48632512+s0me0ne-unkn0wn@users.noreply.github.com> * Remove unneeded loop * Log PVF retries using `info!` * Change retry logs to `warn!` and add preparation failure log * Log PVF execution failure * Clarify why we reject failed PVFs * Fix PVF reject runtime benchmarks Co-authored-by: s0me0ne-unkn0wn <48632512+s0me0ne-unkn0wn@users.noreply.github.com>	2023-01-12 09:24:42 +00:00
Marcin S	1f8219767e	PVF timeouts follow-up (#6151) ... * Rename timeout consts and timeout parameter; bump leniency * Update implementor's guide with info about PVFs * Make glossary a bit easier to read * Add a note to LENIENT_PREPARATION_TIMEOUT * Remove PVF-specific section from glossary * Fix some typos	2022-11-01 10:59:53 -04:00
Marcin S	17730b85be	Separate preparation timeouts for PVF prechecking and execution (#6139) ... * Add some documentation * Add `compilation_timeout` parameter for PVF preparation job * Update buckets in prometheus metrics * Update prepare/queue tests * Update pvf-prechecking overview in implementer docs * Fix some CI checks	2022-10-13 11:00:57 +00:00
Sergei Shulepov	1394b70d49	pvf-precheck: update implementers' guide (#4612) ... This commit incorporates the changes made to the runtime in the following PRs: - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/4408 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/4457 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/4540 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/4542 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/4581 Note that this PR does not include the description of the PVF pre-checker subsystem. This should be addressed within https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/4611 Co-authored-by: sandreim <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>	2021-12-29 14:32:08 +01:00