* Use an actual Result inside MessageDispatchResult
We need this in order to distinguish between Ok and Err
* Revert #1660
* Fixes + simplifications
* Implement review suggestions
* removed FromBridgedChainMessageDispatch in favor of XcmBlobMessageDispatch
* use HaulBlobExporter/HaulBlobExporterAdapter instead of XcmBridge/XcmBridgeAdapter
* tests for sending/dispatching messages
* use new schema in testnet bridges + some cleanup
* clippy
* spelling + added TODO
* cleanup some checks
* benchmarks compilation
* all is XCM
* updated README.md
* ref issue from TODO
**Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.
**This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
repository.**
Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:
- `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`
- `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`
- `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
tracing`
Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
commits for easier reviewing:
- `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'children'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'until'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'indices'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'committed'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'topology'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'response'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'network'`
Let me know if this structure is adequate.
**Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`,
`Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it
as it is.
~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to
message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left
it as it is.~~
~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the
more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~
~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the
correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~
**Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs
`judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc.
are both present in different places, but I suppose that's
understandable given the number of contributors.
~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it
triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it
is.~~
# Note for reviewer
Most changes are just syntax changes necessary for the new version.
Most important files should be the ones under the `xcm` folder.
# Description
Added XCMv4.
## Removed `Multi` prefix
The following types have been renamed:
- MultiLocation -> Location
- MultiAsset -> Asset
- MultiAssets -> Assets
- InteriorMultiLocation -> InteriorLocation
- MultiAssetFilter -> AssetFilter
- VersionedMultiAsset -> VersionedAsset
- WildMultiAsset -> WildAsset
- VersionedMultiLocation -> VersionedLocation
In order to fix a name conflict, the `Assets` in `xcm-executor` were
renamed to `HoldingAssets`, as they represent assets in holding.
## Removed `Abstract` asset id
It was not being used anywhere and this simplifies the code.
Now assets are just constructed as follows:
```rust
let asset: Asset = (AssetId(Location::new(1, Here)), 100u128).into();
```
No need for specifying `Concrete` anymore.
## Outcome is now a named fields struct
Instead of
```rust
pub enum Outcome {
Complete(Weight),
Incomplete(Weight, Error),
Error(Error),
}
```
we now have
```rust
pub enum Outcome {
Complete { used: Weight },
Incomplete { used: Weight, error: Error },
Error { error: Error },
}
```
## Added Reanchorable trait
Now both locations and assets implement this trait, making it easier to
reanchor both.
## New syntax for building locations and junctions
Now junctions are built using the following methods:
```rust
let location = Location {
parents: 1,
interior: [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)].into()
};
```
or
```rust
let location = Location::new(1, [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)]);
```
And they are matched like so:
```rust
match location.unpack() {
(1, [Parachain(id)]) => ...
(0, Here) => ...,
(1, [_]) => ...,
}
```
This syntax is mandatory in v4, and has been also implemented for v2 and
v3 for easier migration.
This was needed to make all sizes smaller.
# TODO
- [x] Scaffold v4
- [x] Port github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7236
- [x] Remove `Multi` prefix
- [x] Remove `Abstract` asset id
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <kungfukeith11@gmail.com>
## Summary
This pull request proposes a solution for improved control of the
versioned XCM flow over the bridge (across different consensus chains)
and resolves the situation where the sending chain/consensus has already
migrated to a higher XCM version than the receiving chain/consensus.
## Problem/Motivation
The current flow over the bridge involves a transfer from AssetHubRococo
(AHR) to BridgeHubRococo (BHR) to BridgeHubWestend (BHW) and finally to
AssetHubWestend (AHW), beginning with a reserve-backed transfer on AHR.
In this process:
1. AHR sends XCM `ExportMessage` through `XcmpQueue`, incorporating XCM
version checks using the `WrapVersion` feature, influenced by
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion` (managed by
`pallet_xcm::force_xcm_version` or version discovery).
2. BHR handles the `ExportMessage` instruction, utilizing the latest XCM
version. The `HaulBlobExporter` converts the inner XCM to
[`VersionedXcm::from`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/63ac2471aa0210f0ac9903bdd7d8f9351f9a635f/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465-L467),
also using the latest XCM version.
However, challenges arise:
- Incompatibility when BHW uses a different version than BHR. For
instance, if BHR migrates to **XCMv4** while BHW remains on **XCMv3**,
BHR's `VersionedXcm::from` uses `VersionedXcm::V4` variant, causing
encoding issues for BHW.
```
/// Just a simulation of possible error, which could happen on BHW
/// (this code is based on actual master without XCMv4)
let encoded = hex_literal::hex!("0400");
println!("{:?}", VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(&mut &encoded[..]));
Err(Error { cause: None, desc: "Could not decode `VersionedXcm`, variant
doesn't exist" })
```
- Similar compatibility issues exist between AHR and AHW.
## Solution
This pull request introduces the following solutions:
1. **New trait `CheckVersion`** - added to the `xcm` module and exposing
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`. This enhancement allows checking the
actual XCM version for desired destinations outside of the `pallet_xcm`
module.
2. **Version Check in `HaulBlobExporter`** uses `CheckVersion` to check
known/configured destination versions, ensuring compatibility. For
example, in the scenario mentioned, BHR can store the version `3` for
BHW. If BHR is on XCMv4, it will attempt to downgrade the message to
version `3` instead of using the latest version `4`.
3. **Version Check in `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`** - this check
ensures compatibility with the real destination's XCM version,
preventing the unnecessary sending of messages to the local bridge hub
if versions are incompatible.
These additions aim to improve the control and compatibility of XCM
flows over the bridge and addressing issues related to version
mismatches.
## Possible alternative solution
_(More investigation is needed, and at the very least, it should extend
to XCMv4/5. If this proves to be a viable option, I can open an RFC for
XCM.)._
Add the `XcmVersion` attribute to the `ExportMessage` so that the
sending chain can determine, based on what is stored in
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`, the version the destination is using.
This way, we may not need to handle the version in `HaulBlobExporter`.
```
ExportMessage {
network: NetworkId,
destination: InteriorMultiLocation,
xcm: Xcm<()>
destination_xcm_version: Version, // <- new attritbute
},
```
```
pub trait ExportXcm {
fn validate(
network: NetworkId,
channel: u32,
universal_source: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
destination: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
message: &mut Option<Xcm<()>>,
destination_xcm_version: Version, , // <- new attritbute
) -> SendResult<Self::Ticket>;
```
## Future Directions
This PR does not fix version discovery over bridge, further
investigation will be conducted here:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2417.
## TODO
- [x] `pallet_xcm` mock for tests uses hard-coded XCM version `2` -
change to 3 or lastest?
- [x] fix `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`
- [x] fix HaulBlobExporter with version determination
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/2183669d05f9b510f979a0cc3c7847707bacba2e/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465)
- [x] add unit-tests to the runtimes
- [x] run benchmarks for `ExportMessage`
- [x] extend local run scripts about `force_xcm_version(dest, version)`
- [ ] when merged, prepare governance calls for Rococo/Westend
- [ ] add PRDoc
Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2719
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Serban Iorga