* BEEFY: generate historical proofs
Signed-off-by: Serban Iorga <serban@parity.io>
* cargo update -p sp-io
* Properly set max proof size for runtimes
* Properly set max proof size for mocks
* cargo fmt
* Set appropriate UMP service total proof size weight
* Disable zombienet-tests-parachains-disputes CI
* Add comment explaining weight math
* Use MAX_POV_SIZE for max proof size
* Cast to u64
* Remove comment
Signed-off-by: Serban Iorga <serban@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <kungfukeith11@gmail.com>
* remove history depth from storage and add it as config for pallet staking
* add migration to v11 for staking pallet
* revert local substrate dependency patch
* remove history depth from storage and add it as config for pallet staking
* add migration to v11 for staking pallet
* revert local substrate dependency patch
* update substrate dependencies
* update cargo lock
* update to latest substrate
* revert all changes to Cargo.lock
* cargo update -p sp-io
* mark migration job as failable
Co-authored-by: kianenigma <kian@parity.io>
* Add `DisputeState` to `DisputeCoordinatorMessage::RecentDisputes`
The new signature of the message is:
```
RecentDisputes(oneshot::Sender<Vec<(SessionIndex, CandidateHash, DisputeStatus)>>),
```
As part of the change also add `DispiteStatus` to
`polkadot_node_primitives`.
* Move dummy_signature() in primitives/test-helpers
* Enable staging runtime api on Rococo
* Implementation
* Move disputes to separate module
* Vote prioritisation
* Duplicates handling
* Double vote handling
* Unit tests
* Logs and metrics
* Code review feedback
* Fix ACTIVE/INACTIVE separation and update partition names
* Add `fn dispute_is_inactive` to node primitives and refactor `fn get_active_with_status()` logic
* Keep the 'old' logic if the staging api is not enabled
* Fix some comments in tests
* Add warning message if there are any inactive_unknown_onchain disputes
* Add file headers and remove `use super::*;` usage outside tests
* Adding doc comments
* Fix test methods names
* Fix staging api usage
* Fix `get_disputes` runtime function implementation
* Fix compilation error
* Fix arithmetic operations in tests
* Use smaller test data
* Rename `RuntimeApiRequest::StagingDisputes` to `RuntimeApiRequest::Disputes`
* Remove `staging-client` feature flag
* fmt
* Remove `vstaging` feature flag
* Some comments regarding the staging api
* Rename dispute selection modules in provisioner
with_staging_api -> prioritized_selection
without_staging_api -> random_selection
* Comments for staging api
* Comments
* Additional logging
* Code review feedback
process_selected_disputes -> into_multi_dispute_statement_set
typo
In trait VoteType: vote_value -> is_valid
* Code review feedback
* Fix metrics
* get_disputes -> disputes
* Get time only once during partitioning
* Fix partitioning
* Comments
* Reduce the number of hardcoded api versions
* Code review feedback
* Unused import
* Comments
* More precise log messages
* Code review feedback
* Code review feedback
* Code review feedback - remove `trait VoteType`
* Code review feedback
* Trace log for DisputeCoordinatorMessage::QueryCandidateVotes counter in vote_selection
* Enable correct features
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* Feature gate function
The expose_db function is currently feature gated with runtime-benchmarks.
After the related Substrate MR, this feature gate will actually *work*
as intended instead of doing nothing.
BUT then we also have to pass through the correct feature, hence this MR.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* update lockfile for {"substrate"}
* Fix bench features
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
* fix more features
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
* Remove CanAuthorWith trait
CanAuthotWith trait removed. Also all dependencies, parameters, type
paramers were removed. This is related to removal of native runtime.
* update lockfile for {"substrate"}
* Ensure we use unique directories after the recent change to `new_temp_dir`
Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <info@kchr.de>
* Adjust to the new API
* Remove mutability
* Async constructor
* unwrap result
* do not panic
* suggestion
* leftover
* update lockfile for {"substrate"}
Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
* Use new ProtocolName in peer_set.rs
* Use new ProtocolName for request-response protocols
* Use new ProtocolName in polkadot-network-bridge
* Import and conversion fixes
* Use ProtocolName re-exported in sc_network
* update lockfile for {"substrate"}
Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
* Bump crate versions
* Bump spec_version to 9280 for kusama
* Bump spec_version to 9280 for polkadot
* Bump spec_version to 9280 for rococo
* Bump spec_version to 9280 for westend
* update Cargo.lock
Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
* Don't import backing statements directly
into the dispute coordinator. This also gets rid of a redundant
signature check. Both should have some impact on backing performance.
In general this PR should make us scale better in the number of parachains.
Reasoning (aka why this is fine):
For the signature check: As mentioned, it is a redundant check. The
signature has already been checked at this point. This is even made
obvious by the used types. The smart constructor is not perfect as
discussed [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/3455),
but is still a reasonable security.
For not importing to the dispute-coordinator: This should be good as the
dispute coordinator does scrape backing votes from chain. This suffices
in practice as a super majority of validators must have seen a backing
fork in order for a candidate to get included and only included
candidates pose a threat to our system. The import from chain is
preferable over direct import of backing votes for two reasons:
1. The import is batched, greatly improving import performance. All
backing votes for a candidate are imported with a single import.
And indeed we were able to see in metrics that importing votes
from chain is fast.
2. We do less work in general as not every candidate for which
statements are gossiped might actually make it on a chain. The
dispute coordinator as with the current implementation would still
import and keep those votes around for six sessions.
While redundancy is good for reliability in the event of bugs, this also
comes at a non negligible cost. The dispute-coordinator right now is the
subsystem with the highest load, despite the fact that it should not be
doing much during mormal operation and it is only getting worse
with more parachains as the load is a direct function of the number of statements.
We'll see on Versi how much of a performance improvement this PR
* Get rid of dead code.
* Dont send approval vote
* Make it pass CI
* Bring back tests for fixing them later.
* Explicit signature check.
* Resurrect approval-voting tests (not fixed yet)
* Send out approval votes in dispute-distribution.
Use BTreeMap for ordered dispute votes.
* Bring back an important warning.
* Fix approval voting tests.
* Don't send out dispute message on import + test
+ Some cleanup.
* Guide changes.
Note that the introduced complexity is actually redundant.
* WIP: guide changes.
* Finish guide changes about dispute-coordinator
conceputally. Requires more proof read still.
Also removed obsolete implementation details, where the code is better
suited as the source of truth.
* Finish guide changes for now.
* Remove own approval vote import logic.
* Implement logic for retrieving approval-votes
into approval-voting and approval-distribution subsystems.
* Update roadmap/implementers-guide/src/node/disputes/dispute-coordinator.md
Co-authored-by: asynchronous rob <rphmeier@gmail.com>
* Review feedback.
In particular: Add note about disputes of non included candidates.
* Incorporate Review Remarks
* Get rid of superfluous space.
* Tidy up import logic a bit.
Logical vote import is now separated, making the code more readable and
maintainable.
Also: Accept import if there is at least one invalid signer that has not
exceeded its spam slots, instead of requiring all of them to not exceed
their limits. This is more correct and a preparation for vote batching.
* We don't need/have empty imports.
* Fix tests and bugs.
* Remove error prone redundancy.
* Import approval votes on dispute initiated/concluded.
* Add test for approval vote import.
* Make guide checker happy (hopefully)
* Another sanity check + better logs.
* Reasoning about boundedness.
* Use `CandidateIndex` as opposed to `CoreIndex`.
* Remove redundant import.
* Review remarks.
* Add metric for calls to request signatures
* More review remarks.
* Add metric on imported approval votes.
* Include candidate hash in logs.
* More trace log
* Break cycle.
* Add some tracing.
* Cleanup allowed messages.
* fmt
* Tracing + timeout for get inherent data.
* Better error.
* Break cycle in all places.
* Clarified comment some more.
* Typo.
* Break cycle approval-distribution - approval-voting.
Co-authored-by: asynchronous rob <rphmeier@gmail.com>
dependabot[bot]