This PR introduces changes enabling the transfer of coretime regions via
XCM.
TL;DR: There are two primary issues that are resolved in this PR:
1. The `mint` and `burn` functions were not implemented for coretime
regions. These operations are essential for moving assets to and from
the XCM holding register.
2. The transfer of non-fungible assets through XCM was previously
disallowed. This was due to incorrectly benchmarking non-fungible asset
transfers via XCM, which led to assigning it a weight of `Weight::Max`,
effectively preventing its execution.
### `mint_into` and `burn` implementation
This PR addresses the issue with cross-chain transferring regions back
to the Coretime chain. Remote reserve transfers are performed by
withdrawing and depositing the asset to and from the holding registry.
This requires the asset to support burning and minting functionality.
This PR adds burning and minting; however, they work a bit differently
than usual so that the associated region record is not lost when
burning. Instead of removing all the data, burning will set the owner of
the region to `None`, and when minting it back, it will set it to an
actual value. So, when cross-chain transferring, withdrawing into the
registry will remove the region from its original owner, and when
depositing it from the registry, it will set its owner to another
account
This was originally implemented in this PR: #3455, however we decided to
move all of it to this single PR
(https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3455#discussion_r1547324892)
### Fixes made in this PR
- Update the `XcmReserveTransferFilter` on coretime chain since it is
meant as a reserve chain for coretime regions.
- Update the XCM benchmark to use `AssetTransactor` instead of assuming
`pallet-balances` for fungible transfers.
- Update the XCM benchmark to properly measure weight consumption for
nonfungible reserve asset transfers. ATM reserve transfers via the
extrinsic do not work since the weight for it is set to `Weight::max()`.
Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/865
---------
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <donalm@seadanda.dev>
Introduce types to define 1:1 balance conversion for different relative
asset ids/locations of native asset.
Examples:
native asset on Asset Hub presented as `VersionedLocatableAsset` type in
the context of Relay Chain is
```
{
`location`: (0, Parachain(1000)),
`asset_id`: (1, Here),
}
```
and it's balance should be converted 1:1 by implementations of
`ConversionToAssetBalance` trait.
---------
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
This PR mainly removes `xcm::v3` stuff from `assets-common` to make it
more generic and facilitate the transition to newer XCM versions. Some
of the implementations here used hard-coded `xcm::v3::Location`, but now
it's up to the runtime to configure according to its needs.
Additional/consequent changes:
- `penpal` runtime uses now `xcm::latest::Location` for `pallet_assets`
as `AssetId`, because we don't care about migrations here
- it pretty much simplify xcm-emulator integration tests, where we don't
need now a lots of boilerplate conversions:
```
v3::Location::try_from(...).expect("conversion works")`
```
- xcm-emulator tests
- split macro `impl_assets_helpers_for_parachain` to the
`impl_assets_helpers_for_parachain` and
`impl_foreign_assets_helpers_for_parachain` (avoids using hard-coded
`xcm::v3::Location`)
# Description
Add `transfer_assets_using()` for transferring assets from local chain
to destination chain using explicit XCM transfer types such as:
- `TransferType::LocalReserve`: transfer assets to sovereign account of
destination chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and
deposit reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- `TransferType::DestinationReserve`: burn local assets and forward a
notification to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this
chain's sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- `TransferType::RemoteReserve(reserve)`: burn local assets, forward XCM
to `reserve` chain to move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest`
chain's SA, and forward another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`. Typically the remote `reserve` is
Asset Hub.
- `TransferType::Teleport`: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest`
chain to mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
By default, an asset's reserve is its origin chain. But sometimes we may
want to explicitly use another chain as reserve (as long as allowed by
runtime `IsReserve` filter).
This is very helpful for transferring assets with multiple configured
reserves (such as Asset Hub ForeignAssets), when the transfer strictly
depends on the used reserve.
E.g. For transferring Foreign Assets over a bridge, Asset Hub must be
used as the reserve location.
# Example usage scenarios
## Transfer bridged ethereum ERC20-tokenX between ecosystem parachains.
ERC20-tokenX is registered on AssetHub as a ForeignAsset by the
Polkadot<>Ethereum bridge (Snowbridge). Its asset_id is something like
`(parents:2, (GlobalConsensus(Ethereum), Address(tokenX_contract)))`.
Its _original_ reserve is Ethereum (only we can't use Ethereum as a
reserve in local transfers); but, since tokenX is also registered on
AssetHub as a ForeignAsset, we can use AssetHub as a reserve.
With this PR we can transfer tokenX from ParaA to ParaB while using
AssetHub as a reserve.
## Transfer AssetHub ForeignAssets between parachains
AssetA created on ParaA but also registered as foreign asset on Asset
Hub. Can use AssetHub as a reserve.
And all of the above can be done while still controlling transfer type
for `fees` so mixing assets in same transfer is supported.
# Tests
Added integration tests for showcasing:
- transferring local (not bridged) assets from parachain over bridge
using local Asset Hub reserve,
- transferring foreign assets from parachain to Asset Hub,
- transferring foreign assets from Asset Hub to parachain,
- transferring foreign assets from parachain to parachain using local
Asset Hub reserve.
---------
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Dear team, dear @NachoPal @joepetrowski @bkchr @ggwpez,
This is a retry of #3957, after merging master as advised!,
Many thanks!
**_Milos_**
---------
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Defines a runtime api for `pallet-broker` for getting the current price
of a core if there is an ongoing sale.
Closes: #3413
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Part of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/226
Related https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1833
- Deprecate `CurrencyAdapter` and introduce `FungibleAdapter`
- Deprecate `ToStakingPot` and replace usage with `ResolveTo`
- Required creating a new `StakingPotAccountId` struct that implements
`TypedGet` for the staking pot account ID
- Update parachain common utils `DealWithFees`, `ToAuthor` and
`AssetsToBlockAuthor` implementations to use `fungible`
- Update runtime XCM Weight Traders to use `ResolveTo` instead of
`ToStakingPot`
- Update runtime Transaction Payment pallets to use `FungibleAdapter`
instead of `CurrencyAdapter`
- [x] Blocked by https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1296,
needs the `Unbalanced::decrease_balance` fix
This PR includes the following 2 improvements:
## Ethereum Client
Author: @yrong
### Original Upstream PRs
- https://github.com/Snowfork/polkadot-sdk/pull/123
- https://github.com/Snowfork/polkadot-sdk/pull/125
### Description
The Ethereum client syncs beacon headers as they are finalized, and
imports every execution header. When a message is received, it is
verified against the import execution header. This is unnecessary, since
the execution header can be sent with the message as proof. The recent
Deneb Ethereum upgrade made it easier to locate the relevant beacon
header from an execution header, and so this improvement was made
possible. This resolves a concern @svyatonik had in our initial Rococo
PR:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2522#discussion_r1431270691
## Inbound Queue
Author: @yrong
### Original Upstream PR
- https://github.com/Snowfork/polkadot-sdk/pull/118
### Description
When the AH sovereign account (who pays relayer rewards) is depleted,
the inbound message will not fail. The relayer just will not receive
rewards.
Both these changes were done by @yrong, many thanks. ❤️
---------
Co-authored-by: claravanstaden <Cats 4 life!>
Co-authored-by: Ron <yrong1997@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Geddes <vincent@snowfork.com>
Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <svyatonik@gmail.com>
Working towards migrating the `parity-bridges-common` repo inside
`polkadot-sdk`. This PR upgrades some dependencies in order to align
them with the versions used in `parity-bridges-common`
Related to
https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2538
Fix "double-weights" for extrinsics, use only the ones benchmarked in
the runtime.
Deprecate extrinsics that don't specify WeightLimit, remove their usage
across the repo.
---------
Signed-off-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
**Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.
**This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
repository.**
Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:
- `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`
- `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`
- `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
tracing`
Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
commits for easier reviewing:
- `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'children'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'until'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'indices'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'committed'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'topology'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'response'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'`
- `Fix the spelling of 'network'`
Let me know if this structure is adequate.
**Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`,
`Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it
as it is.
~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to
message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left
it as it is.~~
~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the
more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~
~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the
correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~
**Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs
`judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc.
are both present in different places, but I suppose that's
understandable given the number of contributors.
~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it
triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it
is.~~
Related to
https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2538
This PR doesn't contain any functional changes.
The PR moves specific bridged chain definitions from
`bridges/primitives` to `bridges/chains` folder in order to facilitate
the migration of the `parity-bridges-repo` into `polkadot-sdk` as
discussed in https://hackmd.io/LprWjZ0bQXKpFeveYHIRXw?view
Apart from this it also includes some cosmetic changes to some
`Cargo.toml` files as a result of running `diener workspacify`.
Currently `transfer_assets` from pallet-xcm covers 4 main different
transfer types:
- `localReserve`
- `DestinationReserve`
- `Teleport`
- `RemoteReserve`
For the first three, the local execution and the remote message sending
are separated, and fees are deducted in pallet-xcm itself:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/3410dfb3929462da88be2da813f121d8b1cf46b3/polkadot/xcm/pallet-xcm/src/lib.rs#L1758.
For the 4th case `RemoteReserve`, pallet-xcm is still relying on the
xcm-executor itself to send the message (through the
`initiateReserveWithdraw` instruction). In this case, if delivery fees
need to be charged, it is not possible to do so because the
`jit_withdraw` mode has not being set.
This PR proposes to still use the `initiateReserveWithdraw` but
prepending a `setFeesMode { jit_withdraw: true }` to make sure delivery
fees can be paid.
A test-case is also added to present the aforementioned case
---------
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Bridging fees are calculated using a static ETH/DOT exchange rate that
can deviate significantly from the real-world exchange rate. We
therefore need to add a safety margin to the fee so that users almost
aways cover the cost of relaying.
# FAQ
> Why introduce a `multiplier` parameter instead of configuring an
exchange rate which already has a safety factor applied?
When converting from ETH to DOT, we need to _divide_ the multiplier by
the exchange rate, and to convert from DOT to ETH we need to _multiply_
the multiplier by the exchange rate.
> Other input parameters to the fee calculation can also deviate from
real-world values. These include substrate weights, gas prices, and so
on. Why does the multiplier introduced here not adjust those?
A single scalar multiplier won't be able to accommodate the different
volatilities efficiently. For example, gas prices are much more volatile
than exchange rates, and substrate weights hardly ever change.
So the pricing config relating to weights and gas prices should already
have some appropriate safety margin pre-applied.
# Detailed Changes:
* Added `multiplier` field to `PricingParameters`
* Outbound-queue fee is multiplied by `multiplier`
* This `multiplier` is synced to the Ethereum side
* Improved Runtime API for calculating outbound-queue fees. This API
makes it much easier to for configure parts of the system in preparation
for launch.
* Improve and clarify code documentation
Upstreamed from https://github.com/Snowfork/polkadot-sdk/pull/127
---------
Co-authored-by: Clara van Staden <claravanstaden64@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Introduces `CryptoBytes` type defined as:
```rust
pub struct CryptoBytes<const N: usize, Tag = ()>(pub [u8; N], PhantomData<fn() -> Tag>);
```
The type implements a bunch of methods and traits which are typically
expected from a byte array newtype
(NOTE: some of the methods and trait implementations IMO are a bit
redundant, but I decided to maintain them all to not change too much
stuff in this PR)
It also introduces two (generic) typical consumers of `CryptoBytes`:
`PublicBytes` and `SignatureBytes`.
```rust
pub struct PublicTag;
pub PublicBytes<const N: usize, CryptoTag> = CryptoBytes<N, (PublicTag, CryptoTag)>;
pub struct SignatureTag;
pub SignatureBytes<const N: usize, CryptoTag> = CryptoBytes<N, (SignatureTag, CryptoTag)>;
```
Both of them use a tag to differentiate the two types at a higher level.
Downstream specializations will further specialize using a dedicated
crypto tag. For example in ECDSA:
```rust
pub struct EcdsaTag;
pub type Public = PublicBytes<PUBLIC_KEY_SERIALIZED_SIZE, EcdsaTag>;
pub type Signature = PublicBytes<PUBLIC_KEY_SERIALIZED_SIZE, EcdsaTag>;
```
Overall we have a cleaner and most importantly **consistent** code for
all the types involved
All these details are opaque to the end user which can use `Public` and
`Signature` for the cryptos as before
Currently the xcm-executor returns an `Unimplemented` error if it
receives any HRMP-related instruction.
What I propose here, which is what we are currently doing in our forked
executor at polimec, is to introduce a trait implemented by the executor
which will handle those instructions.
This way, if parachains want to keep the default behavior, they just use
`()` and it will return unimplemented, but they can also implement their
own logic to establish HRMP channels with other chains in an automated
fashion, without requiring to go through governance.
Our implementation is mentioned in the [polkadot HRMP
docs](https://arc.net/l/quote/hduiivbu), and it was suggested to us to
submit a PR to add these changes to polkadot-sdk.
---------
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Removed the `pallet::getter` macro call from storage type definitions
and added the corresponding implementations directly.
fixes#3330
polkadot address: 14JzTPPUd8x8phKi8qLxHgNTnTMg6DUukCLXoWprejkaHXPz
---------
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Issues addressed in this PR:
- Improve *Penpal* runtime:
- Properly handled received assets. Previously, it treated `(1, Here)`
as the local native currency, whereas it should be treated as a
`ForeignAsset`. This wasn't a great example of standard Parachain
behaviour, as no Parachain treats the system asset as the local
currency.
- Remove `AllowExplicitUnpaidExecutionFrom` the system. Again, this
wasn't a great example of standard Parachain behaviour.
- Move duplicated
`ForeignAssetFeeAsExistentialDepositMultiplierFeeCharger` to
`assets_common` crate.
- Improve emulated tests:
- Update *Penpal* tests to new runtime.
- To simplify tests, register the reserve transferred, teleported, and
system assets in *Penpal* and *AssetHub* genesis. This saves us from
having to create the assets repeatedly for each test
- Add missing test case:
`reserve_transfer_assets_from_para_to_system_para`.
- Cleanup.
- Prevent integration tests crates imports from being re-exported, as
they were polluting the `polkadot-sdk` docs.
There is still a test case missing for reserve transfers:
- Reserve transfer of system asset from *Parachain* to *Parachain*
trough *AssetHub*.
- This is not yet possible with `pallet-xcm` due to the reasons
explained in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3339
---------
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Deprecate the `xcm::body::TREASURER_INDEX` constant and use the standard
Treasury variant from the `xcm::BodyId` type instead.
To align with the production runtimes:
https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/149
The current `penpal` runtime utilizes the `EthereumLocation` parameter,
which is employed for XCM emulated integration tests concerning the
Rococo <> ETH bridge. It includes a hard-coded chainId for the Ethereum
testnet utilized in Rococo. The `EthereumLocation` serves the purpose of
aligning with the `TrustedReserves`. However, due to this hard-coded
configuration, reusing `penpal` for testing various environments such as
Kusama/Polkadot versus Ethereum bridge becomes unfeasible.
This PR introduces the capability to easily customize the asset location
for `TrustedReserves` without needing to know anything about Ethereum.
## TODO
- [x] fix integration tests with
`System::set_storage(CustomizableAssetFromSystemAssetHub::key(),
<whatever-location-is-needed>)` @claravanstaden
- [ ] ~~maybe add some helper function/macro to support `set_storage`
for other runtimes (that we could reuse)~~
- [ ] Release patch for: `penpal-runtime` + emulated crate with
`set_storage` support (if needed)
- [ ] backport to 1.7.0
- [ ] backport to 1.8.0
---------
Co-authored-by: Clara van Staden <claravanstaden64@gmail.com>
Closes#2160
First part of [Extrinsic
Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415)
Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace
`SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the
runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data)
yet do not have hard-coded signatures.
Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for
transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned
transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned
which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and
__*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as
a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.)
Types of extrinsic are now therefore:
- Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as
"Unsigned")
- Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with
`ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of
`TransactionExtension` (deprecated).
- Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`.
- Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`.
- Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature).
- General transactions (without a hardcoded signature).
`TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because:
- A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present.
- It may alter the origin during validation.
- `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks
present in `validate`.
- `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a
`AccountId`.
- `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new
user-specifiable type `Val`.
- `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to
`Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and
passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This
facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto.
There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default
function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It
provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from
using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions
should now need to be called directly).
Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now
permissible:
- 0b000000100: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature
or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer
supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only.
- 0b100000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature and
Extra (extension data).
- 0b010000100: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra
(extension data), but no Signature.
For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors
to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g.
through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state,
mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the
above.
## Code Migration
### NOW: Getting it to build
Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be
accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new
terminology. E.g. Before:
```rust
/// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic.
pub type SignedExtra = (
/* snip */
MySpecialSignedExtension,
);
/// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime.
pub type UncheckedExtrinsic =
generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>;
```
After:
```rust
/// The extension to the basic transaction logic.
pub type TxExtension = (
/* snip */
AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>,
);
/// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime.
pub type UncheckedExtrinsic =
generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>;
```
You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a
`.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before:
```rust
fn construct_extrinsic(
/* snip */
) -> UncheckedExtrinsic {
let extra: SignedExtra = (
/* snip */
MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */),
);
let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap();
let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e));
UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed(
/* snip */
Signature::Sr25519(signature),
extra,
)
}
```
After:
```rust
fn construct_extrinsic(
/* snip */
) -> UncheckedExtrinsic {
let tx_ext: TxExtension = (
/* snip */
MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(),
);
let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap();
let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e));
UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed(
/* snip */
Signature::Sr25519(signature),
tx_ext,
)
}
```
### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension`
Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a
`TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know.
- Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now
implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and
`TransactionExtension`.
- Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn
weight`.
#### `TransactionExtensionBase`
This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types
specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`.
- `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to
`Implicit`/`implicit`.
- Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your
extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this
via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure.
#### `TransactionExtension`
Generally:
- `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the
`validate` functionality in there*!
- You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If
you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function
`AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`.
- You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This
defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is
important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to
`prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into
the latter. This is it.
- This trait takes two type parameters: `Call` and `Context`. `Call` is
the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just
move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. `Context` is not
currently used and you can safely implement over it as an unbounded
type.
- There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it.
Regarding `validate`:
- You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when
migrating from `SignedExtension`.
- `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is
the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If
you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and
on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can
pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the
`origin` argument.
Regarding `prepare`:
- This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change:
- FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM
`validate`!!
- (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the
same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.)
Regarding `post_dispatch`:
- Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by
`TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter
is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`.
If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or
`SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then:
- Just use the regular versions of these functions instead.
- Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`.
- Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction
rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all
`TransactionExtension`s' data.
- `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able
to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data,
however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon,
so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design.
## TODO
- [x] Introduce `CheckSignature` impl of `TransactionExtension` to
ensure it's possible to have crypto be done wholly in a
`TransactionExtension`.
- [x] Deprecate `SignedExtension` and move all uses in codebase to
`TransactionExtension`.
- [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment`
- [x] `DummyExtension`
- [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-tx-payment)
- [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-conversion-tx-payment)
- [x] `CheckWeight`
- [x] `CheckTxVersion`
- [x] `CheckSpecVersion`
- [x] `CheckNonce`
- [x] `CheckNonZeroSender`
- [x] `CheckMortality`
- [x] `CheckGenesis`
- [x] `CheckOnlySudoAccount`
- [x] `WatchDummy`
- [x] `PrevalidateAttests`
- [x] `GenericSignedExtension`
- [x] `SignedExtension` (chain-polkadot-bulletin)
- [x] `RefundSignedExtensionAdapter`
- [x] Implement `fn weight` across the board.
- [ ] Go through all pre-existing extensions which assume an account
signer and explicitly handle the possibility of another kind of origin.
- [x] `CheckNonce` should probably succeed in the case of a non-account
origin.
- [x] `CheckNonZeroSender` should succeed in the case of a non-account
origin.
- [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment` and family should fail in the case of a
non-account origin.
- [ ]
- [x] Fix any broken tests.
---------
Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <alexandru.vasile@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <alexandru.gheorghe@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Nikhil Gupta <17176722+gupnik@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <52418509+georgepisaltu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chevdor <chevdor@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Co-authored-by: Maciej <maciej.zyszkiewicz@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <javier@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <marcin@realemail.net>
Co-authored-by: Tsvetomir Dimitrov <tsvetomir@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Javier Bullrich <javier@bullrich.dev>
Co-authored-by: Koute <koute@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev <vladimir@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <ross@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <g6pestana@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <svyatonik@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: s0me0ne-unkn0wn <48632512+s0me0ne-unkn0wn@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ordian <write@reusable.software>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <skunert49@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaro Altonen <48052676+altonen@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dmitry Markin <dmitry@markin.tech>
Co-authored-by: Alexandru Vasile <60601340+lexnv@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Samusev <41779041+alvicsam@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Julian Eager <eagr@tutanota.com>
Co-authored-by: Michal Kucharczyk <1728078+michalkucharczyk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <davxy@datawok.net>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <donal.murray@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: yjh <yjh465402634@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tom Mi <tommi@niemi.lol>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io <79228812+paradox-tt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <info@kchr.de>
Co-authored-by: Joshy Orndorff <JoshOrndorff@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joshy Orndorff <git-user-email.h0ly5@simplelogin.com>
Co-authored-by: PG Herveou <pgherveou@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com>
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Juan Girini <juangirini@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: bader y <ibnbassem@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Wilson <james@jsdw.me>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <25483142+joepetrowski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: asynchronous rob <rphmeier@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Parth <desaiparth08@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Jones <ascjones@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Udd <jonathan@dwellir.com>
Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <serban@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Egor_P <egor@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Evgeny Snitko <evgeny@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Just van Stam <vstam1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: gupnik <nikhilgupta.iitk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dzmitry-lahoda <dzmitry@lahoda.pro>
Co-authored-by: zhiqiangxu <652732310@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Nazar Mokrynskyi <nazar@mokrynskyi.com>
Co-authored-by: Anwesh <anweshknayak@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: cheme <emericchevalier.pro@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sam Johnson <sam@durosoft.com>
Co-authored-by: kianenigma <kian@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Jegor Sidorenko <5252494+jsidorenko@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muharem <ismailov.m.h@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <joe@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <49718502+alexggh@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Facco de Arruda <arrudagates@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Squirrel <gilescope@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Sergej Sakac