pezkuwi-subxt/substrate/frame/staking

Staking Module

The Staking module is used to manage funds at stake by network maintainers.

• staking::Config
• Call
• Module

Overview

The Staking module is the means by which a set of network maintainers (known as authorities in some contexts and validators in others) are chosen based upon those who voluntarily place funds under deposit. Under deposit, those funds are rewarded under normal operation but are held at pain of slash (expropriation) should the staked maintainer be found not to be discharging its duties properly.

Terminology

• Staking: The process of locking up funds for some time, placing them at risk of slashing (loss) in order to become a rewarded maintainer of the network.
• Validating: The process of running a node to actively maintain the network, either by producing blocks or guaranteeing finality of the chain.
• Nominating: The process of placing staked funds behind one or more validators in order to share in any reward, and punishment, they take.
• Stash account: The account holding an owner's funds used for staking.
• Controller account: The account that controls an owner's funds for staking.
• Era: A (whole) number of sessions, which is the period that the validator set (and each validator's active nominator set) is recalculated and where rewards are paid out.
• Slash: The punishment of a staker by reducing its funds.

Goals

The staking system in Substrate NPoS is designed to make the following possible:

• Stake funds that are controlled by a cold wallet.
• Withdraw some, or deposit more, funds without interrupting the role of an entity.
• Switch between roles (nominator, validator, idle) with minimal overhead.

Scenarios

Staking

Almost any interaction with the Staking module requires a process of bonding (also known as being a staker). To become bonded, a fund-holding account known as the stash account, which holds some or all of the funds that become frozen in place as part of the staking process, is paired with an active controller account, which issues instructions on how they shall be used.

An account pair can become bonded using the bond call.

Stash accounts can change their associated controller using the set_controller call.

There are three possible roles that any staked account pair can be in: Validator, Nominator and Idle (defined in StakerStatus). There are three corresponding instructions to change between roles, namely: validate, nominate, and chill.

Validating

A validator takes the role of either validating blocks or ensuring their finality, maintaining the veracity of the network. A validator should avoid both any sort of malicious misbehavior and going offline. Bonded accounts that state interest in being a validator do NOT get immediately chosen as a validator. Instead, they are declared as a candidate and they might get elected at the next era as a validator. The result of the election is determined by nominators and their votes.

An account can become a validator candidate via the validate call.

Nomination

A nominator does not take any direct role in maintaining the network, instead, it votes on a set of validators to be elected. Once interest in nomination is stated by an account, it takes effect at the next election round. The funds in the nominator's stash account indicate the weight of its vote. Both the rewards and any punishment that a validator earns are shared between the validator and its nominators. This rule incentivizes the nominators to NOT vote for the misbehaving/offline validators as much as possible, simply because the nominators will also lose funds if they vote poorly.

An account can become a nominator via the nominate call.

Rewards and Slash

The reward and slashing procedure is the core of the Staking module, attempting to embrace valid behavior while punishing any misbehavior or lack of availability.

Rewards must be claimed for each era before it gets too old by $HISTORY_DEPTH using the payout_stakers call. Any account can call payout_stakers, which pays the reward to the validator as well as its nominators. Only the [Config::MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator] biggest stakers can claim their reward. This is to limit the i/o cost to mutate storage for each nominator's account.

Slashing can occur at any point in time, once misbehavior is reported. Once slashing is determined, a value is deducted from the balance of the validator and all the nominators who voted for this validator (values are deducted from the stash account of the slashed entity).

Slashing logic is further described in the documentation of the slashing module.

Similar to slashing, rewards are also shared among a validator and its associated nominators. Yet, the reward funds are not always transferred to the stash account and can be configured. See Reward Calculation for more details.

Chilling

Finally, any of the roles above can choose to step back temporarily and just chill for a while. This means that if they are a nominator, they will not be considered as voters anymore and if they are validators, they will no longer be a candidate for the next election.

An account can step back via the chill call.

Session managing

The module implement the trait SessionManager. Which is the only API to query new validator set and allowing these validator set to be rewarded once their era is ended.

Interface

Dispatchable Functions

The dispatchable functions of the Staking module enable the steps needed for entities to accept and change their role, alongside some helper functions to get/set the metadata of the module.

Public Functions

The Staking module contains many public storage items and (im)mutable functions.

Usage

Example: Rewarding a validator by id.

use frame_support::{decl_module, dispatch};
use frame_system::ensure_signed;
use pallet_staking::{self as staking};

pub trait Config: staking::Config {}

decl_module! {
    pub struct Module<T: Config> for enum Call where origin: T::Origin {
        /// Reward a validator.
        #[weight = 0]
        pub fn reward_myself(origin) -> dispatch::DispatchResult {
            let reported = ensure_signed(origin)?;
            <staking::Module<T>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(reported, 10)]);
            Ok(())
        }
    }
}

Implementation Details

Era payout

The era payout is computed using yearly inflation curve defined at T::RewardCurve as such:

staker_payout = yearly_inflation(npos_token_staked / total_tokens) * total_tokens / era_per_year

This payout is used to reward stakers as defined in next section

remaining_payout = max_yearly_inflation * total_tokens / era_per_year - staker_payout

The remaining reward is send to the configurable end-point T::RewardRemainder.

Reward Calculation

Validators and nominators are rewarded at the end of each era. The total reward of an era is calculated using the era duration and the staking rate (the total amount of tokens staked by nominators and validators, divided by the total token supply). It aims to incentivize toward a defined staking rate. The full specification can be found here.

Total reward is split among validators and their nominators depending on the number of points they received during the era. Points are added to a validator using reward_by_ids or reward_by_indices.

Module implements pallet_authorship::EventHandler to add reward points to block producer and block producer of referenced uncles.

The validator and its nominator split their reward as following:

The validator can declare an amount, named commission, that does not get shared with the nominators at each reward payout through its ValidatorPrefs. This value gets deducted from the total reward that is paid to the validator and its nominators. The remaining portion is split among the validator and all of the nominators that nominated the validator, proportional to the value staked behind this validator (i.e. dividing the own or others by total in Exposure).

All entities who receive a reward have the option to choose their reward destination through the Payee storage item (see set_payee), to be one of the following:

• Controller account, (obviously) not increasing the staked value.
• Stash account, not increasing the staked value.
• Stash account, also increasing the staked value.

Additional Fund Management Operations

Any funds already placed into stash can be the target of the following operations:

The controller account can free a portion (or all) of the funds using the unbond call. Note that the funds are not immediately accessible. Instead, a duration denoted by BondingDuration (in number of eras) must pass until the funds can actually be removed. Once the BondingDuration is over, the withdraw_unbonded call can be used to actually withdraw the funds.

Note that there is a limitation to the number of fund-chunks that can be scheduled to be unlocked in the future via unbond. In case this maximum (MAX_UNLOCKING_CHUNKS) is reached, the bonded account must first wait until a successful call to withdraw_unbonded to remove some of the chunks.

Election Algorithm

The current election algorithm is implemented based on Phragmén. The reference implementation can be found here.

The election algorithm, aside from electing the validators with the most stake value and votes, tries to divide the nominator votes among candidates in an equal manner. To further assure this, an optional post-processing can be applied that iteratively normalizes the nominator staked values until the total difference among votes of a particular nominator are less than a threshold.

GenesisConfig

The Staking module depends on the GenesisConfig. The GenesisConfig is optional and allow to set some initial stakers.

Related Modules

• Balances: Used to manage values at stake.
• Session: Used to manage sessions. Also, a list of new validators is stored in the Session module's Validators at the end of each era.

License: Apache-2.0