mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-04-29 19:37:56 +00:00
669972a171
* remove extra whitespace Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> * only emit rebag event on success * add doc explaining the term voter * revamp/simplify rebag test * ensure genesis accounts are placed into the correct nodes/bags * bond_extra implicitly rebags * types at top; doc public type * start sketching out adjustable thresholds * add integrity test for voter bag threshold requirements * get rid of BagIdx This reorganizes bag storage such that bags are always referred to by their upper threshold. This in turn means that adding and removing bags is cheaper; you only need to migrate certain voters, not all of them. * implement migration logic for when the threshold list changes * start sketching out threshold proc macros * further refine macro signatures * WIP: implement make_ratio macro * start rethinking the process of producing threshold lists The macro approach seems to be a non-starter; that only really works if we're throwing around numeric literals everywhere, and that's just not nice in this case. Instead, let's write helper functions and make it really easy to generate the tables in separate, permanent files, which humans can then edit. * write helper functions to emit voter bags module * WIP: demo generating voter bags for a realistic runtime This isn't yet done, becuase it seems to take a Very Long Time to run, and it really shouldn't. Need to look into that. Still, it's a lot closer than it was this morning. * rm unnecessary arg_enum * fix voter bags math Turns out that when you're working in exponential space, you need to divide, not subtract, in order to keep the math working properly. Also neaten up the output a little bit to make it easier to read. * add computed voter bags thresholds to node * fixup some docs * iter from large bags to small, fulfuilling the contract * make tests compile * add VoterBagThresholds to some configs * ensure that iteration covers all voters even with implied final bag * use sp_std::boxed::Box; * fix unused import * add some more voter bags tests * file_header.txt * integrity test to ensure min bag exceeds existential weight * add more debug assertions about node list length * rm unused imports * Kian enters * Update frame/election-provider-support/src/onchain.rs Co-authored-by: Zeke Mostov <32168567+emostov@users.noreply.github.com> * Suggestions for #9081 (Store voters in unsorted bags) (#9328) * Add some debug asserts to node::get and remove_node * Improve the debug asserts in remove_node * improve debug asserts * Space * Remove bad assertions * Tests: WIP take_works * Take test * Doc comment * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> * Test storage is cleaned up; * formatting * Switch to simpler thresholds * Update the storage cleanup test * Remove hardcoded values from benchmark to make it more robust * Fix tests to acces bags properly * Sanity check WIP; tests failing * Update sanity checks to be more correct * Improve storage cleanup tests * WIP remote_ext_tests * Some notes on next steps * Remove some stuff that was for remote-ext tests * Some more cleanup to reduce diff * More :clean: * Mo cleanin * small fix * A lot of changes from kian Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: kianenigma <kian@parity.io> * merge fallout * Run cargo +nightly fmt * Fix a bunch of stuff, remove not needed runtime arg of make-bags * add logs * Glue the new staking bags to the election snapshot (#9415) * Glue the new staking bags to the election snapshot * add CheckedRem (#9412) * add CheckedRem * fix * Run fmt * Test comment Co-authored-by: Xiliang Chen <xlchen1291@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: emostov <32168567+emostov@users.noreply.github.com> * Update node runtime with VoterSnapshotPerBlock * Unit test for pallet-staking unsorted bags feature (targets #9081) (#9422) * impl notional_bag_for_works * Add tests: insert_as_works & insert_works * Impl test: remove_works * Trivial cleaning * Add test: update_position_for_works * Write out edge case; probably can delete later * Add test: bags::get_works * Add test: remove_node_happy_path_works * Add test: remove_node_bad_paths_documented * WIP: voting_data_works * done * Improve test voting_data_works * Add comment * Fill out test basic_setup_works * Update: iteration_is_semi_sorted * Improve remove_works * Update update_position_for_works; create set_ledger_and_free_balance * Improve get_works * Improve storage clean up checks in remove test * Test: impl rebag_works + insert_and_remove_works * forgot file - Test: impl rebag_works + insert_and_remove_works * Small tweak * Update voter_bags test to reflect unused bags are removed * Unbond & Rebond: do_rebag * Prevent infinite loops with duplicate tail insert * Check iter.count on voter list in pre-migrate * undo strang fmt comment stuff * Add in todo Co-authored-by: kianenigma <kian@parity.io> * Try prepare for master merge * Reduce diff * Add comment for test to add * Add in code TODO for update_position efficiency updates * Initial impl compiles * impl StakingVoterListStub * Sample impl<T: Config> VoterListProvider<T> for VoterList<T> * impl VoterListProvider for voter-bags * WIP integrate pallet-voter-bags to staking mock * the trait `pallet_staking::pallet::pallet::Config` is not implemented for `mock::Test` * random * pushing my stuff * Mock working * WIP voter list tests * Add bag insert, remove tests * Add test for bag insert and remove * Add remaining tests for VoterList * Add tests for node * Add rebag works * Add rebag extrinsic tests * Rename to bags-list and name the list .. list! * Rename VoterBagThresholds => BagThresholds * Add test count_works * Test on_update_works * test sanity check * a round of test fixes * push a lot of changes * my last changes * all bags-list test work; fmt * Beautify some tests * Doc comment for bags-list * Add insert warnings * Setup initial benchmark * Wire up WeightInfo * is_terminal wip; everything broken! * Is terminal working * add TODOs for remove_node * clean up remoe_node * Fix all staking tests * retire VoterBagFor * commit * bring in stashed changes * save * bench pipeline works now, but I can't run stuff * sabe * benchmarks now run, but we have a failure * WIP: Wire up make_bags * bags-thresholds compiles * Fix most build issues * This will fix all the tests * move bag thresholds to bags-list * Move bag-thresholds bin to within pallet-bags * Remove some unnescary TODOs * Impl tets wrong_rebag_is_noop * assert remove is a noop with bad data * Assert integrity test panics * Return an error when inserting duplicates * Update to handle error in staking pallet when inserting to list * Test contains and on_insert error * Test re-nominate does not mess up list or count * Everything builds and works, only the benchmark... * fuck yeah benchmarks * more cleanup, more hardening. * use the bags list again * fix benhc * Some questions and changs for List::migration * Fix migration removed_bags and new_bags usage * Some trivial aesthetic changes * Some more trivial changes * tiny changes/ * mega rename * fix all tests and ci build * nit * Test and fix migration * nit * fmt * cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks --manifest-path=bin/node/cli/Cargo.toml -- benchmark --chain=dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=pallet_staking --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --output=./frame/staking/src/weights.rs --template=./.maintain/frame-weight-template.hbs * fmt * remove unused * make a few things pub * make node also pub.. for remote-ext test * Fix all tests again * Force bag changes in relevant benchmarks (targets #9507) (#9529) * force rebag for unbond, rebond, and bond_extra * nit * Improve utils * fmt * nits * Move generate_bags to its own pallet * Get runtime-benchmarks feature setup with prepare_on_update_benchmark * Withdraw unbonded kill working * Nominate bench working * some cleanup * WIP * update to check head pre & post conditions * Add some post condition verification stuff for on_remove * Update nominate * fmt * Improvements * Fix build * fix build with polkadot companion * Update frame/bags-list/src/list/tests.rs Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> * move generate-bag from frame to utils * wip * refactor WIP * WIP save * Refactor working * some variable renaming * WIP: prepare to remove head checks * Finish MvP refactor * Some cleanup * Soem more cleanup * save * fix a lot of stuff * Update client/db/src/bench.rs Co-authored-by: Shawn Tabrizi <shawntabrizi@gmail.com> * Apply suggestions from code review * Apply suggestions from code review * Fix some issues that came from trying to merge comments on github * some small changes * simplify it Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: kianenigma <kian@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Shawn Tabrizi <shawntabrizi@gmail.com> * Build works * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> * Remove commented out debug assert * Remove some unused deps and some unused benchmarking stuff * Fix stakings ElectionDataProvider clear * cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks --manifest-path=bin/node/cli/Cargo.toml -- benchmark --chain=dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=pallet_bags_list --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --output=./frame/bags-list/src/weights.rs --template=./.maintain/frame-weight-template.hbs * cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks --manifest-path=bin/node/cli/Cargo.toml -- benchmark --chain=dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=pallet_bags_list --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --output=./frame/bags-list/src/weights.rs --template=./.maintain/frame-weight-template.hbs * cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks --manifest-path=bin/node/cli/Cargo.toml -- benchmark --chain=dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=pallet_bags_list --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --output=./frame/bags-list/src/weights.rs --template=./.maintain/frame-weight-template.hbs * cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks --manifest-path=bin/node/cli/Cargo.toml -- benchmark --chain=dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=pallet_bags_list --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --output=./frame/bags-list/src/weights.rs --template=./.maintain/frame-weight-template.hbs * Improving staking pallet-bags-list migration * fix build and some comments; * comment * Reduce visibility in bags list components * make node.bag_upper only accesible to benchmarks * Address some feedback; comments updates * use nominator map comment * fix vec capacity debug assert * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> * clarify VoterSnapshotPerBlock * Reduce diff on create_validators by wrapping with_seed * Some small improvements to staking benches * Soem comment updates * fix vec capacity debug assert ... for real this time * Reduce ListBags viz * cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks --manifest-path=bin/node/cli/Cargo.toml -- benchmark --chain=dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=pallet_staking --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --output=./frame/staking/src/weights.rs --template=./.maintain/frame-weight-template.hbs * cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks --manifest-path=bin/node/cli/Cargo.toml -- benchmark --chain=dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=pallet_staking --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --output=./frame/staking/src/weights.rs --template=./.maintain/frame-weight-template.hbs * Remove supports_eq_unordered & Support eq_unordered * Update utils/frame/generate-bags/src/lib.rs Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> * Make total-issuance & minimium-balance CLI args; Dont use emptry ext * Improve docs for generate bags CLI args * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> * Don't use default bags weight in node runtime * Feature gating sanity_check not working * Feature gate sanity check by creating duplicate fns * Fix line wrapping * Document VoteWeightProvider * Make bags ext-builder not a module * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> * use pallet_bags_list instead of crate in mock * Make get_bags test helper fn live in List * use remove_from_storage_unchecked for node removal * Remove count of ids removed in remove_many * Add node sanity check, improve list sanity check * Do a list sanity check after on_update * List::migrate: clean up debug assert, exit early when no change in thresholds * Improve public doc comments for pallet_bags_list::list::List * Improve public doc comments for pallet_bags_list::list::List * Update generate bags docs * Fix grammar in bags-list benchmark * Add benchmark case for `rebag` extrinsic * Add count parameter to List::clear; WIP adding MaxEncodedLen to list' * MaxEncodeLen + generate_storage_info not working for Bag or Node * Get MaxEncodeLen derive to work * Try to correctly feature gate SortedListProvider::clear * Use u32::MAX, not u32::max_value * Get up to nominators_quota noms * SortedListProvider::clear takes an Option * Eplicitly ignore SortedListProvider return value * Fix doc comment * Update node-runtime voter snapshot per block * Add test get_max_len_voters_even_if_some_nominators_are_slashed * Add test only_iterates_max_2_times_nominators_quota * Fix generate bags cargo.toml * use sp_std vec * Remove v8 migration hooks from pallet-staking * Update npos trait * Try respect line width * cargo run --quiet --release --features=runtime-benchmarks --manifest-path=bin/node/cli/Cargo.toml -- benchmark --chain=dev --steps=50 --repeat=20 --pallet=pallet_bags_list --extrinsic=* --execution=wasm --wasm-execution=compiled --heap-pages=4096 --output=./frame/bags-list/src/weights.rs --template=./.maintain/frame-weight-template.hbs * Update frame/bags-list/src/benchmarks.rs * Unwrap try-runtime error; remove sortedlistprovider pre upgrade len check * trigger ci * restore * trigger ci * restore * trigger ci * revert * trigger ci * revert Co-authored-by: Peter Goodspeed-Niklaus <coriolinus@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Peter Goodspeed-Niklaus <peter.r.goodspeedniklaus@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: kianenigma <kian@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Xiliang Chen <xlchen1291@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Parity Benchmarking Bot <admin@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Shawn Tabrizi <shawntabrizi@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com>
4386 lines
133 KiB
Rust
4386 lines
133 KiB
Rust
// This file is part of Substrate.
|
|
|
|
// Copyright (C) 2017-2021 Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
|
|
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
//
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
//
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
//! Tests for the module.
|
|
|
|
use super::{Event, *};
|
|
use frame_election_provider_support::{ElectionProvider, SortedListProvider, Support};
|
|
use frame_support::{
|
|
assert_noop, assert_ok,
|
|
dispatch::WithPostDispatchInfo,
|
|
pallet_prelude::*,
|
|
traits::{Currency, Get, OnInitialize, ReservableCurrency},
|
|
weights::{extract_actual_weight, GetDispatchInfo},
|
|
};
|
|
use mock::*;
|
|
use pallet_balances::Error as BalancesError;
|
|
use sp_runtime::{
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate,
|
|
traits::{BadOrigin, Dispatchable},
|
|
Perbill, Percent,
|
|
};
|
|
use sp_staking::{
|
|
offence::{OffenceDetails, OnOffenceHandler},
|
|
SessionIndex,
|
|
};
|
|
use sp_std::prelude::*;
|
|
use substrate_test_utils::assert_eq_uvec;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn force_unstake_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Account 11 is stashed and locked, and account 10 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Adds 2 slashing spans
|
|
add_slash(&11);
|
|
// Cant transfer
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 1, 10),
|
|
BalancesError::<Test, _>::LiquidityRestrictions
|
|
);
|
|
// Force unstake requires root.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::force_unstake(Origin::signed(11), 11, 2), BadOrigin);
|
|
// Force unstake needs correct number of slashing spans (for weight calculation)
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::force_unstake(Origin::root(), 11, 0),
|
|
Error::<Test>::IncorrectSlashingSpans
|
|
);
|
|
// We now force them to unstake
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::force_unstake(Origin::root(), 11, 2));
|
|
// No longer bonded.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), None);
|
|
// Transfer works.
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 1, 10));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn kill_stash_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Account 11 is stashed and locked, and account 10 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Adds 2 slashing spans
|
|
add_slash(&11);
|
|
// Only can kill a stash account
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::kill_stash(&12, 0), Error::<Test>::NotStash);
|
|
// Respects slashing span count
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::kill_stash(&11, 0), Error::<Test>::IncorrectSlashingSpans);
|
|
// Correct inputs, everything works
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::kill_stash(&11, 2));
|
|
// No longer bonded.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), None);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn basic_setup_works() {
|
|
// Verifies initial conditions of mock
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Account 11 is stashed and locked, and account 10 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Account 21 is stashed and locked, and account 20 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&21), Some(20));
|
|
// Account 1 is not a stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&1), None);
|
|
|
|
// Account 10 controls the stash from account 11, which is 100 * balance_factor units
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// Account 20 controls the stash from account 21, which is 200 * balance_factor units
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// Account 1 does not control any stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&1), None);
|
|
|
|
// ValidatorPrefs are default
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![
|
|
(31, ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
(21, ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
(11, ValidatorPrefs::default())
|
|
]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(100),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 101,
|
|
total: 500,
|
|
active: 500,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11),
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 1125,
|
|
own: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![IndividualExposure { who: 101, value: 125 }]
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21),
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 1375,
|
|
own: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![IndividualExposure { who: 101, value: 375 }]
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// initial total stake = 1125 + 1375
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_total_stake(active_era()), 2500);
|
|
|
|
// The number of validators required.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Initial Era and session
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Account 10 has `balance_factor` free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// New era is not being forced
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn change_controller_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// 10 and 11 are bonded as stash controller.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// 10 can control 11 who is initially a validator.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10)));
|
|
|
|
// change controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_controller(Origin::signed(11), 5));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(5));
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// 10 is no longer in control.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(10), ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotController,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(5), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rewards_should_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).session_per_era(3).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let init_balance_10 = Balances::total_balance(&10);
|
|
let init_balance_11 = Balances::total_balance(&11);
|
|
let init_balance_20 = Balances::total_balance(&20);
|
|
let init_balance_21 = Balances::total_balance(&21);
|
|
let init_balance_100 = Balances::total_balance(&100);
|
|
let init_balance_101 = Balances::total_balance(&101);
|
|
|
|
// Set payees
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(21, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(101, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 50)]);
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 50)]);
|
|
// This is the second validator of the current elected set.
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 50)]);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration of the session.
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
let maximum_payout = maximum_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), init_balance_10);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), init_balance_11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&20), init_balance_20);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&21), init_balance_21);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&100), init_balance_100);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&101), init_balance_101);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_reward_points(active_era()),
|
|
EraRewardPoints {
|
|
total: 50 * 3,
|
|
individual: vec![(11, 100), (21, 50)].into_iter().collect(),
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
let part_for_10 = Perbill::from_rational::<u32>(1000, 1125);
|
|
let part_for_20 = Perbill::from_rational::<u32>(1000, 1375);
|
|
let part_for_100_from_10 = Perbill::from_rational::<u32>(125, 1125);
|
|
let part_for_100_from_20 = Perbill::from_rational::<u32>(375, 1375);
|
|
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
mock::REWARD_REMAINDER_UNBALANCED.with(|v| *v.borrow()),
|
|
maximum_payout - total_payout_0,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
*mock::staking_events().last().unwrap(),
|
|
Event::EraPaid(0, total_payout_0, maximum_payout - total_payout_0)
|
|
);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + part_for_10 * total_payout_0 * 2 / 3,
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&11), init_balance_11, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&20),
|
|
init_balance_20 + part_for_20 * total_payout_0 * 1 / 3,
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&21), init_balance_21, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&100),
|
|
init_balance_100 +
|
|
part_for_100_from_10 * total_payout_0 * 2 / 3 +
|
|
part_for_100_from_20 * total_payout_0 * 1 / 3,
|
|
2
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&101), init_balance_101, 2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
mock::REWARD_REMAINDER_UNBALANCED.with(|v| *v.borrow()),
|
|
maximum_payout * 2 - total_payout_0 - total_payout_1,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
*mock::staking_events().last().unwrap(),
|
|
Event::EraPaid(1, total_payout_1, maximum_payout - total_payout_1)
|
|
);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + part_for_10 * (total_payout_0 * 2 / 3 + total_payout_1),
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&11), init_balance_11, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&20),
|
|
init_balance_20 + part_for_20 * total_payout_0 * 1 / 3,
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&21), init_balance_21, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&100),
|
|
init_balance_100 +
|
|
part_for_100_from_10 * (total_payout_0 * 2 / 3 + total_payout_1) +
|
|
part_for_100_from_20 * total_payout_0 * 1 / 3,
|
|
2
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&101), init_balance_101, 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn staking_should_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// remember + compare this along with the test.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..5 {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&i, 2000);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 2:
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
// add a new candidate for being a validator. account 3 controlled by 4.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 1500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(4), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
// No effects will be seen so far.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 3:
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
|
|
// No effects will be seen so far. Era has not been yet triggered.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 4: the validators will now be queued.
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 5: the validators are still in queue.
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 6: the validators will now be changed.
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 4]);
|
|
// --- Block 6: Unstake 4 as a validator, freeing up the balance stashed in 3
|
|
// 4 will chill
|
|
Staking::chill(Origin::signed(4)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 7: nothing. 4 is still there.
|
|
start_session(7);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 4]);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 8:
|
|
start_session(8);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 9: 4 will not be a validator.
|
|
start_session(9);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// Note: the stashed value of 4 is still lock
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&4),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 3,
|
|
total: 1500,
|
|
active: 1500,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![0],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// e.g. it cannot reserve more than 500 that it has free from the total 2000
|
|
assert_noop!(Balances::reserve(&3, 501), BalancesError::<Test, _>::LiquidityRestrictions);
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&3, 409));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn blocking_and_kicking_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.nominate(true)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// block validator 10/11
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
ValidatorPrefs { blocked: true, ..Default::default() }
|
|
));
|
|
// attempt to nominate from 100/101...
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(100), vec![11]));
|
|
// should have worked since we're already nominated them
|
|
assert_eq!(Nominators::<Test>::get(&101).unwrap().targets, vec![11]);
|
|
// kick the nominator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::kick(Origin::signed(10), vec![101]));
|
|
// should have been kicked now
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::get(&101).unwrap().targets.is_empty());
|
|
// attempt to nominate from 100/101...
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(100), vec![11]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::BadTarget
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn less_than_needed_candidates_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::minimum_validator_count(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![30, 20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Previous set is selected. NO election algorithm is even executed.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![30, 20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// But the exposure is updated in a simple way. No external votes exists.
|
|
// This is purely self-vote.
|
|
assert!(ErasStakers::<Test>::iter_prefix_values(active_era())
|
|
.all(|exposure| exposure.others.is_empty()));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn no_candidate_emergency_condition() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(15)
|
|
.set_status(41, StakerStatus::Validator)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// initial validators
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![10, 20, 30, 40]);
|
|
let prefs = ValidatorPrefs { commission: Perbill::one(), ..Default::default() };
|
|
<Staking as crate::Store>::Validators::insert(11, prefs.clone());
|
|
|
|
// set the minimum validator count.
|
|
<Staking as crate::Store>::MinimumValidatorCount::put(10);
|
|
|
|
// try to chill
|
|
let res = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
assert_ok!(res);
|
|
|
|
let current_era = CurrentEra::<Test>::get();
|
|
|
|
// try trigger new era
|
|
mock::run_to_block(20);
|
|
assert_eq!(*staking_events().last().unwrap(), Event::StakingElectionFailed);
|
|
// No new era is created
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era, CurrentEra::<Test>::get());
|
|
|
|
// Go to far further session to see if validator have changed
|
|
mock::run_to_block(100);
|
|
|
|
// Previous ones are elected. chill is not effective in active era (as era hasn't
|
|
// changed)
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![10, 20, 30, 40]);
|
|
// The chill is still pending.
|
|
assert!(!<Staking as crate::Store>::Validators::contains_key(11));
|
|
// No new era is created.
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era, CurrentEra::<Test>::get());
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn nominating_and_rewards_should_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.set_status(41, StakerStatus::Validator)
|
|
.set_status(11, StakerStatus::Idle)
|
|
.set_status(31, StakerStatus::Idle)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// initial validators.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![40, 20]);
|
|
|
|
// re-validate with 11 and 31.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(10), Default::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(30), Default::default()));
|
|
|
|
// Set payee to controller.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(20), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(30), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(40), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// give the man some money
|
|
let initial_balance = 1000;
|
|
for i in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 20, 21].iter() {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(i, initial_balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// bond two account pairs and state interest in nomination.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![11, 21, 31]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![11, 21, 41]));
|
|
|
|
// the total reward for era 0
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(41, 1)]);
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// 10 and 20 have more votes, they will be chosen.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// old validators must have already received some rewards.
|
|
let initial_balance_40 = Balances::total_balance(&40);
|
|
let mut initial_balance_20 = Balances::total_balance(&20);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&40), initial_balance_40 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&20), initial_balance_20 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
initial_balance_20 = Balances::total_balance(&20);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(ErasStakers::<Test>::iter_prefix_values(active_era()).count(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11),
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 1000 + 800,
|
|
own: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 1, value: 400 },
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 3, value: 400 },
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21),
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 1000 + 1200,
|
|
own: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 1, value: 600 },
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 3, value: 600 },
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// the total reward for era 1
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 2)]);
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// nothing else will happen, era ends and rewards are paid again, it is expected that
|
|
// nominators will also be paid. See below
|
|
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
let payout_for_10 = total_payout_1 / 3;
|
|
let payout_for_20 = 2 * total_payout_1 / 3;
|
|
// Nominator 2: has [400/1800 ~ 2/9 from 10] + [600/2200 ~ 3/11 from 20]'s reward. ==>
|
|
// 2/9 + 3/11
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&2),
|
|
initial_balance + (2 * payout_for_10 / 9 + 3 * payout_for_20 / 11),
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
// Nominator 4: has [400/1800 ~ 2/9 from 10] + [600/2200 ~ 3/11 from 20]'s reward. ==>
|
|
// 2/9 + 3/11
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&4),
|
|
initial_balance + (2 * payout_for_10 / 9 + 3 * payout_for_20 / 11),
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Validator 10: got 800 / 1800 external stake => 8/18 =? 4/9 => Validator's share = 5/9
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&10),
|
|
initial_balance + 5 * payout_for_10 / 9,
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
// Validator 20: got 1200 / 2200 external stake => 12/22 =? 6/11 => Validator's share =
|
|
// 5/11
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&20),
|
|
initial_balance_20 + 5 * payout_for_20 / 11,
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn nominators_also_get_slashed_pro_rata() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
let slash_percent = Perbill::from_percent(5);
|
|
let initial_exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
// 101 is a nominator for 11
|
|
assert_eq!(initial_exposure.others.first().unwrap().who, 101);
|
|
|
|
// staked values;
|
|
let nominator_stake = Staking::ledger(100).unwrap().active;
|
|
let nominator_balance = balances(&101).0;
|
|
let validator_stake = Staking::ledger(10).unwrap().active;
|
|
let validator_balance = balances(&11).0;
|
|
let exposed_stake = initial_exposure.total;
|
|
let exposed_validator = initial_exposure.own;
|
|
let exposed_nominator = initial_exposure.others.first().unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
// 11 goes offline
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, initial_exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[slash_percent],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// both stakes must have been decreased.
|
|
assert!(Staking::ledger(100).unwrap().active < nominator_stake);
|
|
assert!(Staking::ledger(10).unwrap().active < validator_stake);
|
|
|
|
let slash_amount = slash_percent * exposed_stake;
|
|
let validator_share =
|
|
Perbill::from_rational(exposed_validator, exposed_stake) * slash_amount;
|
|
let nominator_share =
|
|
Perbill::from_rational(exposed_nominator, exposed_stake) * slash_amount;
|
|
|
|
// both slash amounts need to be positive for the test to make sense.
|
|
assert!(validator_share > 0);
|
|
assert!(nominator_share > 0);
|
|
|
|
// both stakes must have been decreased pro-rata.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(100).unwrap().active, nominator_stake - nominator_share);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(10).unwrap().active, validator_stake - validator_share);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
balances(&101).0, // free balance
|
|
nominator_balance - nominator_share,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
balances(&11).0, // free balance
|
|
validator_balance - validator_share,
|
|
);
|
|
// Because slashing happened.
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(10));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn double_staking_should_fail() {
|
|
// should test (in the same order):
|
|
// * an account already bonded as stash cannot be be stashed again.
|
|
// * an account already bonded as stash cannot nominate.
|
|
// * an account already bonded as controller can nominate.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let arbitrary_value = 5;
|
|
// 2 = controller, 1 stashed => ok
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
Origin::signed(1),
|
|
2,
|
|
arbitrary_value,
|
|
RewardDestination::default()
|
|
));
|
|
// 4 = not used so far, 1 stashed => not allowed.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 4, arbitrary_value, RewardDestination::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyBonded,
|
|
);
|
|
// 1 = stashed => attempting to nominate should fail.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(1), vec![1]), Error::<Test>::NotController);
|
|
// 2 = controller => nominating should work.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![1]));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn double_controlling_should_fail() {
|
|
// should test (in the same order):
|
|
// * an account already bonded as controller CANNOT be reused as the controller of another
|
|
// account.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let arbitrary_value = 5;
|
|
// 2 = controller, 1 stashed => ok
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
Origin::signed(1),
|
|
2,
|
|
arbitrary_value,
|
|
RewardDestination::default(),
|
|
));
|
|
// 2 = controller, 3 stashed (Note that 2 is reused.) => no-op
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 2, arbitrary_value, RewardDestination::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyPaired,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn session_and_eras_work_simple() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().period(1).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Session 1: this is basically a noop. This has already been started.
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Session 2: No change.
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Session 3: Era increment.
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 3);
|
|
|
|
// Session 4: No change.
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 4);
|
|
|
|
// Session 5: No change.
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 5);
|
|
|
|
// Session 6: Era increment.
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 6);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn session_and_eras_work_complex() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().period(5).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 1);
|
|
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 5);
|
|
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 10);
|
|
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 15);
|
|
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 20);
|
|
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 25);
|
|
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 30);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn forcing_new_era_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// normal flow of session.
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// no era change.
|
|
ForceEra::<Test>::put(Forcing::ForceNone);
|
|
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
start_session(7);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// back to normal.
|
|
// this immediately starts a new session.
|
|
ForceEra::<Test>::put(Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
|
|
start_session(8);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
start_session(9);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
// forceful change
|
|
ForceEra::<Test>::put(Forcing::ForceAlways);
|
|
|
|
start_session(10);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
start_session(11);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 3);
|
|
|
|
start_session(12);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 4);
|
|
|
|
// just one forceful change
|
|
ForceEra::<Test>::put(Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
start_session(13);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(ForceEra::<Test>::get(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
|
|
start_session(14);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 6);
|
|
|
|
start_session(15);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 6);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_transfer_staked_balance() {
|
|
// Tests that a stash account cannot transfer funds
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 11 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Confirm account 11 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 (via controller 10) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).total, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 cannot transfer as a result
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 20, 1),
|
|
BalancesError::<Test, _>::LiquidityRestrictions
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 extra free balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 10000);
|
|
// Confirm that account 11 can now transfer some balance
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 20, 1));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_transfer_staked_balance_2() {
|
|
// Tests that a stash account cannot transfer funds
|
|
// Same test as above but with 20, and more accurate.
|
|
// 21 has 2000 free balance but 1000 at stake
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 21 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&21), Some(20));
|
|
// Confirm account 21 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
// Confirm account 21 (via controller 20) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21).total, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 21 can transfer at most 1000
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(21), 20, 1001),
|
|
BalancesError::<Test, _>::LiquidityRestrictions
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(21), 20, 1000));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_reserve_staked_balance() {
|
|
// Checks that a bonded account cannot reserve balance from free balance
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 11 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Confirm account 11 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 (via controller 10) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).own, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 cannot reserve as a result
|
|
assert_noop!(Balances::reserve(&11, 1), BalancesError::<Test, _>::LiquidityRestrictions);
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 extra free balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 10000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 can now reserve balance
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&11, 1));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_destination_works() {
|
|
// Rewards go to the correct destination as determined in Payee
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Check that account 11 is a validator
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
// Check the balance of the validator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// Check how much is at stake
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Staked (default)
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Staked);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the stash account of validator
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000 + total_payout_0);
|
|
// Check that amount at stake increased accordingly
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
active: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![0],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Change RewardDestination to Stash
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000 + total_payout_0 + total_payout_1);
|
|
// Record this value
|
|
let recorded_stash_balance = 1000 + total_payout_0 + total_payout_1;
|
|
// Check that amount at stake is NOT increased
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
active: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![0, 1],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Change RewardDestination to Controller
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
// Check controller balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_2 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(2);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the controller account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1 + total_payout_2);
|
|
// Check that amount at stake is NOT increased
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
active: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![0, 1, 2],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// Check that amount in staked account is NOT increased.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), recorded_stash_balance);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn validator_payment_prefs_work() {
|
|
// Test that validator preferences are correctly honored
|
|
// Note: unstake threshold is being directly tested in slashing tests.
|
|
// This test will focus on validator payment.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let commission = Perbill::from_percent(40);
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::insert(
|
|
&11,
|
|
ValidatorPrefs { commission: commission.clone(), ..Default::default() },
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Reward controller so staked ratio doesn't change.
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&101, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
let balance_era_1_10 = Balances::total_balance(&10);
|
|
let balance_era_1_100 = Balances::total_balance(&100);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
let exposure_1 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
let taken_cut = commission * total_payout_1;
|
|
let shared_cut = total_payout_1 - taken_cut;
|
|
let reward_of_10 = shared_cut * exposure_1.own / exposure_1.total + taken_cut;
|
|
let reward_of_100 = shared_cut * exposure_1.others[0].value / exposure_1.total;
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&10), balance_era_1_10 + reward_of_10, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&100), balance_era_1_100 + reward_of_100, 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_extra_works() {
|
|
// Tests that extra `free_balance` in the stash can be added to stake
|
|
// NOTE: this tests only verifies `StakingLedger` for correct updates
|
|
// See `bond_extra_and_withdraw_unbonded_works` for more details and updates on `Exposure`.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Check that account 10 is a validator
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
// Check that account 10 is bonded to account 11
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Check how much is at stake
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// Call the bond_extra function from controller, add only 100
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(11), 100));
|
|
// There should be 100 more `total` and `active` in the ledger
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Call the bond_extra function with a large number, should handle it
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(11), Balance::max_value()));
|
|
// The full amount of the funds should now be in the total and active
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000000,
|
|
active: 1000000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_extra_and_withdraw_unbonded_works() {
|
|
//
|
|
// * Should test
|
|
// * Given an account being bonded [and chosen as a validator](not mandatory)
|
|
// * It can add extra funds to the bonded account.
|
|
// * it can unbond a portion of its funds from the stash account.
|
|
// * Once the unbonding period is done, it can actually take the funds out of the stash.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// Initial config should be correct
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// check the balance of a validator accounts.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11),
|
|
Exposure { total: 1000, own: 1000, others: vec![] }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// deposit the extra 100 units
|
|
Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(11), 100).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// Exposure is a snapshot! only updated after the next era update.
|
|
assert_ne!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11),
|
|
Exposure { total: 1000 + 100, own: 1000 + 100, others: vec![] }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// ledger should be the same.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// Exposure is now updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11),
|
|
Exposure { total: 1000 + 100, own: 1000 + 100, others: vec![] }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1000).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 1000, era: 2 + 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Attempting to free the balances now will fail. 2 eras need to pass.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10), 0));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 1000, era: 2 + 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// nothing yet
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10), 0));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 1000, era: 2 + 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(5);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10), 0));
|
|
// Now the value is free and the staking ledger is updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 100,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn too_many_unbond_calls_should_not_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// locked at era 0 until 3
|
|
for _ in 0..MAX_UNLOCKING_CHUNKS - 1 {
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// locked at era 1 until 4
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
// can't do more.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1), Error::<Test>::NoMoreChunks);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1), Error::<Test>::NoMoreChunks);
|
|
// free up.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10), 0));
|
|
|
|
// Can add again.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10).unwrap().unlocking.len(), 2);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rebond_works() {
|
|
//
|
|
// * Should test
|
|
// * Given an account being bonded [and chosen as a validator](not mandatory)
|
|
// * it can unbond a portion of its funds from the stash account.
|
|
// * it can re-bond a portion of the funds scheduled to unlock.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Try to rebond some funds. We get an error since no fund is unbonded.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 500), Error::<Test>::NoUnlockChunk);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 900, era: 2 + 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond all the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 900, era: 5 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond part of the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 500).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 600,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 5 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond the remainder of the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 500).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond parts of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 5 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 5 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 5 },
|
|
],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond part of the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 500).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 600,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 5 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 100, era: 5 },
|
|
],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rebond_is_fifo() {
|
|
// Rebond should proceed by reversing the most recent bond operations.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond some of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 400).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 600,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond more of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 300,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 3 + 3 },
|
|
],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond yet more of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 200).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 3 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 200, era: 4 + 3 },
|
|
],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond half of the unbonding funds.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 400).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 500,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 100, era: 3 + 3 },
|
|
],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_to_stake_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.set_status(31, StakerStatus::Idle)
|
|
.set_status(41, StakerStatus::Idle)
|
|
.set_stake(21, 2000)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
// Confirm account 10 and 20 are validators
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11) && <Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&21));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).total, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21).total, 2000);
|
|
|
|
// Give the man some money.
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&10, 1000);
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&20, 1000);
|
|
|
|
// Bypass logic and change current exposure
|
|
ErasStakers::<Test>::insert(0, 21, Exposure { total: 69, own: 69, others: vec![] });
|
|
<Ledger<Test>>::insert(
|
|
&20,
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 69,
|
|
active: 69,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// New era --> rewards are paid --> stakes are changed
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).total, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21).total, 69);
|
|
|
|
let _11_balance = Balances::free_balance(&11);
|
|
assert_eq!(_11_balance, 1000 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
|
|
// Trigger another new era as the info are frozen before the era start.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// -- new infos
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).total, 1000 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21).total, 69 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn on_free_balance_zero_stash_removes_validator() {
|
|
// Tests that validator storage items are cleaned up when stash is empty
|
|
// Tests that storage items are untouched when controller is empty
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(10)
|
|
.balance_factor(10)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Check the balance of the validator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 10);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 10 * 1000);
|
|
// Check these two accounts are bonded
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// Set payee information
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Stash));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items that should be cleaned up
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of controller to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&10, Balance::max_value());
|
|
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account has not been touched
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 10 * 1000);
|
|
// Check these two accounts are still bonded
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items have not changed
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of stash to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&11, Balance::max_value());
|
|
// Check total balance of stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), 10);
|
|
|
|
// Reap the stash
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::reap_stash(Origin::none(), 11, 0));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items do not exist
|
|
assert!(!<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(!<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Nominators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn on_free_balance_zero_stash_removes_nominator() {
|
|
// Tests that nominator storage items are cleaned up when stash is empty
|
|
// Tests that storage items are untouched when controller is empty
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(10)
|
|
.balance_factor(10)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Make 10 a nominator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(10), vec![20]));
|
|
// Check that account 10 is a nominator
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
// Check the balance of the nominator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 10);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 10_000);
|
|
|
|
// Set payee information
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Stash));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items that should be cleaned up
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of controller to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&10, Balance::max_value());
|
|
// Check total balance of account 10
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account has not been touched
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 10_000);
|
|
// Check these two accounts are still bonded
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items have not changed
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of stash to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&11, Balance::max_value());
|
|
// Check total balance of stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), 10);
|
|
|
|
// Reap the stash
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::reap_stash(Origin::none(), 11, 0));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items do not exist
|
|
assert!(!<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(!<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Nominators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn switching_roles() {
|
|
// Test that it should be possible to switch between roles (nominator, validator, idle) with
|
|
// minimal overhead.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Reset reward destination
|
|
for i in &[10, 20] {
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(*i), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..7 {
|
|
let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&i, 5000);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// add 2 nominators
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 2000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![11, 5]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![21, 1]));
|
|
|
|
// add a new validator candidate
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(5), 6, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(6), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// with current nominators 10 and 5 have the most stake
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![6, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// 2 decides to be a validator. Consequences:
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(2), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
// new stakes:
|
|
// 10: 1000 self vote
|
|
// 20: 1000 self vote + 250 vote
|
|
// 6 : 1000 self vote
|
|
// 2 : 2000 self vote + 250 vote.
|
|
// Winners: 20 and 2
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![2, 20]);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn wrong_vote_is_moot() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.add_staker(
|
|
61,
|
|
60,
|
|
500,
|
|
StakerStatus::Nominator(vec![
|
|
11, 21, // good votes
|
|
1, 2, 15, 1000, 25, // crap votes. No effect.
|
|
]),
|
|
)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// the genesis validators already reflect the above vote, nonetheless start a new era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// new validators
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// our new voter is taken into account
|
|
assert!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).others.iter().any(|i| i.who == 61));
|
|
assert!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21).others.iter().any(|i| i.who == 61));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_no_staked_value() {
|
|
// Behavior when someone bonds with no staked value.
|
|
// Particularly when she votes and the candidate is elected.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(3)
|
|
.existential_deposit(5)
|
|
.balance_factor(5)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Can't bond with 1
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1, RewardDestination::Controller),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond,
|
|
);
|
|
// bonded with absolute minimum value possible.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 5, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1)[0].amount, 5);
|
|
|
|
// unbonding even 1 will cause all to be unbonded.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(2), 1));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(2),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 1,
|
|
active: 0,
|
|
total: 5,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 5, era: 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// not yet removed.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(2), 0));
|
|
assert!(Staking::ledger(2).is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1)[0].amount, 5);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// poof. Account 1 is removed from the staking system.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(2), 0));
|
|
assert!(Staking::ledger(2).is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1).len(), 0);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_little_staked_value_bounded() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(3)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// setup
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(Origin::signed(30)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
let init_balance_2 = Balances::free_balance(&2);
|
|
let init_balance_10 = Balances::free_balance(&10);
|
|
|
|
// Stingy validator.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(2), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
// 1 era worth of reward. BUT, we set the timestamp after on_initialize, so outdated by
|
|
// one block.
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
reward_all_elected();
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
// 2 is elected.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10, 2]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 2).total, 0);
|
|
|
|
// Old ones are rewarded.
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + total_payout_0 / 3,
|
|
1
|
|
);
|
|
// no rewards paid to 2. This was initial election.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(2), init_balance_2);
|
|
|
|
// reward era 2
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
reward_all_elected();
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10, 2]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 2).total, 0);
|
|
|
|
// 2 is now rewarded.
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(2),
|
|
init_balance_2 + total_payout_1 / 3,
|
|
1
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(&10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + total_payout_0 / 3 + total_payout_1 / 3,
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_duplicate_vote_should_be_ignored_by_election_provider() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(2)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.set_stake(31, 1000)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// ensure all have equal stake.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::iter()
|
|
.map(|(v, _)| (v, Staking::ledger(v - 1).unwrap().total))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![(31, 1000), (21, 1000), (11, 1000)],
|
|
);
|
|
// no nominators shall exist.
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::iter().map(|(n, _)| n).collect::<Vec<_>>().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
// give the man some money.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1000;
|
|
for i in [1, 2, 3, 4].iter() {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(i, initial_balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![11, 11, 11, 21, 31]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![21, 31]));
|
|
|
|
// winners should be 21 and 31. Otherwise this election is taking duplicates into
|
|
// account.
|
|
let supports = <Test as Config>::ElectionProvider::elect().unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
supports,
|
|
vec![
|
|
(21, Support { total: 1800, voters: vec![(21, 1000), (1, 400), (3, 400)] }),
|
|
(31, Support { total: 2200, voters: vec![(31, 1000), (1, 600), (3, 600)] })
|
|
],
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_duplicate_vote_should_be_ignored_by_election_provider_elected() {
|
|
// same as above but ensures that even when the dupe is being elected, everything is sane.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(2)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.set_stake(31, 1000)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// ensure all have equal stake.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::iter()
|
|
.map(|(v, _)| (v, Staking::ledger(v - 1).unwrap().total))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![(31, 1000), (21, 1000), (11, 1000)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// no nominators shall exist.
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
// give the man some money.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1000;
|
|
for i in [1, 2, 3, 4].iter() {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(i, initial_balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![11, 11, 11, 21]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![21]));
|
|
|
|
// winners should be 21 and 11.
|
|
let supports = <Test as Config>::ElectionProvider::elect().unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
supports,
|
|
vec![
|
|
(11, Support { total: 1500, voters: vec![(11, 1000), (1, 500)] }),
|
|
(21, Support { total: 2500, voters: vec![(21, 1000), (1, 500), (3, 1000)] })
|
|
],
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn new_era_elects_correct_number_of_validators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).validator_count(1).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(validator_controllers().len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(validator_controllers().len(), 1);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_should_not_overflow() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// This is the maximum value that we can have as the outcome of CurrencyToVote.
|
|
type Votes = u64;
|
|
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
|
|
bond_validator(3, 2, Votes::max_value() as Balance);
|
|
bond_validator(5, 4, Votes::max_value() as Balance);
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(7, 6, Votes::max_value() as Balance, vec![3, 5]);
|
|
bond_nominator(9, 8, Votes::max_value() as Balance, vec![3, 5]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![4, 2]);
|
|
|
|
// We can safely convert back to values within [u64, u128].
|
|
assert!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 3).total > Votes::max_value() as Balance);
|
|
assert!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 5).total > Votes::max_value() as Balance);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_validator_slashing_validator_does_not_overflow() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let stake = u64::MAX as Balance * 2;
|
|
let reward_slash = u64::MAX as Balance * 2;
|
|
|
|
// Assert multiplication overflows in balance arithmetic.
|
|
assert!(stake.checked_mul(reward_slash).is_none());
|
|
|
|
// Set staker
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, stake);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Exposure::<AccountId, Balance> { total: stake, own: stake, others: vec![] };
|
|
let reward = EraRewardPoints::<AccountId> {
|
|
total: 1,
|
|
individual: vec![(11, 1)].into_iter().collect(),
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Check reward
|
|
ErasRewardPoints::<Test>::insert(0, reward);
|
|
ErasStakers::<Test>::insert(0, 11, &exposure);
|
|
ErasStakersClipped::<Test>::insert(0, 11, exposure);
|
|
ErasValidatorReward::<Test>::insert(0, stake);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 0));
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), stake * 2);
|
|
|
|
// Set staker
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, stake);
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&2, stake);
|
|
|
|
// only slashes out of bonded stake are applied. without this line,
|
|
// it is 0.
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(2), 20000, stake - 1, RewardDestination::default()).unwrap();
|
|
// Override exposure of 11
|
|
ErasStakers::<Test>::insert(
|
|
0,
|
|
11,
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: stake,
|
|
own: 1,
|
|
others: vec![IndividualExposure { who: 2, value: stake - 1 }],
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Check slashing
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(100)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), stake - 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 1);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_from_authorship_event_handler_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
use pallet_authorship::EventHandler;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(<pallet_authorship::Pallet<Test>>::author(), 11);
|
|
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::note_author(11);
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::note_uncle(21, 1);
|
|
// Rewarding the same two times works.
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::note_uncle(11, 1);
|
|
|
|
// Not mandatory but must be coherent with rewards
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
// 21 is rewarded as an uncle producer
|
|
// 11 is rewarded as a block producer and uncle referencer and uncle producer
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
ErasRewardPoints::<Test>::get(active_era()),
|
|
EraRewardPoints {
|
|
individual: vec![(11, 20 + 2 * 2 + 1), (21, 1)].into_iter().collect(),
|
|
total: 26,
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn add_reward_points_fns_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Not mandatory but must be coherent with rewards
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![21, 11]);
|
|
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 1), (11, 1), (11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 1), (11, 1), (11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
ErasRewardPoints::<Test>::get(active_era()),
|
|
EraRewardPoints { individual: vec![(11, 4), (21, 2)].into_iter().collect(), total: 6 },
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn unbonded_balance_is_not_slashable() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// total amount staked is slashable.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 800));
|
|
|
|
// only the active portion.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&11), 200);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn era_is_always_same_length() {
|
|
// This ensures that the sessions is always of the same length if there is no forcing no
|
|
// session changes.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let session_per_era = <SessionsPerEra as Get<SessionIndex>>::get();
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_start_session_index(current_era()).unwrap(), session_per_era);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_start_session_index(current_era()).unwrap(),
|
|
session_per_era * 2u32
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let session = Session::current_index();
|
|
ForceEra::<Test>::put(Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
advance_session();
|
|
advance_session();
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_start_session_index(current_era()).unwrap(), session + 2);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_start_session_index(current_era()).unwrap(),
|
|
session + 2u32 + session_per_era
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_forces_new_era() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(5)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_ensures_new_era_without_clobbering() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::force_new_era_always(Origin::root()));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceAlways);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(5)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceAlways);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_deselects_validator_even_when_slash_is_zero() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(!Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashing_performed_according_exposure() {
|
|
// This test checks that slashing is performed according the exposure (or more precisely,
|
|
// historical exposure), not the current balance.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).own, 1000);
|
|
|
|
// Handle an offence with a historical exposure.
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Exposure { total: 500, own: 500, others: vec![] }),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The stash account should be slashed for 250 (50% of 500).
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000 - 250);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slash_in_old_span_does_not_deselect() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(10), Default::default()).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
assert!(!Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// this staker is in a new slashing span now, having re-registered after
|
|
// their prior slash.
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// not forcing for zero-slash and previous span.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
// NOTE: A 100% slash here would clean up the account, causing de-registration.
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(95)],
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// or non-zero.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reporters_receive_their_slice() {
|
|
// This test verifies that the reporters of the offence receive their slice from the slashed
|
|
// amount.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// The reporters' reward is calculated from the total exposure.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1125;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).total, initial_balance);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![1, 2],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// F1 * (reward_proportion * slash - 0)
|
|
// 50% * (10% * initial_balance / 2)
|
|
let reward = (initial_balance / 20) / 2;
|
|
let reward_each = reward / 2; // split into two pieces.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1), 10 + reward_each);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(2), 20 + reward_each);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn subsequent_reports_in_same_span_pay_out_less() {
|
|
// This test verifies that the reporters of the offence receive their slice from the slashed
|
|
// amount, but less and less if they submit multiple reports in one span.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// The reporters' reward is calculated from the total exposure.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1125;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).total, initial_balance);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![1],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(20)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// F1 * (reward_proportion * slash - 0)
|
|
// 50% * (10% * initial_balance * 20%)
|
|
let reward = (initial_balance / 5) / 20;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1), 10 + reward);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![1],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let prior_payout = reward;
|
|
|
|
// F1 * (reward_proportion * slash - prior_payout)
|
|
// 50% * (10% * (initial_balance / 2) - prior_payout)
|
|
let reward = ((initial_balance / 20) - prior_payout) / 2;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1), 10 + prior_payout + reward);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invulnerables_are_not_slashed() {
|
|
// For invulnerable validators no slashing is performed.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().invulnerables(vec![11]).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21);
|
|
let initial_balance = Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21);
|
|
|
|
let nominator_balances: Vec<_> =
|
|
exposure.others.iter().map(|o| Balances::free_balance(&o.who)).collect();
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50), Perbill::from_percent(20)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator 11 hasn't been slashed, but 21 has been.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// 2000 - (0.2 * initial_balance)
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000 - (2 * initial_balance / 10));
|
|
|
|
// ensure that nominators were slashed as well.
|
|
for (initial_balance, other) in nominator_balances.into_iter().zip(exposure.others) {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(&other.who),
|
|
initial_balance - (2 * other.value / 10),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn dont_slash_if_fraction_is_zero() {
|
|
// Don't slash if the fraction is zero.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator hasn't been slashed. The new era is not forced.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn only_slash_for_max_in_era() {
|
|
// multiple slashes within one era are only applied if it is more than any previous slash in the
|
|
// same era.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator has been slashed and has been force-chilled.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 500);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator has not been slashed additionally.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 500);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(60)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator got slashed 10% more.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 400);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn garbage_collection_after_slashing() {
|
|
// ensures that `SlashingSpans` and `SpanSlash` of an account is removed after reaping.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(2)
|
|
.balance_factor(2)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 2000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 2000 - 200);
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as crate::Store>::SpanSlash::get(&(11, 0)).amount_slashed(), &200);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(100)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// validator and nominator slash in era are garbage-collected by era change,
|
|
// so we don't test those here.
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), 2);
|
|
|
|
let slashing_spans = <Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(slashing_spans.iter().count(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// reap_stash respects num_slashing_spans so that weight is accurate
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::reap_stash(Origin::none(), 11, 0),
|
|
Error::<Test>::IncorrectSlashingSpans
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::reap_stash(Origin::none(), 11, 2));
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as crate::Store>::SpanSlash::get(&(11, 0)).amount_slashed(), &0);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn garbage_collection_on_window_pruning() {
|
|
// ensures that `ValidatorSlashInEra` and `NominatorSlashInEra` are cleared after
|
|
// `BondingDuration`.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
let now = active_era();
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(now, 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(now, 11)), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - (nominated_value / 10));
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::ValidatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &11).is_some());
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::NominatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &101).is_some());
|
|
|
|
// + 1 because we have to exit the bonding window.
|
|
for era in (0..(BondingDuration::get() + 1)).map(|offset| offset + now + 1) {
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::ValidatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &11).is_some());
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::NominatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &101).is_some());
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(era);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::ValidatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &11).is_none());
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::NominatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &101).is_none());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashing_nominators_by_span_max() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21);
|
|
let nominated_value_11 = exposure_11.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
let nominated_value_21 = exposure_21.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
|
|
let slash_1_amount = Perbill::from_percent(10) * nominated_value_11;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - slash_1_amount);
|
|
|
|
let expected_spans = vec![
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 1, start: 4, length: None },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 0, start: 0, length: Some(4) },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
let get_span = |account| <Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&account).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(get_span(11).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), expected_spans);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(get_span(101).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), expected_spans);
|
|
|
|
// second slash: higher era, higher value, same span.
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(30)],
|
|
3,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 11 was not further slashed, but 21 and 101 were.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1700);
|
|
|
|
let slash_2_amount = Perbill::from_percent(30) * nominated_value_21;
|
|
assert!(slash_2_amount > slash_1_amount);
|
|
|
|
// only the maximum slash in a single span is taken.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - slash_2_amount);
|
|
|
|
// third slash: in same era and on same validator as first, higher
|
|
// in-era value, but lower slash value than slash 2.
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(20)],
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 11 was further slashed, but 21 and 101 were not.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 800);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1700);
|
|
|
|
let slash_3_amount = Perbill::from_percent(20) * nominated_value_21;
|
|
assert!(slash_3_amount < slash_2_amount);
|
|
assert!(slash_3_amount > slash_1_amount);
|
|
|
|
// only the maximum slash in a single span is taken.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - slash_2_amount);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashes_are_summed_across_spans() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let get_span = |account| <Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&account).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let expected_spans = vec![
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 1, start: 4, length: None },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 0, start: 0, length: Some(4) },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(get_span(21).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), expected_spans);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1900);
|
|
|
|
// 21 has been force-chilled. re-signal intent to validate.
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(20), Default::default()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21), 900);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let expected_spans = vec![
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 2, start: 5, length: None },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 1, start: 4, length: Some(1) },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 0, start: 0, length: Some(4) },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(get_span(21).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), expected_spans);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1810);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn deferred_slashes_are_deferred() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// at the start of era 4, slashes from era 1 are processed,
|
|
// after being deferred for at least 2 full eras.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - (nominated_value / 10));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn remove_deferred() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(15)],
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// fails if empty
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::root(), 1, vec![]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::EmptyTargets
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::root(), 1, vec![0]));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// at the start of era 4, slashes from era 1 are processed,
|
|
// after being deferred for at least 2 full eras.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
// the first slash for 10% was cancelled, so no effect.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(5);
|
|
|
|
let slash_10 = Perbill::from_percent(10);
|
|
let slash_15 = Perbill::from_percent(15);
|
|
let initial_slash = slash_10 * nominated_value;
|
|
|
|
let total_slash = slash_15 * nominated_value;
|
|
let actual_slash = total_slash - initial_slash;
|
|
|
|
// 5% slash (15 - 10) processed now.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 950);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - actual_slash);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn remove_multi_deferred() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (42, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (69, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as Store>::UnappliedSlashes::get(&1).len(), 5);
|
|
|
|
// fails if list is not sorted
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::root(), 1, vec![2, 0, 4]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotSortedAndUnique
|
|
);
|
|
// fails if list is not unique
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::root(), 1, vec![0, 2, 2]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotSortedAndUnique
|
|
);
|
|
// fails if bad index
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::root(), 1, vec![1, 2, 3, 4, 5]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidSlashIndex
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::root(), 1, vec![0, 2, 4]));
|
|
|
|
let slashes = <Staking as Store>::UnappliedSlashes::get(&1);
|
|
assert_eq!(slashes.len(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(slashes[0].validator, 21);
|
|
assert_eq!(slashes[1].validator, 42);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slash_kicks_validators_not_nominators_and_disables_nominator_for_kicked_validator() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
// pre-slash balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// 11 and 21 both have the support of 100
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), &11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), &21);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(exposure_11.total, 1000 + 125);
|
|
assert_eq!(exposure_21.total, 1000 + 375);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure_11.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// post-slash balance
|
|
let nominator_slash_amount_11 = 125 / 10;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - nominator_slash_amount_11);
|
|
|
|
// This is the best way to check that the validator was chilled; `get` will
|
|
// return default value.
|
|
for (stash, _) in <Staking as Store>::Validators::iter() {
|
|
assert!(stash != 11);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let nominations = <Staking as Store>::Nominators::get(&101).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// and make sure that the vote will be ignored even if the validator
|
|
// re-registers.
|
|
let last_slash = <Staking as Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).unwrap().last_nonzero_slash();
|
|
assert!(nominations.submitted_in < last_slash);
|
|
|
|
// actually re-bond the slashed validator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(10), Default::default()));
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), &11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), &21);
|
|
|
|
// 10 is re-elected, but without the support of 100
|
|
assert_eq!(exposure_11.total, 900);
|
|
|
|
// 20 is re-elected, with the (almost) entire support of 100
|
|
assert_eq!(exposure_21.total, 1000 + 500 - nominator_slash_amount_11);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn claim_reward_at_the_last_era_and_no_double_claim_and_invalid_claim() {
|
|
// should check that:
|
|
// * rewards get paid until history_depth for both validators and nominators
|
|
// * an invalid era to claim doesn't update last_reward
|
|
// * double claim of one era fails
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Consumed weight for all payout_stakers dispatches that fail
|
|
let err_weight = weights::SubstrateWeight::<Test>::payout_stakers_alive_staked(0);
|
|
|
|
let init_balance_10 = Balances::total_balance(&10);
|
|
let init_balance_100 = Balances::total_balance(&100);
|
|
|
|
let part_for_10 = Perbill::from_rational::<u32>(1000, 1125);
|
|
let part_for_100 = Perbill::from_rational::<u32>(125, 1125);
|
|
|
|
// Check state
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(101, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// Change total issuance in order to modify total payout
|
|
let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&999, 1_000_000_000);
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 != total_payout_0);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// Change total issuance in order to modify total payout
|
|
let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&999, 1_000_000_000);
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_2 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
assert!(total_payout_2 != total_payout_0);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_2 != total_payout_1);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(Staking::history_depth() + 1);
|
|
|
|
let active_era = active_era();
|
|
|
|
// This is the latest planned era in staking, not the active era
|
|
let current_era = Staking::current_era().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// Last kept is 1:
|
|
assert!(current_era - Staking::history_depth() == 1);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 0),
|
|
// Fail: Era out of history
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 1));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 2));
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 2),
|
|
// Fail: Double claim
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyClaimed.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, active_era),
|
|
// Fail: Era not finished yet
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Era 0 can't be rewarded anymore and current era can't be rewarded yet
|
|
// only era 1 and 2 can be rewarded.
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + part_for_10 * (total_payout_1 + total_payout_2),
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&100),
|
|
init_balance_100 + part_for_100 * (total_payout_1 + total_payout_2),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn zero_slash_keeps_nominators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// This is the best way to check that the validator was chilled; `get` will
|
|
// return default value.
|
|
for (stash, _) in <Staking as Store>::Validators::iter() {
|
|
assert!(stash != 11);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let nominations = <Staking as Store>::Nominators::get(&101).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// and make sure that the vote will not be ignored, because the slash was
|
|
// zero.
|
|
let last_slash = <Staking as Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).unwrap().last_nonzero_slash();
|
|
assert!(nominations.submitted_in >= last_slash);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn six_session_delay() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().initialize_first_session(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
use pallet_session::SessionManager;
|
|
|
|
let val_set = Session::validators();
|
|
let init_session = Session::current_index();
|
|
let init_active_era = active_era();
|
|
|
|
// pallet-session is delaying session by one, thus the next session to plan is +2.
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 2), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 3),
|
|
Some(val_set.clone())
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 4), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 5), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 6),
|
|
Some(val_set.clone())
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), init_active_era);
|
|
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 1);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), init_active_era);
|
|
|
|
// Reward current era
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// New active era is triggered here.
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 2);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), init_active_era + 1);
|
|
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 3);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), init_active_era + 1);
|
|
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 4);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), init_active_era + 1);
|
|
|
|
// Reward current era
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 2)]);
|
|
|
|
// New active era is triggered here.
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 5);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), init_active_era + 2);
|
|
|
|
// That reward are correct
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_reward_points(init_active_era).total, 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_reward_points(init_active_era + 1).total, 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn test_max_nominator_rewarded_per_validator_and_cant_steal_someone_else_reward() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
for i in 0..=<Test as Config>::MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator::get() {
|
|
let stash = 10_000 + i as AccountId;
|
|
let controller = 20_000 + i as AccountId;
|
|
let balance = 10_000 + i as Balance;
|
|
Balances::make_free_balance_be(&stash, balance);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
Origin::signed(stash),
|
|
controller,
|
|
balance,
|
|
RewardDestination::Stash
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(controller), vec![11]));
|
|
}
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
<Pallet<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
// Assert only nominators from 1 to Max are rewarded
|
|
for i in 0..=<Test as Config>::MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator::get() {
|
|
let stash = 10_000 + i as AccountId;
|
|
let balance = 10_000 + i as Balance;
|
|
if stash == 10_000 {
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(&stash) == balance);
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(&stash) > balance);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn set_history_depth_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(10);
|
|
Staking::set_history_depth(Origin::root(), 20, 0).unwrap();
|
|
assert!(<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 4));
|
|
assert!(<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 5));
|
|
Staking::set_history_depth(Origin::root(), 4, 0).unwrap();
|
|
assert!(<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 4));
|
|
assert!(!<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 5));
|
|
Staking::set_history_depth(Origin::root(), 3, 0).unwrap();
|
|
assert!(!<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 4));
|
|
assert!(!<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 5));
|
|
Staking::set_history_depth(Origin::root(), 8, 0).unwrap();
|
|
assert!(!<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 4));
|
|
assert!(!<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 5));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn test_payout_stakers() {
|
|
// Here we will test validator can set `max_nominators_payout` and it works.
|
|
// We also test that `payout_extra_nominators` works.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let balance = 1000;
|
|
// Create a validator:
|
|
bond_validator(11, 10, balance); // Default(64)
|
|
|
|
// Create nominators, targeting stash of validators
|
|
for i in 0..100 {
|
|
bond_nominator(1000 + i, 100 + i, balance + i as Balance, vec![11]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 1));
|
|
|
|
// Top 64 nominators of validator 11 automatically paid out, including the validator
|
|
// Validator payout goes to controller.
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(&10) > balance);
|
|
for i in 36..100 {
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(&(100 + i)) > balance + i as Balance);
|
|
}
|
|
// The bottom 36 do not
|
|
for i in 0..36 {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&(100 + i)), balance + i as Balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We track rewards in `claimed_rewards` vec
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![1]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
for i in 3..16 {
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(i);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, i - 1));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We track rewards in `claimed_rewards` vec
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: (1..=14).collect()
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
for i in 16..100 {
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
mock::start_active_era(i);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We clean it up as history passes
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 15));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 98));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![15, 98]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Out of order claims works.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 69));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 23));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 42));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![15, 23, 42, 69, 98]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn payout_stakers_handles_basic_errors() {
|
|
// Here we will test payouts handle all errors.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Consumed weight for all payout_stakers dispatches that fail
|
|
let err_weight = weights::SubstrateWeight::<Test>::payout_stakers_alive_staked(0);
|
|
|
|
// Same setup as the test above
|
|
let balance = 1000;
|
|
bond_validator(11, 10, balance); // Default(64)
|
|
|
|
// Create nominators, targeting stash
|
|
for i in 0..100 {
|
|
bond_nominator(1000 + i, 100 + i, balance + i as Balance, vec![11]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// Wrong Era, too big
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 2),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
// Wrong Staker
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 10, 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotStash.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
for i in 3..100 {
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
mock::start_active_era(i);
|
|
}
|
|
// We are at era 99, with history depth of 84
|
|
// We should be able to payout era 15 through 98 (84 total eras), but not 14 or 99.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 14),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 99),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 15));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 98));
|
|
|
|
// Can't claim again
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 15),
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyClaimed.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 98),
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyClaimed.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn payout_stakers_handles_weight_refund() {
|
|
// Note: this test relies on the assumption that `payout_stakers_alive_staked` is solely used by
|
|
// `payout_stakers` to calculate the weight of each payout op.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let max_nom_rewarded = <Test as Config>::MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator::get();
|
|
// Make sure the configured value is meaningful for our use.
|
|
assert!(max_nom_rewarded >= 4);
|
|
let half_max_nom_rewarded = max_nom_rewarded / 2;
|
|
// Sanity check our max and half max nominator quantities.
|
|
assert!(half_max_nom_rewarded > 0);
|
|
assert!(max_nom_rewarded > half_max_nom_rewarded);
|
|
|
|
let max_nom_rewarded_weight =
|
|
<Test as Config>::WeightInfo::payout_stakers_alive_staked(max_nom_rewarded);
|
|
let half_max_nom_rewarded_weight =
|
|
<Test as Config>::WeightInfo::payout_stakers_alive_staked(half_max_nom_rewarded);
|
|
let zero_nom_payouts_weight = <Test as Config>::WeightInfo::payout_stakers_alive_staked(0);
|
|
assert!(zero_nom_payouts_weight > 0);
|
|
assert!(half_max_nom_rewarded_weight > zero_nom_payouts_weight);
|
|
assert!(max_nom_rewarded_weight > half_max_nom_rewarded_weight);
|
|
|
|
let balance = 1000;
|
|
bond_validator(11, 10, balance);
|
|
|
|
// Era 1
|
|
start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Reward just the validator.
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// Add some `half_max_nom_rewarded` nominators who will start backing the validator in the
|
|
// next era.
|
|
for i in 0..half_max_nom_rewarded {
|
|
bond_nominator((1000 + i).into(), (100 + i).into(), balance + i as Balance, vec![11]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Era 2
|
|
start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// Collect payouts when there are no nominators
|
|
let call =
|
|
TestRuntimeCall::Staking(StakingCall::payout_stakers { validator_stash: 11, era: 1 });
|
|
let info = call.get_dispatch_info();
|
|
let result = call.dispatch(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
assert_ok!(result);
|
|
assert_eq!(extract_actual_weight(&result, &info), zero_nom_payouts_weight);
|
|
|
|
// The validator is not rewarded in this era; so there will be zero payouts to claim for
|
|
// this era.
|
|
|
|
// Era 3
|
|
start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// Collect payouts for an era where the validator did not receive any points.
|
|
let call =
|
|
TestRuntimeCall::Staking(StakingCall::payout_stakers { validator_stash: 11, era: 2 });
|
|
let info = call.get_dispatch_info();
|
|
let result = call.dispatch(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
assert_ok!(result);
|
|
assert_eq!(extract_actual_weight(&result, &info), zero_nom_payouts_weight);
|
|
|
|
// Reward the validator and its nominators.
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// Era 4
|
|
start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
// Collect payouts when the validator has `half_max_nom_rewarded` nominators.
|
|
let call =
|
|
TestRuntimeCall::Staking(StakingCall::payout_stakers { validator_stash: 11, era: 3 });
|
|
let info = call.get_dispatch_info();
|
|
let result = call.dispatch(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
assert_ok!(result);
|
|
assert_eq!(extract_actual_weight(&result, &info), half_max_nom_rewarded_weight);
|
|
|
|
// Add enough nominators so that we are at the limit. They will be active nominators
|
|
// in the next era.
|
|
for i in half_max_nom_rewarded..max_nom_rewarded {
|
|
bond_nominator((1000 + i).into(), (100 + i).into(), balance + i as Balance, vec![11]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Era 5
|
|
start_active_era(5);
|
|
// We now have `max_nom_rewarded` nominators actively nominating our validator.
|
|
|
|
// Reward the validator so we can collect for everyone in the next era.
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// Era 6
|
|
start_active_era(6);
|
|
|
|
// Collect payouts when the validator had `half_max_nom_rewarded` nominators.
|
|
let call =
|
|
TestRuntimeCall::Staking(StakingCall::payout_stakers { validator_stash: 11, era: 5 });
|
|
let info = call.get_dispatch_info();
|
|
let result = call.dispatch(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
assert_ok!(result);
|
|
assert_eq!(extract_actual_weight(&result, &info), max_nom_rewarded_weight);
|
|
|
|
// Try and collect payouts for an era that has already been collected.
|
|
let call =
|
|
TestRuntimeCall::Staking(StakingCall::payout_stakers { validator_stash: 11, era: 5 });
|
|
let info = call.get_dispatch_info();
|
|
let result = call.dispatch(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
assert!(result.is_err());
|
|
// When there is an error the consumed weight == weight when there are 0 nominator payouts.
|
|
assert_eq!(extract_actual_weight(&result, &info), zero_nom_payouts_weight);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_during_era_correctly_populates_claimed_rewards() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Era = None
|
|
bond_validator(9, 8, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&8),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 9,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(5);
|
|
bond_validator(11, 10, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: (0..5).collect(),
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(99);
|
|
bond_validator(13, 12, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&12),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 13,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: (15..99).collect(),
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offences_weight_calculated_correctly() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// On offence with zero offenders: 4 Reads, 1 Write
|
|
let zero_offence_weight = <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(4, 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::on_offence(&[], &[Perbill::from_percent(50)], 0), zero_offence_weight);
|
|
|
|
// On Offence with N offenders, Unapplied: 4 Reads, 1 Write + 4 Reads, 5 Writes
|
|
let n_offence_unapplied_weight = <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(4, 1)
|
|
+ <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(4, 5);
|
|
|
|
let offenders: Vec<OffenceDetails<<Test as frame_system::Config>::AccountId, pallet_session::historical::IdentificationTuple<Test>>>
|
|
= (1..10).map(|i|
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (i, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), i)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}
|
|
).collect();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::on_offence(&offenders, &[Perbill::from_percent(50)], 0), n_offence_unapplied_weight);
|
|
|
|
// On Offence with one offenders, Applied
|
|
let one_offender = [
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![1],
|
|
},
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
let n = 1; // Number of offenders
|
|
let rw = 3 + 3 * n; // rw reads and writes
|
|
let one_offence_unapplied_weight = <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(4, 1)
|
|
+ <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(rw, rw)
|
|
// One `slash_cost`
|
|
+ <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(6, 5)
|
|
// `slash_cost` * nominators (1)
|
|
+ <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(6, 5)
|
|
// `reward_cost` * reporters (1)
|
|
+ <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(2, 2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::on_offence(&one_offender, &[Perbill::from_percent(50)], 0), one_offence_unapplied_weight);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn payout_creates_controller() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let balance = 1000;
|
|
// Create a validator:
|
|
bond_validator(11, 10, balance);
|
|
|
|
// Create a stash/controller pair
|
|
bond_nominator(1234, 1337, 100, vec![11]);
|
|
|
|
// kill controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(1337), 1234, 100));
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1337), 0);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 1));
|
|
|
|
// Controller is created
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(1337) > 0);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn payout_to_any_account_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let balance = 1000;
|
|
// Create a validator:
|
|
bond_validator(11, 10, balance); // Default(64)
|
|
|
|
// Create a stash/controller pair
|
|
bond_nominator(1234, 1337, 100, vec![11]);
|
|
|
|
// Update payout location
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(1337), RewardDestination::Account(42)));
|
|
|
|
// Reward Destination account doesn't exist
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(42), 0);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(Origin::signed(1337), 11, 1));
|
|
|
|
// Payment is successful
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(42) > 0);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn session_buffering_with_offset() {
|
|
// similar to live-chains, have some offset for the first session
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offset(2)
|
|
.period(5)
|
|
.session_per_era(5)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 2);
|
|
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 7);
|
|
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 12);
|
|
|
|
// active era is lagging behind by one session, because of how session module works.
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 17);
|
|
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 22);
|
|
|
|
// go all the way to active 2.
|
|
start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 10);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn session_buffering_no_offset() {
|
|
// no offset, first session starts immediately
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offset(0)
|
|
.period(5)
|
|
.session_per_era(5)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 5);
|
|
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 10);
|
|
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 15);
|
|
|
|
// active era is lagging behind by one session, because of how session module works.
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 20);
|
|
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 25);
|
|
|
|
// go all the way to active 2.
|
|
start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 10);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_rebond_to_lower_than_ed() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(10)
|
|
.balance_factor(10)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// initial stuff.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 10 * 1000,
|
|
active: 10 * 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// unbond all of it. must be chilled first.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(Origin::signed(20)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(20), 10 * 1000));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 10 * 1000,
|
|
active: 0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 10 * 1000, era: 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// now bond a wee bit more
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(20), 5), Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_bond_extra_to_lower_than_ed() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(10)
|
|
.balance_factor(10)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// initial stuff.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 10 * 1000,
|
|
active: 10 * 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// unbond all of it. must be chilled first.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(Origin::signed(20)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(20), 10 * 1000));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 10 * 1000,
|
|
active: 0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 10 * 1000, era: 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// now bond a wee bit more
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(21), 5),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn do_not_die_when_active_is_ed() {
|
|
let ed = 10;
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(ed)
|
|
.balance_factor(ed)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// given
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 1000 * ed,
|
|
active: 1000 * ed,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// when unbond all of it except ed.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(20), 999 * ed));
|
|
start_active_era(3);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(20), 100));
|
|
|
|
// then
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: ed,
|
|
active: ed,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: vec![]
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn on_finalize_weight_is_nonzero() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let on_finalize_weight = <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads(1);
|
|
assert!(<Staking as Hooks<u64>>::on_initialize(1) >= on_finalize_weight);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mod election_data_provider {
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
use frame_election_provider_support::ElectionDataProvider;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn targets_2sec_block() {
|
|
let mut validators = 1000;
|
|
while <Test as Config>::WeightInfo::get_npos_targets(validators) <
|
|
2 * frame_support::weights::constants::WEIGHT_PER_SECOND
|
|
{
|
|
validators += 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
println!("Can create a snapshot of {} validators in 2sec block", validators);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn voters_2sec_block() {
|
|
// we assume a network only wants up to 1000 validators in most cases, thus having 2000
|
|
// candidates is as high as it gets.
|
|
let validators = 2000;
|
|
// we assume the worse case: each validator also has a slashing span.
|
|
let slashing_spans = validators;
|
|
let mut nominators = 1000;
|
|
|
|
while <Test as Config>::WeightInfo::get_npos_voters(validators, nominators, slashing_spans) <
|
|
2 * frame_support::weights::constants::WEIGHT_PER_SECOND
|
|
{
|
|
nominators += 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
println!(
|
|
"Can create a snapshot of {} nominators [{} validators, each 1 slashing] in 2sec block",
|
|
nominators, validators
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn voters_include_self_vote() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::iter().map(|(x, _)| x).all(|v| Staking::voters(None)
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.find(|(w, _, t)| { v == *w && t[0] == *w })
|
|
.is_some()))
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn voters_exclude_slashed() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Staking as ElectionDataProvider<AccountId, BlockNumber>>::voters(None)
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.find(|x| x.0 == 101)
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.2,
|
|
vec![11, 21]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
start_active_era(1);
|
|
add_slash(&11);
|
|
|
|
// 11 is gone.
|
|
start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Staking as ElectionDataProvider<AccountId, BlockNumber>>::voters(None)
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.find(|x| x.0 == 101)
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.2,
|
|
vec![21]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// resubmit and it is back
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(100), vec![11, 21]));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Staking as ElectionDataProvider<AccountId, BlockNumber>>::voters(None)
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.find(|x| x.0 == 101)
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.2,
|
|
vec![11, 21]
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn respects_snapshot_len_limits() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.set_status(41, StakerStatus::Validator)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// sum of all nominators who'd be voters (1), plus the self-votes (4).
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Test as Config>::SortedListProvider::count() +
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::iter().count() as u32,
|
|
5
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// if limits is less..
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::voters(Some(1)).unwrap().len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// if limit is equal..
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::voters(Some(5)).unwrap().len(), 5);
|
|
|
|
// if limit is more.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::voters(Some(55)).unwrap().len(), 5);
|
|
|
|
// if target limit is more..
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::targets(Some(6)).unwrap().len(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::targets(Some(4)).unwrap().len(), 4);
|
|
|
|
// if target limit is less, then we return an error.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::targets(Some(1)).unwrap_err(), "Target snapshot too big");
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn only_iterates_max_2_times_nominators_quota() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(true) // add nominator 101, who nominates [11, 21]
|
|
// the other nominators only nominate 21
|
|
.add_staker(61, 60, 2_000, StakerStatus::<AccountId>::Nominator(vec![21]))
|
|
.add_staker(71, 70, 2_000, StakerStatus::<AccountId>::Nominator(vec![21]))
|
|
.add_staker(81, 80, 2_000, StakerStatus::<AccountId>::Nominator(vec![21]))
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// given our nominators ordered by stake,
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Test as Config>::SortedListProvider::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![61, 71, 81, 101]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// and total voters
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Test as Config>::SortedListProvider::count() +
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::iter().count() as u32,
|
|
7
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// roll to session 5
|
|
run_to_block(25);
|
|
|
|
// slash 21, the only validator nominated by our first 3 nominators
|
|
add_slash(&21);
|
|
|
|
// we take 4 voters: 2 validators and 2 nominators (so nominators quota = 2)
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::voters(Some(3))
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.map(|(stash, _, _)| stash)
|
|
.copied()
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![31, 11], // 2 validators, but no nominators because we hit the quota
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Even if some of the higher staked nominators are slashed, we still get up to max len voters
|
|
// by adding more lower staked nominators. In other words, we assert that we keep on adding
|
|
// valid nominators until we reach max len voters; which is opposed to simply stopping after we
|
|
// have iterated max len voters, but not adding all of them to voters due to some nominators not
|
|
// having valid targets.
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn get_max_len_voters_even_if_some_nominators_are_slashed() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(true) // add nominator 101, who nominates [11, 21]
|
|
.add_staker(61, 60, 20, StakerStatus::<AccountId>::Nominator(vec![21]))
|
|
// 61 only nominates validator 21 ^^
|
|
.add_staker(71, 70, 10, StakerStatus::<AccountId>::Nominator(vec![11, 21]))
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// given our nominators ordered by stake,
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Test as Config>::SortedListProvider::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![101, 61, 71]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// and total voters
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Test as Config>::SortedListProvider::count() +
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::iter().count() as u32,
|
|
6
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// we take 5 voters
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::voters(Some(5))
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.map(|(stash, _, _)| stash)
|
|
.copied()
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
// then
|
|
vec![
|
|
31, 21, 11, // 3 nominators
|
|
101, 61 // 2 validators, and 71 is excluded
|
|
],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// roll to session 5
|
|
run_to_block(25);
|
|
|
|
// slash 21, the only validator nominated by 61
|
|
add_slash(&21);
|
|
|
|
// we take 4 voters
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::voters(Some(4))
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.map(|(stash, _, _)| stash)
|
|
.copied()
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![
|
|
31, 11, // 2 validators (21 was slashed)
|
|
101, 71 // 2 nominators, excluding 61
|
|
],
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn estimate_next_election_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().session_per_era(5).period(5).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// first session is always length 0.
|
|
for b in 1..20 {
|
|
run_to_block(b);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 20);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// election
|
|
run_to_block(20);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 45);
|
|
assert_eq!(staking_events().len(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(*staking_events().last().unwrap(), Event::StakersElected);
|
|
|
|
for b in 21..45 {
|
|
run_to_block(b);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 45);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// election
|
|
run_to_block(45);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 70);
|
|
assert_eq!(staking_events().len(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(*staking_events().last().unwrap(), Event::StakersElected);
|
|
|
|
Staking::force_no_eras(Origin::root()).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), u64::MAX);
|
|
|
|
Staking::force_new_era_always(Origin::root()).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 45 + 5);
|
|
|
|
Staking::force_new_era(Origin::root()).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 45 + 5);
|
|
|
|
// Do a fail election
|
|
MinimumValidatorCount::<Test>::put(1000);
|
|
run_to_block(50);
|
|
// Election: failed, next session is a new election
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 50 + 5);
|
|
// The new era is still forced until a new era is planned.
|
|
assert_eq!(ForceEra::<Test>::get(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
|
|
MinimumValidatorCount::<Test>::put(2);
|
|
run_to_block(55);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 55 + 25);
|
|
assert_eq!(staking_events().len(), 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(*staking_events().last().unwrap(), Event::StakersElected);
|
|
// The new era has been planned, forcing is changed from `ForceNew` to `NotForcing`.
|
|
assert_eq!(ForceEra::<Test>::get(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
#[should_panic]
|
|
fn count_check_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// We should never insert into the validators or nominators map directly as this will
|
|
// not keep track of the count. This test should panic as we verify the count is accurate
|
|
// after every test using the `post_checks` in `mock`.
|
|
Validators::<Test>::insert(987654321, ValidatorPrefs::default());
|
|
Nominators::<Test>::insert(
|
|
987654321,
|
|
Nominations { targets: vec![], submitted_in: Default::default(), suppressed: false },
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn min_bond_checks_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(100)
|
|
.balance_factor(100)
|
|
.min_nominator_bond(1_000)
|
|
.min_validator_bond(1_500)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// 500 is not enough for any role
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![1]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(4), ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 1000 is enough for nominator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(3), 500));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![1]));
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(4), ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 1500 is enough for validator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(3), 500));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![1]));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(4), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
// Can't unbond anything as validator
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(4), 500), Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond);
|
|
|
|
// Once they are a nominator, they can unbond 500
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![1]));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(4), 500));
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(4), 500), Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond);
|
|
|
|
// Once they are chilled they can unbond everything
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(Origin::signed(4)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(4), 1000));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn chill_other_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(100)
|
|
.balance_factor(100)
|
|
.min_nominator_bond(1_000)
|
|
.min_validator_bond(1_500)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let initial_validators = CounterForValidators::<Test>::get();
|
|
let initial_nominators = CounterForNominators::<Test>::get();
|
|
for i in 0..15 {
|
|
let a = 4 * i;
|
|
let b = 4 * i + 1;
|
|
let c = 4 * i + 2;
|
|
let d = 4 * i + 3;
|
|
Balances::make_free_balance_be(&a, 100_000);
|
|
Balances::make_free_balance_be(&b, 100_000);
|
|
Balances::make_free_balance_be(&c, 100_000);
|
|
Balances::make_free_balance_be(&d, 100_000);
|
|
|
|
// Nominator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
Origin::signed(a),
|
|
b,
|
|
1000,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(b), vec![1]));
|
|
|
|
// Validator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
Origin::signed(c),
|
|
d,
|
|
1500,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(d), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// To chill other users, we need to:
|
|
// * Set a minimum bond amount
|
|
// * Set a limit
|
|
// * Set a threshold
|
|
//
|
|
// If any of these are missing, we do not have enough information to allow the
|
|
// `chill_other` to succeed from one user to another.
|
|
|
|
// Can't chill these users
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(Origin::signed(1337), 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(Origin::signed(1337), 3),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Change the minimum bond... but no limits.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_limits(Origin::root(), 1_500, 2_000, None, None, None));
|
|
|
|
// Still can't chill these users
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(Origin::signed(1337), 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(Origin::signed(1337), 3),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Add limits, but no threshold
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_limits(
|
|
Origin::root(),
|
|
1_500,
|
|
2_000,
|
|
Some(10),
|
|
Some(10),
|
|
None
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// Still can't chill these users
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(Origin::signed(1337), 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(Origin::signed(1337), 3),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Add threshold, but no limits
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_limits(
|
|
Origin::root(),
|
|
1_500,
|
|
2_000,
|
|
None,
|
|
None,
|
|
Some(Percent::from_percent(0))
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// Still can't chill these users
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(Origin::signed(1337), 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(Origin::signed(1337), 3),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Add threshold and limits
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_limits(
|
|
Origin::root(),
|
|
1_500,
|
|
2_000,
|
|
Some(10),
|
|
Some(10),
|
|
Some(Percent::from_percent(75))
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// 16 people total because tests start with 2 active one
|
|
assert_eq!(CounterForNominators::<Test>::get(), 15 + initial_nominators);
|
|
assert_eq!(CounterForValidators::<Test>::get(), 15 + initial_validators);
|
|
|
|
// Users can now be chilled down to 7 people, so we try to remove 9 of them (starting
|
|
// with 16)
|
|
for i in 6..15 {
|
|
let b = 4 * i + 1;
|
|
let d = 4 * i + 3;
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill_other(Origin::signed(1337), b));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill_other(Origin::signed(1337), d));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// chill a nominator. Limit is not reached, not chill-able
|
|
assert_eq!(CounterForNominators::<Test>::get(), 7);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(Origin::signed(1337), 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
// chill a validator. Limit is reached, chill-able.
|
|
assert_eq!(CounterForValidators::<Test>::get(), 9);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill_other(Origin::signed(1337), 3));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn capped_stakers_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let validator_count = CounterForValidators::<Test>::get();
|
|
assert_eq!(validator_count, 3);
|
|
let nominator_count = CounterForNominators::<Test>::get();
|
|
assert_eq!(nominator_count, 1);
|
|
|
|
// Change the maximums
|
|
let max = 10;
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_limits(
|
|
Origin::root(),
|
|
10,
|
|
10,
|
|
Some(max),
|
|
Some(max),
|
|
Some(Percent::from_percent(0))
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// can create `max - validator_count` validators
|
|
let mut some_existing_validator = AccountId::default();
|
|
for i in 0..max - validator_count {
|
|
let (_, controller) = testing_utils::create_stash_controller::<Test>(
|
|
i + 10_000_000,
|
|
100,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller,
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(controller), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
some_existing_validator = controller;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// but no more
|
|
let (_, last_validator) = testing_utils::create_stash_controller::<Test>(
|
|
1337,
|
|
100,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller,
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(last_validator), ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::TooManyValidators,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// same with nominators
|
|
let mut some_existing_nominator = AccountId::default();
|
|
for i in 0..max - nominator_count {
|
|
let (_, controller) = testing_utils::create_stash_controller::<Test>(
|
|
i + 20_000_000,
|
|
100,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller,
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(controller), vec![1]));
|
|
some_existing_nominator = controller;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// one more is too many
|
|
let (_, last_nominator) = testing_utils::create_stash_controller::<Test>(
|
|
30_000_000,
|
|
100,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller,
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(last_nominator), vec![1]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::TooManyNominators
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-nominate works fine
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(some_existing_nominator), vec![1]));
|
|
// Re-validate works fine
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(
|
|
Origin::signed(some_existing_validator),
|
|
ValidatorPrefs::default()
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// No problem when we set to `None` again
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_limits(Origin::root(), 10, 10, None, None, None));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(last_nominator), vec![1]));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(last_validator), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mod sorted_list_provider {
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
use frame_election_provider_support::SortedListProvider;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn re_nominate_does_not_change_counters_or_list() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// given
|
|
let pre_insert_nominator_count = Nominators::<Test>::iter().count() as u32;
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Config>::SortedListProvider::count(), pre_insert_nominator_count);
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::contains_key(101));
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Config>::SortedListProvider::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), vec![101]);
|
|
|
|
// when account 101 renominates
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(100), vec![41]));
|
|
|
|
// then counts don't change
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Config>::SortedListProvider::count(), pre_insert_nominator_count);
|
|
assert_eq!(Nominators::<Test>::iter().count() as u32, pre_insert_nominator_count);
|
|
// and the list is the same
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Config>::SortedListProvider::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), vec![101]);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|