Files
pezkuwi-subxt/substrate/frame/contracts
Peter Goodspeed-Niklaus 44d5aba80d Create a macro which automates creation of benchmark test suites. (#8104)
* Create a macro which automates creation of benchmark test suites.

* bump impl_version

* allow unused on test_bench_by_name

* use proper doctest ignore attribute

* Explicitly hand the Module to the test suite

Much better practice than depending on it showing up implicitly in
the namespace.

* explicitly import what we need into `mod tests`

* bench_module is `ident` not `tt`

Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com>

* allow end users to specify arguments for new_test_ext

This turned out to be surprisingly easy. On reflection, it turns out
that of course the compiler can't eagerly evaluate the function call,
but needs to paste it in everywhere desired.

* enable explicitly specifying the path to the benchmarks invocation

also enable optional trailing commas

* Revert "bump impl_version"

This reverts commit 0209e4de33fd43873f8cfc6875815d0fd6151e63.

* list failing benchmark tests and the errors which caused the failure

* harden benchmark tests against internal panics

* suppress warning about ignored profiles

unfortunately, setting the profile here doesn't do anything; we'd
need to set it in every leaf package anyway. However, as this was
just making the default explicit anyway, I think it's safe enough
to remove entirely.

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for assets

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for balances

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for bounties

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for Collective

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for Contracts

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for Democracy

* don't impl_benchmark_test_suite for Elections-Phragmen

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for Identity

Note that Identity tests currently fail. They failed in an identical
way before this change, so as far as I'm concerned, the status quo is
good enough for now.

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for ImOnline

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for indices

For this crate also, the test suite fails identically with and without
this change, so we can say that this change is not the cause of the
tests' failure to compile.

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for lottery

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for merkle-mountain-range

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for Multisig

These tests fail identically with and without the change, so the change
seems unlikely to be the origin of the failures.

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for offences

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for Proxy

Fails identically with and without this change.

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for scheduler

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for session

It turns out to be important to be able to exclude items marked
`#[extra]` sometimes. Who knew?

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for staking

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for system

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for timestamp

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for tips

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for treasury

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for utility

Note that benchmark tests fail identically before and after this change.

* impl_benchmark_test_suite for vesting

* fix wrong module name in impl_benchmark_test_suite in Offences

* address line length nits

* enable optional keyword argument: exec_name

Took a _lot_ of macro-wrangling to get the functionality that I want,
but now you have the option to pass in

```rust
impl_benchmark_test_suite!(
	Elections,
	crate::tests::ExtBuilder::default().desired_members(13).desired_runners_up(7),
	crate::tests::Test,
	exec_name = build_and_execute,
);
```

and have it expand out properly. A selected fragment of the expansion:

```rust
        fn test_benchmarks() {
            crate::tests::ExtBuilder::default()
                .desired_members(13)
                .desired_runners_up(7)
                .build_and_execute(|| {
```

* get rid of dead code

Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com>
2021-02-16 10:01:20 +01:00
..
2021-02-10 19:23:18 +01:00
2021-01-04 09:03:13 +00:00
2021-02-10 19:23:18 +01:00
2021-02-10 19:23:18 +01:00

Contract Module

The Contract module provides functionality for the runtime to deploy and execute WebAssembly smart-contracts.

Overview

This module extends accounts based on the Currency trait to have smart-contract functionality. It can be used with other modules that implement accounts based on Currency. These "smart-contract accounts" have the ability to instantiate smart-contracts and make calls to other contract and non-contract accounts.

The smart-contract code is stored once in a code_cache, and later retrievable via its code_hash. This means that multiple smart-contracts can be instantiated from the same code_cache, without replicating the code each time.

When a smart-contract is called, its associated code is retrieved via the code hash and gets executed. This call can alter the storage entries of the smart-contract account, instantiate new smart-contracts, or call other smart-contracts.

Finally, when an account is reaped, its associated code and storage of the smart-contract account will also be deleted.

Gas

Senders must specify a gas limit with every call, as all instructions invoked by the smart-contract require gas. Unused gas is refunded after the call, regardless of the execution outcome.

If the gas limit is reached, then all calls and state changes (including balance transfers) are only reverted at the current call's contract level. For example, if contract A calls B and B runs out of gas mid-call, then all of B's calls are reverted. Assuming correct error handling by contract A, A's other calls and state changes still persist.

Notable Scenarios

Contract call failures are not always cascading. When failures occur in a sub-call, they do not "bubble up", and the call will only revert at the specific contract level. For example, if contract A calls contract B, and B fails, A can decide how to handle that failure, either proceeding or reverting A's changes.

Interface

Dispatchable functions

Those are documented in the reference documentation of the Module.

Usage

The Contract module is a work in progress. The following examples show how this Contract module can be used to instantiate and call contracts.

  • ink is an eDSL that enables writing WebAssembly based smart contracts in the Rust programming language. This is a work in progress.

License: Apache-2.0