mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-05-06 04:28:01 +00:00
Peter Goodspeed-Niklaus
44d5aba80d
* Create a macro which automates creation of benchmark test suites. * bump impl_version * allow unused on test_bench_by_name * use proper doctest ignore attribute * Explicitly hand the Module to the test suite Much better practice than depending on it showing up implicitly in the namespace. * explicitly import what we need into `mod tests` * bench_module is `ident` not `tt` Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> * allow end users to specify arguments for new_test_ext This turned out to be surprisingly easy. On reflection, it turns out that of course the compiler can't eagerly evaluate the function call, but needs to paste it in everywhere desired. * enable explicitly specifying the path to the benchmarks invocation also enable optional trailing commas * Revert "bump impl_version" This reverts commit 0209e4de33fd43873f8cfc6875815d0fd6151e63. * list failing benchmark tests and the errors which caused the failure * harden benchmark tests against internal panics * suppress warning about ignored profiles unfortunately, setting the profile here doesn't do anything; we'd need to set it in every leaf package anyway. However, as this was just making the default explicit anyway, I think it's safe enough to remove entirely. * impl_benchmark_test_suite for assets * impl_benchmark_test_suite for balances * impl_benchmark_test_suite for bounties * impl_benchmark_test_suite for Collective * impl_benchmark_test_suite for Contracts * impl_benchmark_test_suite for Democracy * don't impl_benchmark_test_suite for Elections-Phragmen * impl_benchmark_test_suite for Identity Note that Identity tests currently fail. They failed in an identical way before this change, so as far as I'm concerned, the status quo is good enough for now. * impl_benchmark_test_suite for ImOnline * impl_benchmark_test_suite for indices For this crate also, the test suite fails identically with and without this change, so we can say that this change is not the cause of the tests' failure to compile. * impl_benchmark_test_suite for lottery * impl_benchmark_test_suite for merkle-mountain-range * impl_benchmark_test_suite for Multisig These tests fail identically with and without the change, so the change seems unlikely to be the origin of the failures. * impl_benchmark_test_suite for offences * impl_benchmark_test_suite for Proxy Fails identically with and without this change. * impl_benchmark_test_suite for scheduler * impl_benchmark_test_suite for session It turns out to be important to be able to exclude items marked `#[extra]` sometimes. Who knew? * impl_benchmark_test_suite for staking * impl_benchmark_test_suite for system * impl_benchmark_test_suite for timestamp * impl_benchmark_test_suite for tips * impl_benchmark_test_suite for treasury * impl_benchmark_test_suite for utility Note that benchmark tests fail identically before and after this change. * impl_benchmark_test_suite for vesting * fix wrong module name in impl_benchmark_test_suite in Offences * address line length nits * enable optional keyword argument: exec_name Took a _lot_ of macro-wrangling to get the functionality that I want, but now you have the option to pass in ```rust impl_benchmark_test_suite!( Elections, crate::tests::ExtBuilder::default().desired_members(13).desired_runners_up(7), crate::tests::Test, exec_name = build_and_execute, ); ``` and have it expand out properly. A selected fragment of the expansion: ```rust fn test_benchmarks() { crate::tests::ExtBuilder::default() .desired_members(13) .desired_runners_up(7) .build_and_execute(|| { ``` * get rid of dead code Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com>
Identity Module
Overview
A federated naming system, allowing for multiple registrars to be added from a specified origin.
Registrars can set a fee to provide identity-verification service. Anyone can put forth a
proposed identity for a fixed deposit and ask for review by any number of registrars (paying
each of their fees). Registrar judgements are given as an enum, allowing for sophisticated,
multi-tier opinions.
Some judgements are identified as sticky, which means they cannot be removed except by complete removal of the identity, or by the registrar. Judgements are allowed to represent a portion of funds that have been reserved for the registrar.
A super-user can remove accounts and in doing so, slash the deposit.
All accounts may also have a limited number of sub-accounts which may be specified by the owner; by definition, these have equivalent ownership and each has an individual name.
The number of registrars should be limited, and the deposit made sufficiently large, to ensure no state-bloat attack is viable.
Interface
Dispatchable Functions
For general users
set_identity- Set the associated identity of an account; a small deposit is reserved if not already taken.clear_identity- Remove an account's associated identity; the deposit is returned.request_judgement- Request a judgement from a registrar, paying a fee.cancel_request- Cancel the previous request for a judgement.
For general users with sub-identities
set_subs- Set the sub-accounts of an identity.add_sub- Add a sub-identity to an identity.remove_sub- Remove a sub-identity of an identity.rename_sub- Rename a sub-identity of an identity.quit_sub- Remove a sub-identity of an identity (called by the sub-identity).
For registrars
set_fee- Set the fee required to be paid for a judgement to be given by the registrar.set_fields- Set the fields that a registrar cares about in their judgements.provide_judgement- Provide a judgement to an identity.
For super-users
add_registrar- Add a new registrar to the system.kill_identity- Forcibly remove the associated identity; the deposit is lost.
License: Apache-2.0