mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-04-26 23:57:56 +00:00
2e76e2a74d
* Don't populate runtime events in genesis * typo * Change to block zero * Fix vesting tests * Update frame/system/src/lib.rs Co-Authored-By: Bastian Köcher <bkchr@users.noreply.github.com> * Update frame/system/src/lib.rs Co-Authored-By: Bastian Köcher <bkchr@users.noreply.github.com> * Add test * Fix test * Fix contract tests * Fix phragmen tests * Fix Generic Assets Tests * Fix offences tests * Fix im-online * fix recovery * Fix utility tests * Shorter * Use ext Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <bkchr@users.noreply.github.com>
4127 lines
124 KiB
Rust
4127 lines
124 KiB
Rust
// Copyright 2017-2020 Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
|
|
// This file is part of Substrate.
|
|
|
|
// Substrate is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
|
|
// (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
// Substrate is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
// GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
// along with Substrate. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
|
|
|
//! Tests for the module.
|
|
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
use mock::*;
|
|
use sp_runtime::{
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate, traits::BadOrigin,
|
|
};
|
|
use sp_staking::offence::OffenceDetails;
|
|
use frame_support::{
|
|
assert_ok, assert_noop, StorageMap,
|
|
traits::{Currency, ReservableCurrency, OnInitialize},
|
|
};
|
|
use pallet_balances::Error as BalancesError;
|
|
use substrate_test_utils::assert_eq_uvec;
|
|
use crate::Store;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn force_unstake_works() {
|
|
// Verifies initial conditions of mock
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Account 11 is stashed and locked, and account 10 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Cant transfer
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 1, 10),
|
|
BalancesError::<Test, _>::LiquidityRestrictions
|
|
);
|
|
// Force unstake requires root.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::force_unstake(Origin::signed(11), 11), BadOrigin);
|
|
// We now force them to unstake
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::force_unstake(Origin::ROOT, 11));
|
|
// No longer bonded.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), None);
|
|
// Transfer works.
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 1, 10));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn basic_setup_works() {
|
|
// Verifies initial conditions of mock
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Account 11 is stashed and locked, and account 10 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Account 21 is stashed and locked, and account 20 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&21), Some(20));
|
|
// Account 1 is not a stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&1), None);
|
|
|
|
// Account 10 controls the stash from account 11, which is 100 * balance_factor units
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger { stash: 11, total: 1000, active: 1000, unlocking: vec![], last_reward: None })
|
|
);
|
|
// Account 20 controls the stash from account 21, which is 200 * balance_factor units
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger { stash: 21, total: 1000, active: 1000, unlocking: vec![], last_reward: None })
|
|
);
|
|
// Account 1 does not control any stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&1), None);
|
|
|
|
// ValidatorPrefs are default
|
|
assert_eq!(<Validators<Test>>::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), vec![
|
|
(31, ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
(21, ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
(11, ValidatorPrefs::default())
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(100),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger { stash: 101, total: 500, active: 500, unlocking: vec![], last_reward: None })
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 1125,
|
|
own: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![ IndividualExposure { who: 101, value: 125 }]
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21),
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 1375,
|
|
own: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![ IndividualExposure { who: 101, value: 375 }]
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
// initial slot_stake
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_total_stake(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index), 2500);
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The number of validators required.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Initial Era and session
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 0);
|
|
|
|
// Account 10 has `balance_factor` free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// New era is not being forced
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
|
|
// All exposures must be correct.
|
|
check_exposure_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
check_nominator_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn change_controller_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
// 10 can control 11 who is initially a validator.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10)));
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_controller(Origin::signed(11), 5));
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(10), ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotController,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(5), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rewards_should_work() {
|
|
// should check that:
|
|
// * rewards get recorded per session
|
|
// * rewards get paid per Era
|
|
// * Check that nominators are also rewarded
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let init_balance_10 = Balances::total_balance(&10);
|
|
let init_balance_11 = Balances::total_balance(&11);
|
|
let init_balance_20 = Balances::total_balance(&20);
|
|
let init_balance_21 = Balances::total_balance(&21);
|
|
let init_balance_100 = Balances::total_balance(&100);
|
|
let init_balance_101 = Balances::total_balance(&101);
|
|
|
|
// Check state
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(21, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(101, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 50)]);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 50)]);
|
|
// This is the second validator of the current elected set.
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 50)]);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3 * 1000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 10); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), init_balance_10);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), init_balance_11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&20), init_balance_20);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&21), init_balance_21);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&100), init_balance_100);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&101), init_balance_101);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_reward_points(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index), EraRewardPoints {
|
|
total: 50*3,
|
|
individual: vec![(11, 100), (21, 50)].into_iter().collect(),
|
|
});
|
|
let part_for_10 = Perbill::from_rational_approximation::<u32>(1000, 1125);
|
|
let part_for_20 = Perbill::from_rational_approximation::<u32>(1000, 1375);
|
|
let part_for_100_from_10 = Perbill::from_rational_approximation::<u32>(125, 1125);
|
|
let part_for_100_from_20 = Perbill::from_rational_approximation::<u32>(375, 1375);
|
|
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&10), init_balance_10 + part_for_10 * total_payout_0*2/3, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&11), init_balance_11, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&20), init_balance_20 + part_for_20 * total_payout_0*1/3, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&21), init_balance_21, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&100),
|
|
init_balance_100
|
|
+ part_for_100_from_10 * total_payout_0 * 2/3
|
|
+ part_for_100_from_20 * total_payout_0 * 1/3,
|
|
2
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&101), init_balance_101, 2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3 * 1000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 > 10); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&10), init_balance_10 + part_for_10 * (total_payout_0 * 2/3 + total_payout_1), 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&11), init_balance_11, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&20), init_balance_20 + part_for_20 * total_payout_0 * 1/3, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&21), init_balance_21, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&100),
|
|
init_balance_100
|
|
+ part_for_100_from_10 * (total_payout_0 * 2/3 + total_payout_1)
|
|
+ part_for_100_from_20 * total_payout_0 * 1/3,
|
|
2
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&101), init_balance_101, 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn staking_should_work() {
|
|
// should test:
|
|
// * new validators can be added to the default set
|
|
// * new ones will be chosen per era
|
|
// * either one can unlock the stash and back-down from being a validator via `chill`ing.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.fair(false) // to give 20 more staked value
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// --- Block 1:
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
|
|
// remember + compare this along with the test.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..5 { let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&i, 2000); }
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 2:
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
// add a new candidate for being a validator. account 3 controlled by 4.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 1500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
let current_era_at_bond = Staking::current_era();
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(4), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
// No effects will be seen so far.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 3:
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
|
|
// No effects will be seen so far. Era has not been yet triggered.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 4: the validators will now be queued.
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 1);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 5: the validators are still in queue.
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 6: the validators will now be changed.
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 4]);
|
|
// --- Block 6: Unstake 4 as a validator, freeing up the balance stashed in 3
|
|
// 4 will chill
|
|
Staking::chill(Origin::signed(4)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 7: nothing. 4 is still there.
|
|
start_session(7);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 4]);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 8:
|
|
start_session(8);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 9: 4 will not be a validator.
|
|
start_session(9);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// Note: the stashed value of 4 is still lock
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&4),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 3,
|
|
total: 1500,
|
|
active: 1500,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: current_era_at_bond,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// e.g. it cannot spend more than 500 that it has free from the total 2000
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::reserve(&3, 501),
|
|
BalancesError::<Test, _>::LiquidityRestrictions
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&3, 409));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn less_than_needed_candidates_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.num_validators(3)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::minimum_validator_count(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![30, 20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Previous set is selected. NO election algorithm is even executed.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![30, 20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// But the exposure is updated in a simple way. No external votes exists.
|
|
// This is purely self-vote.
|
|
assert!(
|
|
ErasStakers::<Test>::iter_prefix(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index)
|
|
.all(|exposure| exposure.others.is_empty())
|
|
);
|
|
check_exposure_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
check_nominator_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn no_candidate_emergency_condition() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(15)
|
|
.num_validators(4)
|
|
.validator_pool(true)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// initial validators
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![10, 20, 30, 40]);
|
|
let prefs = ValidatorPrefs { commission: Perbill::one() };
|
|
<Staking as crate::Store>::Validators::insert(11, prefs.clone());
|
|
|
|
// set the minimum validator count.
|
|
<Staking as crate::Store>::MinimumValidatorCount::put(10);
|
|
|
|
// try to chill
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
|
|
// trigger era
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Previous ones are elected. chill is invalidates. TODO: #2494
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![10, 20, 30, 40]);
|
|
// Though the validator preferences has been removed.
|
|
assert!(Staking::validators(11) != prefs);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn nominating_and_rewards_should_work() {
|
|
// PHRAGMEN OUTPUT: running this test with the reference impl gives:
|
|
//
|
|
// Sequential Phragmén gives
|
|
// 10 is elected with stake 2200.0 and score 0.0003333333333333333
|
|
// 20 is elected with stake 1800.0 and score 0.0005555555555555556
|
|
|
|
// 10 has load 0.0003333333333333333 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 20 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 20 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 30 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 30 with stake 0
|
|
// 40 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 40 with stake 0
|
|
// 2 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 600.0 20 with stake 400.0 30 with stake 0.0
|
|
// 4 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 600.0 20 with stake 400.0 40 with stake 0.0
|
|
|
|
// Sequential Phragmén with post processing gives
|
|
// 10 is elected with stake 2000.0 and score 0.0003333333333333333
|
|
// 20 is elected with stake 2000.0 and score 0.0005555555555555556
|
|
|
|
// 10 has load 0.0003333333333333333 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 20 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 20 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 30 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 30 with stake 0
|
|
// 40 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 40 with stake 0
|
|
// 2 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 400.0 20 with stake 600.0 30 with stake 0
|
|
// 4 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 600.0 20 with stake 400.0 40 with stake 0.0
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.validator_pool(true)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// initial validators -- everyone is actually even.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![40, 30]);
|
|
|
|
// Set payee to controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(20), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(30), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(40), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// give the man some money
|
|
let initial_balance = 1000;
|
|
for i in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 20, 21].iter() {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(i, initial_balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// bond two account pairs and state interest in nomination.
|
|
// 2 will nominate for 10, 20, 30
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![11, 21, 31]));
|
|
// 4 will nominate for 10, 20, 40
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![11, 21, 41]));
|
|
|
|
// the total reward for era 0
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 100); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(41, 1)]);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(31, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// 10 and 20 have more votes, they will be chosen by phragmen.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// OLD validators must have already received some rewards.
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&40), 1 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&30), 1 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
|
|
// ------ check the staked value of all parties.
|
|
|
|
// 30 and 40 are not chosen anymore
|
|
assert_eq!(ErasStakers::<Test>::iter_prefix(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index).count(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 1000 + 800,
|
|
own: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 3, value: 400 },
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 1, value: 400 },
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21),
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 1000 + 1200,
|
|
own: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 3, value: 600 },
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 1, value: 600 },
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// the total reward for era 1
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 > 100); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 2)]);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// nothing else will happen, era ends and rewards are paid again,
|
|
// it is expected that nominators will also be paid. See below
|
|
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
let payout_for_10 = total_payout_1 / 3;
|
|
let payout_for_20 = 2 * total_payout_1 / 3;
|
|
// Nominator 2: has [400/1800 ~ 2/9 from 10] + [600/2200 ~ 3/11 from 20]'s reward. ==> 2/9 + 3/11
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&2),
|
|
initial_balance + (2 * payout_for_10 / 9 + 3 * payout_for_20 / 11),
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
// Nominator 4: has [400/1800 ~ 2/9 from 10] + [600/2200 ~ 3/11 from 20]'s reward. ==> 2/9 + 3/11
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&4),
|
|
initial_balance + (2 * payout_for_10 / 9 + 3 * payout_for_20 / 11),
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Validator 10: got 800 / 1800 external stake => 8/18 =? 4/9 => Validator's share = 5/9
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&10),
|
|
initial_balance + 5 * payout_for_10 / 9,
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
// Validator 20: got 1200 / 2200 external stake => 12/22 =? 6/11 => Validator's share = 5/11
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&20),
|
|
initial_balance + 5 * payout_for_20 / 11,
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
check_exposure_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
check_nominator_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn nominators_also_get_slashed() {
|
|
// A nominator should be slashed if the validator they nominated is slashed
|
|
// Here is the breakdown of roles:
|
|
// 10 - is the controller of 11
|
|
// 11 - is the stash.
|
|
// 2 - is the nominator of 20, 10
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Set payee to controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// give the man some money.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1000;
|
|
for i in [1, 2, 3, 10].iter() {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(i, initial_balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 2 will nominate for 10, 20
|
|
let nominator_stake = 500;
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, nominator_stake, RewardDestination::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![20, 10]));
|
|
|
|
let total_payout = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout > 100); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// new era, pay rewards,
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Nominator stash didn't collect any.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), initial_balance);
|
|
|
|
// 10 goes offline
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(5)],
|
|
);
|
|
let expo = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11);
|
|
let slash_value = 50;
|
|
let total_slash = expo.total.min(slash_value);
|
|
let validator_slash = expo.own.min(total_slash);
|
|
let nominator_slash = nominator_stake.min(total_slash - validator_slash);
|
|
|
|
// initial + first era reward + slash
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), initial_balance - validator_slash);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), initial_balance - nominator_slash);
|
|
check_exposure_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
check_nominator_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
// Because slashing happened.
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(10));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn double_staking_should_fail() {
|
|
// should test (in the same order):
|
|
// * an account already bonded as stash cannot be be stashed again.
|
|
// * an account already bonded as stash cannot nominate.
|
|
// * an account already bonded as controller can nominate.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let arbitrary_value = 5;
|
|
// 2 = controller, 1 stashed => ok
|
|
assert_ok!(
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, arbitrary_value,
|
|
RewardDestination::default())
|
|
);
|
|
// 4 = not used so far, 1 stashed => not allowed.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 4, arbitrary_value,
|
|
RewardDestination::default()), Error::<Test>::AlreadyBonded,
|
|
);
|
|
// 1 = stashed => attempting to nominate should fail.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(1), vec![1]), Error::<Test>::NotController);
|
|
// 2 = controller => nominating should work.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![1]));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn double_controlling_should_fail() {
|
|
// should test (in the same order):
|
|
// * an account already bonded as controller CANNOT be reused as the controller of another account.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let arbitrary_value = 5;
|
|
// 2 = controller, 1 stashed => ok
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
Origin::signed(1),
|
|
2,
|
|
arbitrary_value,
|
|
RewardDestination::default(),
|
|
));
|
|
// 2 = controller, 3 stashed (Note that 2 is reused.) => no-op
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 2, arbitrary_value, RewardDestination::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyPaired,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn session_and_eras_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Session 1: No change.
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 0);
|
|
|
|
// Session 2: No change.
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 0);
|
|
|
|
// Session 3: Era increment.
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 1);
|
|
|
|
// Session 4: No change.
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 1);
|
|
|
|
// Session 5: No change.
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 1);
|
|
|
|
// Session 6: Era increment.
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn forcing_new_era_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// normal flow of session.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 0);
|
|
start_session(0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 0);
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 0);
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 0);
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 1);
|
|
|
|
// no era change.
|
|
ForceEra::put(Forcing::ForceNone);
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 1);
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 1);
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 1);
|
|
start_session(7);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 1);
|
|
|
|
// back to normal.
|
|
// this immediately starts a new session.
|
|
ForceEra::put(Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
start_session(8);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 1); // There is one session delay
|
|
start_session(9);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 2);
|
|
|
|
// forceful change
|
|
ForceEra::put(Forcing::ForceAlways);
|
|
start_session(10);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 2); // There is one session delay
|
|
start_session(11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 3);
|
|
start_session(12);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 4);
|
|
|
|
// just one forceful change
|
|
ForceEra::put(Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
start_session(13);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(ForceEra::get(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
start_session(14);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 6);
|
|
start_session(15);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 6);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_transfer_staked_balance() {
|
|
// Tests that a stash account cannot transfer funds
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 11 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Confirm account 11 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 (via controller 10) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11).total, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 cannot transfer as a result
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 20, 1),
|
|
BalancesError::<Test, _>::LiquidityRestrictions
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 extra free balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 10000);
|
|
// Confirm that account 11 can now transfer some balance
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 20, 1));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_transfer_staked_balance_2() {
|
|
// Tests that a stash account cannot transfer funds
|
|
// Same test as above but with 20, and more accurate.
|
|
// 21 has 2000 free balance but 1000 at stake
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).fair(true).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 21 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&21), Some(20));
|
|
// Confirm account 21 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
// Confirm account 21 (via controller 20) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21).total, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 21 can transfer at most 1000
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(21), 20, 1001),
|
|
BalancesError::<Test, _>::LiquidityRestrictions
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(21), 20, 1000));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_reserve_staked_balance() {
|
|
// Checks that a bonded account cannot reserve balance from free balance
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 11 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Confirm account 11 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 (via controller 10) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11).own, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 cannot transfer as a result
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::reserve(&11, 1),
|
|
BalancesError::<Test, _>::LiquidityRestrictions
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 extra free balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 10000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 can now reserve balance
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&11, 1));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_destination_works() {
|
|
// Rewards go to the correct destination as determined in Payee
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Check that account 11 is a validator
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
// Check the balance of the validator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// Check how much is at stake
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 100); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Staked (default)
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Staked);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the stash account of validator
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000 + total_payout_0);
|
|
// Check that amount at stake increased accordingly
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
active: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: Some(0),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
//Change RewardDestination to Stash
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 > 100); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000 + total_payout_0 + total_payout_1);
|
|
// Record this value
|
|
let recorded_stash_balance = 1000 + total_payout_0 + total_payout_1;
|
|
// Check that amount at stake is NOT increased
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
active: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: Some(1),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Change RewardDestination to Controller
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
// Check controller balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_2 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_2 > 100); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(2);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the controller account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1 + total_payout_2);
|
|
// Check that amount at stake is NOT increased
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
active: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: Some(2),
|
|
}));
|
|
// Check that amount in staked account is NOT increased.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), recorded_stash_balance);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn validator_payment_prefs_work() {
|
|
// Test that validator preferences are correctly honored
|
|
// Note: unstake threshold is being directly tested in slashing tests.
|
|
// This test will focus on validator payment.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let commission = Perbill::from_percent(40);
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::insert(&11, ValidatorPrefs {
|
|
commission: commission.clone(),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Reward controller so staked ratio doesn't change.
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&101, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
let balance_era_1_10 = Balances::total_balance(&10);
|
|
let balance_era_1_100 = Balances::total_balance(&100);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 > 100); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
let exposure_1 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
let taken_cut = commission * total_payout_1;
|
|
let shared_cut = total_payout_1 - taken_cut;
|
|
let reward_of_10 = shared_cut * exposure_1.own / exposure_1.total + taken_cut;
|
|
let reward_of_100 = shared_cut * exposure_1.others[0].value / exposure_1.total;
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&10), balance_era_1_10 + reward_of_10, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&100), balance_era_1_100 + reward_of_100, 2);
|
|
|
|
check_exposure_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
check_nominator_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_extra_works() {
|
|
// Tests that extra `free_balance` in the stash can be added to stake
|
|
// NOTE: this tests only verifies `StakingLedger` for correct updates
|
|
// See `bond_extra_and_withdraw_unbonded_works` for more details and updates on `Exposure`.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Check that account 10 is a validator
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
// Check that account 10 is bonded to account 11
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Check how much is at stake
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// Call the bond_extra function from controller, add only 100
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(11), 100));
|
|
// There should be 100 more `total` and `active` in the ledger
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Call the bond_extra function with a large number, should handle it
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(11), u64::max_value()));
|
|
// The full amount of the funds should now be in the total and active
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000000,
|
|
active: 1000000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
}));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_extra_and_withdraw_unbonded_works() {
|
|
// * Should test
|
|
// * Given an account being bonded [and chosen as a validator](not mandatory)
|
|
// * It can add extra funds to the bonded account.
|
|
// * it can unbond a portion of its funds from the stash account.
|
|
// * Once the unbonding period is done, it can actually take the funds out of the stash.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// Initial config should be correct
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// check the balance of a validator accounts.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
}));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11), Exposure { total: 1000, own: 1000, others: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// deposit the extra 100 units
|
|
Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(11), 100).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
}));
|
|
// Exposure is a snapshot! only updated after the next era update.
|
|
assert_ne!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11), Exposure { total: 1000 + 100, own: 1000 + 100, others: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 2);
|
|
|
|
// ledger should be the same.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
}));
|
|
// Exposure is now updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11), Exposure { total: 1000 + 100, own: 1000 + 100, others: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1000).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11, total: 1000 + 100, active: 100, unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk{ value: 1000, era: 2 + 3}], last_reward: None })
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Attempting to free the balances now will fail. 2 eras need to pass.
|
|
Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10)).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11, total: 1000 + 100, active: 100, unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk{ value: 1000, era: 2 + 3}], last_reward: None }));
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// nothing yet
|
|
Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10)).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11, total: 1000 + 100, active: 100, unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk{ value: 1000, era: 2 + 3}], last_reward: None }));
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
start_era(5);
|
|
|
|
Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10)).unwrap();
|
|
// Now the value is free and the staking ledger is updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11, total: 100, active: 100, unlocking: vec![], last_reward: None }));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn too_many_unbond_calls_should_not_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// locked at era 0 until 3
|
|
for _ in 0..MAX_UNLOCKING_CHUNKS-1 {
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// locked at era 1 until 4
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
// can't do more.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1), Error::<Test>::NoMoreChunks);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1), Error::<Test>::NoMoreChunks);
|
|
// free up.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10)));
|
|
|
|
// Can add again.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10).unwrap().unlocking.len(), 2);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rebond_works() {
|
|
// * Should test
|
|
// * Given an account being bonded [and chosen as a validator](not mandatory)
|
|
// * it can unbond a portion of its funds from the stash account.
|
|
// * it can re-bond a portion of the funds scheduled to unlock.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 2);
|
|
|
|
// Try to rebond some funds. We get an error since no fund is unbonded.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 500),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NoUnlockChunk,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk {
|
|
value: 900,
|
|
era: 2 + 3,
|
|
}],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond all the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 900, era: 5 }],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond part of the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 500).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 600,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 5 }],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond the remainder of the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 500).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond parts of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 5 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 5 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 5 },
|
|
],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond part of the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 500).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 600,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 5 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 100, era: 5 },
|
|
],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rebond_is_fifo() {
|
|
// Rebond should proceed by reversing the most recent bond operations.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond some of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 400).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 600,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond more of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 300,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 3 + 3 },
|
|
],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
start_era(4);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond yet more of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 200).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 3 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 200, era: 4 + 3 },
|
|
],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond half of the unbonding funds.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 400).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 500,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 100, era: 3 + 3 },
|
|
],
|
|
last_reward: None,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_to_stake_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).fair(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Confirm validator count is 2
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
// Confirm account 10 and 20 are validators
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11) && <Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&21));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11).total, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21).total, 2000);
|
|
|
|
// Give the man some money.
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&10, 1000);
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&20, 1000);
|
|
|
|
// Bypass logic and change current exposure
|
|
ErasStakers::<Test>::insert(0, 21, Exposure { total: 69, own: 69, others: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// Now lets lower account 20 stake
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21).total, 69);
|
|
<Ledger<Test>>::insert(&20, StakingLedger { stash: 21, total: 69, active: 69, unlocking: vec![], last_reward: None });
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 100); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// New era --> rewards are paid --> stakes are changed
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11).total, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21).total, 69);
|
|
|
|
let _11_balance = Balances::free_balance(&11);
|
|
assert_eq!(_11_balance, 1000 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
|
|
// Trigger another new era as the info are frozen before the era start.
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// -- new infos
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11).total, 1000 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21).total, 69 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
|
|
check_exposure_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
check_nominator_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn on_free_balance_zero_stash_removes_validator() {
|
|
// Tests that validator storage items are cleaned up when stash is empty
|
|
// Tests that storage items are untouched when controller is empty
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().existential_deposit(10).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Check the balance of the validator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 256);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 256000);
|
|
// Check these two accounts are bonded
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// Set some storage items which we expect to be cleaned up
|
|
// Set payee information
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Stash));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items that should be cleaned up
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of controller to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&10, u64::max_value());
|
|
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account has not been touched
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 256000);
|
|
// Check these two accounts are still bonded
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items have not changed
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of stash to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&11, u64::max_value());
|
|
// Check total balance of stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Reap the stash
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::reap_stash(Origin::NONE, 11));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items do not exist
|
|
assert!(!<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(!<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Nominators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn on_free_balance_zero_stash_removes_nominator() {
|
|
// Tests that nominator storage items are cleaned up when stash is empty
|
|
// Tests that storage items are untouched when controller is empty
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().existential_deposit(10).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Make 10 a nominator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(10), vec![20]));
|
|
// Check that account 10 is a nominator
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
// Check the balance of the nominator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 256);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 256000);
|
|
|
|
// Set payee information
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Stash));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items that should be cleaned up
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of controller to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&10, u64::max_value());
|
|
// Check total balance of account 10
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account has not been touched
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 256000);
|
|
// Check these two accounts are still bonded
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items have not changed
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of stash to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&11, u64::max_value());
|
|
// Check total balance of stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Reap the stash
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::reap_stash(Origin::NONE, 11));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items do not exist
|
|
assert!(!<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(!<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Nominators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn switching_roles() {
|
|
// Test that it should be possible to switch between roles (nominator, validator, idle) with minimal overhead.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Reset reward destination
|
|
for i in &[10, 20] { assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(*i), RewardDestination::Controller)); }
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..7 { let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&i, 5000); }
|
|
|
|
// add 2 nominators
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 2000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![11, 5]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![21, 1]));
|
|
|
|
// add a new validator candidate
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(5), 6, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(6), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// with current nominators 10 and 5 have the most stake
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![6, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// 2 decides to be a validator. Consequences:
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(2), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
// new stakes:
|
|
// 10: 1000 self vote
|
|
// 20: 1000 self vote + 250 vote
|
|
// 6 : 1000 self vote
|
|
// 2 : 2000 self vote + 250 vote.
|
|
// Winners: 20 and 2
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![2, 20]);
|
|
|
|
check_exposure_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
check_nominator_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn wrong_vote_is_null() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).validator_pool(true).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![40, 30]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..3 { let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&i, 5000); }
|
|
|
|
// add 1 nominators
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 2000, RewardDestination::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![
|
|
11, 21, // good votes
|
|
1, 2, 15, 1000, 25 // crap votes. No effect.
|
|
]));
|
|
|
|
// new block
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_no_staked_value() {
|
|
// Behavior when someone bonds with no staked value.
|
|
// Particularly when she votes and the candidate is elected.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(3)
|
|
.existential_deposit(5)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Can't bond with 1
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1, RewardDestination::Controller),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientValue,
|
|
);
|
|
// bonded with absolute minimum value possible.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 5, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
let current_era_at_bond = Staking::current_era();
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1)[0].amount, 5);
|
|
|
|
// unbonding even 1 will cause all to be unbonded.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(2), 1));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(2),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 1,
|
|
active: 0,
|
|
total: 5,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk {value: 5, era: 3}],
|
|
last_reward: current_era_at_bond,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// not yet removed.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(2)));
|
|
assert!(Staking::ledger(2).is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1)[0].amount, 5);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// poof. Account 1 is removed from the staking system.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(2)));
|
|
assert!(Staking::ledger(2).is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1).len(), 0);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_little_staked_value_bounded() {
|
|
// Behavior when someone bonds with little staked value.
|
|
// Particularly when she votes and the candidate is elected.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(3)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// setup
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(Origin::signed(30)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
let init_balance_2 = Balances::free_balance(&2);
|
|
let init_balance_10 = Balances::free_balance(&10);
|
|
|
|
// Stingy validator.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(2), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
// reward era 0
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 100); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
reward_all_elected();
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
// 2 is elected.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10, 2]);
|
|
// And has minimal stake
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 2).total, 0);
|
|
|
|
// Old ones are rewarded.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), init_balance_10 + total_payout_0 / 3);
|
|
// no rewards paid to 2. This was initial election.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(2), init_balance_2);
|
|
|
|
// reward era 1
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 > 100); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
reward_all_elected();
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10, 2]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 2).total, 0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(2), init_balance_2 + total_payout_1 / 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(&10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + total_payout_0 / 3 + total_payout_1 / 3,
|
|
);
|
|
check_exposure_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
check_nominator_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn new_era_elects_correct_number_of_validators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(true)
|
|
.validator_pool(true)
|
|
.fair(true)
|
|
.validator_count(1)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(validator_controllers().len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(validator_controllers().len(), 1);
|
|
check_exposure_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
check_nominator_all(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_should_not_overflow_validators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
|
|
bond_validator(3, 2, u64::max_value());
|
|
bond_validator(5, 4, u64::max_value());
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(7, 6, u64::max_value() / 2, vec![3, 5]);
|
|
bond_nominator(9, 8, u64::max_value() / 2, vec![3, 5]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![4, 2]);
|
|
|
|
// This test will fail this. Will saturate.
|
|
// check_exposure_all();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 3).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 5).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_should_not_overflow_nominators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
|
|
bond_validator(3, 2, u64::max_value() / 2);
|
|
bond_validator(5, 4, u64::max_value() / 2);
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(7, 6, u64::max_value(), vec![3, 5]);
|
|
bond_nominator(9, 8, u64::max_value(), vec![3, 5]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![4, 2]);
|
|
|
|
// Saturate.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 3).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 5).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_should_not_overflow_ultimate() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
bond_validator(3, 2, u64::max_value());
|
|
bond_validator(5, 4, u64::max_value());
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(7, 6, u64::max_value(), vec![3, 5]);
|
|
bond_nominator(9, 8, u64::max_value(), vec![3, 5]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![4, 2]);
|
|
|
|
// Saturate.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 3).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 5).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_validator_slashing_validator_doesnt_overflow() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let stake = u32::max_value() as u64 * 2;
|
|
let reward_slash = u32::max_value() as u64 * 2;
|
|
|
|
// Assert multiplication overflows in balance arithmetic.
|
|
assert!(stake.checked_mul(reward_slash).is_none());
|
|
|
|
// Set staker
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, stake);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Exposure::<AccountId, Balance> { total: stake, own: stake, others: vec![] };
|
|
let reward = EraRewardPoints::<AccountId> {
|
|
total: 1,
|
|
individual: vec![(11, 1)].into_iter().collect(),
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Check reward
|
|
ErasRewardPoints::<Test>::insert(0, reward);
|
|
ErasStakers::<Test>::insert(0, 11, &exposure);
|
|
ErasStakersClipped::<Test>::insert(0, 11, exposure);
|
|
ErasValidatorReward::<Test>::insert(0, stake);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_validator(Origin::signed(10), 0));
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), stake * 2);
|
|
|
|
// Set staker
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, stake);
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&2, stake);
|
|
|
|
// only slashes out of bonded stake are applied. without this line,
|
|
// it is 0.
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(2), 20000, stake - 1, RewardDestination::default()).unwrap();
|
|
// Override exposure of 11
|
|
ErasStakers::<Test>::insert(0, 11, Exposure {
|
|
total: stake,
|
|
own: 1,
|
|
others: vec![ IndividualExposure { who: 2, value: stake - 1 }]
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Check slashing
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(100)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), stake - 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 1);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_from_authorship_event_handler_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
use pallet_authorship::EventHandler;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(<pallet_authorship::Module<Test>>::author(), 11);
|
|
|
|
<Module<Test>>::note_author(11);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::note_uncle(21, 1);
|
|
// Rewarding the same two times works.
|
|
<Module<Test>>::note_uncle(11, 1);
|
|
|
|
// Not mandatory but must be coherent with rewards
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
// 21 is rewarded as an uncle producer
|
|
// 11 is rewarded as a block producer and uncle referencer and uncle producer
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
ErasRewardPoints::<Test>::get(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index),
|
|
EraRewardPoints {
|
|
individual: vec![(11, 20 + 2 * 2 + 1), (21, 1)].into_iter().collect(),
|
|
total: 26,
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn add_reward_points_fns_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Not mandatory but must be coherent with rewards
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::validators(), vec![21, 11]);
|
|
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![
|
|
(21, 1),
|
|
(11, 1),
|
|
(11, 1),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![
|
|
(21, 1),
|
|
(11, 1),
|
|
(11, 1),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
ErasRewardPoints::<Test>::get(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index),
|
|
EraRewardPoints {
|
|
individual: vec![(11, 4), (21, 2)].into_iter().collect(),
|
|
total: 6,
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn unbonded_balance_is_not_slashable() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// total amount staked is slashable.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 800));
|
|
|
|
// only the active portion.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&11), 200);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn era_is_always_same_length() {
|
|
// This ensures that the sessions is always of the same length if there is no forcing no
|
|
// session changes.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let session_per_era = <SessionsPerEra as Get<SessionIndex>>::get();
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_start_session_index(active_era()).unwrap(), session_per_era);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_start_session_index(active_era()).unwrap(), session_per_era * 2u32);
|
|
|
|
let session = Session::current_index();
|
|
ForceEra::put(Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
advance_session();
|
|
advance_session();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_start_session_index(active_era()).unwrap(), session + 2);
|
|
|
|
start_era(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_start_session_index(active_era()).unwrap(), session + 2u32 + session_per_era);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_forces_new_era() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(5)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_ensures_new_era_without_clobbering() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::force_new_era_always(Origin::ROOT));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceAlways);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(5)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceAlways);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_deselects_validator_even_when_slash_is_zero() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(!Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashing_performed_according_exposure() {
|
|
// This test checks that slashing is performed according the exposure (or more precisely,
|
|
// historical exposure), not the current balance.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11).own, 1000);
|
|
|
|
// Handle an offence with a historical exposure.
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 500,
|
|
own: 500,
|
|
others: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The stash account should be slashed for 250 (50% of 500).
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000 - 250);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slash_in_old_span_does_not_deselect() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(10), Default::default()).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
assert!(!Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// this staker is in a new slashing span now, having re-registered after
|
|
// their prior slash.
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// not forcing for zero-slash and previous span.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
// NOTE: A 100% slash here would clean up the account, causing de-registration.
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(95)],
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// or non-zero.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(11);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reporters_receive_their_slice() {
|
|
// This test verifies that the reporters of the offence receive their slice from the slashed
|
|
// amount.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// The reporters' reward is calculated from the total exposure.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1125;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11).total, initial_balance);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![1, 2],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// F1 * (reward_proportion * slash - 0)
|
|
// 50% * (10% * initial_balance / 2)
|
|
let reward = (initial_balance / 20) / 2;
|
|
let reward_each = reward / 2; // split into two pieces.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1), 10 + reward_each);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(2), 20 + reward_each);
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(11);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn subsequent_reports_in_same_span_pay_out_less() {
|
|
// This test verifies that the reporters of the offence receive their slice from the slashed
|
|
// amount, but less and less if they submit multiple reports in one span.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// The reporters' reward is calculated from the total exposure.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1125;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11).total, initial_balance);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![1],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(20)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// F1 * (reward_proportion * slash - 0)
|
|
// 50% * (10% * initial_balance * 20%)
|
|
let reward = (initial_balance / 5) / 20;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1), 10 + reward);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![1],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let prior_payout = reward;
|
|
|
|
// F1 * (reward_proportion * slash - prior_payout)
|
|
// 50% * (10% * (initial_balance / 2) - prior_payout)
|
|
let reward = ((initial_balance / 20) - prior_payout) / 2;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1), 10 + prior_payout + reward);
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(11);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invulnerables_are_not_slashed() {
|
|
// For invulnerable validators no slashing is performed.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().invulnerables(vec![11]).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21);
|
|
let initial_balance = Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21);
|
|
|
|
let nominator_balances: Vec<_> = exposure.others
|
|
.iter().map(|o| Balances::free_balance(&o.who)).collect();
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50), Perbill::from_percent(20)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator 11 hasn't been slashed, but 21 has been.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// 2000 - (0.2 * initial_balance)
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000 - (2 * initial_balance / 10));
|
|
|
|
// ensure that nominators were slashed as well.
|
|
for (initial_balance, other) in nominator_balances.into_iter().zip(exposure.others) {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(&other.who),
|
|
initial_balance - (2 * other.value / 10),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(11);
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(21);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn dont_slash_if_fraction_is_zero() {
|
|
// Don't slash if the fraction is zero.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator hasn't been slashed. The new era is not forced.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(11);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn only_slash_for_max_in_era() {
|
|
// multiple slashes within one era are only applied if it is more than any previous slash in the
|
|
// same era.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator has been slashed and has been force-chilled.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 500);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator has not been slashed additionally.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 500);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(60)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator got slashed 10% more.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 400);
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(11);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn garbage_collection_after_slashing() {
|
|
// ensures that `SlashingSpans` and `SpanSlash` of an account is removed after reaping.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().existential_deposit(2).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 256_000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 256_000 - 25_600);
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as crate::Store>::SpanSlash::get(&(11, 0)).amount_slashed(), &25_600);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(100)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// validator and nominator slash in era are garbage-collected by era change,
|
|
// so we don't test those here.
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), 0);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::reap_stash(Origin::NONE, 11));
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as crate::Store>::SpanSlash::get(&(11, 0)).amount_slashed(), &0);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn garbage_collection_on_window_pruning() {
|
|
// ensures that `ValidatorSlashInEra` and `NominatorSlashInEra` are cleared after
|
|
// `BondingDuration`.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
let now = Staking::active_era().unwrap().index;
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(now, 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(now, 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - (nominated_value / 10));
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::ValidatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &11).is_some());
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::NominatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &101).is_some());
|
|
|
|
// + 1 because we have to exit the bonding window.
|
|
for era in (0..(BondingDuration::get() + 1)).map(|offset| offset + now + 1) {
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::ValidatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &11).is_some());
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::NominatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &101).is_some());
|
|
|
|
start_era(era);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::ValidatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &11).is_none());
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::NominatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &101).is_none());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashing_nominators_by_span_max() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21);
|
|
let nominated_value_11 = exposure_11.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
let nominated_value_21 = exposure_21.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
|
|
let slash_1_amount = Perbill::from_percent(10) * nominated_value_11;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - slash_1_amount);
|
|
|
|
let expected_spans = vec![
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 1, start: 4, length: None },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 0, start: 0, length: Some(4) },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
let get_span = |account| <Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&account).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
get_span(11).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
expected_spans,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
get_span(101).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
expected_spans,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// second slash: higher era, higher value, same span.
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(30)],
|
|
3,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 11 was not further slashed, but 21 and 101 were.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1700);
|
|
|
|
let slash_2_amount = Perbill::from_percent(30) * nominated_value_21;
|
|
assert!(slash_2_amount > slash_1_amount);
|
|
|
|
// only the maximum slash in a single span is taken.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - slash_2_amount);
|
|
|
|
// third slash: in same era and on same validator as first, higher
|
|
// in-era value, but lower slash value than slash 2.
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(20)],
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 11 was further slashed, but 21 and 101 were not.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 800);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1700);
|
|
|
|
let slash_3_amount = Perbill::from_percent(20) * nominated_value_21;
|
|
assert!(slash_3_amount < slash_2_amount);
|
|
assert!(slash_3_amount > slash_1_amount);
|
|
|
|
// only the maximum slash in a single span is taken.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - slash_2_amount);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashes_are_summed_across_spans() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let get_span = |account| <Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&account).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let expected_spans = vec![
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 1, start: 4, length: None },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 0, start: 0, length: Some(4) },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(get_span(21).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), expected_spans);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1900);
|
|
|
|
// 21 has been force-chilled. re-signal intent to validate.
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(20), Default::default()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
start_era(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21), 900);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let expected_spans = vec![
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 2, start: 5, length: None },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 1, start: 4, length: Some(1) },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 0, start: 0, length: Some(4) },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(get_span(21).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), expected_spans);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1810);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn deferred_slashes_are_deferred() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// at the start of era 4, slashes from era 1 are processed,
|
|
// after being deferred for at least 2 full eras.
|
|
start_era(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - (nominated_value / 10));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn remove_deferred() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(15)],
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// fails if empty
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::ROOT, 1, vec![]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::EmptyTargets
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::ROOT, 1, vec![0]));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// at the start of era 4, slashes from era 1 are processed,
|
|
// after being deferred for at least 2 full eras.
|
|
start_era(4);
|
|
|
|
// the first slash for 10% was cancelled, so no effect.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
start_era(5);
|
|
|
|
let slash_10 = Perbill::from_percent(10);
|
|
let slash_15 = Perbill::from_percent(15);
|
|
let initial_slash = slash_10 * nominated_value;
|
|
|
|
let total_slash = slash_15 * nominated_value;
|
|
let actual_slash = total_slash - initial_slash;
|
|
|
|
// 5% slash (15 - 10) processed now.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 950);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - actual_slash);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn remove_multi_deferred() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (42, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (69, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as Store>::UnappliedSlashes::get(&1).len(), 5);
|
|
|
|
// fails if list is not sorted
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::ROOT, 1, vec![2, 0, 4]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotSortedAndUnique
|
|
);
|
|
// fails if list is not unique
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::ROOT, 1, vec![0, 2, 2]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotSortedAndUnique
|
|
);
|
|
// fails if bad index
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::ROOT, 1, vec![1, 2, 3, 4, 5]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidSlashIndex
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::ROOT, 1, vec![0, 2, 4]));
|
|
|
|
let slashes = <Staking as Store>::UnappliedSlashes::get(&1);
|
|
assert_eq!(slashes.len(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(slashes[0].validator, 21);
|
|
assert_eq!(slashes[1].validator, 42);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mod offchain_phragmen {
|
|
use crate::*;
|
|
use frame_support::{assert_noop, assert_ok};
|
|
use sp_runtime::transaction_validity::TransactionSource;
|
|
use mock::*;
|
|
use parking_lot::RwLock;
|
|
use sp_core::offchain::{
|
|
testing::{PoolState, TestOffchainExt, TestTransactionPoolExt},
|
|
OffchainExt, TransactionPoolExt,
|
|
};
|
|
use sp_io::TestExternalities;
|
|
use sp_phragmen::StakedAssignment;
|
|
use frame_support::traits::OffchainWorker;
|
|
use std::sync::Arc;
|
|
use substrate_test_utils::assert_eq_uvec;
|
|
|
|
fn percent(x: u16) -> OffchainAccuracy {
|
|
OffchainAccuracy::from_percent(x)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// setup a new set of validators and nominator storage items independent of the parent mock
|
|
/// file. This produces a edge graph that can be reduced.
|
|
fn build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext() {
|
|
for i in (10..=40).step_by(10) {
|
|
// Note: we respect the convention of the mock (10, 11 pairs etc.) since these accounts
|
|
// have corresponding keys in session which makes everything more ergonomic and
|
|
// realistic.
|
|
bond_validator(i + 1, i, 100);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let mut voter = 1;
|
|
bond_nominator(voter, 1000 + voter, 100, vec![11]);
|
|
voter = 2;
|
|
bond_nominator(voter, 1000 + voter, 100, vec![11, 11]);
|
|
voter = 3;
|
|
bond_nominator(voter, 1000 + voter, 100, vec![21, 41]);
|
|
voter = 4;
|
|
bond_nominator(voter, 1000 + voter, 100, vec![21, 31, 41]);
|
|
voter = 5;
|
|
bond_nominator(voter, 1000 + voter, 100, vec![21, 31, 41]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn offchainify(ext: &mut TestExternalities) -> Arc<RwLock<PoolState>> {
|
|
let (offchain, _state) = TestOffchainExt::new();
|
|
let (pool, state) = TestTransactionPoolExt::new();
|
|
|
|
ext.register_extension(OffchainExt::new(offchain));
|
|
ext.register_extension(TransactionPoolExt::new(pool));
|
|
|
|
state
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn is_current_session_final_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.session_per_era(3)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), Some(1));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::is_current_session_final(), false);
|
|
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), Some(1));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::is_current_session_final(), true);
|
|
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 5);
|
|
// era changed.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), Some(2));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::is_current_session_final(), false);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offchain_election_flag_is_triggered() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.session_per_era(5)
|
|
.session_length(10)
|
|
.election_lookahead(3)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
run_to_block(7);
|
|
assert_session_era!(0, 0);
|
|
|
|
run_to_block(10);
|
|
assert_session_era!(1, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Closed);
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().is_none());
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_validators().is_none());
|
|
|
|
run_to_block(36);
|
|
assert_session_era!(3, 0);
|
|
|
|
// fist era has session 0, which has 0 blocks length, so we have in total 40 blocks
|
|
// in the era.
|
|
run_to_block(37);
|
|
assert_session_era!(3, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(37));
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().is_some());
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_validators().is_some());
|
|
|
|
run_to_block(38);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(37));
|
|
|
|
run_to_block(39);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(37));
|
|
|
|
run_to_block(40);
|
|
assert_session_era!(4, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Closed);
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().is_none());
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_validators().is_none());
|
|
|
|
run_to_block(86);
|
|
assert_session_era!(8, 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Closed);
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().is_none());
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_validators().is_none());
|
|
|
|
// second era onwards has 50 blocks per era.
|
|
run_to_block(87);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(87));
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().is_some());
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_validators().is_some());
|
|
|
|
run_to_block(90);
|
|
assert_session_era!(9, 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Closed);
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().is_none());
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_validators().is_none());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn election_on_chain_fallback_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Closed);
|
|
// some election must have happened by now.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
System::events()
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.map(|r| r.event)
|
|
.filter_map(|e| {
|
|
if let MetaEvent::staking(inner) = e {
|
|
Some(inner)
|
|
} else {
|
|
None
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.last()
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
RawEvent::StakingElection(ElectionCompute::OnChain),
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
#[ignore] // This takes a few mins
|
|
fn offchain_wont_work_if_snapshot_fails() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.election_lookahead(3)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_validators().is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(12));
|
|
|
|
// validate more than the limit
|
|
let limit: NominatorIndex = ValidatorIndex::max_value() as NominatorIndex + 1;
|
|
let ctrl = 1_000_000;
|
|
for i in 0..limit {
|
|
bond_validator((1000 + i).into(), (1000 + i + ctrl).into(), 100);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// window stays closed since no snapshot was taken.
|
|
run_to_block(27);
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_validators().is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Closed);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn staking_is_locked_when_election_window_open() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.election_lookahead(3)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_validators().is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(12));
|
|
|
|
let call = crate::Call::bond(999, 998, Default::default());
|
|
let outer: mock::Call = call.into();
|
|
|
|
let lock_staking: LockStakingStatus<Test> = Default::default();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
lock_staking.validate(&10, &outer, Default::default(), Default::default(),),
|
|
TransactionValidity::Err(InvalidTransaction::Stale.into()),
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn signed_result_can_be_submitted() {
|
|
// should check that we have a new validator set normally,
|
|
// event says that it comes from offchain.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(12));
|
|
assert!(Staking::snapshot_validators().is_some());
|
|
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
let queued_result = Staking::queued_elected().unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(queued_result.compute, ElectionCompute::Signed);
|
|
|
|
run_to_block(15);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Closed);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
System::events()
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.map(|r| r.event)
|
|
.filter_map(|e| {
|
|
if let MetaEvent::staking(inner) = e {
|
|
Some(inner)
|
|
} else {
|
|
None
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.last()
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
RawEvent::StakingElection(ElectionCompute::Signed),
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn signed_result_can_be_submitted_later() {
|
|
// same as `signed_result_can_be_submitted` but at a later block.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
run_to_block(14);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(12));
|
|
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
let queued_result = Staking::queued_elected().unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(queued_result.compute, ElectionCompute::Signed);
|
|
|
|
run_to_block(15);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Closed);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
System::events()
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.map(|r| r.event)
|
|
.filter_map(|e| {
|
|
if let MetaEvent::staking(inner) = e {
|
|
Some(inner)
|
|
} else {
|
|
None
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.last()
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
RawEvent::StakingElection(ElectionCompute::Signed),
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn early_solution_submission_is_rejected() {
|
|
// should check that we have a new validator set normally,
|
|
// event says that it comes from offchain.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
run_to_block(11);
|
|
// submission is not yet allowed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Closed);
|
|
|
|
// create all the indices just to build the solution.
|
|
Staking::create_stakers_snapshot();
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
Staking::kill_stakers_snapshot();
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenEarlySubmission,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn weak_solution_is_rejected() {
|
|
// A solution which is weaker than what we currently have on-chain is rejected.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
// a good solution
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// a bad solution
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = horrible_phragmen_with_post_processing(false);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenWeakSubmission,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn better_solution_is_accepted() {
|
|
// A solution which is better than what we currently have on-chain is accepted.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
// a meeeeh solution
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = horrible_phragmen_with_post_processing(false);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// a better solution
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offchain_worker_runs_when_window_open() {
|
|
// at the end of the first finalized block with ElectionStatus::open(_), it should execute.
|
|
let mut ext = ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(2)
|
|
.build();
|
|
let state = offchainify(&mut ext);
|
|
ext.execute_with(|| {
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
// local key 11 is in the elected set.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
assert_eq!(state.read().transactions.len(), 0);
|
|
Staking::offchain_worker(12);
|
|
assert_eq!(state.read().transactions.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
let encoded = state.read().transactions[0].clone();
|
|
let extrinsic: Extrinsic = Decode::decode(&mut &*encoded).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let call = extrinsic.call;
|
|
let inner = match call {
|
|
mock::Call::Staking(inner) => inner,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Staking as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
|
|
TransactionSource::Local,
|
|
&inner,
|
|
),
|
|
TransactionValidity::Ok(ValidTransaction {
|
|
priority: 1125, // the proposed slot stake.
|
|
requires: vec![],
|
|
provides: vec![("StakingOffchain", active_era()).encode()],
|
|
longevity: 3,
|
|
propagate: false,
|
|
})
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn mediocre_submission_from_authority_is_early_rejected() {
|
|
let mut ext = ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.build();
|
|
let state = offchainify(&mut ext);
|
|
ext.execute_with(|| {
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
// put a good solution on-chain
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),);
|
|
|
|
// now run the offchain worker in the same chain state.
|
|
Staking::offchain_worker(12);
|
|
assert_eq!(state.read().transactions.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
let encoded = state.read().transactions[0].clone();
|
|
let extrinsic: Extrinsic = Decode::decode(&mut &*encoded).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let call = extrinsic.call;
|
|
let inner = match call {
|
|
mock::Call::Staking(inner) => inner,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// pass this call to ValidateUnsigned
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Staking as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
|
|
TransactionSource::Local,
|
|
&inner,
|
|
),
|
|
TransactionValidity::Err(
|
|
InvalidTransaction::Custom(<Error<Test>>::PhragmenWeakSubmission.as_u8()).into(),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_correct_number_of_winners() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
ValidatorCount::put(3);
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
ValidatorCount::put(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(winners.len(), 3);
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusWinnerCount,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_correct_number_of_winners_1() {
|
|
// if we have too little validators, then the number of candidates is the bound.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(8) // we simply cannot elect 8
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
ValidatorCount::put(3);
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
ValidatorCount::put(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(winners.len(), 3);
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusWinnerCount,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_correct_number_of_winners_2() {
|
|
// if we have too little validators, then the number of candidates is the bound.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(8) // we simply cannot elect 8
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(winners.len(), 4);
|
|
|
|
// all good. We chose 4 and it works.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_out_of_bound_nominator_index() {
|
|
// A nominator index which is simply invalid
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().unwrap().len(), 5 + 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_validators().unwrap().len(), 4);
|
|
let (mut compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
|
|
// index 9 doesn't exist.
|
|
compact.votes1.push((9, 2));
|
|
|
|
// The error type sadly cannot be more specific now.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusCompact,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_out_of_bound_validator_index() {
|
|
// A validator index which is out of bound
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().unwrap().len(), 5 + 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_validators().unwrap().len(), 4);
|
|
let (mut compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
|
|
// index 4 doesn't exist.
|
|
compact.votes1.push((3, 4));
|
|
|
|
// The error type sadly cannot be more specific now.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusCompact,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_out_of_bound_winner_index() {
|
|
// A winner index which is simply invalid
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().unwrap().len(), 5 + 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_validators().unwrap().len(), 4);
|
|
let (compact, _, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
|
|
// index 4 doesn't exist.
|
|
let winners = vec![0, 1, 2, 4];
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusWinner,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_non_winner_validator_index() {
|
|
// An edge that points to a correct validator index who is NOT a winner. This is very
|
|
// similar to the test that raises `PhragmenBogusNomination`.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(2) // we select only 2.
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().unwrap().len(), 5 + 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_validators().unwrap().len(), 4);
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |a| {
|
|
a.iter_mut()
|
|
.find(|x| x.who == 5)
|
|
// all 3 cannot be among the winners. Although, all of them are validator
|
|
// candidates.
|
|
.map(|x| x.distribution = vec![(21, 50), (41, 30), (31, 20)]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusEdge,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_wrong_self_vote() {
|
|
// A self vote for someone else.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |a| {
|
|
// mutate a self vote to target someone else. That someone else is still among the
|
|
// winners
|
|
a.iter_mut().find(|x| x.who == 11).map(|x| {
|
|
x.distribution
|
|
.iter_mut()
|
|
.find(|y| y.0 == 11)
|
|
.map(|y| y.0 = 21)
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusSelfVote,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_wrong_self_vote_2() {
|
|
// A self validator voting for someone else next to self vote.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |a| {
|
|
// Remove the self vote.
|
|
a.retain(|x| x.who != 11);
|
|
// add is as a new double vote
|
|
a.push(StakedAssignment {
|
|
who: 11,
|
|
distribution: vec![(11, 50), (21, 50)],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// This raises score issue.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusSelfVote,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_over_stake() {
|
|
// Someone's edge ratios sums to more than 100%.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
// Note: we don't reduce here to be able to tweak votes3. votes3 will vanish if you
|
|
// reduce.
|
|
let (mut compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(false, |_| {});
|
|
|
|
if let Some(c) = compact.votes3.iter_mut().find(|x| x.0 == 0) {
|
|
// by default it should have been (0, [(2, 33%), (1, 33%)], 0)
|
|
// now the sum is above 100%
|
|
c.1 = [(2, percent(66)), (1, percent(66))];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusCompact,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_under_stake() {
|
|
// at the time of this writing, we cannot under stake someone. The compact assignment works
|
|
// in a way that some of the stakes are presented by the submitter, and the last one is read
|
|
// from chain by subtracting the rest from total. Hence, the sum is always correct.
|
|
// This test is only here as a demonstration.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_invalid_target_stealing() {
|
|
// A valid voter who voted for someone who is a candidate, and is a correct winner, but is
|
|
// actually NOT nominated by this nominator.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(false, |a| {
|
|
// 3 only voted for 20 and 40. We add a fake vote to 30. The stake sum is still
|
|
// correctly 100.
|
|
a.iter_mut()
|
|
.find(|x| x.who == 3)
|
|
.map(|x| x.distribution = vec![(21, 50), (41, 30), (31, 20)]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusNomination,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn nomination_slash_filter_is_checked() {
|
|
// If a nominator has voted for someone who has been recently slashed, that particular
|
|
// nomination should be disabled for the upcoming election. A solution must respect this
|
|
// rule.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
|
|
// finalize the round with fallback. This is needed since all nominator submission
|
|
// are in era zero and we want this one to pass with no problems.
|
|
run_to_block(15);
|
|
|
|
// go to the next session to trigger start_era and bump the active era
|
|
run_to_block(20);
|
|
|
|
// slash 10. This must happen outside of the election window.
|
|
let offender_expo = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, offender_expo.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// validate 10 again for the next round. But this guy will not have the votes that
|
|
// it should have had from 1 and 2.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
Default::default()
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// open the election window and create snapshots.
|
|
run_to_block(32);
|
|
|
|
// a solution that has been prepared after the slash.
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(false, |a| {
|
|
// no one is allowed to vote for 10, except for itself.
|
|
a.into_iter()
|
|
.filter(|s| s.who != 11)
|
|
.for_each(|s|
|
|
assert!(s.distribution.iter().find(|(t, _)| *t == 11).is_none())
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// can be submitted.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// a wrong solution.
|
|
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(false, |a| {
|
|
// add back the vote that has been filtered out.
|
|
a.push(StakedAssignment {
|
|
who: 1,
|
|
distribution: vec![(11, 100)]
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// is rejected.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenSlashedNomination,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invalid_phragmen_result_wrong_score() {
|
|
// A valid voter who's total distributed stake is more than what they bond
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
let (compact, winners, mut score) = prepare_submission_with(true, |_| {});
|
|
score[0] += 1;
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::submit_election_solution(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
winners,
|
|
compact,
|
|
score,
|
|
active_era(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusScore,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offchain_storage_is_set() {
|
|
let mut ext = ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.build();
|
|
let state = offchainify(&mut ext);
|
|
|
|
ext.execute_with(|| {
|
|
use offchain_election::OFFCHAIN_HEAD_DB;
|
|
use sp_runtime::offchain::storage::StorageValueRef;
|
|
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
Staking::offchain_worker(12);
|
|
// it works
|
|
assert_eq!(state.read().transactions.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// and it is set
|
|
let storage = StorageValueRef::persistent(&OFFCHAIN_HEAD_DB);
|
|
assert_eq!(storage.get::<BlockNumber>().unwrap().unwrap(), 12);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offchain_storage_prevents_duplicate() {
|
|
let mut ext = ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.build();
|
|
let _ = offchainify(&mut ext);
|
|
|
|
ext.execute_with(|| {
|
|
use offchain_election::OFFCHAIN_HEAD_DB;
|
|
use sp_runtime::offchain::storage::StorageValueRef;
|
|
let storage = StorageValueRef::persistent(&OFFCHAIN_HEAD_DB);
|
|
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
|
|
// first run -- ok
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
offchain_election::set_check_offchain_execution_status::<Test>(12),
|
|
Ok(()),
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(storage.get::<BlockNumber>().unwrap().unwrap(), 12);
|
|
|
|
// re-execute after the next. not allowed.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
offchain_election::set_check_offchain_execution_status::<Test>(13),
|
|
Err("recently executed."),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// a fork like situation -- re-execute 10, 11, 12. But it won't go through.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
offchain_election::set_check_offchain_execution_status::<Test>(10),
|
|
Err("fork."),
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
offchain_election::set_check_offchain_execution_status::<Test>(11),
|
|
Err("fork."),
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
offchain_election::set_check_offchain_execution_status::<Test>(12),
|
|
Err("recently executed."),
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
#[should_panic]
|
|
fn offence_is_blocked_when_window_open() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.has_stakers(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
run_to_block(12);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(12));
|
|
|
|
let offender_expo = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 10);
|
|
|
|
// panic from the impl in mock
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (10, offender_expo.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slash_kicks_validators_not_nominators_and_disables_nominator_for_kicked_validator() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
// pre-slash balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// 11 and 21 both have the support of 100
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), &11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), &21);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(exposure_11.total, 1000 + 125);
|
|
assert_eq!(exposure_21.total, 1000 + 375);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, exposure_11.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// post-slash balance
|
|
let nominator_slash_amount_11 = 125 / 10;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(101),
|
|
2000 - nominator_slash_amount_11
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// This is the best way to check that the validator was chilled; `get` will
|
|
// return default value.
|
|
for (stash, _) in <Staking as Store>::Validators::iter() {
|
|
assert!(stash != 11);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let nominations = <Staking as Store>::Nominators::get(&101).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// and make sure that the vote will be ignored even if the validator
|
|
// re-registers.
|
|
let last_slash = <Staking as Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11)
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.last_nonzero_slash();
|
|
assert!(nominations.submitted_in < last_slash);
|
|
|
|
// actually re-bond the slashed validator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(10), Default::default()));
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), &11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), &21);
|
|
|
|
// 10 is re-elected, but without the support of 100
|
|
assert_eq!(exposure_11.total, 900);
|
|
|
|
// 20 is re-elected, with the (almost) entire support of 100
|
|
assert_eq!(exposure_21.total, 1000 + 500 - nominator_slash_amount_11);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn claim_reward_at_the_last_era_and_no_double_claim_and_invalid_claim() {
|
|
// should check that:
|
|
// * rewards get paid until history_depth for both validators and nominators
|
|
// * an invalid era to claim doesn't update last_reward
|
|
// * double claim of one era fails
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let init_balance_10 = Balances::total_balance(&10);
|
|
let init_balance_100 = Balances::total_balance(&100);
|
|
|
|
let part_for_10 = Perbill::from_rational_approximation::<u32>(1000, 1125);
|
|
let part_for_100 = Perbill::from_rational_approximation::<u32>(125, 1125);
|
|
|
|
// Check state
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(101, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 10); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// Change total issuance in order to modify total payout
|
|
let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&999, 1_000_000_000);
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 > 10); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 != total_payout_0);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// Change total issuance in order to modify total payout
|
|
let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&999, 1_000_000_000);
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_2 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_2 > 10); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
assert!(total_payout_2 != total_payout_0);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_2 != total_payout_1);
|
|
|
|
start_era(Staking::history_depth() + 1);
|
|
|
|
let active_era = Staking::active_era().unwrap().index;
|
|
|
|
// This is the latest planned era in staking, not the active era
|
|
let current_era = Staking::current_era().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// Last kept is 1:
|
|
assert!(current_era - Staking::history_depth() == 1);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_validator(Origin::signed(10), 0),
|
|
// Fail: Era out of history
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_validator(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_validator(Origin::signed(10), 2));
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_validator(Origin::signed(10), 2),
|
|
// Fail: Double claim
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_validator(Origin::signed(10), active_era),
|
|
// Fail: Era not finished yet
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_nominator(Origin::signed(100), 0, vec![(11, 0)]),
|
|
// Fail: Era out of history
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_nominator(Origin::signed(100), 1, vec![(11, 0)]));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_nominator(Origin::signed(100), 2, vec![(11, 0)]));
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_nominator(Origin::signed(100), 2, vec![(11, 0)]),
|
|
// Fail: Double claim
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_nominator(Origin::signed(100), active_era, vec![(11, 0)]),
|
|
// Fail: Era not finished yet
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Era 0 can't be rewarded anymore and current era can't be rewarded yet
|
|
// only era 1 and 2 can be rewarded.
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + part_for_10 * (total_payout_1 + total_payout_2),
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&100),
|
|
init_balance_100 + part_for_100 * (total_payout_1 + total_payout_2),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn zero_slash_keeps_nominators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// This is the best way to check that the validator was chilled; `get` will
|
|
// return default value.
|
|
for (stash, _) in <Staking as Store>::Validators::iter() {
|
|
assert!(stash != 11);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let nominations = <Staking as Store>::Nominators::get(&101).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// and make sure that the vote will not be ignored, because the slash was
|
|
// zero.
|
|
let last_slash = <Staking as Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).unwrap().last_nonzero_slash();
|
|
assert!(nominations.submitted_in >= last_slash);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn six_session_delay() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
use pallet_session::SessionManager;
|
|
|
|
let val_set = Session::validators();
|
|
let init_session = Session::current_index();
|
|
let init_active_era = Staking::active_era().unwrap().index;
|
|
// pallet-session is delaying session by one, thus the next session to plan is +2.
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 2), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 3), Some(val_set.clone()));
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 4), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 5), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 6), Some(val_set.clone()));
|
|
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, init_active_era);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 1);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, init_active_era);
|
|
|
|
// Reward current era
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// New active era is triggered here.
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 2);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, init_active_era + 1);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 3);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, init_active_era + 1);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 4);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, init_active_era + 1);
|
|
|
|
// Reward current era
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 2)]);
|
|
|
|
// New active era is triggered here.
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 5);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, init_active_era + 2);
|
|
|
|
// That reward are correct
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_reward_points(init_active_era).total, 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_reward_points(init_active_era + 1).total, 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn test_max_nominator_rewarded_per_validator_and_cant_steal_someone_else_reward() {
|
|
// Test:
|
|
// * If nominator nomination is below the $MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator other nominator
|
|
// then the nominator can't claim its reward
|
|
// * A nominator can't claim another nominator reward
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
for i in 0..=<Test as Trait>::MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator::get() {
|
|
let stash = 10_000 + i as u64;
|
|
let controller = 20_000 + i as u64;
|
|
let balance = 10_000 + i as u64;
|
|
Balances::make_free_balance_be(&stash, balance);
|
|
assert_ok!(
|
|
Staking::bond(
|
|
Origin::signed(stash),
|
|
controller,
|
|
balance,
|
|
RewardDestination::Stash
|
|
)
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(controller), vec![11]));
|
|
}
|
|
mock::start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3 * 1000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 100); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
|
|
mock::start_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
// nominator 10_000 can't get its reward because exposure is clipped. However it will try
|
|
// to query other people reward.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_nominator(Origin::signed(20_000), 1, vec![(11, 0)]));
|
|
|
|
// Assert only nominators from 1 to Max are rewarded
|
|
for i in 0..=<Test as Trait>::MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator::get() {
|
|
let stash = 10_000 + i as u64;
|
|
let balance = 10_000 + i as u64;
|
|
if stash == 10_000 {
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(&stash) == balance);
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(&stash) > balance);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn set_history_depth_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(10);
|
|
Staking::set_history_depth(Origin::ROOT, 20).unwrap();
|
|
assert!(<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 4));
|
|
assert!(<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 5));
|
|
Staking::set_history_depth(Origin::ROOT, 4).unwrap();
|
|
assert!(<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 4));
|
|
assert!(!<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 5));
|
|
Staking::set_history_depth(Origin::ROOT, 3).unwrap();
|
|
assert!(!<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 4));
|
|
assert!(!<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 5));
|
|
Staking::set_history_depth(Origin::ROOT, 8).unwrap();
|
|
assert!(!<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 4));
|
|
assert!(!<Staking as Store>::ErasTotalStake::contains_key(10 - 5));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn assert_migration_is_noop() {
|
|
let kusama_active_era = "4a0200000190e2721171010000";
|
|
let era = ActiveEraInfo::decode(&mut &hex::decode(kusama_active_era).unwrap()[..]).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(era.index, 586);
|
|
assert_eq!(era.start, Some(1585135674000));
|
|
}
|