pezkuwi-subxt/bridges/modules/grandpa/src/benchmarking.rs

// Copyright 2019-2021 Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
// This file is part of Parity Bridges Common.

// Parity Bridges Common is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.

// Parity Bridges Common is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
// GNU General Public License for more details.

// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
// along with Parity Bridges Common.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

//! Benchmarks for the GRANDPA Pallet.
//!
//! The main dispatchable for the GRANDPA pallet is `submit_finality_proof`, so these benchmarks are
//! based around that. There are to main factors which affect finality proof verification:
//!
//! 1. The number of `votes-ancestries` in the justification
//! 2. The number of `pre-commits` in the justification
//!
//! Vote ancestries are the headers between (`finality_target`, `head_of_chain`], where
//! `header_of_chain` is a decendant of `finality_target`.
//!
//! Pre-commits are messages which are signed by validators at the head of the chain they think is
//! the best.
//!
//! Consider the following:
//!
//!   / [B'] <- [C']
//! [A] <- [B] <- [C]
//!
//! The common ancestor of both forks is block A, so this is what GRANDPA will finalize. In order to
//! verify this we will have vote ancestries of [B, C, B', C'] and pre-commits [C, C'].
//!
//! Note that the worst case scenario here would be a justification where each validator has it's
//! own fork which is `SESSION_LENGTH` blocks long.
//!
//! As far as benchmarking results go, the only benchmark that should be used in
//! `pallet-bridge-grandpa` to annotate weights is the `submit_finality_proof` one. The others are
//! looking at the effects of specific code paths and do not actually reflect the overall worst case
//! scenario.

use crate::*;

use bp_test_utils::{
	accounts, authority_list, make_justification_for_header, test_keyring, JustificationGeneratorParams, ALICE,
	TEST_GRANDPA_ROUND, TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
};
use frame_benchmarking::{benchmarks_instance_pallet, whitelisted_caller};
use frame_support::traits::Get;
use frame_system::RawOrigin;
use sp_finality_grandpa::AuthorityId;
use sp_runtime::traits::Zero;
use sp_std::{vec, vec::Vec};

// The maximum number of vote ancestries to include in a justification.
//
// In practice this would be limited by the session length (number of blocks a single authority set
// can produce) of a given chain.
const MAX_VOTE_ANCESTRIES: u32 = 1000;

// The maximum number of pre-commits to include in a justification. In practice this scales with the
// number of validators.
const MAX_VALIDATOR_SET_SIZE: u32 = 1024;

/// Returns number of first header to be imported.
///
/// Since we boostrap the pallet with `HeadersToKeep` already imported headers,
/// this function computes the next expected header number to import.
fn header_number<T: Config<I>, I: 'static, N: From<u32>>() -> N {
	(T::HeadersToKeep::get() + 1).into()
}

benchmarks_instance_pallet! {
	// This is the "gold standard" benchmark for this extrinsic, and it's what should be used to
	// annotate the weight in the pallet.
	//
	// The other benchmarks related to `submit_finality_proof` are looking at the effect of specific
	// parameters and are there mostly for seeing how specific codepaths behave.
	submit_finality_proof {
		let v in 1..MAX_VOTE_ANCESTRIES;
		let p in 1..MAX_VALIDATOR_SET_SIZE;

		let caller: T::AccountId = whitelisted_caller();

		let authority_list = accounts(p as u16)
			.iter()
			.map(|id| (AuthorityId::from(*id), 1))
			.collect::<Vec<_>>();

		let init_data = InitializationData {
			header: bp_test_utils::test_header(Zero::zero()),
			authority_list,
			set_id: TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
			is_halted: false,
		};

		bootstrap_bridge::<T, I>(init_data);

		let header: BridgedHeader<T, I> = bp_test_utils::test_header(header_number::<T, I, _>());
		let params = JustificationGeneratorParams {
			header: header.clone(),
			round: TEST_GRANDPA_ROUND,
			set_id: TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
			authorities: accounts(p as u16).iter().map(|k| (*k, 1)).collect::<Vec<_>>(),
			votes: v,
			forks: 1,
		};

		let justification = make_justification_for_header(params);

	}: _(RawOrigin::Signed(caller), header, justification)
	verify {
		let header: BridgedHeader<T, I> = bp_test_utils::test_header(header_number::<T, I, _>());
		let expected_hash = header.hash();

		assert_eq!(<BestFinalized<T, I>>::get(), expected_hash);
		assert!(<ImportedHeaders<T, I>>::contains_key(expected_hash));
	}

	// What we want to check here is the effect of vote ancestries on justification verification
	// do this by varying the number of headers between `finality_target` and `header_of_chain`.
	submit_finality_proof_on_single_fork {
		let v in 1..MAX_VOTE_ANCESTRIES;

		let caller: T::AccountId = whitelisted_caller();

		let init_data = InitializationData {
			header: bp_test_utils::test_header(Zero::zero()),
			authority_list: authority_list(),
			set_id: TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
			is_halted: false,
		};

		bootstrap_bridge::<T, I>(init_data);
		let header: BridgedHeader<T, I> = bp_test_utils::test_header(header_number::<T, I, _>());

		let params = JustificationGeneratorParams {
			header: header.clone(),
			round: TEST_GRANDPA_ROUND,
			set_id: TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
			authorities: test_keyring(),
			votes: v,
			forks: 1,
		};

		let justification = make_justification_for_header(params);

	}: submit_finality_proof(RawOrigin::Signed(caller), header, justification)
	verify {
		let header: BridgedHeader<T, I> = bp_test_utils::test_header(header_number::<T, I, _>());
		let expected_hash = header.hash();

		assert_eq!(<BestFinalized<T, I>>::get(), expected_hash);
		assert!(<ImportedHeaders<T, I>>::contains_key(expected_hash));
	}

	// What we want to check here is the effect of many pre-commits on justification verification.
	// We do this by creating many forks, whose head will be used as a signed pre-commit in the
	// final justification.
	submit_finality_proof_on_many_forks {
		let p in 1..MAX_VALIDATOR_SET_SIZE;

		let caller: T::AccountId = whitelisted_caller();

		let authority_list = accounts(p as u16)
			.iter()
			.map(|id| (AuthorityId::from(*id), 1))
			.collect::<Vec<_>>();

		let init_data = InitializationData {
			header: bp_test_utils::test_header(Zero::zero()),
			authority_list,
			set_id: TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
			is_halted: false,
		};

		bootstrap_bridge::<T, I>(init_data);
		let header: BridgedHeader<T, I> = bp_test_utils::test_header(header_number::<T, I, _>());

		let params = JustificationGeneratorParams {
			header: header.clone(),
			round: TEST_GRANDPA_ROUND,
			set_id: TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
			authorities: accounts(p as u16).iter().map(|k| (*k, 1)).collect::<Vec<_>>(),
			votes: p,
			forks: p,
		};

		let justification = make_justification_for_header(params);

	}: submit_finality_proof(RawOrigin::Signed(caller), header, justification)
	verify {
		let header: BridgedHeader<T, I> = bp_test_utils::test_header(header_number::<T, I, _>());
		let expected_hash = header.hash();

		assert_eq!(<BestFinalized<T, I>>::get(), expected_hash);
		assert!(<ImportedHeaders<T, I>>::contains_key(expected_hash));
	}

	// Here we want to find out the overheaded of looking through consensus digests found in a
	// header. As the number of logs in a header grows, how much more work do we require to look
	// through them?
	//
	// Note that this should be the same for looking through scheduled changes and forces changes,
	// which is why we only have one benchmark for this.
	find_scheduled_change {
		// Not really sure what a good bound for this is.
		let n in 1..1000;

		let mut logs = vec![];
		for i in 0..n {
			// We chose a non-consensus log on purpose since that way we have to look through all
			// the logs in the header
			logs.push(sp_runtime::DigestItem::Other(vec![]));
		}

		let mut header: BridgedHeader<T, I> = bp_test_utils::test_header(Zero::zero());
		let digest = header.digest_mut();
		*digest = sp_runtime::Digest {
			logs,
		};

	}: {
		crate::find_scheduled_change(&header)
	}

	// What we want to check here is how long it takes to read and write the authority set tracked
	// by the pallet as the number of authorities grows.
	read_write_authority_sets {
		// The current max target number of validators on Polkadot/Kusama
		let n in 1..1000;

		let mut authorities = vec![];
		for i in 0..n {
			authorities.push((ALICE, 1));
		}

		let authority_set = bp_header_chain::AuthoritySet {
			authorities: authorities.iter().map(|(id, w)| (AuthorityId::from(*id), *w)).collect(),
			set_id: 0
		};

		<CurrentAuthoritySet<T, I>>::put(&authority_set);

	}: {
		let authority_set = <CurrentAuthoritySet<T, I>>::get();
		<CurrentAuthoritySet<T, I>>::put(&authority_set);
	}
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
	use super::*;
	use frame_support::assert_ok;

	#[test]
	fn finality_proof_is_valid() {
		mock::run_test(|| {
			assert_ok!(test_benchmark_submit_finality_proof::<mock::TestRuntime>());
		});
	}

	#[test]
	fn single_fork_finality_proof_is_valid() {
		mock::run_test(|| {
			assert_ok!(test_benchmark_submit_finality_proof_on_single_fork::<mock::TestRuntime>());
		});
	}

	#[test]
	fn multi_fork_finality_proof_is_valid() {
		mock::run_test(|| {
			assert_ok!(test_benchmark_submit_finality_proof_on_many_forks::<mock::TestRuntime>());
		});
	}
}