mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-04-28 21:27:57 +00:00
2c77f8f4ca
* Use sensible maths for from_rational * Fixes * Fixes * More fixes * Remove debugging * Add fuzzer tests Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> * Prevent panics Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> * docs Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> * Clean up old code Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> * Test all rounding modes of from_rational Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> * Clean up code Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> * Revert "Prevent panics" This reverts commit 7e88ac76138a1b590e68b68318505b69efe1e1f6. * fix imports Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> * cleanup Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> * Fuzz test multiply_rational Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> * Fix import Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> * fmt Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> * Return None in multiply_rational on zero div Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
5828 lines
175 KiB
Rust
5828 lines
175 KiB
Rust
// This file is part of Substrate.
|
|
|
|
// Copyright (C) Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
|
|
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
//
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
//
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
//! Tests for the module.
|
|
|
|
use super::{ConfigOp, Event, *};
|
|
use frame_election_provider_support::{ElectionProvider, SortedListProvider, Support};
|
|
use frame_support::{
|
|
assert_noop, assert_ok, assert_storage_noop, bounded_vec,
|
|
dispatch::{extract_actual_weight, GetDispatchInfo, WithPostDispatchInfo},
|
|
pallet_prelude::*,
|
|
traits::{Currency, Get, ReservableCurrency},
|
|
};
|
|
use mock::*;
|
|
use pallet_balances::Error as BalancesError;
|
|
use sp_runtime::{
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate,
|
|
traits::{BadOrigin, Dispatchable},
|
|
Perbill, Percent, Rounding, TokenError,
|
|
};
|
|
use sp_staking::{
|
|
offence::{DisableStrategy, OffenceDetails, OnOffenceHandler},
|
|
SessionIndex,
|
|
};
|
|
use sp_std::prelude::*;
|
|
use substrate_test_utils::assert_eq_uvec;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn set_staking_configs_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// setting works
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_configs(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::root(),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(1_500),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(2_000),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(10),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(20),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(Percent::from_percent(75)),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(Zero::zero())
|
|
));
|
|
assert_eq!(MinNominatorBond::<Test>::get(), 1_500);
|
|
assert_eq!(MinValidatorBond::<Test>::get(), 2_000);
|
|
assert_eq!(MaxNominatorsCount::<Test>::get(), Some(10));
|
|
assert_eq!(MaxValidatorsCount::<Test>::get(), Some(20));
|
|
assert_eq!(ChillThreshold::<Test>::get(), Some(Percent::from_percent(75)));
|
|
assert_eq!(MinCommission::<Test>::get(), Perbill::from_percent(0));
|
|
|
|
// noop does nothing
|
|
assert_storage_noop!(assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_configs(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::root(),
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop
|
|
)));
|
|
|
|
// removing works
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_configs(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::root(),
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove
|
|
));
|
|
assert_eq!(MinNominatorBond::<Test>::get(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(MinValidatorBond::<Test>::get(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(MaxNominatorsCount::<Test>::get(), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(MaxValidatorsCount::<Test>::get(), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(ChillThreshold::<Test>::get(), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(MinCommission::<Test>::get(), Perbill::from_percent(0));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn force_unstake_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Account 11 is stashed and locked, and account 10 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Adds 2 slashing spans
|
|
add_slash(&11);
|
|
// Cant transfer
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::transfer_allow_death(RuntimeOrigin::signed(11), 1, 10),
|
|
TokenError::Frozen,
|
|
);
|
|
// Force unstake requires root.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::force_unstake(RuntimeOrigin::signed(11), 11, 2), BadOrigin);
|
|
// Force unstake needs correct number of slashing spans (for weight calculation)
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::force_unstake(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 11, 0),
|
|
Error::<Test>::IncorrectSlashingSpans
|
|
);
|
|
// We now force them to unstake
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::force_unstake(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 11, 2));
|
|
// No longer bonded.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), None);
|
|
// Transfer works.
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer_allow_death(RuntimeOrigin::signed(11), 1, 10));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn kill_stash_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Account 11 is stashed and locked, and account 10 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Adds 2 slashing spans
|
|
add_slash(&11);
|
|
// Only can kill a stash account
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::kill_stash(&12, 0), Error::<Test>::NotStash);
|
|
// Respects slashing span count
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::kill_stash(&11, 0), Error::<Test>::IncorrectSlashingSpans);
|
|
// Correct inputs, everything works
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::kill_stash(&11, 2));
|
|
// No longer bonded.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), None);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn basic_setup_works() {
|
|
// Verifies initial conditions of mock
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Account 11 is stashed and locked, and account 10 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Account 21 is stashed and locked, and account 20 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&21), Some(20));
|
|
// Account 1 is not a stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&1), None);
|
|
|
|
// Account 10 controls the stash from account 11, which is 100 * balance_factor units
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
// Account 20 controls the stash from account 21, which is 200 * balance_factor units
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// Account 1 does not control any stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&1), None);
|
|
|
|
// ValidatorPrefs are default
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![
|
|
(31, ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
(21, ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
(11, ValidatorPrefs::default())
|
|
]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(100),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 101,
|
|
total: 500,
|
|
active: 500,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11),
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 1125,
|
|
own: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![IndividualExposure { who: 101, value: 125 }]
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21),
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 1375,
|
|
own: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![IndividualExposure { who: 101, value: 375 }]
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// initial total stake = 1125 + 1375
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_total_stake(active_era()), 2500);
|
|
|
|
// The number of validators required.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Initial Era and session
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Account 10 has `balance_factor` free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// New era is not being forced
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn change_controller_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// 10 and 11 are bonded as stash controller.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// 10 can control 11 who is initially a validator.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10)));
|
|
|
|
// change controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_controller(RuntimeOrigin::signed(11), 5));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(5));
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// 10 is no longer in control.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotController,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(5), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rewards_should_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).session_per_era(3).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let init_balance_10 = Balances::total_balance(&10);
|
|
let init_balance_11 = Balances::total_balance(&11);
|
|
let init_balance_20 = Balances::total_balance(&20);
|
|
let init_balance_21 = Balances::total_balance(&21);
|
|
let init_balance_100 = Balances::total_balance(&100);
|
|
let init_balance_101 = Balances::total_balance(&101);
|
|
|
|
// Set payees
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(21, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(101, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 50)]);
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 50)]);
|
|
// This is the second validator of the current elected set.
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 50)]);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration of the session.
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
let maximum_payout = maximum_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), init_balance_10);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), init_balance_11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&20), init_balance_20);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&21), init_balance_21);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&100), init_balance_100);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&101), init_balance_101);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_reward_points(active_era()),
|
|
EraRewardPoints {
|
|
total: 50 * 3,
|
|
individual: vec![(11, 100), (21, 50)].into_iter().collect(),
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
let part_for_10 = Perbill::from_rational::<u32>(1000, 1125);
|
|
let part_for_20 = Perbill::from_rational::<u32>(1000, 1375);
|
|
let part_for_100_from_10 = Perbill::from_rational::<u32>(125, 1125);
|
|
let part_for_100_from_20 = Perbill::from_rational::<u32>(375, 1375);
|
|
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(mock::RewardRemainderUnbalanced::get(), maximum_payout - total_payout_0,);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
*mock::staking_events().last().unwrap(),
|
|
Event::EraPaid {
|
|
era_index: 0,
|
|
validator_payout: total_payout_0,
|
|
remainder: maximum_payout - total_payout_0
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + part_for_10 * total_payout_0 * 2 / 3,
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&11), init_balance_11, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&20),
|
|
init_balance_20 + part_for_20 * total_payout_0 * 1 / 3,
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&21), init_balance_21, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&100),
|
|
init_balance_100 +
|
|
part_for_100_from_10 * total_payout_0 * 2 / 3 +
|
|
part_for_100_from_20 * total_payout_0 * 1 / 3,
|
|
2
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&101), init_balance_101, 2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
mock::RewardRemainderUnbalanced::get(),
|
|
maximum_payout * 2 - total_payout_0 - total_payout_1,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
*mock::staking_events().last().unwrap(),
|
|
Event::EraPaid {
|
|
era_index: 1,
|
|
validator_payout: total_payout_1,
|
|
remainder: maximum_payout - total_payout_1
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + part_for_10 * (total_payout_0 * 2 / 3 + total_payout_1),
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&11), init_balance_11, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&20),
|
|
init_balance_20 + part_for_20 * total_payout_0 * 1 / 3,
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&21), init_balance_21, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&100),
|
|
init_balance_100 +
|
|
part_for_100_from_10 * (total_payout_0 * 2 / 3 + total_payout_1) +
|
|
part_for_100_from_20 * total_payout_0 * 1 / 3,
|
|
2
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&101), init_balance_101, 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn staking_should_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// remember + compare this along with the test.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..5 {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&i, 2000);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 2:
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
// add a new candidate for being a validator. account 3 controlled by 4.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(3), 4, 1500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Session::set_keys(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(4),
|
|
SessionKeys { other: 4.into() },
|
|
vec![]
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// No effects will be seen so far.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 3:
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
|
|
// No effects will be seen so far. Era has not been yet triggered.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 4: the validators will now be queued.
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 5: the validators are still in queue.
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 6: the validators will now be changed.
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 4]);
|
|
// --- Block 6: Unstake 4 as a validator, freeing up the balance stashed in 3
|
|
// 4 will chill
|
|
Staking::chill(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 7: nothing. 4 is still there.
|
|
start_session(7);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 4]);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 8:
|
|
start_session(8);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 9: 4 will not be a validator.
|
|
start_session(9);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// Note: the stashed value of 4 is still lock
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&4),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 3,
|
|
total: 1500,
|
|
active: 1500,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![0],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// e.g. it cannot reserve more than 500 that it has free from the total 2000
|
|
assert_noop!(Balances::reserve(&3, 501), BalancesError::<Test, _>::LiquidityRestrictions);
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&3, 409));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn blocking_and_kicking_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.nominate(true)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// block validator 10/11
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(10),
|
|
ValidatorPrefs { blocked: true, ..Default::default() }
|
|
));
|
|
// attempt to nominate from 100/101...
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(100), vec![11]));
|
|
// should have worked since we're already nominated them
|
|
assert_eq!(Nominators::<Test>::get(&101).unwrap().targets, vec![11]);
|
|
// kick the nominator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::kick(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), vec![101]));
|
|
// should have been kicked now
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::get(&101).unwrap().targets.is_empty());
|
|
// attempt to nominate from 100/101...
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(100), vec![11]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::BadTarget
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn less_than_needed_candidates_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::minimum_validator_count(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![30, 20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Previous set is selected. NO election algorithm is even executed.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![30, 20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// But the exposure is updated in a simple way. No external votes exists.
|
|
// This is purely self-vote.
|
|
assert!(ErasStakers::<Test>::iter_prefix_values(active_era())
|
|
.all(|exposure| exposure.others.is_empty()));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn no_candidate_emergency_condition() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(15)
|
|
.set_status(41, StakerStatus::Validator)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// initial validators
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![10, 20, 30, 40]);
|
|
let prefs = ValidatorPrefs { commission: Perbill::one(), ..Default::default() };
|
|
Validators::<Test>::insert(11, prefs.clone());
|
|
|
|
// set the minimum validator count.
|
|
MinimumValidatorCount::<Test>::put(10);
|
|
|
|
// try to chill
|
|
let res = Staking::chill(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10));
|
|
assert_ok!(res);
|
|
|
|
let current_era = CurrentEra::<Test>::get();
|
|
|
|
// try trigger new era
|
|
mock::run_to_block(20);
|
|
assert_eq!(*staking_events().last().unwrap(), Event::StakingElectionFailed);
|
|
// No new era is created
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era, CurrentEra::<Test>::get());
|
|
|
|
// Go to far further session to see if validator have changed
|
|
mock::run_to_block(100);
|
|
|
|
// Previous ones are elected. chill is not effective in active era (as era hasn't
|
|
// changed)
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![10, 20, 30, 40]);
|
|
// The chill is still pending.
|
|
assert!(!Validators::<Test>::contains_key(11));
|
|
// No new era is created.
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era, CurrentEra::<Test>::get());
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn nominating_and_rewards_should_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.set_status(41, StakerStatus::Validator)
|
|
.set_status(11, StakerStatus::Idle)
|
|
.set_status(31, StakerStatus::Idle)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// initial validators.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![40, 20]);
|
|
|
|
// re-validate with 11 and 31.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), Default::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(30), Default::default()));
|
|
|
|
// Set payee to controller.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(10),
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(20),
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(30),
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(40),
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// give the man some money
|
|
let initial_balance = 1000;
|
|
for i in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 20, 21].iter() {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(i, initial_balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// bond two account pairs and state interest in nomination.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1),
|
|
2,
|
|
1000,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(2), vec![11, 21, 31]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(3),
|
|
4,
|
|
1000,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), vec![11, 21, 41]));
|
|
|
|
// the total reward for era 0
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(41, 1)]);
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// 10 and 20 have more votes, they will be chosen.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// old validators must have already received some rewards.
|
|
let initial_balance_40 = Balances::total_balance(&40);
|
|
let mut initial_balance_20 = Balances::total_balance(&20);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&40), initial_balance_40 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&20), initial_balance_20 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
initial_balance_20 = Balances::total_balance(&20);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(ErasStakers::<Test>::iter_prefix_values(active_era()).count(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11),
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 1000 + 800,
|
|
own: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 1, value: 400 },
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 3, value: 400 },
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21),
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 1000 + 1200,
|
|
own: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 1, value: 600 },
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 3, value: 600 },
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// the total reward for era 1
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 2)]);
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// nothing else will happen, era ends and rewards are paid again, it is expected that
|
|
// nominators will also be paid. See below
|
|
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
let payout_for_10 = total_payout_1 / 3;
|
|
let payout_for_20 = 2 * total_payout_1 / 3;
|
|
// Nominator 2: has [400/1800 ~ 2/9 from 10] + [600/2200 ~ 3/11 from 20]'s reward. ==>
|
|
// 2/9 + 3/11
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&2),
|
|
initial_balance + (2 * payout_for_10 / 9 + 3 * payout_for_20 / 11),
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
// Nominator 4: has [400/1800 ~ 2/9 from 10] + [600/2200 ~ 3/11 from 20]'s reward. ==>
|
|
// 2/9 + 3/11
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&4),
|
|
initial_balance + (2 * payout_for_10 / 9 + 3 * payout_for_20 / 11),
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Validator 10: got 800 / 1800 external stake => 8/18 =? 4/9 => Validator's share = 5/9
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&10),
|
|
initial_balance + 5 * payout_for_10 / 9,
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
// Validator 20: got 1200 / 2200 external stake => 12/22 =? 6/11 => Validator's share =
|
|
// 5/11
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&20),
|
|
initial_balance_20 + 5 * payout_for_20 / 11,
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn nominators_also_get_slashed_pro_rata() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
let slash_percent = Perbill::from_percent(5);
|
|
let initial_exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
// 101 is a nominator for 11
|
|
assert_eq!(initial_exposure.others.first().unwrap().who, 101);
|
|
|
|
// staked values;
|
|
let nominator_stake = Staking::ledger(100).unwrap().active;
|
|
let nominator_balance = balances(&101).0;
|
|
let validator_stake = Staking::ledger(10).unwrap().active;
|
|
let validator_balance = balances(&11).0;
|
|
let exposed_stake = initial_exposure.total;
|
|
let exposed_validator = initial_exposure.own;
|
|
let exposed_nominator = initial_exposure.others.first().unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
// 11 goes offline
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, initial_exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[slash_percent],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// both stakes must have been decreased.
|
|
assert!(Staking::ledger(100).unwrap().active < nominator_stake);
|
|
assert!(Staking::ledger(10).unwrap().active < validator_stake);
|
|
|
|
let slash_amount = slash_percent * exposed_stake;
|
|
let validator_share =
|
|
Perbill::from_rational(exposed_validator, exposed_stake) * slash_amount;
|
|
let nominator_share =
|
|
Perbill::from_rational(exposed_nominator, exposed_stake) * slash_amount;
|
|
|
|
// both slash amounts need to be positive for the test to make sense.
|
|
assert!(validator_share > 0);
|
|
assert!(nominator_share > 0);
|
|
|
|
// both stakes must have been decreased pro-rata.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(100).unwrap().active, nominator_stake - nominator_share);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(10).unwrap().active, validator_stake - validator_share);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
balances(&101).0, // free balance
|
|
nominator_balance - nominator_share,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
balances(&11).0, // free balance
|
|
validator_balance - validator_share,
|
|
);
|
|
// Because slashing happened.
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(10));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn double_staking_should_fail() {
|
|
// should test (in the same order):
|
|
// * an account already bonded as stash cannot be be stashed again.
|
|
// * an account already bonded as stash cannot nominate.
|
|
// * an account already bonded as controller can nominate.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let arbitrary_value = 5;
|
|
// 2 = controller, 1 stashed => ok
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1),
|
|
2,
|
|
arbitrary_value,
|
|
RewardDestination::default()
|
|
));
|
|
// 4 = not used so far, 1 stashed => not allowed.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1),
|
|
4,
|
|
arbitrary_value,
|
|
RewardDestination::default()
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyBonded,
|
|
);
|
|
// 1 = stashed => attempting to nominate should fail.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1), vec![1]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotController
|
|
);
|
|
// 2 = controller => nominating should work.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(2), vec![1]));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn double_controlling_should_fail() {
|
|
// should test (in the same order):
|
|
// * an account already bonded as controller CANNOT be reused as the controller of another
|
|
// account.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let arbitrary_value = 5;
|
|
// 2 = controller, 1 stashed => ok
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1),
|
|
2,
|
|
arbitrary_value,
|
|
RewardDestination::default(),
|
|
));
|
|
// 2 = controller, 3 stashed (Note that 2 is reused.) => no-op
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(3),
|
|
2,
|
|
arbitrary_value,
|
|
RewardDestination::default()
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyPaired,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn session_and_eras_work_simple() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().period(1).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Session 1: this is basically a noop. This has already been started.
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Session 2: No change.
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Session 3: Era increment.
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 3);
|
|
|
|
// Session 4: No change.
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 4);
|
|
|
|
// Session 5: No change.
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 5);
|
|
|
|
// Session 6: Era increment.
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 6);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn session_and_eras_work_complex() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().period(5).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 1);
|
|
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 5);
|
|
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 10);
|
|
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 15);
|
|
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 20);
|
|
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 25);
|
|
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 30);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn forcing_new_era_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// normal flow of session.
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// no era change.
|
|
Staking::set_force_era(Forcing::ForceNone);
|
|
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
start_session(7);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// back to normal.
|
|
// this immediately starts a new session.
|
|
Staking::set_force_era(Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
|
|
start_session(8);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
start_session(9);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
// forceful change
|
|
Staking::set_force_era(Forcing::ForceAlways);
|
|
|
|
start_session(10);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
start_session(11);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 3);
|
|
|
|
start_session(12);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 4);
|
|
|
|
// just one forceful change
|
|
Staking::set_force_era(Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
start_session(13);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(ForceEra::<Test>::get(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
|
|
start_session(14);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 6);
|
|
|
|
start_session(15);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 6);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_transfer_staked_balance() {
|
|
// Tests that a stash account cannot transfer funds
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 11 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Confirm account 11 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 (via controller 10) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).total, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 cannot transfer as a result
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::transfer_allow_death(RuntimeOrigin::signed(11), 20, 1),
|
|
TokenError::Frozen,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 extra free balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 10000);
|
|
// Confirm that account 11 can now transfer some balance
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer_allow_death(RuntimeOrigin::signed(11), 20, 1));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_transfer_staked_balance_2() {
|
|
// Tests that a stash account cannot transfer funds
|
|
// Same test as above but with 20, and more accurate.
|
|
// 21 has 2000 free balance but 1000 at stake
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 21 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&21), Some(20));
|
|
// Confirm account 21 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
// Confirm account 21 (via controller 20) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21).total, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 21 can transfer at most 1000
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::transfer_allow_death(RuntimeOrigin::signed(21), 20, 1001),
|
|
TokenError::Frozen,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer_allow_death(RuntimeOrigin::signed(21), 20, 1000));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_reserve_staked_balance() {
|
|
// Checks that a bonded account cannot reserve balance from free balance
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 11 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Confirm account 11 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 (via controller 10) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).own, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 cannot reserve as a result
|
|
assert_noop!(Balances::reserve(&11, 1), BalancesError::<Test, _>::LiquidityRestrictions);
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 extra free balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 10000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 can now reserve balance
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&11, 1));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_destination_works() {
|
|
// Rewards go to the correct destination as determined in Payee
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Check that account 11 is a validator
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
// Check the balance of the validator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// Check how much is at stake
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Staked (default)
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Staked);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the stash account of validator
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000 + total_payout_0);
|
|
// Check that amount at stake increased accordingly
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
active: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![0],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Change RewardDestination to Stash
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000 + total_payout_0 + total_payout_1);
|
|
// Record this value
|
|
let recorded_stash_balance = 1000 + total_payout_0 + total_payout_1;
|
|
// Check that amount at stake is NOT increased
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
active: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![0, 1],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Change RewardDestination to Controller
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
// Check controller balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_2 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(2);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the controller account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1 + total_payout_2);
|
|
// Check that amount at stake is NOT increased
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
active: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![0, 1, 2],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// Check that amount in staked account is NOT increased.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), recorded_stash_balance);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn validator_payment_prefs_work() {
|
|
// Test that validator preferences are correctly honored
|
|
// Note: unstake threshold is being directly tested in slashing tests.
|
|
// This test will focus on validator payment.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let commission = Perbill::from_percent(40);
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::insert(&11, ValidatorPrefs { commission, ..Default::default() });
|
|
|
|
// Reward controller so staked ratio doesn't change.
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&101, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
let balance_era_1_10 = Balances::total_balance(&10);
|
|
let balance_era_1_100 = Balances::total_balance(&100);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
let exposure_1 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
let taken_cut = commission * total_payout_1;
|
|
let shared_cut = total_payout_1 - taken_cut;
|
|
let reward_of_10 = shared_cut * exposure_1.own / exposure_1.total + taken_cut;
|
|
let reward_of_100 = shared_cut * exposure_1.others[0].value / exposure_1.total;
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&10), balance_era_1_10 + reward_of_10, 2);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&100), balance_era_1_100 + reward_of_100, 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_extra_works() {
|
|
// Tests that extra `free_balance` in the stash can be added to stake
|
|
// NOTE: this tests only verifies `StakingLedger` for correct updates
|
|
// See `bond_extra_and_withdraw_unbonded_works` for more details and updates on `Exposure`.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Check that account 10 is a validator
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
// Check that account 10 is bonded to account 11
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Check how much is at stake
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// Call the bond_extra function from controller, add only 100
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(RuntimeOrigin::signed(11), 100));
|
|
// There should be 100 more `total` and `active` in the ledger
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Call the bond_extra function with a large number, should handle it
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(RuntimeOrigin::signed(11), Balance::max_value()));
|
|
// The full amount of the funds should now be in the total and active
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000000,
|
|
active: 1000000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_extra_and_withdraw_unbonded_works() {
|
|
//
|
|
// * Should test
|
|
// * Given an account being bonded [and chosen as a validator](not mandatory)
|
|
// * It can add extra funds to the bonded account.
|
|
// * it can unbond a portion of its funds from the stash account.
|
|
// * Once the unbonding period is done, it can actually take the funds out of the stash.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// Initial config should be correct
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// check the balance of a validator accounts.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11),
|
|
Exposure { total: 1000, own: 1000, others: vec![] }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// deposit the extra 100 units
|
|
Staking::bond_extra(RuntimeOrigin::signed(11), 100).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// Exposure is a snapshot! only updated after the next era update.
|
|
assert_ne!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11),
|
|
Exposure { total: 1000 + 100, own: 1000 + 100, others: vec![] }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// ledger should be the same.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// Exposure is now updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11),
|
|
Exposure { total: 1000 + 100, own: 1000 + 100, others: vec![] }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 1000).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 1000, era: 2 + 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Attempting to free the balances now will fail. 2 eras need to pass.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 0));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 1000, era: 2 + 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// nothing yet
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 0));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 1000, era: 2 + 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(5);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 0));
|
|
// Now the value is free and the staking ledger is updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 100,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn many_unbond_calls_should_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let mut current_era = 0;
|
|
// locked at era MaxUnlockingChunks - 1 until 3
|
|
|
|
let max_unlocking_chunks = <<Test as Config>::MaxUnlockingChunks as Get<u32>>::get();
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..max_unlocking_chunks - 1 {
|
|
// There is only 1 chunk per era, so we need to be in a new era to create a chunk.
|
|
current_era = i as u32;
|
|
mock::start_active_era(current_era);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
current_era += 1;
|
|
mock::start_active_era(current_era);
|
|
|
|
// This chunk is locked at `current_era` through `current_era + 2` (because
|
|
// `BondingDuration` == 3).
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10).map(|l| l.unlocking.len()).unwrap(),
|
|
<<Test as Config>::MaxUnlockingChunks as Get<u32>>::get() as usize
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// even though the number of unlocked chunks is the same as `MaxUnlockingChunks`,
|
|
// unbonding works as expected.
|
|
for i in current_era..(current_era + max_unlocking_chunks) - 1 {
|
|
// There is only 1 chunk per era, so we need to be in a new era to create a chunk.
|
|
current_era = i as u32;
|
|
mock::start_active_era(current_era);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// only slots within last `BondingDuration` are filled.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10).map(|l| l.unlocking.len()).unwrap(),
|
|
<<Test as Config>::BondingDuration>::get() as usize
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn auto_withdraw_may_not_unlock_all_chunks() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// set `MaxUnlockingChunks` to a low number to test case when the unbonding period
|
|
// is larger than the number of unlocking chunks available, which may result on a
|
|
// `Error::NoMoreChunks`, even when the auto-withdraw tries to release locked chunks.
|
|
MaxUnlockingChunks::set(1);
|
|
|
|
let mut current_era = 0;
|
|
|
|
// fills the chunking slots for account
|
|
mock::start_active_era(current_era);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
|
|
current_era += 1;
|
|
mock::start_active_era(current_era);
|
|
|
|
// unbonding will fail because i) there are no remaining chunks and ii) no filled chunks
|
|
// can be released because current chunk hasn't stay in the queue for at least
|
|
// `BondingDuration`
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 1), Error::<Test>::NoMoreChunks);
|
|
|
|
// fast-forward a few eras for unbond to be successful with implicit withdraw
|
|
current_era += 10;
|
|
mock::start_active_era(current_era);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rebond_works() {
|
|
//
|
|
// * Should test
|
|
// * Given an account being bonded [and chosen as a validator](not mandatory)
|
|
// * it can unbond a portion of its funds from the stash account.
|
|
// * it can re-bond a portion of the funds scheduled to unlock.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Try to rebond some funds. We get an error since no fund is unbonded.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::rebond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 500), Error::<Test>::NoUnlockChunk);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 900, era: 2 + 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond all the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 900, era: 5 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond part of the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 500).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 600,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 5 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond the remainder of the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 500).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond parts of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 900, era: 5 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond part of the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 500).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 600,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 5 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rebond_is_fifo() {
|
|
// Rebond should proceed by reversing the most recent bond operations.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond some of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 400).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 600,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond more of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 300,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 3 + 3 },
|
|
],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond yet more of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 200).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 3 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 200, era: 4 + 3 },
|
|
],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond half of the unbonding funds.
|
|
Staking::rebond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 400).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 500,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 100, era: 3 + 3 },
|
|
],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rebond_emits_right_value_in_event() {
|
|
// When a user calls rebond with more than can be rebonded, things succeed,
|
|
// and the rebond event emits the actual value rebonded.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 900, era: 1 + 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond less than the total
|
|
Staking::rebond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 100).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 200,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 800, era: 1 + 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// Event emitted should be correct
|
|
assert_eq!(*staking_events().last().unwrap(), Event::Bonded { stash: 11, amount: 100 });
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond way more than available
|
|
Staking::rebond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 100_000).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
// Event emitted should be correct, only 800
|
|
assert_eq!(*staking_events().last().unwrap(), Event::Bonded { stash: 11, amount: 800 });
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_to_stake_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.set_status(31, StakerStatus::Idle)
|
|
.set_status(41, StakerStatus::Idle)
|
|
.set_stake(21, 2000)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
// Confirm account 10 and 20 are validators
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11) && <Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&21));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).total, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21).total, 2000);
|
|
|
|
// Give the man some money.
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&10, 1000);
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&20, 1000);
|
|
|
|
// Bypass logic and change current exposure
|
|
ErasStakers::<Test>::insert(0, 21, Exposure { total: 69, own: 69, others: vec![] });
|
|
<Ledger<Test>>::insert(
|
|
&20,
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 69,
|
|
active: 69,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// New era --> rewards are paid --> stakes are changed
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).total, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21).total, 69);
|
|
|
|
let _11_balance = Balances::free_balance(&11);
|
|
assert_eq!(_11_balance, 1000 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
|
|
// Trigger another new era as the info are frozen before the era start.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// -- new infos
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).total, 1000 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21).total, 69 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reap_stash_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(10)
|
|
.balance_factor(10)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// given
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 10);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 10 * 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
|
|
// stash is not reapable
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::reap_stash(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20), 11, 0),
|
|
Error::<Test>::FundedTarget
|
|
);
|
|
// controller or any other account is not reapable
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::reap_stash(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20), 10, 0),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotStash
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// no easy way to cause an account to go below ED, we tweak their staking ledger
|
|
// instead.
|
|
Ledger::<Test>::insert(
|
|
10,
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 5,
|
|
active: 5,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// reap-able
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::reap_stash(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20), 11, 0));
|
|
|
|
// then
|
|
assert!(!<Ledger<Test>>::contains_key(&10));
|
|
assert!(!<Bonded<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Payee<Test>>::contains_key(&11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn switching_roles() {
|
|
// Test that it should be possible to switch between roles (nominator, validator, idle) with
|
|
// minimal overhead.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Reset reward destination
|
|
for i in &[10, 20] {
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(*i),
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..7 {
|
|
let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&i, 5000);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// add 2 nominators
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1), 2, 2000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(2), vec![11, 5]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(3), 4, 500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), vec![21, 1]));
|
|
|
|
// add a new validator candidate
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(5), 6, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(6), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Session::set_keys(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(6),
|
|
SessionKeys { other: 6.into() },
|
|
vec![]
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// with current nominators 10 and 5 have the most stake
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![6, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// 2 decides to be a validator. Consequences:
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(2), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Session::set_keys(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(2),
|
|
SessionKeys { other: 2.into() },
|
|
vec![]
|
|
));
|
|
// new stakes:
|
|
// 10: 1000 self vote
|
|
// 20: 1000 self vote + 250 vote
|
|
// 6 : 1000 self vote
|
|
// 2 : 2000 self vote + 250 vote.
|
|
// Winners: 20 and 2
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![2, 20]);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn wrong_vote_is_moot() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.add_staker(
|
|
61,
|
|
60,
|
|
500,
|
|
StakerStatus::Nominator(vec![
|
|
11, 21, // good votes
|
|
1, 2, 15, 1000, 25, // crap votes. No effect.
|
|
]),
|
|
)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// the genesis validators already reflect the above vote, nonetheless start a new era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// new validators
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// our new voter is taken into account
|
|
assert!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).others.iter().any(|i| i.who == 61));
|
|
assert!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21).others.iter().any(|i| i.who == 61));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_no_staked_value() {
|
|
// Behavior when someone bonds with no staked value.
|
|
// Particularly when they votes and the candidate is elected.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(3)
|
|
.existential_deposit(5)
|
|
.balance_factor(5)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Can't bond with 1
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1), 2, 1, RewardDestination::Controller),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond,
|
|
);
|
|
// bonded with absolute minimum value possible.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1),
|
|
2,
|
|
5,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1)[0].amount, 5);
|
|
|
|
// unbonding even 1 will cause all to be unbonded.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(2), 1));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(2),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 1,
|
|
active: 0,
|
|
total: 5,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 5, era: 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// not yet removed.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(RuntimeOrigin::signed(2), 0));
|
|
assert!(Staking::ledger(2).is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1)[0].amount, 5);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// poof. Account 1 is removed from the staking system.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(RuntimeOrigin::signed(2), 0));
|
|
assert!(Staking::ledger(2).is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1).len(), 0);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_little_staked_value_bounded() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(3)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// setup
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(RuntimeOrigin::signed(30)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(10),
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
let init_balance_2 = Balances::free_balance(&2);
|
|
let init_balance_10 = Balances::free_balance(&10);
|
|
|
|
// Stingy validator.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1),
|
|
2,
|
|
1,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(2), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Session::set_keys(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(2),
|
|
SessionKeys { other: 2.into() },
|
|
vec![]
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// 1 era worth of reward. BUT, we set the timestamp after on_initialize, so outdated by
|
|
// one block.
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
reward_all_elected();
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(0);
|
|
|
|
// 2 is elected.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10, 2]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 2).total, 0);
|
|
|
|
// Old ones are rewarded.
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + total_payout_0 / 3,
|
|
1
|
|
);
|
|
// no rewards paid to 2. This was initial election.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(2), init_balance_2);
|
|
|
|
// reward era 2
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
reward_all_elected();
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10, 2]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 2).total, 0);
|
|
|
|
// 2 is now rewarded.
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(2),
|
|
init_balance_2 + total_payout_1 / 3,
|
|
1
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(&10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + total_payout_0 / 3 + total_payout_1 / 3,
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_duplicate_vote_should_be_ignored_by_election_provider() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(2)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.set_stake(31, 1000)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// ensure all have equal stake.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::iter()
|
|
.map(|(v, _)| (v, Staking::ledger(v - 1).unwrap().total))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![(31, 1000), (21, 1000), (11, 1000)],
|
|
);
|
|
// no nominators shall exist.
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::iter().map(|(n, _)| n).collect::<Vec<_>>().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
// give the man some money.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1000;
|
|
for i in [1, 2, 3, 4].iter() {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(i, initial_balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1),
|
|
2,
|
|
1000,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(2), vec![11, 11, 11, 21, 31]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(3),
|
|
4,
|
|
1000,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), vec![21, 31]));
|
|
|
|
// winners should be 21 and 31. Otherwise this election is taking duplicates into
|
|
// account.
|
|
let supports = <Test as Config>::ElectionProvider::elect().unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
supports,
|
|
vec![
|
|
(21, Support { total: 1800, voters: vec![(21, 1000), (1, 400), (3, 400)] }),
|
|
(31, Support { total: 2200, voters: vec![(31, 1000), (1, 600), (3, 600)] })
|
|
],
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_duplicate_vote_should_be_ignored_by_election_provider_elected() {
|
|
// same as above but ensures that even when the dupe is being elected, everything is sane.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(2)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.set_stake(31, 1000)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// ensure all have equal stake.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::iter()
|
|
.map(|(v, _)| (v, Staking::ledger(v - 1).unwrap().total))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![(31, 1000), (21, 1000), (11, 1000)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// no nominators shall exist.
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
// give the man some money.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1000;
|
|
for i in [1, 2, 3, 4].iter() {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(i, initial_balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1),
|
|
2,
|
|
1000,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(2), vec![11, 11, 11, 21]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(3),
|
|
4,
|
|
1000,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), vec![21]));
|
|
|
|
// winners should be 21 and 11.
|
|
let supports = <Test as Config>::ElectionProvider::elect().unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
supports,
|
|
vec![
|
|
(11, Support { total: 1500, voters: vec![(11, 1000), (1, 500)] }),
|
|
(21, Support { total: 2500, voters: vec![(21, 1000), (1, 500), (3, 1000)] })
|
|
],
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn new_era_elects_correct_number_of_validators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).validator_count(1).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(validator_controllers().len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(validator_controllers().len(), 1);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_should_not_overflow() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// This is the maximum value that we can have as the outcome of CurrencyToVote.
|
|
type Votes = u64;
|
|
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10));
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20));
|
|
|
|
bond_validator(3, 2, Votes::max_value() as Balance);
|
|
bond_validator(5, 4, Votes::max_value() as Balance);
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(7, 6, Votes::max_value() as Balance, vec![3, 5]);
|
|
bond_nominator(9, 8, Votes::max_value() as Balance, vec![3, 5]);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![4, 2]);
|
|
|
|
// We can safely convert back to values within [u64, u128].
|
|
assert!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 3).total > Votes::max_value() as Balance);
|
|
assert!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 5).total > Votes::max_value() as Balance);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_validator_slashing_validator_does_not_overflow() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let stake = u64::MAX as Balance * 2;
|
|
let reward_slash = u64::MAX as Balance * 2;
|
|
|
|
// Assert multiplication overflows in balance arithmetic.
|
|
assert!(stake.checked_mul(reward_slash).is_none());
|
|
|
|
// Set staker
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, stake);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Exposure::<AccountId, Balance> { total: stake, own: stake, others: vec![] };
|
|
let reward = EraRewardPoints::<AccountId> {
|
|
total: 1,
|
|
individual: vec![(11, 1)].into_iter().collect(),
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Check reward
|
|
ErasRewardPoints::<Test>::insert(0, reward);
|
|
ErasStakers::<Test>::insert(0, 11, &exposure);
|
|
ErasStakersClipped::<Test>::insert(0, 11, exposure);
|
|
ErasValidatorReward::<Test>::insert(0, stake);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, 0));
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), stake * 2);
|
|
|
|
// Set staker
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, stake);
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&2, stake);
|
|
|
|
// only slashes out of bonded stake are applied. without this line, it is 0.
|
|
Staking::bond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(2), 20000, stake - 1, RewardDestination::default())
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
// Override exposure of 11
|
|
ErasStakers::<Test>::insert(
|
|
0,
|
|
11,
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: stake,
|
|
own: 1,
|
|
others: vec![IndividualExposure { who: 2, value: stake - 1 }],
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Check slashing
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(100)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), stake - 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 1);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_from_authorship_event_handler_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
use pallet_authorship::EventHandler;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(<pallet_authorship::Pallet<Test>>::author(), Some(11));
|
|
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::note_author(11);
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::note_author(11);
|
|
|
|
// Not mandatory but must be coherent with rewards
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
// 21 is rewarded as an uncle producer
|
|
// 11 is rewarded as a block producer and uncle referencer and uncle producer
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
ErasRewardPoints::<Test>::get(active_era()),
|
|
EraRewardPoints { individual: vec![(11, 20 * 2)].into_iter().collect(), total: 40 },
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn add_reward_points_fns_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Not mandatory but must be coherent with rewards
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![21, 11]);
|
|
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 1), (11, 1), (11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 1), (11, 1), (11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
ErasRewardPoints::<Test>::get(active_era()),
|
|
EraRewardPoints { individual: vec![(11, 4), (21, 2)].into_iter().collect(), total: 6 },
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn unbonded_balance_is_not_slashable() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// total amount staked is slashable.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 800));
|
|
|
|
// only the active portion.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&11), 200);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn era_is_always_same_length() {
|
|
// This ensures that the sessions is always of the same length if there is no forcing no
|
|
// session changes.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let session_per_era = <SessionsPerEra as Get<SessionIndex>>::get();
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_start_session_index(current_era()).unwrap(), session_per_era);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_start_session_index(current_era()).unwrap(),
|
|
session_per_era * 2u32
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let session = Session::current_index();
|
|
Staking::set_force_era(Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
advance_session();
|
|
advance_session();
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_start_session_index(current_era()).unwrap(), session + 2);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_start_session_index(current_era()).unwrap(),
|
|
session + 2u32 + session_per_era
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_forces_new_era() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(5)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_ensures_new_era_without_clobbering() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::force_new_era_always(RuntimeOrigin::root()));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceAlways);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(5)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceAlways);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_deselects_validator_even_when_slash_is_zero() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(!Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashing_performed_according_exposure() {
|
|
// This test checks that slashing is performed according the exposure (or more precisely,
|
|
// historical exposure), not the current balance.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).own, 1000);
|
|
|
|
// Handle an offence with a historical exposure.
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Exposure { total: 500, own: 500, others: vec![] }),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The stash account should be slashed for 250 (50% of 500).
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000 - 250);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slash_in_old_span_does_not_deselect() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
assert!(Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), Default::default()).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::contains_key(11));
|
|
assert!(!Session::validators().contains(&11));
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// this staker is in a new slashing span now, having re-registered after
|
|
// their prior slash.
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
1,
|
|
DisableStrategy::WhenSlashed,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// the validator doesn't get chilled again
|
|
assert!(Validators::<Test>::iter().any(|(stash, _)| stash == 11));
|
|
|
|
// but we are still forcing a new era
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
// NOTE: A 100% slash here would clean up the account, causing de-registration.
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(95)],
|
|
1,
|
|
DisableStrategy::WhenSlashed,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// the validator doesn't get chilled again
|
|
assert!(Validators::<Test>::iter().any(|(stash, _)| stash == 11));
|
|
|
|
// but it's disabled
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(10));
|
|
// and we are still forcing a new era
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reporters_receive_their_slice() {
|
|
// This test verifies that the reporters of the offence receive their slice from the slashed
|
|
// amount.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// The reporters' reward is calculated from the total exposure.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1125;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).total, initial_balance);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![1, 2],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// F1 * (reward_proportion * slash - 0)
|
|
// 50% * (10% * initial_balance / 2)
|
|
let reward = (initial_balance / 20) / 2;
|
|
let reward_each = reward / 2; // split into two pieces.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1), 10 + reward_each);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(2), 20 + reward_each);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn subsequent_reports_in_same_span_pay_out_less() {
|
|
// This test verifies that the reporters of the offence receive their slice from the slashed
|
|
// amount, but less and less if they submit multiple reports in one span.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// The reporters' reward is calculated from the total exposure.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1125;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11).total, initial_balance);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![1],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(20)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// F1 * (reward_proportion * slash - 0)
|
|
// 50% * (10% * initial_balance * 20%)
|
|
let reward = (initial_balance / 5) / 20;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1), 10 + reward);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![1],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let prior_payout = reward;
|
|
|
|
// F1 * (reward_proportion * slash - prior_payout)
|
|
// 50% * (10% * (initial_balance / 2) - prior_payout)
|
|
let reward = ((initial_balance / 20) - prior_payout) / 2;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1), 10 + prior_payout + reward);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invulnerables_are_not_slashed() {
|
|
// For invulnerable validators no slashing is performed.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().invulnerables(vec![11]).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21);
|
|
let initial_balance = Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21);
|
|
|
|
let nominator_balances: Vec<_> =
|
|
exposure.others.iter().map(|o| Balances::free_balance(&o.who)).collect();
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50), Perbill::from_percent(20)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator 11 hasn't been slashed, but 21 has been.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// 2000 - (0.2 * initial_balance)
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000 - (2 * initial_balance / 10));
|
|
|
|
// ensure that nominators were slashed as well.
|
|
for (initial_balance, other) in nominator_balances.into_iter().zip(exposure.others) {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(&other.who),
|
|
initial_balance - (2 * other.value / 10),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn dont_slash_if_fraction_is_zero() {
|
|
// Don't slash if the fraction is zero.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator hasn't been slashed. The new era is not forced.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn only_slash_for_max_in_era() {
|
|
// multiple slashes within one era are only applied if it is more than any previous slash in the
|
|
// same era.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator has been slashed and has been force-chilled.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 500);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator has not been slashed additionally.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 500);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(60)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator got slashed 10% more.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 400);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn garbage_collection_after_slashing() {
|
|
// ensures that `SlashingSpans` and `SpanSlash` of an account is removed after reaping.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(2)
|
|
.balance_factor(2)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 2000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 2000 - 200);
|
|
assert!(SlashingSpans::<Test>::get(&11).is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(SpanSlash::<Test>::get(&(11, 0)).amount(), &200);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(100)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// validator and nominator slash in era are garbage-collected by era change,
|
|
// so we don't test those here.
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), 2);
|
|
|
|
let slashing_spans = SlashingSpans::<Test>::get(&11).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(slashing_spans.iter().count(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// reap_stash respects num_slashing_spans so that weight is accurate
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::reap_stash(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20), 11, 0),
|
|
Error::<Test>::IncorrectSlashingSpans
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::reap_stash(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20), 11, 2));
|
|
|
|
assert!(SlashingSpans::<Test>::get(&11).is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(SpanSlash::<Test>::get(&(11, 0)).amount(), &0);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn garbage_collection_on_window_pruning() {
|
|
// ensures that `ValidatorSlashInEra` and `NominatorSlashInEra` are cleared after
|
|
// `BondingDuration`.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
let now = active_era();
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(now, 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(now, 11)), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - (nominated_value / 10));
|
|
|
|
assert!(ValidatorSlashInEra::<Test>::get(&now, &11).is_some());
|
|
assert!(NominatorSlashInEra::<Test>::get(&now, &101).is_some());
|
|
|
|
// + 1 because we have to exit the bonding window.
|
|
for era in (0..(BondingDuration::get() + 1)).map(|offset| offset + now + 1) {
|
|
assert!(ValidatorSlashInEra::<Test>::get(&now, &11).is_some());
|
|
assert!(NominatorSlashInEra::<Test>::get(&now, &101).is_some());
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(era);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert!(ValidatorSlashInEra::<Test>::get(&now, &11).is_none());
|
|
assert!(NominatorSlashInEra::<Test>::get(&now, &101).is_none());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashing_nominators_by_span_max() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21);
|
|
let nominated_value_11 = exposure_11.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
let nominated_value_21 = exposure_21.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
2,
|
|
DisableStrategy::WhenSlashed,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
|
|
let slash_1_amount = Perbill::from_percent(10) * nominated_value_11;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - slash_1_amount);
|
|
|
|
let expected_spans = vec![
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 1, start: 4, length: None },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 0, start: 0, length: Some(4) },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
let get_span = |account| SlashingSpans::<Test>::get(&account).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(get_span(11).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), expected_spans);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(get_span(101).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), expected_spans);
|
|
|
|
// second slash: higher era, higher value, same span.
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(30)],
|
|
3,
|
|
DisableStrategy::WhenSlashed,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 11 was not further slashed, but 21 and 101 were.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1700);
|
|
|
|
let slash_2_amount = Perbill::from_percent(30) * nominated_value_21;
|
|
assert!(slash_2_amount > slash_1_amount);
|
|
|
|
// only the maximum slash in a single span is taken.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - slash_2_amount);
|
|
|
|
// third slash: in same era and on same validator as first, higher
|
|
// in-era value, but lower slash value than slash 2.
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(20)],
|
|
2,
|
|
DisableStrategy::WhenSlashed,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 11 was further slashed, but 21 and 101 were not.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 800);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1700);
|
|
|
|
let slash_3_amount = Perbill::from_percent(20) * nominated_value_21;
|
|
assert!(slash_3_amount < slash_2_amount);
|
|
assert!(slash_3_amount > slash_1_amount);
|
|
|
|
// only the maximum slash in a single span is taken.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - slash_2_amount);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashes_are_summed_across_spans() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let get_span = |account| SlashingSpans::<Test>::get(&account).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let expected_spans = vec![
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 1, start: 4, length: None },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 0, start: 0, length: Some(4) },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(get_span(21).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), expected_spans);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1900);
|
|
|
|
// 21 has been force-chilled. re-signal intent to validate.
|
|
Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20), Default::default()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21), 900);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let expected_spans = vec![
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 2, start: 5, length: None },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 1, start: 4, length: Some(1) },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 0, start: 0, length: Some(4) },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(get_span(21).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), expected_spans);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1810);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn deferred_slashes_are_deferred() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
System::reset_events();
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// nominations are not removed regardless of the deferring.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// at the start of era 4, slashes from era 1 are processed,
|
|
// after being deferred for at least 2 full eras.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - (nominated_value / 10));
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
staking_events_since_last_call().as_slice(),
|
|
&[
|
|
Event::Chilled { stash: 11 },
|
|
Event::ForceEra { mode: Forcing::ForceNew },
|
|
Event::SlashReported { validator: 11, slash_era: 1, .. },
|
|
Event::StakersElected,
|
|
Event::ForceEra { mode: Forcing::NotForcing },
|
|
..,
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 11, amount: 100 },
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 101, amount: 12 }
|
|
]
|
|
));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn retroactive_deferred_slashes_two_eras_before() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(BondingDuration::get(), 3);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
let exposure_11_at_era1 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
System::reset_events();
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure_11_at_era1), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
1, // should be deferred for two full eras, and applied at the beginning of era 4.
|
|
DisableStrategy::Never,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
staking_events_since_last_call().as_slice(),
|
|
&[
|
|
Event::Chilled { stash: 11 },
|
|
Event::ForceEra { mode: Forcing::ForceNew },
|
|
Event::SlashReported { validator: 11, slash_era: 1, .. },
|
|
..,
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 11, amount: 100 },
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 101, amount: 12 }
|
|
]
|
|
));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn retroactive_deferred_slashes_one_before() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(BondingDuration::get(), 3);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
let exposure_11_at_era1 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
|
|
// unbond at slash era.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 100));
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
System::reset_events();
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure_11_at_era1), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
2, // should be deferred for two full eras, and applied at the beginning of era 5.
|
|
DisableStrategy::Never,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(10).unwrap().total, 1000);
|
|
// slash happens after the next line.
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(5);
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
staking_events_since_last_call().as_slice(),
|
|
&[
|
|
Event::SlashReported { validator: 11, slash_era: 2, .. },
|
|
..,
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 11, amount: 100 },
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 101, amount: 12 }
|
|
]
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// their ledger has already been slashed.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(10).unwrap().total, 900);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 1000));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(10).unwrap().total, 900);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn staker_cannot_bail_deferred_slash() {
|
|
// as long as SlashDeferDuration is less than BondingDuration, this should not be possible.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// now we chill
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(RuntimeOrigin::signed(100)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(100), 500));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era().unwrap(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Ledger::<Test>::get(100).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
active: 0,
|
|
total: 500,
|
|
stash: 101,
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { era: 4u32, value: 500 }],
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// no slash yet.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// no slash yet.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era().unwrap(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// no slash yet.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era().unwrap(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 3);
|
|
|
|
// and cannot yet unbond:
|
|
assert_storage_noop!(assert!(
|
|
Staking::withdraw_unbonded(RuntimeOrigin::signed(100), 0).is_ok()
|
|
));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Ledger::<Test>::get(100).unwrap().unlocking.into_inner(),
|
|
vec![UnlockChunk { era: 4u32, value: 500 as Balance }],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// at the start of era 4, slashes from era 1 are processed,
|
|
// after being deferred for at least 2 full eras.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - (nominated_value / 10));
|
|
|
|
// and the leftover of the funds can now be unbonded.
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn remove_deferred() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
// deferred to start of era 4.
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// reported later, but deferred to start of era 4 as well.
|
|
System::reset_events();
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(15)],
|
|
1,
|
|
DisableStrategy::WhenSlashed,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// fails if empty
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 1, vec![]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::EmptyTargets
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// cancel one of them.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 4, vec![0]));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// at the start of era 4, slashes from era 1 are processed,
|
|
// after being deferred for at least 2 full eras.
|
|
mock::start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
// the first slash for 10% was cancelled, but the 15% one not.
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
staking_events_since_last_call().as_slice(),
|
|
&[
|
|
Event::SlashReported { validator: 11, slash_era: 1, .. },
|
|
..,
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 11, amount: 50 },
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 101, amount: 7 }
|
|
]
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
let slash_10 = Perbill::from_percent(10);
|
|
let slash_15 = Perbill::from_percent(15);
|
|
let initial_slash = slash_10 * nominated_value;
|
|
|
|
let total_slash = slash_15 * nominated_value;
|
|
let actual_slash = total_slash - initial_slash;
|
|
|
|
// 5% slash (15 - 10) processed now.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 950);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - actual_slash);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn remove_multi_deferred() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (42, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (69, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(UnappliedSlashes::<Test>::get(&4).len(), 5);
|
|
|
|
// fails if list is not sorted
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 1, vec![2, 0, 4]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotSortedAndUnique
|
|
);
|
|
// fails if list is not unique
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 1, vec![0, 2, 2]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotSortedAndUnique
|
|
);
|
|
// fails if bad index
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 1, vec![1, 2, 3, 4, 5]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidSlashIndex
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 4, vec![0, 2, 4]));
|
|
|
|
let slashes = UnappliedSlashes::<Test>::get(&4);
|
|
assert_eq!(slashes.len(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(slashes[0].validator, 21);
|
|
assert_eq!(slashes[1].validator, 42);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slash_kicks_validators_not_nominators_and_disables_nominator_for_kicked_validator() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
// pre-slash balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// 100 has approval for 11 as of now
|
|
assert!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets.contains(&11));
|
|
|
|
// 11 and 21 both have the support of 100
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), &11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), &21);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(exposure_11.total, 1000 + 125);
|
|
assert_eq!(exposure_21.total, 1000 + 375);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure_11.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
staking_events_since_last_call(),
|
|
vec![
|
|
Event::StakersElected,
|
|
Event::EraPaid { era_index: 0, validator_payout: 11075, remainder: 33225 },
|
|
Event::Chilled { stash: 11 },
|
|
Event::ForceEra { mode: Forcing::ForceNew },
|
|
Event::SlashReported {
|
|
validator: 11,
|
|
fraction: Perbill::from_percent(10),
|
|
slash_era: 1
|
|
},
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 11, amount: 100 },
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 101, amount: 12 },
|
|
]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// post-slash balance
|
|
let nominator_slash_amount_11 = 125 / 10;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - nominator_slash_amount_11);
|
|
|
|
// check that validator was chilled.
|
|
assert!(Validators::<Test>::iter().all(|(stash, _)| stash != 11));
|
|
|
|
// actually re-bond the slashed validator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), Default::default()));
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), &11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), &21);
|
|
|
|
// 11's own expo is reduced. sum of support from 11 is less (448), which is 500
|
|
// 900 + 146
|
|
assert!(matches!(exposure_11, Exposure { own: 900, total: 1046, .. }));
|
|
// 1000 + 342
|
|
assert!(matches!(exposure_21, Exposure { own: 1000, total: 1342, .. }));
|
|
assert_eq!(500 - 146 - 342, nominator_slash_amount_11);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn non_slashable_offence_doesnt_disable_validator() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &21);
|
|
|
|
// offence with no slash associated
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure_11.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::zero()],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// it does NOT affect the nominator.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
// offence that slashes 25% of the bond
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (21, exposure_21.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// it DOES NOT affect the nominator.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
staking_events_since_last_call(),
|
|
vec![
|
|
Event::StakersElected,
|
|
Event::EraPaid { era_index: 0, validator_payout: 11075, remainder: 33225 },
|
|
Event::Chilled { stash: 11 },
|
|
Event::ForceEra { mode: Forcing::ForceNew },
|
|
Event::SlashReported {
|
|
validator: 11,
|
|
fraction: Perbill::from_percent(0),
|
|
slash_era: 1
|
|
},
|
|
Event::Chilled { stash: 21 },
|
|
Event::SlashReported {
|
|
validator: 21,
|
|
fraction: Perbill::from_percent(25),
|
|
slash_era: 1
|
|
},
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 21, amount: 250 },
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 101, amount: 94 }
|
|
]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// the offence for validator 10 wasn't slashable so it wasn't disabled
|
|
assert!(!is_disabled(10));
|
|
// whereas validator 20 gets disabled
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(20));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashing_independent_of_disabling_validator() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &21);
|
|
|
|
let now = Staking::active_era().unwrap().index;
|
|
|
|
// offence with no slash associated, BUT disabling
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure_11.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::zero()],
|
|
now,
|
|
DisableStrategy::Always,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// nomination remains untouched.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
// offence that slashes 25% of the bond, BUT not disabling
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (21, exposure_21.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
now,
|
|
DisableStrategy::Never,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// nomination remains untouched.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
staking_events_since_last_call(),
|
|
vec![
|
|
Event::StakersElected,
|
|
Event::EraPaid { era_index: 0, validator_payout: 11075, remainder: 33225 },
|
|
Event::Chilled { stash: 11 },
|
|
Event::ForceEra { mode: Forcing::ForceNew },
|
|
Event::SlashReported {
|
|
validator: 11,
|
|
fraction: Perbill::from_percent(0),
|
|
slash_era: 1
|
|
},
|
|
Event::Chilled { stash: 21 },
|
|
Event::SlashReported {
|
|
validator: 21,
|
|
fraction: Perbill::from_percent(25),
|
|
slash_era: 1
|
|
},
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 21, amount: 250 },
|
|
Event::Slashed { staker: 101, amount: 94 }
|
|
]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// the offence for validator 10 was explicitly disabled
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(10));
|
|
// whereas validator 20 is explicitly not disabled
|
|
assert!(!is_disabled(20));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_threshold_triggers_new_era() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.set_status(41, StakerStatus::Validator)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21, 31, 41]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Test as Config>::OffendingValidatorsThreshold::get(),
|
|
Perbill::from_percent(75),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// we have 4 validators and an offending validator threshold of 75%,
|
|
// once the third validator commits an offence a new era should be forced
|
|
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &21);
|
|
let exposure_31 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &31);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure_11.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::zero()],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(ForceEra::<Test>::get(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (21, exposure_21.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::zero()],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(ForceEra::<Test>::get(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (31, exposure_31.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::zero()],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(ForceEra::<Test>::get(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn disabled_validators_are_kept_disabled_for_whole_era() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.set_status(41, StakerStatus::Validator)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21, 31, 41]);
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Config>::SessionsPerEra::get(), 3);
|
|
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &21);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure_11.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::zero()],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (21, exposure_21.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// nominations are not updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
// validator 10 should not be disabled since the offence wasn't slashable
|
|
assert!(!is_disabled(10));
|
|
// validator 20 gets disabled since it got slashed
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(20));
|
|
|
|
advance_session();
|
|
|
|
// disabled validators should carry-on through all sessions in the era
|
|
assert!(!is_disabled(10));
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(20));
|
|
|
|
// validator 10 should now get disabled
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure_11.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// nominations are not updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
advance_session();
|
|
|
|
// and both are disabled in the last session of the era
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(10));
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(20));
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// when a new era starts disabled validators get cleared
|
|
assert!(!is_disabled(10));
|
|
assert!(!is_disabled(20));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn claim_reward_at_the_last_era_and_no_double_claim_and_invalid_claim() {
|
|
// should check that:
|
|
// * rewards get paid until history_depth for both validators and nominators
|
|
// * an invalid era to claim doesn't update last_reward
|
|
// * double claim of one era fails
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Consumed weight for all payout_stakers dispatches that fail
|
|
let err_weight = <Test as Config>::WeightInfo::payout_stakers_alive_staked(0);
|
|
|
|
let init_balance_10 = Balances::total_balance(&10);
|
|
let init_balance_100 = Balances::total_balance(&100);
|
|
|
|
let part_for_10 = Perbill::from_rational::<u32>(1000, 1125);
|
|
let part_for_100 = Perbill::from_rational::<u32>(125, 1125);
|
|
|
|
// Check state
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
Payee::<Test>::insert(101, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// Change total issuance in order to modify total payout
|
|
let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&999, 1_000_000_000);
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 != total_payout_0);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// Change total issuance in order to modify total payout
|
|
let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&999, 1_000_000_000);
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_2 = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
assert!(total_payout_2 != total_payout_0);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_2 != total_payout_1);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(HistoryDepth::get() + 1);
|
|
|
|
let active_era = active_era();
|
|
|
|
// This is the latest planned era in staking, not the active era
|
|
let current_era = Staking::current_era().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// Last kept is 1:
|
|
assert!(current_era - HistoryDepth::get() == 1);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, 0),
|
|
// Fail: Era out of history
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, 1));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, 2));
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, 2),
|
|
// Fail: Double claim
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyClaimed.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, active_era),
|
|
// Fail: Era not finished yet
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Era 0 can't be rewarded anymore and current era can't be rewarded yet
|
|
// only era 1 and 2 can be rewarded.
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + part_for_10 * (total_payout_1 + total_payout_2),
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&100),
|
|
init_balance_100 + part_for_100 * (total_payout_1 + total_payout_2),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn zero_slash_keeps_nominators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails { offender: (11, exposure.clone()), reporters: vec![] }],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// 11 is still removed..
|
|
assert!(Validators::<Test>::iter().all(|(stash, _)| stash != 11));
|
|
// but their nominations are kept.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn six_session_delay() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().initialize_first_session(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
use pallet_session::SessionManager;
|
|
|
|
let val_set = Session::validators();
|
|
let init_session = Session::current_index();
|
|
let init_active_era = active_era();
|
|
|
|
// pallet-session is delaying session by one, thus the next session to plan is +2.
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 2), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 3),
|
|
Some(val_set.clone())
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 4), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 5), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::new_session(init_session + 6),
|
|
Some(val_set.clone())
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), init_active_era);
|
|
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 1);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), init_active_era);
|
|
|
|
// Reward current era
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// New active era is triggered here.
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 2);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), init_active_era + 1);
|
|
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 3);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), init_active_era + 1);
|
|
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 4);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), init_active_era + 1);
|
|
|
|
// Reward current era
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 2)]);
|
|
|
|
// New active era is triggered here.
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::end_session(init_session + 5);
|
|
<Staking as SessionManager<_>>::start_session(init_session + 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), init_active_era + 2);
|
|
|
|
// That reward are correct
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_reward_points(init_active_era).total, 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::eras_reward_points(init_active_era + 1).total, 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn test_max_nominator_rewarded_per_validator_and_cant_steal_someone_else_reward() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
for i in 0..=<<Test as Config>::MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator as Get<_>>::get() {
|
|
let stash = 10_000 + i as AccountId;
|
|
let controller = 20_000 + i as AccountId;
|
|
let balance = 10_000 + i as Balance;
|
|
Balances::make_free_balance_be(&stash, balance);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(stash),
|
|
controller,
|
|
balance,
|
|
RewardDestination::Stash
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(controller), vec![11]));
|
|
}
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
Pallet::<Test>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
mock::make_all_reward_payment(1);
|
|
|
|
// Assert only nominators from 1 to Max are rewarded
|
|
for i in 0..=<<Test as Config>::MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator as Get<_>>::get() {
|
|
let stash = 10_000 + i as AccountId;
|
|
let balance = 10_000 + i as Balance;
|
|
if stash == 10_000 {
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(&stash) == balance);
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(&stash) > balance);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn test_payout_stakers() {
|
|
// Test that payout_stakers work in general, including that only the top
|
|
// `T::MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator` nominators are rewarded.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let balance = 1000;
|
|
// Track the exposure of the validator and all nominators.
|
|
let mut total_exposure = balance;
|
|
// Track the exposure of the validator and the nominators that will get paid out.
|
|
let mut payout_exposure = balance;
|
|
// Create a validator:
|
|
bond_validator(11, 10, balance); // Default(64)
|
|
assert_eq!(Validators::<Test>::count(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Create nominators, targeting stash of validators
|
|
for i in 0..100 {
|
|
let bond_amount = balance + i as Balance;
|
|
bond_nominator(1000 + i, 100 + i, bond_amount, vec![11]);
|
|
total_exposure += bond_amount;
|
|
if i >= 36 {
|
|
payout_exposure += bond_amount;
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
let payout_exposure_part = Perbill::from_rational(payout_exposure, total_exposure);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let payout = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
let actual_paid_out = payout_exposure_part * payout;
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
let pre_payout_total_issuance = Balances::total_issuance();
|
|
RewardOnUnbalanceWasCalled::set(false);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, 1));
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_issuance(),
|
|
pre_payout_total_issuance + actual_paid_out,
|
|
1
|
|
);
|
|
assert!(RewardOnUnbalanceWasCalled::get());
|
|
|
|
// Top 64 nominators of validator 11 automatically paid out, including the validator
|
|
// Validator payout goes to controller.
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(&10) > balance);
|
|
for i in 36..100 {
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(&(100 + i)) > balance + i as Balance);
|
|
}
|
|
// The bottom 36 do not
|
|
for i in 0..36 {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&(100 + i)), balance + i as Balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We track rewards in `claimed_rewards` vec
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![1]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
for i in 3..16 {
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let payout = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
let actual_paid_out = payout_exposure_part * payout;
|
|
let pre_payout_total_issuance = Balances::total_issuance();
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(i);
|
|
RewardOnUnbalanceWasCalled::set(false);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, i - 1));
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_issuance(),
|
|
pre_payout_total_issuance + actual_paid_out,
|
|
1
|
|
);
|
|
assert!(RewardOnUnbalanceWasCalled::get());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We track rewards in `claimed_rewards` vec
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: (1..=14).collect::<Vec<_>>().try_into().unwrap()
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let last_era = 99;
|
|
let history_depth = HistoryDepth::get();
|
|
let expected_last_reward_era = last_era - 1;
|
|
let expected_start_reward_era = last_era - history_depth;
|
|
for i in 16..=last_era {
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
mock::start_active_era(i);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We clean it up as history passes
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337),
|
|
11,
|
|
expected_start_reward_era
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337),
|
|
11,
|
|
expected_last_reward_era
|
|
));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![expected_start_reward_era, expected_last_reward_era]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Out of order claims works.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, 69));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, 23));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, 42));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![
|
|
expected_start_reward_era,
|
|
23,
|
|
42,
|
|
69,
|
|
expected_last_reward_era
|
|
]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn payout_stakers_handles_basic_errors() {
|
|
// Here we will test payouts handle all errors.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Consumed weight for all payout_stakers dispatches that fail
|
|
let err_weight = <Test as Config>::WeightInfo::payout_stakers_alive_staked(0);
|
|
|
|
// Same setup as the test above
|
|
let balance = 1000;
|
|
bond_validator(11, 10, balance); // Default(64)
|
|
|
|
// Create nominators, targeting stash
|
|
for i in 0..100 {
|
|
bond_nominator(1000 + i, 100 + i, balance + i as Balance, vec![11]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// Wrong Era, too big
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, 2),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
// Wrong Staker
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 10, 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotStash.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let last_era = 99;
|
|
for i in 3..=last_era {
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
mock::start_active_era(i);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let history_depth = HistoryDepth::get();
|
|
let expected_last_reward_era = last_era - 1;
|
|
let expected_start_reward_era = last_era - history_depth;
|
|
|
|
// We are at era last_era=99. Given history_depth=80, we should be able
|
|
// to payout era starting from expected_start_reward_era=19 through
|
|
// expected_last_reward_era=98 (80 total eras), but not 18 or 99.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, expected_start_reward_era - 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, expected_last_reward_era + 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEraToReward.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337),
|
|
11,
|
|
expected_start_reward_era
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337),
|
|
11,
|
|
expected_last_reward_era
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// Can't claim again
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, expected_start_reward_era),
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyClaimed.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, expected_last_reward_era),
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyClaimed.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn payout_stakers_handles_weight_refund() {
|
|
// Note: this test relies on the assumption that `payout_stakers_alive_staked` is solely used by
|
|
// `payout_stakers` to calculate the weight of each payout op.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let max_nom_rewarded =
|
|
<<Test as Config>::MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator as Get<_>>::get();
|
|
// Make sure the configured value is meaningful for our use.
|
|
assert!(max_nom_rewarded >= 4);
|
|
let half_max_nom_rewarded = max_nom_rewarded / 2;
|
|
// Sanity check our max and half max nominator quantities.
|
|
assert!(half_max_nom_rewarded > 0);
|
|
assert!(max_nom_rewarded > half_max_nom_rewarded);
|
|
|
|
let max_nom_rewarded_weight =
|
|
<Test as Config>::WeightInfo::payout_stakers_alive_staked(max_nom_rewarded);
|
|
let half_max_nom_rewarded_weight =
|
|
<Test as Config>::WeightInfo::payout_stakers_alive_staked(half_max_nom_rewarded);
|
|
let zero_nom_payouts_weight = <Test as Config>::WeightInfo::payout_stakers_alive_staked(0);
|
|
assert!(zero_nom_payouts_weight.any_gt(Weight::zero()));
|
|
assert!(half_max_nom_rewarded_weight.any_gt(zero_nom_payouts_weight));
|
|
assert!(max_nom_rewarded_weight.any_gt(half_max_nom_rewarded_weight));
|
|
|
|
let balance = 1000;
|
|
bond_validator(11, 10, balance);
|
|
|
|
// Era 1
|
|
start_active_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Reward just the validator.
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// Add some `half_max_nom_rewarded` nominators who will start backing the validator in the
|
|
// next era.
|
|
for i in 0..half_max_nom_rewarded {
|
|
bond_nominator((1000 + i).into(), (100 + i).into(), balance + i as Balance, vec![11]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Era 2
|
|
start_active_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// Collect payouts when there are no nominators
|
|
let call = TestCall::Staking(StakingCall::payout_stakers { validator_stash: 11, era: 1 });
|
|
let info = call.get_dispatch_info();
|
|
let result = call.dispatch(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20));
|
|
assert_ok!(result);
|
|
assert_eq!(extract_actual_weight(&result, &info), zero_nom_payouts_weight);
|
|
|
|
// The validator is not rewarded in this era; so there will be zero payouts to claim for
|
|
// this era.
|
|
|
|
// Era 3
|
|
start_active_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// Collect payouts for an era where the validator did not receive any points.
|
|
let call = TestCall::Staking(StakingCall::payout_stakers { validator_stash: 11, era: 2 });
|
|
let info = call.get_dispatch_info();
|
|
let result = call.dispatch(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20));
|
|
assert_ok!(result);
|
|
assert_eq!(extract_actual_weight(&result, &info), zero_nom_payouts_weight);
|
|
|
|
// Reward the validator and its nominators.
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// Era 4
|
|
start_active_era(4);
|
|
|
|
// Collect payouts when the validator has `half_max_nom_rewarded` nominators.
|
|
let call = TestCall::Staking(StakingCall::payout_stakers { validator_stash: 11, era: 3 });
|
|
let info = call.get_dispatch_info();
|
|
let result = call.dispatch(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20));
|
|
assert_ok!(result);
|
|
assert_eq!(extract_actual_weight(&result, &info), half_max_nom_rewarded_weight);
|
|
|
|
// Add enough nominators so that we are at the limit. They will be active nominators
|
|
// in the next era.
|
|
for i in half_max_nom_rewarded..max_nom_rewarded {
|
|
bond_nominator((1000 + i).into(), (100 + i).into(), balance + i as Balance, vec![11]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Era 5
|
|
start_active_era(5);
|
|
// We now have `max_nom_rewarded` nominators actively nominating our validator.
|
|
|
|
// Reward the validator so we can collect for everyone in the next era.
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// Era 6
|
|
start_active_era(6);
|
|
|
|
// Collect payouts when the validator had `half_max_nom_rewarded` nominators.
|
|
let call = TestCall::Staking(StakingCall::payout_stakers { validator_stash: 11, era: 5 });
|
|
let info = call.get_dispatch_info();
|
|
let result = call.dispatch(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20));
|
|
assert_ok!(result);
|
|
assert_eq!(extract_actual_weight(&result, &info), max_nom_rewarded_weight);
|
|
|
|
// Try and collect payouts for an era that has already been collected.
|
|
let call = TestCall::Staking(StakingCall::payout_stakers { validator_stash: 11, era: 5 });
|
|
let info = call.get_dispatch_info();
|
|
let result = call.dispatch(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20));
|
|
assert!(result.is_err());
|
|
// When there is an error the consumed weight == weight when there are 0 nominator payouts.
|
|
assert_eq!(extract_actual_weight(&result, &info), zero_nom_payouts_weight);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_during_era_correctly_populates_claimed_rewards() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// Era = None
|
|
bond_validator(9, 8, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&8),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 9,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
mock::start_active_era(5);
|
|
bond_validator(11, 10, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: (0..5).collect::<Vec<_>>().try_into().unwrap(),
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// make sure only era upto history depth is stored
|
|
let current_era = 99;
|
|
let last_reward_era = 99 - HistoryDepth::get();
|
|
mock::start_active_era(current_era);
|
|
bond_validator(13, 12, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&12),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 13,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: (last_reward_era..current_era)
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
|
|
.try_into()
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offences_weight_calculated_correctly() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// On offence with zero offenders: 4 Reads, 1 Write
|
|
let zero_offence_weight =
|
|
<Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(4, 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::on_offence(&[], &[Perbill::from_percent(50)], 0, DisableStrategy::WhenSlashed),
|
|
zero_offence_weight
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// On Offence with N offenders, Unapplied: 4 Reads, 1 Write + 4 Reads, 5 Writes
|
|
let n_offence_unapplied_weight = <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get()
|
|
.reads_writes(4, 1) +
|
|
<Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(4, 5);
|
|
|
|
let offenders: Vec<
|
|
OffenceDetails<
|
|
<Test as frame_system::Config>::AccountId,
|
|
pallet_session::historical::IdentificationTuple<Test>,
|
|
>,
|
|
> = (1..10)
|
|
.map(|i| OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (i, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), i)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
.collect();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::on_offence(
|
|
&offenders,
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
0,
|
|
DisableStrategy::WhenSlashed
|
|
),
|
|
n_offence_unapplied_weight
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// On Offence with one offenders, Applied
|
|
let one_offender = [OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![1],
|
|
}];
|
|
|
|
let n = 1; // Number of offenders
|
|
let rw = 3 + 3 * n; // rw reads and writes
|
|
let one_offence_unapplied_weight =
|
|
<Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(4, 1)
|
|
+
|
|
<Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(rw, rw)
|
|
// One `slash_cost`
|
|
+ <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(6, 5)
|
|
// `slash_cost` * nominators (1)
|
|
+ <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(6, 5)
|
|
// `reward_cost` * reporters (1)
|
|
+ <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads_writes(2, 2)
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::on_offence(
|
|
&one_offender,
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
0,
|
|
DisableStrategy::WhenSlashed{}
|
|
),
|
|
one_offence_unapplied_weight
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn payout_creates_controller() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let balance = 1000;
|
|
// Create a validator:
|
|
bond_validator(11, 10, balance);
|
|
|
|
// Create a stash/controller pair
|
|
bond_nominator(1234, 1337, 100, vec![11]);
|
|
|
|
// kill controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer_allow_death(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 1234, 100));
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1337), 0);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, 1));
|
|
|
|
// Controller is created
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(1337) > 0);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn payout_to_any_account_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let balance = 1000;
|
|
// Create a validator:
|
|
bond_validator(11, 10, balance); // Default(64)
|
|
|
|
// Create a stash/controller pair
|
|
bond_nominator(1234, 1337, 100, vec![11]);
|
|
|
|
// Update payout location
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), RewardDestination::Account(42)));
|
|
|
|
// Reward Destination account doesn't exist
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(42), 0);
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(1);
|
|
Staking::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
// compute and ensure the reward amount is greater than zero.
|
|
let _ = current_total_payout_for_duration(reward_time_per_era());
|
|
mock::start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 11, 1));
|
|
|
|
// Payment is successful
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(42) > 0);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn session_buffering_with_offset() {
|
|
// similar to live-chains, have some offset for the first session
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offset(2)
|
|
.period(5)
|
|
.session_per_era(5)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 2);
|
|
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 7);
|
|
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 12);
|
|
|
|
// active era is lagging behind by one session, because of how session module works.
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 17);
|
|
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 22);
|
|
|
|
// go all the way to active 2.
|
|
start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 10);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn session_buffering_no_offset() {
|
|
// no offset, first session starts immediately
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.offset(0)
|
|
.period(5)
|
|
.session_per_era(5)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 5);
|
|
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 10);
|
|
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 15);
|
|
|
|
// active era is lagging behind by one session, because of how session module works.
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 20);
|
|
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(System::block_number(), 25);
|
|
|
|
// go all the way to active 2.
|
|
start_active_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(current_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(active_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 10);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_rebond_to_lower_than_ed() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(10)
|
|
.balance_factor(10)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// initial stuff.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 10 * 1000,
|
|
active: 10 * 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// unbond all of it. must be chilled first.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20), 10 * 1000));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 10 * 1000,
|
|
active: 0,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 10 * 1000, era: 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// now bond a wee bit more
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::rebond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20), 5),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_bond_extra_to_lower_than_ed() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(10)
|
|
.balance_factor(10)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// initial stuff.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 10 * 1000,
|
|
active: 10 * 1000,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// unbond all of it. must be chilled first.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20), 10 * 1000));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 10 * 1000,
|
|
active: 0,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 10 * 1000, era: 3 }],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// now bond a wee bit more
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond_extra(RuntimeOrigin::signed(21), 5),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn do_not_die_when_active_is_ed() {
|
|
let ed = 10;
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(ed)
|
|
.balance_factor(ed)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// given
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: 1000 * ed,
|
|
active: 1000 * ed,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// when unbond all of it except ed.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20), 999 * ed));
|
|
start_active_era(3);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20), 100));
|
|
|
|
// then
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 21,
|
|
total: ed,
|
|
active: ed,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn on_finalize_weight_is_nonzero() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let on_finalize_weight = <Test as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight::get().reads(1);
|
|
assert!(<Staking as Hooks<u64>>::on_initialize(1).all_gte(on_finalize_weight));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mod election_data_provider {
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
use frame_election_provider_support::ElectionDataProvider;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn targets_2sec_block() {
|
|
let mut validators = 1000;
|
|
while <Test as Config>::WeightInfo::get_npos_targets(validators).all_lt(Weight::from_parts(
|
|
2u64 * frame_support::weights::constants::WEIGHT_REF_TIME_PER_SECOND,
|
|
u64::MAX,
|
|
)) {
|
|
validators += 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
println!("Can create a snapshot of {} validators in 2sec block", validators);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn voters_2sec_block() {
|
|
// we assume a network only wants up to 1000 validators in most cases, thus having 2000
|
|
// candidates is as high as it gets.
|
|
let validators = 2000;
|
|
let mut nominators = 1000;
|
|
|
|
while <Test as Config>::WeightInfo::get_npos_voters(validators, nominators).all_lt(
|
|
Weight::from_parts(
|
|
2u64 * frame_support::weights::constants::WEIGHT_REF_TIME_PER_SECOND,
|
|
u64::MAX,
|
|
),
|
|
) {
|
|
nominators += 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
println!(
|
|
"Can create a snapshot of {} nominators [{} validators, each 1 slashing] in 2sec block",
|
|
nominators, validators
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn set_minimum_active_stake_is_correct() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.add_staker(61, 60, 2_000, StakerStatus::<AccountId>::Nominator(vec![21]))
|
|
.add_staker(71, 70, 10, StakerStatus::<AccountId>::Nominator(vec![21]))
|
|
.add_staker(81, 80, 50, StakerStatus::<AccountId>::Nominator(vec![21]))
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_ok!(<Staking as ElectionDataProvider>::electing_voters(None));
|
|
assert_eq!(MinimumActiveStake::<Test>::get(), 10);
|
|
|
|
// remove staker with lower bond by limiting the number of voters and check
|
|
// `MinimumActiveStake` again after electing voters.
|
|
assert_ok!(<Staking as ElectionDataProvider>::electing_voters(Some(5)));
|
|
assert_eq!(MinimumActiveStake::<Test>::get(), 50);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn set_minimum_active_stake_zero_correct() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().has_stakers(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_ok!(<Staking as ElectionDataProvider>::electing_voters(None));
|
|
assert_eq!(MinimumActiveStake::<Test>::get(), 0);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn voters_include_self_vote() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::iter().map(|(x, _)| x).all(|v| Staking::electing_voters(
|
|
None
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.any(|(w, _, t)| { v == w && t[0] == w })))
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn respects_snapshot_len_limits() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.set_status(41, StakerStatus::Validator)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// sum of all nominators who'd be voters (1), plus the self-votes (4).
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Config>::VoterList::count(), 5);
|
|
|
|
// if limits is less..
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::electing_voters(Some(1)).unwrap().len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// if limit is equal..
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::electing_voters(Some(5)).unwrap().len(), 5);
|
|
|
|
// if limit is more.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::electing_voters(Some(55)).unwrap().len(), 5);
|
|
|
|
// if target limit is more..
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::electable_targets(Some(6)).unwrap().len(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::electable_targets(Some(4)).unwrap().len(), 4);
|
|
|
|
// if target limit is less, then we return an error.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::electable_targets(Some(1)).unwrap_err(),
|
|
"Target snapshot too big"
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Tests the criteria that in `ElectionDataProvider::voters` function, we try to get at most
|
|
// `maybe_max_len` voters, and if some of them end up being skipped, we iterate at most `2 *
|
|
// maybe_max_len`.
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn only_iterates_max_2_times_max_allowed_len() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
// the best way to invalidate a bunch of nominators is to have them nominate a lot of
|
|
// ppl, but then lower the MaxNomination limit.
|
|
.add_staker(
|
|
61,
|
|
60,
|
|
2_000,
|
|
StakerStatus::<AccountId>::Nominator(vec![21, 22, 23, 24, 25]),
|
|
)
|
|
.add_staker(
|
|
71,
|
|
70,
|
|
2_000,
|
|
StakerStatus::<AccountId>::Nominator(vec![21, 22, 23, 24, 25]),
|
|
)
|
|
.add_staker(
|
|
81,
|
|
80,
|
|
2_000,
|
|
StakerStatus::<AccountId>::Nominator(vec![21, 22, 23, 24, 25]),
|
|
)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// all voters ordered by stake,
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Test as Config>::VoterList::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![61, 71, 81, 11, 21, 31]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
MaxNominations::set(2);
|
|
|
|
// we want 2 voters now, and in maximum we allow 4 iterations. This is what happens:
|
|
// 61 is pruned;
|
|
// 71 is pruned;
|
|
// 81 is pruned;
|
|
// 11 is taken;
|
|
// we finish since the 2x limit is reached.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::electing_voters(Some(2))
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.map(|(stash, _, _)| stash)
|
|
.copied()
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![11],
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn estimate_next_election_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().session_per_era(5).period(5).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// first session is always length 0.
|
|
for b in 1..20 {
|
|
run_to_block(b);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 20);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// election
|
|
run_to_block(20);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 45);
|
|
assert_eq!(staking_events().len(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(*staking_events().last().unwrap(), Event::StakersElected);
|
|
|
|
for b in 21..45 {
|
|
run_to_block(b);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 45);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// election
|
|
run_to_block(45);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 70);
|
|
assert_eq!(staking_events().len(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(*staking_events().last().unwrap(), Event::StakersElected);
|
|
|
|
Staking::force_no_eras(RuntimeOrigin::root()).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), u64::MAX);
|
|
|
|
Staking::force_new_era_always(RuntimeOrigin::root()).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 45 + 5);
|
|
|
|
Staking::force_new_era(RuntimeOrigin::root()).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 45 + 5);
|
|
|
|
// Do a fail election
|
|
MinimumValidatorCount::<Test>::put(1000);
|
|
run_to_block(50);
|
|
// Election: failed, next session is a new election
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 50 + 5);
|
|
// The new era is still forced until a new era is planned.
|
|
assert_eq!(ForceEra::<Test>::get(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
|
|
MinimumValidatorCount::<Test>::put(2);
|
|
run_to_block(55);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::next_election_prediction(System::block_number()), 55 + 25);
|
|
assert_eq!(staking_events().len(), 10);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
*staking_events().last().unwrap(),
|
|
Event::ForceEra { mode: Forcing::NotForcing }
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
*staking_events().get(staking_events().len() - 2).unwrap(),
|
|
Event::StakersElected
|
|
);
|
|
// The new era has been planned, forcing is changed from `ForceNew` to `NotForcing`.
|
|
assert_eq!(ForceEra::<Test>::get(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
#[should_panic]
|
|
fn count_check_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// We should never insert into the validators or nominators map directly as this will
|
|
// not keep track of the count. This test should panic as we verify the count is accurate
|
|
// after every test using the `post_checks` in `mock`.
|
|
Validators::<Test>::insert(987654321, ValidatorPrefs::default());
|
|
Nominators::<Test>::insert(
|
|
987654321,
|
|
Nominations {
|
|
targets: Default::default(),
|
|
submitted_in: Default::default(),
|
|
suppressed: false,
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn min_bond_checks_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(100)
|
|
.balance_factor(100)
|
|
.min_nominator_bond(1_000)
|
|
.min_validator_bond(1_500)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// 500 is not enough for any role
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(3),
|
|
4,
|
|
500,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), vec![1]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 1000 is enough for nominator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(RuntimeOrigin::signed(3), 500));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), vec![1]));
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 1500 is enough for validator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(RuntimeOrigin::signed(3), 500));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), vec![1]));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
// Can't unbond anything as validator
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 500),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Once they are a nominator, they can unbond 500
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), vec![1]));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 500));
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 500),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientBond
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Once they are chilled they can unbond everything
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 1000));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn chill_other_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(100)
|
|
.balance_factor(100)
|
|
.min_nominator_bond(1_000)
|
|
.min_validator_bond(1_500)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let initial_validators = Validators::<Test>::count();
|
|
let initial_nominators = Nominators::<Test>::count();
|
|
for i in 0..15 {
|
|
let a = 4 * i;
|
|
let b = 4 * i + 1;
|
|
let c = 4 * i + 2;
|
|
let d = 4 * i + 3;
|
|
Balances::make_free_balance_be(&a, 100_000);
|
|
Balances::make_free_balance_be(&b, 100_000);
|
|
Balances::make_free_balance_be(&c, 100_000);
|
|
Balances::make_free_balance_be(&d, 100_000);
|
|
|
|
// Nominator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(a),
|
|
b,
|
|
1000,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(b), vec![1]));
|
|
|
|
// Validator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(c),
|
|
d,
|
|
1500,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(d), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// To chill other users, we need to:
|
|
// * Set a minimum bond amount
|
|
// * Set a limit
|
|
// * Set a threshold
|
|
//
|
|
// If any of these are missing, we do not have enough information to allow the
|
|
// `chill_other` to succeed from one user to another.
|
|
|
|
// Can't chill these users
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 3),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Change the minimum bond... but no limits.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_configs(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::root(),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(1_500),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(2_000),
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// Still can't chill these users
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 3),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Add limits, but no threshold
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_configs(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::root(),
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(10),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(10),
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// Still can't chill these users
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 3),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Add threshold, but no limits
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_configs(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::root(),
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// Still can't chill these users
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 3),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Add threshold and limits
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_configs(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::root(),
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(10),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(10),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(Percent::from_percent(75)),
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// 16 people total because tests start with 2 active one
|
|
assert_eq!(Nominators::<Test>::count(), 15 + initial_nominators);
|
|
assert_eq!(Validators::<Test>::count(), 15 + initial_validators);
|
|
|
|
// Users can now be chilled down to 7 people, so we try to remove 9 of them (starting
|
|
// with 16)
|
|
for i in 6..15 {
|
|
let b = 4 * i + 1;
|
|
let d = 4 * i + 3;
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), b));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), d));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// chill a nominator. Limit is not reached, not chill-able
|
|
assert_eq!(Nominators::<Test>::count(), 7);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CannotChillOther
|
|
);
|
|
// chill a validator. Limit is reached, chill-able.
|
|
assert_eq!(Validators::<Test>::count(), 9);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1337), 3));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn capped_stakers_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let validator_count = Validators::<Test>::count();
|
|
assert_eq!(validator_count, 3);
|
|
let nominator_count = Nominators::<Test>::count();
|
|
assert_eq!(nominator_count, 1);
|
|
|
|
// Change the maximums
|
|
let max = 10;
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_configs(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::root(),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(10),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(10),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(max),
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(max),
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// can create `max - validator_count` validators
|
|
let mut some_existing_validator = AccountId::default();
|
|
for i in 0..max - validator_count {
|
|
let (_, controller) = testing_utils::create_stash_controller::<Test>(
|
|
i + 10_000_000,
|
|
100,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller,
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(controller),
|
|
ValidatorPrefs::default()
|
|
));
|
|
some_existing_validator = controller;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// but no more
|
|
let (_, last_validator) = testing_utils::create_stash_controller::<Test>(
|
|
1337,
|
|
100,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller,
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(last_validator), ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::TooManyValidators,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// same with nominators
|
|
let mut some_existing_nominator = AccountId::default();
|
|
for i in 0..max - nominator_count {
|
|
let (_, controller) = testing_utils::create_stash_controller::<Test>(
|
|
i + 20_000_000,
|
|
100,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller,
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(controller), vec![1]));
|
|
some_existing_nominator = controller;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// one more is too many
|
|
let (_, last_nominator) = testing_utils::create_stash_controller::<Test>(
|
|
30_000_000,
|
|
100,
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller,
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(last_nominator), vec![1]),
|
|
Error::<Test>::TooManyNominators
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-nominate works fine
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(some_existing_nominator), vec![1]));
|
|
// Re-validate works fine
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(some_existing_validator),
|
|
ValidatorPrefs::default()
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// No problem when we set to `None` again
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_configs(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::root(),
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
ConfigOp::Noop,
|
|
));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(last_nominator), vec![1]));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(last_validator),
|
|
ValidatorPrefs::default()
|
|
));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn min_commission_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// account 10 controls the stash from account 11
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(10),
|
|
ValidatorPrefs { commission: Perbill::from_percent(5), blocked: false }
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// event emitted should be correct
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
*staking_events().last().unwrap(),
|
|
Event::ValidatorPrefsSet {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
prefs: ValidatorPrefs { commission: Perbill::from_percent(5), blocked: false }
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_staking_configs(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::root(),
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Remove,
|
|
ConfigOp::Set(Perbill::from_percent(10)),
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// can't make it less than 10 now
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(10),
|
|
ValidatorPrefs { commission: Perbill::from_percent(5), blocked: false }
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CommissionTooLow
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// can only change to higher.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(10),
|
|
ValidatorPrefs { commission: Perbill::from_percent(10), blocked: false }
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(10),
|
|
ValidatorPrefs { commission: Perbill::from_percent(15), blocked: false }
|
|
));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn change_of_max_nominations() {
|
|
use frame_election_provider_support::ElectionDataProvider;
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.add_staker(60, 61, 10, StakerStatus::Nominator(vec![1]))
|
|
.add_staker(70, 71, 10, StakerStatus::Nominator(vec![1, 2, 3]))
|
|
.balance_factor(10)
|
|
.build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// pre-condition
|
|
assert_eq!(MaxNominations::get(), 16);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Nominators::<Test>::iter()
|
|
.map(|(k, n)| (k, n.targets.len()))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![(70, 3), (101, 2), (60, 1)]
|
|
);
|
|
// 3 validators and 3 nominators
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::electing_voters(None).unwrap().len(), 3 + 3);
|
|
|
|
// abrupt change from 16 to 4, everyone should be fine.
|
|
MaxNominations::set(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Nominators::<Test>::iter()
|
|
.map(|(k, n)| (k, n.targets.len()))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![(70, 3), (101, 2), (60, 1)]
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::electing_voters(None).unwrap().len(), 3 + 3);
|
|
|
|
// abrupt change from 4 to 3, everyone should be fine.
|
|
MaxNominations::set(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Nominators::<Test>::iter()
|
|
.map(|(k, n)| (k, n.targets.len()))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![(70, 3), (101, 2), (60, 1)]
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::electing_voters(None).unwrap().len(), 3 + 3);
|
|
|
|
// abrupt change from 3 to 2, this should cause some nominators to be non-decodable, and
|
|
// thus non-existent unless if they update.
|
|
MaxNominations::set(2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Nominators::<Test>::iter()
|
|
.map(|(k, n)| (k, n.targets.len()))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![(101, 2), (60, 1)]
|
|
);
|
|
// 70 is still in storage..
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::contains_key(70));
|
|
// but its value cannot be decoded and default is returned.
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::get(70).is_none());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::electing_voters(None).unwrap().len(), 3 + 2);
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::contains_key(101));
|
|
|
|
// abrupt change from 2 to 1, this should cause some nominators to be non-decodable, and
|
|
// thus non-existent unless if they update.
|
|
MaxNominations::set(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Nominators::<Test>::iter()
|
|
.map(|(k, n)| (k, n.targets.len()))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![(60, 1)]
|
|
);
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::contains_key(70));
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::contains_key(60));
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::get(70).is_none());
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::get(60).is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::electing_voters(None).unwrap().len(), 3 + 1);
|
|
|
|
// now one of them can revive themselves by re-nominating to a proper value.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(71), vec![1]));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Nominators::<Test>::iter()
|
|
.map(|(k, n)| (k, n.targets.len()))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![(70, 1), (60, 1)]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// or they can be chilled by any account.
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::contains_key(101));
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::get(101).is_none());
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill_other(RuntimeOrigin::signed(70), 100));
|
|
assert!(!Nominators::<Test>::contains_key(101));
|
|
assert!(Nominators::<Test>::get(101).is_none());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mod sorted_list_provider {
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
use frame_election_provider_support::SortedListProvider;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn re_nominate_does_not_change_counters_or_list() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// given
|
|
let pre_insert_voter_count =
|
|
(Nominators::<Test>::count() + Validators::<Test>::count()) as u32;
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Config>::VoterList::count(), pre_insert_voter_count);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Test as Config>::VoterList::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![11, 21, 31, 101]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// when account 101 renominates
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(100), vec![41]));
|
|
|
|
// then counts don't change
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Config>::VoterList::count(), pre_insert_voter_count);
|
|
// and the list is the same
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Test as Config>::VoterList::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
vec![11, 21, 31, 101]
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn re_validate_does_not_change_counters_or_list() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// given
|
|
let pre_insert_voter_count =
|
|
(Nominators::<Test>::count() + Validators::<Test>::count()) as u32;
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Config>::VoterList::count(), pre_insert_voter_count);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Config>::VoterList::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), vec![11, 21, 31]);
|
|
|
|
// when account 11 re-validates
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), Default::default()));
|
|
|
|
// then counts don't change
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Config>::VoterList::count(), pre_insert_voter_count);
|
|
// and the list is the same
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Config>::VoterList::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), vec![11, 21, 31]);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn force_apply_min_commission_works() {
|
|
let prefs = |c| ValidatorPrefs { commission: Perbill::from_percent(c), blocked: false };
|
|
let validators = || Validators::<Test>::iter().collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(30), prefs(10)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(RuntimeOrigin::signed(20), prefs(5)));
|
|
|
|
// Given
|
|
assert_eq!(validators(), vec![(31, prefs(10)), (21, prefs(5)), (11, prefs(0))]);
|
|
MinCommission::<Test>::set(Perbill::from_percent(5));
|
|
|
|
// When applying to a commission greater than min
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::force_apply_min_commission(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1), 31));
|
|
// Then the commission is not changed
|
|
assert_eq!(validators(), vec![(31, prefs(10)), (21, prefs(5)), (11, prefs(0))]);
|
|
|
|
// When applying to a commission that is equal to min
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::force_apply_min_commission(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1), 21));
|
|
// Then the commission is not changed
|
|
assert_eq!(validators(), vec![(31, prefs(10)), (21, prefs(5)), (11, prefs(0))]);
|
|
|
|
// When applying to a commission that is less than the min
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::force_apply_min_commission(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1), 11));
|
|
// Then the commission is bumped to the min
|
|
assert_eq!(validators(), vec![(31, prefs(10)), (21, prefs(5)), (11, prefs(5))]);
|
|
|
|
// When applying commission to a validator that doesn't exist then storage is not altered
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::force_apply_min_commission(RuntimeOrigin::signed(1), 420),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotStash
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn proportional_slash_stop_slashing_if_remaining_zero() {
|
|
let c = |era, value| UnlockChunk::<Balance> { era, value };
|
|
// Given
|
|
let mut ledger = StakingLedger::<Test> {
|
|
stash: 123,
|
|
total: 40,
|
|
active: 20,
|
|
// we have some chunks, but they are not affected.
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![c(1, 10), c(2, 10)],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(BondingDuration::get(), 3);
|
|
|
|
// should not slash more than the amount requested, by accidentally slashing the first chunk.
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.slash(18, 1, 0), 18);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn proportional_ledger_slash_works() {
|
|
let c = |era, value| UnlockChunk::<Balance> { era, value };
|
|
// Given
|
|
let mut ledger = StakingLedger::<Test> {
|
|
stash: 123,
|
|
total: 10,
|
|
active: 10,
|
|
unlocking: bounded_vec![],
|
|
claimed_rewards: bounded_vec![],
|
|
};
|
|
assert_eq!(BondingDuration::get(), 3);
|
|
|
|
// When we slash a ledger with no unlocking chunks
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.slash(5, 1, 0), 5);
|
|
// Then
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.active, 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().0, 5);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().1, Default::default());
|
|
|
|
// When we slash a ledger with no unlocking chunks and the slash amount is greater then the
|
|
// total
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.slash(11, 1, 0), 5);
|
|
// Then
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.active, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().0, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().1, Default::default());
|
|
|
|
// Given
|
|
ledger.unlocking = bounded_vec![c(4, 10), c(5, 10)];
|
|
ledger.total = 2 * 10;
|
|
ledger.active = 0;
|
|
// When all the chunks overlap with the slash eras
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.slash(20, 0, 0), 20);
|
|
// Then
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.unlocking, vec![]);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().0, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().1, BTreeMap::from([(4, 0), (5, 0)]));
|
|
|
|
// Given
|
|
ledger.unlocking = bounded_vec![c(4, 100), c(5, 100), c(6, 100), c(7, 100)];
|
|
ledger.total = 4 * 100;
|
|
ledger.active = 0;
|
|
// When the first 2 chunks don't overlap with the affected range of unlock eras.
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.slash(140, 0, 3), 140);
|
|
// Then
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.unlocking, vec![c(4, 100), c(5, 100), c(6, 30), c(7, 30)]);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, 4 * 100 - 140);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().0, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().1, BTreeMap::from([(6, 30), (7, 30)]));
|
|
|
|
// Given
|
|
ledger.unlocking = bounded_vec![c(4, 100), c(5, 100), c(6, 100), c(7, 100)];
|
|
ledger.total = 4 * 100;
|
|
ledger.active = 0;
|
|
// When the first 2 chunks don't overlap with the affected range of unlock eras.
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.slash(15, 0, 3), 15);
|
|
// Then
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.unlocking, vec![c(4, 100), c(5, 100), c(6, 100 - 8), c(7, 100 - 7)]);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, 4 * 100 - 15);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().0, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().1, BTreeMap::from([(6, 92), (7, 93)]));
|
|
|
|
// Given
|
|
ledger.unlocking = bounded_vec![c(4, 40), c(5, 100), c(6, 10), c(7, 250)];
|
|
ledger.active = 500;
|
|
// 900
|
|
ledger.total = 40 + 10 + 100 + 250 + 500;
|
|
// When we have a partial slash that touches all chunks
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.slash(900 / 2, 0, 0), 450);
|
|
// Then
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.active, 500 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.unlocking, vec![c(4, 40 / 2), c(5, 100 / 2), c(6, 10 / 2), c(7, 250 / 2)]);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, 900 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().0, 500 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
LedgerSlashPerEra::get().1,
|
|
BTreeMap::from([(4, 40 / 2), (5, 100 / 2), (6, 10 / 2), (7, 250 / 2)])
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// slash 1/4th with not chunk.
|
|
ledger.unlocking = bounded_vec![];
|
|
ledger.active = 500;
|
|
ledger.total = 500;
|
|
// When we have a partial slash that touches all chunks
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.slash(500 / 4, 0, 0), 500 / 4);
|
|
// Then
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.active, 3 * 500 / 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.unlocking, vec![]);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, ledger.active);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().0, 3 * 500 / 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().1, Default::default());
|
|
|
|
// Given we have the same as above,
|
|
ledger.unlocking = bounded_vec![c(4, 40), c(5, 100), c(6, 10), c(7, 250)];
|
|
ledger.active = 500;
|
|
ledger.total = 40 + 10 + 100 + 250 + 500; // 900
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, 900);
|
|
// When we have a higher min balance
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
ledger.slash(
|
|
900 / 2,
|
|
25, /* min balance - chunks with era 0 & 2 will be slashed to <=25, causing it to
|
|
* get swept */
|
|
0
|
|
),
|
|
450
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.active, 500 / 2);
|
|
// the last chunk was not slashed 50% like all the rest, because some other earlier chunks got
|
|
// dusted.
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.unlocking, vec![c(5, 100 / 2), c(7, 150)]);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, 900 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().0, 500 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
LedgerSlashPerEra::get().1,
|
|
BTreeMap::from([(4, 0), (5, 100 / 2), (6, 0), (7, 150)])
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Given
|
|
// slash order --------------------NA--------2----------0----------1----
|
|
ledger.unlocking = bounded_vec![c(4, 40), c(5, 100), c(6, 10), c(7, 250)];
|
|
ledger.active = 500;
|
|
ledger.total = 40 + 10 + 100 + 250 + 500; // 900
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
ledger.slash(
|
|
500 + 10 + 250 + 100 / 2, // active + era 6 + era 7 + era 5 / 2
|
|
0,
|
|
3 /* slash era 6 first, so the affected parts are era 6, era 7 and
|
|
* ledge.active. This will cause the affected to go to zero, and then we will
|
|
* start slashing older chunks */
|
|
),
|
|
500 + 250 + 10 + 100 / 2
|
|
);
|
|
// Then
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.active, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.unlocking, vec![c(4, 40), c(5, 100 / 2)]);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, 90);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().0, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().1, BTreeMap::from([(5, 100 / 2), (6, 0), (7, 0)]));
|
|
|
|
// Given
|
|
// iteration order------------------NA---------2----------0----------1----
|
|
ledger.unlocking = bounded_vec![c(4, 100), c(5, 100), c(6, 100), c(7, 100)];
|
|
ledger.active = 100;
|
|
ledger.total = 5 * 100;
|
|
// When
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
ledger.slash(
|
|
351, // active + era 6 + era 7 + era 5 / 2 + 1
|
|
50, // min balance - everything slashed below 50 will get dusted
|
|
3 /* slash era 3+3 first, so the affected parts are era 6, era 7 and
|
|
* ledge.active. This will cause the affected to go to zero, and then we will
|
|
* start slashing older chunks */
|
|
),
|
|
400
|
|
);
|
|
// Then
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.active, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.unlocking, vec![c(4, 100)]);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, 100);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().0, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().1, BTreeMap::from([(5, 0), (6, 0), (7, 0)]));
|
|
|
|
// Tests for saturating arithmetic
|
|
|
|
// Given
|
|
let slash = u64::MAX as Balance * 2;
|
|
// The value of the other parts of ledger that will get slashed
|
|
let value = slash - (10 * 4);
|
|
|
|
ledger.active = 10;
|
|
ledger.unlocking = bounded_vec![c(4, 10), c(5, 10), c(6, 10), c(7, value)];
|
|
ledger.total = value + 40;
|
|
// When
|
|
let slash_amount = ledger.slash(slash, 0, 0);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(slash_amount, slash, 5);
|
|
// Then
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.active, 0); // slash of 9
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.unlocking, vec![]);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().0, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().1, BTreeMap::from([(4, 0), (5, 0), (6, 0), (7, 0)]));
|
|
|
|
// Given
|
|
use sp_runtime::PerThing as _;
|
|
let slash = u64::MAX as Balance * 2;
|
|
let value = u64::MAX as Balance * 2;
|
|
let unit = 100;
|
|
// slash * value that will saturate
|
|
assert!(slash.checked_mul(value).is_none());
|
|
// but slash * unit won't.
|
|
assert!(slash.checked_mul(unit).is_some());
|
|
ledger.unlocking = bounded_vec![c(4, unit), c(5, value), c(6, unit), c(7, unit)];
|
|
//--------------------------------------note value^^^
|
|
ledger.active = unit;
|
|
ledger.total = unit * 4 + value;
|
|
// When
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.slash(slash, 0, 0), slash);
|
|
// Then
|
|
// The amount slashed out of `unit`
|
|
let affected_balance = value + unit * 4;
|
|
let ratio =
|
|
Perquintill::from_rational_with_rounding(slash, affected_balance, Rounding::Up).unwrap();
|
|
// `unit` after the slash is applied
|
|
let unit_slashed = {
|
|
let unit_slash = ratio.mul_ceil(unit);
|
|
unit - unit_slash
|
|
};
|
|
let value_slashed = {
|
|
let value_slash = ratio.mul_ceil(value);
|
|
value - value_slash
|
|
};
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.active, unit_slashed);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.unlocking, vec![c(5, value_slashed), c(7, 32)]);
|
|
assert_eq!(ledger.total, value_slashed + 32);
|
|
assert_eq!(LedgerSlashPerEra::get().0, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
LedgerSlashPerEra::get().1,
|
|
BTreeMap::from([(4, 0), (5, value_slashed), (6, 0), (7, 32)])
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn pre_bonding_era_cannot_be_claimed() {
|
|
// Verifies initial conditions of mock
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let history_depth = HistoryDepth::get();
|
|
// jump to some era above history_depth
|
|
let mut current_era = history_depth + 10;
|
|
let last_reward_era = current_era - 1;
|
|
let start_reward_era = current_era - history_depth;
|
|
|
|
// put some money in stash=3 and controller=4.
|
|
for i in 3..5 {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&i, 2000);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mock::start_active_era(current_era);
|
|
|
|
// add a new candidate for being a validator. account 3 controlled by 4.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(3), 4, 1500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
let claimed_rewards: BoundedVec<_, _> =
|
|
(start_reward_era..=last_reward_era).collect::<Vec<_>>().try_into().unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&4).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 3,
|
|
total: 1500,
|
|
active: 1500,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards,
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// start next era
|
|
current_era = current_era + 1;
|
|
mock::start_active_era(current_era);
|
|
|
|
// claiming reward for last era in which validator was active works
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 3, current_era - 1));
|
|
|
|
// consumed weight for all payout_stakers dispatches that fail
|
|
let err_weight = <Test as Config>::WeightInfo::payout_stakers_alive_staked(0);
|
|
// cannot claim rewards for an era before bonding occured as it is
|
|
// already marked as claimed.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 3, current_era - 2),
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyClaimed.with_weight(err_weight)
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// decoding will fail now since Staking Ledger is in corrupt state
|
|
HistoryDepth::set(history_depth - 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&4), None);
|
|
|
|
// make sure stakers still cannot claim rewards that they are not meant to
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 3, current_era - 2),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotController
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// fix the corrupted state for post conditions check
|
|
HistoryDepth::set(history_depth);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reducing_history_depth_abrupt() {
|
|
// Verifies initial conditions of mock
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
let original_history_depth = HistoryDepth::get();
|
|
let mut current_era = original_history_depth + 10;
|
|
let last_reward_era = current_era - 1;
|
|
let start_reward_era = current_era - original_history_depth;
|
|
|
|
// put some money in (stash, controller)=(3,4),(5,6).
|
|
for i in 3..7 {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&i, 2000);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// start current era
|
|
mock::start_active_era(current_era);
|
|
|
|
// add a new candidate for being a staker. account 3 controlled by 4.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(3), 4, 1500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// all previous era before the bonding action should be marked as
|
|
// claimed.
|
|
let claimed_rewards: BoundedVec<_, _> =
|
|
(start_reward_era..=last_reward_era).collect::<Vec<_>>().try_into().unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&4).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 3,
|
|
total: 1500,
|
|
active: 1500,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards,
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// next era
|
|
current_era = current_era + 1;
|
|
mock::start_active_era(current_era);
|
|
|
|
// claiming reward for last era in which validator was active works
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 3, current_era - 1));
|
|
|
|
// next era
|
|
current_era = current_era + 1;
|
|
mock::start_active_era(current_era);
|
|
|
|
// history_depth reduced without migration
|
|
let history_depth = original_history_depth - 1;
|
|
HistoryDepth::set(history_depth);
|
|
// claiming reward does not work anymore
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::payout_stakers(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 3, current_era - 1),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotController
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// new stakers can still bond
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(5), 6, 1200, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// new staking ledgers created will be bounded by the current history depth
|
|
let last_reward_era = current_era - 1;
|
|
let start_reward_era = current_era - history_depth;
|
|
let claimed_rewards: BoundedVec<_, _> =
|
|
(start_reward_era..=last_reward_era).collect::<Vec<_>>().try_into().unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&6).unwrap(),
|
|
StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 5,
|
|
total: 1200,
|
|
active: 1200,
|
|
unlocking: Default::default(),
|
|
claimed_rewards,
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// fix the corrupted state for post conditions check
|
|
HistoryDepth::set(original_history_depth);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reducing_max_unlocking_chunks_abrupt() {
|
|
// Concern is on validators only
|
|
// By Default 11, 10 are stash and ctrl and 21,20
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// given a staker at era=10 and MaxUnlockChunks set to 2
|
|
MaxUnlockingChunks::set(2);
|
|
start_active_era(10);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(3), 4, 300, RewardDestination::Staked));
|
|
assert!(matches!(Staking::ledger(4), Some(_)));
|
|
|
|
// when staker unbonds
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 20));
|
|
|
|
// then an unlocking chunk is added at `current_era + bonding_duration`
|
|
// => 10 + 3 = 13
|
|
let expected_unlocking: BoundedVec<UnlockChunk<Balance>, MaxUnlockingChunks> =
|
|
bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 20 as Balance, era: 13 as EraIndex }];
|
|
assert!(matches!(Staking::ledger(4),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
unlocking,
|
|
..
|
|
}) if unlocking==expected_unlocking));
|
|
|
|
// when staker unbonds at next era
|
|
start_active_era(11);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 50));
|
|
// then another unlock chunk is added
|
|
let expected_unlocking: BoundedVec<UnlockChunk<Balance>, MaxUnlockingChunks> =
|
|
bounded_vec![UnlockChunk { value: 20, era: 13 }, UnlockChunk { value: 50, era: 14 }];
|
|
assert!(matches!(Staking::ledger(4),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
unlocking,
|
|
..
|
|
}) if unlocking==expected_unlocking));
|
|
|
|
// when staker unbonds further
|
|
start_active_era(12);
|
|
// then further unbonding not possible
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 20), Error::<Test>::NoMoreChunks);
|
|
|
|
// when max unlocking chunks is reduced abruptly to a low value
|
|
MaxUnlockingChunks::set(1);
|
|
// then unbond, rebond ops are blocked with ledger in corrupt state
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 20), Error::<Test>::NotController);
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::rebond(RuntimeOrigin::signed(4), 100), Error::<Test>::NotController);
|
|
|
|
// reset the ledger corruption
|
|
MaxUnlockingChunks::set(2);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_set_unsupported_validator_count() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
MaxWinners::set(50);
|
|
// set validator count works
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_validator_count(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 30));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_validator_count(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 50));
|
|
// setting validator count above 100 does not work
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::set_validator_count(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 51),
|
|
Error::<Test>::TooManyValidators,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn increase_validator_count_errors() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
MaxWinners::set(50);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_validator_count(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 40));
|
|
|
|
// increase works
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::increase_validator_count(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 6));
|
|
assert_eq!(ValidatorCount::<Test>::get(), 46);
|
|
|
|
// errors
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::increase_validator_count(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 5),
|
|
Error::<Test>::TooManyValidators,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn scale_validator_count_errors() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
MaxWinners::set(50);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_validator_count(RuntimeOrigin::root(), 20));
|
|
|
|
// scale value works
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::scale_validator_count(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::root(),
|
|
Percent::from_percent(200)
|
|
));
|
|
assert_eq!(ValidatorCount::<Test>::get(), 40);
|
|
|
|
// errors
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::scale_validator_count(RuntimeOrigin::root(), Percent::from_percent(126)),
|
|
Error::<Test>::TooManyValidators,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn set_min_commission_works_with_admin_origin() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// no minimum commission set initially
|
|
assert_eq!(MinCommission::<Test>::get(), Zero::zero());
|
|
|
|
// root can set min commission
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_min_commission(RuntimeOrigin::root(), Perbill::from_percent(10)));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(MinCommission::<Test>::get(), Perbill::from_percent(10));
|
|
|
|
// Non privileged origin can not set min_commission
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::set_min_commission(RuntimeOrigin::signed(2), Perbill::from_percent(15)),
|
|
BadOrigin
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Admin Origin can set min commission
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_min_commission(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(1),
|
|
Perbill::from_percent(15),
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// setting commission below min_commission fails
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(10),
|
|
ValidatorPrefs { commission: Perbill::from_percent(14), blocked: false }
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::CommissionTooLow
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// setting commission >= min_commission works
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(10),
|
|
ValidatorPrefs { commission: Perbill::from_percent(15), blocked: false }
|
|
));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mod staking_interface {
|
|
use frame_support::storage::with_storage_layer;
|
|
use sp_staking::StakingInterface;
|
|
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn force_unstake_with_slash_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
// without slash
|
|
let _ = with_storage_layer::<(), _, _>(|| {
|
|
// bond an account, can unstake
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
assert_ok!(<Staking as StakingInterface>::force_unstake(11));
|
|
Err(DispatchError::from("revert"))
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// bond again and add a slash, still can unstake.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
add_slash(&11);
|
|
assert_ok!(<Staking as StakingInterface>::force_unstake(11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn do_withdraw_unbonded_with_wrong_slash_spans_works_as_expected() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::eras_stakers(active_era(), 11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(100)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::withdraw_unbonded(RuntimeOrigin::signed(10), 0),
|
|
Error::<Test>::IncorrectSlashingSpans
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let num_slashing_spans = Staking::slashing_spans(&11).map_or(0, |s| s.iter().count());
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(
|
|
RuntimeOrigin::signed(10),
|
|
num_slashing_spans as u32
|
|
));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|