mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-05-07 06:08:03 +00:00
d52d8692f9
* Initially scoping out of the problem * Remove need for exiry in balance locks. * Remove expiry from locks. * Remove supefluous balance test * Amalgamate pieces of balance module * Split out vesting * Fix tests * Fixes for vesting. * Docs. * Weight docs. * Refactor things in terms of set_balances. * Switch out ED to be free + reserved. * Remove on_free_balance_zero and some docs. * Build fixes * Update frame/vesting/src/lib.rs Co-Authored-By: Xiliang Chen <xlchen1291@gmail.com> * Update frame/vesting/src/lib.rs Co-Authored-By: Xiliang Chen <xlchen1291@gmail.com> * Migration * Remove superfluous code. * Test fixes * Fix some tests * Fix repatriate reserve * Fixes * Add test for migration * Final cleanups * Fix * Indentation. * Undo unneeded referencing * Bump runtime version * Fixes Co-authored-by: Xiliang Chen <xlchen1291@gmail.com>
2806 lines
83 KiB
Rust
2806 lines
83 KiB
Rust
// Copyright 2017-2020 Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
|
|
// This file is part of Substrate.
|
|
|
|
// Substrate is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
|
|
// (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
// Substrate is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
// GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
// along with Substrate. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
|
|
|
//! Tests for the module.
|
|
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
use mock::*;
|
|
use codec::Encode;
|
|
use sp_runtime::{assert_eq_error_rate, traits::{OnInitialize, BadOrigin}};
|
|
use sp_staking::offence::OffenceDetails;
|
|
use frame_support::{
|
|
assert_ok, assert_noop,
|
|
traits::{Currency, ReservableCurrency},
|
|
dispatch::DispatchError, StorageMap,
|
|
};
|
|
use substrate_test_utils::assert_eq_uvec;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn force_unstake_works() {
|
|
// Verifies initial conditions of mock
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Account 11 is stashed and locked, and account 10 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Cant transfer
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 1, 10),
|
|
DispatchError::Module {
|
|
index: 0,
|
|
error: 1,
|
|
message: Some("LiquidityRestrictions"),
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
// Force unstake requires root.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::force_unstake(Origin::signed(11), 11), BadOrigin);
|
|
// We now force them to unstake
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::force_unstake(Origin::ROOT, 11));
|
|
// No longer bonded.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), None);
|
|
// Transfer works.
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 1, 10));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn basic_setup_works() {
|
|
// Verifies initial conditions of mock
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Account 11 is stashed and locked, and account 10 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Account 21 is stashed and locked, and account 20 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&21), Some(20));
|
|
// Account 1 is not a stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&1), None);
|
|
|
|
// Account 10 controls the stash from account 11, which is 100 * balance_factor units
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger { stash: 11, total: 1000, active: 1000, unlocking: vec![] })
|
|
);
|
|
// Account 20 controls the stash from account 21, which is 200 * balance_factor units
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&20),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger { stash: 21, total: 1000, active: 1000, unlocking: vec![] })
|
|
);
|
|
// Account 1 does not control any stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&1), None);
|
|
|
|
// ValidatorPrefs are default
|
|
assert_eq!(<Validators<Test>>::enumerate().collect::<Vec<_>>(), vec![
|
|
(31, ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
(21, ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
(11, ValidatorPrefs::default())
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(100),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger { stash: 101, total: 500, active: 500, unlocking: vec![] })
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101).unwrap().targets, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::stakers(11),
|
|
Exposure { total: 1125, own: 1000, others: vec![ IndividualExposure { who: 101, value: 125 }] }
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::stakers(21),
|
|
Exposure { total: 1375, own: 1000, others: vec![ IndividualExposure { who: 101, value: 375 }] }
|
|
);
|
|
// initial slot_stake
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), 1125);
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The number of validators required.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Initial Era and session
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Account 10 has `balance_factor` free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// New era is not being forced
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
|
|
// All exposures must be correct.
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
check_nominator_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn change_controller_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::enumerate().map(|(c, _)| c).collect::<Vec<u64>>().contains(&11));
|
|
// 10 can control 11 who is initially a validator.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10)));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::enumerate().map(|(c, _)| c).collect::<Vec<u64>>().contains(&11));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_controller(Origin::signed(11), 5));
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(10), ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NotController,
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(5), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rewards_should_work() {
|
|
// should check that:
|
|
// * rewards get recorded per session
|
|
// * rewards get paid per Era
|
|
// * Check that nominators are also rewarded
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Init some balances
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&2, 500);
|
|
|
|
let delay = 1000;
|
|
let init_balance_2 = Balances::total_balance(&2);
|
|
let init_balance_10 = Balances::total_balance(&10);
|
|
let init_balance_11 = Balances::total_balance(&11);
|
|
|
|
// Set payee to controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Initial config should be correct
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Add a dummy nominator.
|
|
//
|
|
// Equal division indicates that the reward will be equally divided among validator and
|
|
// nominator.
|
|
<Stakers<Test>>::insert(&11, Exposure {
|
|
own: 500,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![IndividualExposure {who: 2, value: 500 }]
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&2, RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(2), RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(11), RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
let mut block = 3; // Block 3 => Session 1 => Era 0
|
|
System::set_block_number(block);
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(block * 5000); // on time.
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 50)]);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 50)]);
|
|
// This is the second validator of the current elected set.
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 50)]);
|
|
// This must be no-op as it is not an elected validator.
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(1001, 10_000)]);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout = current_total_payout_for_duration(9 * 5 * 1000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout > 10); // Test is meaningful if reward something
|
|
|
|
// No reward yet
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), init_balance_2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), init_balance_10);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), init_balance_11);
|
|
|
|
block = 6; // Block 6 => Session 2 => Era 0
|
|
System::set_block_number(block);
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(block * 5000 + delay); // a little late.
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 2);
|
|
|
|
block = 9; // Block 9 => Session 3 => Era 1
|
|
System::set_block_number(block);
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(block * 5000); // back to being on time. no delays
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
|
|
// 11 validator has 2/3 of the total rewards and half half for it and its nominator
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&2), init_balance_2 + total_payout / 3, 1);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Balances::total_balance(&10), init_balance_10 + total_payout / 3, 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), init_balance_11);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn multi_era_reward_should_work() {
|
|
// Should check that:
|
|
// The value of current_session_reward is set at the end of each era, based on
|
|
// slot_stake and session_reward.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let init_balance_10 = Balances::total_balance(&10);
|
|
|
|
// Set payee to controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Compute now as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 10); // Test is meaningfull if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
start_session(0);
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), init_balance_10 + total_payout_0);
|
|
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 > 10); // Test is meaningfull if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 101)]);
|
|
|
|
// new era is triggered here.
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
|
|
// pay time
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), init_balance_10 + total_payout_0 + total_payout_1);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn staking_should_work() {
|
|
// should test:
|
|
// * new validators can be added to the default set
|
|
// * new ones will be chosen per era
|
|
// * either one can unlock the stash and back-down from being a validator via `chill`ing.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.fair(false) // to give 20 more staked value
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(1); // Initialize time.
|
|
|
|
// remember + compare this along with the test.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..5 { let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&i, 2000); }
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 1:
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
// add a new candidate for being a validator. account 3 controlled by 4.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 1500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(4), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
// No effects will be seen so far.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 2:
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
|
|
// No effects will be seen so far. Era has not been yet triggered.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 3: the validators will now be queued.
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 4: the validators will now be changed.
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 4]);
|
|
// --- Block 4: Unstake 4 as a validator, freeing up the balance stashed in 3
|
|
// 4 will chill
|
|
Staking::chill(Origin::signed(4)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 5: nothing. 4 is still there.
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 4]);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 6: 4 will not be a validator.
|
|
start_session(7);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// Note: the stashed value of 4 is still lock
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&4),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger { stash: 3, total: 1500, active: 1500, unlocking: vec![] })
|
|
);
|
|
// e.g. it cannot spend more than 500 that it has free from the total 2000
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::reserve(&3, 501),
|
|
DispatchError::Module {
|
|
index: 0,
|
|
error: 1,
|
|
message: Some("LiquidityRestrictions"),
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&3, 409));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn less_than_needed_candidates_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.num_validators(3)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::minimum_validator_count(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![30, 20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Previous set is selected. NO election algorithm is even executed.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![30, 20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// But the exposure is updated in a simple way. No external votes exists.
|
|
// This is purely self-vote.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(10).others.len(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(20).others.len(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(30).others.len(), 0);
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
check_nominator_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn no_candidate_emergency_condition() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(15)
|
|
.num_validators(4)
|
|
.validator_pool(true)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// initial validators
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![10, 20, 30, 40]);
|
|
let prefs = ValidatorPrefs { commission: Perbill::one() };
|
|
<Staking as crate::Store>::Validators::insert(11, prefs.clone());
|
|
|
|
// set the minimum validator count.
|
|
<Staking as crate::Store>::MinimumValidatorCount::put(10);
|
|
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
|
|
// trigger era
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Previous ones are elected. chill is invalidates. TODO: #2494
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![10, 20, 30, 40]);
|
|
// Though the validator preferences has been removed.
|
|
assert!(Staking::validators(11) != prefs);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn nominating_and_rewards_should_work() {
|
|
// PHRAGMEN OUTPUT: running this test with the reference impl gives:
|
|
//
|
|
// Sequential Phragmén gives
|
|
// 10 is elected with stake 2200.0 and score 0.0003333333333333333
|
|
// 20 is elected with stake 1800.0 and score 0.0005555555555555556
|
|
|
|
// 10 has load 0.0003333333333333333 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 20 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 20 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 30 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 30 with stake 0
|
|
// 40 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 40 with stake 0
|
|
// 2 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 600.0 20 with stake 400.0 30 with stake 0.0
|
|
// 4 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 600.0 20 with stake 400.0 40 with stake 0.0
|
|
|
|
// Sequential Phragmén with post processing gives
|
|
// 10 is elected with stake 2000.0 and score 0.0003333333333333333
|
|
// 20 is elected with stake 2000.0 and score 0.0005555555555555556
|
|
|
|
// 10 has load 0.0003333333333333333 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 20 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 20 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 30 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 30 with stake 0
|
|
// 40 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 40 with stake 0
|
|
// 2 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 400.0 20 with stake 600.0 30 with stake 0
|
|
// 4 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 600.0 20 with stake 400.0 40 with stake 0.0
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.validator_pool(true)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// initial validators -- everyone is actually even.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![40, 30]);
|
|
|
|
// Set payee to controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(20), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(30), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(40), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// give the man some money
|
|
let initial_balance = 1000;
|
|
for i in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 20, 21].iter() {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(i, initial_balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// bond two account pairs and state interest in nomination.
|
|
// 2 will nominate for 10, 20, 30
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![11, 21, 31]));
|
|
// 4 will nominate for 10, 20, 40
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![11, 21, 41]));
|
|
|
|
// the total reward for era 0
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 100); // Test is meaningfull if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(41, 1)]);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(31, 1)]);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 10)]); // must be no-op
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 10)]); // must be no-op
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// 10 and 20 have more votes, they will be chosen by phragmen.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// OLD validators must have already received some rewards.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&40), 1 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&30), 1 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
|
|
// ------ check the staked value of all parties.
|
|
|
|
// total expo of 10, with 1200 coming from nominators (externals), according to phragmen.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11).own, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11).total, 1000 + 800);
|
|
// 2 and 4 supported 10, each with stake 600, according to phragmen.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::stakers(11).others.iter().map(|e| e.value).collect::<Vec<BalanceOf<Test>>>(),
|
|
vec![400, 400]
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::stakers(11).others.iter().map(|e| e.who).collect::<Vec<u64>>(),
|
|
vec![3, 1]
|
|
);
|
|
// total expo of 20, with 500 coming from nominators (externals), according to phragmen.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(21).own, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(Staking::stakers(21).total, 1000 + 1200, 2);
|
|
// 2 and 4 supported 20, each with stake 250, according to phragmen.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::stakers(21).others.iter().map(|e| e.value).collect::<Vec<BalanceOf<Test>>>(),
|
|
vec![600, 600]
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::stakers(21).others.iter().map(|e| e.who).collect::<Vec<u64>>(),
|
|
vec![3, 1]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// They are not chosen anymore
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(31).total, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(41).total, 0);
|
|
|
|
// the total reward for era 1
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 > 100); // Test is meaningfull if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(41, 10)]); // must be no-op
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(31, 10)]); // must be no-op
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 2)]);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// nothing else will happen, era ends and rewards are paid again,
|
|
// it is expected that nominators will also be paid. See below
|
|
|
|
let payout_for_10 = total_payout_1 / 3;
|
|
let payout_for_20 = 2 * total_payout_1 / 3;
|
|
// Nominator 2: has [400/1800 ~ 2/9 from 10] + [600/2200 ~ 3/11 from 20]'s reward. ==> 2/9 + 3/11
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&2),
|
|
initial_balance + (2 * payout_for_10 / 9 + 3 * payout_for_20 / 11),
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
// Nominator 4: has [400/1800 ~ 2/9 from 10] + [600/2200 ~ 3/11 from 20]'s reward. ==> 2/9 + 3/11
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&4),
|
|
initial_balance + (2 * payout_for_10 / 9 + 3 * payout_for_20 / 11),
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Validator 10: got 800 / 1800 external stake => 8/18 =? 4/9 => Validator's share = 5/9
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&10),
|
|
initial_balance + 5 * payout_for_10 / 9,
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
// Validator 20: got 1200 / 2200 external stake => 12/22 =? 6/11 => Validator's share = 5/11
|
|
assert_eq_error_rate!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&20),
|
|
initial_balance + 5 * payout_for_20 / 11,
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
check_nominator_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn nominators_also_get_slashed() {
|
|
// A nominator should be slashed if the validator they nominated is slashed
|
|
// Here is the breakdown of roles:
|
|
// 10 - is the controller of 11
|
|
// 11 - is the stash.
|
|
// 2 - is the nominator of 20, 10
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Set payee to controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// give the man some money.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1000;
|
|
for i in [1, 2, 3, 10].iter() {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(i, initial_balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 2 will nominate for 10, 20
|
|
let nominator_stake = 500;
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, nominator_stake, RewardDestination::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![20, 10]));
|
|
|
|
let total_payout = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout > 100); // Test is meaningfull if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// new era, pay rewards,
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Nominator stash didn't collect any.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), initial_balance);
|
|
|
|
// 10 goes offline
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::stakers(&11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(5)],
|
|
);
|
|
let expo = Staking::stakers(11);
|
|
let slash_value = 50;
|
|
let total_slash = expo.total.min(slash_value);
|
|
let validator_slash = expo.own.min(total_slash);
|
|
let nominator_slash = nominator_stake.min(total_slash - validator_slash);
|
|
|
|
// initial + first era reward + slash
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), initial_balance - validator_slash);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), initial_balance - nominator_slash);
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
check_nominator_all();
|
|
// Because slashing happened.
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(10));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn double_staking_should_fail() {
|
|
// should test (in the same order):
|
|
// * an account already bonded as stash cannot be be stashed again.
|
|
// * an account already bonded as stash cannot nominate.
|
|
// * an account already bonded as controller can nominate.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let arbitrary_value = 5;
|
|
// 2 = controller, 1 stashed => ok
|
|
assert_ok!(
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, arbitrary_value,
|
|
RewardDestination::default())
|
|
);
|
|
// 4 = not used so far, 1 stashed => not allowed.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 4, arbitrary_value,
|
|
RewardDestination::default()), Error::<Test>::AlreadyBonded,
|
|
);
|
|
// 1 = stashed => attempting to nominate should fail.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(1), vec![1]), Error::<Test>::NotController);
|
|
// 2 = controller => nominating should work.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![1]));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn double_controlling_should_fail() {
|
|
// should test (in the same order):
|
|
// * an account already bonded as controller CANNOT be reused as the controller of another account.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let arbitrary_value = 5;
|
|
// 2 = controller, 1 stashed => ok
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(
|
|
Origin::signed(1),
|
|
2,
|
|
arbitrary_value,
|
|
RewardDestination::default(),
|
|
));
|
|
// 2 = controller, 3 stashed (Note that 2 is reused.) => no-op
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 2, arbitrary_value, RewardDestination::default()),
|
|
Error::<Test>::AlreadyPaired,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn session_and_eras_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Block 1: No change.
|
|
start_session(0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Block 2: Simple era change.
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Block 3: Schedule an era length change; no visible changes.
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Block 4: Era change kicks in.
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Block 5: No change.
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 7);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Block 6: No change.
|
|
start_session(7);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 8);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Block 7: Era increment.
|
|
start_session(8);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 9);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 3);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn forcing_new_era_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// normal flow of session.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
start_session(0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// no era change.
|
|
ForceEra::put(Forcing::ForceNone);
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// back to normal.
|
|
// this immediately starts a new session.
|
|
ForceEra::put(Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
start_session(7);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 2);
|
|
start_session(8);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// forceful change
|
|
ForceEra::put(Forcing::ForceAlways);
|
|
start_session(9);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 3);
|
|
start_session(10);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 4);
|
|
start_session(11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 5);
|
|
|
|
// just one forceful change
|
|
ForceEra::put(Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
start_session(12);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 6);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(ForceEra::get(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
start_session(13);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 6);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_transfer_staked_balance() {
|
|
// Tests that a stash account cannot transfer funds
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 11 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Confirm account 11 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 (via controller 10) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11).total, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 cannot transfer as a result
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 20, 1),
|
|
DispatchError::Module {
|
|
index: 0,
|
|
error: 1,
|
|
message: Some("LiquidityRestrictions"),
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 extra free balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 10000);
|
|
// Confirm that account 11 can now transfer some balance
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 20, 1));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_transfer_staked_balance_2() {
|
|
// Tests that a stash account cannot transfer funds
|
|
// Same test as above but with 20, and more accurate.
|
|
// 21 has 2000 free balance but 1000 at stake
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).fair(true).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 21 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&21), Some(20));
|
|
// Confirm account 21 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
// Confirm account 21 (via controller 20) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&21).total, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 21 can transfer at most 1000
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(21), 20, 1001),
|
|
DispatchError::Module {
|
|
index: 0,
|
|
error: 1,
|
|
message: Some("LiquidityRestrictions"),
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(21), 20, 1000));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_reserve_staked_balance() {
|
|
// Checks that a bonded account cannot reserve balance from free balance
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 11 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Confirm account 11 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 (via controller 10) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11).own, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 cannot transfer as a result
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Balances::reserve(&11, 1),
|
|
DispatchError::Module {
|
|
index: 0,
|
|
error: 1,
|
|
message: Some("LiquidityRestrictions"),
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 extra free balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 10000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 can now reserve balance
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&11, 1));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_destination_works() {
|
|
// Rewards go to the correct destination as determined in Payee
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Check that account 11 is a validator
|
|
assert!(Staking::current_elected().contains(&11));
|
|
// Check the balance of the validator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// Check how much is at stake
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 100); // Test is meaningfull if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Staked (default)
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Staked);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the stash account of validator
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000 + total_payout_0);
|
|
// Check that amount at stake increased accordingly
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
active: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
//Change RewardDestination to Stash
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 > 100); // Test is meaningfull if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000 + total_payout_0 + total_payout_1);
|
|
// Record this value
|
|
let recorded_stash_balance = 1000 + total_payout_0 + total_payout_1;
|
|
// Check that amount at stake is NOT increased
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
active: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Change RewardDestination to Controller
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
// Check controller balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_2 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_2 > 100); // Test is meaningfull if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the controller account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 1 + total_payout_2);
|
|
// Check that amount at stake is NOT increased
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
active: 1000 + total_payout_0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
// Check that amount in staked account is NOT increased.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), recorded_stash_balance);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn validator_payment_prefs_work() {
|
|
// Test that validator preferences are correctly honored
|
|
// Note: unstake threshold is being directly tested in slashing tests.
|
|
// This test will focus on validator payment.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Initial config
|
|
let stash_initial_balance = Balances::total_balance(&11);
|
|
|
|
// check the balance of a validator accounts.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
// check the balance of a validator's stash accounts.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), stash_initial_balance);
|
|
// and the nominator (to-be)
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&2, 500);
|
|
|
|
// add a dummy nominator.
|
|
<Stakers<Test>>::insert(&11, Exposure {
|
|
own: 500, // equal division indicates that the reward will be equally divided among validator and nominator.
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![IndividualExposure {who: 2, value: 500 }]
|
|
});
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&2, RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::insert(&11, ValidatorPrefs {
|
|
commission: Perbill::from_percent(50),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 100); // Test is meaningfull if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// whats left to be shared is the sum of 3 rounds minus the validator's cut.
|
|
let shared_cut = total_payout_0 / 2;
|
|
// Validator's payee is Staked account, 11, reward will be paid here.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), stash_initial_balance + shared_cut / 2 + shared_cut);
|
|
// Controller account will not get any reward.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
// Rest of the reward will be shared and paid to the nominator in stake.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 500 + shared_cut / 2);
|
|
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
check_nominator_all();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_extra_works() {
|
|
// Tests that extra `free_balance` in the stash can be added to stake
|
|
// NOTE: this tests only verifies `StakingLedger` for correct updates
|
|
// See `bond_extra_and_withdraw_unbonded_works` for more details and updates on `Exposure`.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Check that account 10 is a validator
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(11));
|
|
// Check that account 10 is bonded to account 11
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Check how much is at stake
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// Call the bond_extra function from controller, add only 100
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(11), 100));
|
|
// There should be 100 more `total` and `active` in the ledger
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Call the bond_extra function with a large number, should handle it
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(11), u64::max_value()));
|
|
// The full amount of the funds should now be in the total and active
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000000,
|
|
active: 1000000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_extra_and_withdraw_unbonded_works() {
|
|
// * Should test
|
|
// * Given an account being bonded [and chosen as a validator](not mandatory)
|
|
// * It can add extra funds to the bonded account.
|
|
// * it can unbond a portion of its funds from the stash account.
|
|
// * Once the unbonding period is done, it can actually take the funds out of the stash.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// Initial config should be correct
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// check the balance of a validator accounts.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11), Exposure { total: 1000, own: 1000, others: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// deposit the extra 100 units
|
|
Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(11), 100).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
// Exposure is a snapshot! only updated after the next era update.
|
|
assert_ne!(Staking::stakers(&11), Exposure { total: 1000 + 100, own: 1000 + 100, others: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(10);
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// ledger should be the same.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
// Exposure is now updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11), Exposure { total: 1000 + 100, own: 1000 + 100, others: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1000).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11, total: 1000 + 100, active: 100, unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk{ value: 1000, era: 2 + 3}] })
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Attempting to free the balances now will fail. 2 eras need to pass.
|
|
Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10)).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11, total: 1000 + 100, active: 100, unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk{ value: 1000, era: 2 + 3}] }));
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// nothing yet
|
|
Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10)).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11, total: 1000 + 100, active: 100, unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk{ value: 1000, era: 2 + 3}] }));
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
start_era(5);
|
|
|
|
Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10)).unwrap();
|
|
// Now the value is free and the staking ledger is updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11, total: 100, active: 100, unlocking: vec![] }));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn too_many_unbond_calls_should_not_work() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// locked at era 0 until 3
|
|
for _ in 0..MAX_UNLOCKING_CHUNKS-1 {
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// locked at era 1 until 4
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
// can't do more.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1), Error::<Test>::NoMoreChunks);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1), Error::<Test>::NoMoreChunks);
|
|
// free up.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10)));
|
|
|
|
// Can add again.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10).unwrap().unlocking.len(), 2);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rebond_works() {
|
|
// * Should test
|
|
// * Given an account being bonded [and chosen as a validator](not mandatory)
|
|
// * it can unbond a portion of its funds from the stash account.
|
|
// * it can re-bond a portion of the funds scheduled to unlock.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Try to rebond some funds. We get an error since no fund is unbonded.
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 500),
|
|
Error::<Test>::NoUnlockChunk,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk {
|
|
value: 900,
|
|
era: 2 + 3
|
|
},]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond all the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 900).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 900, era: 5 }],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond part of the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 500).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 600,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 5 }],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond the remainder of the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 500).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond parts of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 5 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 5 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 5 },
|
|
]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond part of the funds unbonded.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 500).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 600,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 5 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 100, era: 5 },
|
|
]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rebond_is_fifo() {
|
|
// Rebond should proceed by reversing the most recent bond operations.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(
|
|
Origin::signed(10),
|
|
RewardDestination::Controller
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond some of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 400).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 600,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond more of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 300).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 300,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 3 + 3 },
|
|
]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
start_era(4);
|
|
|
|
// Unbond yet more of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 200).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 300, era: 3 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 200, era: 4 + 3 },
|
|
]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Re-bond half of the unbonding funds.
|
|
Staking::rebond(Origin::signed(10), 400).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(&10),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 500,
|
|
unlocking: vec![
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 400, era: 2 + 3 },
|
|
UnlockChunk { value: 100, era: 3 + 3 },
|
|
]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slot_stake_is_least_staked_validator_and_exposure_defines_maximum_punishment() {
|
|
// Test that slot_stake is determined by the least staked validator
|
|
// Test that slot_stake is the maximum punishment that can happen to a validator
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).fair(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Confirm validator count is 2
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
// Confirm account 10 and 20 are validators
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11) && <Validators<Test>>::exists(&21));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11).total, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&21).total, 2000);
|
|
|
|
// Give the man some money.
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&10, 1000);
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&20, 1000);
|
|
|
|
// We confirm initialized slot_stake is this value
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), Staking::stakers(&11).total);
|
|
|
|
// Now lets lower account 20 stake
|
|
<Stakers<Test>>::insert(&21, Exposure { total: 69, own: 69, others: vec![] });
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&21).total, 69);
|
|
<Ledger<Test>>::insert(&20, StakingLedger { stash: 22, total: 69, active: 69, unlocking: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// Compute total payout now for whole duration as other parameter won't change
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 100); // Test is meaningfull if reward something
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(11, 1)]);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![(21, 1)]);
|
|
|
|
// New era --> rewards are paid --> stakes are changed
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// -- new balances + reward
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11).total, 1000 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&21).total, 69 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
|
|
let _11_balance = Balances::free_balance(&11);
|
|
assert_eq!(_11_balance, 1000 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
|
|
// -- slot stake should also be updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), 69 + total_payout_0 / 2);
|
|
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
check_nominator_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn on_free_balance_zero_stash_removes_validator() {
|
|
// Tests that validator storage items are cleaned up when stash is empty
|
|
// Tests that storage items are untouched when controller is empty
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().existential_deposit(10).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Check the balance of the validator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 256);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 256000);
|
|
// Check these two accounts are bonded
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// Set some storage items which we expect to be cleaned up
|
|
// Set payee information
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Stash));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items that should be cleaned up
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::exists(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of controller to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&10, u64::max_value());
|
|
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account has not been touched
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 256000);
|
|
// Check these two accounts are still bonded
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items have not changed
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::exists(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of stash to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&11, u64::max_value());
|
|
// Check total balance of stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items do not exist
|
|
assert!(!<Ledger<Test>>::exists(&10));
|
|
assert!(!<Bonded<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Nominators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Payee<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn on_free_balance_zero_stash_removes_nominator() {
|
|
// Tests that nominator storage items are cleaned up when stash is empty
|
|
// Tests that storage items are untouched when controller is empty
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().existential_deposit(10).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Make 10 a nominator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(10), vec![20]));
|
|
// Check that account 10 is a nominator
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::exists(11));
|
|
// Check the balance of the nominator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), 256);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 256000);
|
|
|
|
// Set payee information
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Stash));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items that should be cleaned up
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::exists(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of controller to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&10, u64::max_value());
|
|
// Check total balance of account 10
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account has not been touched
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 256000);
|
|
// Check these two accounts are still bonded
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items have not changed
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::exists(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of stash to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&11, u64::max_value());
|
|
// Check total balance of stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items do not exist
|
|
assert!(!<Ledger<Test>>::exists(&10));
|
|
assert!(!<Bonded<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Nominators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Payee<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn switching_roles() {
|
|
// Test that it should be possible to switch between roles (nominator, validator, idle) with minimal overhead.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(1); // Initialize time.
|
|
|
|
// Reset reward destination
|
|
for i in &[10, 20] { assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(*i), RewardDestination::Controller)); }
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..7 { let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&i, 5000); }
|
|
|
|
// add 2 nominators
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 2000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![11, 5]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![21, 1]));
|
|
|
|
// add a new validator candidate
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(5), 6, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(6), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
// new block
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
|
|
// no change
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// new block
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
|
|
// no change
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// new block --> ne era --> new validators
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
|
|
// with current nominators 10 and 5 have the most stake
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![6, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// 2 decides to be a validator. Consequences:
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(2), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
// new stakes:
|
|
// 10: 1000 self vote
|
|
// 20: 1000 self vote + 250 vote
|
|
// 6 : 1000 self vote
|
|
// 2 : 2000 self vote + 250 vote.
|
|
// Winners: 20 and 2
|
|
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![6, 10]);
|
|
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![6, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// ne era
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![2, 20]);
|
|
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
check_nominator_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn wrong_vote_is_null() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).validator_pool(true).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![40, 30]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..3 { let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&i, 5000); }
|
|
|
|
// add 1 nominators
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 2000, RewardDestination::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![
|
|
11, 21, // good votes
|
|
1, 2, 15, 1000, 25 // crap votes. No effect.
|
|
]));
|
|
|
|
// new block
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_no_staked_value() {
|
|
// Behavior when someone bonds with no staked value.
|
|
// Particularly when she votes and the candidate is elected.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(3)
|
|
.existential_deposit(5)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// Can't bond with 1
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1, RewardDestination::Controller),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InsufficientValue,
|
|
);
|
|
// bonded with absolute minimum value possible.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 5, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1)[0].amount, 5);
|
|
|
|
// unbonding even 1 will cause all to be unbonded.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(2), 1));
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::ledger(2),
|
|
Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 1,
|
|
active: 0,
|
|
total: 5,
|
|
unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk {value: 5, era: 3}]
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// not yet removed.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(2)));
|
|
assert!(Staking::ledger(2).is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1)[0].amount, 5);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// poof. Account 1 is removed from the staking system.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(2)));
|
|
assert!(Staking::ledger(2).is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::locks(&1).len(), 0);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_little_staked_value_bounded_by_slot_stake() {
|
|
// Behavior when someone bonds with little staked value.
|
|
// Particularly when she votes and the candidate is elected.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(3)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
// setup
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(Origin::signed(30)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
let init_balance_2 = Balances::free_balance(&2);
|
|
let init_balance_10 = Balances::free_balance(&10);
|
|
|
|
// Stingy validator.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(2), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
let total_payout_0 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_0 > 100); // Test is meaningfull if reward something
|
|
reward_all_elected();
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// 2 is elected.
|
|
// and fucks up the slot stake.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10, 2]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Old ones are rewarded.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(10), init_balance_10 + total_payout_0 / 3);
|
|
// no rewards paid to 2. This was initial election.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(2), init_balance_2);
|
|
|
|
let total_payout_1 = current_total_payout_for_duration(3000);
|
|
assert!(total_payout_1 > 100); // Test is meaningfull if reward something
|
|
reward_all_elected();
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![20, 10, 2]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), 1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(2), init_balance_2 + total_payout_1 / 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(&10),
|
|
init_balance_10 + total_payout_0 / 3 + total_payout_1 / 3,
|
|
);
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
check_nominator_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn new_era_elects_correct_number_of_validators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(true)
|
|
.validator_pool(true)
|
|
.fair(true)
|
|
.validator_count(1)
|
|
.build()
|
|
.execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(validator_controllers().len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
System::set_block_number(1);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(validator_controllers().len(), 1);
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
check_nominator_all();
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_should_not_overflow_validators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
|
|
bond_validator(2, u64::max_value());
|
|
bond_validator(4, u64::max_value());
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(6, u64::max_value() / 2, vec![3, 5]);
|
|
bond_nominator(8, u64::max_value() / 2, vec![3, 5]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![4, 2]);
|
|
|
|
// This test will fail this. Will saturate.
|
|
// check_exposure_all();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(3).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(5).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_should_not_overflow_nominators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
|
|
bond_validator(2, u64::max_value() / 2);
|
|
bond_validator(4, u64::max_value() / 2);
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(6, u64::max_value(), vec![3, 5]);
|
|
bond_nominator(8, u64::max_value(), vec![3, 5]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![4, 2]);
|
|
|
|
// Saturate.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(3).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(5).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_should_not_overflow_ultimate() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
bond_validator(2, u64::max_value());
|
|
bond_validator(4, u64::max_value());
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(6, u64::max_value(), vec![3, 5]);
|
|
bond_nominator(8, u64::max_value(), vec![3, 5]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(validator_controllers(), vec![4, 2]);
|
|
|
|
// Saturate.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(3).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(5).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_validator_slashing_validator_doesnt_overflow() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let stake = u32::max_value() as u64 * 2;
|
|
let reward_slash = u32::max_value() as u64 * 2;
|
|
|
|
// Assert multiplication overflows in balance arithmetic.
|
|
assert!(stake.checked_mul(reward_slash).is_none());
|
|
|
|
// Set staker
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, stake);
|
|
<Stakers<Test>>::insert(&11, Exposure { total: stake, own: stake, others: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// Check reward
|
|
let _ = Staking::reward_validator(&11, reward_slash);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), stake * 2);
|
|
|
|
// Set staker
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, stake);
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&2, stake);
|
|
|
|
// only slashes out of bonded stake are applied. without this line,
|
|
// it is 0.
|
|
Staking::bond(Origin::signed(2), 20000, stake - 1, RewardDestination::default()).unwrap();
|
|
<Stakers<Test>>::insert(&11, Exposure { total: stake, own: 1, others: vec![
|
|
IndividualExposure { who: 2, value: stake - 1 }
|
|
]});
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check slashing
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::stakers(&11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(100)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), stake - 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 1);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_from_authorship_event_handler_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
use pallet_authorship::EventHandler;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(<pallet_authorship::Module<Test>>::author(), 11);
|
|
|
|
<Module<Test>>::note_author(11);
|
|
<Module<Test>>::note_uncle(21, 1);
|
|
// An uncle author that is not currently elected doesn't get rewards,
|
|
// but the block producer does get reward for referencing it.
|
|
<Module<Test>>::note_uncle(31, 1);
|
|
// Rewarding the same two times works.
|
|
<Module<Test>>::note_uncle(11, 1);
|
|
|
|
// Not mandatory but must be coherent with rewards
|
|
assert_eq!(<CurrentElected<Test>>::get(), vec![21, 11]);
|
|
|
|
// 21 is rewarded as an uncle producer
|
|
// 11 is rewarded as a block producer and uncle referencer and uncle producer
|
|
assert_eq!(CurrentEraPointsEarned::get().individual, vec![1, 20 + 2 * 3 + 1]);
|
|
assert_eq!(CurrentEraPointsEarned::get().total, 28);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn add_reward_points_fns_works() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
let validators = <Module<Test>>::current_elected();
|
|
// Not mandatory but must be coherent with rewards
|
|
assert_eq!(validators, vec![21, 11]);
|
|
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_indices(vec![
|
|
(0, 1),
|
|
(1, 1),
|
|
(2, 1),
|
|
(1, 1),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
<Module<Test>>::reward_by_ids(vec![
|
|
(21, 1),
|
|
(11, 1),
|
|
(31, 1),
|
|
(11, 1),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(CurrentEraPointsEarned::get().individual, vec![2, 4]);
|
|
assert_eq!(CurrentEraPointsEarned::get().total, 6);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn unbonded_balance_is_not_slashable() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// total amount staked is slashable.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 800));
|
|
|
|
// only the active portion.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&11), 200);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn era_is_always_same_length() {
|
|
// This ensures that the sessions is always of the same length if there is no forcing no
|
|
// session changes.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era_start_session_index(), SessionsPerEra::get());
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era_start_session_index(), SessionsPerEra::get() * 2);
|
|
|
|
let session = Session::current_index();
|
|
ForceEra::put(Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
advance_session();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era_start_session_index(), session + 1);
|
|
|
|
start_era(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era_start_session_index(), session + SessionsPerEra::get() + 1);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_forces_new_era() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::stakers(&11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(5)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_ensures_new_era_without_clobbering() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::force_new_era_always(Origin::ROOT));
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::stakers(&11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(5)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceAlways);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offence_deselects_validator_when_slash_is_zero() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(11));
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::stakers(&11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::exists(11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashing_performed_according_exposure() {
|
|
// This test checks that slashing is performed according the exposure (or more precisely,
|
|
// historical exposure), not the current balance.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11).own, 1000);
|
|
|
|
// Handle an offence with a historical exposure.
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Exposure {
|
|
total: 500,
|
|
own: 500,
|
|
others: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The stash account should be slashed for 250 (50% of 500).
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000 - 250);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slash_in_old_span_does_not_deselect() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(11));
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::stakers(&11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::exists(11));
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(10), Default::default()).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(11));
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// this staker is in a new slashing span now, having re-registered after
|
|
// their prior slash.
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::stakers(&11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// not for zero-slash.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(11));
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::stakers(&11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(100)],
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// or non-zero.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::NotForcing);
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(11));
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(11);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reporters_receive_their_slice() {
|
|
// This test verifies that the reporters of the offence receive their slice from the slashed
|
|
// amount.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// The reporters' reward is calculated from the total exposure.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1125;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11).total, initial_balance);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::stakers(&11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![1, 2],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// F1 * (reward_proportion * slash - 0)
|
|
// 50% * (10% * initial_balance / 2)
|
|
let reward = (initial_balance / 20) / 2;
|
|
let reward_each = reward / 2; // split into two pieces.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1), 10 + reward_each);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(2), 20 + reward_each);
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(11);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn subsequent_reports_in_same_span_pay_out_less() {
|
|
// This test verifies that the reporters of the offence receive their slice from the slashed
|
|
// amount.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
// The reporters' reward is calculated from the total exposure.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1125;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11).total, initial_balance);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::stakers(&11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![1],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(20)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// F1 * (reward_proportion * slash - 0)
|
|
// 50% * (10% * initial_balance * 20%)
|
|
let reward = (initial_balance / 5) / 20;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1), 10 + reward);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::stakers(&11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![1],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let prior_payout = reward;
|
|
|
|
// F1 * (reward_proportion * slash - prior_payout)
|
|
// 50% * (10% * (initial_balance / 2) - prior_payout)
|
|
let reward = ((initial_balance / 20) - prior_payout) / 2;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(1), 10 + prior_payout + reward);
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(11);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invulnerables_are_not_slashed() {
|
|
// For invulnerable validators no slashing is performed.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().invulnerables(vec![11]).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::stakers(&21);
|
|
let initial_balance = Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21);
|
|
|
|
let nominator_balances: Vec<_> = exposure.others
|
|
.iter().map(|o| Balances::free_balance(&o.who)).collect();
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::stakers(&11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::stakers(&21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50), Perbill::from_percent(20)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator 11 hasn't been slashed, but 21 has been.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
// 2000 - (0.2 * initial_balance)
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000 - (2 * initial_balance / 10));
|
|
|
|
// ensure that nominators were slashed as well.
|
|
for (initial_balance, other) in nominator_balances.into_iter().zip(exposure.others) {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::free_balance(&other.who),
|
|
initial_balance - (2 * other.value / 10),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(11);
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(21);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn dont_slash_if_fraction_is_zero() {
|
|
// Don't slash if the fraction is zero.
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (
|
|
11,
|
|
Staking::stakers(&11),
|
|
),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator hasn't been slashed. The new era is not forced.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(11);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn only_slash_for_max_in_era() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::stakers(&11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator has been slashed and has been force-chilled.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 500);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::force_era(), Forcing::ForceNew);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::stakers(&11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator has not been slashed additionally.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 500);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::stakers(&11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(60)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// The validator got slashed 10% more.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 400);
|
|
assert_ledger_consistent(11);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn garbage_collection_after_slashing() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().existential_deposit(1).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 256_000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::stakers(&11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 256_000 - 25_600);
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as crate::Store>::SpanSlash::get(&(11, 0)).amount_slashed(), &25_600);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::stakers(&11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(100)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// validator and nominator slash in era are garbage-collected by era change,
|
|
// so we don't test those here.
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 0);
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as crate::Store>::SpanSlash::get(&(11, 0)).amount_slashed(), &0);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn garbage_collection_on_window_pruning() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::stakers(&11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::stakers(&11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let now = Staking::current_era();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - (nominated_value / 10));
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::ValidatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &11).is_some());
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::NominatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &101).is_some());
|
|
|
|
// + 1 because we have to exit the bonding window.
|
|
for era in (0..(BondingDuration::get() + 1)).map(|offset| offset + now + 1) {
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::ValidatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &11).is_some());
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::NominatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &101).is_some());
|
|
|
|
start_era(era);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::ValidatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &11).is_none());
|
|
assert!(<Staking as crate::Store>::NominatorSlashInEra::get(&now, &101).is_none());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashing_nominators_by_span_max() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21), 1000);
|
|
|
|
|
|
let exposure_11 = Staking::stakers(&11);
|
|
let exposure_21 = Staking::stakers(&21);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value_11 = exposure_11.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
let nominated_value_21 = exposure_21.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::stakers(&11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
|
|
let slash_1_amount = Perbill::from_percent(10) * nominated_value_11;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - slash_1_amount);
|
|
|
|
let expected_spans = vec![
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 1, start: 4, length: None },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 0, start: 0, length: Some(4) },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
let get_span = |account| <Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&account).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
get_span(11).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
expected_spans,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
get_span(101).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
|
expected_spans,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// second slash: higher era, higher value, same span.
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::stakers(&21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(30)],
|
|
3,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 11 was not further slashed, but 21 and 101 were.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1700);
|
|
|
|
let slash_2_amount = Perbill::from_percent(30) * nominated_value_21;
|
|
assert!(slash_2_amount > slash_1_amount);
|
|
|
|
// only the maximum slash in a single span is taken.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - slash_2_amount);
|
|
|
|
// third slash: in same era and on same validator as first, higher
|
|
// in-era value, but lower slash value than slash 2.
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::stakers(&11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(20)],
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 11 was further slashed, but 21 and 101 were not.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 800);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1700);
|
|
|
|
let slash_3_amount = Perbill::from_percent(20) * nominated_value_21;
|
|
assert!(slash_3_amount < slash_2_amount);
|
|
assert!(slash_3_amount > slash_1_amount);
|
|
|
|
// only the maximum slash in a single span is taken.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - slash_2_amount);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashes_are_summed_across_spans() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 2000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let get_span = |account| <Staking as crate::Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&account).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::stakers(&21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let expected_spans = vec![
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 1, start: 4, length: None },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 0, start: 0, length: Some(4) },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(get_span(21).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), expected_spans);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1900);
|
|
|
|
// 21 has been force-chilled. re-signal intent to validate.
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(20), Default::default()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
start_era(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&21), 900);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::stakers(&21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let expected_spans = vec![
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 2, start: 5, length: None },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 1, start: 4, length: Some(1) },
|
|
slashing::SlashingSpan { index: 0, start: 0, length: Some(4) },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(get_span(21).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), expected_spans);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(21), 1810);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn deferred_slashes_are_deferred() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::stakers(&11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, Staking::stakers(&11)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// at the start of era 4, slashes from era 1 are processed,
|
|
// after being deferred for at least 2 full eras.
|
|
start_era(4);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - (nominated_value / 10));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn remove_deferred() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::stakers(&11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_in_era(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(15)],
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::ROOT, 1, vec![0]).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// at the start of era 4, slashes from era 1 are processed,
|
|
// after being deferred for at least 2 full eras.
|
|
start_era(4);
|
|
|
|
// the first slash for 10% was cancelled, so no effect.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
start_era(5);
|
|
|
|
let slash_10 = Perbill::from_percent(10);
|
|
let slash_15 = Perbill::from_percent(15);
|
|
let initial_slash = slash_10 * nominated_value;
|
|
|
|
let total_slash = slash_15 * nominated_value;
|
|
let actual_slash = total_slash - initial_slash;
|
|
|
|
// 5% slash (15 - 10) processed now.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 950);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - actual_slash);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn remove_multi_deferred() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().slash_defer_duration(2).build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::stakers(&11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (21, Staking::stakers(&21)),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(25)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as Store>::UnappliedSlashes::get(&1).len(), 3);
|
|
Staking::cancel_deferred_slash(Origin::ROOT, 1, vec![0, 2]).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let slashes = <Staking as Store>::UnappliedSlashes::get(&1);
|
|
assert_eq!(slashes.len(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(slashes[0].validator, 21);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn version_initialized() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(<Staking as Store>::StorageVersion::get(), crate::migration::CURRENT_VERSION);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slash_kicks_validators_not_nominators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::stakers(&11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
let nominated_value = exposure.others.iter().find(|o| o.who == 101).unwrap().value;
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000 - (nominated_value / 10));
|
|
|
|
// This is the best way to check that the validator was chilled; `get` will
|
|
// return default value.
|
|
for (stash, _) in <Staking as Store>::Validators::enumerate() {
|
|
assert!(stash != 11);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let nominations = <Staking as Store>::Nominators::get(&101).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// and make sure that the vote will be ignored even if the validator
|
|
// re-registers.
|
|
let last_slash = <Staking as Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).unwrap().last_nonzero_slash();
|
|
assert!(nominations.submitted_in < last_slash);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn migration_v2() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
use crate::{EraIndex, slashing::SpanIndex};
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Encode)]
|
|
struct V1SlashingSpans {
|
|
span_index: SpanIndex,
|
|
last_start: EraIndex,
|
|
prior: Vec<EraIndex>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// inject old-style values directly into storage.
|
|
let set = |stash, spans: V1SlashingSpans| {
|
|
let key = <Staking as Store>::SlashingSpans::hashed_key_for(stash);
|
|
sp_io::storage::set(&key, &spans.encode());
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
let spans_11 = V1SlashingSpans {
|
|
span_index: 10,
|
|
last_start: 1,
|
|
prior: vec![0],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
let spans_21 = V1SlashingSpans {
|
|
span_index: 1,
|
|
last_start: 5,
|
|
prior: vec![],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
set(11, spans_11);
|
|
set(21, spans_21);
|
|
|
|
<Staking as Store>::StorageVersion::put(1);
|
|
|
|
// perform migration.
|
|
crate::migration::inner::to_v2::<Test>(&mut 1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Staking as Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).unwrap().last_nonzero_slash(),
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Staking as Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&21).unwrap().last_nonzero_slash(),
|
|
5,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn zero_slash_keeps_nominators() {
|
|
ExtBuilder::default().build().execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
|
|
let exposure = Staking::stakers(&11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
on_offence_now(
|
|
&[
|
|
OffenceDetails {
|
|
offender: (11, exposure.clone()),
|
|
reporters: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
&[Perbill::from_percent(0)],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
|
|
|
|
// This is the best way to check that the validator was chilled; `get` will
|
|
// return default value.
|
|
for (stash, _) in <Staking as Store>::Validators::enumerate() {
|
|
assert!(stash != 11);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let nominations = <Staking as Store>::Nominators::get(&101).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// and make sure that the vote will not be ignored, because the slash was
|
|
// zero.
|
|
let last_slash = <Staking as Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11).unwrap().last_nonzero_slash();
|
|
assert!(nominations.submitted_in >= last_slash);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|