mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-05-30 08:11:03 +00:00
aafe64315a
* Remove extra commas made redundent after rustfmt
879 lines
26 KiB
Rust
879 lines
26 KiB
Rust
// This file is part of Substrate.
|
|
|
|
// Copyright (C) 2017-2021 Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
|
|
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
//
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
//
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
//! Tests for the module.
|
|
|
|
#![cfg(test)]
|
|
|
|
use super::{Call, Event, *};
|
|
use crate::mock::*;
|
|
use codec::Encode;
|
|
use fg_primitives::ScheduledChange;
|
|
use frame_support::{
|
|
assert_err, assert_noop, assert_ok,
|
|
traits::{Currency, OnFinalize, OneSessionHandler},
|
|
weights::{GetDispatchInfo, Pays},
|
|
};
|
|
use frame_system::{EventRecord, Phase};
|
|
use sp_core::H256;
|
|
use sp_keyring::Ed25519Keyring;
|
|
use sp_runtime::testing::Digest;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn authorities_change_logged() {
|
|
new_test_ext(vec![(1, 1), (2, 1), (3, 1)]).execute_with(|| {
|
|
initialize_block(1, Default::default());
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(4, 1), (5, 1), (6, 1)]), 0, None).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
System::note_finished_extrinsics();
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(1);
|
|
|
|
let header = System::finalize();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
header.digest,
|
|
Digest {
|
|
logs: vec![grandpa_log(ConsensusLog::ScheduledChange(ScheduledChange {
|
|
delay: 0,
|
|
next_authorities: to_authorities(vec![(4, 1), (5, 1), (6, 1)])
|
|
})),],
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
System::events(),
|
|
vec![EventRecord {
|
|
phase: Phase::Finalization,
|
|
event: Event::NewAuthorities(to_authorities(vec![(4, 1), (5, 1), (6, 1)])).into(),
|
|
topics: vec![],
|
|
},]
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn authorities_change_logged_after_delay() {
|
|
new_test_ext(vec![(1, 1), (2, 1), (3, 1)]).execute_with(|| {
|
|
initialize_block(1, Default::default());
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(4, 1), (5, 1), (6, 1)]), 1, None).unwrap();
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(1);
|
|
let header = System::finalize();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
header.digest,
|
|
Digest {
|
|
logs: vec![grandpa_log(ConsensusLog::ScheduledChange(ScheduledChange {
|
|
delay: 1,
|
|
next_authorities: to_authorities(vec![(4, 1), (5, 1), (6, 1)])
|
|
})),],
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// no change at this height.
|
|
assert_eq!(System::events(), vec![]);
|
|
|
|
initialize_block(2, header.hash());
|
|
System::note_finished_extrinsics();
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(2);
|
|
|
|
let _header = System::finalize();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
System::events(),
|
|
vec![EventRecord {
|
|
phase: Phase::Finalization,
|
|
event: Event::NewAuthorities(to_authorities(vec![(4, 1), (5, 1), (6, 1)])).into(),
|
|
topics: vec![],
|
|
},]
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_schedule_change_when_one_pending() {
|
|
new_test_ext(vec![(1, 1), (2, 1), (3, 1)]).execute_with(|| {
|
|
initialize_block(1, Default::default());
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(4, 1), (5, 1), (6, 1)]), 1, None).unwrap();
|
|
assert!(<PendingChange<Test>>::exists());
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(5, 1)]), 1, None),
|
|
Error::<Test>::ChangePending
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(1);
|
|
let header = System::finalize();
|
|
|
|
initialize_block(2, header.hash());
|
|
assert!(<PendingChange<Test>>::exists());
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(5, 1)]), 1, None),
|
|
Error::<Test>::ChangePending
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(2);
|
|
let header = System::finalize();
|
|
|
|
initialize_block(3, header.hash());
|
|
assert!(!<PendingChange<Test>>::exists());
|
|
assert_ok!(Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(5, 1)]), 1, None));
|
|
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(3);
|
|
let _header = System::finalize();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn dispatch_forced_change() {
|
|
new_test_ext(vec![(1, 1), (2, 1), (3, 1)]).execute_with(|| {
|
|
initialize_block(1, Default::default());
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(4, 1), (5, 1), (6, 1)]), 5, Some(0)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert!(<PendingChange<Test>>::exists());
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(5, 1)]), 1, Some(0)),
|
|
Error::<Test>::ChangePending
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(1);
|
|
let mut header = System::finalize();
|
|
|
|
for i in 2..7 {
|
|
initialize_block(i, header.hash());
|
|
assert!(<PendingChange<Test>>::get().unwrap().forced.is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::next_forced(), Some(11));
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(5, 1)]), 1, None),
|
|
Error::<Test>::ChangePending
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(5, 1)]), 1, Some(0)),
|
|
Error::<Test>::ChangePending
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(i);
|
|
header = System::finalize();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// change has been applied at the end of block 6.
|
|
// add a normal change.
|
|
{
|
|
initialize_block(7, header.hash());
|
|
assert!(!<PendingChange<Test>>::exists());
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Grandpa::grandpa_authorities(),
|
|
to_authorities(vec![(4, 1), (5, 1), (6, 1)])
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(5, 1)]), 1, None));
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(7);
|
|
header = System::finalize();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// run the normal change.
|
|
{
|
|
initialize_block(8, header.hash());
|
|
assert!(<PendingChange<Test>>::exists());
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Grandpa::grandpa_authorities(),
|
|
to_authorities(vec![(4, 1), (5, 1), (6, 1)])
|
|
);
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(5, 1)]), 1, None),
|
|
Error::<Test>::ChangePending
|
|
);
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(8);
|
|
header = System::finalize();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// normal change applied. but we can't apply a new forced change for some
|
|
// time.
|
|
for i in 9..11 {
|
|
initialize_block(i, header.hash());
|
|
assert!(!<PendingChange<Test>>::exists());
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::grandpa_authorities(), to_authorities(vec![(5, 1)]));
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::next_forced(), Some(11));
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(5, 1), (6, 1)]), 5, Some(0)),
|
|
Error::<Test>::TooSoon
|
|
);
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(i);
|
|
header = System::finalize();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
initialize_block(11, header.hash());
|
|
assert!(!<PendingChange<Test>>::exists());
|
|
assert_ok!(Grandpa::schedule_change(
|
|
to_authorities(vec![(5, 1), (6, 1), (7, 1)]),
|
|
5,
|
|
Some(0)
|
|
));
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::next_forced(), Some(21));
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(11);
|
|
header = System::finalize();
|
|
}
|
|
let _ = header;
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn schedule_pause_only_when_live() {
|
|
new_test_ext(vec![(1, 1), (2, 1), (3, 1)]).execute_with(|| {
|
|
// we schedule a pause at block 1 with delay of 1
|
|
initialize_block(1, Default::default());
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_pause(1).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// we've switched to the pending pause state
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::state(), StoredState::PendingPause { scheduled_at: 1u64, delay: 1 });
|
|
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(1);
|
|
let _ = System::finalize();
|
|
|
|
initialize_block(2, Default::default());
|
|
|
|
// signaling a pause now should fail
|
|
assert_noop!(Grandpa::schedule_pause(1), Error::<Test>::PauseFailed);
|
|
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(2);
|
|
let _ = System::finalize();
|
|
|
|
// after finalizing block 2 the set should have switched to paused state
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::state(), StoredState::Paused);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn schedule_resume_only_when_paused() {
|
|
new_test_ext(vec![(1, 1), (2, 1), (3, 1)]).execute_with(|| {
|
|
initialize_block(1, Default::default());
|
|
|
|
// the set is currently live, resuming it is an error
|
|
assert_noop!(Grandpa::schedule_resume(1), Error::<Test>::ResumeFailed);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::state(), StoredState::Live);
|
|
|
|
// we schedule a pause to be applied instantly
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_pause(0).unwrap();
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(1);
|
|
let _ = System::finalize();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::state(), StoredState::Paused);
|
|
|
|
// we schedule the set to go back live in 2 blocks
|
|
initialize_block(2, Default::default());
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_resume(2).unwrap();
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(2);
|
|
let _ = System::finalize();
|
|
|
|
initialize_block(3, Default::default());
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(3);
|
|
let _ = System::finalize();
|
|
|
|
initialize_block(4, Default::default());
|
|
Grandpa::on_finalize(4);
|
|
let _ = System::finalize();
|
|
|
|
// it should be live at block 4
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::state(), StoredState::Live);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn time_slot_have_sane_ord() {
|
|
// Ensure that `Ord` implementation is sane.
|
|
const FIXTURE: &[GrandpaTimeSlot] = &[
|
|
GrandpaTimeSlot { set_id: 0, round: 0 },
|
|
GrandpaTimeSlot { set_id: 0, round: 1 },
|
|
GrandpaTimeSlot { set_id: 1, round: 0 },
|
|
GrandpaTimeSlot { set_id: 1, round: 1 },
|
|
GrandpaTimeSlot { set_id: 1, round: 2 },
|
|
];
|
|
assert!(FIXTURE.windows(2).all(|f| f[0] < f[1]));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns a list with 3 authorities with known keys:
|
|
/// Alice, Bob and Charlie.
|
|
pub fn test_authorities() -> AuthorityList {
|
|
let authorities = vec![Ed25519Keyring::Alice, Ed25519Keyring::Bob, Ed25519Keyring::Charlie];
|
|
|
|
authorities.into_iter().map(|id| (id.public().into(), 1u64)).collect()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_current_set_works() {
|
|
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
|
|
|
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), Some(0));
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let authorities = Grandpa::grandpa_authorities();
|
|
let validators = Session::validators();
|
|
|
|
// make sure that all validators have the same balance
|
|
for validator in &validators {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(validator), 10_000_000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(validator), 10_000);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(1, validator),
|
|
pallet_staking::Exposure { total: 10_000, own: 10_000, others: vec![] },
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
|
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index].0;
|
|
let equivocation_keyring = extract_keyring(equivocation_key);
|
|
|
|
let set_id = Grandpa::current_set_id();
|
|
|
|
// generate an equivocation proof, with two votes in the same round for
|
|
// different block hashes signed by the same key
|
|
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
set_id,
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// create the key ownership proof
|
|
let key_owner_proof =
|
|
Historical::prove((sp_finality_grandpa::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// report the equivocation and the tx should be dispatched successfully
|
|
assert_ok!(Grandpa::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
Origin::none(),
|
|
equivocation_proof,
|
|
key_owner_proof,
|
|
),);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// check that the balance of 0-th validator is slashed 100%.
|
|
let equivocation_validator_id = validators[equivocation_authority_index];
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&equivocation_validator_id), 10_000_000 - 10_000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&equivocation_validator_id), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(2, equivocation_validator_id),
|
|
pallet_staking::Exposure { total: 0, own: 0, others: vec![] },
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// check that the balances of all other validators are left intact.
|
|
for validator in &validators {
|
|
if *validator == equivocation_validator_id {
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(validator), 10_000_000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(validator), 10_000);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(2, validator),
|
|
pallet_staking::Exposure { total: 10_000, own: 10_000, others: vec![] },
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_old_set_works() {
|
|
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
|
|
|
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let authorities = Grandpa::grandpa_authorities();
|
|
let validators = Session::validators();
|
|
|
|
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
|
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index].0;
|
|
|
|
// create the key ownership proof in the "old" set
|
|
let key_owner_proof =
|
|
Historical::prove((sp_finality_grandpa::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// make sure that all authorities have the same balance
|
|
for validator in &validators {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(validator), 10_000_000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(validator), 10_000);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(2, validator),
|
|
pallet_staking::Exposure { total: 10_000, own: 10_000, others: vec![] },
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let equivocation_keyring = extract_keyring(equivocation_key);
|
|
|
|
let set_id = Grandpa::current_set_id();
|
|
|
|
// generate an equivocation proof for the old set,
|
|
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
set_id - 1,
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// report the equivocation using the key ownership proof generated on
|
|
// the old set, the tx should be dispatched successfully
|
|
assert_ok!(Grandpa::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
Origin::none(),
|
|
equivocation_proof,
|
|
key_owner_proof,
|
|
),);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// check that the balance of 0-th validator is slashed 100%.
|
|
let equivocation_validator_id = validators[equivocation_authority_index];
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&equivocation_validator_id), 10_000_000 - 10_000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&equivocation_validator_id), 0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(3, equivocation_validator_id),
|
|
pallet_staking::Exposure { total: 0, own: 0, others: vec![] },
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// check that the balances of all other validators are left intact.
|
|
for validator in &validators {
|
|
if *validator == equivocation_validator_id {
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(validator), 10_000_000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(validator), 10_000);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(3, validator),
|
|
pallet_staking::Exposure { total: 10_000, own: 10_000, others: vec![] },
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_invalid_set_id() {
|
|
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
|
|
|
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let authorities = Grandpa::grandpa_authorities();
|
|
|
|
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
|
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index].0;
|
|
let equivocation_keyring = extract_keyring(equivocation_key);
|
|
|
|
let key_owner_proof =
|
|
Historical::prove((sp_finality_grandpa::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let set_id = Grandpa::current_set_id();
|
|
|
|
// generate an equivocation for a future set
|
|
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
set_id + 1,
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// the call for reporting the equivocation should error
|
|
assert_err!(
|
|
Grandpa::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
Origin::none(),
|
|
equivocation_proof,
|
|
key_owner_proof,
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEquivocationProof,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_invalid_session() {
|
|
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
|
|
|
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let authorities = Grandpa::grandpa_authorities();
|
|
|
|
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
|
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index].0;
|
|
let equivocation_keyring = extract_keyring(equivocation_key);
|
|
|
|
// generate a key ownership proof at set id = 1
|
|
let key_owner_proof =
|
|
Historical::prove((sp_finality_grandpa::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
let set_id = Grandpa::current_set_id();
|
|
|
|
// generate an equivocation proof at set id = 2
|
|
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
set_id,
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// report an equivocation for the current set using an key ownership
|
|
// proof from the previous set, the session should be invalid.
|
|
assert_err!(
|
|
Grandpa::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
Origin::none(),
|
|
equivocation_proof,
|
|
key_owner_proof,
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEquivocationProof,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_invalid_key_owner_proof() {
|
|
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
|
|
|
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
let authorities = Grandpa::grandpa_authorities();
|
|
|
|
let invalid_owner_authority_index = 1;
|
|
let invalid_owner_key = &authorities[invalid_owner_authority_index].0;
|
|
|
|
// generate a key ownership proof for the authority at index 1
|
|
let invalid_key_owner_proof =
|
|
Historical::prove((sp_finality_grandpa::KEY_TYPE, &invalid_owner_key)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
|
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index].0;
|
|
let equivocation_keyring = extract_keyring(equivocation_key);
|
|
|
|
let set_id = Grandpa::current_set_id();
|
|
|
|
// generate an equivocation proof for the authority at index 0
|
|
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
set_id,
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// we need to start a new era otherwise the key ownership proof won't be
|
|
// checked since the authorities are part of the current session
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// report an equivocation for the current set using a key ownership
|
|
// proof for a different key than the one in the equivocation proof.
|
|
assert_err!(
|
|
Grandpa::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
Origin::none(),
|
|
equivocation_proof,
|
|
invalid_key_owner_proof,
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidKeyOwnershipProof,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_invalid_equivocation_proof() {
|
|
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
|
|
|
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let authorities = Grandpa::grandpa_authorities();
|
|
|
|
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
|
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index].0;
|
|
let equivocation_keyring = extract_keyring(equivocation_key);
|
|
|
|
// generate a key ownership proof at set id = 1
|
|
let key_owner_proof =
|
|
Historical::prove((sp_finality_grandpa::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let set_id = Grandpa::current_set_id();
|
|
|
|
let assert_invalid_equivocation_proof = |equivocation_proof| {
|
|
assert_err!(
|
|
Grandpa::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
Origin::none(),
|
|
equivocation_proof,
|
|
key_owner_proof.clone(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEquivocationProof,
|
|
);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// both votes target the same block number and hash,
|
|
// there is no equivocation.
|
|
assert_invalid_equivocation_proof(generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
set_id,
|
|
(1, H256::zero(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
(1, H256::zero(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// votes targetting different rounds, there is no equivocation.
|
|
assert_invalid_equivocation_proof(generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
set_id,
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
(2, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// votes signed with different authority keys
|
|
assert_invalid_equivocation_proof(generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
set_id,
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &Ed25519Keyring::Charlie),
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// votes signed with a key that isn't part of the authority set
|
|
assert_invalid_equivocation_proof(generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
set_id,
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &Ed25519Keyring::Dave),
|
|
));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_validate_unsigned_prevents_duplicates() {
|
|
use sp_runtime::transaction_validity::{
|
|
InvalidTransaction, TransactionPriority, TransactionSource, TransactionValidity,
|
|
ValidTransaction,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
|
|
|
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let authorities = Grandpa::grandpa_authorities();
|
|
|
|
// generate and report an equivocation for the validator at index 0
|
|
let equivocation_authority_index = 0;
|
|
let equivocation_key = &authorities[equivocation_authority_index].0;
|
|
let equivocation_keyring = extract_keyring(equivocation_key);
|
|
let set_id = Grandpa::current_set_id();
|
|
|
|
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
set_id,
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let key_owner_proof =
|
|
Historical::prove((sp_finality_grandpa::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let call =
|
|
Call::report_equivocation_unsigned(equivocation_proof.clone(), key_owner_proof.clone());
|
|
|
|
// only local/inblock reports are allowed
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Grandpa as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
|
|
TransactionSource::External,
|
|
&call,
|
|
),
|
|
InvalidTransaction::Call.into(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// the transaction is valid when passed as local
|
|
let tx_tag = (equivocation_key, set_id, 1u64);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Grandpa as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
|
|
TransactionSource::Local,
|
|
&call,
|
|
),
|
|
TransactionValidity::Ok(ValidTransaction {
|
|
priority: TransactionPriority::max_value(),
|
|
requires: vec![],
|
|
provides: vec![("GrandpaEquivocation", tx_tag).encode()],
|
|
longevity: ReportLongevity::get(),
|
|
propagate: false,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// the pre dispatch checks should also pass
|
|
assert_ok!(<Grandpa as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::pre_dispatch(&call));
|
|
|
|
// we submit the report
|
|
Grandpa::report_equivocation_unsigned(Origin::none(), equivocation_proof, key_owner_proof)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// the report should now be considered stale and the transaction is invalid
|
|
// the check for staleness should be done on both `validate_unsigned` and on `pre_dispatch`
|
|
assert_err!(
|
|
<Grandpa as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
|
|
TransactionSource::Local,
|
|
&call,
|
|
),
|
|
InvalidTransaction::Stale,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_err!(
|
|
<Grandpa as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::pre_dispatch(&call),
|
|
InvalidTransaction::Stale,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn on_new_session_doesnt_start_new_set_if_schedule_change_failed() {
|
|
new_test_ext(vec![(1, 1), (2, 1), (3, 1)]).execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::current_set_id(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// starting a new era should lead to a change in the session
|
|
// validators and trigger a new set
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::current_set_id(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// we schedule a change delayed by 2 blocks, this should make it so that
|
|
// when we try to rotate the session at the beginning of the era we will
|
|
// fail to schedule a change (there's already one pending), so we should
|
|
// not increment the set id.
|
|
Grandpa::schedule_change(to_authorities(vec![(1, 1)]), 2, None).unwrap();
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::current_set_id(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// everything should go back to normal after.
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::current_set_id(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// session rotation might also fail to schedule a change if it's for a
|
|
// forced change (i.e. grandpa is stalled) and it is too soon.
|
|
<NextForced<Test>>::put(1000);
|
|
<Stalled<Test>>::put((30, 1));
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: we cannot go through normal era rotation since having `Stalled`
|
|
// defined will also trigger a new set (regardless of whether the
|
|
// session validators changed)
|
|
Grandpa::on_new_session(true, std::iter::empty(), std::iter::empty());
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::current_set_id(), 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn always_schedules_a_change_on_new_session_when_stalled() {
|
|
new_test_ext(vec![(1, 1), (2, 1), (3, 1)]).execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(Grandpa::pending_change().is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::current_set_id(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// if the session handler reports no change then we should not schedule
|
|
// any pending change
|
|
Grandpa::on_new_session(false, std::iter::empty(), std::iter::empty());
|
|
|
|
assert!(Grandpa::pending_change().is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::current_set_id(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// if grandpa is stalled then we should **always** schedule a forced
|
|
// change on a new session
|
|
<Stalled<Test>>::put((10, 1));
|
|
Grandpa::on_new_session(false, std::iter::empty(), std::iter::empty());
|
|
|
|
assert!(Grandpa::pending_change().is_some());
|
|
assert!(Grandpa::pending_change().unwrap().forced.is_some());
|
|
assert_eq!(Grandpa::current_set_id(), 2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_has_valid_weight() {
|
|
// the weight depends on the size of the validator set,
|
|
// but there's a lower bound of 100 validators.
|
|
assert!((1..=100)
|
|
.map(<Test as Config>::WeightInfo::report_equivocation)
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
|
|
.windows(2)
|
|
.all(|w| w[0] == w[1]));
|
|
|
|
// after 100 validators the weight should keep increasing
|
|
// with every extra validator.
|
|
assert!((100..=1000)
|
|
.map(<Test as Config>::WeightInfo::report_equivocation)
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
|
|
.windows(2)
|
|
.all(|w| w[0] < w[1]));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn valid_equivocation_reports_dont_pay_fees() {
|
|
let authorities = test_authorities();
|
|
|
|
new_test_ext_raw_authorities(authorities).execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let equivocation_key = &Grandpa::grandpa_authorities()[0].0;
|
|
let equivocation_keyring = extract_keyring(equivocation_key);
|
|
let set_id = Grandpa::current_set_id();
|
|
|
|
// generate an equivocation proof.
|
|
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
set_id,
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
(1, H256::random(), 10, &equivocation_keyring),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// create the key ownership proof.
|
|
let key_owner_proof =
|
|
Historical::prove((sp_finality_grandpa::KEY_TYPE, &equivocation_key)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// check the dispatch info for the call.
|
|
let info = Call::<Test>::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
equivocation_proof.clone(),
|
|
key_owner_proof.clone(),
|
|
)
|
|
.get_dispatch_info();
|
|
|
|
// it should have non-zero weight and the fee has to be paid.
|
|
assert!(info.weight > 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(info.pays_fee, Pays::Yes);
|
|
|
|
// report the equivocation.
|
|
let post_info = Grandpa::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
Origin::none(),
|
|
equivocation_proof.clone(),
|
|
key_owner_proof.clone(),
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// the original weight should be kept, but given that the report
|
|
// is valid the fee is waived.
|
|
assert!(post_info.actual_weight.is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(post_info.pays_fee, Pays::No);
|
|
|
|
// report the equivocation again which is invalid now since it is
|
|
// duplicate.
|
|
let post_info = Grandpa::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
Origin::none(),
|
|
equivocation_proof,
|
|
key_owner_proof,
|
|
)
|
|
.err()
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.post_info;
|
|
|
|
// the fee is not waived and the original weight is kept.
|
|
assert!(post_info.actual_weight.is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(post_info.pays_fee, Pays::Yes);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|