Files
pezkuwi-subxt/substrate/primitives/consensus/sassafras/src/ticket.rs
T
Dcompoze 002d9260f9 Fix spelling mistakes across the whole repository (#3808)
**Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.

**This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
repository.**

Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:

- `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`

- `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`

- `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
tracing`

Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
commits for easier reviewing:

- `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'children'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'until'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'indices'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'committed'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'topology'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'response'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'network'`

Let me know if this structure is adequate.

**Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`,
`Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it
as it is.

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to
message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left
it as it is.~~

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the
more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the
correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~

**Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs
`judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc.
are both present in different places, but I suppose that's
understandable given the number of contributors.

~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it
triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it
is.~~
2024-03-26 13:57:57 +00:00

127 lines
4.3 KiB
Rust

// This file is part of Substrate.
// Copyright (C) Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
//! Primitives related to tickets.
use crate::vrf::RingVrfSignature;
use scale_codec::{Decode, Encode, MaxEncodedLen};
use scale_info::TypeInfo;
pub use sp_core::ed25519::{Public as EphemeralPublic, Signature as EphemeralSignature};
/// Ticket identifier.
///
/// Its value is the output of a VRF whose inputs cannot be controlled by the
/// ticket's creator (refer to [`crate::vrf::ticket_id_input`] parameters).
/// Because of this, it is also used as the ticket score to compare against
/// the epoch ticket's threshold to decide if the ticket is worth being considered
/// for slot assignment (refer to [`ticket_id_threshold`]).
pub type TicketId = u128;
/// Ticket data persisted on-chain.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Encode, Decode, MaxEncodedLen, TypeInfo)]
pub struct TicketBody {
/// Attempt index.
pub attempt_idx: u32,
/// Ephemeral public key which gets erased when the ticket is claimed.
pub erased_public: EphemeralPublic,
/// Ephemeral public key which gets exposed when the ticket is claimed.
pub revealed_public: EphemeralPublic,
}
/// Ticket ring vrf signature.
pub type TicketSignature = RingVrfSignature;
/// Ticket envelope used on during submission.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Encode, Decode, MaxEncodedLen, TypeInfo)]
pub struct TicketEnvelope {
/// Ticket body.
pub body: TicketBody,
/// Ring signature.
pub signature: TicketSignature,
}
/// Ticket claim information filled by the block author.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Encode, Decode, MaxEncodedLen, TypeInfo)]
pub struct TicketClaim {
/// Signature verified via `TicketBody::erased_public`.
pub erased_signature: EphemeralSignature,
}
/// Computes a boundary for [`TicketId`] maximum allowed value for a given epoch.
///
/// Only ticket identifiers below this threshold should be considered as candidates
/// for slot assignment.
///
/// The value is computed as `TicketId::MAX*(redundancy*slots)/(attempts*validators)`
///
/// Where:
/// - `redundancy`: redundancy factor;
/// - `slots`: number of slots in epoch;
/// - `attempts`: max number of tickets attempts per validator;
/// - `validators`: number of validators in epoch.
///
/// If `attempts * validators = 0` then we return 0.
///
/// For details about the formula and implications refer to
/// [*probabilities an parameters*](https://research.web3.foundation/Polkadot/protocols/block-production/SASSAFRAS#probabilities-and-parameters)
/// paragraph of the w3f introduction to the protocol.
// TODO: replace with [RFC-26](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/pull/26)
// "Tickets Threshold" paragraph once is merged
pub fn ticket_id_threshold(
redundancy: u32,
slots: u32,
attempts: u32,
validators: u32,
) -> TicketId {
let num = redundancy as u64 * slots as u64;
let den = attempts as u64 * validators as u64;
TicketId::max_value()
.checked_div(den.into())
.unwrap_or_default()
.saturating_mul(num.into())
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
// This is a trivial example/check which just better explain explains the rationale
// behind the threshold.
//
// After this reading the formula should become obvious.
#[test]
fn ticket_id_threshold_trivial_check() {
// For an epoch with `s` slots we want to accept a number of tickets equal to ~s·r
let redundancy = 2;
let slots = 1000;
let attempts = 100;
let validators = 500;
let threshold = ticket_id_threshold(redundancy, slots, attempts, validators);
let threshold = threshold as f64 / TicketId::MAX as f64;
// We expect that the total number of tickets allowed to be submitted
// is slots*redundancy
let avt = ((attempts * validators) as f64 * threshold) as u32;
assert_eq!(avt, slots * redundancy);
println!("threshold: {}", threshold);
println!("avt = {}", avt);
}
}