mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-04-26 22:47:56 +00:00
42a4c2eef0
* Add `WeightInfo` to Babe Pallet * Also grandpa * Update frame/grandpa/src/default_weights.rs Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: André Silva <123550+andresilva@users.noreply.github.com>
670 lines
19 KiB
Rust
670 lines
19 KiB
Rust
// This file is part of Substrate.
|
|
|
|
// Copyright (C) 2019-2020 Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
|
|
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
//
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
//
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
//! Consensus extension module tests for BABE consensus.
|
|
|
|
use super::{Call, *};
|
|
use frame_support::{
|
|
assert_err, assert_ok,
|
|
traits::{Currency, OnFinalize},
|
|
weights::{GetDispatchInfo, Pays},
|
|
};
|
|
use mock::*;
|
|
use pallet_session::ShouldEndSession;
|
|
use sp_consensus_babe::AllowedSlots;
|
|
use sp_consensus_vrf::schnorrkel::{VRFOutput, VRFProof};
|
|
use sp_core::crypto::{IsWrappedBy, Pair};
|
|
|
|
const EMPTY_RANDOMNESS: [u8; 32] = [
|
|
74, 25, 49, 128, 53, 97, 244, 49,
|
|
222, 202, 176, 2, 231, 66, 95, 10,
|
|
133, 49, 213, 228, 86, 161, 164, 127,
|
|
217, 153, 138, 37, 48, 192, 248, 0,
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn empty_randomness_is_correct() {
|
|
let s = compute_randomness([0; RANDOMNESS_LENGTH], 0, std::iter::empty(), None);
|
|
assert_eq!(s, EMPTY_RANDOMNESS);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn initial_values() {
|
|
new_test_ext(4).execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::authorities().len(), 4)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn check_module() {
|
|
new_test_ext(4).execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert!(!Babe::should_end_session(0), "Genesis does not change sessions");
|
|
assert!(!Babe::should_end_session(200000),
|
|
"BABE does not include the block number in epoch calculations");
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn first_block_epoch_zero_start() {
|
|
let (pairs, mut ext) = new_test_ext_with_pairs(4);
|
|
|
|
ext.execute_with(|| {
|
|
let genesis_slot = 100;
|
|
|
|
let pair = sp_core::sr25519::Pair::from_ref(&pairs[0]).as_ref();
|
|
let transcript = sp_consensus_babe::make_transcript(
|
|
&Babe::randomness(),
|
|
genesis_slot,
|
|
0,
|
|
);
|
|
let vrf_inout = pair.vrf_sign(transcript);
|
|
let vrf_randomness: sp_consensus_vrf::schnorrkel::Randomness = vrf_inout.0
|
|
.make_bytes::<[u8; 32]>(&sp_consensus_babe::BABE_VRF_INOUT_CONTEXT);
|
|
let vrf_output = VRFOutput(vrf_inout.0.to_output());
|
|
let vrf_proof = VRFProof(vrf_inout.1);
|
|
|
|
let first_vrf = vrf_output;
|
|
let pre_digest = make_pre_digest(
|
|
0,
|
|
genesis_slot,
|
|
first_vrf.clone(),
|
|
vrf_proof,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::genesis_slot(), 0);
|
|
System::initialize(
|
|
&1,
|
|
&Default::default(),
|
|
&Default::default(),
|
|
&pre_digest,
|
|
Default::default(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// see implementation of the function for details why: we issue an
|
|
// epoch-change digest but don't do it via the normal session mechanism.
|
|
assert!(!Babe::should_end_session(1));
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::genesis_slot(), genesis_slot);
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::current_slot(), genesis_slot);
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::epoch_index(), 0);
|
|
|
|
Babe::on_finalize(1);
|
|
let header = System::finalize();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(SegmentIndex::get(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(UnderConstruction::get(0), vec![vrf_randomness]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::randomness(), [0; 32]);
|
|
assert_eq!(NextRandomness::get(), [0; 32]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(header.digest.logs.len(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(pre_digest.logs.len(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(header.digest.logs[0], pre_digest.logs[0]);
|
|
|
|
let consensus_log = sp_consensus_babe::ConsensusLog::NextEpochData(
|
|
sp_consensus_babe::digests::NextEpochDescriptor {
|
|
authorities: Babe::authorities(),
|
|
randomness: Babe::randomness(),
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
let consensus_digest = DigestItem::Consensus(BABE_ENGINE_ID, consensus_log.encode());
|
|
|
|
// first epoch descriptor has same info as last.
|
|
assert_eq!(header.digest.logs[1], consensus_digest.clone())
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn authority_index() {
|
|
new_test_ext(4).execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Babe::find_author((&[(BABE_ENGINE_ID, &[][..])]).into_iter().cloned()), None,
|
|
"Trivially invalid authorities are ignored")
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn can_predict_next_epoch_change() {
|
|
new_test_ext(1).execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Trait>::EpochDuration::get(), 3);
|
|
// this sets the genesis slot to 6;
|
|
go_to_block(1, 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::genesis_slot(), 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::current_slot(), 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::epoch_index(), 0);
|
|
|
|
progress_to_block(5);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::epoch_index(), 5 / 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::current_slot(), 10);
|
|
|
|
// next epoch change will be at
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::current_epoch_start(), 9); // next change will be 12, 2 slots from now
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::next_expected_epoch_change(System::block_number()), Some(5 + 2));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn can_enact_next_config() {
|
|
new_test_ext(1).execute_with(|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(<Test as Trait>::EpochDuration::get(), 3);
|
|
// this sets the genesis slot to 6;
|
|
go_to_block(1, 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::genesis_slot(), 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::current_slot(), 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Babe::epoch_index(), 0);
|
|
go_to_block(2, 7);
|
|
|
|
Babe::plan_config_change(NextConfigDescriptor::V1 {
|
|
c: (1, 4),
|
|
allowed_slots: AllowedSlots::PrimarySlots,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
progress_to_block(4);
|
|
Babe::on_finalize(9);
|
|
let header = System::finalize();
|
|
|
|
let consensus_log = sp_consensus_babe::ConsensusLog::NextConfigData(
|
|
sp_consensus_babe::digests::NextConfigDescriptor::V1 {
|
|
c: (1, 4),
|
|
allowed_slots: AllowedSlots::PrimarySlots,
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
let consensus_digest = DigestItem::Consensus(BABE_ENGINE_ID, consensus_log.encode());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(header.digest.logs[2], consensus_digest.clone())
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_current_session_works() {
|
|
let (pairs, mut ext) = new_test_ext_with_pairs(3);
|
|
|
|
ext.execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let authorities = Babe::authorities();
|
|
let validators = Session::validators();
|
|
|
|
// make sure that all authorities have the same balance
|
|
for validator in &validators {
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(validator), 10_000_000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(validator), 10_000);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(1, validator),
|
|
pallet_staking::Exposure {
|
|
total: 10_000,
|
|
own: 10_000,
|
|
others: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// we will use the validator at index 0 as the offending authority
|
|
let offending_validator_index = 0;
|
|
let offending_validator_id = Session::validators()[offending_validator_index];
|
|
let offending_authority_pair = pairs
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.find(|p| p.public() == authorities[offending_validator_index].0)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// generate an equivocation proof. it creates two headers at the given
|
|
// slot with different block hashes and signed by the given key
|
|
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
offending_validator_index as u32,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair,
|
|
CurrentSlot::get(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// create the key ownership proof
|
|
let key = (
|
|
sp_consensus_babe::KEY_TYPE,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair.public(),
|
|
);
|
|
let key_owner_proof = Historical::prove(key).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// report the equivocation
|
|
Babe::report_equivocation_unsigned(Origin::none(), equivocation_proof, key_owner_proof)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// start a new era so that the results of the offence report
|
|
// are applied at era end
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// check that the balance of offending validator is slashed 100%.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&offending_validator_id),
|
|
10_000_000 - 10_000
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&offending_validator_id), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(2, offending_validator_id),
|
|
pallet_staking::Exposure {
|
|
total: 0,
|
|
own: 0,
|
|
others: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// check that the balances of all other validators are left intact.
|
|
for validator in &validators {
|
|
if *validator == offending_validator_id {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(validator), 10_000_000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(validator), 10_000);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(2, validator),
|
|
pallet_staking::Exposure {
|
|
total: 10_000,
|
|
own: 10_000,
|
|
others: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_old_session_works() {
|
|
let (pairs, mut ext) = new_test_ext_with_pairs(3);
|
|
|
|
ext.execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let authorities = Babe::authorities();
|
|
|
|
// we will use the validator at index 0 as the offending authority
|
|
let offending_validator_index = 0;
|
|
let offending_validator_id = Session::validators()[offending_validator_index];
|
|
let offending_authority_pair = pairs
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.find(|p| p.public() == authorities[offending_validator_index].0)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// generate an equivocation proof at the current slot
|
|
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
offending_validator_index as u32,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair,
|
|
CurrentSlot::get(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// create the key ownership proof
|
|
let key = (
|
|
sp_consensus_babe::KEY_TYPE,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair.public(),
|
|
);
|
|
let key_owner_proof = Historical::prove(key).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// start a new era and report the equivocation
|
|
// from the previous era
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// check the balance of the offending validator
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&offending_validator_id), 10_000_000);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::slashable_balance_of(&offending_validator_id),
|
|
10_000
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// report the equivocation
|
|
Babe::report_equivocation_unsigned(Origin::none(), equivocation_proof, key_owner_proof)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// start a new era so that the results of the offence report
|
|
// are applied at era end
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// check that the balance of offending validator is slashed 100%.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Balances::total_balance(&offending_validator_id),
|
|
10_000_000 - 10_000
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slashable_balance_of(&offending_validator_id), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
Staking::eras_stakers(3, offending_validator_id),
|
|
pallet_staking::Exposure {
|
|
total: 0,
|
|
own: 0,
|
|
others: vec![],
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_invalid_key_owner_proof() {
|
|
let (pairs, mut ext) = new_test_ext_with_pairs(3);
|
|
|
|
ext.execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let authorities = Babe::authorities();
|
|
|
|
// we will use the validator at index 0 as the offending authority
|
|
let offending_validator_index = 0;
|
|
let offending_authority_pair = pairs
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.find(|p| p.public() == authorities[offending_validator_index].0)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// generate an equivocation proof at the current slot
|
|
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
offending_validator_index as u32,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair,
|
|
CurrentSlot::get(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// create the key ownership proof
|
|
let key = (
|
|
sp_consensus_babe::KEY_TYPE,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair.public(),
|
|
);
|
|
let mut key_owner_proof = Historical::prove(key).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// we change the session index in the key ownership proof
|
|
// which should make it invalid
|
|
key_owner_proof.session = 0;
|
|
assert_err!(
|
|
Babe::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
Origin::none(),
|
|
equivocation_proof.clone(),
|
|
key_owner_proof
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidKeyOwnershipProof,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// it should fail as well if we create a key owner proof
|
|
// for a different authority than the offender
|
|
let key = (sp_consensus_babe::KEY_TYPE, &authorities[1].0);
|
|
let key_owner_proof = Historical::prove(key).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// we need to progress to a new era to make sure that the key
|
|
// ownership proof is properly checked, otherwise since the state
|
|
// is still available the historical module will just check
|
|
// against current session data.
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
assert_err!(
|
|
Babe::report_equivocation_unsigned(Origin::none(), equivocation_proof, key_owner_proof),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidKeyOwnershipProof,
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_invalid_equivocation_proof() {
|
|
use sp_runtime::traits::Header;
|
|
|
|
let (pairs, mut ext) = new_test_ext_with_pairs(3);
|
|
|
|
ext.execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let authorities = Babe::authorities();
|
|
|
|
// we will use the validator at index 0 as the offending authority
|
|
let offending_validator_index = 0;
|
|
let offending_authority_pair = pairs
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.find(|p| p.public() == authorities[offending_validator_index].0)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// create the key ownership proof
|
|
let key = (
|
|
sp_consensus_babe::KEY_TYPE,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair.public(),
|
|
);
|
|
let key_owner_proof = Historical::prove(key).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let assert_invalid_equivocation = |equivocation_proof| {
|
|
assert_err!(
|
|
Babe::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
Origin::none(),
|
|
equivocation_proof,
|
|
key_owner_proof.clone(),
|
|
),
|
|
Error::<Test>::InvalidEquivocationProof,
|
|
)
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// both headers have the same hash, no equivocation.
|
|
let mut equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
offending_validator_index as u32,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair,
|
|
CurrentSlot::get(),
|
|
);
|
|
equivocation_proof.second_header = equivocation_proof.first_header.clone();
|
|
assert_invalid_equivocation(equivocation_proof);
|
|
|
|
// missing preruntime digest from one header
|
|
let mut equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
offending_validator_index as u32,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair,
|
|
CurrentSlot::get(),
|
|
);
|
|
equivocation_proof.first_header.digest_mut().logs.remove(0);
|
|
assert_invalid_equivocation(equivocation_proof);
|
|
|
|
// missing seal from one header
|
|
let mut equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
offending_validator_index as u32,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair,
|
|
CurrentSlot::get(),
|
|
);
|
|
equivocation_proof.first_header.digest_mut().logs.remove(1);
|
|
assert_invalid_equivocation(equivocation_proof);
|
|
|
|
// invalid slot number in proof compared to runtime digest
|
|
let mut equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
offending_validator_index as u32,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair,
|
|
CurrentSlot::get(),
|
|
);
|
|
equivocation_proof.slot_number = 0;
|
|
assert_invalid_equivocation(equivocation_proof.clone());
|
|
|
|
// different slot numbers in headers
|
|
let h1 = equivocation_proof.first_header;
|
|
let mut equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
offending_validator_index as u32,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair,
|
|
CurrentSlot::get() + 1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// use the header from the previous equivocation generated
|
|
// at the previous slot
|
|
equivocation_proof.first_header = h1.clone();
|
|
|
|
assert_invalid_equivocation(equivocation_proof.clone());
|
|
|
|
// invalid seal signature
|
|
let mut equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
offending_validator_index as u32,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair,
|
|
CurrentSlot::get() + 1,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// replace the seal digest with the digest from the
|
|
// previous header at the previous slot
|
|
equivocation_proof.first_header.digest_mut().pop();
|
|
equivocation_proof
|
|
.first_header
|
|
.digest_mut()
|
|
.push(h1.digest().logs().last().unwrap().clone());
|
|
|
|
assert_invalid_equivocation(equivocation_proof.clone());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_validate_unsigned_prevents_duplicates() {
|
|
use sp_runtime::transaction_validity::{
|
|
InvalidTransaction, TransactionLongevity, TransactionPriority, TransactionSource,
|
|
TransactionValidity, ValidTransaction,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
let (pairs, mut ext) = new_test_ext_with_pairs(3);
|
|
|
|
ext.execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let authorities = Babe::authorities();
|
|
|
|
// generate and report an equivocation for the validator at index 0
|
|
let offending_validator_index = 0;
|
|
let offending_authority_pair = pairs
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.find(|p| p.public() == authorities[offending_validator_index].0)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let equivocation_proof = generate_equivocation_proof(
|
|
offending_validator_index as u32,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair,
|
|
CurrentSlot::get(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let key = (
|
|
sp_consensus_babe::KEY_TYPE,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair.public(),
|
|
);
|
|
let key_owner_proof = Historical::prove(key).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let inner =
|
|
Call::report_equivocation_unsigned(equivocation_proof.clone(), key_owner_proof.clone());
|
|
|
|
// only local/inblock reports are allowed
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Babe as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
|
|
TransactionSource::External,
|
|
&inner,
|
|
),
|
|
InvalidTransaction::Call.into(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// the transaction is valid when passed as local
|
|
let tx_tag = (offending_authority_pair.public(), CurrentSlot::get());
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
<Babe as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
|
|
TransactionSource::Local,
|
|
&inner,
|
|
),
|
|
TransactionValidity::Ok(ValidTransaction {
|
|
priority: TransactionPriority::max_value(),
|
|
requires: vec![],
|
|
provides: vec![("BabeEquivocation", tx_tag).encode()],
|
|
longevity: TransactionLongevity::max_value(),
|
|
propagate: false,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// the pre dispatch checks should also pass
|
|
assert_ok!(<Babe as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::pre_dispatch(&inner));
|
|
|
|
// we submit the report
|
|
Babe::report_equivocation_unsigned(Origin::none(), equivocation_proof, key_owner_proof)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// the report should now be considered stale and the transaction is invalid
|
|
assert_err!(
|
|
<Babe as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::pre_dispatch(&inner),
|
|
InvalidTransaction::Stale,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn report_equivocation_has_valid_weight() {
|
|
// the weight depends on the size of the validator set,
|
|
// but there's a lower bound of 100 validators.
|
|
assert!(
|
|
(1..=100)
|
|
.map(<Test as Trait>::WeightInfo::report_equivocation)
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
|
|
.windows(2)
|
|
.all(|w| w[0] == w[1])
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// after 100 validators the weight should keep increasing
|
|
// with every extra validator.
|
|
assert!(
|
|
(100..=1000)
|
|
.map(<Test as Trait>::WeightInfo::report_equivocation)
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
|
|
.windows(2)
|
|
.all(|w| w[0] < w[1])
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn valid_equivocation_reports_dont_pay_fees() {
|
|
let (pairs, mut ext) = new_test_ext_with_pairs(3);
|
|
|
|
ext.execute_with(|| {
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
let offending_authority_pair = &pairs[0];
|
|
|
|
// generate an equivocation proof.
|
|
let equivocation_proof =
|
|
generate_equivocation_proof(0, &offending_authority_pair, CurrentSlot::get());
|
|
|
|
// create the key ownership proof.
|
|
let key_owner_proof = Historical::prove((
|
|
sp_consensus_babe::KEY_TYPE,
|
|
&offending_authority_pair.public(),
|
|
))
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// check the dispatch info for the call.
|
|
let info = Call::<Test>::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
equivocation_proof.clone(),
|
|
key_owner_proof.clone(),
|
|
)
|
|
.get_dispatch_info();
|
|
|
|
// it should have non-zero weight and the fee has to be paid.
|
|
assert!(info.weight > 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(info.pays_fee, Pays::Yes);
|
|
|
|
// report the equivocation.
|
|
let post_info = Babe::report_equivocation_unsigned(
|
|
Origin::none(),
|
|
equivocation_proof.clone(),
|
|
key_owner_proof.clone(),
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// the original weight should be kept, but given that the report
|
|
// is valid the fee is waived.
|
|
assert!(post_info.actual_weight.is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(post_info.pays_fee, Pays::No);
|
|
|
|
// report the equivocation again which is invalid now since it is
|
|
// duplicate.
|
|
let post_info =
|
|
Babe::report_equivocation_unsigned(Origin::none(), equivocation_proof, key_owner_proof)
|
|
.err()
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.post_info;
|
|
|
|
// the fee is not waived and the original weight is kept.
|
|
assert!(post_info.actual_weight.is_none());
|
|
assert_eq!(post_info.pays_fee, Pays::Yes);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|