mirror of
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-subxt.git
synced 2026-04-27 09:17:58 +00:00
1978 lines
69 KiB
Rust
1978 lines
69 KiB
Rust
// Copyright 2017-2019 Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
|
|
// This file is part of Substrate.
|
|
|
|
// Substrate is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
|
|
// (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
// Substrate is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
// GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
// along with Substrate. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
|
|
|
//! Tests for the module.
|
|
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
use runtime_io::with_externalities;
|
|
use phragmen;
|
|
use primitives::traits::OnInitialize;
|
|
use srml_support::{assert_ok, assert_noop, assert_eq_uvec, EnumerableStorageMap};
|
|
use mock::*;
|
|
use srml_support::traits::{Currency, ReservableCurrency};
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn basic_setup_works() {
|
|
// Verifies initial conditions of mock
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10)); // Account 11 is stashed and locked, and account 10 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&21), Some(20)); // Account 21 is stashed and locked, and account 20 is the controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&1), None); // Account 1 is not a stashed
|
|
|
|
// Account 10 controls the stash from account 11, which is 100 * balance_factor units
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger { stash: 11, total: 1000, active: 1000, unlocking: vec![] }));
|
|
// Account 20 controls the stash from account 21, which is 200 * balance_factor units
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&20), Some(StakingLedger { stash: 21, total: 1000, active: 1000, unlocking: vec![] }));
|
|
// Account 1 does not control any stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&1), None);
|
|
|
|
// ValidatorPrefs are default, thus unstake_threshold is 3, other values are default for their type
|
|
assert_eq!(<Validators<Test>>::enumerate().collect::<Vec<_>>(), vec![
|
|
(31, ValidatorPrefs { unstake_threshold: 3, validator_payment: 0 }),
|
|
(21, ValidatorPrefs { unstake_threshold: 3, validator_payment: 0 }),
|
|
(11, ValidatorPrefs { unstake_threshold: 3, validator_payment: 0 })
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
// Account 100 is the default nominator
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(100), Some(StakingLedger { stash: 101, total: 500, active: 500, unlocking: vec![] }));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::nominators(101), vec![11, 21]);
|
|
|
|
// Account 10 is exposed by 1000 * balance_factor from their own stash in account 11 + the default nominator vote
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11), Exposure { total: 1125, own: 1000, others: vec![ IndividualExposure { who: 101, value: 125 }] });
|
|
// Account 20 is exposed by 1000 * balance_factor from their own stash in account 21 + the default nominator vote
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(21), Exposure { total: 1375, own: 1000, others: vec![ IndividualExposure { who: 101, value: 375 }] });
|
|
|
|
// The number of validators required.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Initial Era and session
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// initial rewards
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), 10);
|
|
|
|
// initial slot_stake
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), 1125); // Naive
|
|
|
|
// initial slash_count of validators
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&11), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&21), 0);
|
|
|
|
// All exposures must be correct.
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn no_offline_should_work() {
|
|
// Test the staking module works when no validators are offline
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// Slashing begins for validators immediately if found offline
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::offline_slash_grace(), 0);
|
|
// Account 10 has not been reported offline
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&10), 0);
|
|
// Account 10 has `balance_factor` free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
// Nothing happens to Account 10, as expected
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&10), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
// New era is not being forced
|
|
assert!(!Staking::forcing_new_era());
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn change_controller_works() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::enumerate().map(|(c, _)| c).collect::<Vec<u64>>().contains(&11));
|
|
// 10 can control 11 who is initially a validator.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10)));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::enumerate().map(|(c, _)| c).collect::<Vec<u64>>().contains(&11));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_controller(Origin::signed(11), 5));
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(
|
|
Staking::validate(Origin::signed(10), ValidatorPrefs::default()),
|
|
"not a controller"
|
|
);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(5), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn invulnerability_should_work() {
|
|
// Test that users can be invulnerable from slashing and being kicked
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// Make account 11 invulnerable
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_invulnerables(vec![11]));
|
|
// Give account 11 some funds
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 70);
|
|
// There is no slash grace -- slash immediately.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::offline_slash_grace(), 0);
|
|
// Account 11 has not been slashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&11), 0);
|
|
// Account 11 has the 70 funds we gave it above
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 70);
|
|
// Account 11 should be a validator
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Set account 11 as an offline validator with a large number of reports
|
|
// Should exit early if invulnerable
|
|
Staking::on_offline_validator(10, 100);
|
|
|
|
// Show that account 11 has not been touched
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&11), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 70);
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
// New era not being forced
|
|
// NOTE: new era is always forced once slashing happens -> new validators need to be chosen.
|
|
assert!(!Staking::forcing_new_era());
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offline_should_slash_and_disable() {
|
|
// Test that an offline validator gets slashed and kicked
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(), || {
|
|
// Give account 10 some balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 10 is a validator
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
// Validators get slashed immediately
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::offline_slash_grace(), 0);
|
|
// Unstake threshold is 3
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validators(&11).unstake_threshold, 3);
|
|
// Account 10 has not been slashed before
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&11), 0);
|
|
// Account 10 has the funds we just gave it
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 1000);
|
|
// Account 10 is not yet disabled.
|
|
assert!(!is_disabled(10));
|
|
// Report account 10 as offline, one greater than unstake threshold
|
|
Staking::on_offline_validator(10, 4);
|
|
// Confirm user has been reported
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&11), 4);
|
|
// Confirm balance has been reduced by 2^unstake_threshold * offline_slash() * amount_at_stake.
|
|
let slash_base = Staking::offline_slash() * Staking::stakers(11).total;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 1000 - 2_u64.pow(3) * slash_base);
|
|
// Confirm account 10 has been disabled.
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(10));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn offline_grace_should_delay_slashing() {
|
|
// Tests that with grace, slashing is delayed
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(), || {
|
|
// Initialize account 10 with balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 70);
|
|
// Verify account 11 has balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 70);
|
|
|
|
// Set offline slash grace
|
|
let offline_slash_grace = 1;
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_offline_slash_grace(offline_slash_grace));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::offline_slash_grace(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Check unstake_threshold is 3 (default)
|
|
let default_unstake_threshold = 3;
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validators(&11), ValidatorPrefs { unstake_threshold: default_unstake_threshold, validator_payment: 0 });
|
|
|
|
// Check slash count is zero
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&11), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Report account 10 up to the threshold
|
|
Staking::on_offline_validator(10, default_unstake_threshold as usize + offline_slash_grace as usize);
|
|
// Confirm slash count
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&11), 4);
|
|
|
|
// Nothing should happen
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 70);
|
|
|
|
// Report account 10 one more time
|
|
Staking::on_offline_validator(10, 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&11), 5);
|
|
// User gets slashed
|
|
assert!(Balances::free_balance(&11) < 70);
|
|
// New era is forced
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(10));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn max_unstake_threshold_works() {
|
|
// Tests that max_unstake_threshold gets used when prefs.unstake_threshold is large
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(), || {
|
|
const MAX_UNSTAKE_THRESHOLD: u32 = 10;
|
|
// Two users with maximum possible balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, u64::max_value());
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&21, u64::max_value());
|
|
|
|
// Give them full exposure as a staker
|
|
<Stakers<Test>>::insert(&11, Exposure { total: 1000000, own: 1000000, others: vec![]});
|
|
<Stakers<Test>>::insert(&21, Exposure { total: 2000000, own: 2000000, others: vec![]});
|
|
|
|
// Check things are initialized correctly
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), u64::max_value());
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&21), u64::max_value());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::offline_slash_grace(), 0);
|
|
// Account 10 will have max unstake_threshold
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(10), ValidatorPrefs {
|
|
unstake_threshold: MAX_UNSTAKE_THRESHOLD,
|
|
validator_payment: 0,
|
|
}));
|
|
// Account 20 could not set their unstake_threshold past 10
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(20), ValidatorPrefs {
|
|
unstake_threshold: MAX_UNSTAKE_THRESHOLD + 1,
|
|
validator_payment: 0}),
|
|
"unstake threshold too large"
|
|
);
|
|
// Give Account 20 unstake_threshold 11 anyway, should still be limited to 10
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::insert(21, ValidatorPrefs {
|
|
unstake_threshold: MAX_UNSTAKE_THRESHOLD + 1,
|
|
validator_payment: 0,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
<OfflineSlash<Test>>::put(Perbill::from_fraction(0.0001));
|
|
|
|
// Report each user 1 more than the max_unstake_threshold
|
|
Staking::on_offline_validator(10, MAX_UNSTAKE_THRESHOLD as usize + 1);
|
|
Staking::on_offline_validator(20, MAX_UNSTAKE_THRESHOLD as usize + 1);
|
|
|
|
// Show that each balance only gets reduced by 2^max_unstake_threshold times 10%
|
|
// of their total stake.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), u64::max_value() - 2_u64.pow(MAX_UNSTAKE_THRESHOLD) * 100);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&21), u64::max_value() - 2_u64.pow(MAX_UNSTAKE_THRESHOLD) * 200);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slashing_does_not_cause_underflow() {
|
|
// Tests that slashing more than a user has does not underflow
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(), || {
|
|
// Verify initial conditions
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::offline_slash_grace(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Set validator preference so that 2^unstake_threshold would cause overflow (greater than 64)
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::insert(11, ValidatorPrefs {
|
|
unstake_threshold: 10,
|
|
validator_payment: 0,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
System::set_block_number(1);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
// Should not panic
|
|
Staking::on_offline_validator(10, 100);
|
|
// Confirm that underflow has not occurred, and account balance is set to zero
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 0);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rewards_should_work() {
|
|
// should check that:
|
|
// * rewards get recorded per session
|
|
// * rewards get paid per Era
|
|
// * Check that nominators are also rewarded
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
let delay = 1;
|
|
// this test is only in the scope of one era. Since this variable changes
|
|
// at the last block/new era, we'll save it.
|
|
let session_reward = 10;
|
|
|
|
// Set payee to controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Initial config should be correct
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), 10);
|
|
|
|
// check the balance of a validator accounts.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), 1000);
|
|
// and the nominator (to-be)
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&2, 500);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 500);
|
|
|
|
// add a dummy nominator.
|
|
<Stakers<Test>>::insert(&11, Exposure {
|
|
own: 500, // equal division indicates that the reward will be equally divided among validator and nominator.
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![IndividualExposure {who: 2, value: 500 }]
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&2, RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(2), RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(11), RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
let mut block = 3; // Block 3 => Session 1 => Era 0
|
|
System::set_block_number(block);
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(block*5); // on time.
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// session triggered: the reward value stashed should be 10 -- defined in ExtBuilder genesis.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), session_reward);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era_reward(), session_reward);
|
|
|
|
block = 6; // Block 6 => Session 2 => Era 0
|
|
System::set_block_number(block);
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(block*5 + delay); // a little late.
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// session reward is the same,
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), session_reward);
|
|
// though 2 will be deducted while stashed in the era reward due to delay
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era_reward(), 2*session_reward); // - delay);
|
|
|
|
block = 9; // Block 9 => Session 3 => Era 1
|
|
System::set_block_number(block);
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(block*5); // back to being on time. no delays
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 1 + (3*session_reward)/2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 500 + (3*session_reward)/2);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn multi_era_reward_should_work() {
|
|
// Should check that:
|
|
// The value of current_session_reward is set at the end of each era, based on
|
|
// slot_stake and session_reward.
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
let session_reward = 10;
|
|
|
|
// This is set by the test config builder.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), session_reward);
|
|
|
|
// check the balance of a validator accounts.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Set payee to controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
|
|
// session triggered: the reward value stashed should be 10
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), session_reward);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era_reward(), session_reward);
|
|
|
|
start_session(2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), session_reward);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era_reward(), 2*session_reward);
|
|
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
|
|
// 1 + sum of of the session rewards accumulated
|
|
let recorded_balance = 1 + 3*session_reward;
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), recorded_balance);
|
|
|
|
// the reward for next era will be: session_reward * slot_stake
|
|
let new_session_reward = Staking::session_reward() * Staking::slot_stake();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), new_session_reward);
|
|
|
|
// fast forward to next era:
|
|
start_session(5);
|
|
|
|
// intermediate test.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era_reward(), 2*new_session_reward);
|
|
|
|
// new era is triggered here.
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
|
|
// pay time
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 3*new_session_reward + recorded_balance);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn staking_should_work() {
|
|
// should test:
|
|
// * new validators can be added to the default set
|
|
// * new ones will be chosen per era
|
|
// * either one can unlock the stash and back-down from being a validator via `chill`ing.
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.fair(false) // to give 20 more staked value
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// remember + compare this along with the test.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..5 { let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&i, 2000); }
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 1:
|
|
System::set_block_number(1);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// add a new candidate for being a validator. account 3 controlled by 4.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 1500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(4), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
// No effects will be seen so far.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 2:
|
|
System::set_block_number(2);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// No effects will be seen so far. Era has not been yet triggered.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 3: the validators will now change.
|
|
System::set_block_number(3);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
// 2 only voted for 4 and 20
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::validators().len(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 4]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 4: Unstake 4 as a validator, freeing up the balance stashed in 3
|
|
System::set_block_number(4);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
// 4 will chill
|
|
Staking::chill(Origin::signed(4)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// nothing should be changed so far.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 4]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 5: nothing. 4 is still there.
|
|
System::set_block_number(5);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 4]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
// --- Block 6: 4 will not be a validator.
|
|
System::set_block_number(6);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::validators().contains(&4), false);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// Note: the stashed value of 4 is still lock
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&4), Some(StakingLedger { stash: 3, total: 1500, active: 1500, unlocking: vec![] }));
|
|
// e.g. it cannot spend more than 500 that it has free from the total 2000
|
|
assert_noop!(Balances::reserve(&3, 501), "account liquidity restrictions prevent withdrawal");
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&3, 409));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn less_than_needed_candidates_works() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(4)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::minimum_validator_count(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![30, 20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Previous set is selected. NO election algorithm is even executed.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![30, 20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// But the exposure is updated in a simple way. No external votes exists. This is purely self-vote.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(10).others.len(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(20).others.len(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(30).others.len(), 0);
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn no_candidate_emergency_condition() {
|
|
// Test the situation where the number of validators are less than `ValidatorCount` and less than <MinValidators>
|
|
// The expected behavior is to choose all candidates from the previous era.
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(10)
|
|
.validator_count(15)
|
|
.validator_pool(true)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 15);
|
|
|
|
// initial validators
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![10, 20, 30, 40]);
|
|
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
|
|
// trigger era
|
|
System::set_block_number(1);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
// Previous ones are elected. chill is invalidates. TODO: #2494
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![10, 20, 30, 40]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_elected().len(), 0);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn nominating_and_rewards_should_work() {
|
|
// PHRAGMEN OUTPUT: running this test with the reference impl gives:
|
|
//
|
|
// Votes [('10', 1000, ['10']), ('20', 1000, ['20']), ('30', 1000, ['30']), ('40', 1000, ['40']), ('2', 1000, ['10', '20', '30']), ('4', 1000, ['10', '20', '40'])]
|
|
// Sequential Phragmén gives
|
|
// 10 is elected with stake 2200.0 and score 0.0003333333333333333
|
|
// 20 is elected with stake 1800.0 and score 0.0005555555555555556
|
|
|
|
// 10 has load 0.0003333333333333333 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 20 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 20 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 30 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 30 with stake 0
|
|
// 40 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 40 with stake 0
|
|
// 2 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 600.0 20 with stake 400.0 30 with stake 0.0
|
|
// 4 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 600.0 20 with stake 400.0 40 with stake 0.0
|
|
|
|
// Sequential Phragmén with post processing gives
|
|
// 10 is elected with stake 2000.0 and score 0.0003333333333333333
|
|
// 20 is elected with stake 2000.0 and score 0.0005555555555555556
|
|
|
|
// 10 has load 0.0003333333333333333 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 20 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 20 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 30 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 30 with stake 0
|
|
// 40 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 40 with stake 0
|
|
// 2 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 400.0 20 with stake 600.0 30 with stake 0
|
|
// 4 has load 0.0005555555555555556 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 600.0 20 with stake 400.0 40 with stake 0.0
|
|
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.validator_pool(true)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// initial validators -- everyone is actually even.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![40, 30]);
|
|
|
|
// Set payee to controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(20), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(30), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(40), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// default reward for the first session.
|
|
let session_reward = 10;
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), session_reward);
|
|
|
|
// give the man some money
|
|
let initial_balance = 1000;
|
|
for i in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 20, 21].iter() {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(i, initial_balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// bond two account pairs and state interest in nomination.
|
|
// 2 will nominate for 10, 20, 30
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![11, 21, 31]));
|
|
// 4 will nominate for 10, 20, 40
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![11, 21, 41]));
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// 10 and 20 have more votes, they will be chosen by phragmen.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// OLD validators must have already received some rewards.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&40), 1 + 3 * session_reward);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&30), 1 + 3 * session_reward);
|
|
|
|
// ------ check the staked value of all parties.
|
|
|
|
// total expo of 10, with 1200 coming from nominators (externals), according to phragmen.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11).own, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11).total, 1000 + 800);
|
|
// 2 and 4 supported 10, each with stake 600, according to phragmen.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11).others.iter().map(|e| e.value).collect::<Vec<BalanceOf<Test>>>(), vec![400, 400]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11).others.iter().map(|e| e.who).collect::<Vec<BalanceOf<Test>>>(), vec![3, 1]);
|
|
// total expo of 20, with 500 coming from nominators (externals), according to phragmen.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(21).own, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(21).total, 1000 + 1198);
|
|
// 2 and 4 supported 20, each with stake 250, according to phragmen.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(21).others.iter().map(|e| e.value).collect::<Vec<BalanceOf<Test>>>(), vec![599, 599]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(21).others.iter().map(|e| e.who).collect::<Vec<BalanceOf<Test>>>(), vec![3, 1]);
|
|
|
|
// They are not chosen anymore
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(31).total, 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(41).total, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
// next session reward.
|
|
let new_session_reward = Staking::session_reward() * 3 * Staking::slot_stake();
|
|
// nothing else will happen, era ends and rewards are paid again,
|
|
// it is expected that nominators will also be paid. See below
|
|
|
|
// Nominator 2: has [400/1800 ~ 2/9 from 10] + [600/2200 ~ 3/11 from 20]'s reward. ==> 2/9 + 3/11
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), initial_balance + (2*new_session_reward/9 + 3*new_session_reward/11) - 1);
|
|
// Nominator 4: has [400/1800 ~ 2/9 from 10] + [600/2200 ~ 3/11 from 20]'s reward. ==> 2/9 + 3/11
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&4), initial_balance + (2*new_session_reward/9 + 3*new_session_reward/11) - 1);
|
|
|
|
// 10 got 800 / 1800 external stake => 8/18 =? 4/9 => Validator's share = 5/9
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), initial_balance + 5*new_session_reward/9);
|
|
// 10 got 1200 / 2200 external stake => 12/22 =? 6/11 => Validator's share = 5/11
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&20), initial_balance + 5*new_session_reward/11+ 2);
|
|
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn nominators_also_get_slashed() {
|
|
// A nominator should be slashed if the validator they nominated is slashed
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build(), || {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
// slash happens immediately.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::offline_slash_grace(), 0);
|
|
// Account 10 has not been reported offline
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&10), 0);
|
|
<OfflineSlash<Test>>::put(Perbill::from_percent(12));
|
|
|
|
// Set payee to controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// give the man some money.
|
|
let initial_balance = 1000;
|
|
for i in [1, 2, 3, 10].iter() {
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(i, initial_balance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 2 will nominate for 10
|
|
let nominator_stake = 500;
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, nominator_stake, RewardDestination::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![20, 10]));
|
|
|
|
// new era, pay rewards,
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Nominator stash didn't collect any.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), initial_balance);
|
|
|
|
// 10 goes offline
|
|
Staking::on_offline_validator(10, 4);
|
|
let expo = Staking::stakers(10);
|
|
let slash_value = Staking::offline_slash() * expo.total * 2_u64.pow(3);
|
|
let total_slash = expo.total.min(slash_value);
|
|
let validator_slash = expo.own.min(total_slash);
|
|
let nominator_slash = nominator_stake.min(total_slash - validator_slash);
|
|
|
|
// initial + first era reward + slash
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), initial_balance + 30 - validator_slash);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), initial_balance - nominator_slash);
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
// Because slashing happened.
|
|
assert!(is_disabled(10));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn double_staking_should_fail() {
|
|
// should test (in the same order):
|
|
// * an account already bonded as stash cannot be be stashed again.
|
|
// * an account already bonded as stash cannot nominate.
|
|
// * an account already bonded as controller can nominate.
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
let arbitrary_value = 5;
|
|
// 2 = controller, 1 stashed => ok
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, arbitrary_value, RewardDestination::default()));
|
|
// 4 = not used so far, 1 stashed => not allowed.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 4, arbitrary_value, RewardDestination::default()), "stash already bonded");
|
|
// 1 = stashed => attempting to nominate should fail.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(1), vec![1]), "not a controller");
|
|
// 2 = controller => nominating should work.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![1]));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn double_controlling_should_fail() {
|
|
// should test (in the same order):
|
|
// * an account already bonded as controller CANNOT be reused as the controller of another account.
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
let arbitrary_value = 5;
|
|
// 2 = controller, 1 stashed => ok
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, arbitrary_value, RewardDestination::default()));
|
|
// 2 = controller, 3 stashed (Note that 2 is reused.) => no-op
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 2, arbitrary_value, RewardDestination::default()), "controller already paired");
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn session_and_eras_work() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Block 1: No change.
|
|
start_session(1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Block 2: Simple era change.
|
|
start_session(3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Block 3: Schedule an era length change; no visible changes.
|
|
start_session(4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 4);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Block 4: Era change kicks in.
|
|
start_session(6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 6);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Block 5: No change.
|
|
start_session(7);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 7);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Block 6: No change.
|
|
start_session(8);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 8);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Block 7: Era increment.
|
|
start_session(9);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 9);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 3);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_transfer_staked_balance() {
|
|
// Tests that a stash account cannot transfer funds
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build(), || {
|
|
// Confirm account 11 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Confirm account 11 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 (via controller 10) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11).total, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 cannot transfer as a result
|
|
assert_noop!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 20, 1), "account liquidity restrictions prevent withdrawal");
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 extra free balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 10000);
|
|
// Confirm that account 11 can now transfer some balance
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(11), 20, 1));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_transfer_staked_balance_2() {
|
|
// Tests that a stash account cannot transfer funds
|
|
// Same test as above but with 20, and more accurate.
|
|
// 21 has 2000 free balance but 1000 at stake
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.fair(true)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// Confirm account 21 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&21), Some(20));
|
|
// Confirm account 21 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&21), 2000);
|
|
// Confirm account 21 (via controller 20) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&21).total, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 21 can transfer at most 1000
|
|
assert_noop!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(21), 20, 1001), "account liquidity restrictions prevent withdrawal");
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::transfer(Origin::signed(21), 20, 1000));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn cannot_reserve_staked_balance() {
|
|
// Checks that a bonded account cannot reserve balance from free balance
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(), || {
|
|
// Confirm account 11 is stashed
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Confirm account 11 has some free balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 (via controller 10) is totally staked
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11).own, 1000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 cannot transfer as a result
|
|
assert_noop!(Balances::reserve(&11, 1), "account liquidity restrictions prevent withdrawal");
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 extra free balance
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 10000);
|
|
// Confirm account 11 can now reserve balance
|
|
assert_ok!(Balances::reserve(&11, 1));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn reward_destination_works() {
|
|
// Rewards go to the correct destination as determined in Payee
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build(), || {
|
|
// Check that account 11 is a validator
|
|
assert!(Staking::current_elected().contains(&11));
|
|
// Check the balance of the validator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 1000);
|
|
// Check how much is at stake
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
// Check current session reward is 10
|
|
let session_reward0 = 3 * Staking::current_session_reward(); // 10
|
|
|
|
// Move forward the system for payment
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(5);
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Staked (default)
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Staked);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the stash account of validator
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 1000 + session_reward0);
|
|
// Check that amount at stake increased accordingly
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + session_reward0,
|
|
active: 1000 + session_reward0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
// Update current session reward
|
|
let session_reward1 = 3 * Staking::current_session_reward(); // 1010 (1* slot_stake)
|
|
|
|
//Change RewardDestination to Stash
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
|
|
// Move forward the system for payment
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(10);
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 1000 + session_reward0 + session_reward1);
|
|
// Record this value
|
|
let recorded_stash_balance = 1000 + session_reward0 + session_reward1;
|
|
// Check that amount at stake is NOT increased
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + session_reward0,
|
|
active: 1000 + session_reward0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Change RewardDestination to Controller
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&11, RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
|
|
// Check controller balance
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Move forward the system for payment
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(15);
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
let session_reward2 = 3 * Staking::current_session_reward(); // 1010 (1* slot_stake)
|
|
|
|
// Check that RewardDestination is Controller
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::payee(&11), RewardDestination::Controller);
|
|
// Check that reward went to the controller account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&10), 1 + session_reward2);
|
|
// Check that amount at stake is NOT increased
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + session_reward0,
|
|
active: 1000 + session_reward0,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
// Check that amount in staked account is NOT increased.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), recorded_stash_balance);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn validator_payment_prefs_work() {
|
|
// Test that validator preferences are correctly honored
|
|
// Note: unstake threshold is being directly tested in slashing tests.
|
|
// This test will focus on validator payment.
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// Initial config
|
|
let session_reward = 10;
|
|
let validator_cut = 5;
|
|
let stash_initial_balance = Balances::total_balance(&11);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), session_reward);
|
|
|
|
// check the balance of a validator accounts.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
// check the balance of a validator's stash accounts.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), stash_initial_balance);
|
|
// and the nominator (to-be)
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&2, 500);
|
|
|
|
// add a dummy nominator.
|
|
<Stakers<Test>>::insert(&11, Exposure {
|
|
own: 500, // equal division indicates that the reward will be equally divided among validator and nominator.
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
others: vec![IndividualExposure {who: 2, value: 500 }]
|
|
});
|
|
<Payee<Test>>::insert(&2, RewardDestination::Stash);
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::insert(&11, ValidatorPrefs {
|
|
unstake_threshold: 3,
|
|
validator_payment: validator_cut
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ------------ Fast forward
|
|
// Block 3 => Session 1 => Era 0
|
|
let mut block = 3;
|
|
System::set_block_number(block);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// session triggered: the reward value stashed should be 10 -- defined in ExtBuilder genesis.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), session_reward);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era_reward(), session_reward);
|
|
|
|
block = 6; // Block 6 => Session 2 => Era 0
|
|
System::set_block_number(block);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), session_reward);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era_reward(), 2*session_reward);
|
|
|
|
block = 9; // Block 9 => Session 3 => Era 1
|
|
System::set_block_number(block);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 3);
|
|
|
|
// whats left to be shared is the sum of 3 rounds minus the validator's cut.
|
|
let shared_cut = 3 * session_reward - validator_cut;
|
|
// Validator's payee is Staked account, 11, reward will be paid here.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), stash_initial_balance + shared_cut/2 + validator_cut);
|
|
// Controller account will not get any reward.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
// Rest of the reward will be shared and paid to the nominator in stake.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&2), 500 + shared_cut/2);
|
|
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_extra_works() {
|
|
// Tests that extra `free_balance` in the stash can be added to stake
|
|
// NOTE: this tests only verifies `StakingLedger` for correct updates
|
|
// See `bond_extra_and_withdraw_unbonded_works` for more details and updates on `Exposure`.
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// Check that account 10 is a validator
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(11));
|
|
// Check that account 10 is bonded to account 11
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
// Check how much is at stake
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// Call the bond_extra function from controller, add only 100
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(11), 100));
|
|
// There should be 100 more `total` and `active` in the ledger
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Call the bond_extra function with a large number, should handle it
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(11), u64::max_value()));
|
|
// The full amount of the funds should now be in the total and active
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000000,
|
|
active: 1000000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_extra_and_withdraw_unbonded_works() {
|
|
// * Should test
|
|
// * Given an account being bonded [and chosen as a validator](not mandatory)
|
|
// * It can add extra funds to the bonded account.
|
|
// * it can unbond a portion of its funds from the stash account.
|
|
// * Once the unbonding period is done, it can actually take the funds out of the stash.
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// Set payee to controller. avoids confusion
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// Give account 11 some large free balance greater than total
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&11, 1000000);
|
|
|
|
// Initial config should be correct
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::current_index(), 0);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_session_reward(), 10);
|
|
|
|
// check the balance of a validator accounts.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 1);
|
|
|
|
// confirm that 10 is a normal validator and gets paid at the end of the era.
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Initial state of 10
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
active: 1000,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11), Exposure { total: 1000, own: 1000, others: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// deposit the extra 100 units
|
|
Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(11), 100).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
// Exposure is a snapshot! only updated after the next era update.
|
|
assert_ne!(Staking::stakers(&11), Exposure { total: 1000 + 100, own: 1000 + 100, others: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
Timestamp::set_timestamp(10);
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::current_era(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// ledger should be the same.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11,
|
|
total: 1000 + 100,
|
|
active: 1000 + 100,
|
|
unlocking: vec![],
|
|
}));
|
|
// Exposure is now updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11), Exposure { total: 1000 + 100, own: 1000 + 100, others: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// Unbond almost all of the funds in stash.
|
|
Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1000).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11, total: 1000 + 100, active: 100, unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk{ value: 1000, era: 2 + 3}] })
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Attempting to free the balances now will fail. 2 eras need to pass.
|
|
Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10)).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11, total: 1000 + 100, active: 100, unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk{ value: 1000, era: 2 + 3}] }));
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
// nothing yet
|
|
Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10)).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11, total: 1000 + 100, active: 100, unlocking: vec![UnlockChunk{ value: 1000, era: 2 + 3}] }));
|
|
|
|
// trigger next era.
|
|
start_era(5);
|
|
|
|
Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10)).unwrap();
|
|
// Now the value is free and the staking ledger is updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10), Some(StakingLedger {
|
|
stash: 11, total: 100, active: 100, unlocking: vec![] }));
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn too_many_unbond_calls_should_not_work() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().build(), || {
|
|
// locked at era 0 until 3
|
|
for _ in 0..MAX_UNLOCKING_CHUNKS-1 {
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// locked at era 1 until 4
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
// can't do more.
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1), "can not schedule more unlock chunks");
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_noop!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1), "can not schedule more unlock chunks");
|
|
// free up.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::withdraw_unbonded(Origin::signed(10)));
|
|
|
|
// Can add again.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::unbond(Origin::signed(10), 1));
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::ledger(&10).unwrap().unlocking.len(), 2);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn slot_stake_is_least_staked_validator_and_exposure_defines_maximum_punishment() {
|
|
// Test that slot_stake is determined by the least staked validator
|
|
// Test that slot_stake is the maximum punishment that can happen to a validator
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.fair(false)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// Confirm validator count is 2
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 2);
|
|
// Confirm account 10 and 20 are validators
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11) && <Validators<Test>>::exists(&21));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11).total, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&21).total, 2000);
|
|
|
|
// Give the man some money.
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&10, 1000);
|
|
let _ = Balances::make_free_balance_be(&20, 1000);
|
|
|
|
// We confirm initialized slot_stake is this value
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), Staking::stakers(&11).total);
|
|
|
|
// Now lets lower account 20 stake
|
|
<Stakers<Test>>::insert(&21, Exposure { total: 69, own: 69, others: vec![] });
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&21).total, 69);
|
|
<Ledger<Test>>::insert(&20, StakingLedger { stash: 22, total: 69, active: 69, unlocking: vec![] });
|
|
|
|
// New era --> rewards are paid --> stakes are changed
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// -- new balances + reward
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&11).total, 1000 + 30);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(&21).total, 69 + 30);
|
|
|
|
// -- slot stake should also be updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), 69 + 30);
|
|
|
|
// If 10 gets slashed now, it will be slashed by 5% of exposure.total * 2.pow(unstake_thresh)
|
|
Staking::on_offline_validator(10, 4);
|
|
// Confirm user has been reported
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slash_count(&11), 4);
|
|
// check the balance of 10 (slash will be deducted from free balance.)
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 1000 + 30 - 51 /*5% of 1030*/ * 8 /*2**3*/);
|
|
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn on_free_balance_zero_stash_removes_validator() {
|
|
// Tests that validator storage items are cleaned up when stash is empty
|
|
// Tests that storage items are untouched when controller is empty
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(10)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// Check the balance of the validator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&10), 256);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 256000);
|
|
// Check these two accounts are bonded
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// Set some storage items which we expect to be cleaned up
|
|
// Initiate slash count storage item
|
|
Staking::on_offline_validator(10, 1);
|
|
// Set payee information
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Stash));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items that should be cleaned up
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::exists(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<SlashCount<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of controller to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&10, u64::max_value());
|
|
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account has not been touched
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 256000);
|
|
// Check these two accounts are still bonded
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items have not changed
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::exists(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<SlashCount<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of stash to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&11, u64::max_value());
|
|
// Check total balance of stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items do not exist
|
|
assert!(!<Ledger<Test>>::exists(&10));
|
|
assert!(!<Bonded<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Nominators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<SlashCount<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Payee<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn on_free_balance_zero_stash_removes_nominator() {
|
|
// Tests that nominator storage items are cleaned up when stash is empty
|
|
// Tests that storage items are untouched when controller is empty
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.existential_deposit(10)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// Make 10 a nominator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(10), vec![20]));
|
|
// Check that account 10 is a nominator
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::exists(11));
|
|
// Check the balance of the nominator account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&10), 256);
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 256000);
|
|
|
|
// Set payee information
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Stash));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items that should be cleaned up
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::exists(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of controller to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&10, u64::max_value());
|
|
// Check total balance of account 10
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&10), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Check the balance of the stash account has not been touched
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&11), 256000);
|
|
// Check these two accounts are still bonded
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::bonded(&11), Some(10));
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items have not changed
|
|
assert!(<Ledger<Test>>::exists(&10));
|
|
assert!(<Bonded<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Nominators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(<Payee<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
|
|
// Reduce free_balance of stash to 0
|
|
let _ = Balances::slash(&11, u64::max_value());
|
|
// Check total balance of stash
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::total_balance(&11), 0);
|
|
|
|
// Check storage items do not exist
|
|
assert!(!<Ledger<Test>>::exists(&10));
|
|
assert!(!<Bonded<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Validators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Nominators<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<SlashCount<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
assert!(!<Payee<Test>>::exists(&11));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_poc_works() {
|
|
// Tests the POC test of the phragmen, mentioned in the paper and reference implementation.
|
|
// Initial votes:
|
|
// Votes [
|
|
// ('2', 500, ['10', '20', '30']),
|
|
// ('4', 500, ['10', '20', '40']),
|
|
// ('10', 1000, ['10']),
|
|
// ('20', 1000, ['20']),
|
|
// ('30', 1000, ['30']),
|
|
// ('40', 1000, ['40'])]
|
|
//
|
|
// Sequential Phragmén gives
|
|
// 10 is elected with stake 1666.6666666666665 and score 0.0005
|
|
// 20 is elected with stake 1333.3333333333333 and score 0.00075
|
|
|
|
// 2 has load 0.00075 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 333.3333333333333 20 with stake 166.66666666666666 30 with stake 0.0
|
|
// 4 has load 0.00075 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 333.3333333333333 20 with stake 166.66666666666666 40 with stake 0.0
|
|
// 10 has load 0.0005 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 20 has load 0.00075 and supported
|
|
// 20 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 30 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 30 with stake 0
|
|
// 40 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 40 with stake 0
|
|
|
|
// Sequential Phragmén with post processing gives
|
|
// 10 is elected with stake 1500.0 and score 0.0005
|
|
// 20 is elected with stake 1500.0 and score 0.00075
|
|
//
|
|
// 10 has load 0.0005 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 20 has load 0.00075 and supported
|
|
// 20 with stake 1000.0
|
|
// 30 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 30 with stake 0
|
|
// 40 has load 0 and supported
|
|
// 40 with stake 0
|
|
// 2 has load 0.00075 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 166.66666666666674 20 with stake 333.33333333333326 30 with stake 0
|
|
// 4 has load 0.00075 and supported
|
|
// 10 with stake 333.3333333333333 20 with stake 166.66666666666666 40 with stake 0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.validator_pool(true)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// We don't really care about this. At this point everything is even.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![40, 30]);
|
|
|
|
// Set payees to Controller
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(20), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(30), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(40), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
|
|
// no one is a nominator
|
|
assert_eq!(<Nominators<Test>>::enumerate().count(), 0 as usize);
|
|
|
|
// bond [2,1] / [4,3] a nominator
|
|
let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&1, 1000);
|
|
let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&3, 1000);
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 500, RewardDestination::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![11, 21, 31]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 500, RewardDestination::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![11, 21, 41]));
|
|
|
|
// New era => election algorithm will trigger
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// with stake 1666 and 1333 respectively
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11).own, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11).total, 1000 + 332);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(21).own, 1000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(21).total, 1000 + 666);
|
|
|
|
// Nominator's stake distribution.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11).others.iter().map(|e| e.value).collect::<Vec<BalanceOf<Test>>>(), vec![166, 166]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11).others.iter().map(|e| e.value).sum::<BalanceOf<Test>>(), 332);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11).others.iter().map(|e| e.who).collect::<Vec<BalanceOf<Test>>>(), vec![3, 1]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(21).others.iter().map(|e| e.value).collect::<Vec<BalanceOf<Test>>>(), vec![333, 333]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(21).others.iter().map(|e| e.value).sum::<BalanceOf<Test>>(), 666);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(21).others.iter().map(|e| e.who).collect::<Vec<BalanceOf<Test>>>(), vec![3, 1]);
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_poc_2_works() {
|
|
// tests the encapsulated phragmen::elect function.
|
|
// Votes [
|
|
// ('10', 1000, ['10']),
|
|
// ('20', 1000, ['20']),
|
|
// ('30', 1000, ['30']),
|
|
// ('2', 50, ['10', '20']),
|
|
// ('4', 1000, ['10', '30'])
|
|
// ]
|
|
// Sequential Phragmén gives
|
|
// 10 is elected with stake 1705.7377049180327 and score 0.0004878048780487805
|
|
// 30 is elected with stake 1344.2622950819673 and score 0.0007439024390243903
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default().nominate(false).build(), || {
|
|
// initial setup of 10 and 20, both validators
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// Bond [30, 31] as the third validator
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond_extra(Origin::signed(31), 999));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(30), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
// bond [2,1](A), [4,3](B), as 2 nominators
|
|
for i in &[1, 3] { let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(i, 2000); }
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 50, RewardDestination::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![11, 21]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 1000, RewardDestination::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![11, 31]));
|
|
|
|
let winners = phragmen::elect::<Test, _, _, _>(
|
|
2,
|
|
Staking::minimum_validator_count() as usize,
|
|
<Validators<Test>>::enumerate(),
|
|
<Nominators<Test>>::enumerate(),
|
|
Staking::slashable_balance_of,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let (winners, assignment) = winners.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// 10 and 30 must be the winners
|
|
assert_eq!(winners, vec![11, 31]);
|
|
assert_eq!(assignment, vec![
|
|
(3, vec![(11, 2816371998), (31, 1478595298)]),
|
|
(1, vec![(11, 4294967296)]),
|
|
]);
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn switching_roles() {
|
|
// Test that it should be possible to switch between roles (nominator, validator, idle) with minimal overhead.
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
// Reset reward destination
|
|
for i in &[10, 20] { assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(*i), RewardDestination::Controller)); }
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..7 { let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&i, 5000); }
|
|
|
|
// add 2 nominators
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 2000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![11, 5]));
|
|
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![21, 1]));
|
|
|
|
// add a new validator candidate
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(5), 6, 1000, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(6), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
// new block
|
|
System::set_block_number(1);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
// no change
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// new block
|
|
System::set_block_number(2);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
// no change
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// new block --> ne era --> new validators
|
|
System::set_block_number(3);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
// with current nominators 10 and 5 have the most stake
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![6, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// 2 decides to be a validator. Consequences:
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(2), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
// new stakes:
|
|
// 10: 1000 self vote
|
|
// 20: 1000 self vote + 500 vote
|
|
// 6 : 1000 self vote
|
|
// 2 : 2000 self vote + 500 vote.
|
|
// Winners: 20 and 2
|
|
|
|
System::set_block_number(4);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![6, 10]);
|
|
|
|
System::set_block_number(5);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![6, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// ne era
|
|
System::set_block_number(6);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![2, 20]);
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn wrong_vote_is_null() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.validator_pool(true)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![40, 30]);
|
|
|
|
// put some money in account that we'll use.
|
|
for i in 1..3 { let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&i, 5000); }
|
|
|
|
// add 1 nominators
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 2000, RewardDestination::default()));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(2), vec![
|
|
11, 21, // good votes
|
|
1, 2, 15, 1000, 25 // crap votes. No effect.
|
|
]));
|
|
|
|
// new block
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10]);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_no_staked_value() {
|
|
// Behavior when someone bonds with no staked value.
|
|
// Particularly when she votes and the candidate is elected.
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(3)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.build(), || {
|
|
// setup
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
let _ = Balances::deposit_creating(&3, 1000);
|
|
let initial_balance_2 = Balances::free_balance(&2);
|
|
let initial_balance_4 = Balances::free_balance(&4);
|
|
|
|
// Stingy validator.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(2), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![30, 20, 10]);
|
|
|
|
// min of 10, 20 and 30 (30 got a payout into staking so it raised it from 1 to 31).
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), 31);
|
|
|
|
// make the stingy one elected.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(3), 4, 500, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::nominate(Origin::signed(4), vec![1]));
|
|
|
|
// no rewards paid to 2 and 4 yet
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&2), initial_balance_2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&4), initial_balance_4);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
// Stingy one is selected
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10, 2]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(1), Exposure {
|
|
own: 1,
|
|
total: 501,
|
|
others: vec![IndividualExposure { who: 3, value: 500}],
|
|
});
|
|
// New slot stake.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), 501);
|
|
|
|
// no rewards paid to 2 and 4 yet
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&2), initial_balance_2);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&4), initial_balance_4);
|
|
|
|
start_era(3);
|
|
|
|
let reward = Staking::current_session_reward() * 3;
|
|
// 2 will not get a reward of only 1
|
|
// 4 will get the rest
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&2), initial_balance_2 + 3);
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&4), initial_balance_4 + reward - 3);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn bond_with_little_staked_value_bounded_by_slot_stake() {
|
|
// Behavior when someone bonds with little staked value.
|
|
// Particularly when she votes and the candidate is elected.
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.validator_count(3)
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
|
|
// setup
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::chill(Origin::signed(30)));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(10), RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
let initial_balance_2 = Balances::free_balance(&2);
|
|
let initial_balance_10 = Balances::free_balance(&10);
|
|
|
|
// Stingy validator.
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::bond(Origin::signed(1), 2, 1, RewardDestination::Controller));
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(2), ValidatorPrefs::default()));
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// 2 is elected.
|
|
// and fucks up the slot stake.
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10, 2]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Old ones are rewarded.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&10), initial_balance_10 + 30);
|
|
// no rewards paid to 2. This was initial election.
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&2), initial_balance_2);
|
|
|
|
start_era(2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![20, 10, 2]);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::slot_stake(), 1);
|
|
|
|
let reward = Staking::current_session_reward();
|
|
// 2 will not get the full reward, practically 1
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&2), initial_balance_2 + reward.max(3));
|
|
// same for 10
|
|
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(&10), initial_balance_10 + 30 + reward.max(3));
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
#[ignore] // Enable this once post-processing is on.
|
|
fn phragmen_linear_worse_case_equalize() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.validator_pool(true)
|
|
.fair(true)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
for i in &[10, 20, 30, 40] { assert_ok!(Staking::set_payee(Origin::signed(*i), RewardDestination::Controller)); }
|
|
|
|
bond_validator(50, 1000);
|
|
bond_validator(60, 1000);
|
|
bond_validator(70, 1000);
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(2, 2000, vec![11]);
|
|
bond_nominator(4, 1000, vec![11, 21]);
|
|
bond_nominator(6, 1000, vec![21, 31]);
|
|
bond_nominator(8, 1000, vec![31, 41]);
|
|
bond_nominator(110, 1000, vec![41, 51]);
|
|
bond_nominator(120, 1000, vec![51, 61]);
|
|
bond_nominator(130, 1000, vec![61, 71]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![40, 30]);
|
|
assert_ok!(Staking::set_validator_count(7));
|
|
|
|
System::set_block_number(1);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![10, 60, 40, 20, 50, 30, 70]);
|
|
|
|
// Sequential Phragmén with post processing gives
|
|
// 10 is elected with stake 3000.0 and score 0.00025
|
|
// 20 is elected with stake 2017.7421569824219 and score 0.0005277777777777777
|
|
// 30 is elected with stake 2008.8712884829595 and score 0.0003333333333333333
|
|
// 40 is elected with stake 2000.0001049958742 and score 0.0005555555555555556
|
|
// 50 is elected with stake 2000.0001049958742 and score 0.0003333333333333333
|
|
// 60 is elected with stake 1991.128921508789 and score 0.0004444444444444444
|
|
// 70 is elected with stake 1982.2574230340813 and score 0.0007222222222222222
|
|
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(11).total, 3000);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(21).total, 2209);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(31).total, 2027);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(41).total, 2010);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(51).total, 2010);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(61).total, 1998);
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(71).total, 1983);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_chooses_correct_number_of_validators() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(true)
|
|
.validator_pool(true)
|
|
.fair(true)
|
|
.validator_count(1)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::validator_count(), 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::validators().len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
System::set_block_number(1);
|
|
Session::on_initialize(System::block_number());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::validators().len(), 1);
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_score_should_be_accurate_on_large_stakes() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
bond_validator(2, u64::max_value());
|
|
bond_validator(4, u64::max_value());
|
|
bond_validator(6, u64::max_value()-1);
|
|
bond_validator(8, u64::max_value()-2);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Session::validators(), vec![4, 2]);
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_should_not_overflow_validators() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
|
|
bond_validator(2, u64::max_value());
|
|
bond_validator(4, u64::max_value());
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(6, u64::max_value()/2, vec![3, 5]);
|
|
bond_nominator(8, u64::max_value()/2, vec![3, 5]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![4, 2]);
|
|
|
|
// This test will fail this. Will saturate.
|
|
// check_exposure_all();
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(3).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(5).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_should_not_overflow_nominators() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
|
|
bond_validator(2, u64::max_value()/2);
|
|
bond_validator(4, u64::max_value()/2);
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(6, u64::max_value(), vec![3, 5]);
|
|
bond_nominator(8, u64::max_value(), vec![3, 5]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![4, 2]);
|
|
|
|
// Saturate.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(3).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(5).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_should_not_overflow_ultimate() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
bond_validator(2, u64::max_value());
|
|
bond_validator(4, u64::max_value());
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(6, u64::max_value(), vec![3, 5]);
|
|
bond_nominator(8, u64::max_value(), vec![3, 5]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![4, 2]);
|
|
|
|
// Saturate.
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(3).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
assert_eq!(Staking::stakers(5).total, u64::max_value());
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_large_scale_test() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(20)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(30));
|
|
let prefix = 200;
|
|
|
|
bond_validator(prefix + 2, 1);
|
|
bond_validator(prefix + 4, 100);
|
|
bond_validator(prefix + 6, 1000000);
|
|
bond_validator(prefix + 8, 100000000001000);
|
|
bond_validator(prefix + 10, 100000000002000);
|
|
bond_validator(prefix + 12, 100000000003000);
|
|
bond_validator(prefix + 14, 400000000000000);
|
|
bond_validator(prefix + 16, 400000000001000);
|
|
bond_validator(prefix + 18, 18000000000000000);
|
|
bond_validator(prefix + 20, 20000000000000000);
|
|
bond_validator(prefix + 22, 500000000000100000);
|
|
bond_validator(prefix + 24, 500000000000200000);
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(50, 990000000000000000, vec![
|
|
prefix + 3,
|
|
prefix + 5,
|
|
prefix + 7,
|
|
prefix + 9,
|
|
prefix + 11,
|
|
prefix + 13,
|
|
prefix + 15,
|
|
prefix + 17,
|
|
prefix + 19,
|
|
prefix + 21,
|
|
prefix + 23,
|
|
prefix + 25]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// For manual inspection
|
|
println!("Validators are {:?}", Session::validators());
|
|
println!("Validators are {:#?}",
|
|
Session::validators()
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.map(|v| (v.clone(), Staking::stakers(v+1)))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<(u64, Exposure<u64, u64>)>>()
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Each exposure => total == own + sum(others)
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
|
|
// aside from some error, stake must be divided correctly
|
|
let individual_expo_sum: u128 = Session::validators()
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.map(|v| Staking::stakers(v+1))
|
|
.fold(0u128, |s, v| if v.others.len() > 0 { s + v.others[0].value as u128 } else { s });
|
|
assert!(
|
|
990000000000000000 - individual_expo_sum < 100,
|
|
format!(
|
|
"Nominator stake = {} / SUM(individual expo) = {} / diff = {}",
|
|
990000000000000000u64,
|
|
individual_expo_sum,
|
|
990000000000000000 - individual_expo_sum
|
|
)
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn phragmen_large_scale_test_2() {
|
|
with_externalities(&mut ExtBuilder::default()
|
|
.nominate(false)
|
|
.minimum_validator_count(1)
|
|
.validator_count(2)
|
|
.build(),
|
|
|| {
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10));
|
|
let _ = Staking::chill(Origin::signed(20));
|
|
let nom_budget: u64 = 1_000_000_000_000_000_000;
|
|
let c_budget: u64 = 4_000_000;
|
|
|
|
bond_validator(2, c_budget as u64);
|
|
bond_validator(4, c_budget as u64);
|
|
|
|
bond_nominator(50, nom_budget, vec![3, 5]);
|
|
|
|
start_era(1);
|
|
|
|
// Each exposure => total == own + sum(others)
|
|
check_exposure_all();
|
|
|
|
assert_total_expo(3, nom_budget / 2 + c_budget);
|
|
assert_total_expo(5, nom_budget / 2 + c_budget);
|
|
})
|
|
}
|