This PR introduces the new crate `developer_hub` into the polkadot-sdk repo. The vision for the developer-hub crate is detailed in [this document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XLLkFNE8v8HLvZpI2rzsa8N2IN1FcKntc8q-Sc4xBAk/edit?usp=sharing). <img width="1128" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-02 at 10 45 48" src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/5588131/1e12b60f-fef5-42c4-8503-a3ba234077c3"> Other than adding the new crate, it also does the following: * Remove the `substrate` crate, as there is now a unique umbrella crate for multiple things in `developer_hub::polkadot_sdk`. * (backport candidate) A minor change to `frame-support` macros that allows `T::RuntimeOrigin` to also be acceptable as the origin type. * (backport candidate) A minor change to `frame-system` that allows us to deposit events at genesis because now the real genesis config is generated via wasm, and we can safely assume `cfg!(feature = "std")` means only testing. related to #62. * (backport candidate) Introduces a small `read_events_for_pallet` to `frame_system` for easier event reading in tests. * From https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/31, it takes action on improving the `pallet::call` docs. * From https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/31, it takes action on improving the `UncheckedExtrinsic` docs. ## Way Forward First, a version of this is deployed temporarily [here](https://blog.kianenigma.nl/polkadot-sdk/developer_hub/index.html). I will keep it up to date on a daily basis. ### This Pull Request I see two ways forward: 1. We acknowledge that everything in `developer-hub` is going to be WIP, and merge this asap. We should not yet use links to this crate anywhere. 2. We make this be the feature branch, make PRs against this, and either gradually backport it, or only merge to master once it is done. I am personally in favor of option 1. If we stick to option 2, we need a better way to deploy a staging version of this to gh-pages. ### Issue Tracking The main issues related to the future of `developer_hub` are: - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/31 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/4 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/26 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/32 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/36 ### After This Pull Request - [ ] create a redirect for https://paritytech.github.io/polkadot-sdk/master/substrate/ - [x] analytics - [ ] link checker - [ ] the matter of publishing, and how all of these relative links for when we do, that is still an open question. There is section on this in the landing page. - [ ] updated https://paritytech.github.io/ --------- Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com> Co-authored-by: Juan Girini <juangirini@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: bader y <ibnbassem@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <skunert49@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: James Wilson <james@jsdw.me> Co-authored-by: Michal Kucharczyk <1728078+michalkucharczyk@users.noreply.github.com>
Collective system: Members of a set of account IDs can make their collective feelings known through dispatched calls from one of two specialized origins.
The membership can be provided in one of two ways: either directly, using the Root-dispatchable
function set_members, or indirectly, through implementing the ChangeMembers.
The pallet assumes that the amount of members stays at or below MaxMembers for its weight
calculations, but enforces this neither in set_members nor in change_members_sorted.
A "prime" member may be set to help determine the default vote behavior based on chain
config. If PrimeDefaultVote is used, the prime vote acts as the default vote in case of any
abstentions after the voting period. If MoreThanMajorityThenPrimeDefaultVote is used, then
abstentations will first follow the majority of the collective voting, and then the prime
member.
Voting happens through motions comprising a proposal (i.e. a dispatchable) plus a
number of approvals required for it to pass and be called. Motions are open for members to
vote on for a minimum period given by MotionDuration. As soon as the required number of
approvals is given, the motion is closed and executed. If the number of approvals is not reached
during the voting period, then close may be called by any account in order to force the end
the motion explicitly. If a prime member is defined, then their vote is used instead of any
abstentions and the proposal is executed if there are enough approvals counting the new votes.
If there are not, or if no prime member is set, then the motion is dropped without being executed.
License: Apache-2.0