Two pieces of infrastructure existed only on servers, as single copies with no history and no review: /usr/local/bin/supabase-deploy-functions the gate both projects deploy through /opt/supabase-self-hosted/functions-registry.json who owns which function name The gate exists to stop silent drift between what a repo declares and what a server actually runs. Leaving it unversioned meant the mechanism was drifting the same way it was built to prevent — and losing that host would have lost it entirely, along with any record of why it works the way it does. Both are now in ops/ and synced to the host by CI on every deploy, installed before the functions they validate so a change to the gate ships together with them. Verified identical to the server copies by checksum before committing, so this captures the running state rather than replacing it. Branch protection gets the same treatment: apply-repo-settings.sh is idempotent and has a --check mode that reports drift without changing anything. It was applied by hand through the API today, so nothing here reflected it. Documented alongside: why the registry lives in this repo even though pwap-web depends on it (a pwap-web change needs a PR here — deliberate friction, since the registry is the record of who owns what and should not be edited on a server where nobody sees the change), and why listing each CI job individually in the protection rules is a weakness here that pwap-web avoids with an aggregate job.
ops
Infrastructure that runs on the Supabase host, kept here rather than only on the server.
supabase-deploy-functions + functions-registry.json
The ownership gate for the shared edge-function volume on vps3.
Two projects deploy into one volume: this repo and pwap-web. Before the gate
existed, pwap-web rsynced its whole tree in, so whoever deployed last silently
overwrote any function name they happened to share. On 2026-06-28 that replaced
this project's telegram-auth with pwap-web's login-widget handler, and sign-in
— plus every wallet screen behind it — returned 401 for a month. Nothing failed
loudly, because the name still resolved; it just resolved to the wrong project's
code.
The gate is the only supported way to write into that volume. It refuses any directory the calling project does not own, and refuses names absent from the registry entirely, so a new collision cannot be introduced by accident.
supabase-deploy-functions --project <name> --src <dir> [--restart] [--dry-run]
- Validates every incoming directory before writing anything — a refused deploy leaves the volume untouched rather than half-updated
- Writes atomically per function, so a reader never sees a partial function
- Serialises with
flock: two projects deploy here and both restart the same runtime. Without it, one deploy can recreate the container while another is mid-restart, which is what turned a successful deploy into a failed job on 2026-07-30 - Retries the restart, and if it still fails, checks whether the runtime is actually up before reporting failure — a racing restart should not be reported as a broken deploy
- Logs every decision to
/var/log/supabase-function-deploys.log
rsync --delete and wholesale copying into that volume are not acceptable.
The registry
functions-registry.json records which project owns which function name. A new
function must be added here before it can be deployed — that is the point:
the gate refuses unknown names so a collision is caught at deploy time rather
than discovered a month later.
Current ownership: 21 names to this project, 12 to pwap-web, 2 to the platform
(hello, main).
_cloud_hosted lists functions that live on the cloud Supabase project
(vbhftvdayqfmcgmzdxfv), not on vps3: telegram-bot and ask. Both Telegram
bots reach the cloud project by webhook, and news.pex.mom's assistant calls ask
there. Stale copies of both sit in the vps3 volume from before that split and
serve no traffic — deploying them here updates a dead copy while the live one
keeps running whatever was last pushed by hand.
pwap-web depends on this file too. It is versioned here because this project owns the larger share and the gate was built for its incident, but a pwap-web change that adds a function needs a PR here first. That is deliberate friction: the registry is the record of who owns what, and it should not be edited on the server where nobody can see the change.
Deployment
.github/workflows/deploy.yml copies both to the host on every deploy, so the
server copy is replaced from version control rather than edited in place. Before
this, the script existed only at /usr/local/bin/supabase-deploy-functions — one
copy, no history, no review, and gone with the server. The mechanism built to
stop silent drift was itself drifting.
apply-repo-settings.sh
This repo's branch protection, as code. See the header in that file; run
--check to report drift without changing anything.
Note: every CI job is listed individually because this repo has no aggregate gate
job, so a renamed job silently drops a requirement. An aggregate job (as pwap-web
has with CI Gate ✅) would be sturdier.