pezkuwichain/kurdistan_blockchain-akademy
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/pezkuwichain/kurdistan_blockchain-akademy.git synced 2026-06-13 11:41:07 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Removes misleading task for a procedural derive macro (#17)

Browse Source 
* removes question about implementing a procedural `#[derive(CountOf)]` macro

* adds concluding line back in
This commit is contained in:
peetzweg/
2023-10-17 19:18:01 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent 20151dff7c
commit c5e230f8ab
1 changed files with 0 additions and 13 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
src/i_extension_traits.rs
-13
View File
@@ -59,19 +59,6 @@ impl OutcomeCount for Vec<Outcome> {
// Now we can call these functions directly on `Vec<Outcome>`.
// But all of that is a lot of boilerplate. Wouldn't it be nice to have a `derive` macro that
// exactly does this, on any enum?
//
// In that case, for any `enum Foo { X, Y, .. }`, `#[derive(CountOf)]` would generate a trait
// `CountOfFoo`, with functions named `fn x_count`, `fn y_count` etc. Finally, it would implement
// `CountOfFoo` for `Vec<Foo>`.
//
// And heck, you could then easily implement it for other collections of `Foo`, such as
// `HashMap<_, Foo>` etc.
// This problem does NOT require you to implement such a macro. Perhaps you will encounter that
// macro problem somewhere in the future.
/// This function is not graded. It is just for collecting feedback.
/// On a scale from 0 - 255, with zero being extremely easy and 255 being extremely hard,
/// how hard did you find this section of the exam.