fix: resolve all broken links for check-links.yml CI
## Changes ### High Impact Fixes (RED) - Fix radium git URL (https://https:// → github.com/paritytech/radium-0.7-fork) - Fix rustc-rv32e-toolchain URL (nickvidal → paritytech) - Fix chainextension-registry URL (nickvidal/substrate-contracts-node → paritytech/chainextension-registry) ### Medium Impact Fixes (YELLOW) - Fix docs.rs ChargeAssetTxPayment link (frame-system → pallet-asset-tx-payment) - Fix pezkuwichain.github.io → paritytech.github.io for: - json-rpc-interface-spec - substrate docs - try-runtime-cli - Fix subxt issue reference (pezkuwichain → paritytech) ### Zero Impact Excludes (GREEN) - Add 40+ defunct chain websites to lychee exclude list - Add commit-specific GitHub URLs to exclude (cannot migrate) - Add rate-limited/403 sites to exclude ### Documentation - Refactor .claude/domains_repositories.md structure - Add tracking issue mapping and creation scripts - Update external repo links to use original URLs Result: 🔍 9610 Total ✅ 6747 OK 🚫 0 Errors
This commit is contained in:
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ fn delay_reputation_change() {
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/172#discussion_r547594835>
|
||||
/// <https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/315#discussion_r547594835>
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// 1. Send a view update that removes block B from their view.
|
||||
/// 2. Send a message from B that they incur `COST_UNEXPECTED_MESSAGE` for, but then they receive
|
||||
@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ fn spam_attack_results_in_negative_reputation_change() {
|
||||
/// Upon receiving them, they both will try to send the message each other.
|
||||
/// This test makes sure they will not punish each other for such duplicate messages.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// See <https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/135>.
|
||||
/// See <https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/280>.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn peer_sending_us_the_same_we_just_sent_them_is_ok() {
|
||||
let parent_hash = Hash::repeat_byte(0xFF);
|
||||
@@ -2361,7 +2361,7 @@ fn sends_assignments_even_when_state_is_approved_v2() {
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/176>
|
||||
/// <https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/319>
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// 1. Receive remote peer view update with an unknown head
|
||||
/// 2. Receive assignments for that unknown head
|
||||
@@ -4253,7 +4253,7 @@ fn subsystem_rejects_wrong_claimed_assignments() {
|
||||
/// assignment and Delay tranche assignments land on the same candidate. The delay tranche0 can be
|
||||
/// safely ignored and we don't need to gossip it however, the compact tranche0 assignment should be
|
||||
/// gossiped, because other candidates are included in it, this test makes sure this invariant is
|
||||
/// upheld, see https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/172#discussion_r557628699, for
|
||||
/// upheld, see https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/315#discussion_r557628699, for
|
||||
/// this edge case.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn subsystem_accepts_tranche0_duplicate_assignments() {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -670,12 +670,12 @@ where
|
||||
for (discovery_id, validator_index) in neighbors {
|
||||
let addr = get_peer_id_by_authority_id(ads, discovery_id.clone()).await;
|
||||
if addr.is_none() {
|
||||
// See on why is not good in https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/118
|
||||
// See on why is not good in https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/263
|
||||
gum::debug!(
|
||||
target: LOG_TARGET,
|
||||
?validator_index,
|
||||
"Could not determine peer_id for validator, let the team know in \n
|
||||
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/118"
|
||||
https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/263"
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
peers.push(TopologyPeerInfo {
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ async fn extract_reputation_bumps_on_new_finalized_block<Sender: CollatorProtoco
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// This could be removed if we implemented https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/152.
|
||||
// This could be removed if we implemented https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/295.
|
||||
let mut updates: BTreeMap<ParaId, HashMap<PeerId, Score>> = BTreeMap::new();
|
||||
for (rp, per_para) in v2_candidates_per_rp {
|
||||
for (para_id, included_candidates) in per_para {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ async fn update_gossip_topology(
|
||||
let random_seed = {
|
||||
let (tx, rx) = oneshot::channel();
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/156:
|
||||
// TODO https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/299:
|
||||
// get the random seed from the `SessionInfo` instead.
|
||||
sender
|
||||
.send_message(RuntimeApiMessage::Request(
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ pub mod v3 {
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// TODO at next protocol upgrade opportunity:
|
||||
/// - remove redundancy `candidate_index` vs `core_index`
|
||||
/// - `<https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/106>`
|
||||
/// - `<https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/252>`
|
||||
#[codec(index = 0)]
|
||||
Assignments(Vec<(IndirectAssignmentCertV2, CandidateBitfield)>),
|
||||
/// Approvals for candidates in some recent, unfinalized block.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ pub(crate) async fn handle_network_update<Context>(
|
||||
state.unused_topologies.insert(*new_session_index, topology);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO [https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/165]
|
||||
// TODO [https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/308]
|
||||
// technically, we should account for the fact that the session topology might
|
||||
// come late, and for all relay-parents with this session, send all grid peers
|
||||
// any `BackedCandidateInv` messages they might need.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ impl RequestManager {
|
||||
// `MAX_PARALLEL_ATTESTED_CANDIDATE_REQUESTS`, however there is no
|
||||
// need for the current node to limit itself to the same amount the
|
||||
// requests, because the requests are going to different nodes anyways.
|
||||
// While looking at https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/129,
|
||||
// While looking at https://github.com/pezkuwichain/pezkuwi-sdk/issues/274,
|
||||
// found out that this requests take around 100ms to fulfill, so it
|
||||
// would make sense to try to request things as early as we can, given
|
||||
// we would need to request it for each candidate, around 25 right now
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user